1. Field of the Invention
This invention is in the general field of load-bearing structures and, more particularly, is a load bearing structure made from an expanded polystyrene core that is chemically combined with high impact polystyrene.
2. Description of the Prior Art
A shipping pallet is a well known load-bearing, moveable platform whereon articles are placed for shipment. The pallet usually is loaded with a multiplicity of items, such as cartons or boxes. The loaded pallet is movable with either a pallet truck or a forklift
There is a nine billion dollar market for pallets in the United States. There is a thirty billion dollar world wide market. Approximately ninety percent of these markets is for pallets made from wood.
The weight of the wood pallet is in a range of forty to seventy pounds. Therefore, the weight of a cargo shipped on the wood pallet is reduced by from forty to seventy pounds to provide for the weight of the wood pallet.
It should be understood that injuries caused by wood splinters and nails are frequent occurrences among people who handle the wood pallet. Additionally, disposal of the wood pallet at the end of its useful life is a threat to the environment.
There has been concern among nations about the use of the wood pallet causing an import of wood-boring insects, including the Asian Longhorned Beetle, the Asian Cerambycid Beetle, the Pine Wood Nematode, the Pine Wilt Nematode and the Anoplophora Glapripwnnis. Exemplary of damage caused by imported insects is the fate of the Chestnut Tree in the United States. There was a time when it was said that a squirrel could cross the United States on Chestnut Tree limbs without ever touching the ground. Insect infestation has caused the extinction of the Chestnut Tree in the United States.
Therefore, the wood pallet's weight, the injuries that it causes, its threat to the environment and the possibility of it causing an importation of wood-boring insects militates against the use of the wood pallet. As explained hereinafter, there is an attractive alternative to the wood pallet.
An object of the invention is an easily movable load bearing structure that is not likely to carry wood-boring insects.
Another object of the invention is a movable load bearing structure that does not have splinters and nails that may cause injury.
According to the present invention, a dunnage platform has an expanded polystyrene core with a region proximal to its surface that is chemically combined with a high impact polystyrene.
Because of a chemical combination of components, comparing the core before the chemical combination to the dunnage platform that is formed, there is an increase in strength to weight ratio of as much as 1000:1 that allows the dunnage platform to carry loads comparable to loads carried by a wooden pallet. The dunnage platform does not support insect life and does not have splinters and nails that cause injury.
Other objects, features and advantages of the invention should be apparent from the following description of a preferred embodiment thereof as illustrated in the accompanying drawing.
As shown in
The edge 12 is proximal to ma spaces 42, 44, 46, 48 on the bottom side 18. The marginal spaces 42, 44, 46, 48 separate the legs 26-28, the legs 20, 2326, the legs 20-22 and the legs 22, 25, 28, respectively, from the edge 12.
Because the core 10 is made from expanded polystyrene, it does not have sufficient structural strength to be useable as a load bearing platform. A dunnage platform with sufficient strength is formed by chemically combining a region of the core 10, proximal to its surface, with a high impact polystyrene. Expanded polystyrene and high impact polystyrene are well known. The dunnage platform described hereinafter has substantially the same dimensions as the core 10.
A first of two parts of a chemical combination process causes portions of the expanded polystyrene proximal to the bottom side 18 to be chemically combined with the high impact polystyrene to form strengthened polystyrene. Additionally, a portion of the expanded polystyrene that is proximal to the edge 12 and in a proximal relationship to the bottom side 18 is chemically combined with the high impact polystyrene to form the strengthened polystyrene.
As shown in
An interior of the walls 52-55 form a shelf 60 that extends around the interior 56. The shelf 60 has a surface 62 that is parallel to the surface 58. For reason's explained hereinafter, a displacement between the surfaces 58, 62 is less than one half of the width 14 (
As shown in
A fixedly positioned clamping frame 64 has a first high impact polystyrene sheet 67 clamped therein. A heater 68 is positioned proximal to the frame 64.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
It should be understood that when the sheet 67 is heated, it becomes fragile. Because the frame 64 is fixedly positioned, a risk of damage to the sheet 67 is minimized.
As shown in
It should be understood that the core 10 is porous. When the vacuum pump 84 operates, air may pass through the core 10, from the top side 16, to the pump 84. The heated sheet 67 is not porous, thereby causing one atmosphere of air pressure that draws the heated sheet 67 onto the bottom side 18 and the two thirds of the edge 12 that extends from the mold 50.
The expanded polystyrene proximal to the bottom side 18 and proximal to the two thirds of the edge 12 that extend above the mold 50 chemically combine with the high impact polystyrene of the sheet 67 to form the strengthened polystyrene. The strengthened polystyrene is not porous. The side 18 and the legs 20-28 with the strengthened polystyrene proximal to their surface are hereinafter referred to as a side 18C with legs 20C-28C, respectively.
As shown in
As shown in
The frame 64 frames a second high impact polystyrene sheet 94, similar to the sheet 67. The frame 64 with the sheet 94 is fixedly positioned above the mold 50. The heater 68 is positioned proximal to the fame 64.
As shown in
As shown in
In accordance with the second part of the process, the expanded polystyrene proximal to the portions of the surface of core 10 that extends from the mold 50 chemically combines with the high impact polystyrene of the sheet 94 to form the strengthened polystyrene. Moreover, because the displacement between the surfaces 58, 62 is less than one half of the width 14, the strengthened polystyrene is formed proximal to the entire edge 12.
The dunnage platform formed by the process weighs approximately eight pounds and can carry an approximately 3500 pound load.
As shown in
Similarly, the legs 20C, 23C, 26C, and the legs 21C, 24C, 27C and the legs 22C, 25C, 28C are arranged in parallel rows 98-100, respectively, that are orthogonal to the columns 95-97. The rows 98-100 are spaced so that tines of a fork lift can fit between the rows 98, 99 and between the rows 99, 100. Accordingly, with the tines parallel to the columns 98-100, the fork lift can lift the dunnage platform from either of two sides.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/617,578, filed Dec. 28, 2006, and which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,544,262 on Jun. 9, 2009, which application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/490,372, filed Jul. 20, 2006, and which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,611,596 on Nov. 3, 2009, which application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/921,903, filed Aug. 20, 2004, and which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,128,797 on Oct. 31, 2006, which application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/166,988, filed Jun. 11, 2002, and which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,786,992 on Sep. 7, 2004. The above applications and patents are herein expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3511191 | Barry et al. | May 1970 | A |
3581681 | Newton | Jun 1971 | A |
3654012 | Schlager | Apr 1972 | A |
3903023 | Boutillier | Sep 1975 | A |
4397246 | Ishida | Aug 1983 | A |
4661302 | Park | Apr 1987 | A |
4705811 | Park | Nov 1987 | A |
4734441 | Park | Mar 1988 | A |
4796540 | Pelfrey | Jan 1989 | A |
5098498 | Hale | Mar 1992 | A |
5156094 | Johansson | Oct 1992 | A |
5266396 | Howard | Nov 1993 | A |
5362436 | Wagner | Nov 1994 | A |
5369135 | Cambell | Nov 1994 | A |
5401456 | Alesi, Jr. | Mar 1995 | A |
5417167 | Sadr | May 1995 | A |
5525636 | Henn | Jun 1996 | A |
5544568 | Potgieter | Aug 1996 | A |
5555980 | Johnston | Sep 1996 | A |
5598675 | Pruss | Feb 1997 | A |
5601912 | Ellingson | Feb 1997 | A |
5685644 | Taylor | Nov 1997 | A |
5833796 | Matich | Nov 1998 | A |
6021916 | Stolzman | Feb 2000 | A |
6029583 | LeTrudet | Feb 2000 | A |
6076693 | Reiter | Jun 2000 | A |
6123032 | Ohanesian | Sep 2000 | A |
6191228 | Nosker | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6224706 | Matich | May 2001 | B1 |
6294114 | Muirhead | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6380294 | Babinec | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395791 | Chaudhary | May 2002 | B1 |
6431372 | Aoyama | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446563 | Ohanesian | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458232 | Valentinsson | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6622642 | Ohanesian | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6659020 | Ball | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6745703 | Torrey | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6748876 | Preisler | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6786992 | Dummett | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6824860 | Edwards | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6941877 | Dickner | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6943678 | Muirhead | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955129 | Moore | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6976436 | Sugihara | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6984695 | Brown | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7025208 | Baker | Apr 2006 | B2 |
D521208 | France | May 2006 | S |
7044066 | Miller | May 2006 | B1 |
7128797 | Dummett | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7544262 | Dummett | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7611596 | Dummett | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20020015811 | Gusavage | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20040112907 | Donnelly | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050108988 | Dickner | May 2005 | A1 |
20050263044 | Bearse | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050274296 | Dickner | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060090844 | Dummett | May 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
404185 | Jun 1966 | CH |
2045712 | Mar 1972 | DE |
8429708.5 | Feb 1985 | DE |
0 422 542 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0 480 451 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0 520 508 | Jun 1992 | EP |
1 500 599 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1308036 | Feb 1973 | GB |
9523682 | Sep 1995 | WO |
0238471 | May 2002 | WO |
03099668 | Dec 2003 | WO |
03099676 | Dec 2003 | WO |
03099689 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004026713 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2005105590 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2005105599 | Nov 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090218715 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10166988 | Jun 2002 | US |
Child | 10921903 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11617578 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 12464283 | US | |
Parent | 11490372 | Jul 2006 | US |
Child | 11617578 | US | |
Parent | 10921903 | Aug 2004 | US |
Child | 11490372 | US |