Elevator systems are useful for carrying passengers, cargo or both between various levels in a building, for example. Some elevator systems are traction-based and utilize load bearing traction members such as ropes or belts for supporting the elevator car and achieving the desired movement and placement of the elevator car.
Example belts are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,295,799; 6,364,061; and 6,739,433.
Techniques for making such belts have included using a mold wheel to support cords as they are covered by a thermoplastic polymer. One disadvantage to the mold wheel process is that it results in grooves on the exterior surface of the jacket of the belt because of how the cords are supported on the mold wheel during the manufacturing process. Such grooves are believed to be disadvantageous.
One challenge associated with known processes for making such belts includes controlling the position of the cords during the jacket application process. The position must be controlled and maintained precisely to provide a belt of a desired configuration. Additionally, there are challenges associated with securing the elastomer jacket material to the cords.
Further, the jacket material must flow during the manufacturing process to provide good control on the outer dimensions of the jacket. This requirement for elastomer flow sets a lower limit on the thickness of the jacket layer that can be achieved. In a linear extrusion process, the orifice must be wide enough to allow reasonably linear flow at linear speeds that are high enough to make a practical elevator belt. In a mold wheel process, an elastomer must be present to allow flow to completely and uniformly coat each cord.
It would be useful to be able to minimize or avoid such challenges and considerations when making a belt for use as an elevator load bearing and traction member.
An exemplary method of making a load bearing elevator traction belt includes applying individual coatings of a jacket material to each of a plurality of tension members such that each tension member is individually coated separately from the other tension members. A portion of the individual coatings are joined together to secure the tension members into a desired alignment and to form a single jacket that establishes the geometry of the belt.
The various features and advantages of the disclosed examples will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
The LBETB 30 includes a jacket 34 that at least partially surrounds the tension members 32. In the example of
Joining the individual coatings 34′ together in one example includes at least partially melting the jacket material of the individual coatings 34′ at least in the vicinity of the areas indicated at 36 to join the coatings of adjacent coatings. One example includes joining the coatings 34′ by fusing the jacket material of the coatings to that of adjacent coatings 34′. Another example includes joining the coatings 34′ together by welding the jacket material of the individual coatings 34′ together.
One example includes adhesively joining the individual coatings 34′ together by applying an adhesive to an interface 36 between adjacent ones of the coatings 34′. Another example includes introducing a molten thermoplastic material onto selected portions of adjacent individual coatings 34′ to adhesively secure them together.
In the example of
There are various features associated with the disclosed technique for making an LBETB. The thickness of the coating (e.g., the cross-sectional dimensions of the jacket 34) can be varied according to the needs of particular situations. For example, it is possible to use much thinner coatings 34′ when individually coating the tension members 32 compared to applying a jacket material to an entire series of tension members simultaneously. Additionally, it is possible to achieve thicker coatings compared to previous techniques if that is desired. The addition of another material such as the example materials 40 and 42 in
Another feature of some of the illustrated examples such as those in
In another example, the molding device 62 includes a mold wheel upon which the individually coated tension members 32 are placed. A thermoplastic elastomer 64 is added onto the coatings on the mold wheel. The individual coatings 34′ are fused together using the additional thermoplastic elastomer.
In one example, the molding device 62 includes a heated mold wheel. Each individually coated tension member 32 is guided onto the hot mold wheel. Controlling the temperature of the mold wheel allows for avoiding any movement of the tension members 32 within their individual coatings 34′ during the joining process. This also allows for more precisely controlling the positions of the tension members 32 within the assembly and controlling the amount of elastomer used for the jacket 34.
The example manufacturing techniques for an LBETB 30 allow for faster manufacture at a lower cost and increase the capacity for incorporating different material. With the disclosed examples, better cord position control can be achieved compared to previous arrangements. Having better cord position control results in more consistent belt geometry.
With the disclosed examples, a wider variety of belt configurations become possible without complicating or reducing the economies of a manufacturing process.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/083491 | 11/14/2008 | WO | 00 | 4/12/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/056247 | 5/20/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2545370 | Mittelmann | Mar 1951 | A |
2577427 | McDermott et al. | Dec 1951 | A |
3464197 | Martin | Sep 1969 | A |
4022010 | Gladenbeck et al. | May 1977 | A |
4197695 | Hughes et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4227041 | Den et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4531959 | Kar et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4550559 | Thomson | Nov 1985 | A |
5881843 | O'Donnell et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6364061 | Baranda et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6401871 | Baranda et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6412265 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6863761 | Knutson | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6983826 | Wake et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7086217 | Eichhorn et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
20020000346 | Baranda et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030078125 | Knutson | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030092524 | Baranda et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040083707 | Eichhorn et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040206579 | Baranda et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050274101 | Wang | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060180402 | Silberhorn et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20110226562 | Goser | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110226563 | Goser | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2538691 | Mar 1977 | DE |
87 02 678.3 | Jul 1987 | DE |
1886958 | Feb 2008 | EP |
5960909 | Apr 1984 | JP |
60159719 | Oct 1985 | JP |
WO9831892 | Jul 1998 | WO |
03042085 | May 2003 | WO |
WO2008110241 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO2008013861 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO2008135317 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Aug. 17, 2009 for PCT/US2008/083491. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International application No. PCT/US2008/083491 mailed May 26, 2011. |
Chinese Search Report for Application No. 200880132006.7 dated Feb. 18, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110240408 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |