None
This invention relates to a method of making a contact lens with a secondary prism.
Contact lenses may be classified in various ways. If classified by number of optical powers they are usually divided into single vision and bifocal lenses. Single vision lenses may be comprised of spherical, aspherical and toric surfaces. Bifocal contact lenses are lenses with at least two regions of different optical powers, known as zones or segments. Usually, one power is chosen to provide the wearer with clear distance vision and the second power to provide clear near vision, but any two powers may be selected. Bifocal contact lenses also may be called multifocal contact lenses, although the latter term is sometimes reserved for lenses comprised of at least three regions with different optical powers or regions of variable power, as in U.S. Pat. No. 5,517,260 (Glady) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,754,270 (Rehse).
Bifocal contact lenses generally are classified into two types, concentric and vertically segmented. Both types can be produced as rigid or soft contact lenses. Concentric bifocal contact lenses have a central power zone surrounded by one or more annular zones of different powers or a sequence of alternating powers. Generally, the lens is designed so as to have little motion on the eye and the wearer views through portions of more than one zone at the same time, a process called simultaneous vision, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,636,049 (Blacker); U.S. Pat. No. 4,752,123 (Blacker); U.S. Pat. No. 4,869,587 (Breger); and U.S. Pat. No. 5,864,379 (Dunn). The distance and near zones, together with optional transition curves, comprise the bifocal area. The peripheral portion of the lens is comprised of one or more curves that are used to connect the bifocal area to the edge perimeter, including options currently in use such as prism ballast, slab-off, tapers, peripheral curves, lenticular curves, and truncations.
Vertically segmented bifocal contact lenses have vertically separated power zones, an upper zone that usually provides the appropriate correction for viewing far distances and a lower zone, which usually provides the appropriate correction for viewing near distances. The lenses are designed to alternate their position in front of the pupil when the lens moves up and down on the eye as the result of lid forces, which occur when the wearer changes gaze between different distances, a process called alternating vision, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,597,055 (Neefe) and U.S. Pat. No. 3,684,357 (Tsuetaki). If there is little vertical movement then vertically segmented bifocal contact lenses may also function as a simultaneous vision lens. The two vertically separated power zones maintain their relative positions by various features that can be added to control the lens position and stabilize the meridional rotation as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,095,878 (Fanti); U.S. Pat. No. 4,268,133 (Fischer); U.S. Pat. No. 5,760,870 (Payor); U.S. Pat. No. 5,296,880 (Webb); and U.S. Pat. No. 4,573,775 (Bayshore). This is commonly accomplished in rigid bifocal contact lenses by incorporating a prism into the lens, which provides a progressively greater thickness from the top to the bottom of the lens. The prism serves to maintain the desired lens orientation and keep the lower zone of the lens downward on the eye as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,430,504 (Muckenhirn) and U.S. Pat. No. 4,854,089 (Morales) and in Burris, 1993; Bierly, 1995, and Conklin Jr. et al, 1992. The lower edge of the lens is designed to rest upon the lower lid margin of the wearer and the lens shifts up and down relative to the eye as the result of lid forces. There are several subtypes of vertically segmented bifocal contact lenses, based on the shape of the near zone, including round, D-shaped, flat, crescent, and others as described by Conklin Jr. et al, 1992 and in U.S. Pat. No. 4,618,229 (Jacobstein) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,074,082 (Cappelli).
There have been attempts to incorporate prism into soft bifocal contact lenses for the same functional purpose as prism provides for rigid lenses. U.S. Pat. No. 4,549,794 (Loshaek); U.S. Pat. No. 5,635,998 (Baugh); U.S. Pat. No. 4,618,229 (Jacobstein) Ezekiel, 2002, but generally these lenses have inadequate lens movement or produce discomfort to the wearer. There also have been attempts to induce a vertical shift of a soft bifocal contact lens by adding features to the lower periphery of the lens, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,614,413 (Obssuth); U.S. Pat. No. 5,635,998 (Baugh); U.S. Pat. No. 6,109,749 (Bernstein): U.S. Pat. No. 5,912,719; and European Pat. EP0042023 (Muller).
U.S. Pat. No. 6,746,118 to Mandell describes a contact lens comprising a secondary prism that controls vertical lens movement on the eye of a wearer. The anterior surface of the lens has a central optical portion, which in one embodiment contains a bifocal design comprising a distance zone located above a near zone. The secondary prism has a base that extends forward from the lower region of the anterior surface of the lens. When the lens is worn, the base is in apposition or near apposition to the lower lid so that as the wearer looks downward the lid holds the lens in place, which produces an upward movement of the lens relative to the eye. This allows the wearer to view through the lower part of the central optical portion, which contains the optical power for near vision.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,746,118 to Mandell also describes a method for manufacturing a contact lens with secondary prism, which involves a process whereby a lens button, consisting of a cylinder of contact lens material, is machined in a series of steps using an optical lathe. In machining the front surface the first step is to form the button into a shape resembling the top of a hat. Next, the peripheral portion of the hat is shaped to form in part a primary prism and then the central portion of the hat is shaped to form in part a secondary prism and the power zone(s). Various other lens features are added for design enhancements.
In brief terms, the manufacturing method of the present contact lens starts with a button of contact lens material having a posterior surface of suitable design for fitting the needs of the eye, and forms the front surface of the lens by:
We have developed an improved method for manufacturing a contact lens with secondary prism that conforms to the design principles described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,746,118 to Mandell but which avoids the need for the step of forming a hat shape to the button. The elimination of this step speeds the manufacturing process and decreases the cost of production.
The present contact lens has the advantage that, regardless of whether a manual lathe or a computer-controlled lathe is used, fewer steps are required for lens production. A manual lathe may be used when lower cost of production is desired or a computer-controlled lathe is not available. A computer-controlled lathe may be used when production speed and versatility are desired, or for complex bifocal lenses and other advanced lens designs.
It is an object of this invention to provide a method of manufacturing a contact lens with secondary prism that eliminates the step of constructing a hat shape to a button of contact lens material before lathe cutting the parts of the front surface of the contact lens.
It is a further object of this invention to reduce the time and cost that is required in using either a manual or computer-controlled lathe for manufacturing a contact lens with secondary prism.
In each embodiment of the current invention that follows, the posterior surface of the lens is formed first by lathe cutting or molding using standard methods available in the contact lens industry (DAC. Manual of 3x lathe Operation). The posterior surface may be spherical, aspherical, toric, with or without peripheral curves, and may contain one or more powers in the form of a bifocal or multifocal.
Prism angle 62 is determined by the formula:
a=d/(n−1) Formula 1.1
where:
Formula 1.1, strickly speaking, applies only to optically thin prisms, which is not usually the case for contact lenses, but is adequate to illustrate the principles presented here. In addition, for this application, formula 1.1 applies only to position 63. Prism power above or below position 63 will vary according to the slope difference between front surface 49 and back surface 55. Prism angle 62 and a radius 67 of front surface 49 are sufficient information to find the coordinates for a center of curvature 68 for front surface 49. Using position 63 as the origin it is found that:
x=radius 67(cosin A)
and
y=−radius 67(sin A)
Lathe 60 is equipped with a cutting tool 69 having a center of rotation 70 as shown in
Secondary prism 52 is lathed indirectly, by cutting away a section 76 from button 54 using lenticular radius 75, as shown in
Secondary prism 52 is formed by making a series of lathe cuts 72 of lenticular radius 75, from button side 56 inward to base 77, which proceed in steps from base front point 79 to control point 81, as shown in
There is a single lenticular radius, 75a which has the unique property of producing a lens with equal edge thickness for the entire length of an edge perimeter 91. Radius 75a has a center of curvature 85a, which occurs where radius line 84 intersects back surface axis 65. Radius 75a has a length equal to the distance from center of curvature 85a to control point 81. A locus of points 86a, generated by the tip of radius 75a will pass through both a top edge 73 and lower edge 83 of lens 45, as well as control point 81, as shown in
In another embodiment of the present contact lens, a lenticular radius 75b is made longer then unique radius 75a so that a center of curvature 85b falls away from axis 65. A highest point 97 of lenticular section 76 on each side of lens 45 will occur below top edge 73, as shown in
In
As is known from the principles of geometry, the locus of points representing the intersection of two spheres with centers of curvature that are not coincident is a circle. When the circle is projected onto a plane containing both centers of curvature it is seen as a straight line that passes through a point where the spheres are seen to intersect and is perpendicular to a line connecting the two centers of curvature. In
From the principles of analytic geometry, the locus of points representing the intersection of a cylinder and sphere is an ellipse when viewed in front and a parabola when viewed from the side. In
Point 97 is common to the intersection of the straight line 94, lenticular 76, and parabolic arc 95. The locus of points where lenticular 76 intersects lens perimeter 46 is represented by a curved line 98, the portion of parabolic arc 95 connecting point 97 and lower edge perimeter 91. Point 97 is the point on each side of the lenticular perimeter that is highest for lens 49.
To find the vertical distance between point 97 and the lower edge of construction cylinder 92 the following equations for parabola 95 and line 94 are first given. Designating the radius of curvature of the front surface 67 by the symbol rf, the radius of curvature of lenticular 75b by the symbol rs, the vertical distance from center of curvature 68 to line 65 by the symbol yf, the horizontal distance from the line connecting point 83 and point 73 to center of curvature 68 by the symbol xf, the vertical distance from 85b to line 65 by the symbol ys and the horizontal distance from the line connecting 83 and 73 to center of curvature 85b by the symbol xs, the equation for line 94 is;
By designating the groups of constants
The equation for line 94 simplifies to
x=a+by (1)
Using the same symbols for the radius of curvature of the lenticular 75b and the coordinates of its center of curvature 85b and designating the diameter of the of the lens 47 by the symbol Φ, the equation for parabola 95 representing the intersection of lenticular 76 and the edge of lens 49 is
x2−(2xs)x−(2ys)y+(xs2+ys2−rs2+Φ2/4)=0
Designating the constant groups as
The equation for parabola 95 simplifies to
x2+cx+dy+e=0 (2)
When the expression for x given in equation (1) is substituted for x in equation (2) a solution for the y value of intersection point 97 is found to be
The vertical distance from the lower edge of construction cylinder 92 to 97 is then
Φ/2+y
A secondary prism power, P2, may be found from the difference in slopes of front surface 49 at axis 65 and back surface 88 of secondary prism 52 at axis 65. The difference in slopes equals a secondary prism angle and the power of secondary prism P2 may be found from Formula 1.1.
Although, it is convenient and common for illustration purposes to show a cutting end 106 of cutting tool 69 as a point, it is recognized by those skilled in the art that cutting end 106 in application must have a finite radius 107. The shape and radius 107 of cutting end 106 will have an influence on the shape and radius 108 of secondary prism base 77, along with the manner in which it is cut. Cutting end 106 may be round as in
If height 78 and depth 80 of secondary prism base 77 are each equal to radius 107 of cutting end 106, and cutting end 106 is spherical, the same spherical shape with radius 107 will be cut as a secondary prism base radius 108, shown in cross section as
If depth 80 of secondary prism base 77 is larger than radius 107 of cutting end 106, it is necessary to impart forward motion to cutting tool 69 in addition to the inward motion during the cutting process for lenticular 76, as shown in
If, for a given set of lens parameters, cutting end 106 of cutting tool 69 has a very small cutting end radius 107, or the height of lenticular segment 113 is large, there must be a significant movement of cutting tool 69 towards control point 81 before it changes direction towards front point 79. Conversely, if cutting end 106 has a large end radius 107, it will require less inward movement. The cutting end radius 107 may be smaller than radius of central segment 114 but cannot be larger. The length of the final segment 115 will depend upon the arithmetic difference between base depth 80 and cutting end radius 107. The final segment 115 need not be parallel to the axis of back surface 65, as in the previous example, but may deviate at an angle to it and still be tangent to cutting end 106 so as to make a smooth transition.
It is not necessary that lenticular segment 113 be formed by moving cutting end 106 along locus of points 86 in a circular path. Cutting end 106 may follow any path chosen by the lens designer, providing that the inward movement for lenticular segment 113 terminates at the start of central segment 114. Hence, lenticular segment 113 may follow a course that ranges from a tilted straight line to various aspheric curves, as shown in
In order to cut lenticular 53 and secondary prism base 77 a difference is needed between a path 117 of cutting edge 106 and an actual path 118 of cutting tool 69, defined by the motion of the tool center of curvature 119. This difference in motion is known as tool compensation, which requires an exact knowledge of the shape of cutting end 106 and its center of curvature 119. For example, in
The surface of the base 77 may contain ridges 120, furrows or other irregularities to further enhance friction between the lens and the lid as shown in
In another embodiment of the present contact lens, a contact lens, 45a has two lenticular curves, which provide a means to control lens thickness in addition to forming secondary prism 52. As shown in
Contact lens 45a may be lathed by the method of first cutting front surface 49 comprising optical portion 122 and first lenticular curve 121 in a single pass, together with initial prism 61. Next, base of secondary prism 52 is cut into a portion of first lenticular portion 121, to produce a second lenticular 125, as in
The optical portion of the lens may contain a single vision or bifocal design. It may also comprise a spherical, toric or aspheric construction. Complex designs will require a computer-controlled lathe.
The fact that the tip of the cutting tool has a finite radius allows the design of a secondary prism base that is compatible with its functional requirements. A base shape is needed that will allow the lower lid to exert force on the base to hold the lens in place but at the same time not be so blunt as to create discomfort. If the need is for a single vision lens that requires minimal movement to create tear exchange or to avoid lens sticking then a narrow base of large radius may suffice. If the need is for a bifocal lens that requires maximum movement for vision, then a wide base of small radius may be required.
In addition to controlling lens movement the secondary prism base may be used to stabilize the lens position during distance vision, both vertically and rotationally. This would have application for lenses designed to correct the aberrations of the eye.
The lens design principles presented would apply either to a lens with zero edge thickness or finite edge thickness by adding a constant to zero edge thickness.
The lens design principles presented can be applied to either hard or soft contact lenses.
As an alternate means of production, the front surface of a contact lens can be formed first and the back surface formed afterwards.
Prism in a contact lens may be produced by offsetting or tilting the lens button. If the back surface is produced by offsetting the center of curvature an appropriate amount then the front surface may be cut with no offset.
The base of a prism is the point or region of greatest thickness and depends on the shape of the prism. As seen from the front in orthogonal projection, if the prism is round the base will appear as a point and if the prism is square the base will appears as one side.
It should be noted that different shapes to secondary prism base may be needed for differences purposes. For bifocal lenses, where maximum contact with the lower lid is required, the base shape may be more abrupt. For single vision lenses, where the goal is to produce some lens movement for tear circulation or to avoid lens sticking, the base shape might have a more gradual slope in order to maximize the lens comfort. A lens can be made a minimum thickness when it is desired to have minimum movement, as in correcting the aberrations of the eye. The minimum thickness can be achieved by using a lenticular design with minimum junction thickness
The lens can be made greater than the minimum thickiness when it is desired to initiate movement for tear exchange beneath the contact lens.
In an alternate method for a concentric bifocal construction, a toric curve or aspheric curve may be placed on the back surface.
The methods described here may be used to form molds that in turn may be used to form contact lenses.
This invention was made with government support under grant 1-R43 EY14286-02, awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.