1. Field of the Invention
Embodiments of the present invention relate to seeding and/or making of dry hydrates and avoiding wax deposition without the aid of chemicals and with minimum use of rotating or other energized equipment. Other embodiments relate to the prevention of hydrate agglomeration and the prevention of wax deposition in a pipeline. The invention also relates to elimination of the use of energized equipment for melting, grinding or scraping hydrate solids and deposited waxes from inside of pipelines or flowlines. Also eliminated is the need for any recycle loops. In yet another embodiment there is no need for splitting the wellstream into two streams. In another aspect, the invention also avoids the use of rotating or other mechanized equipment that require remote vehicle intervention for maintenance and repair in subsea operations. In addition, embodiments of the invention eliminate the need for dual flowlines. Still other embodiments relate to the elimination of the need for heating or insulating flowlines for hydrate prevention and wax deposition prevention, thus reducing the cost of flowlines.
2. Discussion of Background Information
Among the most challenging problems in oil and gas production is the presence of natural gas hydrates in transport pipelines and equipment. Also very problematic is wax deposition in flow lines. Natural gas hydrate is an ice-like compound consisting of light hydrocarbon molecules encapsulated in an otherwise unstable water crystal structure. These hydrates form at high pressures and low temperatures wherever a suitable gas and water are present. Such conditions are prevalent in “cold-flow” pipelines, where the pipeline and wellstream fluids are unheated, and the wellstream fluids are allowed to flow through the pipeline at the low ambient temperatures often found in subsea environments. Cold-flow delivery of wellstream fluids is highly desirable, however, since it avoids the cost of insulating the pipeline and heating the pipeline and the contained fluids, but gas hydrate crystals can deposit on cold-flow pipeline walls and in associated equipment, and in the worst case lead to complete plugging of the system. Costly and time-consuming procedures may be needed to restore flow again in a pipeline plugged with hydrates and/or wax. In addition to the mere economic consequences, there are also numerous hazards connected to hydrate formation and removal, and there are known instances of pipeline ruptures and loss of human lives due to gas hydrates in pipelines. Although hydrate is generally thought of as a problem mostly for gas production, there is now ample evidence that it is also a significant problem for condensate and oil production systems. Wax deposition is also a costly problem when produced fluids naturally contain wax compounds, usually paraffin, that coat flow lines during liquid hydrocarbon production.
Several methods are known to prevent or eliminate hydrate formation and wax deposition, and subsequent problems in pipelines, valves and other production equipment, such as, for example, the processes disclosed in U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 20040176650 and 20040129609, U.S. Pat. No. 6,656,366. The article entitled “Continuous Gas Hydrate Formation Process by Static Mixing of Fluids,” Paper #1010 in 5th International Conference on Gas Hydrates, Trondheim, Norway, Jun. 13-16, 2005, by Tajima et al. contains additional background information.
Current methods of preventing or eliminating hydrate plug formation using dry hydrates may involve, at a minimum, a recycle loop of dry hydrates comprising a pump and/or grinder. In such methods, the continuous recycling of even dry hydrates in a recycle loop leads to the continued growth of the hydrates and the formation of larger and larger hydrates that, if not continuously ground into smaller hydrates using a grinder or similar equipment, would ultimately grow large enough to cause plugging. Unfortunately, the pump or grinder is an energized piece of rotating equipment that can pose problems in subsea applications. There are two problems with such subsea electrical rotating equipment. First, the reliability of rotating equipment is not yet sufficient to plan for long-term operation without multiple equipment replacements during the typical lifetime of a subsea pipeline. Second, electrical power transmission is limited in distance, thus limiting the distance over which some cold flow processes are useful.
Besides the problems of energized, rotating equipment in subsea applications, other problems occur with current cold flow methods, such as fluids forming “sticky hydrates”. If an unplanned shut-in occurs during the process, the reactor and possibly the main pipeline could experience a complete hydrate plug.
Some proposed solutions for generating dry hydrates for cold flow include rotating equipment, such as a pump or grinder. For example, the following have been proposed: the use of a modified pig with special pressure cleaning devices; subsea pig replacement devices operated by remote operated vehicles; high velocity, high-shear devices; mechanical scraping devices, including a rotating internal vane; near sonic pressure waves; and water hammer.
Many of the prior art methods use equipment that is not commercially proven and some of them require electricity. In addition, many require maintenance that is particularly costly in subsea applications.
Thus, there is a need for improved methods of seeding and/or making dry hydrates without the aid of continuous injection of chemicals and with minimum use of rotating or other energized equipment.
Wax deposition depends on the content of the produced or transferred fluid but usually occurs after production when the right temperature and pressure conditions are reached.
According to one aspect of the invention, a method for transporting a flow of wellstream hydrocarbons containing water through a main pipeline comprises seeding a cold-flow reactor before startup operation with dry hydrate particles, creating a dry hydrate sidestream by diverting a portion of wellstream of hydrocarbons into the reactor, wherein the wellstream hydrocarbons contains water, and feeding the dry hydrate sidestream into the main pipeline to be transported to a destination with the full wellstream. It can be readily appreciated that splitting a wellstream into two streams will be useful for retrofitting the invention to existing pipelines. In one aspect of the invention, dual flow lines will be useful for extending the cold flow process to high water cut conditions late in the field life. One flow line can be used to flow dead oil back to the well in order to reduce the water cut below 50%. Also, with respect to dry hydrates, heating may be useful on occasion on some equipment between the wellhead and the cold-flow reactor; heating is often useful with respect to timing the prevention of wax deposition. Where heating is used, insulation may be useful in some instances on some equipment between the wellhead and the cold-flow reactor.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for transporting a flow of wellstream hydrocarbons containing water through a main pipeline, the method comprising: creating a dry hydrate slurry in a separate reactor; delivering the slurry subsea via an injection umbilical; and feeding the dry hydrate wellstream slurry to the main pipeline.
According to further aspects of the invention, the separate reactor may be located on a platform. Alternatively, the separate reactor may be located on shore. Further yet, the separate reactor may be located on a vessel. The slurry may comprise dry hydrates and a liquid of hydrocarbon. The liquid may be a portion of the wellstream to be transported. At least one static mixer may be installed in the section of the main pipeline after a point where the dry hydrate sidestream is fed into the main pipeline.
According to further aspects of the invention, the wax has an appearance temperature or deposition temperature below which it solidifies in a flowing hydrocarbon stream. The solidification is often a deposition on the inside walls of the pipe where the ambient temperature outside the pipe is below that of the hydrocarbon stream (and below deposition/appearance/solidification temperature). Thus a temperature gradient is established from the center of the pipe to the inside wall and remains for wax deposition or coating unless the normal flow, usually laminar in nature, is disturbed or changed to a turbulent flow.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a method for transporting a flow of wellstream hydrocarbons containing water through a main pipeline comprises generating a dry hydrate sidestream slurry by diverting a portion of wellstream of hydrocarbons into a cold-flow reactor, wherein the wellstream of hydrocarbons contains water and the cold-flow reactor contains at least one static mixer, and feeding the slurry into the main pipeline to be transported to a destination with the full wellstream.
According to further aspects of the invention, the cold-flow reactor may be subsea. The method contemplates having no more than 5% of the full wellstream introduced to the cold-flow reactor to generate a dry hydrate sidestream. Alternatively, no more than 1% of the full wellstream is introduced to the cold-flow reactor to generate a dry hydrate sidestream. A particle size of the dry hydrate may be between about 1 to about 30 microns in diameter. The cold-flow reactor may be in the shape of a small diameter pipe. The cold-flow reactor may comprise alternating upward and downward flowing pipes. The alternating flowing pipes form an additional cold-flow reactor and the two cold reactors may be connected to each other. The method contemplates having about 10% of the full wellstream introduced to the additional cold-flow reactor and all diverted wellstream may be fed into the wellstream flow. Static mixers may be installed in the upward flowing pipes. At least one static mixer may be installed in the section of the main pipeline after a point where the dry hydrate sidestream is fed into the main pipeline.
According to an aspect of the invention, a method for transporting a flow of wellstream hydrocarbons containing water through a main pipeline comprises generating a dry hydrate sidestream slurry by diverting a portion of wellstream of hydrocarbons into a cold-flow reactor, the wellstream hydrocarbons containing a gas phase and a liquid phase, filling the cold-flow reactor with wellstream, the reactor comprising a gas fluid connection to a gas tank to allow gas phase in the wellstream to be separated from the liquid phase of the wellstream, and feeding the slurry into the main pipeline to be transported to a destination with the full wellstream.
According to another aspect of the invention, a method for transporting a flow of wellstream hydrocarbons containing water through a main pipeline comprises generating a dry hydrate sidestream slurry by diverting a portion of wellstream of hydrocarbons into a cold-flow reactor, wherein the reactor is a falling film reactor, and feeding the slurry into the main pipeline to be transported to a destination with the full wellstream.
According to further aspects of the invention, the diverted portion of wellstream may be injected into the cold-flow reactor along the walls of the reactor. The method further contemplates injecting water and high pressure gas into the falling film reactor to form the dry hydrate along the walls of the reactor. The injected water and gas may be separated from the dry hydrate sidestream slurry before the slurry is fed into the main pipeline. At least one static mixer may be installed in the section of the main pipeline after a point where the dry hydrate sidestream is fed into the main pipeline.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a method for transporting a flow of wellstream hydrocarbons containing water through a main pipeline comprises generating a dry hydrate sidestream slurry by diverting a portion of wellstream of hydrocarbons into a cold-flow reactor, wherein the wellstream hydrocarbons contains water and the cold-flow reactor is a pipe with roughened walls, and feeding the slurry into the main pipeline to be transported to a destination with the full wellstream.
According to a further aspect of the invention, a system for transporting a flow of wellstream hydrocarbons containing water comprises a main pipeline, and a cold-flow reactor installed in a pipe or tube connected to the main pipeline. Either a portion or all of the wellstream is fed through the cold-flow reactor. The system is substantially free of energized equipment.
According to an aspect of the invention, a system for transporting a flow of wellstream hydrocarbons containing water comprises a main pipeline, and an injection umbilical connected to a facility above sea level. Alternatively, a cold-flow reactor is installed subsea and a pipe or tube is connected to the main pipeline, wherein a portion of the wellstream is fed through the cold-flow reactor. The system is substantially free of energized equipment.
According to another aspect of the invention, a system for transporting a flow of wellstream hydrocarbons containing water comprises a main pipeline and a pipe or tube connected to the main pipeline, wherein a portion of the wellstream is fed through the cold-flow reactor. The system is substantially free of energized equipment. The cold-flow reactor comprises at least one static mixer.
According to a further aspect of the invention, a system for transporting a flow of wellstream hydrocarbons containing water comprises a main pipeline and a cold-flow reactor installed in a pipe or tube connected to the main pipeline, wherein a portion of the wellstream is fed through the cold-flow reactor, wherein the system is substantially free of energized equipment and the cold-flow reactor comprises a gas fluid connection to a gas tank.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a system for transporting a flow of wellstream hydrocarbons containing water comprises a main pipeline and a cold-flow reactor installed in a pipe or tube connected to the main pipeline, wherein a portion of the wellstream is fed through the cold-flow reactor, wherein the system is substantially free of energized equipment, and the cold-flow reactor comprises a falling film reactor.
According to yet a further aspect of the invention, a system for transporting a flow of wellstream hydrocarbons containing water comprises a main pipeline and a pipe or tube connected to the main pipeline, wherein a portion of the wellstream is fed through the cold-flow reactor, wherein the system is substantially free of energized equipment, and the pipe or tube has roughened walls.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a method for producing hydrocarbons comprises any one or a number of the above methods and systems for transporting hydrocarbons once the hydrocarbons are produced from the wellhead. The hydrocarbons are preferably greater than 50% of the total liquid volume. Gas phase hydrocarbons are most preferably less than 50% of the total pipe volume.
In still further embodiments, there is provided a method of producing dry hydrates, comprising: passing a hydrocarbon stream comprising water and one or more hydrate-forming gases through a cold-flow reactor, said cold-flow reactor having one or more static mixers disposed therein; reducing the droplet size of said water in said hydrocarbon stream by passing said hydrocarbon stream through said one or more static mixers; and converting at least a portion of said water into dry hydrates. The cold-flow reactor can be positioned within or form part of a pipeline for transporting the hydrocarbons. Alternatively, the cold-flow reactor can be positioned external to the pipeline for transporting the hydrocarbons, in which case the cold-flow reactor receives a sidestream of the hydrocarbons.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of avoiding wax deposition and rendering a pumpable fluid of liquid hydrocarbon and wax components, comprising conveying said fluid through a pipe connected to a reactor comprising a static mixer and through said reactor before and while the fluid temperature drops below the wax appearance temperature. The fluids are mixed by their action in the area of the static mixer(s), resulting in fine wax solids that are conveyed with the fluid rather than coated/deposited on the pipe wall. The fluids are then conveyed to a processing facility without materially increasing the fluid viscosity.
The static mixers, when positioned appropriately, disturb the generally normal laminar type flow that would otherwise permit wax deposition on the pipe walls, and create turbulent flow that retains formed wax particles in the flowing fluid.
A heat exchanger may be used near a wellhead or other source of fluid so as to define the wax precipitation pressure/temperature regime near such wellhead or source. Thus, the static mixer(s) can be positioned in the region to force wax particle formation and avoid deposition on pipeline walls. Further the produced stream could be subjected to the static mixer(s) in the region within about a kilometer, or one-half kilometer, or one-third kilometer of the source, usually about five minutes or seven minutes, or ten minutes of flow time and distance. This can be used for production or distribution pipelines and has great applicability to both subsea and arctic environments.
Anti-agglomerates are useful for shut-in although chemicals are not generally used during steady flow through the invention.
Other exemplary embodiments and advantages of the present invention may be ascertained by reviewing the present disclosure and the accompanying drawings.
The present invention is further described in the detailed description which follows, in reference to the noted plurality of drawings by way of non-limiting examples of embodiments of the present invention, in which like reference numerals represent similar parts throughout the several views of the drawings, and wherein:
In the following detailed description, the specific embodiments of the present invention are described in connection with its preferred embodiments. However, to the extent that the following description is specific to a particular embodiment or a particular use of the present techniques, it is intended to be illustrative only and merely provides a concise description of the exemplary embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments described below, but rather; the invention includes all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents falling within the true scope of the appended claims.
The present invention provides the use of dry hydrates and solidifying wax in a way that does not present problems associated with prior art teachings. The present invention also provides methods of seeding and/or making of dry hydrates without the aid of chemicals and with minimum use of rotating or other energized equipment.
The present invention is further demonstrated with the following embodiments.
In one embodiment of the present invention, small diameter, dry hydrate particles are placed in a reactor pipe or tube adapted to be placed in fluid communication with a wellstream before startup. The dry hydrate particles are used to seed the full wellstream. A small fraction of the full wellstream is passed once through a cold-flow reactor. The dry hydrates could be loaded during or after construction of the pipeline, before operating the wet wellstream or before the wellstream starts producing water. Contrary to the common view of avoiding placing hydrates in a pipeline on purpose because of the general notion that hydrates in a shut-in pipeline might fuse into one large hydrate mass that would plug the pipeline, the present invention proves that the advantage of providing seed of dry hydrate is that the facility can be started using the same process that is designed for re-start after planned and unplanned shut-ins. The dry hydrates useful in this embodiment may be formed using any suitable method for forming dry hydrate particles. In one or more embodiments, the dry hydrates are formed using a small-diameter pipe and/or a static mixer as described herein. Unlike other methods for delivering dry hydrate particles to wellstreams, the dry hydrate particles in the instant embodiment are not recycled in a loop. As explained above, the continuous recycling of even dry hydrates in a loop containing liquid water leads to the continued growth of the hydrates and the formation of larger and larger hydrates that, if not continuously ground into smaller hydrates using a grinder or similar equipment, would ultimately grow large enough to cause plugging. Thus, in one or more embodiments, the present invention is any of the other embodiments described herein where the dry hydrates are formed without recycling hydrates in a recycle loop.
In one or more other embodiments of the present invention, equipment, such as manifolds, valves, vessels, pipelines, jumpers, etc., may be pre-filled with a dry hydrate slurry during subsea installation by providing for pressure and low temperature to be maintained in the equipment during installation. The dry hydrate slurry would be preserved by the low temperature and high pressure until the time to start up the production flowline. As dry hydrate slurries do not agglomerate under such conditions in the absence of a recycle loop, there is no difficulty maintaining fluid flow at startup. Therefore, the present invention could be employed with several different types of processes for hydrate management, including chemical injection, insulated pipe, cold flow processes of any kind, etc.
In another embodiment, dry hydrates are delivered to the cold-flow reactor subsea through a chemical injection umbilical. The dry hydrates could be formed in a separate reactor not associated or connected to the main pipelines for the wellstream. For example,
In one or more additional embodiments of the present invention, dry hydrates are generated subsea in a cold-flow reactor using static mixers. In one or more embodiments, the cold-flow reactor can be a small-diameter pipe having a diameter of about 0.5-10 cm, preferably about 0.5-5 cm, and more preferably about 1-3 cm. The static mixer forms small water dispersions in oil that result in rapid conversion of water to hydrates without agglomeration. Alternatively, small water droplet dispersions can be formed by flowing a full wellstream through a nozzle. However, a nozzle would result in a very large differential pressure.
No large differential pressure results from static mixing or from “sticky” hydrates, since the latter are not present. Unexpected shut-ins can be handled several ways. For example, the static mixing segment of the dry hydrate reactor can be placed above the full wellstream pipe at the point where fluids are sampled for the dry hydrate reactor. If the static mixer is in an inclined position relative to the outlet of the dry hydrate reactor, dry hydrates will slump to the reactor inlet. Liquid water will drain back into the full wellstream pipe. In another example, the small-diameter pipe of the dry hydrate reactor can be lower than and displaced by the dry hydrated full wellstream downstream of the point where the seeds and the full wellstream mix. Dry hydrates can be re-started with the normal pipeline operating pressure. There is no need to de-pressurize the pipeline and restart at low pressure to avoid solid hydrate deposition and plugging. An advantage of static mixers is that the seed cold-flow reactor will not need to be operated at low volumetric gas fraction to be effective in generating dry hydrates with static mixers. The cold-flow reactor containing the static mixer or mixers can be in fluid communication with the wellstream through a sidestream taken from the wellstream either directly or indirectly. Alternatively, if the gas concentration is sufficiently low, the static mixer can be placed directly in the wellstream itself. In this embodiment, a portion of the wellstream pipeline itself serves as the cold-flow reactor for forming the dry hydrates. In one or more embodiments the gas volume fraction is less than 10 percent of full wellstream without static mixers. The gas volume fraction can be between about 0-50% with static mixers.
In one or more additional embodiments of the present invention, dry hydrates are generated subsea in a cold flow reactor section of the main pipeline using static mixers. In one or more embodiments, the cold-flow reactor section can be one or more static mixers. The static mixer forms small water dispersions in oil that result in rapid conversion of water to hydrates without agglomeration. Gas is also dispersed by the static mixer(s), thus avoiding other mechanisms of forming sticky hydrates. No large differential pressure results from static mixing or from “sticky” hydrates, since the latter are not present.
Unexpected shut-ins can be handled several ways. For example, thermodynamic inhibitors, such as methanol or glycols, may be injected upstream and/or downstream of the static mixing segment of the main pipeline before planned shut-in, during shut-in and/or after startup. Alternatively, low dose hydrate inhibitors may be injected upstream and/or downstream of the static mixing segment of the main pipeline before planned shut-in, during shut-in and/or after startup. Specifically, an anti-agglomerate may be injected before, during and/or after shut-in to facilitate hydrate slurry formation.
The main pipeline may split into two sections: (1) A cold flow section with static mixers or other dry hydrate generating equipment and (2) an unobstructed pipeline section for the purpose of bypassing the cold flow section while pigging the main pipeline. An advantage of static mixers is that the cold-flow reactor section will not need to be operated at low volumetric gas fraction to be effective in generating dry hydrates with static mixers. In this embodiment, the cold-flow reactor containing the static mixer or mixers receives most or all of the fluid in the full wellstream directly from the pipeline. In this embodiment, a portion of the wellstream pipeline itself serves as the cold-flow reactor for forming the dry hydrates. The static mixers used according to embodiments of the present invention serve to disperse the water and the gas in the wellstream fluids into smaller water and gas droplets that are relatively quickly and completely converted into dry hydrates without requiring seed hydrates. That is, the hydrates are formed directly in the full wellstream without a sidestream generator/reactor. Gas and/or water separation may be included in the main pipeline before the cold flow generating section.
The static mixers used according to embodiments of the present invention serve to disperse the water and the gas in the wellstream fluids into smaller water and gas droplets that are relatively quickly and completely converted into dry hydrates without recycling the hydrates. That is, the hydrates are formed and then placed directly into the wellstream without being circulated in a recycle loop.
Water droplet diameter has been determined to affect dry hydrate formation. When there is no gas phase, the water does not have to be dispersed in 1-30 micron droplets to form dry hydrates. Smaller water droplet diameters are believed to be generally better for dry hydrate formation, but it is believed that a wide range of water droplet diameters may be employed. Thus, in one or more embodiments, the dry hydrates used in embodiments of the present invention are formed using water droplets having diameters less than or equal to about 30 microns, or less than or equal to about 15 microns, or less than or equal to about 10 microns, or less than or equal to about 7 microns. Droplet diameter is known to depend on the droplet and continuous phase viscosity, shear rate (or fluid velocity), and interfacial tension between the droplet and continuous phase. In a static mixer, the droplet diameter is decreased because shear rate is increased. The relationship between droplet diameter and the above factors is well known to those of skill in the art and can be calculated using known relationships.
The water droplets tend to coalesce downstream of the static mixer section. Gravity is a strong promoter of coalescence, so the whole reactor preferably contains static mixers, the reactor preferably should be oriented vertically, or the reactor diameter may be made as large as practical to minimize coalescence during the hydrate formation stage. Filling the entire line with mixers can impose unnecessary pressure drop. Shorter settle distances in the horizontal pipe are conducive to greater droplet coalescence, so proportionally little is gained by increased pipe diameter. Therefore, vertical orientation is the preferred method, though combinations of methods could be implemented.
To effectively package a vertically oriented static mixer assembly in the distance that may be required for complete or nearly complete hydrate formation, one or more embodiments of the present invention may employ staging of alternating upward-downward flowing section in a dry hydrate reactor. Such an embodiment is illustrated in
A dry seed scale-up design according to one or more embodiments of the present invention may involve multiple staged reactors of increasing capacity. Staging would ensure the most effective conversion of all water in the wellstream to dry hydrate. An example of such an embodiment employing a three reactor design is shown in
Water droplet surface area is maximized by maximizing the fluid flow rate through the static mixer reactor section, or in other words, increasing the Reynolds number. This requirement may lead to preference for small diameter vertical static mixer reactor designs versus large diameter horizontal reactors.
In “Continuous formation of CO2 hydrate via a Kenics-type static mixer,” Energy & Fuels, Vol. 18, pp. 1451-1456, 2004, author Tajima et al. published data for mean droplet diameter with Weber number for a stream of CO2 in water (without a liquid hydrocarbon), from which a pumpable hydrate slurry was obtained for CO2 sequestration in the ocean. Using a Lasentec® D600X particle size analyzer, water droplet distributions were measured, by the present inventors, as a function of the Weber number in both dodecane and in a crude oil, as shown in
In another embodiment of the present invention, dry hydrates are generated subsea in a small-diameter pipe cold-flow reactor by excluding most of the gas phase. This is done by passive separation of liquids from gas. The hydrates formed by this method are not sticky. The low gas fluid forms small hydrate particles that disperse in oil with rapid conversion of water to hydrates without agglomeration. No large differential pressure results were observed in this embodiment of the present invention. Since “sticky” hydrates were not generated, no large differential pressure was observed. Unexpected shut-ins can be handled in several ways. For example, the dry hydrate seed reactor can be placed above the full wellstream pipe at the point where fluids are sampled for the dry hydrate reactor. If most of the reactor inclines in the direction of flow toward the outlet of the dry hydrate reactor, dry hydrates will slump to the reactor inlet. Liquid water will drain back into the full wellstream pipe. Another example: the small-diameter pipe of the dry hydrate reactor can be lower than and displaced by the dry hydrated full wellstream downstream of the point where the seeds and the full wellstream mix. Dry hydrates can be re-started with the normal pipeline operating pressure. Dry hydrates can be held in the reactor by way of standard gate valves such as are in use in most petroleum pipelines.
One advantage of this embodiment is the elimination of the pressure drop anticipated with the use of the static mixers.
The use of an ultra-low gas volume in a pipe where oil and water are flowing to form small diameter hydrates is believed to provide unexpected results.
In one such embodiment, the pipe is preferably over-filled (95% oil and 5% water) to eliminate the gas/water interface and hydrate plug formation. Dendritic hydrate formation can be forced by mass transfer limiting the gas phase in the oil phase. As shown in
In flow loop experiments where a gas space is present above the liquid volume, “sticky” hydrates are formed. The “sticky” hydrates appear as large slush-like aggregates that induce large pressure drops across the loop.
In surprising contrast, dry hydrates are observed to form when little or no gas phase is present at the same formation conditions. These have the appearance of fine silt which would settle out when the fluid flow is stopped. While producing these dry hydrates, very little increase of pressure drop occurred across the loop.
In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides another passive method of forming small diameter dry hydrates by using a falling film reactor as the cold-flow reactor. The design of falling film reactors is well known in the chemical industry. For example, most detergents are manufactured in falling film reactors. There are both large scale and micro-reactor-scale falling film reactor designs. All of these reactors have the advantage of large surface-to-volume ratio that allows for enhanced process control and heat management. Various reactor designs incorporate single tubes, multi-tubes and parallel plates. Hydrates formed by a falling film of water, oil and gas will be small in diameter. Falling film reactors have no moving parts, making this process highly reliable for subsea application.
The energy required for a falling film reactor can be provided by the temperatures of the reacting fluids by maintaining proper fluid flow ratios. An energy balance on a closed, falling film reactor can be determined using equations and methods well known to those of skill in the art. Such energy balance calculations show that the closed reactor system can be designed to produce hydrate without dependence on outside convection. A reactor would convey heat to the surroundings, and could be engineered with exterior fins to maximize convection.
In another embodiment of the present invention, static mixers are used for mixing the seed hydrates with the full wellstream being seeded in order to achieve maximum mass transfer and heat transfer for efficient conversion of water to hydrates. This process uses a static mixer in the main pipeline at the point where dry seed hydrates, produced by any of the embodiments discussed above, are combined with the full wellstream. This will result in more rapid dispersion of the liquid water with the dry hydrate seeds, avoiding possible large hydrate masses being formed due to poor mixing of the two streams or poor heat transfer during hydrate formation in the main pipeline.
In another embodiment, the present invention provides a small rough-walled pipe to achieve the same result as static mixers, i.e., high shear fields for small droplet formation. The same pipe may be of the same sizes as the pipe discussed above with regard to static mixers in the cold-flow reactor concept.
The pressure drop per unit length that results from a dodecane suspension flowing in a tube can be readily determined as a function of Re (Reynolds number) at several We (Weber number) by those of skill in the art. As can be determined from
As an example of the foregoing, if a 600 ft long reactor was used, in a ½ inch diameter reactor, the flow rate at We=200 would be 2.23 ft/s and Re=7350. The pressure drop across a reactor would be 114 psi. The residence time of fluid in the reactor would be 5 minutes. Freer et al. in “Methane hydrate film growth kinetics,” Vol. 185, pp. 65-75, 2001 measured methane hydrate film growth rates of 325 micron/s at 38° F. and 1314 psia. Therefore, 100 micron diameter droplets should be consumed on the order of a second and should have sufficient time for conversion.
The formation of dry hydrates and the growth of such hydrates are affected by many factors. The gas composition in the reactor and the pipeline preferably does not change during hydrate formation as this may decrease the thermodynamic potential and kinetic driving force for hydrate formation, thereby slowing the hydrate formation rate and requiring that the reactor be designed much longer than otherwise expected. The following factors play a large role in whether composition changes significantly: 1) operating pressure (the higher the better; preferably greater than 3000 psig); 2) water cut (the lower the better; preferably less than 10 volume %); and 3) initial gas composition (the closer to composition in the hydrate, the better; preferably greater than 8 mole % ethane, propane, butanes and/or pentanes).
High operating pressures are preferred since proportionally smaller mole fractions of gas are consumed for the same amount of hydrate formed. Lower water cut results in less hydrate formed, so smaller mole fractions of gas are consumed. The azeotrope condition is where hydrate is consuming the gas in the same proportion as the gas composition, resulting in no composition change.
The hydrate gas fraction (whether dissolved in liquid oil or present as a gas phase) is preferably sufficient to convert all of the water in the reactor to dry hydrates. The preferred condition is for the hydrate gas components to be dissolved in the oil phase. The reason is that large gas bubbles in the reactor may lead to large hydrate particles that trap liquid water that is not completely converted to hydrates, resulting in “sticky” hydrates. Either the water quantity is preferably less than the dissolved hydrate gases can convert to hydrates or the oil is preferably capable of being re-saturated with hydrate gases before the fluids exit the reactor. Therefore, a seed reactor design will take into account the rate of consumption of hydrate gases dissolved in the liquid and the rate of re-saturation of the oil.
Preferably, the temperature of the dry hydrate reactor balances the need to keep the reactor short by using as low a temperature as is possible, and keeping the hydrate formation rate slow enough to avoid agglomeration of partially converted water droplets. Similarly, the temperature of the mixing zone of dry hydrate seeds with the full wellstream liquid water is crucial as the liquid water is preferably prevented from forming sticky hydrates faster than the dry hydrate seeds convert the liquid water to dry hydrates.
In another aspect of the invention, any one or a number of the above methods and systems for transporting hydrocarbons can be used in a method or system to produce hydrocarbons from the wellhead. The hydrocarbons are preferably in liquid form and 50% or more of the total liquid volume is hydrocarbon and less than 50% of the total pipeline volume is gas. In yet another embodiment, the present invention is a method of producing hydrocarbons, comprising: providing a well in a hydrocarbon reservoir; producing a wellstream comprising hydrocarbons and water from said well; diverting a sidestream of said wellstream into a cold-flow reactor, said cold-flow reactor having one or more static mixers positioned therein; passing said sidestream through said one or more static mixers; converting at least a portion of the water in said sidestream to dry hydrates without recycling said dry hydrates through said cold-flow reactor or through said one or more static mixers; feeding said dry hydrates into said wellstream to convert substantially all of the water in said wellstream to dry hydrates, thereby forming a wellstream comprising dry hydrates and hydrocarbons; transporting said wellstream comprising dry hydrates and hydrocarbons through a pipeline; recovering said hydrocarbons from said pipeline. It has been observed that when dry hydrate seeds are combined with a stream containing liquid water, the seed particle diameters grow proportionally to the cube root of the water-to-seed volume ratio.
In still another embodiment, the present invention provides a method of producing hydrocarbons, comprising: providing a well in a hydrocarbon reservoir; producing a wellstream comprising hydrocarbons and water from said well; diverting a sidestream of said wellstream into a cold-flow reactor; converting at least a portion of the water in said sidestream to dry hydrates without recycling said dry hydrates through said cold-flow reactor; feeding said dry hydrates into said wellstream to convert substantially all of the water in said wellstream to dry hydrates, thereby forming a wellstream comprising dry hydrates and hydrocarbons; transporting said wellstream comprising dry hydrates and hydrocarbons through a pipeline; recovering said hydrocarbons from said pipeline.
In yet further embodiments, there is provided a method of producing hydrocarbons, comprising: providing a well in a hydrocarbon reservoir; producing a wellstream comprising hydrocarbons and water from said well; passing part or all of said wellstream through a cold-flow reactor, said cold-flow reactor having one or more static mixers disposed therein; reducing the droplet size of said water in part or all of said wellstream by passing part or all of said wellstream through said one or more static mixers; converting at least a portion of said water into dry hydrates; feeding said dry hydrates into said wellstream to convert substantially all of the water in said wellstream to dry hydrates, thereby forming a wellstream comprising dry hydrates and hydrocarbons; transporting said wellstream comprising dry hydrates and hydrocarbons through a pipeline; and recovering said hydrocarbons from said pipeline. The cold-flow reactor can be positioned within or form part of the pipeline. Alternatively, the cold-flow reactor is positioned external to the pipeline, in which case the cold-flow reactor receives a sidestream of said wellstream.
Another aspect of the invention is a method of producing hydrocarbons from a reservoir and passing the hydrocarbons or a sidestream thereof through a reactor having one or more static mixers so as to convert the wax in the hydrocarbon stream into particles in the stream rather than depositing the wax in the walls of the pipe through which the stream flows. The stream leaving the reactor contains solidified wax particles since the fluid has passed through the temperature and pressure regime where the wax forms. Thus the wax is not deposited as a coating on the pipe since it forms during a turbulent flow from the static mixers rather than depositing laminarly on the walls of the pipe. The normal wax deposition in laminar flow is attributable to the temperature gradient decline from the center flow to the walls.
While the present invention may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, the exemplary embodiments discussed above have been shown by way of example. However, it should again be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed herein. Indeed, the present techniques of the invention are to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.
This application is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US07/04736, filed 22 Feb. 2007 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/782,449, filed 15 Mar. 2006 and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 60/899,000, filed 2 Feb. 2007.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2007/004736 | 2/22/2007 | WO | 00 | 7/28/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/095399 | 8/23/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3372753 | Tuttle | Mar 1968 | A |
3514274 | Cahn et al. | May 1970 | A |
4267043 | Benson | May 1981 | A |
4328098 | Benson | May 1982 | A |
4589434 | Kelley | May 1986 | A |
4687585 | Ramshaw | Aug 1987 | A |
4697426 | Knowles, Jr. | Oct 1987 | A |
4883582 | McCants | Nov 1989 | A |
4915176 | Sugier et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4973775 | Sugier et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5055178 | Sugier et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5178641 | Konrad et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5244878 | Sugier et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5283001 | Gregoli et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5284581 | Benson | Feb 1994 | A |
5286376 | Benson | Feb 1994 | A |
5426258 | Thomas et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5427680 | Benson | Jun 1995 | A |
5434323 | Durand et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5491269 | Colle et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5536893 | Gudmundsson | Jul 1996 | A |
5600044 | Colle et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5676848 | Benson | Oct 1997 | A |
5744665 | Costello et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5816280 | Rojey et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5817898 | Delion et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841010 | Rabeony et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5863301 | Grosso et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5874660 | Colle et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877361 | Rojey et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879561 | Klomp et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888407 | Benson | Mar 1999 | A |
5893642 | Hewitt et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5900516 | Talley et al. | May 1999 | A |
5936040 | Costello et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941096 | Gudmundsson | Aug 1999 | A |
5954950 | Morel et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958844 | Sinquin et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6015929 | Rabeony et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6028233 | Colle et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028234 | Heinemann et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6080704 | Halliday et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6082118 | Endrizzi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6102986 | Klug | Aug 2000 | A |
6107531 | Colle et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6177497 | Klug et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6180843 | Heinemann et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6194622 | Peiffer et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6281274 | Bakeev et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6307191 | Waycuilis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331508 | Pakulski | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6350928 | Waycuilis et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6359047 | Thieu et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369121 | Catalfamo et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6412135 | Benson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6444852 | Milburn et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451892 | Bakeev et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6550960 | Catalfamo et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6566309 | Klug et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6656366 | Fung et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6672391 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6703534 | Waycuilis et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6756021 | Botrel | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6774276 | Lund et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6867262 | Angel et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6957146 | Taner et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6988550 | Bragg et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7008466 | Collins | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7121339 | Bragg et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7183240 | Dahlmann et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7225078 | Shelley et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7253138 | Dahlmann et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261810 | Argo et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7264653 | Panchalingam et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7281844 | Glanville | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7397976 | Mendez et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7511180 | Waycuilis | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7541009 | Takao et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7611683 | Grund et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7615516 | Yang et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7856848 | Lu | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7947857 | Nazari et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7958939 | Talley | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7994374 | Talley et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8034748 | Dahlmann et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8047296 | Tian et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20040129609 | Argo et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133531 | Chen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143145 | Servio et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040176650 | Lund et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050137432 | Matthews et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060009363 | Crews | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060058449 | Angel et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084581 | Bragg et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060106265 | Rivers et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060175062 | Benson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060175063 | Balkanyi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060186023 | Balkanyi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205603 | Colle et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060254766 | Richard et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060272805 | O'Malley et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070276169 | Tohidi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080023071 | Smith et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080064611 | Spratt | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080101999 | Balczewski | May 2008 | A1 |
20080102000 | Balczewski | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103343 | Balczewski | May 2008 | A1 |
20090124520 | Tohidi | May 2009 | A1 |
20090235850 | Caro et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100012325 | Friedemann | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100099807 | Carlise et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100099814 | Conrad et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100145115 | Lund et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100180952 | Verhelst et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100193194 | Stoisits et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100236634 | Nuland et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110220352 | Lund et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110308625 | Stoisits et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2036084 | Aug 1991 | CA |
1429896 | Jul 2003 | CN |
1429896 | May 2005 | CN |
0526929 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0566394 | Jun 1996 | EP |
1159238 | Aug 2008 | EP |
1957856 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2003041271 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003055676 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003 055676 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003041271 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2004182885 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004197006 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004346184 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005008347 | Jan 2005 | JP |
WO9325798 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO9517579 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO9634177 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9817941 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO9913197 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 0025062 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 2004063314 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2005026291 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005058450 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2006027609 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2006048666 | May 2006 | WO |
WO2006052455 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2006054076 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2006068929 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO2007025062 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO2007095399 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2008023979 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO2009008737 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2009054733 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO2010083095 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO2011062720 | May 2011 | WO |
WO2011062793 | May 2011 | WO |
WO2011109118 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Erik M. Freer et al., “Methane hydrate film growth kinetics”, Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2001, pp. 65-75, vol. 185, Elsevier Science B.V. |
Nimalan Gnanendran et al., “Modelling hydrate formation kinetics of a hydrate promoter-water-natural gas system in a semi-batch spray reactor”, Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, pp. 3849-3863, vol. 59, Elsevier Science B.V. |
C. D. Grace, “Static Mixing and Heat Transfer”, Chemical and Processing Engineering, 1971, pp. 57-59. |
T. Johnson et al., “Looking for Hydrates in Places Other Than Flowlines and Pipelines”, OTC17345, 2005 Offshore Technology Conference, May 2-5, 2005, 4 pages, Houston, TX. |
R. Larsen et al., “Conversion of Water to Hydrate Particles”, SPE 71550, SPE Annual Technical Conference, Sep. 30-Oct. 3, 2001, pp. 1-5, New Orleans, LA. |
Ju Dong Lee et al., “Methane-ethane and methane-propane hydrate formation and decomposition on water droplets”, Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, pp. 4203-4212, vol. 60, Elsevier Science B.V. |
K. N. Li et al., “Experimental Research on the Influence of Jet Pump on the Cooling Storage Property of Gas Hydates”, International Journal of Modern Physics B, 2005, pp. 507-509, vol. 19 Nos. 1, 2 & 3, World Scientific Publishing Company. |
M. Mork et al., “Rate of Hydrate Formation in Subsea Pipelines, Correlation Based on Reactor Experiments”, 12th International Oil Field Chemistry Symposium, Apr. 1-4, 2001, 11 pages, Geilo Norway. |
Hideo Tajima et al., “Continuous Formation of Gas Hydrate by Static Mixing”, Preprints—American Chemical Society, Division of Petroleum Chemistry, 2005, 2 pages, 50(1). |
Hideo Tajima et al., “Continuous Formation of Co2 Hydrate via a Kenics-Type Static Mixer”, Energy & Fuels, 2004, pp. 1451-1456, vol. 18, American Chemical Society. |
Hideo Tajima et al., “Continuous Gas Hydrate Formation Process by Static Mixing of Fluids”, 5th International Conference on Gas Hydrates, Jun. 12-16, 2005, 6 pages, Trondheim, Norway. |
Yingming Xie et al., “Gas hydrate fast nucleation from melting ice and quiescent growth along vertical heat transfer tube”, Science in China, Series B, 2005, pp. 75-82, vol. 48/1. |
European Search Report No. 113890, dated Sep. 5, 2006, 3 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, Apr. 28, 2008, 6 pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Sep. 25, 2008, 5 pages. |
Hemmingson, P. V. et al. (2008) “Hydrate Plugging Potential in Underinhibited Systems”, Proc. of the 6th ICGH, Vancouver, Canada. |
Ida, Hiroyuki et al. (2004) “Highly Efficient Natural Gas Hydrate Production Technology,” Jfe Giho, v. 6 pp. 76-80 (ISSN 13480669). |
Ilahi, M. (2005) “Evaluation of Cold Flow Concepts,” Masters Thesis, Norwegian Univ. of Sci. And Tech., Jun. 2005, 123 pages. |
Rogers, R. et al. (2006) “Gas Hydrate Storage of Natural Gas,” Doe #De-FC26-01NT41297, Jul. 13, 2006, 79 pages. |
Sloan, E. D. (1997) “Gas Hydrate Tutorial,” Preprints-Meeting of the ACS Division of Fuel Chemistry, v. 42, No. 2, pp. 449-456 (American Chemical Society, 1997). |
Talley, L. et al. (1999) “First Low Dosage Hydrate Inhibitor is Field Proven in Deepwater,” Pipeline and Gas Journal, v. 44, p. 226. |
Talley, L. et al. (2001) “Comparison of Laboratory Results on Hydrate Induction Rates in a THF Rig, High-Pressure Rocking Cell, Miniloop, and Large Flowloop,” Gas Hydrates, Challenges for the Future: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, v.912, pp. 314-321. |
Urdahl, O. et al. (1997) “Experimental Testing and Evaluation of a Kinetic Gas Hydrate Inhibitor in Different Fluid Systems,” Preprints-Meeting of the ACS Div. of Fuel Chemistry, v. 42, pp. 498-502. |
Valberg, T. (2006) “Efficiency of Thermodynamic Inhibitors for Melting Gas Hydrates,” Master's Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090078406 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60782449 | Mar 2006 | US | |
60899000 | Feb 2007 | US |