Method of making a metal to metal antifuse

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6001693
  • Patent Number
    6,001,693
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 1, 1995
    29 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 14, 1999
    25 years ago
Abstract
The antifuse structure of the present invention includes a bottom planarized electrode, an ILD disposed over the bottom electrode, an antifuse cell opening in and through the ILD exposing the bottom electrode, a first barrier metal layer disposed in the antifuse cell opening to protect the antifuse material layer from diffusion from the bottom electrode and to form an effective bottom electrode of reduced area, hence reducing the capacitance of the device, an antifuse material layer disposed in the antifuse cell opening and over the first barrier metal layer, a second barrier metal layer disposed over the antifuse material layer, and a top electrode disposed over the second barrier metal layer.
Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed to a metal-to-metal antifuse structure for use in microcircuit structures such as Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) and the like. More particularly, the antifuse structure of the present invention comprises an antifuse cell opening in which is deposited a barrier metal over which is deposited the antifuse material layer and then another barrier metal layer. In this way the capacitance of the antifuse is reduced resulting in a device compatible with higher operating speeds.
2. The Prior Art
Prior art metal-to-metal antifuse structures generally comprise a planar bottom electrode on top of which is disposed a planar barrier metal layer. An interlayer dielectric layer (ILD) is disposed over the bottom electrode structure and an antifuse cell opening is formed in the ILD to expose the bottom electrode. An antifuse material layer may then be deposited in the antifuse cell opening (or "via") and appropriate layers deposited over the antifuse material layer. The problem with this approach is that it requires a thicker barrier layer on top of the bottom electrode which is not a standard process in CMOS backend technology. For manufacturability, it is desirable to have antifuse related processes impose as little change as possible on the process technology.
OBJECTS AND ADVANTAGES OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a metal-to-metal antifuse structure maximizing the use of standard process steps and therefore resulting in increased manufacturability.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a metal-to-metal antifuse having a better step coverage for the top electrode disposed within the antifuse cell opening.
These and many other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from a consideration of the drawings and ensuing description of the invention.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The antifuse structure of the present invention includes a bottom planarized electrode, an ILD disposed over the bottom electrode, an antifuse cell opening in and through the ILD exposing the bottom electrode, a first barrier metal layer disposed in the antifuse cell opening to protect the antifuse material layer from diffusion from the bottom electrode and to form an effective bottom electrode of reduced area, hence reducing the capacitance of the device, an antifuse material layer disposed in the antifuse cell opening and over the first barrier metal layer, a second barrier metal layer disposed over the antifuse material layer, and a top electrode disposed over the second barrier metal layer.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIGS. 1-8 are diagrams showing progressive stages of construction of the metal-to-metal antifuse structure according to the present invention.
FIG. 9 is a diagram showing the completed metal-to-metal antifuse structure according to the present invention.
FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an alternative embodiment of the completed metal-to-metal antifuse structure according to the present invention.
FIG. 11 is a diagram showing an alternative embodiment of the completed metal-to-metal antifuse structure according to the present invention.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Those of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the following description of the present invention is illustrative only and is not intended to be in any way limiting. Other embodiments of the invention will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons from an examination of the within disclosure.
The present invention is directed to an improved metal-to-metal antifuse structure which maximizes the use of standard CMOS process flow.
Turning to the drawings, FIG. 1 depicts a substrate 10 on which has been formed a bottom electrode 12 which will form the bottom antifuse electrode. The substrate may be any insulating portion of a microcircuit or semiconductor structure. Bottom electrode 12 is preferably aluminum of thickness in the range of 3000 .ANG.-10000 .ANG. with 5000 .ANG. presently preferred. Bottom electrode 12 can also be any standard metallization compatible with standard CMOS processes. As shown in FIG. 2, over bottom electrode 12 is formed an interlayer dielectric layer (ILD) 14 preferably of oxide of thickness in the range of 3000 .ANG.-10000 .ANG. with 4000 .ANG. presently preferred. Antifuse cell opening 16 is opened using conventional etching techniques through ILD 14 to expose bottom electrode 12 as shown. As shown in FIG. 3, a first barrier metal layer 18 is formed by a blanket deposit of a barrier metal material such as tungsten (W), titanium-tungsten (TiW), titanium-tungsten nitride (TiWN), titanium nitride (TiN), titanium (Ti), tungsten silicide (WSix), and combinations of the foregoing. Preferably barrier metal layer 18 is formed of TiN of thickness in the range of 1000 .ANG.-3000 .ANG. with 2000 .ANG. presently preferred.
As shown in FIG. 4, a photoresist layer 20 of thickness in the range of 0.4-0.7 .mu.m is spun on and then uniformly etched back to yield the structure of FIG. 5. Then the resist 20 remaining (FIG. 5) is stripped using conventional resist stripping techniques to yield the result shown in FIG. 6--a cup-shaped barrier metal layer 18 (Via 16 is preferably round when looking down on it).
Next, antifuse material layer 22 is deposited over first barrier metal layer 18. Antifuse material layer 22 is preferably formed of a conventional nitride-amorphous silicon-nitride sandwich where the first (lower) nitride layer is preferably of thickness in the range of 70 .ANG.-200 .ANG. with 100 .ANG. presently preferred; the amorphous silicon layer is preferably of thickness in the range of 300 .ANG.-1000 .ANG. with 500 .ANG. presently preferred; and the second (upper) nitride layer is preferably of thickness in the range of 70 .ANG.-200 .ANG. with 100 .ANG. presently preferred. Over antifuse material layer 22 is preferably deposited second barrier metal layer 24 which is preferably formed by a blanket deposit of a barrier metal material such as W, TiW, TiWN, TiN, Ti, WSix, and combinations of the foregoing. Preferably second barrier metal layer 24 is formed of TiN of thickness in the range of 1000 .ANG.-3000 .ANG. with 2000 .ANG. presently preferred.
Next, as shown in FIG. 8, the antifuse cell is patterned and finally, as shown in FIG. 9, top electrode metallization layer 26 is formed over second barrier layer 24.
The benefits of this novel structure include its full compatibility with existing standard CMOS processes and particularly its compatibility with the standard CMOS metallization. Fuse capacitance is significantly reduced by the relatively smaller size of the first barrier metal layer versus the much larger size of the bottom electrode. Further control of the capacitance of the fuse is available by controlling the height of the sleeve 28 (FIG. 9). A shorter sleeve will give a lower fuse capacitance. Better step coverage is possible through the improved conformality for the antifuse material layer provided by the structure because the effective antifuse via depth is shallower due to the presence of the first barrier metal layer 18 within antifuse cell opening 16. Finally, a wide choice of barrier metals are available since the structure described imposes less restriction on the choice of a barrier material.
According to an alternative embodiment of the present invention depicted in FIG. 10, spacers 32, 34, 36 and 38 may be added to further reduce corner effects and spacers 40, 42 reduce side diffusion associated with the top electrode 26. The spacers may be fabricated of silicon oxide, silicon nitride or amorphous silicon as is known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
Spacers 32, 34, 36 and 38 reduce the capacitance of the antifuse cell because they reduce the exposed area of bottom electrode 18. The spacer etch used for forming the spacer also serves the purpose of rounding corners 44, 46 of bottom electrode 18 as shown in FIG. 10 thus reducing the probability of antifuse defects resulting from sharp corners in the bottom electrode 18 at corners 44, 46.
While illustrative embodiments and applications of this invention have been shown and described, it would be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications than have been mentioned above are possible without departing from the inventive concepts set forth herein. The invention, therefore, is not to be limited except in the spirit of the appended claims.
