The natural intervertebral disc contains a jelly-like nucleus pulposus surrounded by a fibrous annulus fibrosus. Under an axial load, the nucleus pulposus compresses and radially transfers that load to the annulus fibrosus. The laminated nature of the annulus fibrosus provides it with a high tensile strength and so allows it to expand radially in response to this transferred load.
In a healthy intervertebral disc, cells within the nucleus pulposus produce an extracellular matrix (ECM) containing a high percentage of proteoglycans. These proteoglycans contained sulfated functional groups that retain water, thereby providing the nucleus pulposus within its cushioning qualities. These nucleus pulposus cells may also secrete small amounts of cytokines as well as matrix metalloproteinases (“MMPs”). These cytokines and MMPs help regulate the metabolism of the nucleus pulposus cells.
In some instances of disc degeneration disease (DDD), gradual degeneration of the intervetebral disc is caused by mechanical instabilities in other portions of the spine. In these instances, increased loads and pressures on the nucleus pulposus cause the cells to emit larger than normal amounts of the above-mentioned cytokines. In other instances of DDD, genetic factors, such as programmed cell death, or apoptosis can also cause the cells within the nucleus pulposus to emit toxic amounts of these cytokines and MMPs. In some instances, the pumping action of the disc may malfunction (due to, for example, a decrease in the proteoglycan concentration within the nucleus pulposus), thereby retarding the flow of nutrients into the disc as well as the flow of waste products out of the disc. This reduced capacity to eliminate waste may result in the accumulation of high levels of toxins.
As DDD progresses, the toxic levels of the cytokines present in the nucleus pulposus begin to degrade the extracellular matrix (in particular, the MMPs (under mediation by the cytokines) begin cleaving the water-retaining portions of the proteoglycans, thereby reducing its water-retaining capabilities). This degradation leads to a less flexible nucleus pulposus, and so changes the load pattern within the disc, thereby possibly causing delamination of the annulus fibrosus. These changes cause more mechanical instability, thereby causing the cells to emit even more cytokines, thereby upregulating MMPs. As this destructive cascade continues and DDD further progresses, the disc begins to bulge (“a herniated disc”), and then ultimately ruptures, causing the nucleus pulposus to contact the spinal cord and produce pain.
Intervertebral disc degeneration causes a number of clinical problems, including sequelae related to reduced disc height and herniation. In many cases, a simple discectomy can effectively relieve pain, but in time results in further collapse of the disc space because the intervertebral disc can no longer resist body loads the same as a healthy disc. Spine fusion procedures represent another state of the art treatment for disc problems. Fusion generally involves the use of interbody fusion cages and spinal fixation systems to immobilize the fusion site.
In an effort to substantially maintain the patient's range of motion and to reduce tissue damage associated with surgical intervention, the art has considered nucleus pulposus replacement and enhancement devices. Many of these devices are designed to fill at least a portion of the void left by removal of the nucleus pulposus portion of the disc and provide joint flexibility and shock absorption. Some of the nucleus pulposus devices being evaluated are in situ cured (such as in situ cured polyurethane contained within an outer bladder and in situ cured protein polymers). Other devices under evaluation include relatively solid hydrogels (such as hydrogel contained within a UHMWPE pillow and hydrogel balls).
Other intervertebral motion devices include devices having an articulation interface and cushion-type devices.
Both the fusion and motion intradiscal implants require an accurate determination of the cleared disc space for the best performance, mechanical fit and material interdigitation of the device in order to minimize potential device movement and expulsion. Each of the above-noted treatments involving an implant requires a removal of the natural nucleus pulposus from the disc space. This procedure is called a “discectomy”.
The ability of a surgeon to accurately determine the position, size and shape of the cleared disc space during discectomy is currently limited by many factors, including the procedure approach, access, location and the size through the annular wall, as well as available intraoperative imaging techniques. Improper location, size or shape of the cleared disc space following discectomy can greatly impact the size, placement and securement of intervertebral devices that are ultimately placed in the disc space, as well as the biomechanical loading of the device and the physiologic response to the device. For example, improper lateral placement of a nucleus pulposus replacement device may cause migration or expulsion of this implant, leading to continued height loss and irritation of neighboring tissues (including nerve roots), thereby creating additional pain or requiring re-operation.
When attempting to replace the nucleus of a damaged disc with a nucleus replacement implant, the surgeon typically desires to attain a number of related goals. First, the surgeon has a desire to adequately fill the disc space following the removal of disc tissue, while avoiding unnecessary damage to the surrounding annulus fibrosus. There is a further desire to intraoperatively visualize the space to be occupied by the nucleus replacement so that the implant may be effectively implanted. Next, there is a desire to avoid expulsation of the implanted device, which may occur either through the port through which the implant is inserted or through natural annular fissures. Lastly, there is a recognition that addition of radio-opaque agents to the implant may have a detrimental effect upon the performance properties of the implant.
It is known in the medical field to deliver a curable material to a surgical site within an expandable device or membrane, such as a balloon. In some embodiments thereof, a curable cement is delivered to a fractured vertebral body in order to strengthen the structure a regain its stability. In the area of nucleus pulposus replacement, it is known to deliver the curable material through a catheter.
For example, US Published Patent Application Number 2005/0027358 (“Suddaby”) discloses a nucleus replacement including a distendable sack or balloon which is inflated with a hardenable material and is detached in situ when the injected material has hardened. Suddaby further teaches that two nested balloons may be inserted, and then filled with materials which have different hardnesses when cured, to simulate a natural disc.
US Published Patent Application Number 2005/0245938 (“Kochan”) discloses repair of intervertebral discs with a catheter for inserting through a cannula, the catheter having a distal end and a proximal end and a lumen extending longitudinally therethrough. An expandable balloon may optionally be detachably attached to the catheter near the distal end. The proximal end of the catheter is coupled to an injector that holds a supply of a thermoplastic elastomer material at a predetermined elevated temperature sufficiently high to maintain the thermoplastic elastomer at a liquid state. The device allows a thermoplastic elastomer material to be injected into the intervertebral disc space or the articular joint space as a replacement prosthetic for the disc's nucleus pulposus.
US Published Patent Application Number 2005/0251259 discloses a system for replacing a natural vertebral disc with a synthetic disc, said system comprising an outer balloon adapted to be inserted into an intervertebral disc space, an inner balloon which can be inserted within said first balloon, thus defining a chamber between said first balloon and said second balloon, a first hardenable material in liquid form adapted to be injected into said inner balloon, a second hardenable material in liquid form adapted to be injected into said chamber, said first and second materials having different properties when hardened, and means for injecting said materials into said respective balloons while they are disposed within said intervertebral disc space, whereby a synthetic disc having inner and outer portions with different properties can be formed in said intervertebral space.
US Published Patent Application Number 2005/0209602 discloses an apparatus adapted to deliver a flowable biomaterial to an intervertebral disc space, comprising: a reservoir containing the flowable biomaterial fluidly coupled to the intervertebral disc space; at least one sensor adapted to monitor at least one injection condition of the flowable biomaterial; a controller programmed to; monitor the at least one sensor; control the flow of the flowable biomaterial into the intervertebral disc space in accordance with a first operating parameter; controlling the flow of the flowable biomaterial in accordance with a second operating parameter in response to one or more of the injection conditions reaching a threshold level; and maintaining the second operating parameter during at least a portion of the curing of the flowable biomaterial, incorporates sensors into its system.
US Published Patent Application Number 2003/0195628 discloses a method for repairing a damaged or diseased intervertebral disc, the method comprising the steps of: using minimally invasive techniques to remove damaged or diseased nucleus from the disc; providing a mold apparatus comprising a balloon adapted to contain a biomaterial and a delivery cannula adapted to flowably connect a biomaterial source to the balloon; positioning the balloon in the intervertebral disc space using minimally invasive techniques; providing a biomaterial source comprising a plurality of components adapted to be mixed at the time of use to provide a flowable biomaterial and initiate its cure; mixing the biomaterial components; delivering the flowable biomaterial into the balloon using minimally invasive techniques to provide a distraction pressure to the intervertebral disc space; allowing the delivered biomaterial to cure to permit the cannula to be removed and to provide a permanent replacement for the nucleus; and applying mechanical distraction in combination with the pressurized injection of flowable biomaterial to distract the intervertebral disc space.
US Published Patent Application Number 2005/0113923 teaches a method for implanting a spinal disc nucleus pulposus implant, comprising: removing nucleus pulposus tissue from a spinal disc; and injecting a biocompatible material into an intradiscal space; wherein the biocompatible material is injectable into the intradiscal space in a fluid state below physiological temperatures, and is curable by temperature alone via a reversible phase shift to form a gel at physiological temperatures.
US Published Patent Application Number 2005/0065609 discloses a flexible prosthetic cover shaped to form a replacement nucleus pulposus for an intervertebral disc and comprising an aperture for the introduction of filling material therein, and an elongate introducer member configured to pass into the aperture, the cover having a strengthened portion substantially opposite the aperture for engaging the distal end of the member, the strengthened portion and the said distal end being arranged to interlock, for facilitating orientation of the cover.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,888,220 (“Felt I”) discloses a nucleus pulposus replacement device comprising an expandable bag into which in-situ curable polyurethane is injected. Felt further discloses that the placement of the bag can be radiographically verified with the use of a C-arm. See also U.S. Pat. No. 6,248,131, US Published Patent Application Nos. US 2003/0220649 (“Felt II”) and US 2003/0195628. Felt II discloses some embodiments in which the balloon has metallic wires or other imageable means incorporated into it so that the balloon can be seen under fluoroscopy. Felt discloses that potential imageable materials include any metal, metal alloys, or ceramics that could be combined with a polymer, and that the imageable material can be in the form of wires, a mesh, or particles incorporated into the balloon or on its surface.
Felt does not disclose the use of a radiographic disc space trial balloon that is inflated to verify the size and geometry of the disc space.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a nucleus replacement that can be delivered through a small portal to the space formerly occupied by the nucleus pulposus. It is another object of the present invention to provide a means by which the surgeon can intraoperatively determine the space being occupied by the nucleus replacement.
The present invention relates to a nucleus pulposus replacement (NPR) delivered by a catheter and held within an expandable device or membrane, such as a balloon. This configuration helps to reduce the potential for expulsion, helps to distribute the stresses caused by delivery of the nucleus replacement, and can provide the surgeon with a means to determine the volume occupied by the nucleus replacement.
The balloon, which could be constructed from a resorbable material, is delivered to the disc space via a catheter. This delivery method helps to minimize the size of the defect made in the annulus fibrosus during the procedure. The catheter is inserted into the nuclear space following the removal of the native nucleus.
In a first embodiment, the balloon has two ports—an inlet port and an outlet port. These ports can be connected to a pressure-measuring device. After the catheter is placed in the intervertebral space, the balloon is filled with a radio-opaque solution until the desired balloon volume is attained. Following this, the nucleus replacement material is fed into the inlet port of the balloon, while the radiopaque agent is allowed to leave via the outlet port. A constant pressure is maintained to ensure that the volume does not change. Once the balloon is completely filled, it (along with its ports) is allowed to sit until the nucleus material is fully cured. Once curing of the curable nucleus replacement material is accomplished, the catheter, the inlet port and the outlet port are removed, and the remaining annular defect can be sealed.
In some preferred embodiments respecting sequential injection of fluids, the procedure is carried out with a single balloon having a single inlet port and a single outlet port. After the balloon is inserted into the disc space, the outlet port of the balloon is blocked. Next, the balloon is filled through the inlet port with a trial fluid, such as radiopaque saline, and the sufficiency of the expanded balloon is then assessed. If the assessment yields a satisfactory determination, then the surgeon simultaneously opens the outlet port and fills the balloon with NPR implant material. The radiopaque saline drains out the outlet port while as the NPR implant material takes its place inside the balloon, thereby producing a replacement implant.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of replacing a nucleus pulposus in an intervertebral disc, comprising the steps of:
In some embodiments having sequential injection of radiopaque and nucleus replacement materials, injection of the radiopaque materials produces a first pressure in the balloon, and the injection of the curable nucleus replacement material is carried out at substantially the same first pressure. In some embodiments thereof, the amount of the radiopaque fluid conducted into the balloon is measured prior to injecting the curable nucleus replacement material. In some embodiments, the surgeon carries out fluoroscopic assessment of the balloon after injecting the radiopaque material and before injecting the curable nucleus replacement material. Preferably, the inlet and outlet ports are removed from the balloon after curing is accomplished.
In addition, rather than filling the balloon with a radio-opaque solution and risking interactions between the trial sizing fluid and the nucleus replacement materials, the balloon could be manufactured with radio-opaque properties. For example, the elastomer component of the balloon could be impregnated with a radiopaque material such as barium sulfate or could be imprinted with tungsten ink. In these embodiments, the initial trialing fill of the radiopaque balloon could be a simple solution such as water or saline.
Another method of controlling the size of the inflated balloon includes the use of a volume control system. This embodiment can utilize syringes that are actuated to eject controlled, discrete amounts of curable nucleus replacement material.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of replacing a nucleus pulposus in an intervertebral disc, comprising the steps of:
Preferably, conduction of the fluids is accomplished by i) providing a fluid connection between a syringe containing the curable nucleus replacement material and the inlet port of the balloon, and ii) actuating the syringe to inject the fluid through the inlet port and into the balloon. In some embodiments thereof, the syringe is adapted to expel the fluid in discrete amounts. In some embodiments, the syringe has a threaded barrel, and its plunger is threaded and has an enlarged proximal end so that mechanical advantage may be employed. In some embodiments, the syringe contains a ratchet. In some embodiments, prior to conduction of the discrete amounts of curable nucleus replacement material, a fluid comprising a radiopaque material is conducted through the inlet port and into the balloon, and thereafter the balloon is fluoroscopically assessed.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a device for replacing a nucleus pulposus in an intervertebral disc, comprising:
Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a device for replacing a nucleus pulposus in an intervertebral disc, comprising;
In another embodiment of the present invention, two separate, adjacent balloons are employed. A first trial balloon is filled to occupy the disc space, and the appropriate volume is determined thereby. Following this measurement step, this first trial balloon is deflated as the second implant balloon is filled with nucleus replacement material. This second filling is conducted in a manner that will substantially maintain the volume obtained during the filling of the first balloon.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of replacing a nucleus pulposus in an intervertebral disc, comprising the steps of:
Preferably, conduction of the curable nucleus replacement material into the second implant balloon is carried out at substantially the same pressure produced in the first trial balloon by conduction of the fluid comprising the radiopaque material.
Preferably, the amount of the radiopaque fluid conducted into the first trial balloon is measured prior to conducting the fluid comprising the curable nucleus replacement material into the second trial balloon. Alternatively, the first trial balloon injected with the radiopaque material is fluoroscopically assessed.
After the fluid comprising the curable nucleus replacement material fills the second implant balloon, it is allowed to cure. Then, the inlet and outlet ports are removed from the balloons.
For the purposes of the present invention, a “discectomy” involves the removal of at least a portion of the nucleus pulposus of a degenerated disc. Often, the entire nucleus pulposus is removed. Frequently, a small amount of tissue from the annulus fibrosus portion of the intervertebral disc is removed as well, thereby leaving a central disc space surrounded by the remaining portion of the annulus fibrosus.
In performing a preferred method of the present invention, first, a discectomy is performed by creating a hole in the annulus fibrosus of the degenerating disc, inserting a tissue removal instrument (such as rongeurs) into the hole, and removing nucleus pulposus tissue from the central portion of the disc. The resulting structure is that shown in
In some embodiments, the device comprises a single balloon.
Now referring to
In some embodiments, the device comprises two balloons.
Now referring to
Now referring to
Next, the volume of the intradiscal cavity is obtained by monitoring either the volume of material injected into the balloon, or the pressure in comparison to known balloon expansion values. Intra-operative imaging is then performed to determine the coronal, saggital, and axial placement of the device, as well as the size, angle and geometry of the cleared disc space. The intra-operative imaging may include the use of a C-arm, cineradiography or image guided surgery.
Next, the surgeon makes an intraoperative determination as to whether an adequate intradiscal cavity has been created. If the surgeon determines that the intradiscal cavity is insufficient (for example, the disc space is located to the left of center), the surgeon deflates and removes the device, performs additional discectomy, and then again ascertains the disc space clearance with the trial balloon portion of the device.
Based upon the surgeon's assessment of the amount, size and shape of the disc space cleared, the surgeon can select the appropriate disc treatment procedure, including the injection or insertion of nuclear and annular augmentation materials, disc replacement devices or fusion devices.
Now referring to
Therefore, in preferred embodiments, there is provided a method for replacing a nucleus pulposus, comprising the steps of:
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, at least a portion of each of the nucleus pulposus and the annulus fibrosus is removed with a disc removal instrument to create a disc space DS. Suitable disc removal instruments include rongeurs, trephines, burrs and curettes. In some embodiments, the method includes removing at least a portion of the nucleus pulposus, wherein the removal step includes creating a vacuum or providing irrigation. In some embodiments, the irrigation is provided by the same cannulated instrument that delivers and expands the balloon. In some embodiments, the method includes removing at least a portion of the nucleus pulposus, wherein the removal step is achieved via chemical dissolution of the nucleus pulposus.
Next, the device comprising the trial balloon and implant balloon is inserted into the disc space in a deflated form. The device comprises:
In some embodiments, and as shown, the device is inserted into the disc space through a cannula. So as to avoid further damage to the annulus, preferably, the cannula is sized to be smaller than the annular opening created in the disc. In other embodiments, the device is inserted without the aid of a cannula.
The balloons can be delivered to the disc space by any suitable means, e.g., in deflated form retained within or upon the end of a rigid or semi-rigid rod or tube.
In some embodiments, the balloons may also be inserted through a hole created in an endplate of an adjacent vertebra above or below the target disc. The balloons may also be inserted into the disc space via a posterior, anterior or anterolateral approach.
Once positioned within the disc space, either centrally within the annular shell or at the edge of the annular rim, a suitable gas (e.g., nitrogen or carbon dioxide), liquid or other flowable expansion medium can be delivered through the tube in order to inflate the trial balloon in situ in a substantially radial, axial and/or longitudinal direction. In some embodiments, beads or other solid media are selected to be the expansion medium and are simply packed into the balloon through the tube.
Next, the trial balloon is expanded while in the disc space. Preferably, the trial balloon is expanded with radio-opaque media (not shown), such as a radio-opaque gas or liquid, or with radio-opaque beads. Once expanded, the trial balloon may be imaged intra-operatively in order to determine the size, shape and location of the disc space. The trial balloon is only partially expanded in the disc space. Preferably, the trial balloon is expanded to completely fill the disc space.
Next, the surgeon makes an intraoperative determination as to whether an adequate intradiscal cavity has been created. In some embodiments, this determination is made by either pressure assessment, fluoroscopic assessment or volumetric assessment. If the surgeon determines that the intradiscal cavity is insufficient (for example, the disc space is located to the left of center), the surgeon deflates and removes the device, performs additional discectomy, and then again ascertains the disc space clearance with the trial balloon portion of the device.
Based upon the surgeon's assessment of the amount, size and shape of the disc space cleared, the surgeon can select the appropriate disc treatment procedure, including the injection or insertion of nuclear and annular augmentation materials, disc replacement devices or fusion devices.
If, through the assessment, the surgeon has decided that sufficient disc space has been cleared, the surgeon then opens the exit port of the trial balloon and deflates the trial balloon (by, for example, providing suction through the exit port) while simultaneously filling the implant balloon with curable implant material. The simultaneously deflation of the trial balloon and inflation of the implant balloon is carried out under constant pressure or volume, so that when the trial balloon is deflated the implant balloon occupies substantially the same space as the trial balloon had occupied. Preferably, the simultaneous deflation/inflation of the balloons is carried out in a manner so as to maintain the disc height spacing created by the trial balloon. In some preferred embodiments, the implant balloon is filled through the injection of a plurality of discrete amounts of curable implant material. The injection of a plurality of discrete amounts of curable implant material allows the surgeon to accurately fill the balloon in a highly controlled manner. Once the implant balloon is completely filled, the cannulae connected with the balloons are removed. Optionally, the trial balloon may be removed as well. The material in the implant balloon is then allowed to cure.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a device for replacing a nucleus pulposus in an intervertebral disc, comprising;
d) a second catheter having a second inlet tube having a proximal end opening and a distal end opening and a second outlet tube,
Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a device for device for replacing a nucleus pulposus in an intervertebral disc, comprising;
It may sometimes occur that the surgeon expands the trial balloon and decides that additional height is needed. Therefore, in some embodiment, there is provided a device comprising multiple, vertically arranged balloons. When such a balloon is provided, the surgeon fills the base balloon, and then has the option of filling the superior balloon in order to create more height in the trial or implant balloon. The provision of multiple balloons in the same device avoids the need to replace the undersized balloon and associated catheter with larger ones when the need for additional fill has been determined. In some embodiments, the plurality of balloons may take the form of stacked baffles. In some embodiments, the different balloons within the same disc are provided with different pressures or different compressible materials in order to obtain different properties for different balloons within the same disc. For example, in one embodiments, some but not all of the balloons may be provided with particles that resist shear and dampen axial forces. In some embodiments, the balloons that are closer to the endplates are stiffer than those further away from the endplates. In some embodiments thereof, the stacking could be produced via multiple chambers of the same balloon.
In the lumbar region of the spine, the natural positioning of the vertebral endplates is such that the intervening disc has a wedged shape and provides a lordotic curvature to the spine. Therefore, it would be desirable for the implant balloon of the present invention to expand into a wedged shape that mimics the lordotic curvature of the spine. In other embodiments, the lordotic curvature is attained by implanting at least two balloons in a vertically arranged manner whereby the shape and spatial arrangement of the two balloons form a wedged shape and impart a lordotic curvature to the spine.
In some embodiments thereof, the lordosis could be produced via multiple chambers of the same balloon. Now referring to
In some embodiments, ultrasound is used to assess the shape of the expanded balloon. In these embodiments, the expandable device (such as a balloon) is expanded within the disc space and ultrasound is then used to assess its shape. In some embodiments, the surgeon carries out an ultrasound-based assessment of the balloon after injecting the radiopaque material and before injecting the curable nucleus replacement material. The ultrasound assessment may be carried out with or without the balloon in place. If there is an intact annulus, the balloon may be used to pressurize the voided space and ultrasound may then be used to assess that pressurized space.
Each expandable device or membrane of the present invention (such as a balloon) has at least one lumen, an inside surface, and an outer surface. Also, each balloon has an upper side, a lower side, an anterior side and a posterior side. The trial balloon is typically expanded by passing an expansion medium, such as a fluid or beads, through the lumen to fill the balloon. The implant balloon is typically expanded by filling it with a curable implant material.
Suitable materials for preparing balloons of the present invention may include those that are presently used for such purposes as balloon angioplasty. Suitable materials provide an optimal combination of such properties as compliance, biostability and biocompatability, and mechanical characteristics such as elasticity and strength. Balloons can be provided in any suitable form, including those having a plurality of layers and those having a plurality of compartments when expanded. A useful device will include the balloons, together with a delivery catheter (optionally having a plurality of lumens extending longitudinally therewith), and fluid or gas pressure means.
The balloons are typically made of an expandable material such as a plastic or elastomeric material. Examples thereof include silicone, polyurethane, polyethylene terephthalate, polycarbonate, thermoplastic elastomers and copolymers such as ether-ketone polymers such as poly(etheretherketone). Such polymeric materials can be used in either unsupported form, or in supported form, e.g., by the integration of fibers therein. In addition, the balloons may be made out of any of a wide variety of woven or nonwoven fibers, fabrics, metal mesh such as woven or braided wires, and carbon. Biocompatible fabrics or sheet material such as ePTFE and Dacron™ may also be used.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the balloons comprise a material selected from the group consisting of polyolefin copolymers, polyethylene, polycarbonate, polyethylene terephthalate, ether-ketone polymers, woven fibers, nonwoven fibers, fabrics and metal mesh.
A radio-opaque material may be mixed with the expandable material to provide a radio-opaque balloon having imaging capability. The radio-opaque material may be provided in the form of a filler, particles, wires or shapes. Suitable radio-opaque materials include barium, barium sulfate, calcium or metallic materials.
The balloons can include markers commonly used in image guided surgery to allow three dimensional reconstruction of the cleared disc space as compared to a preoperatively obtained reconstructed MRI and/or CT. The markers are preferably located upon the outside surface of the balloon. The markers may have spatially varying sizes, shapes or concentrations.
Because volume controlled systems are preferred embodiments of the present invention, in some embodiments, the expandable material of the balloon can be a non-compliant material that expands to a predetermined size. In some preferred embodiments, the distraction of the disc space is accomplished by such an inflatable, rigid (non-compliant) balloon. The non-compliant balloon can be delivered in deflated form to the interior of the annulus and thereafter inflated in order to distract the disc space and provide a spaced region for the delivery of the implant material. The balloon is preferably of sufficient strength and of suitable dimensions to distract the space to a desired extent and to maintain the space in distracted position for a sufficient period of time.
In one embodiment, at least the implant balloon has a wedged shape so that the height of the anterior portion of the expanded device is greater than the height of the posterior portion of the expanded device. This allows the surgeon to restore lordosis when the intervertebral implant is used in either the lumbar or cervical regions of the spine. Preferably, the wedged shape produces an angle of between 5 and 20 degrees, more preferably between 5 and 15 degrees.
In preferred embodiments, the height of the medial portion of at least the implant balloon is greater than the height of either lateral portion of the implant balloon. This geometry more closely mimics the natural doming of the disc space.
In some embodiments, the device can comprise at least one balloon of semicircular, circular, cylindrical, bilateral, or a generally crescent (or banana-like) shape. Upon inflation, each balloon can have a footprint that substantially corresponds to (but is smaller than) a rim of a vertebral endplate, wherein the anterior area height is greater than said posterior area height. More preferably, upon expansion, at least a portion of the balloon has a generally cylindrical shape thereby defining an axial dimension and a radial dimension.
In some preferred embodiments, the balloons may also be used to distract the cleared disc space. When inflated, a non-compliant balloon may provide rigid walls (e.g., when they are fiber-supported or bellows-supported) that are sufficiently strong to distract the space. An inflatable device providing sufficient strength and dimensions for distraction can be prepared using conventional materials. In one embodiment, the uninflated balloon can be delivered to the center of the annular shell, and thereafter inflated to expand the annular shell and in turn, distract the space. Preferably, the expansion medium is injected in an amount sufficient to distract the space.
As used herein, the word “distraction” will refer to the separation of the intervertebral joint surfaces to a desired extent, without rupture of their binding ligaments. Distraction can be accomplished by any suitable means including, for example, hydrostatic means. In one embodiment, the trial balloon is used as a distraction device. By the use of distraction, the disc space can be sufficiently re-established to achieve any desired final dimensions and position. Optionally, and preferably, the means used to accomplish distraction also serves the purpose of forming one or more barriers (e.g., balloons) for the flowable expansion media. If distraction is desired, then the disc space can be distracted prior to and/or during either a discectomy itself and/or delivery of a flowable expansion medium.
A constricted disc space is generally on the order of 3 to 4 mm in height. Suitable distraction means are capable of providing on the order of about 3 atmospheres to about 4 atmospheres, (or on the order of about 40 psi to about 60 psi) of force in order to distract that disc space to on the order of 8 to 12 mm in height. Preferably, when used for distraction, the balloon of the present invention is designed to withstand at least 1 MPa of pressure, more preferably at least 2 MPa, more preferably at least 3 MPa.
Distraction may occur via a multitude of steps or iterations, thereby allowing the soft tissue to relax, thus reducing the risk of soft tissue damage.
Preferably, the expansion media of the in situ formed device can be delivered percutaneously (e.g., through a cannula having a diameter of no more than 6 mm, preferably no more than 2 mm). However, the expansion media of the in-situ formed device can also be delivered in cannulae of much larger dimension (such as up to 18 mm, or through a Craig needle). More preferably, the expansion media of the in-situ formed device is delivered into the disc space in the form of an injectable fluid.
It has been reported in the literature that balloons inserted into the disc space may be subject to retropulsion. Therefore, in some embodiments of the present invention, and particularly those that include distraction, upon expansion, the inflatable implant balloon forms an upper surface having a first plurality of teeth projecting outwards from the upper surface. Upon expansion of the device, these teeth will project in the direction of the upper endplate and, upon complete expansion of the device, will engage the endplate to from a secure interlock with the endplate and resist retropulsion.
In some embodiments, the implant balloon can be coated with an adhesive such as a protein activated sealant, or a sealant that becomes adhesive when wetted or activated.
Preferably, the teeth are made of a stiff non-resorbable material, such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Preferably, the teeth have a height of between 0.5 mm and 1.5 mm, and have a triangular cross-section.
In some embodiments of the present invention, upon expansion, the inflatable implant balloon forms an upper surface formed of a material having a high coefficient of friction. Upon expansion of the device, the high coefficient of friction of the upper and lower surfaces will cause a drag upon any movement of the upper surface and therefore keep the device in place and resist retropulsion.
Preferably, the high friction upper and lower surfaces of the implant balloon device are made from a material selected from a group consisting of polyether block copolymer (PEBAX), ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene); ANS (acrylonitrile styrene); Delrin®; PVC (polyvinyl chloride); PEN (polyethylene napthalate); PBT (polybutylene terephthalate); polycarbonate; PEI (polyetherimide); PES (polyether sulfone); PET (polyethylene terephthalate); PETG (polyethylene terephthalate glycol), high and medium melt temperature: polyamides, aromatic polyamides, polyethers, polyesters, Hytrell®, polymethylmethacrylate, polyurethanes: copolymers, EVA (ethylene vinyl acetate) or ethylene vinyl alcohol; low, linear low, medium and high density polyethylenes, latex rubbers, FEP, TFE, PFA, polypropylenes, polyolefins; polysiloxanes, liquid crystal polymers, inomers, Surlins, silicone rubbers, SAN (styrene acrylonitrile), nylons: 6, 6/6, 6/66, 6/9, 6/10, 6/12, 11, all PEBAXs 12; polyether block amides; and thermoplastic elastomers.
Balloons of the present invention can be made using materials and manufacturing techniques used for balloon angioplasty devices. U.S. Pat. No. 5,807,327 (“Green”) discloses balloons that may be used in the present invention. The materials disclosed by Green for the formation of the balloon include tough non-compliant layer materials (col. 8, lines 18-36 of Green) and high coefficient of friction layer materials (col. 8, lines 42-54 of Green).
Generally, the balloon is deliverable through a cannula having an inside diameter of between 3 mm and 18 mm, preferably between 4 mm and 12 mm, more preferably between 5 mm and 10 mm.
In some preferred embodiments, a cannula having an inner diameter of no more than 6 mm, is inserted into the disc space.
In some embodiments in which the surgeon desires to minimize the size of the incision, the balloon is preferably deliverable through a cannula having an inside diameter of between 0.5 mm and 6 mm, preferably between 1 mm and 4 mm, more preferably between 2 mm and 3 mm.
In some embodiments, the present invention can be used to provide gradual correction of a scoliotic disc. The degree of curvature can be gradually changes over time by, for example, pumping up the balloons with a syringe.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. Aer. No. 14/623,946, filed Feb. 17, 2015. U.S. Appl. Ser. No. 14/623,946 is a continuation of U.S. Appl. Ser. No. 11/608,413, filed Dec. 8, 2006, and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,979,931. The entire contents of each of these applications is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4573448 | Kambin | Mar 1986 | A |
4646738 | Trott | Mar 1987 | A |
4678459 | Onik et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4863430 | Klyce et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4888146 | Dandeneau | Dec 1989 | A |
5080662 | Paul | Jan 1992 | A |
5195541 | Obenchain | Mar 1993 | A |
5285795 | Ryan et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5395317 | Kambin | Mar 1995 | A |
5439464 | Shapiro | Aug 1995 | A |
5496271 | Burton | Mar 1996 | A |
5529580 | Kusunoki et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5540706 | Aust et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5569290 | McAfee | Oct 1996 | A |
5591187 | Dekel | Jan 1997 | A |
5601569 | Pisharodi | Feb 1997 | A |
5662300 | Michelson | Sep 1997 | A |
5688222 | Hluchy et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5730754 | Obenchain | Mar 1998 | A |
5733242 | Rayburn et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735792 | Vanden Hoek et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752971 | Rosenbluth et al. | May 1998 | A |
5807327 | Green et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5820623 | Ng | Oct 1998 | A |
5885300 | Tokuhashi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888220 | Felt et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894369 | Akiba et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899425 | Corey, Jr. et al. | May 1999 | A |
5954635 | Foley et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6033105 | Barker et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6053907 | Zirps | Apr 2000 | A |
6063021 | Hossain et al. | May 2000 | A |
6110182 | Mowlai-Ashtiani | Aug 2000 | A |
6200322 | Branch et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217509 | Foley et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6234961 | Gray | May 2001 | B1 |
6248110 | Reiley | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248131 | Felt et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6283966 | Houfburg | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286179 | Byrne | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296644 | Saurat et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322498 | Gravenstein et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6354992 | Kato | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371968 | Kogasaka et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383191 | Zdeblick et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6436143 | Ross et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447446 | Smith et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468289 | Bonutti | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6558407 | Ivanko et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6575899 | Foley et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579281 | Palmer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6626830 | Califiore et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6648915 | Sazy | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6676597 | Guenst et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6688564 | Salvermoser et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6733533 | Lozier | May 2004 | B1 |
6758809 | Briscoe et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6808505 | Kadan | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6852095 | Ray | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6887198 | Phillips et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6958077 | Suddaby | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6983930 | La Mendola et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7087058 | Cragg | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7104986 | Hovda et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7137949 | Scirica et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7182731 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7291150 | Graf | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7341556 | Shalman | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7434325 | Foley et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7591790 | Pflueger | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7594888 | Raymond et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618431 | Roehm, III et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7636596 | Solar | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637905 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7641659 | Emstad et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7666205 | Weikel et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7771384 | Ravo | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7794456 | Sharps et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7811303 | Fallin et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7931579 | Bertolero et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7946981 | Cubb | May 2011 | B1 |
7951141 | Sharps et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7959564 | Ritland | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7988623 | Pagliuca et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8007492 | DiPoto et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8038606 | Otawara | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043381 | Hestad et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8062218 | Sebastian et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8092464 | McKay | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8096944 | Harrel | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8202216 | Melkent et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8221460 | Mathews | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8236006 | Hamada | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8333690 | Ikeda | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8360970 | Mangiardi | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8372131 | Hestad et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8382048 | Nesper et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8397335 | Gordin et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8435174 | Cropper et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8460180 | Zarate et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8460186 | Ortiz et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8460310 | Stern | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8518087 | Lopez et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8535220 | Mondschein | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8556809 | Vijayanagar | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8585726 | Yoon et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8602979 | Kitano | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8622894 | Banik et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636655 | Childs | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8690764 | Clark et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8721536 | Marino et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8734459 | Alobaid | May 2014 | B1 |
8740779 | Yoshida | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8784421 | Carrison et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8821378 | Morgenstern Lopez et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8834507 | Mire et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8845734 | Weiman | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8852242 | Morgenstern Lopez et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8870753 | Boulais et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8870756 | Maurice | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8876712 | Yee et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8894573 | Loftus et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8894653 | Solsberg et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8926502 | Levy et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8932207 | Greenburg et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8932360 | Womble et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8936605 | Greenberg | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8974381 | Lovell et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8979931 | Stad et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8986199 | Weisenburgh, II et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8992580 | Bar et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9028522 | Prado | May 2015 | B1 |
9050146 | Woolley et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9055936 | Mire et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9072431 | Adams et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9078562 | Poll et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9131948 | Fang et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9144374 | Maurice, Jr. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9198674 | Benson et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9211059 | Drach et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9216016 | Fiechter et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9216125 | Sklar | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9232935 | Brand et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9247997 | Stefanchik et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9265491 | Lins et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9277928 | Morgenstern Lopez | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9307972 | Lovell et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9320419 | Kirma et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
RE46007 | Banik et al. | May 2016 | E |
RE46062 | James et al. | Jul 2016 | E |
9386971 | Casey et al. | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9387313 | Culbert et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9414828 | Abidin et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9486296 | Mire et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9492194 | Morgenstern Lopez et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9510853 | Aljuri et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9526401 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9579012 | Vazales et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9603510 | Ammirati | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9603610 | Richter et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9610007 | Kienzle et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9610095 | To | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9629521 | Ratnakar | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9655605 | Serowski et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9655639 | Mark | May 2017 | B2 |
9668643 | Kennedy, II et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9675235 | Lieponis | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9700378 | Mowlai-Ashtiani | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9706905 | Levy | Jul 2017 | B2 |
10610369 | Stad et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
20010004710 | Felt et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020022762 | Beane et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020138020 | Pflueger | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030083555 | Hunt et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030171744 | Leung et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191474 | Cragg et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195628 | Bao et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220649 | Bao et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040122446 | Solar | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127992 | Serhan et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133280 | Trieu | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143165 | Alleyne | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040186471 | Trieu | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040230309 | DiMauro et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050027358 | Suddaby | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050065609 | Wardlaw | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085692 | Kiehn et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090848 | Adams | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050113923 | Acker et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050187570 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050209601 | Bowman | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209602 | Bowman et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050245938 | Kochan | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251259 | Suddaby | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256525 | Culbert et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060085069 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085074 | Raiszadeh | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060155379 | Heneveld et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060206118 | Kim et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060253198 | Myint et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253199 | Lehuec et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253200 | Bao et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271061 | Beyer et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293751 | Lotz et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070021835 | Edidin | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038300 | Bao et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055259 | Norton et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070129634 | Hickey et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149975 | Oliver et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070203396 | McCutcheon et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070225556 | Ortiz et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070260113 | Otawara | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080015621 | Emanuel | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033251 | Araghi | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080081951 | Frasier et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080140201 | Stad et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080188714 | McCaffrey | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090018566 | Escudero et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024158 | Viker | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090054990 | Myint et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062871 | Chin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090105543 | Miller et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090156898 | Ichimura | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090187080 | Seex | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090240111 | Kessler et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090287061 | Feigenbaum et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090318765 | Torii | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004651 | Biyani | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100022841 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100076476 | To et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100114147 | Biyani | May 2010 | A1 |
20100151161 | Da Rolo | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161060 | Schaller et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100256446 | Raju | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100280325 | Ibrahim et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100284580 | OuYang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100286477 | OuYang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312053 | Larsen | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110028791 | Marino et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054507 | Batten et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110106261 | Chin et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125158 | Diwan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130634 | Solitario, Jr. et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110184422 | Mathews | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110196499 | Boucher et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110295070 | Yasunaga | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319941 | Bar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120095296 | Trieu et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101338 | O'Prey et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120209273 | Zaretzka et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221007 | Batten et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120232350 | Seex | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120232552 | Morgenstern Lopez et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120298820 | Manolidis | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120316400 | Vijayanagar | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130103067 | Fabro et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130103103 | Mire et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130150670 | O'Prey et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150674 | Haig et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130172676 | Levy et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130282022 | Yousef | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289399 | Choi et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130303846 | Cybulski et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140066940 | Fang et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074170 | Mertens et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140142584 | Sweeney | May 2014 | A1 |
20140148647 | Okazaki | May 2014 | A1 |
20140180321 | Dias et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140194697 | Seex | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215736 | Gomez et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140257489 | Warren et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275799 | Schuele | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276840 | Richter et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277204 | Sandhu | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140318582 | Mowlai-Ashtiani | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140357945 | Duckworth | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150018623 | Friedrich et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150065795 | Titus | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150073218 | Ito | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150112398 | Morgenstern Lopez et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150157463 | Stad et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150164496 | Karpowicz et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150216593 | Biyani | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150223676 | Bayer et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150230697 | Phee et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150342621 | Jackson, III | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150374213 | Maurice, Jr. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160015467 | Vayser et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160030061 | Thommen et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160066965 | Chegini et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160067003 | Chegini et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160074029 | O'Connell et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160095505 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160106408 | Ponmudi et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160166135 | Fiset | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160174814 | Igov | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160213500 | Beger et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160228280 | Schuele et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160235284 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160287264 | Chegini et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160296220 | Mast et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160353978 | Miller et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170003493 | Zhao | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170007226 | Fehling | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170027606 | Cappelleri et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170042408 | Washburn et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170042411 | Kang et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170065269 | Thommen et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170065287 | Silva et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170086939 | Vayser et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170135699 | Wolf | May 2017 | A1 |
20170156755 | Poll et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170156814 | Thommen et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170196549 | Piskun et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170224391 | Biester et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102727309 | Nov 2014 | CN |
9415039 | Nov 1994 | DE |
29916026 | Nov 1999 | DE |
0 537 116 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0 807 415 | Nov 1997 | EP |
2481727 | Jan 2012 | GB |
9629014 | Jan 1996 | WO |
2001056490 | Aug 2001 | WO |
2001089371 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2002002016 | Jan 2002 | WO |
200217825 | Mar 2002 | WO |
2004103430 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005044154 | May 2005 | WO |
2008121162 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2009033207 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2013033426 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013059640 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2014050236 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2014100761 | Jun 2014 | WO |
2014185334 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2016111373 | Jul 2016 | WO |
2016131077 | Aug 2016 | WO |
2016168673 | Oct 2016 | WO |
2017006684 | Jan 2017 | WO |
2017015480 | Jan 2017 | WO |
2017083648 | May 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2007/086244, dated May 13, 2008 (8 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/043554, dated Nov. 19, 2015 (8 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/048485, dated Feb. 9, 2016. (16 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/060978, dated Feb. 15, 2016 (8 pages). |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for Application No. PCT/US2016/050022, mailed Nov. 3, 2016 (2 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2016/050022, dated Feb. 1, 2017 (19 pages). |
Iprenburg, M, “Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy: The Thessys Method,” in Lewandrowski, K., et al, Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Techniques, Summit Communications, 2008 pp. 65-81. |
Jung, K., et al., “A hands-free region-of-interest selection interface for solo surgery with a wide-angle endoscope: preclinical proof of concept,” Surg Endosc, 2017, v. 31, pp. 974-980. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190008648 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14623945 | Feb 2015 | US |
Child | 16124996 | US | |
Parent | 11608413 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 14623945 | US |