1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to increasing operational speed in an encryption domain.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
The document “RFC 1321-The MD5—Message-Digest Algorithm” by R. Rivest, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science and RSA Data Security, Inc., April 1992, pages 1-18, incorporated by reference herein, discloses an operational approach represented by the structure of
In accordance with that paper, four auxiliary functions are defined:
In addition, the 512 bits in the register 5 are broken down into 16 separate groups (k=0-15) of 32 bits each, and the function X(k) operates to select a group thereof determined by the value of k. The 512 bits in the register 6 are broken down into 16 separate groups (i=1-16) of 32 bits each, and the function T(i) operates to select a group thereof determined by with the value of i. The function CLS(s) rotator 11 operates to rotate the contents presented thereto by a number of bits determined by the value s (s=1-64).
With [ABCD k s i] denoting the operation for each of the following rounds:
Referring to
Initially, the 32-bit data set in the register A is applied to the adder 7. The first variable of the data set of register B, i.e., the bit B31, the first variable of the data set in register C, i.e., the bit C31, and the first variable of the data set in register D, i.e., the bit D31 (first set of variables B31, C31, D31) are applied as inputs to the logic block 8, which can apply either the function F, G, H or I to these variables. At the same time, the second variable of the data set of register B, i.e., the bit B30, the second variable of the data set of register C, i.e., the bit C30, and the second variable of the data set of register D, i.e., the bit D30 (second set of variables B31, C31, D31) are also applied as inputs to the logic block 8, etc., for each of the sets of variables. In this particular case, the function F is applied to these variables (
For the second operation of the first round, i.e., [DABC 1 12 2] the procedure is repeated, again applying the function F, and this procedure is repeated for all 16 operations of the first round, each of which applies the function F.
For the first operation of the second round, i.e., [ABCD 1 5 17], the above procedure is applied, however, with the logic block 8 applying the function G to the inputs provided thereto (
The third and fourth rounds are undertaken in like manner, using the function H (
As will be seen, the application of a function by the logic block 8 is dependent on inputs from registers B, C and D. While in each operation the contents of registers C and D are directly available to the logic block 8, after the first operation of the first round, the contents of register B to be applied to the logic block 8 are arrived at through a number of calculations involving adder 7, register 5, adder 9, adder 10, register 6, rotator 11, and adder 12. This time-consuming process causes the overall system to operate more slowly than is desired, since the logic block 8 must wait for inputs from all three registers B, C and D before applying the function thereof.
Therefore, what is needed is a method for speeding up the operation described above.
In the present method of implementing functioning of an encryption engine, first and second logic blocks are provided, each for running a function, the running of the function of the first logic block based on an input of a first variable which may have a first or second value and an input of a second variable which may have a first or a second value, the running of the function of the second logic block based on an input of the first variable which may have said first or said second value and an input of the third variable which may have a first or second value. An actual value of the second variable is provided. The function of the first logic block is run based on an input of the first variable set at the first value thereof, and an input of the second variable based on the actual value thereof, to provide a first output. The function of the first logic block is run based on an input of the first variable set at the second value thereof, and an input of the second variable based on the actual value thereof, to provide a second output. An actual value of the third variable is provided. The function of the second logic block is run based on an input of the first variable set at the first value thereof, and an input of the third variable based on the actual value thereof, to provide a third output. The function of the second logic block is run based on an input of the first variable set at the second value thereof, and an input of the third variable based on the actual value thereof, to provide a fourth output.
The present invention is better understood upon consideration of the detailed description below, in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. As will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description, there is shown and described an embodiment of this invention simply by way of the illustration of the best mode to carry out the invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of other embodiments and its several details are capable of modifications and various obvious aspects, all without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description will be regarded as illustrative in nature and not as restrictive.
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, as well as said preferred mode of use, and further objects and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Reference is now made in detail to a specific embodiment of the present invention which illustrates the best mode presently contemplated by the inventors for practicing the invention.
In operation, the function block LB1FB1 of logic block LB1 runs the function F with inputs C31, D31, B=0, while the function block LB1FB2 of logic block LB1 runs the function F with inputs C31, D31, B=1 (
The individual outputs of the logic blocks LB1-LB32 make up the individual bits of the 32-bit data which is applied to the adder 7 of
It will be seen that for each logic block, a function is run based on the actual value of the input from register C, the actual value of the input from register D, and both possible values of the input from register B, with the output of a logic block being determined based on the actual value of a particular bit of register B upon its application to a multiplexer. Thus, calculations covering all eventualities for values of B31-B0 to arrive at register B have already been undertaken without waiting for the actual values of those bits to reside in register B. Once the actual bits have arrived in the register B, the value of each bit is provided by a direct path to a multiplexer. This is to be compared with the prior art system wherein the running of a function was undertaken only after the three actual values of inputs from register B, C and D were provided to the logic block 8. In the present situation, the running of a function is undertaken in parallel with the steps described above for providing data to register B, and only the simple step of selecting the output based on the actual value of a bit in register B, using a direct path from the register B to a multiplexer, need to be undertaken.
The foregoing description of the embodiment of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Other modifications or variations are possible in light of the above teachings.
The embodiment was chosen and described to provide the best illustration of the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable one of ordinary skill of the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. All such modifications and variations are within the scope of the invention as determined by the appended claims when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly, legally and equitably entitled.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3634658 | Brown | Jan 1972 | A |
3902056 | Aizenberg et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
4074336 | Clarke | Feb 1978 | A |
4584640 | MacGregor et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
5008935 | Roberts | Apr 1991 | A |
5946369 | Kolagotla et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5999953 | Monier | Dec 1999 | A |
6199162 | Luyster | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6317769 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6536016 | Andreev et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6580296 | Beiu | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6820105 | Blaker | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6943579 | Hazanchuk et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6961846 | Fleck et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7197527 | Naslund et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
Entry |
---|
RFC 1321—The MD5—Message-DigestAlgorithm by R. Rivest, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science and RSA Data Security, Inc., Apr. 1992, pp. 1-18. |
Network Working Group, R. Rivest, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science and RSA Data Security, Inc., Apr. 1992, pp. 1-21. |
Computer Arithmetic, Behrooz Parhami, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 114-120. |
Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 20050018329.X, dated May 22, 2009. |
Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 20050018329.X, dated Apr. 13, 2010. |
Office Action for German Patent Application No. 11 2005 000 776.6-31 dated Dec. 2, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050226409 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |