Method of forming low temperature dispersions

Abstract

Dispersions with lowered freezing points are provided by dissolving a dispersing agent in water, adding urea, adding a particulate inorganic solid, and then adding alcohol as a freezing point depressant. Dispersions formed in this manner can contain 20 to 75% inorganic solids in suspension without flocculating in the presence of the alcohol. Alternatively, the dispersant can be dissolved in an aqueous urea solution and the fine, particulate inorganic solid can be dispersed in the solution after which the alcohol may be added. These compositions exhibit depressed freezing points and can still be transported as a liquid at lower temperatures.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Attapulgite dispersions in water at 25 to 30% clay solids predispersed with TSPP (approximately 2-3% tetrasodium pyrophosphate based on the clay weight) are available from commercial sources and can be made in situ by the user. Processing in either case consists of dissolving the TSPP dispersant in water, adding the clay while agitating and continuing agitation until the major portion of the clay is dispersed. The dispersion can be used as made or can be processed to remove undispersed impurities. Other chemical agents such as small amounts of NaOH can be included as functional additives in the dispersion. They are added either before or after the incorporation of the clay.

The dispersion of attapulgite clay at 25 to 30% solids in water using condensed phosphates as dispersing agents is an old and well-known practice and has been described many times in the literature. The technique has also been described as a step in many U.S. Patents where the inventive feature has been some further treatment of the dispersion. U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,050,863, 3,509,066 and the references cited therein describe some methods of further treatment as examples.

When colloidal grades of attapulgite are used as gelling agents to stabilize suspensions or to thicken an undesirably thin aqueous system, the user often has the option as to how he will incorporate the clay into his system. He may either add the dry clay during processing and disperse it by mechanical work input or he may add predispersed clay which has been subjected to prior processing as described above. In either case the clay must end up with an extended flocculated structure in the final product to give the desired thickening or suspension effects.

The advantages of using predispersed attapulgite are that (1) the clumps of needles present in the dry colloidal clay products can be dispersed in water using a condensed phosphate dispersant with much less work input than is necessary in mechanical dispersion and (2) the efficiency of the predispersed clay in its intended use is 2 to 3 times better than that achieved in strictly mechanical dispersion. The disadvantages of predispersed clay slurries are (1) the poor economics of shipping 75% water for long-distance trips and (2) the fact that the freezing point of the dispersion is approximately 32.degree. F. This second factor, the 32.degree. F. freezing point, prevents the shipment and outdoor storage of predispersed slurries in many parts of the U.S. during the winter. In many parts of the country this would prevent shipment in unheated tank cars and trucks from October of one year to April of the next year. This situation has been a retarding factor in the development and use of such a desirable product.

Materials normally used as antifreezes, such as methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol and eutectic salt solutions, cannot be used in the above-described predispersions because they cause the predispersion to flocculate and become excessively viscous so that it can no longer be stirred or pumped. Furthermore, after such a flocculation it no longer exhibits the above-mentioned ease of use and must be redispersed mechanically for utilization.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a technique to overcome this inherent incompatibility of the feasible anti-freeze compounds by having dissolved urea present in the particulate dispersion when the antifreeze compounds are added as a final addition.

Urea is essentially a nonionic compound and, because of its lack of ionoticity in solution, solutions of urea can be used as a dispersing media when using condensed phosphates as dispersants. The beneficial results are believed to be related to the interfacial characteristics of the urea-solution/particle surface interface which are altered by the adsorption from solution of molecular urea in such a manner that, although condensed phosphates are still capable of charging up and dispersing the solids, the antifreeze compounds (alcohols and glycols) are blocked from dehydrating the surface and causing flocculation. Since urea is a nitrogenous compound formed from carbon dioxide and ammonia, other compounds of similar chemistry are believed to provide similar beneficial results. However, urea will not prevent flocculation with eutectic salt solutions because the mechanism of flocculation of dispersed particles is different with ionic materials. When ionic materials cause flocculation the flocculation is caused by the collapse of the protective charged double layer and the adsorbed urea evidently does not prevent this phenomenon.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Urea concentrations in water for use within this invention are 3 to 30% by weight of the dispersion. Particulate materials of interest include clays such as sepiolite and attapulgite (palygorskite) at concentrations of 20 to 30% solids and kaolin, calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide at concentrations of up to 65 to 75% solids. Dispersants of utility are the condensed phosphate dispersants normally used with minerals such as TSPP (tetrasodium pyrophosphate), STP (sodium tripolyphosphate), Calgon, etc. at 0.2 to 4% by weight of the solid particles. Antifreezes useable with this invention are methyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, isopropanol and desirable mixtures thereof in amounts of 9 to 30% by weight of the dispersion. The primary intended fields of interest for the inventive dispersions with depressed freezing points include suspensions of: fertilizer, soil treating material, animal feed, paint pigments and powdered coal.

Freezing point depressions in water as listed in the Encyclopedia of Chem. Tech., Kirk-Othmer, Ed. 2, Vol. 2, p. 547, for the antifreeze compounds used within this invention are:

______________________________________ Freezing Points (% by vol.) Density 20% in water 30% in water______________________________________Methanol 0.80 +9.degree. F. -4.degree. F.Ethanol 0.80 +18.degree. F. +5.degree. F.Ethylene 1.13 +17.degree. F. +6.degree. F. Glycol______________________________________

The addition of urea to water depresses the freezing points further than listed above and also modifies the freezing characteristics of the resulting solution.

To demonstrate some of the possibilities of this invention, the examples listed on Table 1 were made using a Sterling multi-mixer. The dispersants in each of the examples were dissolved in water prior to the addition of the urea and then the urea was dissolved before the dispersion was made by adding the solid particles. The antifreeze component, methanol, was added as the last ingredient in all the examples listed. p The particulate material used in the examples is Min-U-Gel 200, a colloidal attapulgite product of the Floridin Co., Pittsburgh, Pa.

To determine the feasibility of using ethanol as a freezing point depressant in accordance with this invention, the processing previously described was repeated using ethanol in place of methanol. The formulations and results shown in Table II for each of the examples listed show that ethanol can be used as an effective freezing point depressant in the urea-STP suspensions whereas methanol was effective for both urea-TSPP and urea-STP suspensions.

TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________ Ingredient Methanol FormulationsWeight % Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5 Example 6 Example Example__________________________________________________________________________ 8Water 61.72 43.20 49.38 55.55 49.34 57.00 49.38 61.72TSPP 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 -- -- --STP -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.77 0.77Urea -- 18.52 12.34 6.17 12.33 18.00 12.34 --Min-U-Gel 200 25.72 25.72 25.72 25.72 25.70 25.00 25.72 25.72Methanol 11.79 11.79 11.79 11.79 11.79 -- 11.79 11.79 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00Comments Very thick Thin Thin-med. Med. *5 Drops Couldn't Thin V. thick Thickness 50% Caustic get all (0.07%) of the 100.00 clay inComponents In Solution% Urea 0 24.92 16.62 8.31 16.60 24 16.62 0% Methanol 15.88 15.88 15.88 15.88 15.86 0 15.88 15.88Brookfield Visc., cpsInitial 10 RPM -- 1000 3600 6000 5200 -- 1500 -- 20 RPM -- 850 1950 3200 2750 -- 850 -- 50 RPM -- 520 1000 1420 1400 -- 420 -- 100 RPM -- 300 560 820 740 -- 270 --1 Week 10 RPM 2500 1500 4600 7700 7000 -- 1100 -- 20 RPM 1500 1100 2600 4000 3800 -- 1000 -- 50 RPM 700 720 1080 1700 1600 -- 600 -- 100 RPM 490 530 630 960 930 -- 410 --2 Weeks 10 RPM 2050 1700 4850 8000 7500 -- 600 -- 20 RPM 1350 1375 2525 Discarded -- 850 -- 50 RPM 700 840 1120 too thick -- 700 -- 100 RPM 385 555 580 -- 470 --Low Temp.Characteristics Slush at V. thin -- -- -- -- V. thin -15.degree. C. at -12.degree. C. at -12.degree. C.__________________________________________________________________________ Table II__________________________________________________________________________ Ingredient Ethanol FormulationsWeight % Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4__________________________________________________________________________Water 61.72 43.20 43.20 49.38TSPP 0.77 0.77 -- --STP -- -- 0.77 0.77Urea -- 18.52 18.52 12.34Min-U-Gel 200 25.72 25.72 25.72 25.72Ethanol 11.79 11.79 11.79 11.79 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00Comments Too thick V. thick Med. Med. to thin for Et OH Couldn't formulateComponents in Solution% Urea 0 24.9 24.9 16.6% Ethanol 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9Brookfield Visc. (cps)Initial 10 RPM -- >10,000 4600 4000 20 RPM -- -- 2550 2100 50 RPM -- -- 1320 1040 100 RPM -- -- 610 5503 days 10 RPM -- .about.10,000 1800 1000 20 RPM -- -- 1400 1000 50 RPM -- -- 800 700 100 RPM -- -- 470 4651 Week 10 RPM -- 10,600 2700 2100 20 RPM -- 5800 1750 1500 50 RPM -- 2800 960 900 100 RPM -- 1800 590 5602 Weeks 10 RPM -- 10,000 4400 2000 20 RPM -- Discarded 2650 1475 50 RPM -- 1260 840 100 RPM -- 680 510Low Temp.Characteristics Slush at -15.degree. C. -- Pourable at Pourable -12.degree. C. at -12.degree. C.__________________________________________________________________________

The control formulations made up with water and either dispersant including urea and M-G 200 (attapulgite clay) were low in viscosity and froze at slightly less than 0.degree. C. and at temperatures lower than -3.degree. C. there were many crystals formed. To determine formulations for ethylene glycol, the previous processing was followed and the examples listed in Table III were prepared. The results show good handling properties with both the urea-TSPP, and urea-STP clay suspensions with ethylene glycol at temperatures as low as -9.degree. C.

To determine the results achievable with a low-shear mixer, the formulations shown in Table IV were made up with a Lightnin' mixer. The results indicate that both the ethanol-urea and methanol-urea compositions were pumpable as low as -12.degree. C. (Examples 3, 4 and 5).

To determine the gelling efficiency of various pre-dispersions, the predispersions, were evaluated as gellants for a diammonium phosphate solution (DAP) and a urea/ammonium nitrate solution (UAN). The DAP test consisted of 36 g of dispersed clay (25% dispersion) to 264 g of DAP solution (30% DAP; 70% water). The UAN test consisted of 264 g of UAN solution (35.4% urea, 44.3% ammonium nitrate, 20.3% water) to 36 g of predipersion. Mixing for each dispersion was provided by submitting each dispersion to 15 minutes in a Lightnin' mixer.

These results shown in Table V indicate that the urea-antifreeze slurries (Examples 3, 4 and 5) are generally equivalent to or better than the controls (Examples 1 and 2) in the UAN and DAP tests at 10 RPM (viscosity reading) without building up excessive readings at 100 RPM.

Table III__________________________________________________________________________Ingredient Ethylene Glycol FormulasWeight % Example 1 Example 2* Example 3 Example 4 Example__________________________________________________________________________ 5Water 58.87 58.87 (1) 43.63 48.72 48.72TSPP 0.74 0.74 (2) 0.74 0.74 --STP -- -- -- -- 0.74Urea -- -- 18.73 12.18 12.18Min-U-Gel 200 24.52 24.52 (4) 24.65 24.60 24.60Ethylene Glycol 15.87 15.87 (3) 12.25 13.76 13.76 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00Initial Comments Med. to thick Med. Med. Med. V. thinComponents in Solution% Urea 0 0 24.86 16.2 16.2% Et. Glycol 21.0 21.0 16.26 18.3 18.3Brookfield Visc. (cps)Initial 10 RPM 6500 4700 2550 4000 100 20 RPM 3300 2500 1400 2000 80 50 RPM 1460 1100 820 900 72 100 RPM 860 640 520 540 841 Week 10 RPM >10,000 >10,000 20 RPM Discard 50 RPM Thickening due to intercollation 100 RPM of the montmorilloniteBrookfield Visc. (cps) Gelled at -5.degree. C., Pourable Thin at -5.degree. C.1 Week at 10 RPM 4600 -- 400-5.degree. C. 20 RPM 2600 -- 400 50 RPM 1320 -- 350 100 RPM 940 -- 330at -9.degree. C. 10 RPM 5000 -- 300 20 RPM 3700 -- 250 50 RPM 2440 -- 240 100 RPM 1600 -- 200__________________________________________________________________________ *numbers in () indicate order of addition Table IV__________________________________________________________________________Ingredient Example 1 Example 2Weight % (Control) (Control) Example 3 Example 4 Example 5__________________________________________________________________________Water 74.44 74.44 45.23 49.5 49.5TSPP 0.74 -- 0.77 -- --STP -- 0.74 -- 0.75 0.75Urea -- -- 19.39 12.38 12.38Min-U-Gel 200 24.82 24.82 25.57 25. 25.Methanol -- -- 9.05 12.37 --Ethanol -- -- -- -- 12.37 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.0Comments Thin Thin Hard to get all clay inComponents in Solution% Urea 0 0 26.0 16.5 16.5% Alcohol 0 0 12.2 16.5 16.5Brookfield Visc. (cps) at 70.degree. F.:Initial 10 RPM 200 900 2000 500 2000 20 RPM 175 800 1250 400 1250 50 RPM 144 490 700 240 800 100 RPM 130 375 400 175 5453 Days 10 RPM 500 900 2500 450 1000 20 RPM 475 850 1750 400 825 50 RPM 410 640 940 340 580 100 RPM 440 535 610 305 460Low temp.Characteristics Freezes Freezes At -12.degree. C. At -12.degree. C. At-12.degree. C. .about.0.degree. C. .about.0.degree. C. slushy gel thin, slushy at -10 .degree. C. pumpable at -5.degree. C. thin & thin pumpableBrookfield Visc. (cps) at -5.degree. C.:(23.degree. F.) 10 RPM -- -- 2000 550 3500 20 RPM -- -- 1720 550 3500 50 RPM -- -- 1320 510 >2000 100 RPM -- -- 990 570 >1000__________________________________________________________________________ Table V__________________________________________________________________________Brookfield Viscosities (cps) at RPM Shown Test Group UAN Test DAP TestExample Formula Table 10 RPM 100 RPM 10 RPM 100 RPM__________________________________________________________________________1 TSPP (Control) IV 2500 400 1730 2602 STP (Control) IV 2300 350 1850 2953 TSPP, 26 U/12 M IV 3000 455 1800 2804 STP, 16.5 U/16.5 M IV 2500 365 1900 3005 STP, 16.5 U/16.5 E IV 2550 375 1800 2801 TSPP, O U/16 E (Control) II 3450 465 2300 3402 TSPP, 25 U/16 E (Control) II 3500 510 2150 3153 TSPP, 25 U/16 EG III 3000 445 1950 3005 STP, 16 U/18 EG III 3100 435 1900 3201 TSPP, O U/16 M I 2700 435 2000 3052 TSPP, 25 U/16 M I 3300 500 2000 3107 STP, 17 U/16 M I 2600 435 2550 3903 STP, 25 U/16 E II 2600 385 2000 3054 STP, 17 U/16 E II 2300 340 2000 209__________________________________________________________________________

To determine the low temperature effects on the viscosity of some of the examples containing urea, Examples 3, 4 and 5 (from Table 5), were held at 20.degree. F. (-6.7.degree. C.) for two weeks in a freezer. At the end of this period Examples 3 and 4 were flowable and Example 5 was very thick. Example 3 and Example 4 were pumpable and Example 5 was questionable.

The preferred embodiments previously described are presented as examples only and it is to be understood that variations in concentrations may be made by those skilled in the art. While the examples are directed to attapulgite clay dispersions, dispersions of other minerals and particulate inorganic solids such as sepiolite, kaolin, calcium carbonate, coal dust and titanium dioxide show the same properties of freezing point depression when dispersed in urea solutions. Dispersants such as TSPP, STP, other condensed-phosphate sodium salts, sodium polyacrylates, sodium polymethacrylates, functional blends of the above dispersants, and TSPP/sodium naphthylene-formaldehyde sulfonate blends do not cause the aforementioned materials to drop out of suspension when anti-freeze additives such as methanol, ethanol and ethylene glycol are added to the urea solution.

Examples of other clay dispersions include sepiolite, attapulgite, or palygorskite particles at concentrations of 20 to 30% by weight of dispersion, 1 to 4% dispersant by weight of the solid particles, urea in an amount equal to 3 to 30% by weight of the dispersion, antifreeze in an amount equal to 9 to 30% by weight of the dispersion and water. The preferred concentrations include 2 to 3% dispersant by weight of solid particles and 15 to 30% urea by weight of the dispersion.

When using kaolin, titanium dioxide or calcium carbonate, the particle concentration may be increase up to 65 to 75% by weight of the dispersion while using only 0.2 to 1% dispersant by weight of the solid particles. The preferred dispersant concentration is in the range of 0.2 to 0.3% by weight of the solids and the preferred urea concentration is again 15 to 30% by weight of the dispersion.

The concentration of antifreeze can generally be varied between 9 to 30% by weight of the dispersion with higher concentrations being uneconomical and lower concentrations not being very meaningful.

In addition to the above described method of preparing the dispersion, the urea may first be mixed into the water, followed by the dissolving of the dispersant after which the solids may be mixed into the dispersion with the final step being the addition of the antifreeze.

Although the invention is directed to water suspensions of materials, it is to be understood that other liquid suspending means and other particulate materials readily fall within the scope of the invention.

Claims

1. A method of forming an aqueous dispersior of solid particles having a depressed freezing point, comprising the steps of:

dissolving a condensed phosphate dispersant in water in an amount equal to 0.2 to 4.0% by weight of solid particles to be added;

mixing urea into the water containing the dispersant in an amount equal to 3 to 30% by weight of the dispersion;

adding solid particles to the mixture in an amount equal to 20 to 75% by weight of the dispersion; and

adding an antifreeze solution selected from the group consisting of methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, ethylene glycol and propylene glycol to the dispersion in an amount equal to 9 to 30% by weight of the dispersion to depress the freezing point of the dispersion without flocculating the solid particles.

2. A method as described in claim 1, wherein the solid particles comprise a clay selected from the group consisting of sepiolite, attapulgite, palygorskite and kaolin.

3. A method as described in claim 1, wherein the solid particles are selected from the group consisting of calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide.

4. A method of forming an aqueous dispersion of solid particles having a depressed freezing point, comprising the steps of:

mixing urea into water in an amount equal to 3 to 30% by weight of the dispersion;

dissolving a condensed phosphate dispersant in the urea water mixture in an amount equal to 0.1 to 4.0 by weight of the solid particles to be added;

adding solid particles to the mixture in an amount equal to 20 to 75% by weight of the dispersion; and

adding an antifreeze solution selected from the group consisting of methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, ethylene glycol and propylene glycol to the dispersion in an amount equal to 9 to 30% by weight of the dispersion to depress the freezing point of the dispersion without flocculating the solid particles.

5. A method as described in claim 4, wherein the solid particles comprise a clay selected from the group consisting of sepiolite, attapulgite, palygorskite and kaolin.

6. A method as described in claim 4, wherein the solid particles are selected from the group consisting of calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide.