This invention is directed to a method for shaping a metal component by cyclically striking the component with multiple reciprocating contact dies as the component is moved along a longitudinal axis relative to the dies.
The drawing of shaped specimens involves a die with a specifically shaped inlet and a pulling mechanism to advance, or “draw”, the shaped component through the die in order to force a cross sectional reduction of the shape. Significant levels of surface sliding occur under the compressive loading condition which occurs while in contact with the reducing die. The presence of frictional forces at this interface has two dominating negative implications. The first implication of friction is that it increases tension required for a given reduction and lowers the maximum reduction possible before tensile tearing or necking of the reduced portion of the specimen occurs. The second negative implication is that friction increases the occurrence of sliding defects on the surfaces, such as galling, tearing, or striations. As a result, the success of traditional drawing in delivering adequate “per pass” reductions and acceptable surface quality is tied to maintaining a low coefficient of friction between the die and the specimen.
Maintaining a low coefficient of friction is not always easy or possible, particularly when reducing pieces at elevated temperatures. The most common lubricants in drawing are oil or grease based, which have low thermal stability. Solid film type lubricants such as graphite also thermally degrade below the common hot working temperatures of many metals. As a result, effective lubricants are insufficient to enable effective drawing for many alloys that require deformation to occur at higher temperatures.
In U.S. Pat. No. 2,393,131 a lower observed friction coefficient in drawing is achieved by applying vibration to an otherwise static die geometry. In this, the orifice geometry is constant and fixed, and the entire die exhibits a small vibration. Contrastingly, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,585,832 regarding drawing, a cyclic tensile load was applied by the pulling mechanism to pull a specimen through a static die in order to lower the average tensile force required in drawing. Though both prior arts focus on lowering effective contact friction, the underlying sliding mechanics in the die remain in governance of the draw forces of the drawing process. As a result, difficulties in drawing materials at high temperatures with standard drawing will largely remain congruent, perhaps with marginal improvements from lower friction coefficients.
In U.S. Pat. No. 3,575,029 a roller-based reduction method resulting in higher reduction per pass of the specimen in comparison to simply rotating rollers is achieved by coupling rollers to series of linkages that results in a walking motion when driven by eccentric drives. This concentrates the contact pressures into a small area relative to the specimen transition zone as compared to a simply rotating roller. As a result, the total compressive forces within a given instant are lower and potential specimen per-pass reduction is higher. The shortcoming of the use of this device lies in the complexity and technical difficulty in building long lived rotating and sliding joints exposed to high temperatures for long periods. Operating rotating rollers at or near the temperature desired for difficult to work materials would require complex cooling or expensive connections to achieve operational reliability.
In U.S. Pat. No. 3,727,443 a series of ring—shaped arrays of spherical roller bearings were substituted for a static die to draw and reduce the cross-sectional area of tubes. The rings of spheres were rotated at given speeds while the part advanced through the contact area, while a static mandrel maintained the inner diameter sizing, thus imparting helical reduction of the exterior surface of the tube. Through control of speed and placement of the path of the helical contacts, with two sets of rollers of differing in number, complete reduction of the tube was achievable. While this was effective at lowering friction and in achieving an improved surface finish, the invention is only applicable to the deformation of tube structures. Additionally, the reduction was applied to portions of the cross section at a given time creating differential deformation through the reduction zone. Differential reduction can result in loss of straightness, residual stress, or even strain related microstructure defects in some materials such as shear banding.
Departing from inventions relating to drawbench design, the occurrence of reciprocating dies or hammers to reduce and reshape metal can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 391,825, 455,905, 1,180,296, and 2,114,302. All embodiments involved a radial arrangement of reciprocating dies to reduce or re-shape bar and simple shaped specimens. In U.S. Pat. No. 391,825 four radially arranged dies reshaped the end of a round bar. In U.S. Pat. No. 455,905 six alternating radially arranged dies with contact overlap were employed for reducing round material. In U.S. Pat. No. 1,180,296 several sets of radially arranged dies were placed in sequence to impart multiple reductions per pass of a bar or ingot. In U.S. Pat. No. 2,114,302 a radial arrangement of reciprocating dies was used specifically to reshape square metal bar into round metal bar. In all reciprocating die prior arts, the dies are all radially arranged with a common center to only work round, tubular, or other simple geometric shapes (i.e. squares, hexagons, octagons, etc.). This would not enable the imparting of reduction to specimens having complex cross sections of varying geometries. Thus, the prior arts fail to deliver a method to manufacture complex geometry specimen. Also, none of these arts present the coupling of a maintained tensile force on the outgoing material specimen for straightening and residual stress reduction. Failure to tension and/or stretch outgoing material forfeits the ability to straighten or stress relieve through tensile yielding, which results in subsequent and costly straightening processes.
In U.S. Pat. Nos. 535,446, 773,197 2,178,141, 2,999,405, 3,645,126, 3,728,890, and 4,229,963 reciprocating dies were also used in metalworking, however the focus of these arts lies on the arrangement and means of actuation.
In U.S. Pat. No. 535,446 a flexible connection was used to mount the dies to the powering device to allow transfer of die inertia through less constrained impact motions. The downside of this is that limited control exists on the stopping point of the dies. As such, specimen thickness control is diminished.
In U.S. Pat. No. 773,197 a force was imparted on floating dies by a lobed shaft on the back face of the die. This die actuation mechanism allows a high rate of die impulses with lower shaft rotating speed through the back striking of the contact dies. Management of specimen advance would be less consistent because die pieces have minimal position constraint when not under the influence of contacting lobe. This would result in varying reduction bites and potential for distortion in the specimen.
In U.S. Pat. No. 2,178,141 a series of radially arranged reciprocating dies with very long contact down the length of a metal tube straightens the material within the bite, or die clamping, while imparting a minimal level of cold forming reduction on the cross section. The extended length of reduction bite aims to straighten by yielding the pipe while constrained in the straight condition. This straightening technique with an exaggerated contact zone would provide extended contact time with the die material. Reducing the specimen cross section at elevated temperatures would lead to significant heating losses at the contact surfaces and non-uniform strain accommodation.
In U.S. Pat. No. 2,999,405 radially arranged dies were mounted to inwardly sloping supports that imparted compression when the dies slid down the support toward the shared intersection or convergence of all travel axes (plural). A shared actuator allows a high degree of control and consistency of the die reciprocation advancement for shared center architectures. However, this architecture does not allow flexibility to reduce intricate shapes, especially those requiring die reciprocation without a shared convergence point.
In U.S. Pat. No. 3,645,126 radially arranged dies were powered with a series of closed oscillating hydraulic circuits for each die. In the operation of the art at higher frequencies to boost productivity and minimize contact time, water hammering effect and friction heating of the fluid would degrade system performance. Additionally, the compressibility of the working fluid would limit the ability to have highly controlled die stop positions to deliver consistent thicknesses.
In U.S. Pat. No. 3,728,890 six radially arranged dies are physically coupled with flexible shafts for improved control and synchronization compared to prior pneumatic versions of 6 die bar reducers. The physical coupling of reciprocating dies is effective provided a fixed arrangement of reciprocating mechanisms are present, as is the case with this art's radial arrangement of dies. This fixed radial arrangement limits the specimen geometry to rounds with limited adaptability to other geometries.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,229,963 inward compressions of dies were accomplished through a rotating support frame connected to the dies through connecting rods. This coupled advance design provides a coordinated advancement of the die tools in a radial arrangement. However, this architecture prevents forging of complex geometry specimen due to non-adaptive die motions.
An additional category of loosely related reducing machines exists which are categorized as walking die reducing machines. Unlike drawing based inventions where parts are drawn through a reducing die, in this category, various mechanisms are employed to generate a walking motion of a die along the length of a metal segment. This motion combines the compression and advancing action into a single motion. Patents for such mechanisms include: U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,549,527, 2,153,839, 3,114,276, 3,374,654, and 3,626,746. In U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,549,527, 2,153,839, 3,114,276, and 3,374,654 varying combinations of eccentrics and linkages are presented to generate compressive and axial translation motions of the contact dies onto the workpiece, heretofore called “walking motion”. In U.S. Pat. No. 3,626,746 one or more sliding wedge structures is coupled with eccentrics and levers to generate similar walking motions as other inventions with different mechanism architecture. In these walking motion prior arts, the combination of the compressive reduction action with axial advance results in the advance without any advancing device. As a result, the ability to apply a tensile force to reduced portion of the workpiece in order to stretch straighten finished product is not provided. As such, any distortion imparted during reduction of the specimen will require additional post processing to remove.
The present invention involves a device for physically reducing the cross section of a shaped component into a finished or near finished condition. The current invention utilizes a series of die segments that exhibit a synchronized reciprocation that imparts cross sectional reduction on a specimen. The segment shape and arrangement create the orifice between the segments to match the specimen being reduced. The arrangement and direction of reciprocation allows tailored opening and closing of specific gaps or spacing to uniformly reduce various specimen features in the reduction pass. The maintaining of tension on the material of the specimen that is exiting the die segments allows optimized tensile loading on the exiting material to yield the highest straightness possible.
When reciprocation is less than the total reduction, the piece is never fully out of the constraint of the die and the amount of specimen advancement is limited before re-engagement is established within the die. The case where reciprocation is more than the total reduction contact is temporarily lost with each reciprocation and highlights the next variant of embodiment.
When reciprocation is chosen to be larger than the total reduction or in cases where higher levels of tension are sought, as in the case with bulky sections, two opposing tensioning devices are used on the end of the specimen entering and exiting the dies. The back tension is insufficient to prevent the mechanism on the exiting material from advancing the specimen through the dies. In the variant where reciprocation is larger than the total reduction, this provides the means for maintaining constant tension on the specimen when die contact is lost during fully retracted states.
The decoupling of the magnitude of the tensile force from the amount of reduction allows for much higher reductions to be imparted per reduction pass, and a specified tensile force to be applied to optimize straightness and residual stress results in the reduced piece. This results in improved straightness and the ability to reduce the number of reduction passes required to yield the final, desired, specimen condition.
The present invention mechanism offers relatively high frequency and relatively small reciprocation travel to deliver very refined and concise final dimensions and surfaces. The high frequency offers high travel velocity of the specimen through the die, low contact times with dies, and more contacts with a given point on the specimen. The high precision of reciprocation travel of the eccentric mechanism and the electromagnetic actuator allow high levels of control of the thickness uniformity of the reduced specimen. The current invention delivers consistent advancement and therefore reduction under the influence of tension. Precision is achieved with each die segment and coordinated with electronic control mechanisms. The current invention allows independent positioning or retracting of the die segments. This offers the ability to adapt to varying shaped specimens as well as an open die array to allow easier loading and unloading of specimen to start reduction.
For a detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings in which:
The description of the device is intended for illustrative purposes and not to limit the scope of the invention in any way. Referring first to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The present invention is an improvement of the drawing process or a drawbench device with the use of an array of synchronized reciprocating dies to input compressive work into the cross section of a shaped component that is maintained in position under a desired tension.
The oscillating motion reducing the metal sections provides alleviation for the tendency of the traditional drawing process to result in surface defects resulting from the workpiece being slid through static tapered dies. In the described innovation, deformation occurs as the synchronized oscillating dies close in on one another while the specimen experiences diminished axial advancement due to the tension being insufficient to advance the component through the die under compression. As the dies are allowed to retract on the other portion of the reciprocation cycle, the component is allowed to advance through the bite of the die under lower or absent contact pressure. This diminished sliding during high contract pressure and advancement during lower or zero contact pressure minimizes surface sliding defects during drawing, particularly for galling sensitive materials and during drawing at high temperatures. This invention reduces the requirement of highly effective friction reducing lubricants and allows processing of difficult to lubricate materials and utilization of processing temperatures above the availability of effective drawing lubricants, enabling new product offerings.
The reduction of simple bar such as rounds, squares, rectangles, and tubes can be accomplished enveloping the periphery of the shape exterior with reciprocating dies as shown in
The ability to reduce complex shaped components arises from the arrangement of reciprocating dies to form a series of spaces between the dies. The shape of these spaces can be influenced by profiling the working surfaces of the dies and by changing their orientation relative to one another. The resulting spaces will correspond with the desired shaped component after gage reduction. The extremities of these spaces may be open or partially closed to allow widening of component features or to discourage this widening effect.
The motion or direction of synchronized reciprocation should be such that the spaces between the die segments open and close in unison. In the preferred embodiment, the reduction imparted to material in each individual space between the die segments would receive equal strain from the draw pass to provide the least distortion or residual stress in the drawn component. This is not requisite to the invention as the applied axial tensile load provides a means of straightening and stress relaxation through tensile stretching. The amount of reciprocation may be smaller than the total reduction of the workpiece in the given pass, such that multiple reduction and advancement cycles are necessary for a segment to fully reduce and pass through the bite of the dies. In this embodiment, only certain advancement of the workpiece will occur in a given reciprocation cycle until the die opening motion stops and axial advancement stops. This provides advancement speed regulation tied to reciprocation frequency, reciprocation stroke length, and die lead in geometry. Other embodiments of this invention involve die strokes larger than the total reduction of the workpiece in the given pass. In these embodiments another device is present on the entry side of the reciprocating dies to provide a back tension against the pulling mechanism and to regulate the rate of axial advancement when the dies completely disengage the workpiece.
Higher frequency reciprocation is generally preferred for productivity and die exposure reasons. However, frequency reciprocation must remain low enough to allow axial advancement of the workpiece during the retraction phase of the reciprocation cycle. The invention may utilize any suitable mechanism to power the reciprocation and provide compressive forces to the die. Many different methods for mounting and supporting the various die segments can be utilized. As such, some level of rotational motion and axial translation of the die segment during a reciprocation cycle is considered permissible within the confines of the invention but is not necessary for successful operation of the invention.
In order to provide clearer illustration of the impact, novelty, and advantages of the invention, the specifics of an application are provided. This example is not to constrict the scope of the invention and is to be considered in no way limiting.
Though many different materials are not conducive to working in the low temperature requirements seen in standard draw bench reduction, in this specific example precipitation hardening 17-4 PH illustrates this well. Imparting deformation too cold, or even too hot, results in the presence of delta ferrite within the material and results in loss of transverse ductility. This results in impractically brittle and anisotropic final material. In addition to ductility loss, delivery of desirable grain size is influenced by the amount of deformation and the temperature at the time of deformation, particularly in semi-austenitic grades. To prevent this, a specific window of thermal processing must be maintained, with a targeted temperature of 2150° F. for the case of 17-4 PH stainless steel. The material, when properly hot worked, is desirable for many uses due to considerably higher strengths than austenitic stainless steels or carbon steels which can be delivered in complex shaped structural members, available with prior art.
The aim geometry in this specific example is a Tee-shaped cross section, as illustrated in
The dies surrounding this Tee shape will open and close, in synchronous, to impart the reduction into the specimen as it passes through the dies. The two dies adjacent the vertical segment of the Tee-section have both vertical and horizontal motion components as they move upward and off of the horizontal segment and outward and off of the vertical segment. The lower die only has a vertical motion component. The horizontal component of travel of the upper dies is 0.010″ in and out for each side (providing a 0.020″ total gap reciprocation). The vertical component of travel of the upper dies and the only component of travel of the lower die are both 0.021″ per side (providing a 0.042″ total gap reciprocation). Combining the X and Y component for the upper dies results in a reciprocation of 0.023″ of travel in a direction of 63° angle from horizontal. With each opening motion of reciprocation of the dies, the tensioning specimen advances the Tee segment 0.083″ forward prior to re-engagement of the contact faces. As a result, the specimen is reduced by several die reciprocations as it passes between the dies and is fully reduced to the target thickness. A portion of the reduction manifests as a widening of the cross-sectional features on the Tee segment and should be offset by inputting a slightly narrower input stock. However, the majority of the thickness reduction manifests in the form of elongation. In this example, the typical exit velocity ratio of 2.6 to 1. This however can vary with parameters such as contact friction, entry geometry, and die temperatures. With a reciprocation frequency of 1800 reciprocations per minute (30 Hz) coupled with an entry advance of 0.083″ the resulting entry speed of 12.5 ft/minute is generated. Due to the elongation from reduction, an exit velocity of 31.25 ft./minute is generated. The resulting processing speed would yield 20 ft of usable finished length in 38 seconds. Reciprocating frequencies of about 8-3600 rpms and entry speeds of about lft/min to 150 ft/min may be utilized accordingly to the invention.
During this reduction the exit material is maintained under tension by pulling against the reducing die segments. Though die reciprocation results in brief release of the segment, tension is reestablished with contact with die following incremental advancement. The magnitude of tensile force is such as to provide nearly instantaneous advancement of the segment each time the dies open as well as to impart a slight yielding in the axial direction. Given that reduction amounts are so much higher than those in tradition draw bench design, there is no concern that applied tension would advance the segment in the bite of the dies in an unintended way through sliding. This disconnect of tension from the reduction amount allows the magnitude to be adjusted to be high enough to straighten the segments but low enough not to neck the component and compromise dimensional integrity of the section. This ability to adjust tension independently of the reduction amount is unique to the process and historically has been merely a product of the reduction amount in traditional draw bench applications. This ability to deliver robust straightness in the same operation eliminates the cost of either additional draw operations for the purpose of straightening or separate straightening operations with separate equipment, thus further improving the cost structure of drawn components.
This invention's introduction of synchronized reciprocation of die segments to reduce a workpiece on a draw bench allows for performance improvement compared to prior art. In all prior art in draw bench applications the tension force on exiting material was set by the force required to pull the workpiece through a die and impart the reduction of that pass. Limits on reduction strain magnitude arose when the desired reduction strain would require an axial tensile force in excess of what the exiting cross section could support without excessive stretching, deformation, or tearing. In the present invention, the axial tensile load is no longer dictated by the reduction amount, since reduction is largely accomplished by the reciprocating die segments. Reductions much higher than prior art can be achieved with lower axial tensile forces. Simultaneously with much higher reduction strains, the axial tensile force can be adjusted to yield optimum straightness and residual stress levels without significant influence to drawing productivity, provided axial tensile forces are sufficient to adequately advance the workpiece during the retraction phase of the reciprocation cycle and not in excess of axial forces required to slide the piece forward in the bite during the compressive phase of the reciprocation cycle.
A provision for tensioning outgoing material in a traditional draw bench is commonly delivered using a clamping device on a traveling carriage. In this invention the presence of a tensile load of a desired magnitude is the only requirement and is independent of which suitable mechanism is chosen to deliver this tensile load. All suitable mechanisms for delivering tensile load on material exiting after the reduction process are considered embodiments of this core invention.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations may be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Certain terms are used throughout the description and claims to refer to particular features or components. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, different persons may refer to the same feature or component by different names. This document does not intend to distinguish between components or features that differ in name but not structure or function. For example, as used herein “reciprocating die,” “die segment,” “reciprocating contact die,” “reciprocating die module,” “die module,” and similar terms are interchangeable and refer to the die segments cited in the claims. Likewise, “specimen,” “metal segment,” “work piece,” and similar terms are interchangeable and refer to the specimen cited in the claims.
The present application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/687,168, filed Nov. 18, 2019, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16687168 | Nov 2019 | US |
Child | 18238572 | US |