Method of Immunization Against The 4 Dengue Serotypes

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20080085288
  • Publication Number
    20080085288
  • Date Filed
    October 02, 2007
    16 years ago
  • Date Published
    April 10, 2008
    16 years ago
Abstract
The invention relates to a method for inducing a protection against the 4 dengue serotypes in a patient, comprising (a) a first series of administrations (i) of a dose of a vaccinal dengue virus of a first serotype and of a dose of a vaccinal dengue virus of a second serotype, and (ii) of a dose of a vaccinal dengue virus of a third serotype and of a dose of a vaccinal dengue virus of a fourth serotype, and(b) a second series of administrations of doses (i) and (ii), in which the doses (i) and (ii) are administered simultaneously at separate anatomical sites, andin which the second series (b) is implemented at least 30 days to at most 12 months after the first series (a).
Description
EXAMPLES
Example 1
Immunization in Monkeys by Simultaneous Injection of Two Bivalent Compositions at Separate Anatomical Sites

The viremia and the immunogenicity were tested in a monkey model. The viremia, in particular, was identified as one of the factors associated with the virulence and the severity of the disease in man and therefore constitutes an important parameter to be taken into consideration. The immunogenicity is, for its part, a key parameter in the context of the evaluation of the protection conferred.


1.1 Materials and Methods:


The experiments in monkeys were carried out according to the European Directives relating to animal experimentation. The immunizations were carried out in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) originating from Mauritania. The monkeys were placed in quarantine for six weeks before immunization.


The monkeys were immunized subcutaneously in the arms with 0.5 ml of vaccinal composition. After a light anesthesia with ketamine (Imalgene, Merial), blood was collected by puncture from the inguinal or saphenous veins. At day 0 and 28 following each immunization, 5 ml of blood were sampled in order to evaluate the antibody responses, while, between days 2 and 10, 1 ml of blood was sampled in order to evaluate the viremia. The blood was collected on ice and stored on ice until serum separation. To do this, the blood was centrifuged for 20 minutes at 4° C. and the serum collected was stored at −80° C. until the time of the tests.


Measurement of Viremia


The post-vaccinal viremias were monitored by quantitative real-time RP-PCR (qRT-PCR). Two sets of primers and of probes located in the NS5 gene of the DEN1 and DEN2 strains were used to quantify the VDV-1 RNA and VDV-2 RNA, respectively. A third set of 2 primers and of 1 probe located in the NS5 gene of the YF virus was used to quantify the CYD RNA. Finally, 4 sets of primers and of probes specific for the various CYD serotypes, located at the junction of the E (DEN)/NS1 (YF) genes were used to identify the serotype in the samples positive for the YF NS5 RNA (see also table I). 7 plasmids containing, under the control of the T7 promoter, the region targeted by each PCR were transcribed in vitro so as to generate a series of synthetic RNAs which were included as an internal reference in each RT-PCR assay. These synthetic RNAs were assayed by spectrophotometry, and the amount of RNA obtained was converted to number of RNA copies and expressed as GEQ (genomic equivalents).


0.140 ml of monkey serum was extracted using the Macherey Nagel “Nucleospin 96 virus™” RNA extraction kit, according to the manufacturer's instructions, and then the purified RNA was eluted with 0.140 ml (0.090 ml, then 0.05 ml) of RNase-free water. In order to avoid repeated freezing/thawing cycles, a first quantification was carried out immediately after the extraction, on 5 μl of said RNA preparation. The remaining volume was frozen at 70° C.


The reaction mixtures contained, in addition to the components of the “Qiagen Qauntitect™ probes” RT-PCR quantification kit (Qiagen), 10 picomol of each primers, 4 picomol of each probe and 5 μl of RNA, in the total volume of 25 μl. In the case of the RNAs to be tested, 5 μl of the purified preparation were directly introduced into the reaction mixture, without any prior dilution step. The synthetic RNAs were diluted to 1/10 in RNAse-free water, and 7 dilutions containing approximately 10 to 106 GEQ in 5 μl were quantified in parallel in order to generate the standard curve.


The quantification reactions were carried out on the Applied Biosystem ABIPrism 700™ device, using the following program: 50° C./30 min, 95° C./15 min, then 40 cycles of 95° C./15 sec-60° C./60 sec.


The limit of quantification of the viral RNA in this test is from 2.9 to 3.3 log10GEQ/ml (800 to 2000 GEQ/ml; 4 to 10 GEQ/reaction), according to the PCR targets (standard deviation: +/−0.3 log10).


The correlation between the infectious titer and the viral RNA quantification was established in parallel to the assays, by analysis of 0.140 ml of negative monkey serum samples (DO) to which a known amount of infectious particles of the viruses which were used for the immunization (CYD or VDV) were added. Said control sera were prepared at two dilutions containing approximately 1 PFU and approximately 100 PFU in 5 μl (2.3 and 4.3 log10 PFU/ml, respectively).


In the tests used in the examples, the correlation between GEQ and PFU is the following:GEQ/PFU ratio of 2.7 log10 (i.e.: 1 PFU=500 GEQ) for the sera positive for YF or CYDs. GEQ/PFU ratio of 2.5 log10 (i.e.: 1 PFU=320 GEQ) for the sera positive for VDVL or VDV2.


The quantification limits being <3.3 log10GEQ/ml (i.e.: <4 PFU/ml) for qRT-PCR YF and CYDs and <2.9 log10GEQ/ml (i.e.: <2.5 PFU/ml) for qRT-PCR VDV1 and VDV2.


The primers and probes used are given in table 1 below, in which are listed, in order, for each assay, the sense and antisense primers and the probe.











TABLE 1







sequence




















Y
YF-NS5
sense
5′ GCACGGATGTAACAGACTGAAGA (23 bases)



F
YF NS5
anti
5′ CCAGGCCGAACCTGTCAT (18 bases)



YF-NS5

5′ Fam- CGACTGTGTGGTCCGGCCCATC-Tamra (22 bases)





CYD1
CYD1-
sense
5′ CATTGC AGT TGG CCT GGT AA (20 b)


spe
CYD1-
anti
5′ CTT TGG CAA GAG AGA GCT CAA GT (23 b)



CYD1-

5′ Fam-CCG ATC AAG GAT GCG CCA TCA-Tamra (21 b)





CYD2
CYD2-
sense
5′ GTG GGA GTC GTG ACG CTG TA (20 b)


spe
CYD2-
anti
5′ GTT GAT GGC GCA TCC TTG ATC (21 b)



CYD2-

5′ Fam-TGG GAG TTA TGG TGG GCG CCG-Tamra (21 b)





CYD3
CYD3-
sense
5′ AAA ACA CTT CCA TGT CAT TTT CAT G (25 b)


spe
CYD3-
anti
5′ GTT GAT GGC GCA TCC TTG ATC (21 b)



CYD3-

5′ Fam-TGCGATAGGAATTATCACACTCTATCTGGGAGC-Tamra (33 b)





CYD4
CYD4-
sense
5′ CTT A GT ATT GTG GAT TGG CAC GAA (24 b)


spe
CYD4-
anti
5′ GCG CCA ACT GTG AAA CCT AGA (21 b)



CYD4-

5′ -Fam-AGAAACACTTCAATGGCAATGACGTGCAT-Tamra (29 b)





VDV1
VDV1-NS5
sense
5′ TCG CAA CAG CCT TAA CAG C (19 b)


spe
VDV1-NS5
anti
5′ ACT ATC TCC CTC CCA TCC TTC (21 b)



VDV1-NS5

5′ Fam-TTC ACA CCA CTT CCA C-M GB/NFQ (16 b)





VDV2
VDV2-NS5
sense
5′ AAT GAC AGA CAC GACC TCC (18 b)


spec
VDV2-NS5
anti
5′ CCC AAA ACC TAC TAT CTT CAA C (22 b)



VDV2-NS5

5′ Fam-TGG AAG TCG GCA CGT GA-MGB/NFQ (17 b)









Measurement of Neutralizing Antibodies (Seroneutralization Test) (SN50)


Conventionally, the dengue antibody measurement is established using the PRNT50 (50% PFU number reduction neutralization test). Since this test is laborious and uses up a lot of material, we developed the SN50 test, based on 50% reduction in the number of units measured in a CClD50 test.


In a 96-well plate, 0.120 ml of each decomplemented serum is added to 0.480 ml of diluent (ISCOVE 4% FCS) per well. 6-fold serial dilutions are prepared by transfer of 0.150 ml of serum into 0.450 ml of diluent. 450 μl of virtual dilution at 2.7 log10 CCID50/ml are added to each well so as to obtain 25 CCID50/well. The plate is incubated at 37° C. for 1 hour. 0.1 ml of each dilution is then distributed into 6 wells of a 96-well plate into which VERO cells had been seeded 3 days before the beginning of the experiment at a density of 8000 cells/well, in 0.1 ml of ISCOVE medium containing 4% FCS. After incubation at 37° C. for 6 days, in the presence of 5% CO2, the cells are fixed with an ethanol/acetone (70/30) mixture at 4° C. for 15 minutes, and then washed 3 times in PBS and incubated for 1 h at 37° C. in the presence of 0.05 ml of a 1/2000 dilution of an anti-flavivirus monoclonal antibody (mAb 4G2). The plates are then washed twice and incubated for 1 h at 37° C. in the presence of 0.05 ml of a 1/1000 dilution of an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG. The lysis plaques are visualized by adding 0.05 ml of a colored substrate: BCIP/NBT. The neutralizing antibody titers are calculated using the Karber formula as defined below:





log10SN50=d+f/N(X+N/2),


in which:


d represents the dilution resulting in 100% neutralization (i.e. 6 negative replicates, i.e. replicates exhibiting no sign of infection)


f: represents the dilution factor in log 10 (e.g. dilution factor of 1:4, f=0.6)


N: represents the number of replicates/dilution (N=6)
X: total number of wells exhibiting no sign of infection, with the exception of the dilution d

The limit of viral detection is 10 SN50 (i.e. 1.0 log10SN50).


The viral strains which were used for the neutralization are the DEN1 16007, DEN2 16681, DEN3 16562 or DEN4 1036 strains. For the controls, the initial viral dilutions were re-titrated. The correlation between the neutralizing titer measured in the SN50 test and the neutralizing titer measured conventionally in the PRNT50 test is: log10PRNT50=log10SN50+0.2


The mean titer (GMT) is established by calculating the geometric mean of the titers expressed in linear value; the samples for which the titer is less than the detection threshold are, by convention, assigned a value equal to half this threshold.


1.2 Evaluation of the Sequential Immunizations


2 groups of 4 monkeys of equivalent age and weight were immunized (see table 2).


The immunization was carried out subcutaneously in the arm, with a 23G1 needle, at a dose of 105 CCID50 for each serotype for the CYD DEN 1 to 4 vaccines.









TABLE 2







Composition of the groups and immunization protocol


Monkeys










Immunizations










Group
D0
D58





1
CYD-1,2 in one arm
CYD-1,2 in one arm



CYD-3,4 in the other arm
CYD-3,4 in the other arm


2
CYD-1,2,3,4
CYD-1,2,3,4









The immunogenicity results obtained after one immunization (D28) and two immunizations (D86) are given in table 3.


The viremia results are given in table 4.









TABLE 3







SN50 neutralizing titer (units 1/dil)








Monkeys












Immunizations
D + 28
D58 + 28


















Group
ID
D0
D58
DEN-1
DEN-2
DEN-3
DEN-4
DEN-1
DEN-2
DEN-3
DEN-4





















2001
AP545
CYD-1,2
CYD-1,2
20
25

50
40
50

319



AO949
in one
in one
20


20
319
20
13
100



AP335
arm
arm
20


252
100
16
10
200



AP817
CYD-3,4
CYD-3,4
20
16
32
40
319
25
32
402



geometric
in the
in the
20
10
 8
56
142
25
12
225



mean
other
other




arm
arm


2402
AP676
CYD-
CYD-
63


126
100


40



AQ005
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
25


63
50


63



AP961


50


158
80

80
400



AN073AQ163


63


40
100

16
252



geometric


47
<10 
<10 
84
80
<10 
13
126



mean





—: titer < 10













TABLE 4







Viremia analysis (units: log 10 GEQ/ml)










Primary immunization
Booster























Group
Monkey
D2
D3
D4
D6
D7
D8
D9
D10
D58
D59
D62
D63
D64
D65
D66





1
AP545
3.17



3.12
3.67
4.55
4.59









CYD1,2 + CYD3,4
AO949
3.93
3.66
3.34
4.57













2 points of
AP335
3.36
3.06
3.34
3.83
4.05
4.41
4.24
3.64









injection
AP817
4.17
3.99
3.61




2.89









2
AP676






3.65










CYD 1,2,3,4
AQ005
3.19

3.35




3.41









1 point of
AP961




3.86
3.42
3.29
3.56









injection
AQ163
3.18
3.16

3.30
3.60
2.95
3.00













Serotypes


CYD1


CYD2


CYD3


CYD4


CYD1 + 4






Briefly, the results can be summarized as follows:

    • The administration scheme according to the present invention makes it possible to qualitatively and quantitatively increase the homologous neutralizing antibody response which is obtained with the tetravalent immunization.
    • The bivalent immunization CYD-1,2 concomitant with a CYD-3,4 immunization carried out at a separate anatomical site induces, after booster, homologous responses against the four serotypes in all the monkeys, except for serotype 3 in one animal.
    • Furthermore, the responses against serotypes 1 and 4 have a tendency to be higher in the case of simultaneous bivalent immunizations than with tetravalent immunization at a single site.
    • The viremia (table 4) is predominantly caused by CYD-4 whether this is after simultaneous bivalent administration or tetravalent administration. It can therefore be concluded therefrom that separation of the serotypes does not promote the emergence of a serotype 1, 2 and 3 viremia.


The examples therefore show that the method of immunization according to the present invention improves the immunogenicity of the vaccinal dengue viruses without impairing the safety of the latter.


Example 2
Immunization by Simultaneous Injection of Two Bivalent Compositions CYD-1,4 and CYD-2,3 at Separate Anatomical Sites in Monkeys

The viremia and the immunogenicity were tested in the monkey model as in example 1. In the present example, the bivalent compositions tested contain, respectively, the most immunogenic vaccinal viruses (CYD-1,4) and the least immunogenic vaccinal viruses (CYD-2,3).


2.1 Materials and Methods: Identical to Example 1


2.2 Evaluation of the Simultaneous Immunizations


2 groups of 4 monkeys of equivalent age and weight were immunized (see table 5).


The immunization was carried out as described in example 1.









TABLE 5







Composition of the groups and immunization protocol


Monkeys










Immunizations










Group
D0
D58





1
CYD 1,4 in one arm
CYD 1,4 in one arm



CYD 2,3 in the other arm
CYD 2,3 in the other arm


2
CYD 1,2,3,4
CYD 1,2,3,4









The immunogenicity results obtained after one immunization (D28) and two immunizations (D86) are given in table 6.


The viremia results are similar to those obtained in example 1, showing a viremia induced by serotype 4 and no significant differences between the two groups.









TABLE 6







SN50 neutralizing titer (units 1/dil)








Monkeys












Immunizations
D0 + 28
D58 + 28


















Group
ID
D0
D58
DEN-1
DEN-2
DEN-3
DEN-4
DEN-1
DEN-2
DEN-3
DEN-4





















1
AR465
CYD 1,2,3,4
CYD 1,2,3,4
63
10
<
100
200
25
10
126



AR558


13
<
<
126
401
<
20
160



AR559


<
<
<
100
13
<
<
50



AR639


25
<
<
318
201
<
<
201



Geometric


20
<
<
142
119
<
<
119



mean


2
AR083
CYD 1,4 in
CYD 1,4 in
63
<
<
201
100
16
10
126



AR506
one arm
one arm
63
25
13
638
126
100 
32
201



AR610
CYD 2,3 in
CYD 2,3 in
63
20
<
100
159
50
40
253



AR644
the other arm
the other arm
40
<
<
40
505
80
40
100



Geometric


56
<
<
150
178
50
27
159



mean





<: titer < 10






The results support those obtained in example 1 and can be summarized as follows:

    • The administration scheme makes it possible to qualitatively and quantitatively increase the homologous neutralizing antibody response which is obtained with the tetravalent immunization.
    • The bivalent immunization CYD-1,4 concomitant with a CYD-2,3 immunization carried out at a separate anatomical site induces, after booster, homologous responses against the four serotypes in all the monkeys, which is not the case in the conventional tetravalent group, as seen in example 1.
    • Compared with those of the group of monkeys having received two bivalents CYD-1,2 and CYD-3,4 in example 1, the antibody titers observed after bivalent immunization CYD-1,4 concomitant with an immunization CYD-2,3 are higher for serotypes 1, 2 and 3 and lower for serotype 4, which shows a response that is better balanced between the 4 serotypes, with 4 being less dominant.
    • The separation of the dominant serotypes from the others in such an immunization scheme allowed a balanced response between the 4 serotypes to be obtained.


The two examples above therefore show that the method of immunization according to the present invention improves the immunogenicity of the vaccinal dengue viruses without impairing the safety of the latter as evaluated by measuring the viremia.

Claims
  • 1. A method for inducing a protection against the 4 dengue serotypes in a patient, comprising: (a) a first series of administrations (i) of a dose of a vaccinal dengue virus of a first serotype and of a dose of a vaccinal dengue virus of a second serotype, and (ii) of a dose of a vaccinal dengue virus of a third serotype and of a dose of a vaccinal dengue virus of a fourth serotype, and(b) a second series of administrations of doses (i) and (ii), in which the doses (i) and (ii) are administered simultaneously at separate anatomical sites, andin which the second series is implemented at least 30 days to at most 12 months after the first series.
  • 2. The method as claimed in claim 1, in which the vaccinal dengue viruses (i) are administered in the form of a single bivalent dose.
  • 3. The method as claimed in claim 1, in which the vaccinal dengue viruses (ii) are administered in the form of a single bivalent vaccinal dose.
  • 4. The method as claimed in claim 1, in which said vaccinal dengue virus serotype 1 is selected from the group consisting of the VDV1 strain and of a Chimerivax™ DEN-1.
  • 5. The method as claimed in claim 1, in which said vaccinal dengue virus serotype 2 is selected from the group consisting of the VDV2 strain and of a Chimerivax™ DEN-2.
  • 6. The method as claimed in claim 1, in which said vaccinal dengue virus serotype 1 is the VDV1 strain and said vaccinal dengue virus serotype 2 is the VDV2 strain.
  • 7. The method as claimed in claim 1, in which said vaccinal dengue virus serotype 1 is a Chimerivax™ DEN-1 and said vaccinal dengue virus serotype 2 is a Chimerivax™ DEN-2.
  • 8. The method as claimed in claim 1, in which said vaccinal dengue virus serotype 3 is a Chimerivax™ DEN-3.
  • 9. The method as claimed in claim 1, in which said vaccinal dengue virus serotype 4 is a Chimerivax™ DEN-4.
  • 10. The method as claimed in claim 1, in which the first and second serotypes are, respectively, CYD DEN-1 and CYD DEN-2 and the third and fourth serotypes are, respectively, CYD DEN-3 and CYD DEN-4.
  • 11. The method as claimed in claim 1, in which the amount of dengue vaccinal viruses serotypes 1, 2, 3 and 4 is within a range of from 103 to 106 CCID50.
  • 12. The method as claimed in claim 1, in which the vaccinal viruses used in the second series of administrations are identical to those used in the first series of administrations.
  • 13. The method as claimed in claim 1, in which the second series of administrations is implemented 30 days to 60 days after the first series of administrations.
  • 14. A kit for immunization against the dengue virus, comprising a container containing at least the vaccinal dengue viruses serotypes 1, 2, 3 and 4 (a) in the form of monovalent compositions contained in 4 separate containers, or(b) in the form of two bivalent compositions contained in 2 separate containers.
  • 15. The kit as claimed in claim 14, comprising at least: (a) a first container containing a bivalent vaccine comprising a Chimerivax™ DEN-1 and a Chimerivax™ DEN-2, and(b) a second container containing a bivalent vaccine comprising a Chimerivax™ DEN-3 and a Chimerivax™ DEN-4.
  • 16. The kit as claimed in claim 14, comprising at least: (a) a first container containing a bivalent vaccine comprising a Chimerivax™ DEN-1 and a Chimerivax™ DEN-3, and(b) a second container containing a bivalent vaccine comprising a Chimerivax™ DEN-2 and a Chimerivax™ DEN-4.
  • 17. A kit for immunization against the dengue virus, comprising a container containing at least the vaccinal dengue viruses of a first serotype and of a second serotype, (a) in the form of two monovalent compositions contained in 2 separate containers, or(b) in the form of a bivalent composition contained in 1 single container.
  • 18. The kit as claimed in claim 17, comprising at least: (a) a container containing a bivalent vaccine comprising a Chimerivax™ DEN-1 and a Chimerivax™ DEN-3, or(b) a container containing a bivalent vaccine comprising a Chimerivax™ DEN-2 and a Chimerivax™ DEN-4, or(c) a container containing a bivalent vaccine comprising a Chimerivax™ DEN-1 and a Chimerivax™ DEN-2, or(d) a container containing a bivalent vaccine comprising a Chimerivax™ DEN-3 and a Chimerivax™ DEN-4.
  • 19. A bivalent vaccine comprising an immunoeffective amount of the vaccinal dengue viruses of a first serotype and of a second serotype and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient.
  • 20. The bivalent vaccine as claimed in claim 19, comprising the vaccinal viruses selected from the group consisting of: Chimerivax™ DEN-1 and Chimerivax™ DEN-3; or Chimerivax™ DEN-2 and Chimerivax™ DEN-4; or Chimerivax™ DEN-1 and Chimerivax™ DEN-2; or Chimerivax™ DEN-3 and Chimerivax™ DEN-4.
  • 21. The use of doses of vaccinal dengue virus for the preparation of a vaccine for inducing a protection against the 4 dengue serotypes, comprising: (a) a first series of administrations (i) of a dose of a vaccinal dengue virus of a first serotype and of a dose of a vaccinal dengue virus of a second serotype, and (ii) of a dose of a vaccinal dengue virus of a third serotype and of a dose of a vaccinal dengue virus of a fourth serotype, and(b) a second series of administrations of doses (i) and (ii),in which the doses (i) and (ii) are administered simultaneously at separate anatomical sites, andin which the second series is implemented at least 30 days to at most 12 months after the first series.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
FR 06 08660 Oct 2006 FR national
Parent Case Info

This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. provisional application 60/867,312, filed Nov. 27, 2006.

Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60867312 Nov 2006 US