Claims
  • 1. A process for fabricating a metal-to-metal antifuse comprising the following steps:
  • (a) forming a bottom electrode having an upper surface over an insulating portion of a microcircuit structure;
  • (b) forming an interlayer dielectric layer over said bottom electrode;
  • (c) etching an antifuse cell opening in and through said interlayer dielectric layer so as to expose a portion of said upper surface of said bottom electrode;
  • (d) blanket depositing a first barrier metal layer over said interlayer dielectric layer and in said antifuse cell opening and over and in physical and electrical contact with said bottom electrode;
  • (e) spin depositing a layer of photoresist over said first barrier metal layer;
  • (f) etching back said photoresist and said first barrier metal layer so as to leave only a cup-shaped portion of said first barrier metal layer disposed in said antifuse cell opening;
  • (g) stripping the remaining photoresist from within said cup-shaped portion;
  • (h) depositing an antifuse material layer over and in said cup-shaped portion and over said interlayer dielectric layer;
  • (i) depositing a second barrier metal layer over said antifuse material layer;
  • (j) patterning and etching said antifuse material layer and said second barrier metal layer; and
  • (k) forming a top electrode over said second barrier metal layer.
  • 2. A process for fabricating a metal-to-metal antifuse according to claim 1 further including the following step which takes place between step (j) and step (k):
  • (l) forming a spacer of an insulating material adjacent edges formed by step (j) in said antifuse material layer and said second barrier metal layer.
  • 3. A process for fabricating a metal-to-metal antifuse according to claim 1 further including the following step which takes place between step (g) and step (h):
  • (l) forming spacers of an insulating material in internal corners formed in said cup-shaped portion and between said cup-shaped portion and said antifuse cell opening.
  • 4. A process for fabricating a metal-to-metal antifuse according to claim 2 further including the following step which takes place between step (g) and step (h):
  • (m) forming spacers of an insulating material in internal corners formed in said cup-shaped portion and between said cup-shaped portion and said antifuse cell opening.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This is a divisional of patent application Ser. No. 08/319,170, filed Oct. 6, 1994, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,541,441.

US Referenced Citations (50)
Number Name Date Kind
4651409 Ellsworth et al. Mar 1987
4748490 Hollingsworth May 1988
4751197 Wills Jun 1988
4796075 Whitten Jan 1989
4822753 Pintchovski et al. Apr 1989
4847732 Stopper et al. Jul 1989
4870302 Freeman Sep 1989
4899205 Hamdy et al. Feb 1990
4912066 Wills Mar 1990
4914055 Gordon et al. Apr 1990
4933576 Tamamura et al. Jun 1990
4943538 Mohsen et al. Jul 1990
5070384 McCollum et al. Dec 1991
5093711 Hirakawa Mar 1992
5095362 Roesner Mar 1992
5100827 Lytle Mar 1992
5120679 Boardman et al. Jun 1992
5134457 Hamdy et al. Jul 1992
5166556 Hsu et al. Nov 1992
5171715 Husher et al. Dec 1992
5191550 Kubota Mar 1993
5194759 El-Ayat et al. Mar 1993
5196724 Gordon et al. Mar 1993
5219982 Bujisingh et al. Jun 1993
5233206 Lee et al. Aug 1993
5233217 Dixit et al. Aug 1993
5241496 Lowrey et al. Aug 1993
5242851 Choi Sep 1993
5248632 Tung et al. Sep 1993
5250459 Lee Oct 1993
5266829 Hamdy et al. Nov 1993
5270251 Cohen Dec 1993
5272101 Forouhi et al. Dec 1993
5272666 Tsang et al. Dec 1993
5284788 Spratt et al. Feb 1994
5286993 Lowrey et al. Feb 1994
5290734 Boardman et al. Mar 1994
5293133 Birkner et al. Mar 1994
5298784 Gambino et al. Mar 1994
5300456 Tigelaar et al. Apr 1994
5302546 Gordon et al. Apr 1994
5308795 Hawley et al. May 1994
5322812 Dixit et al. Jun 1994
5327024 Cox Jul 1994
5328865 Boardman et al. Jul 1994
5329153 Dixit Jul 1994
5341267 Whitten et al. Aug 1994
5353246 Tsang et al. Oct 1994
5404029 Husher et al. Apr 1995
5412593 Magel et al. May 1995
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
0 455 414 Nov 1991 EPX
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 319170 Oct 1994