This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to European application 14 000 178.5, filed Jan. 17, 2014, the entire disclosure of which is herein expressly incorporated by reference.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention relate to kinematic ranging techniques.
Kinematic ranging per se is a known electronic counter-counter-measure technique, in which the range of a moving airborne jammer may be estimated by use of a radar unit without the need for the unit to actively interrogate the jammer, i.e. the radar unit may work in a passive mode to detect and process the jammer signals. In the specific examples of the invention described below, the radar unit is an airborne detecting radar unit. Kinematic ranging is described for example in “Kinematic Ranging for IRST”, SPIE Vol 1950, Acquisition, Tracking and Pointing VII (1993).
Referring to
where α1 and α2 are the bearings in azimuth of the jammer at times t1 and t2 with respect to positions 14 and 16 respectively. The angle Δβ between the straight line connecting positions 14 and 10 and the displacement 22 is given by
Δβ is the angle in the azimuthal plane between the straight line joining the position of the airborne detector radar at time t1 and the position of the jammer at t2 and the straight line corresponding to the displacement of the airborne detector radar during the interval Δt. Using the sine rule, the range R of the jammer from the airborne detecting radar at time t2 is given by
The range R of the jammer from the second position 16 of the airborne detecting radar may be therefore be calculated by measuring the bearings α1, α2 in azimuth of the jammer at the times t1, t2 with respect to the airborne detecting radar unit, the rate of change dα/dt of the bearing in azimuth of the jammer with respect to the position 14, the components Δx, Δy of the displacement 22 corresponding to the manoeuvre 20 of the airborne detecting radar, and the time interval Δt.
A disadvantage of the known method of kinematic ranging is that when the airborne detecting radar unit carries out a general manoeuvre 20, corresponding to a general displacement such as 22, the final result for the range R typically involves a significant level of uncertainty as a result of measurement errors associated with the values of α1, α2, dα/dt, Δt, Δx and Δy.
The present invention provides a method of kinematic ranging comprising the steps of:
and also characterised in that the range R of the jammer from the second position is calculated according to
The invention provides the advantage that the range R may be measured with a desired relative range accuracy by causing the airborne radar detector to carry out the manoeuvre d having the calculated displacement components Δx, Δy in the horizontal plane.
In order to provide the possibility of a further increase in the accuracy of the determined range R, preferably the method further comprises the steps of
In some embodiments, the method may be applied to the simultaneous determination of the range of two jammers, in which case the method preferably further includes the steps of:
This ensure the greatest overall accuracy in the determined ranges of the two jammers.
Embodiments of the invention are described below by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Using Gauss' law in conjunction with Equation 2, the variance in the range R of the jammer is given by
where σ2Δβ, σ2Δα, and σ2d are the variances in the angles Δβ, Δα and in the displacement d respectively. Inserting the derivatives of Equation 2 into Equation 3 gives an expression for the relative range accuracy σR/R:
which is minimised when
cot2(Δβ)=0
and Δα and d are as large as possible. cot2 (Δβ)=0 if Δβ=π/2; combining this with Equation 1 gives
or equivalently
Δy=−tan(α1+{dot over (α)}·Δt)·Δx
For Δβ=π/2, Equations 2 and 3 can be written as
Taking d=7000 m, dt=5 s and v=250 m/s, and assuming that α1=−20° and {dot over (α)}=0.2°/s, the components Δx, Δy of the displacement d are
Δx=cos(α1+{dot over (α)}·Δt)·d=cos(−20°+6.6°)·d≈6810 m
Δy=−sin(α1+{dot over (α)}·Δt)·d=−sin(−20°+6.6°)·d≈1620 m
If the airborne detector radar carries out the manoeuvre 20 using these components of the displacement d, then the error in the measurement of the range R has a relative range accuracy of 20% or better.
and the range Rn of the nth jammer is given by
In
The foregoing disclosure has been set forth merely to illustrate the invention and is not intended to be limiting. Since modifications of the disclosed embodiments incorporating the spirit and substance of the invention may occur to persons skilled in the art, the invention should be construed to include everything within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
14000178 | Jan 2014 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4581767 | Monsen | Apr 1986 | A |
5278908 | Parikh | Jan 1994 | A |
5361073 | Hansen | Nov 1994 | A |
5378155 | Eldridge | Jan 1995 | A |
5483240 | Hsu | Jan 1996 | A |
6084540 | Yu | Jul 2000 | A |
6417799 | Aubain | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6510388 | Sporrong | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6697008 | Sternowski | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6771220 | Ashe | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6839017 | Dillman | Jan 2005 | B1 |
7427947 | Dark | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7478578 | Kirkpatrick | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7511657 | Dark | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7515096 | Dark | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7737883 | Dark | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7847723 | Dark | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7893866 | Dark | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8588998 | Molander | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20030071749 | Yu | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040027257 | Yannone | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20070210953 | Abraham | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090224956 | Dark | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 187 233 | May 2010 | EP |
2 923 300 | May 2009 | FR |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report dated Jun. 20, 2014 (Nine (9) pages). |
J. M. Passerieux et al: “Optimal Observer Maneuver for Bearings-Only Tracking”, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, IEEE Service Center, vol. 34, No. 3, Jul. 1, 1998, pp. 777-788, Piscataway, NJ, US, XP002290216, (Twelve (12) pages). |
A. Logothetis et al: “Comparison of Suboptimal Strategies for Optimal Own-Ship Maneuvers in Bearings-Only Tracking”, Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE CAT. No. 98CH36207), vol. 6, Jan. 1, pp. 3334-3338, XP055122391, (Five (5) pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150204967 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |