This invention concerns a method of machining mechanical workpieces, in particular of machining the flat surfaces of a brake disc for vehicles. The invention also concerns a work centre that operates in accordance with the method of the invention.
The invention is particularly, though not exclusively, suited to applications in the specific field of mechanical-workpiece surface machining where a balanced, centred division of the excess metal thickness removed from each of a pair of opposed surfaces is required.
A typical application is that relating to the machining of the opposed flat surfaces of a brake disc for vehicles. In this case, the surface finishing (turning, for example) requires the removal of excess metal thicknesses from these surfaces in a balanced, centred manner in relation to the brake disc's median plane of symmetry, for obvious reasons of weight balancing.
In this field, the above-mentioned operations are typically carried out by clamping the brake disc on the chuck of the machine tool by the engagement of gripping clamps of the workpiece-holder device, for example, a gripper or self-centring chuck, in the radial passages which are created in the disc during the casting of the semifinished workpiece, and which constitute the finned cooling ducts of the brake disc. Clamping the workpiece in this way defines a median reference plane relative to which the excess metal thicknesses to be removed from each of the flat disc surfaces are measured.
One of the main limitations encountered in the known applications lies in the fact that the clamping of the disc in the region of the above-mentioned median plane allows only one of the disc surfaces to be machined because the tools cannot gain access to the other disc surface, i.e. the surface facing the chuck, due to the presence of the clamping device. Once one surface of the disc has been machined, the disc must be positioned and clamped on the chuck a second time to allow the other, opposite surface to be machined.
This double positioning consequently involves an increase in cycle times with a corresponding extension of overall production times and increase in costs. A second positioning could also affect the precision of the required dimensions and tolerances, especially when it is considered that the machined disc surfaces must generally meet fairly tight tolerances of flatness and mutual parallelism.
One of the main objects of the invention is to make available a method of machining mechanical workpieces, in particular of machining the flat surfaces of a brake disc for vehicles, which is designed to overcome all the limitations encountered in the prior art described above.
This and other objects that will become clear from the following description are achieved by a machining method of the above-mentioned type, designed in accordance with the appended claims.
Further characteristics and advantages of the invention will be more effectively illustrated by the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention, which Is given purely by way of non-limiting example with reference to the appended drawings, in which:
With Initial reference to
It must, however, be understood that the example described is merely a preferred selection of application since the method of the invention could equally well be applied to any machining operation carried out on any workpiece where a particular requirement is the balanced division of the excess metal to be removed from each of a pair of opposed flat surfaces.
For the sake of simplicity, this description will therefore refer hereafter to the specific application of the method to the semifinished brake disc 1, for the machining of the opposed disc surfaces 2 and 3 thereof.
The brake disc, whose central axis of rotation is marked X, comprises a plurality of radial passages 4 that extend radially in the thickness of the disc between the surfaces 2 and 3. These passages are created when the semifinished workpiece is cast and are spaced angularly at regular intervals to act as ducts that convey air between pairs of corresponding sets of fins to cool the disc braking surfaces.
The semifinished disc surface also comprises a central hub portion 5 that protrudes integrally from the annular area of the braking surfaces 2, 3 and takes the form of an outer cylindrical wall closed by a flange 6 and equipped with one or more brake-disc attachment holes.
A first step of the method of the invention (
More specifically, the handling device 7 has a support plate 12 which is supported so as to be rotatable about a central axis C′ of the plate, and from which a plurality of clamps 13 for gripping the workpiece (preferably three or six clamps, with regular angular spacing) project, all in the same direction. The free ends of the clamps bear respective gripping push rods 14 that extend transversally relative to the axis C′ for the centred radial gripping and clamping of the workpiece. The gripping push rods 14 advantageously form part of a gripper for the self-centred clamping of the workpiece in relation to the axis C′. The handling device 7 moves along a system of controlled axes so that its position (the positioning co-ordinates) can be determined In relation to the system of working axes of the station 8.
As shown in greater detail in
In a second step of the method (
In a subsequent step (
In a further, subsequent step, the work station tools are driven along their respective working paths for the machining of the surfaces 2 and 3 with removal of the preselected excess thicknesses of material in a balanced, centred manner.
The clamping of the disc 1 in the self-centering tool of the chuck 10 advantageously allows the machine tools access to each of disc surfaces 2 and 3 by means of one and only one positioning of the disc on the chuck, achieved by means of the steps described above. The configuration and size of the self-centering clamping device of the chuck are such as to allow the tool (indicated 16) to have access to the surface 3 such that it can machine up to the smaller diameter of the annular braking area as shown in
In a variant, shown in
In use, as a result of the relative sliding between the annular element and the tapered guide, brought about by an axial pulling force exerted on the annular element, the surface 21 is urged transversely relative to the axis C against the hub portion 5 so as to exert the force for the clamping the disc on the chuck. Due to the axial symmetry of the tapered guide, the edging action of the annular element is self-centering and thus ensures centered claming of the disc on the chuck.
Advantageously, the overall weight of the gripper 17 is less than that of devices with conventional self-centering clamps and this brings about a consequent reduction in the centrifugal forces generated during the chuck rotation. The clamping forces on the chuck can be reduced for a given chuck speed, or the speed of rotation of the chuck can be increased for a given clamping force applied. In the first case, since the clamping forces of the chuck clamps tend to deform the workpiece, the state of deformation can be reduced by lowering gripping forces. In the second case, on the other hand, it is possible to achieve relatively high cutting speeds that could not be used with conventional self-centering clamps.
The invention therefore achieves the proposed objects by offering numerous advantages over known solutions.
A first advantage lies in the fact that the method of the invention allows machining to be carried out on both of the opposed surfaces of a disc with one and only one positioning of the disc on the chuck. Workpiece loading/unloading times and hence the overall cycle time is consequently reduced.
Another advantage lies in the fact that the single positioning required allows greater precision to be achieved in surface machining operations, with particular reference to the required tolerances of flatness and parallelism between opposed working surfaces of the disc.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IT03/00133 | 3/5/2003 | WO | 00 | 8/18/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/078413 | 9/16/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2733072 | Hohwart et al. | Jan 1956 | A |
3458209 | Scholz | Jul 1969 | A |
4708041 | Granger | Nov 1987 | A |
5299476 | Tommasini et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
6619163 | Tanio et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
7083504 | Fukao et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7185573 | Gatton | Mar 2007 | B1 |
20020066185 | Loustanau et al | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20050102818 | Caldana | May 2005 | A1 |
20070227318 | Biertz et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3911718 | Oct 1990 | DE |
3431050 | Feb 1992 | DE |
4028576 | Mar 1992 | DE |
10126900 | Aug 2002 | DE |
WO 9962655 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 2007086084 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060230888 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |