The present disclosure relates to razor blades in general and, more particularly, to a razor blade having a bent portion and a method and apparatus for manufacturing the same.
Many modern safety razors include a disposable razor cartridge adapted to be selectively connected to a reusable handle by connecting structure therebetween. The cartridge includes a frame having at least one razor blade with a sharpened cutting edge disposed therein. Other modern safety razors include a razor cartridge permanently connected to the handle that can be disposed of as a single unit.
The performance and commercial success of a razor cartridge is a balance of many factors and characteristics that include rinsability i.e. the ability of the user to be able to easily rinse cut hair and skin particles and other shaving debris from the razor cartridge and especially from between adjacent razor blades or razor blade structures such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,586,255 to Jacobson.
A razor cartridge including a razor blade having a bent portion can have certain advantages and there have been many proposals to provide a razor cartridge with such a razor blade. Some examples are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,389,773 to Nissen et al, several to Jacobson including U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,442,598, 5,010,646 to Neamtu, U.S. Pat. No. 6,804,886 to Wain and also G.B. patent 2,055,069 to Davis, the latter two patents ('886 and G.B. '069) going on to disclose methods of forming the razor blade using a press tool. However, such razor cartridges have not been successfully commercialized or at least not manufactured on a scale that is significant in a mass market such as that of razor cartridges. Many manufacturers emulate a bent razor blade by mounting a generally planar razor blade on a bent support made from a material both thicker and softer than a typical hardened razor blade. The aforementioned '255 patent includes an example of such a construction.
Challenges to the manufacture of a commercially acceptable razor cartridge with a bent blade include manufacturing issues such as cracking occurring in a hardened blade body in the vicinity of the bend and more especially on the outer surface of the bend. While cracks of a micro scale located in the outer surface of the bend may be acceptable, cracks of a macro scale can have the following disadvantages: a crack itself is a fracture in the blade body but also provides an initiation site that facilitates further fracture or even breakage of the razor blade during normal use when mounted in its cartridge housing. Cracks also can provide initiation sites for accelerated corrosion that can also result in failure of the razor blade. Failure or fracture of a razor blade can result in nicks and cuts for the user.
The present disclosure has for its objective to eliminate, or at least substantially alleviate the limitations of the prior art razor blade arrangements. The present disclosure is directed particularly to a method of making a razor blade having a bent portion. The razor blade has a cutting edge and a back edge portion, a bent portion between the cutting edge and the back edge portion, and first and second generally planar portions respectively between the cutting edge and the bent portion and the bent portion and the back edge portion.
The razor blade is manufactured from an elongated strip of stainless steel. The stainless steel has a carbon content preferably less than about 0.60%, more preferably between about 0.45% and about 0.55% and can also comprise between about 1.0% and about 1.6% molybdenum, both by weight. The stainless steel strip is preferably equal or less than 0.1 mm thick, preferably 0.076 mm and can be 0.025-0.05 mm thick. The stainless steel strip is preferably about 3 mm wide but can be any width to suit the application at hand. The stainless steel strip is hardened to about 660-850 HV and the strip provided with a cutting edge along at least one edge. As disclosed herein, cited hardness values use the Vickers scale at a load of 0.5 kg. The cutting edge is provided with suitable coatings that can include a hard carbon material and an outer coating of a cured fluoropolymer, preferably PTFE. The (PTFE) curing process has a secondary effect of annealing the strip to reduce the hardness of the strip to at least 600 HV and preferably about 620-640 HV. A lengthwise extending portion of the strip is removed to provide a discrete razor blade. The bent portion of the razor blade is preferably formed by swivel bending processes as described herein. By this method, when the forming results in an included angle of less than 118 degrees and preferably about 90 degrees between the first and second planar portions, in combination with a minimum inside bend radius less than 0.50 mm and preferably about 0.30-0.35 mm, the outer surface of the bent portion is substantially free from macro-cracks. In the context of the present disclosure a macro-crack is defined as a crack in the outer surface of the bend having a depth greater than ⅔ the thickness of the strip.
In a further aspect, the razor blade can include one or more apertures. The process step to perforate the apertures can occur after the discrete razor blade is cut from the strip and before the bent portion is formed.
A plurality of blades in accordance with the aforementioned description, can be conveniently mounted in a cartridge housing which can provide a razor cartridge.
In addition the present disclosure describes embodiments of forming tooling for making razor blades having a bent portion.
An advantage of the disclosed razor blade having a bent portion is that it can be used in a razor cartridge as an alternative to a planar razor blade mounted on a thicker bent support. Avoidance of the thicker bent support facilitates improved rinsability of the cartridge. Use of the disclosed stainless steel material in combination with the disclosed method of bending can avoid any necessity to provide a local secondary heat treatment process to a portion of the blade body to enhance ductility and results in a bent portion having its outer surface substantially free of macro-cracks. However, a localized heat treatment process can be used with the present material and method combination if desired. Premature failure of the razor blade is avoided or the probability of failure is substantially diminished, thereby improving safety for the user.
The above features and advantages will be more fully understood with reference to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Martensitic stainless steels having a carbon content 0.6-0.7% or more, about 13% chromium and substantially free of molybdenum are widely used for making razor blades. These materials are widely available, have adequate corrosion resistance for their intended use and can be sharpened to provide a high quality cutting edge. However, these materials are somewhat brittle and razor blades formed thereof are not readily bent without cracking or fracturing. U.S. Patent application publications 2007/0124939 and 2007/0234577 disclose methods of locally heat treating a portion of a hardened razor blade body to enhance ductility and thus facilitate formation of a bent portion.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,275,672 and 5,433,801, both to Althaus et al. disclose razor blade steel having high corrosion resistance, the disclosures of both are hereby incorporated in their entireties for reference. The Applicants of the present disclosure have discovered that materials having certain compositional similarities to the materials disclosed in the aforementioned Althaus et al. patents have unexpected additional utility for a razor blade having a bent portion when used in combination with a forming process including swivel bending, described later in the present disclosure.
Referring now to the drawings and in particular
As an alternative to the aforementioned, certain preliminary process steps can undertaken to manufacture a double-edge razor blade. Strip material having a suitable width (e.g. about 22 mm) is perforated in continuous strip form to provide apertures that can include an elongated center slot that can be used to support or locate the blade strip during subsequent processes such as edge forming and edge coating and location holes that can be used to index the strip or to locate a discrete razor blade during certain processes. Process steps (b) and (c) are performed as described above, with an exception that both the front edge and back edge are sharpened to provide cutting edges. The elongated strip is then separated into discrete double edge razor blades. Process step (d) is performed to both cutting edges as described above. The double edge razor blade is then split preferably adjacent the ends of the center slot to provide two single edge razor blades. Thereafter process step (f) is performed as described above.
Referring now to
The parti-cylindrical form 108 is sized to provide a bent portion 52 of the razor blade that preferably has an effective inside radius about 0.30 to about 0.35 mm. A larger inside radius (e.g. about 0.5 mm or more) is less preferred as a blade having a thickness 0.076 mm requires excessive overbending to yield a desired included angle, however a larger radius can have utility for thinner blades (e.g. less than 0.076 min thick). A smaller inside radius (e.g. smaller than about 0.15 mm) can result in a blade of thickness 0.076 mm fracturing in the vicinity of the bent portion and this phenomenon can be used to separate a removable portion 57 as depicted in
Referring now to
As depicted in
Referring now to
The outer surfaces of the bent portions of the razor blades of the material(s) and process(es) described above are substantially free from macro-cracks. In the context of the present disclosure a macro-crack is defined as a crack in the outer surface of the bend having a depth greater than ⅔ the thickness of the strip.
Referring now to
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. For instance, modifications or changes as can be made within the scope of the attached claims and features disclosed in connection with any one embodiment can be used alone or in combination with each feature of the respective other embodiments. Thus, the breadth and scope of any embodiment should not be limited by any of the above described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/047,708, filed Feb. 19, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/354,812, filed Jan. 20, 2012 which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/434,852, filed May 4, 2009, now abandoned, which claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/050,275 filed May 5, 2008, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein for reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3915757 | Engel | Oct 1975 | A |
3938250 | Perry | Feb 1976 | A |
4044463 | Tietjen | Aug 1977 | A |
4302876 | Emmett | Dec 1981 | A |
4352282 | Buske | Oct 1982 | A |
4391119 | Schmitz | Jul 1983 | A |
4551916 | Jacobson | Nov 1985 | A |
4603477 | Francis | Aug 1986 | A |
4621424 | Jacobson | Nov 1986 | A |
4782590 | Pope | Nov 1988 | A |
5007264 | Haack | Apr 1991 | A |
5010646 | Neamtu | Apr 1991 | A |
5199173 | Hegemann et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5239853 | Kutschker | Aug 1993 | A |
5259231 | Kutschker | Nov 1993 | A |
5275672 | Aithaus et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5305526 | Althaus | Apr 1994 | A |
5313706 | Motta et al. | May 1994 | A |
5369885 | Ferraro | Dec 1994 | A |
5416974 | Wain | May 1995 | A |
5433801 | Althaus et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5522137 | Andrews | Jun 1996 | A |
5551153 | Simms | Sep 1996 | A |
5823031 | Campbell | Oct 1998 | A |
5985459 | Kwiecien et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6161268 | Andrews | Dec 2000 | A |
6293020 | Julien | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295734 | Gilder et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6601303 | Gilder et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6619098 | Lisec | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6763593 | Nakatsu | Jul 2004 | B2 |
7024776 | Wain | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7100284 | King | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7213438 | Klinkhammer | May 2007 | B2 |
7730619 | Ozenick | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7827894 | Mincer | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8225510 | Peterson et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8316550 | Howells | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8322253 | Howells | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8327545 | Peterson | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20020144404 | Gilder et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030182602 | Vega et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20070124939 | Van Elbergen Santhagens | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070186424 | Becker et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070234576 | Masek et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070234577 | Masek et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080257004 | Spaeth | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090112200 | Eggers | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100107425 | Bykowski | May 2010 | A1 |
20110314678 | Peterson | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120132036 | Bykowski et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120311865 | Hamilton et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
688646 | Dec 1997 | CH |
3837603 | May 1990 | DE |
0077183 | Apr 1983 | EP |
0256974 | Jan 1993 | EP |
1810761 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1916498 | Oct 2007 | EP |
2553031 | Sep 1984 | FR |
2055069 | Jul 1980 | GB |
9910116 | Mar 1999 | WO |
2004112986 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2009137389 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Apr. 2007, for PCT/US2009/042678. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2009/042678. |
English Translastion of CH688646. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180257126 A1 | Sep 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61050275 | May 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12434852 | May 2009 | US |
Child | 13354812 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15047708 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 15980150 | US | |
Parent | 13354812 | Jan 2012 | US |
Child | 15047708 | US |