Method of making an asphalt composition containing ester bottoms

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • RE50456
  • Patent Number
    RE50,456
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, January 25, 2023
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 10, 2025
    2 days ago
Abstract
This invention involves the addition of ester bottoms to an asphalt paving composition to improve the usable temperature range (UTR). The ester bottoms are a byproduct of refining a feedstock containing all or a portion of vegetable oil or animal fat.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to asphalt compositions and the process for the improvement of their properties. The invention further relates to a modified asphalt composition useful for a variety of applications, particularly paving asphalt and for construction materials utilizing such compositions.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to an asphalt paving composition made with ester bottoms. The Environmental Protection Agency provides a discussion of asphalt roads at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/cho4/final/c4s05.pdf which is incorporated herein by reference.


Ester bottoms are a low value by-product of vegetable oil or animal fat refining to produce methyl ester. There is little known value for ester bottoms and they are currently marketed for animal feed, lubricants, or other industrial uses at a low price point.


Asphalt materials are used in a wide variety of applications including but not limited to paving asphalt and asphalt shingles. Paving asphalt must be sufficiently durable to withstand high and low temperature extremes without undue wear, cracking or melting. Paving asphalt hardens while in service (age hardening). Age hardening is caused by an increase in viscosity of the asphalt mixture and the gradual loss of flexibility. The degree and the rate of the hardening of the paving asphalt composition or cement are factors affecting the durability of an applied surface. It is believed that the reaction of the asphalt composition with atmospheric oxygen is the principle cause of asphalt hardening in pavement. Therefore, the asphalt industry has long sought to reduce age hardening.


Some conventional refined asphalts have been found to be incapable of reacting some requirements for resistance to either low temperature thermal cracking or high temperature rutting resistance in certain climates. Modifiers such as elastomers, plasterers, chemical gellants, and chemical modifiers can be effective in improving either, or sometimes both, low temperature thermal cracking or high temperature rutting resistance. These modifiers have varying levels of effectiveness and cost.


Conventional practice to improve low temperature properties adds softer asphaltic compounds, aromatic oils, or other additives to soften or plasticize the asphalt composition. In order to reach acceptable low temperature properties, excessive amounts of soft asphaltic materials or fluxes may be required


In addition, aromatic oils used in combination with polymers can improve the rutting resistance of asphalt. However, many times, the level of polymer required to reach the desired level of rutting resistance becomes undesirable as a result of excessive cost, rendering the composition not feasible for use as a paving composition.


Asphalt compositions may be derived, as indicated from any well-known bituminous or asphaltic substance obtained from natural sources or derived from a number of sources such as, shale oil, coal tar, and the like as well as the mixtures of two or more of such materials. As indicated, paving grade asphalt compositions are preferred in the present invention. Such paving asphalt compositions are often referred to as viscosity, penetration graded, or performance graded (PG) asphalts having penetration up to 400 as measured by ASTM method D5.


As a result of the 1987 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), a $150 million research study was commissioned in which $50 million was spent towards asphalt research for improving asphalt pavements. As a product of that research which was concluded in 1992, the Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP) produced what is now known as the Superpave Performance Graded Binder Specification in which asphaltic binders are graded or characterized according to their relative performance in resistance to rutting, shoving or deformation at high temperatures, fatigue at intermediate temperatures, and thermal cracking resistance at low temperatures. Asphalts which normally would be graded either under the penetration or viscosity specifications are now graded as PG (Performance Graded) binders. As such, their designation will be representative of their resistance at both high and low temperature, indicating their useable temperature range (UTR) as a PG AA-BB where AA=high temperature resistance in degrees Celsius and BB is low temperature cracking resistance in minus degrees Celsius, i.e., PG 64-22 would prevent rutting up to 64° C. (147° F.) and low temperature cracking to a minus 22° C. (−72° F.). Preferred asphalts are the performance graded asphalts such as PG 46-40; PG 48-34; PG 46-28, PG 52-40; PG 52-34; PG 52-28; PG 52-22, PG 58-40, PG 58-34, PG 58-28, PG PG 58-22, PG 64-40, PG 64-34, PG64-28, PG 64-22, PG 70-40, PG 70-34, PG 70-28, PG 70-22, PG 76-40, PG 76-34, PG 76-28, PG 76-22, PG 82-34, PG 82-28, or PG 82-22. The PG in the title referring to Performance Graded, the first numeric designation referring to the binders high temperature rutting or deformation resistance temperature range limit. The last numeric designation references the cracking resistance temperature limit of the binder.


Areas of high loading or slow or standing traffic as well as areas where temperature extremes can be experienced in excess of 86° C. (187° F.) between high and low temperature levels will require the use of modifiers to obtain the increased useful temperature range. As a result, it has been common to start with softer asphalts to reach low temperature properties, while adding modifiers such as polymers to achieve high temperature rutting resistance. The use of aromatic oils also aids low temperature properties. As such, extensive levels of polymer addition is required to regain high temperature properties, especially when using aromatic oils. The use of aromatic oils can solvate the polymer to a higher degree and thus require a higher level of polymer to be used to obtain the desired high temperature rutting resistance.


A common practice of softening asphalts in the industry is to add heavy vacuum gas oil (HVGO) to paving asphalt to reach the desired useable temperature range (UTR). HVGO may be added after refining or, in some applications, it is not refined out of the asphalt materials. HVGO is a valuable commodity currently selling at about $150/ton premium over the price of asphalt, depending on the market. Therefore, adding HVGO to asphalt is an undesirable fix as it increases the cost of paving asphalt.


Notwithstanding the considerable efforts previously expended to provide an improved asphalt paving composition, there remains a continued need to increase the useable temperature range and reduce the cost associated with manufacturing asphalt paving materials. The present invention addresses both of these needs.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In producing methyl esters, including biodiesel, a feedstock containing all or a portion of vegetable oil or animal fats is reacted and refined to produce finished products. As a part of this process, a number of by-products are produced, having varying degrees of value. On the low end of the value spectrum are ester bottoms. Ester bottoms are a co-product of refining methyl ester, including biodiesel, that is not glycerin or skimmed fatty acids. Ester bottoms generally contain methyl esters, monoglycerides, diglycerides, triglycerides, sodium soaps produced from the addition of sodium methoxide (catalyst), and unsaponafiables. The unsaponafiables generally make up about 10% of the ester bottoms. Ester bottoms, as used in the preferred embodiment of this invention, have a viscosity range 10-900 cP at 64 degrees Celsius.


In the preferred embodiment, the invention involves the addition of ester bottoms to an asphalt paving composition to improve the useable temperature range (UTR). Very specifically, the ester bottoms affect the low temperature properties more significantly than the high temperature properties. Generally, the modified asphalt composition will comprise (a) about 0.1% to about 50% of ester bottoms, (b) about 0 to about 20% of a polymer modifier, (c) 50 to about 99.9% of an asphalt obtained from conventional vacuum distillation, solvent refining or naturally occurring mineral sources.


Refiners, or user producers, will often add a polymer to paving asphalt to increase the high temperature property of the paving asphalt for warmer climates. The ester bottom modified asphalt paving composition increases the useful temperature range. Therefore the amount of polymer additive required to reach a desirable higher temperature range can be reduced, thus reducing the cost of manufacturing pavement asphalt.


Another advantage of the invention is the amount of ester bottoms used to produce a desired finished product is less than the amount of HVGO (heavy vacuum gas oil), or other modifiers currently available, required to produce an equivalent amount of finished product.


A typical paving asphalt mixture comprises a mixture of components. Principal ingredients of the paving asphalt mixture are an asphalt composition or cement and aggregate or aggregate material. In such mixtures, the ratio of asphalt composition to aggregate material varies, for example, according to the aggregate material type and the nature of the asphalt composition. As used herein, the terms “asphalt composition”, “asphalt cement” or “asphalt binder” are understood to refer to any of a variety of organic materials, solid or semi-solid at room temperature, which gradually liquefy when heated, and in which the predominate constituents are naturally occurring bitumen, e.g., Trinidad Lake, or residues commonly obtained in petroleum, synthetic petroleum, or shale oil refining, or from coal tar or the like. For example, vacuum tower bottoms produced during the refining of conventional or synthetic petroleum oils is a common residue material useful as an asphalt composition. A “paving asphalt composition”, “paving asphalt cement”, or “paving asphalt binder”, accordingly is an asphalt composition or asphalt cement having characteristics which dispose the composition to use as a paving material. This is contrasted, for example, with an asphalt composition suited for use as a roofing material. “Roofing asphalts”, usually have a higher softening point, and are thus more resistant to flow from heat on roofs. The higher softening point is generally imparted by the air blowing processes by which they are commonly produced. Paving asphalt mixtures may be formed and applied in a variety of ways, as well understood by those skilled in the art. For example, the paving asphalt composition and the aggregate can be mixed and applied at elevated temperatures while in the fluid state to form the pavement or road surface. See particularly U.S. patent application Ser. No. 5,580,376 to Hayner.


Some examples of polymers used for modifying asphalts include: Styrene Butadiene (SB), ethylene-vinyl-acetate, ethylene-methyl-acrylate, ethylene butyl acrylate, poly-propylene, atactic polypropylene, polystyrene, polyethylene, LDPE, HDPE, oxidized high density poly-propylene, poly-phosphoric acid (PPA), natural rubber, polybutadiene, epoxy resins, polyurethane resins, acrylic resins, phenolic resins, gilsonite, lignin, diblock polymers, Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene (SBS), triblock polymers which may be either linear or radial, styrene-isoprene-styrene (SIS), diblocked polymers, hydrotreated SBS, Styrene Ethylene Butadiene Styrene polymers (SEBS), Styrene Butadiene Rubber (SBR), polyacrylamide, e.g., those described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,393,155; Glycidyl-containing ethylene copolymers in U.S. Pat. No. 5,331,028; or Crum Rubbers.


Asphalt is the most recycled material in the world. Milled road surfaces are reused. Many new roads are composed of 20% recycled asphalt and as high as 60% in some applications. The reclaimed asphalt is highly oxidized from years of use, and can be rejuvenated. There are rejuvenators currently on the market at a high price point. Another advantage of the invention is the ester bottoms can be used as a rejuvenator for recycled asphalt.


The ester bottom modified asphalt may have many desirable applications including but not limited to paving asphalt, asphalt emulsions, cutback asphalts, and roofing flux.


Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon a review of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments and the accompanying drawings.





IN THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic flow diagram for bio-refining.



FIG. 2 is a plot of ester bottoms vs. HVGO in asphalt.



FIG. 3 is a plot of ester bottoms PG temperatures for a number of different asphalt compositions.



FIG. 4 is a table of test results on a number of different asphalt compositions when mixed with various amounts of ester bottoms.



