This invention relates generally to the field of ceramic materials, and more particularly to a method of joining ceramic elements.
Gas turbine engines are known to include a compressor section for supplying a flow of compressed combustion air, a combustor section for burning a fuel in the compressed combustion air, and a turbine section for extracting thermal energy from the combustion air and converting that energy into mechanical energy in the form of a shaft rotation. Many parts of the combustor section and turbine section are exposed directly to the hot combustion gasses, for example the combustor, the transition duct between the combustor and the turbine section, and the turbine stationary vanes, rotating blades and surrounding ring segments.
It is also known that increasing the firing temperature of the combustion gas may increase the power and efficiency of a combustion turbine. Modern high efficiency combustion turbines have firing temperatures in excess of 1,600 degrees C., which is well in excess of the safe operating temperature of the structural materials used in the hot gas flow path components. Special super alloy materials have been developed for use in such high temperature environments, and these materials have been used with specific cooling arrangements, including film cooling, backside cooling and insulation.
Ceramic and ceramic matrix composite (CMC) materials offer the potential for higher operating temperatures than do metal alloy materials, due to the inherent refractory nature of ceramic materials. This capability may be translated into a reduced cooling requirement that, in turn, may result in higher power, greater efficiency, and/or reduced emissions from the engine.
Prior art ceramic turbine airfoil members may be formed with an associated shroud or platform member. The platform defines a flow path between adjacent airfoil members for directing the hot combustion gasses past the airfoil members. The platform is exposed to the same high temperature gas environment as the airfoil member and thus may be formed of a ceramic material. The platform and the airfoil members may be formed as separate components that are unconnected and are allowed to have relative movement between them. However, such designs may not adequately transfer aerodynamic torque loads from the airfoil to the platform attachments. Alternatively, the platform and the airfoil may be formed as separate components that are mechanically joined together, as illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 5,226,789. Such mechanical joints must be robust, and thus tend to be complicated and expensive.
Another alternative for joining the airfoil and the platform is to form the platform and the airfoil as a single integral part. Monolithic ceramic is readily moldable to a form, but it is limited to small shapes and is insufficiently strain-tolerant for robust designs. CMC materials incorporate ceramic fibers in a ceramic matrix for enhanced mechanical strength and ductility. However, conventional ceramic composite processing methods increase in complexity and cost in a complex three-dimensional component such as a turbine vane. U.S. Pat. No. 6,200,092 describes a turbine nozzle assembly having a vane forward segment formed of CMC material wherein the reinforcing fibers are specially oriented across the juncture of the airfoil and the platform members. Such special fiber placement in the airfoil-to-platform transition region presents a manufacturing challenge, especially with insulated CMC construction. Furthermore, for some CMC compositions, shrinkage during processing may result in residual stresses in complex shapes that are geometrically constrained. The airfoil-to-platform attachment area is one area where such stresses would arise. Additionally, load transfer between the airfoil and the platform results in interlaminar stresses in the fillet region where mechanical properties may be compromised.
In one solution to these problems, U.S. Pat. No. 6,648,597 discloses a method of manufacture for a vane component of a gas turbine, including: forming an airfoil member of a ceramic matrix composite material; forming a platform member of a ceramic matrix composite material; and forming an integral vane component by bonding respective joint surfaces of the airfoil member and the platform member. The method may further include: forming the airfoil member of a ceramic matrix composite material in a green body state; forming the platform member of a ceramic matrix composite material in a green body state; and urging the respective joint surfaces of the airfoil member and the platform member together at a firing temperature to form a sinter bond between them. The method may include densifying the sinter bond with a matrix infiltration process. The method may further include reinforcing the sinter bond with a fastener connected between the respective joint surfaces. Alternatively, the method may include bonding the respective joint surfaces of the airfoil member and the platform member with an adhesive. However, ceramic joints using refractory adhesives alone are weak and unreliable for carrying primary loads (mechanical, unrelenting loads). Furthermore, when such adhesives are applied to already-fired CMC parts in constrained geometries, the adhesives shrink and produce bond joint cracking.
The invention is explained in following description in view of the drawings that show:
A refractory adhesive 42 may be applied in the joining step. This fills any clearance between the outer joining portion 32 and the inner joining portion 38. For example a high temperature ceramic adhesive such as from Cotronics® (Resbond 989 or 904), Aremco® (Ceramabond 503, 600, or 516), Sauerizon® (phosphate based adhesives), or Zircar® (ZR-COM) or variations on these basic adhesive types may be used. Shrinkage cracking in refractory adhesives is greatly reduced in the present method, because the outer joining portion 32 shrinks concurrently with the adhesive 42 and radially follows and compresses the adhesive. If an adhesive 42 or other filler is not used, the joining portions 32 and 38 may be formed and/or machined to minimize clearance between them. The outer joining portion 32 may be formed by CMC layering or continuous wrapping of ceramic fibers onto the inner joining portion 38 using the inner joining portion 38 as a form or mandrel for the outer joining portion 32 to eliminate all clearance there between. The fibers are impregnated with a ceramic matrix material, either before or after the wrapping step, to form a ceramic matrix composite material.
In
The ceramics utilized for the CMC materials in the joined parts may be oxide or non-oxide materials, for example alumina, mullite, silicon carbide, etc. The CMC compression ring 54 windings can be made with fibers other than those in the cylinder 50 or flange 52 pieces. Fibers with higher shrinkage, such as Nextel® 610 fibers (alumina) can be used in the compression ring versus Nextel® 720 fibers (alumina/mullite) typically used for the other parts. The higher shrinkage of the compression ring fibers imparts an even greater amount of prestress to the joint. Furthermore, the alumina fibers exhibit a greater coefficient of thermal expansion than do the alumina/mullite fibers, thereby imparting an additional amount of prestress as a result of the differential thermal expansion between the two types of fibers. The amount of prestress created by the drying shrinkage, the firing shrinkage and the thermal expansion of the mating parts can be selected to achieve a desired degree of prestress for both cold and hot conditions for any particular application. In one test embodiment, it was found that the combination of stresses imposed by drying and firing shrinkage and by differential thermal expansion was actually too high and resulted in an overstress condition in a CMC material containing Nextel® 610 fibers that were wet wrapped around a fully fired CMC member containing Nextel® 720 fibers. In order to reduce the level of prestress in such an embodiment, the Nextel® 610 fibers could be wet wrapped around a green body CMC member containing Nextel® 720 fibers, for example.
The vane airfoil 70 and/or the platform member 76 may be produced from a plurality of individual parts that are bonded or joined together in any variety of ways, or they may be formed as single-piece parts. The platform member 76 may be formed in two or more parts that are joined together during the joining step for the present method, with or without additional joining methods.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions may be made without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/245,528, filed Sep. 17, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,093,359, incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2477375 | Jablonsky | Jul 1949 | A |
3137602 | Lincoln | Jun 1964 | A |
3854189 | Ezis et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3910716 | Roughgarden et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4122894 | Laws et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4330568 | Boehm et al. | May 1982 | A |
4396349 | Hueber | Aug 1983 | A |
4519745 | Rosman et al. | May 1985 | A |
4530884 | Erickson et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4563125 | Boudigues et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4563128 | Rossmann | Jan 1986 | A |
4629397 | Schweitzer | Dec 1986 | A |
4639189 | Rosman | Jan 1987 | A |
4643636 | Libertini et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4645421 | Huether | Feb 1987 | A |
4768924 | Carrier et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4790721 | Morris et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4838031 | Cramer | Jun 1989 | A |
4907946 | Ciokajlo et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5027604 | Krueger | Jul 1991 | A |
5062767 | Worley et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5226789 | Donges | Jul 1993 | A |
5306554 | Harrison et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5314309 | Blakeley et al. | May 1994 | A |
5328331 | Bunker et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5358379 | Pepperman et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5375978 | Evans et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5382453 | Mason | Jan 1995 | A |
5439627 | De Jager | Aug 1995 | A |
5484258 | Isburgh et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5493855 | Walters et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5494402 | Glezer et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5584652 | Shaffer et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5605046 | Liang | Feb 1997 | A |
5616001 | Boyd | Apr 1997 | A |
5630700 | Olsen et al. | May 1997 | A |
5640767 | Jackson et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5720597 | Wang et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5791879 | Fitzgerald et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5820337 | Jackson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5879766 | Kato | Mar 1999 | A |
5881775 | Owen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887332 | Champenois et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6000906 | Draskovich | Dec 1999 | A |
6063328 | Kato | May 2000 | A |
6126889 | Scott et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6164903 | Kouris | Dec 2000 | A |
6197424 | Morrison et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200092 | Koschier | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6241469 | Beeck et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6315941 | Keller et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325593 | Darkins, Jr. et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6368663 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6451416 | Holowczak et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6514046 | Morrison et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6592695 | Polis et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6617013 | Morrison et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6648597 | Widrig et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
7371043 | Keller | May 2008 | B2 |
7413700 | Merrill et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
20030012939 | Carper | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030207155 | Morrison et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223861 | Morrison et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20080107521 | Morrison et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080284059 | Merrill et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050254942 A1 | Nov 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10245528 | Sep 2002 | US |
Child | 11188406 | US |