The field of the invention is that of radio communications, and more precisely of digital radio communication terminals, whether entailing radio telephones or devices or means of all types able to exchange signals using a radio communication system, implanted for example in machines or vehicles.
The invention relates more particularly to the initialising of an electronic radio communication module.
Currently, much research is being devoted to the manufacture of radio communication devices. Indeed, the aim concerns at least three objectives that are difficult to reconcile: miniaturising the devices, increasing and adapting the functionalities, and simplifying assembly.
In order to guarantee optimal integration the holder of this application has proposed an approach consisting in grouping together in a single module (called an electronic radio communication module), all or at least most of the functions of a digital radio communication device.
Such a module is presented in the form of a single housing, preferentially shielded, that the device manufacturers can implant directly, without having to take a multitude of components into account.
This module (still sometimes referred to as “macro component”) is indeed formed of a grouping of several components on a substrate, in such a way as to be embedded in the form of a single element. It includes the components (in particular a processor and memories (a volatile memory and a non-volatile memory) and the essential software needed for the operation of a radio communication device (also referred to as radio communication terminal or wireless terminal) using radio frequencies.
Such a module thus makes it possible to integrate all of the components into wireless terminals (portable telephones, modems, or any other device making use of a wireless standard) easily, rapidly and in an optimised manner.
As such, the modules distributed by the holder of this application are fully tested from a hardware as well as a software standpoint on most of the networks on which they can then be used. Furthermore, the module advantageously encompasses the aspects of intellectual property (or IPRs, for “Intellectual Property Rights”) (all of the functions have been grouped together, it is the manufacturer of the module who handles aspects concerning the corresponding industrial property rights) and technical assistance.
Generally, electronic radio communication modules are initialised with calibration parameters, before use.
This is in particular due to the fact that they carry a hardware portion that calls upon analogue electronics. Indeed, the high dispersion of the electrical parameters of this hardware portion require software compensations via the use of parameters of which the value is set at the end of a calibration process, during production (in factory) of the radio communication module.
However, this known calibration technique has the disadvantage of requiring a high-capacity non-volatile memory (for example of the “flash” type), and therefore costly and cumbersome, to store the aforementioned compensating parameters. Indeed, the memory space used by the calibration parameters of the hardware portion of the radio communication module is not negligible (approximately 8 Kbits are needed in prior art).
The constraints of integrating these radio communication modules increase on a regular basis. There is therefore a need to optimise the storage of the calibration parameters of the hardware portion of the radio communication module, in particular for the implementation of a radio communication module that does not have a high-capacity non-volatile memory.
The invention, in at least one embodiment, has in particular for objective to overcome these various disadvantages of prior art.
More precisely, one of the objectives of this invention, in at least one embodiment, is to provide a technique making it possible to initialise a radio communication without having to use costly calibration parameters, in particular in terms of memory.
Another objective of this invention, in at least one embodiment, is to provide a calibration parameter compression technique that is simple to implement and that is effective, especially in terms of reducing the size of the storage space to be used.
The invention also has for objective to propose such a compression technique that, in at least one embodiment, is in particular well suited to the use of a non-volatile memory of reduced size (of a magnitude of a few hundred bits), for example of the fusible type (originally intended to receive a serial number).
Another objective of the invention is to provide a decompressing technique that is simple to implement and that is effective, especially in terms of rapidity in restoring calibration parameters.
An additional objective of the invention, in at least one embodiment, is to provide a technique making it possible for the supplier of the radio communication module to continue to ensure its customer that the module is certified, calibrated and that the intellectual property rights (IPRs) are included.
These objectives, as well as others that shall appear in what follows, are reached using a method of initialising an electronic radio communication module capable of executing at least one radio communication programme, stored in a first non-volatile memory, said initialisation being based on calibration parameter values.
According to the invention, the method comprises the following steps, carried out by said module when it executes said at least one programme:
As such, the invention is based on an entirely new and inventive approach for the initialisation of a radio communication module. Indeed, this initialisation of the module is carried out using the decompressing of compressed calibration parameters and stored in a non-volatile memory of reduced size. The radio communication module is thus released from the use of a cumbersome and costly non-volatile memory. The second non-volatile memory is for example a memory of the fusible type, originally intended to receive serial numbers.
Note that this invention covers the case wherein the first and second non-volatile memories are built into the radio communication module, as well as the case wherein one of the two non-volatile memories or none is present in the module.
In a particular embodiment, the first non-volatile memory (external or internal to the module) furthermore stores a decompressing programme, making it possible when it is executed by the module (by the hardware means of execution) to obtain decompressed calibration parameters using the compressed calibration parameters.
Advantageously, the module executes a step of storing said decompressed calibration parameters in a third volatile memory.
The decompressed calibration parameters are for example stored in a third external volatile memory, for example, a PSRAM memory.
Preferentially, the module executes said step of reading, by reading said compressed calibration parameters in a non-volatile memory internal to said module and forming said second memory.
Advantageously, the calibration parameters include at least one parameter relating to a power amplifier included in said module, and belonging to the group comprising:
The invention also relates to a method of compressing at least one calibration parameter of an electronic radio communication module capable of executing at least one radio communication programme stored in a first non-volatile memory, said module being initialised with a value of each calibration parameter, said value of each calibration parameter being included in an initial range of possible values, said initial range being centred on an average value and function of the dispersion of said module.
According to the invention, the method comprises the following steps, for at least one calibration parameter:
Note that the method of compressing according to the invention is based on a discretisation of ranges of potential values (or typical values observed in production) for each calibration parameter. As such, it is possible to accurately define the number of bits needed to store each parameter to be calibrated as a digital (parameter relating to logical functions), analogue (parameter relating to functions of the audio type) and radio frequency (parameter relating to the transmission and reception of a radio signal) functions.
For a given parameter, the limits of the range of useful values are chosen in such a way as to include all of the values of the given parameter that it is actually possible to encounter in production.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the method comprises a prior step of selecting at least one calibration parameter, according to at least one dispersion criterion.
According to an advantageous aspect of the invention, said step of compression implements a compression such that, for a given calibration parameter, the compressed value of said given parameter is defined by:
Compressed value=E((Initial value−Offset)/Granularity)
where
“Compressed value” designates the compressed value of said given parameter;
“Initial value” designates the discrete value of said given parameter;
“Offset” corresponds to an offset value defined according to the typical value and the range of dispersion known in production;
“Granularity” corresponds to the size of the smallest interval between two values obtained after decompression; and
“E” designates the notation of the integer function.
The granularity value, also called “step”, is chosen according to the precision needed on the initial value. For this, the influence of the imprecision of the initial value on the overall performance of the electronic radio communication module must be analysed beforehand.
The invention also relates to a method of decompressing at least one calibration parameter of an electronic radio communication module capable of executing at least one radio communication programme stored in a first non-volatile memory, said module being initialised with a value of each calibration parameter, said value of each calibration parameter being comprised in an initial range of possible values, said initial range being centred on an average value and function of the dispersion of said module.
According to the invention, the method comprises the following steps, for at least one compressed calibration parameter:
According to an advantageous aspect of the invention, said step of decompression implements a decompression such that, for a given calibration parameter, the decompressed value of said given parameter is defined by:
Decompressed value=Offset+(Granularity*compressed value)
where
“Decompressed value” designates the decompressed value of said given parameter;
“Compressed value” designates the compressed value of said given parameter;
“Offset” corresponds to an offset value defined according to the typical value and the range of dispersion known in production; and
“Granularity” corresponds to the size of the smallest interval between two values obtained after decompression.
The invention furthermore relates to a computer programme product that can be downloaded from a communication network and/or recorded on a medium that can be read by computer and/or executed by a processor, comprising programme code instructions for the execution of the steps of the aforementioned methods, when said programme is executed on a computer.
The invention also relates to a storage means, that may be totally or partially removable, that can be read by a computer, storing a set of instructions that can be executed by said computer in order to implement the aforementioned methods.
Other characteristics and advantages of embodiments of the invention shall appear during the reading of the following description of a particular embodiment of the invention, given by way of an informative and non-limiting example (all of the embodiments of the invention are not limited to the characteristics and advantages of this particular embodiment), and the annexed drawings, wherein:
a to 4c show the principle of discretising the values of the calibration parameters, according to a particular embodiment of the invention;
In relation with
It is supposed that, during the initialisation, the module executes a radio communication programme (also called functional software) stored in a first non-volatile external memory.
During a first step E11, the module reads compressed calibration parameters in a second non-volatile memory. In a particular embodiment, the second non-volatile memory is internal to the module.
During a step E12, the module executes a decompressing programme (for example stored in the first non-volatile external memory) making it possible to decompress each compressed calibration parameter read in step E11.
Then, during a step E13, the module stores, for example, in a third external volatile memory the decompressed calibration parameters from step E12.
Finally, during a step E14, the module is initialised with the values of the decompressed calibration parameters obtained in step E12.
The method of compressing of the invention is based on the use of a mathematical model of the operation of a power amplifier built into a radio communication module on the one hand and on a discretisation of ranges of potential values for each minimal calibration parameter on the other hand. The method of compressing of the invention makes it possible for example to obtain a set of reduced calibration parameters in a memory space less than 200 bits. As such, it is possible to carry out and to produce a radio communication module without internal volatile memory dedicated to storing calibration parameters.
All of the calibration parameters in current use are not necessary. It is necessary to store only the parameters (called minimal calibration parameters) of which the effects of the dispersion in production have an impact on the quality of the radio communication module.
Appendix 1 shows a list of minimal calibration parameters needed for the proper operation of the radio communication module and a calculation example of the minimal size of ROM (for “Read Only Memory”) memory needed to store these minimal calibration parameters. This appendix is an integral part of this description.
As already indicated, the mathematical modelling of the operation of the power amplifier built into the radio communication module, makes it possible to substitute for the current storage of the setting to be programmed for each power level, the parameters of the equation making it possible to obtain this setting.
In relation with
Note that the offset corresponds to an offset defined according to the typical value and range of dispersion known in production.
Note also that the granularity is defined according to the sensitivity of the results of the output power on the calibration parameter.
In all the rest of this document, the following definitions shall be considered:
It is important to note that the 94-bit binary sequence SEQ1 (i.e. the compressed result) is comprised of all of the compressed values C88, coded in binary, then placed end to end.
In the first column C81 of the table TAB1, three types of parameters are distinguished (Rx, AFC and Tx):
A total of 21 radiofrequency calibration parameters are obtained for a size of approximately 300 bits.
The invention is based on the following observation: As shown in
As shown in 4c, the operation of discretisation consists in dividing the range of “useful” values into a finite set of discrete values, separated by a step of which the value must be defined specifically for each parameter to be stored.
The initial value of the parameter shall be rounded to the nearest discrete value.
Each calibration parameter is compressed according to a compression formula defined by:
Compressed value=E((Initial value−Offset)/Granularity)
where
“Compressed value” designates the compressed value of the parameter;
“Initial value” designates the discrete value of the parameter to be compressed;
“Offset” corresponds to an offset value defined according to the typical value and the range of dispersion known in production;
“Granularity” corresponds to the size of the smallest interval between two values obtained after decompression (in other terms it corresponds to the step of discretisation to be applied); and
“E” designates the notation of the integer function.
In this embodiment (in reference to
In relation with
During a first step E21, a calibration parameter is selected, according to a dispersion criterion relative to the quality of the radio communication module. The radio communication module must be initialised with an initial value. Note that the selected parameter has a value which is comprised in an initial range of possible values. The initial range is centred on an average value and is in function of the dispersion of the module.
During a step E22, for the parameter selected in step E21, a range of useful values is obtained, of a size that is less than the initial range of values and an average value of the parameter.
During a step E23, for the parameter selected in step E21, a maximum error value on the parameter is obtained, in such a way as to maintain an operation of the radio communication module that complies with its specifications.
Then, during a step E24, the range of useful values obtained in step E22 is discretised, then a discrete value of the parameter selected in step E21 is obtained, by choosing the discrete value that is nearest to the initial value.
Finally, during a step E25, the discrete value obtained in step E24 is compressed according to the discrete value, the range of useful values (step E22), the average value of the parameter (step E22) and the maximum error value (step E23).
The use of a process for reducing the size results in an unavoidable operation of decompression. The latter is specific to the mode of compression used, and is carried out during the initialisation of the radio communication module, i.e. during the execution of the radio communication programme by the module. In a particular embodiment, the radio communication programme and the decompressing programme are stored in the same non-volatile external memory.
Each calibration parameter is decompressed according to a compression formula defined by:
Decompressed value=Offset+(Granularity*compressed value)
where
“Decompressed value” designates the decompressed value of the given parameter;
“Compressed value” designates the compressed value of the given parameter;
“Offset” corresponds to an offset value defined according to the typical value and the range of dispersion known in production; and
“Granularity” corresponds to the size of the smallest interval between two values obtained after decompression (in other terms it corresponds to the step of discretisation to be applied).
In relation with
The 94-bit binary sequence SEQ1 is that obtained in the example of compressing described in
The table TAB2 shows the minimal calibration parameters, for the particular case of a radio communication module of the GSM quad-band type. The first column C91 of the table indicates the type of parameter (Rx, AFC and Tx). The second column C92 indicates the name of the calibration parameters (for example “BoardGain_GSM900”). The third column C93 of the table indicates the compressed value of the calibration parameter. The fourth C94 and fifth C95 columns of the table indicate the compression parameters, i.e. the offset and the granularity. The sixth column C96 of the table indicates the decompressed value of the calibration parameter.
In relation with
During a first step E31, a compressed calibration parameter stored in an internal non-volatile memory is read in the radio communication module.
During a step E32, for the parameter read in step E31, an offset value is obtained that was defined during the compression of the parameter, according to a range of useful values, of a size that is less than the initial range, and of an average value of the parameter.
Then, during a step E33, for the parameter read in step E31, a granularity value is obtained, that was defined during the compression of the parameter, according to a maximum error value on the parameter.
Finally, during a step E34, the compressed value of the parameter read in step E31 is decompressed according to the compressed value, the offset value obtained in step E32 and the granularity value obtained in step E33.
The example of the radio communication module 10 according to prior art, shown in
Conventionally, and as already explained hereinabove, this module 10 is intended to be transferred onto a printed circuit of a radio communication device (portable telephone, modem, or any other device making use of a wireless standard).
In relation with
As also shown in
In a particular embodiment, the computer programme 330, when it is executed, also implements at least partially the following functional blocks (described in reference to
By way of example, hereinafter is presented a list of minimal calibration parameters (also referred to as essential calibration parameters) that are needed for the proper operation of the radio communication module and a calculation example of the minimal size of ROM (for “Read Only Memory”) memory needed to store the aforementioned minimal calibration parameters.
Minimal calibration parameter refers to a parameter of which the effects of the dispersion in production have an impact on the quality of the radio communication module. In the example discussed, the minimal calibration parameters are compressed then stored in an internal non-volatile memory in the module, for example a ROM memory. Note that the minimal calibration parameters can be stored in any type of OTP (for “One Time Programmable”) memory.
It is important to note that all of the other parameters stored in the non-volatile memory of the communication module can be “hard coded” in the radio communication programme (i.e. the functional software).
The calculation of the minimal size of ROM memory needed, shown hereinafter, is based on the results of the “run Q2686-PR2”, i.e. 400 modules, with components all stemming from the same batch. This is therefore representative only of a dispersion within a batch, not a batch-to-batch dispersion. Note that a “run” means “series” in a familiar language. The “Run Q2686-PR2” means the production of a series of Prototype (here, the second, since “PR2” means “Prototype Run n02”) of the “Q2686” product.
The minimal sizes expressed above as u4, u6 or u8 result in for u4=4 bits, u6=6 bits and u8=8 bits. “u” simply stands for “unsigned” i.e. the number is unsigned binary-coded (positive integer). This is a minimum of bit needed to code the information that is essential for the calibration of the 126-bit module (4×u4+u6+4×u8+12×u6=4×4+6+4×8+12×6=126)
a) Reduction in the coding resolution of certain parameters characterising the amplifier. More feedback on the batch-to-batch dispersion seems however desirable before attempting an excessive discretisation of these parameters.
b) The parameter characterising the “Poff” amplifier seems to be rather similar for the two low bands and the two high bands. A study carried out on 200 modules shows that the difference between the Poffs is from −0.6 to +0.3 dB on the low bands, and from −0.5 to +1.1 dB on the high bands.
c) Similarities also between the M parameters on the two low bands and the two high bands. On 200 modules the difference between the Ms is from −1.4 to +1.4 on the low bands, and from −2.3 to +0.5 on the high bands.
d) Idem for the parameter Nmin, with, on 200 modules a difference between the Nmin between −22 and 4 on the low bands, and from 4 to 13 on the high bands.
e) For the N_PCLmax parameter, on 200 modules the difference of −15 and +25 on the low bands, and −23 to +56 on the high bands. The operation seems to be less profitable.
f) In conclusion, it is observed that one could, for the low bands as well as for the high bands, code only the parameters corresponding to the Europe bands, and only code one offset in relation to the latter, for the US bands. This is also valid for the N_PCLmax. This is a way to make use of the existing correlation between the two low bands and the two high bands. The following table would then be obtained:
The savings in the number of bits used is not so obvious. Indeed, only 6 bits would be saved.
This comes from the fact that the initial study already takes into account the fact that the range of “useful” values (coming from the ranges observed in production) is reduced, and that the size of the variable has already been reduced consequently.
It appears interesting, at this stage in thought, to analyse the influence of the precision of the various parameters that characterise the power amplifier (noted in what follows) on the final calibration error.
It is considered, at the base, that the residual error of the initial calibration (error made when the determination of the parameters by iterative calculation) is +0.4 dB.
Any error tied to a reduction in the resolution of the parameters will be added to this initial error.
If the equation characterising the RF power amplifier RF is considered:
P=M log(k)+Poff+M log(N−Nmin)
where
k is the constant that characterises the digital/analogue convertor (noted in what follows as DAC), with in this case, log(k)=−2.78;
P: RF power output of the product expressed in dBm;
M: Parameter characterising the RF power amplifier (similar to a “slope”);
Poff: Parameter characterising the RF power amplifier (similar to an offset);
N: Numerical value applied to the digital-analogue convertor generating the desired voltage applied to the amplifier;
Nmin: Parameter characterising the RF power amplifier.
The incidence of the resolution of the three parameters M, Nmin and Poff can be estimated by deriving the function partially on these parameters and by increasing the derivative using the extreme values of the parameters, observed on the PR2 (400 modules only). This here entails estimating what are the most sensitive parameters rather than putting a precise figure on the incidence on the precision (insufficient number of boards produced).
With:
That is to say, practically, that a variation of 1 on the parameter M will have as an incidence a maximal error of 0.2 dB on the calibration (value calculated using the range observed in production, on 400 modules).
More concretely, than in the case where it would be chosen have a parameter M in common for the two low or high bands, the error generated would be of a magnitude of 0.6 dB.
In the same way, a variation of 1 on the Nmin parameter will have as an incidence a maximum error of 0.12 dB on the calibration (value calculated using the range observed in production, on 400 modules).
In the case where it would be chosen to have a parameter Nmin in common for the two low or high bands, the error generated would be of a magnitude of 3 dB.
A variation of 0.1 dB on the Poff parameter having the same incidence on the calibration error, it would be advantageous to maintain its current resolution for this parameter, i.e. 0.1 dB.
This here entails the most sensitive parameter, and having this parameter in common for the two low or high bands, taking the study carried out above into account, would result in an error of 1.6 dB.
Here is a concrete example of reducing the coding resolution of the various parameters, based on the previous study:
and by taking MMAX<36.5; NMIN>700 and NminMAX<110, a max. sensitivity of 0.027 dB/DAC step is obtained;
The purpose of this parameter is a fine calibration of the max PCL, the most sensitive PCL, from a customer standpoint as well as from a VCF standpoint. The determination of this value is carried out very precisely by the test bench.
If an imprecision on this power of 0.2 dB is tolerated (not enough to saturate the PA), it can be concluded from this that the resolution could be reduced to 8 DAC steps. This is 3 bits saved, and a size for the variable that changes from u8 to u5 (32 steps). Thus, for example, 32 values stepped from 700 to 948.
Total savings would therefore be 12 bits.
This means that it can be considered, for example, switching to a resolution of 2 steps, which would generate an error of 0.24 dB;
The 4 u6 variables would become u5 variables (32 steps) which is a total savings of 4 bits.
The total savings generated would then be 12 bits for an error of 0.16 dB.
Here is a summary of the proposal:
The sum of the errors generated by this proposal is 0.6 dB, which, added to an initial error of calibration algo of ±0.4 dB, gives a cumulative error of ±1 dB.
The number of bits needed to store this calibration would then be 94.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06/03064 | Apr 2006 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/050854 | 1/29/2007 | WO | 00 | 6/1/2009 |