FIG. 5 is a table of test results on a number of different asphalt compositions when mixed with various amounts of ester bottoms.



FIG. 6 is a plot of results of tensile tests comparing an ester bottom modified asphalt with three polymer modified asphalts.



FIG. 7 is a plot of results of a rutting resistance test of an ester bottom modified asphalt with three polymer modified asphalts.



FIG. 8 is a plot of results of a compaction tension test comparing an ester bottom modified asphalt with two polymer modified asphalts.



FIG. 9 is a plot of a Semi Circular Bend test comparing an ester bottom modified asphalt with two polymer modified asphalts.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring to FIG. 1 feedstock is brought from the storage tanks to the dryer (T2101) wherein moisture is removed. This dry oil is then fed into a three-stage continuous reactor/settler system (T2102) where methoxide catalyst and methanol are added to each stage. Methanol reacts with the dry oil to produce methyl ester and glycerin. The dry oil is reacted to less than 1% monoglyceride and virtually no diglycerides or triglycerides as it leaves the last settler. Glycerin settles out of the of the reaction mixture and is directed from the reactors downstream for further refining. The ester phase is what remains after the glycerin is removed. The ester phase is then transferred to a single stage flash distillation tank (V-2107) to remove any remaining methanol. The ester phase is then water washed (T2103) to remove glycerin, soap, methanol, and methoxide catalyst. The washed methyl esters are dried under vacuum (T2104) to remove more methanol and water. Sodium methoxide is added to the dryer to back react any glycerin and monoglycerides into diglycerides and triglycerides. The methyl esters leave the ester dryer and are preheated before entering an ester surge tank (S2201). The methyl esters from the ester surge tank are then distilled to separate the purified methyl esters from the ester bottoms. The ester bottoms are transferred from the distillation tower (T2211) to an ester bottom surge tank (S2202) while the purified methyl ester is transferred from the distillation tower to a storage tank for distribution or sale.


The ester bottoms produced in methyl ester refining are added to any suitable asphalt composition or cement, for example, industrial asphalts used for coatings, sealants, roofing materials, adhesives, and other applications. However, paving grade asphalts are used in the preferred embodiment of the invention. The asphalt feed composition will determine the amount of ester bottoms required.


Referring now to FIG. 2, there is illustrated a comparison of heavy vacuum gas oil modified asphalt compared with ester bottoms modified asphalt. It can be seen in FIG. 2 that, at similar points, the ester bottoms modified asphalt produces a PG73-23 (UTR=96) versus a HVGO PG71-23 (UTR=94). Similarly, the higher the quantity of modifiers in the asphalt, the ester bottoms produce PG66-29 (UTR=95) versus an HVGO PG63-29 (UTR=92). The ester bottoms modified asphalt presents an improved UTR when compared with HVGO modified asphalts.


The type of asphalt used for the present invention can vary as illustrated by FIGS. 3 and 4. The asphalts may include solvent deasphalting bottoms (SDA). FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate testing which was done on a PG64-22 (Sample A), PG64-22 (Sample B), and two SDA blends (Samples C and D), and two stiff vacuum tower bottoms blends (Samples E and F). For instance, asphalt from two different refineries (Samples A&B), mixed with 3% ester bottoms resulted in different end products. Similarly, ester bottoms added to SDA or coker feeds affect the finished products differently. Therefore, the weight percentage of ester bottoms required for blending is determined by the asphalt composition.


EXAMPLE 1

Referring now to FIG. 4 a conventional PG 64-22 (Sample A) is used. The control sample at high temperature is approximately 65° C., and the low temperature compliance is actually −25° C. Ester bottoms are added to the Sample A and the resulting product has a high temperature compliance of 60.1° C. and a low temperature compliance of −29.6° C. The useable temperature range of the control equals 86° C. whereas the ester modified composition has a useable temperature range of 89.7° C.


EXAMPLE 2

Referring to FIG. 4, Sample B PG 64-22 has an initial high temperature control of 67.7° C. and the low temperature control is −24.6° C. resulting in a UTR of 92.3. After the addition of 3% ester bottoms the high temperature compliance is 62.4° C. and the low temperature compliance is −29.9° C. resulting in a useable temperature range of 93.2° C., while lowering the lower temperature compliance significantly.


EXAMPLE 3

Referring again to FIG. 4, Samples C & D, SOA blends, were tested. Sample C having a high temperature compliance of 67.7° C. and a low temperature compliance of −18° C. Ester bottoms were added in the amount of 2.25% and 5.77%. The 2.25% ester bottoms addition resulted in a UTR of 87.8° C., while the 5.77% ester bottoms addition resulted in a UTR 89° C. In the Sample D test the 3.70% ester bottoms addition resulted in an 89.8° C. UTR and a 7.1% ester bottoms addition resulted in an 88.8° C. UTR.


It can be seen from FIGS. 2-4 that ester bottoms modified asphalts are at least as good as, if not better at maintaining a UTR than the more expensive HVGO and SDA modified asphalts.


Referring now to FIG. 5, tensile strength testing was employed against three SDA modified binders (1, 2, 3) in comparison with an ester bottoms modified binder (4). Moisture sensitivity results for the three SDA modified PG64-22 asphalts and the ester bottoms modified blend show that the ester bottoms modified blend competed very well against binders 1, 2 and 3. Both dry and wet strains are very strong. During this test a disk-shaped sample of the binder is pulled apart to measure the crack initiation and propagation. By measuring the area under the load and the displacement curve, fracture energy is calculated for the sample. This test provides an understanding of a mixture's ability to resist cracking at both low and intermediate temperatures.


Referring now to FIG. 6 the results of a rutting resistance test, known as the Hamburg Wheel Test, compares binders 1, 2 and 3 against ester modified binder 4. Again, the ester modified binder 4 performs favorably when compared to the other refinery produced PG64-22. The test is performed by repeatedly tracking a loaded wheel over samples in heated bath water. The deformation of the samples versus the number of passes is observed. The Hamburg Wheel Test is used to measure both rutting and stripping risks.


Referring now to FIG. 7 the results of a Disk Shaped Compaction Tension test (DCT) are shown. The DCT is a measure of low temperature and reflective cracking. Binder 4 with the ester bottoms additive was compared against binders 2 and 3. Binder 4 again provided results equal and favorable to the refinery binders. During this test, one set of samples is tested as it exists. For this test, two sets of each binder are tested. One set of the mixed binders are tested as is under dry conditions. The second set of test binders is put through a freeze/fall cycle and is then conditioned in water. The strength for each mix is measured from the load required to crack the sample. The reported number of this graph is the strength ratio of the wet versus dry condition. This strength ratio provides information regarding the moisture susceptibility of the asphalt mix.



FIG. 8 provides the results of a Semi Circular Bend test against binder 2, binder 3 and binder 4 with ester bottoms. This test provides an indicator of resistance to crack propagation and predicts fracture performance. The test shows that binder 4 with ester bottoms additive performed better than binders 2 and 3. The test is performed by 3 point bending of a semi-circular shaped specimen with an introduced notch. This induces tension at the bottom of the sample, resulting in crack propagation throughout the specimen. The energy required to fracture the sample is calculated. The test is run at normal temperatures.


The above detailed description of the present invention is given for explanatory purposes. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous changes and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the whole of the foregoing description is to be construed in an illustrative and not a limitative sense, the scope of the invention being defined solely by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of making paving asphalt comprising: adding 0.1 wt % to 20 wt % ester bottoms to an asphalt mixture wherein the ester bottoms are a byproduct of methyl ester refining; andadding 0-20 wt % of a polymer modifier to the ester bottoms and asphalt mixture.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the ester bottoms contain methyl esters, sodium soap, monoglycerides, diglycerides, triglycerides, and unsaponifiables.
  • 3. The method according to claim 2 wherein the unsaponifiables make up about 10 wt % of the ester bottoms.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the ester bottoms have a viscosity range of 10-900 cp at 64° C.
  • 5. A method of making a paving asphalt comprising adding ester bottoms to an asphalt mixture to increase the useable temperature range of the paving asphalt, wherein the ester bottoms are a byproduct of methyl ester refining.
  • 6. A method of making a paving asphalt comprising adding ester bottoms to an asphalt mixture to meet a predetermined useable temperature range, wherein the ester bottoms are a byproduct of methyl ester refining.
  • 7. A modified asphalt composition comprising: 50 wt % to about 99.9 wt % of an asphalt;0 wt % to about 20 wt % of an asphalt-modifying polymer; and0.1 wt % to about 50 wt % of ester bottoms, the ester bottoms being defined as distillation bottoms of distilled reaction products from reaction of methanol and dry oil that have settled glycerin removed therefrom prior to distillation.
  • 8. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein the ester bottoms include unsaponifiables in an amount of at least about 10% thereof.
  • 9. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein the ester bottoms are without skimmed fatty acids.
  • 10. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein the ester bottoms include one or more sodium soaps.
  • 11. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein the ester bottoms have a viscosity range of between about 10 cP and about 900 cP at 64° C.
  • 12. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein the ester bottoms include diglycerides and triglycerides.
  • 13. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein the asphalt includes from about 20 wt % to about 60 wt % recycled asphalt.
  • 14. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein the asphalt-modifying polymer has one or more monomers selected from the group consisting of butadiene, styrene, vinyl acetate, ethylene, propylene, acrylate, isoprene, and acrylamide.
  • 15. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein a useable temperature range of the modified asphalt composition is greater than an asphalt composition without ester bottoms.
  • 16. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein the dry oil includes one or more of a vegetable oil or an animal fat that has been at least partially dried to remove moisture therefrom.
  • 17. A modified asphalt composition comprising: 50 wt % to about 99.9 wt % of an asphalt;0 wt % to about 20 wt % of a polymer modifier; and0.1 wt % to about 50 wt % of ester bottoms, the ester bottoms being defined as distillation bottoms of a water-washed reaction product between methanol and dry oil from which settled glycerin is removed from the water-washed reaction product prior to distillation, the dry oil containing one or more of a vegetable oil or an animal fat that has been dried to remove at least some moisture therefrom.
  • 18. The modified asphalt composition of claim 17, wherein the ester bottoms include unsaponifiables in an amount of at least about 10% thereof.
  • 19. The modified asphalt composition of claim 17, wherein the ester bottoms include one or more sodium soaps.
  • 20. The modified asphalt composition of claim 17, wherein the ester bottoms have a viscosity range of between about 10 cP and about 900 cP at 64° C.
  • 21. The modified asphalt composition of claim 17, wherein the asphalt includes from about 20 wt % to about 60 wt % recycled asphalt.
  • 22. A modified asphalt composition comprising: 50 wt % to about 99.9 wt % of an asphalt;0 wt % to about 20 wt % of an asphalt modifier selected from the group consisting of a polymer, a resin, polyphosphoric acid, gilsonite, lignin and crumb rubber; and0.1 wt % to about 50 wt % of ester bottoms, the ester bottoms being defined as distillation bottoms of a water-washed methyl ester reaction product between reagents methanol and at least one of vegetable oil or animal fat from which glycerin is settled and removed from the methyl ester reaction product prior to distillation.
  • 23. The modified asphalt composition of claim 22, wherein the ester bottoms include unsaponifiables in an amount of at least about 10% thereof.
  • 24. The modified asphalt composition of claim 22, wherein the ester bottoms include one or more sodium soaps.
  • 25. The modified asphalt composition of claim 22, wherein the ester bottoms have a viscosity range of between about 10 cP and about 900 cP at 64° C.
  • 26. The modified asphalt composition of claim 22, wherein the asphalt includes from about 20 wt % to about 60 wt % recycled asphalt.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present patent application is based upon and claims the benefit of provisional patent application No. 62/341,700, filed on May 26, 2016.The present patent application is a divisional reissue application of U.S. Reissue application Ser. No. 17/345,859, filed Jun. 11, 2021, which is a reissue application for U.S. Pat. No. 10,323,148, issued on Jun. 18, 2019, from U.S. application Ser. No. 15/586,860, filed May 4, 2017, which is a non-provisional application claiming priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/341,700, filed May 26, 2016. The content of the above-identified applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The reissue application numbers are U.S. Reissue application Ser. No. 17/345,859, now U.S. Pat. No. RE 49,447, and U.S. Reissue application Ser. No. 18/101,464, the present application, which is a divisional reissue application of U.S. Reissue application Ser. No. 17/345,859. Notice: More than one reissue application has been filed related to U.S. Pat. No. 10,323,148.

US Referenced Citations (349)
Number Name Date Kind
2027404 Small Jan 1936 A
2102124 Lithgow Dec 1937 A
2290038 Folmsbee Jul 1942 A
2605193 Karll Jul 1952 A
2850436 Beuther Sep 1958 A
2877129 Hardman et al. Mar 1959 A
2906635 Teot Sep 1959 A
3047414 Katz Jul 1962 A
3072284 Luhman Jan 1963 A
3162101 Rostler Dec 1964 A
3221615 McGovern Dec 1965 A
3238173 Bailey Mar 1966 A
3261269 McGovern Jul 1966 A
3344056 Rostler Sep 1967 A
3432321 Rostler Mar 1969 A
3556827 McConnaughay Jan 1971 A
3867111 Knowles Feb 1975 A
3955416 Waiwood May 1976 A
3992340 Bonitz Nov 1976 A
4064826 Pauli Dec 1977 A
4073625 Kiritani et al. Feb 1978 A
4082823 Augustine Apr 1978 A
4084915 Wiseblood Apr 1978 A
4112765 Hollweck Sep 1978 A
4130474 Anthony Dec 1978 A
4145322 Maldonado Mar 1979 A
4154710 Maldonado May 1979 A
4162999 Bohemen Jul 1979 A
4237052 Fitoussi Dec 1980 A
4242246 Maldonado Dec 1980 A
4320788 Lord Mar 1982 A
4323496 Mitani Apr 1982 A
4330449 Maldonado May 1982 A
4373961 Stone Feb 1983 A
4392870 Chieffo Jul 1983 A
4541735 Abu-Isa Sep 1985 A
4549834 Allen Oct 1985 A
4554313 Hagenbach Nov 1985 A
4564834 Steele Jan 1986 A
4585816 Vitkuske Apr 1986 A
4647313 Clementoni Mar 1987 A
4762565 Graf Aug 1988 A
4789946 Sinz Dec 1988 A
4971219 Dombeck et al. Nov 1990 A
5008653 Kidd Apr 1991 A
5023282 Neubert Jun 1991 A
5039342 Jelling Aug 1991 A
5050603 Stokes Sep 1991 A
5083870 Sindelar et al. Jan 1992 A
5118733 Gelles Jun 1992 A
5120777 Chaverot Jun 1992 A
5177130 Beavers Jan 1993 A
5180428 Koleas Jan 1993 A
5234494 Sawatzky et al. Aug 1993 A
5472928 Scheuerman et al. Dec 1995 A
5498327 Stangeland et al. Mar 1996 A
5511573 Corte Apr 1996 A
5559166 Bearden Sep 1996 A
5589057 Trimble et al. Dec 1996 A
5601697 Miller Feb 1997 A
5660715 Trimble et al. Aug 1997 A
5681369 Osborne Oct 1997 A
5766333 Lukens Jun 1998 A
5816708 Urich Oct 1998 A
5853455 Gibson Dec 1998 A
5911817 Hayner Jun 1999 A
5916529 Scheuerman Jun 1999 A
5938130 Zickell Aug 1999 A
5966311 Stemporzewski, Jr. Oct 1999 A
6001162 Hayner Dec 1999 A
6015440 Noureddini Jan 2000 A
6048447 Hayner Apr 2000 A
6074128 Marino Jun 2000 A
6083988 Becker Jul 2000 A
6086749 Kramer et al. Jul 2000 A
6133351 Hayner Oct 2000 A
6153004 Hayner Nov 2000 A
6156113 Pasquier Dec 2000 A
6174501 Noureddini Jan 2001 B1
6203585 Majerczak Mar 2001 B1
6214103 Kitagawa Apr 2001 B1
6223789 Koch May 2001 B1
6235104 Chattopadhyay May 2001 B1
6249241 Jordan et al. Jun 2001 B1
6290152 Zickell Sep 2001 B1
6318402 Ladeira Nov 2001 B1
6336479 Nanaji Jan 2002 B1
6348074 Wenzel Feb 2002 B2
6352637 Doolin et al. Mar 2002 B1
6380284 Lopez Apr 2002 B1
6384112 Boussad May 2002 B1
6394149 Parsons May 2002 B1
6414056 Puzic Jul 2002 B1
6414066 Lem Jul 2002 B1
6416249 Crupi Jul 2002 B1
6417421 Yao Jul 2002 B1
6514331 Varnadoe et al. Feb 2003 B2
6514332 Varnadoe et al. Feb 2003 B2
6548580 Rohde Apr 2003 B1
6575326 Martin, Jr. Jun 2003 B2
6615658 Snelling Sep 2003 B2
6659684 Goodhart et al. Dec 2003 B1
6749677 Freisthler Jun 2004 B2
6764542 Lackey et al. Jul 2004 B1
6776832 Spence et al. Aug 2004 B2
6802897 Lackey Oct 2004 B1
6852779 Planche Feb 2005 B1
6927245 Buras et al. Aug 2005 B2
6932123 Craig Aug 2005 B1
6935387 Blubaugh Aug 2005 B1
6948364 Snelling Sep 2005 B2
6952996 Sisk et al. Oct 2005 B2
6973828 Zimmermann Dec 2005 B2
7008670 Freisthler Mar 2006 B1
7028382 Fisher Apr 2006 B2
7041717 Margulis May 2006 B2
7047114 Rogers May 2006 B1
7241821 Hayner et al. Jul 2007 B1
7297204 Crews et al. Nov 2007 B2
7309390 Falkiewicz Dec 2007 B2
7357594 Takamura Apr 2008 B2
7417081 Nakajima et al. Aug 2008 B2
7503724 Blacklidge Mar 2009 B2
7568835 Pils Aug 2009 B2
7645114 Cannon et al. Jan 2010 B2
7753618 Constantz et al. Jul 2010 B2
7811372 Nigen-Chaidron et al. Oct 2010 B2
7829053 Constantz et al. Nov 2010 B2
7848912 Bertini Dec 2010 B2
7849802 Dalrymple Dec 2010 B2
7918624 Blacklidge Apr 2011 B2
7951857 Crews et al. May 2011 B2
7993442 Crews et al. Aug 2011 B2
8026380 Hassan Sep 2011 B2
8088845 Le Clerc et al. Jan 2012 B2
8133316 Poncelet et al. Mar 2012 B2
8193401 McGehee et al. Jun 2012 B2
8206500 Mathis et al. Jun 2012 B1
8278451 Becker et al. Oct 2012 B2
8286673 Recker et al. Oct 2012 B1
8316708 Horst Nov 2012 B2
8337117 Vitale et al. Dec 2012 B2
8404037 Naidoo et al. Mar 2013 B2
8454979 Mitarai et al. Jun 2013 B2
8562864 Rodrigues et al. Oct 2013 B2
8634970 Lee et al. Jan 2014 B2
8722771 Vaidya et al. May 2014 B2
8783280 Yandle Jul 2014 B2
8789564 Jividen et al. Jul 2014 B2
8814464 McDade et al. Aug 2014 B2
8821064 Morris et al. Sep 2014 B1
8859649 Ranka Oct 2014 B2
8926742 Coe Jan 2015 B2
8968457 Payne Mar 2015 B2
8979982 Jordan Mar 2015 B2
8992118 Coe Mar 2015 B2
9028602 Chughtai et al. May 2015 B2
9115295 Deneuvillers et al. Aug 2015 B2
9133581 Devenney et al. Sep 2015 B2
9139720 Avramidis et al. Sep 2015 B2
9139733 McDade et al. Sep 2015 B2
9139953 Ahluwalia Sep 2015 B2
9150140 Girard et al. Oct 2015 B2
9200205 Bran et al. Dec 2015 B2
9295992 Zickell Mar 2016 B2
9347187 Coe May 2016 B2
9376565 Subotic et al. Jun 2016 B2
9409336 De Amorim Novais Da Costa Nóbrega et al. Aug 2016 B2
9416274 Frank Aug 2016 B2
9481794 Cox Nov 2016 B2
9493633 Rowland et al. Nov 2016 B2
9513135 MacNeille et al. Dec 2016 B2
9523003 Williams et al. Dec 2016 B2
9556631 Brooks et al. Jan 2017 B2
9597628 Kummerer et al. Mar 2017 B2
9650580 Merdrignac et al. May 2017 B2
9776165 Tour et al. Oct 2017 B2
9790360 Puchalski et al. Oct 2017 B2
9862820 Kim et al. Jan 2018 B2
9868855 Merck et al. Jan 2018 B2
9969884 Murthy et al. May 2018 B2
9982136 Cao et al. May 2018 B2
10030145 Severance et al. Jul 2018 B2
10076430 Klausen Sep 2018 B2
10127515 Borgerson et al. Nov 2018 B2
10174201 Avramidis Jan 2019 B2
10214617 Bruns et al. Feb 2019 B1
10233120 Flanigan Mar 2019 B2
10294616 Crupi et al. May 2019 B2
10316192 Kurth et al. Jun 2019 B2
10323147 Brewster et al. Jun 2019 B1
10323148 Brewster et al. Jun 2019 B1
10329426 Kurth et al. Jun 2019 B2
10337154 Baumrind Jul 2019 B2
10339478 Grant et al. Jul 2019 B2
10363529 Alberty Jul 2019 B1
10442872 Besse et al. Oct 2019 B2
10449502 Rovani, Jr. et al. Oct 2019 B2
10527547 Hofko et al. Jan 2020 B2
10570286 Williams Feb 2020 B2
10626050 Muncy et al. Apr 2020 B2
10626275 Coe Apr 2020 B2
10669203 Franzen et al. Jun 2020 B2
10669463 Bahr Jun 2020 B2
10724183 Coe Jul 2020 B2
10767033 Kluttz et al. Sep 2020 B2
10793720 Puchalski et al. Oct 2020 B2
10794017 Coe Oct 2020 B2
10889940 Crupi Jan 2021 B2
10961395 Williams et al. Mar 2021 B2
10982097 Larusso et al. Apr 2021 B2
10988617 McClellan, Jr. et al. Apr 2021 B2
11077045 Sen et al. Aug 2021 B2
11091642 Kurth et al. Aug 2021 B2
11097981 Reinke et al. Aug 2021 B2
11124926 Fennell et al. Sep 2021 B2
11155696 Fini Oct 2021 B2
11193243 Chesky Dec 2021 B2
11225576 Jorda et al. Jan 2022 B2
11274208 Colange et al. Mar 2022 B2
11365318 Kwon et al. Jun 2022 B2
11390750 Baumgardner et al. Jul 2022 B2
11414549 Allen et al. Aug 2022 B2
11421109 McCurdy et al. Aug 2022 B2
11427697 Reinke et al. Aug 2022 B2
11447637 Gabel et al. Sep 2022 B2
11512437 McDade Nov 2022 B2
RE49447 Brewster et al. Mar 2023 E
11623990 Baumgardner Apr 2023 B2
11634875 Fennell et al. Apr 2023 B2
11655419 Nicholson May 2023 B2
11732108 Hayner Aug 2023 B1
11814506 Clopotel et al. Nov 2023 B2
20020026884 Raad Mar 2002 A1
20070277430 Jones et al. Dec 2007 A1
20090036694 Hassan et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090056201 Morgan Mar 2009 A1
20090127499 Blubaugh et al. May 2009 A1
20090137705 Faucon et al. May 2009 A1
20090187450 Kocis Jul 2009 A1
20090226254 Jones Sep 2009 A1
20100034586 Bailey et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100048771 Osborn Feb 2010 A1
20100062219 Richards Mar 2010 A1
20100088142 El-Bakry et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100020918 Wiley Aug 2010 A1
20100280750 Chen Nov 2010 A1
20100289654 Hunter Nov 2010 A1
20110105652 Hergenrother May 2011 A1
20110233105 Bailey Sep 2011 A1
20120017804 Venema et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120060722 Montpeyroux et al. Mar 2012 A1
20130197134 Leal et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130276668 Ranka et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130344012 Christensen et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140270953 Duffy Sep 2014 A1
20140284520 Littich et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140310049 Goel Oct 2014 A1
20140343192 Cochran et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140356526 O'Connell et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150012326 Furman Jan 2015 A1
20150087753 Koleas et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150307013 Tremblay et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150324740 Shao Nov 2015 A1
20160052169 Baumrind et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160122507 Cox May 2016 A1
20160194581 Summers et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160236980 Mullenbach et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160289452 O'Connell et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160362338 Reinke et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160376440 Naidoo et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170096092 Cannon Apr 2017 A1
20170107376 Winship et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170114281 Gupta et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170152384 Eijkenboom Jun 2017 A1
20170306570 Crupi et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170349725 Broere Dec 2017 A1
20170370899 Porot et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180010305 Bentaj et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180032926 DeLuca Feb 2018 A1
20180044529 Kurth et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180112303 Antony Apr 2018 A1
20180148575 Kurth et al. May 2018 A1
20180200264 Blau et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180266578 Baxter Sep 2018 A1
20180060808 Borgerson et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180340068 McCurdy et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180371251 Avramidis et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190016965 Aldous Jan 2019 A1
20190048191 Leon et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190153229 Reinke et al. May 2019 A1
20190300714 Watson et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190375940 Franzen et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200002538 Wissel et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200032063 Lungren et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200050202 Suresh Feb 2020 A1
20200094924 Gaziotis et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200118068 Turetsky et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200123449 Nicholson Apr 2020 A1
20200165459 Williams et al. May 2020 A1
20200265377 Al Dhaheri et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200277497 Reinke et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200317925 Hassan et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200332126 Donelson Oct 2020 A1
20200372375 Pathak et al. Nov 2020 A1
20210002484 Clopotel Jan 2021 A1
20210017386 Reinke et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210054210 Hemsley et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210079224 Cochran et al. Mar 2021 A1
20210095429 Murphy et al. Apr 2021 A1
20210139374 Bruns et al. May 2021 A1
20210147751 Fini et al. May 2021 A1
20210189133 Grzybowski Jun 2021 A1
20210214057 Tsujimoto Jul 2021 A1
20210230255 Amadoro et al. Jul 2021 A1
20210230818 Fennell et al. Jul 2021 A1
20210236815 Waldstreicher et al. Aug 2021 A1
20210238093 Eyster Aug 2021 A1
20210241221 Pathak et al. Aug 2021 A1
20210284574 Kurth et al. Sep 2021 A1
20210334650 Celano Oct 2021 A1
20210338562 Akthakul et al. Nov 2021 A1
20210362637 Hanis Nov 2021 A1
20210371339 Dennis et al. Dec 2021 A1
20210371567 Vanderhoof et al. Dec 2021 A1
20220001345 Ahn et al. Jan 2022 A1
20220002548 Wissel et al. Jan 2022 A1
20220033305 Cochran et al. Feb 2022 A1
20220089832 Yi et al. Mar 2022 A1
20220101272 Sunde et al. Mar 2022 A1
20220106537 Aritake et al. Apr 2022 A1
20220112130 Williams et al. Apr 2022 A1
20220153645 Zhou May 2022 A1
20220243066 Noel Aug 2022 A1
20220267602 Cooley et al. Aug 2022 A1
20220281212 Bhattacharya et al. Sep 2022 A1
20220315766 Baumgardner et al. Oct 2022 A1
20220372257 Coe Nov 2022 A1
20220389669 Miller Dec 2022 A1
20220402819 Mangel et al. Dec 2022 A1
20230033496 Townsend et al. Feb 2023 A1
20230072410 Inoubli et al. Mar 2023 A1
20230085865 Bruns et al. Mar 2023 A1
20230086227 Bruns et al. Mar 2023 A1
20230092077 Lorenzen et al. Mar 2023 A1
20230193031 Clopotel et al. Jun 2023 A1
20230193035 Clopotel et al. Jun 2023 A1
20230348723 Clopotel et al. Nov 2023 A1
20240409815 Clopotel Dec 2024 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (35)
Number Date Country
1262976 Nov 1989 CA
2871674 Feb 2007 CN
106934143 Jul 2017 CN
206917912 Jan 2018 CN
111879637 Nov 2020 CN
111986520 Nov 2020 CN
113110464 Jul 2021 CN
113921091 Jan 2022 CN
114112889 Mar 2022 CN
114113552 Mar 2022 CN
4124142 Jan 1993 DE
9213661 Jan 1993 DE
19519539 Dec 1995 DE
0870291 Oct 1998 EP
2290010 Mar 2011 EP
3291206 Mar 2018 EP
3441260 Feb 2019 EP
2478122 Sep 1981 FR
2205104 Nov 1988 GB
293683 Mar 2018 IN
10-2017-0011981 Feb 2017 KR
101952894 Feb 2019 KR
102195378 Dec 2020 KR
102597632 Nov 2023 KR
157791 Jul 1992 PL
1787994 Jan 1993 RU
2123719 Dec 1998 RU
816996 Mar 1981 SU
200055257 Sep 2000 WO
2007068461 Jun 2007 WO
WO-2007068461 Jun 2007 WO
2009147360 Dec 2009 WO
2011034423 Mar 2011 WO
20190234434 Dec 2019 WO
2021254815 Dec 2021 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (13)
Entry
Acromag, Whitepaper: Introduction to the Two-Wire Transmitter and the 4-20MA Current Loop, Nov. 8, 2010, available at http://www.automation.com/pdf-articles/Acromag-Intro-TwoWire-Transmitters-4-20mA-Current-Loop-904A.pdf.
Dataforth Corporation, Application Note: 4-20 mA Transmitters, May 24, 2002, available at http://www.dataforth.com/catalog/bb/152-138011998.pdf.
Raptor Overfill Protection Probe, TPF, Inc., Jun. 3, 2013, available at http://tpftherm.com/pdf/2TPFB.pdf.
Lee et al. A decision support system for vessel speed decision in maritime logistics using weather archive big data, 2017, Elsevier, Computers and Operations Research 98, 330-342 (Year: 2017).
Torralba A. et al., Paper 132—Smart Navigation System for the Port of Seville, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Sep. 7-11, 2015.
Etienne, Mary et al., Intelligent Maritime Modern Ships and Ports, Dell Technologies and Intel Corporation, May 2020.
Negenborn, Rudy et al., Smart Port, Smart ships and the changing maritime ecosystem, SmartPort, Sep. 2018.
Lind, Mikael et al., Sea Traffic Management—Beneficial for all Maritime Stakeholders, Transportation Research Procedia, Dec. 2016.
Xiao, Yi et al., Digital empowerment for shipping development: a framework for establishing a smart shipping index system, Maritime Policy & Management, Feb. 27, 2021.
Tian Zhe et al., The Development of Key Technologies in Applications of Vessels Connected to the Internet, Symmetry, 2017.
Van Westrenen et al., Maritime traffic management: a need for central coordination?, Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012.
Emco Wheaton, Vapor Transfer Vents, 2020. https://www.gardnerdenver.com/en-us/emcowheaton/fuel-systems/tank-truck-equipment/vapor-transfer-vents.
Sun, Zhaojie et al., Investigation of the potential application of biodiesel by-product as asphalt modifier, Road Materials and Pavement Design 17(3):1-16, Oct. 2015.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62341700 May 2016 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 17345859 Jun 2021 US
Child 18101464 US
Reissues (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 15586860 May 2017 US
Child 17345859 US
Parent 15586860 May 2017 US
Child 18101464 US