Method of making flat panel displays having diamond thin film cathode

Abstract
A field emission cathode is provided which includes a substrate and a conductive layer desposed adjacent the substrate. An electrically resistive pillar is disposed adjacent the conductive layer, the resistive pillar having a substantially flat surface spaced from and substantially parallel to the substrate. A layer of diamond is disposed adjacent the surface of the resistive pillar.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates in general to flat panel displays for computers and the like and, more specifically, to such displays incorporating diamond film to improve image intensity at low cost.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Field emitters are useful in various applications such as flat panel displays and vacuum microelectronics. Field emission based flat panel displays have several advantages over other types of flat panel displays, which include low power consumption, high intensity and low projected cost. Current field emitters using micro-fabricated metal tips suffer from complex fabrication process and very low yield, thereby increasing the display cost. Thus, an improved field emitter material and device structure, and a less complex fabrication process is clearly desired. This invention addresses all of these issues.




The present invention can be better appreciated with an understanding of the related physics. In general, the energy of electrons on surface of a metal or semiconductor is lower than electrons at rest in vacuum. In order to emit the electrons from any material to vacuum, energy must be supplied to the electrons inside the material. That is, the metal fails to emit electrons unless the electrons are provided with energy greater than or equal to the electrons at rest in the vacuum. Energy can be provided by numerous means, such as by heat or irradiation with light. When sufficient energy is imparted to the metal, emission occurs and the metal emits electrons. Several types of electron emission phenomena are known. Thermionic emission involves an electrically charged particle emitted by an incandescent substance (as in a vacuum tube or incandescent light bulb). Photoemission releases electrons from a material by means of energy supplied by incidence of radiation, especially light. Secondary emission occurs by bombardment of a substance with charged particles such as electrons or ions. Electron injection involves the emission from one solid to another. Finally, field emission refers to the emission of electrons due to an electric field.




In field emission, electrons under the influence of a strong electric field are injected out of a substance (usually a metal or semiconductor) into a dielectric (usually vacuum). The electrons “tunnel” through a potential barrier instead of escaping “over” it as in thermionic of photo-emission. Field emission was first correctly treated as a quantum mechanical tunneling phenomenon by Fowler and Nordheim (FN). The total emission current j is given by









j
=







(


1.54






10

-
6





V
2



β
2




ø







t
2



(
y
)






exp


(



-

(

6.83






10
9


)




ø

3
/
2




v


(
y
)



β





d

V

)







(
1
)













as calculated from the Schrodinger equation using the WKB approximation. For electrical fields typically applied, v(y) varies between 0.9 and 1.0, and t is very close to 1.0. Hence, as a rough approximation these functions may be ignored in equation (1), in which case it is evident that a “FN plot” of ln(j/V


2


) vs 1/V should result in a straight line with slope—(6.83×10


9





3/2


βd and intercept (1.54×10


−6





2


/ø. A more detailed discussion of the physics of field emission can be found in R. J. Noer “Electron Field Emission from Broad Area Electrodes”, Appli. Phys., A-28, 1-24 (1982); Cade and Lee, “Vacuum Microelectronics”, GEC J. Res. Inc., Marconi Rev., 7(3), 129 (1990); and Cutler and Tsong, Field Emission and Related Topics (1978).




For a typical metal with a phi of 4.5 eV, an electric field on the order of 10


9


V/m is needed to get measurable emission currents. The high electric fields needed for field emission require geometric enhancement of the field at a sharp emission tip, in order that unambiguous field emission can be observed, rather than some dielectric breakdown in the electrode support dielectric materials. The shape of a field emitter effects its emission characteristics. Field emission is most easily obtained from sharply pointed needles or tips. The typical structure of a lithographically defined sharp tip for a cold cathode is made up of small emitter structures 1-2 μm in height, with submicron (<50 nm) emitting tips. These are separated from a 0.5 μm thick metal grid by a layer of silicon dioxide. Results from Stanford Research Institute (“SRI”) have shown that 100 μA/tip at a cathode-grid bias of 100-200 V. An overview of vacuum electronics and Spindt type cathodes is found in the November and December, 1989, issues of IEEE Transactions of Electronic Devices. Fabrication of such fine tips, however, normally requires extensive fabrication facilities to finely tailor the emitter into a conical shape. Further, it is difficult to build large area field emitters since the cone size is limited by the lithographic equipment. It is also difficult to perform fine feature lithography on large area substrates as required by flat panel display type applications.




The electron affinity (also called work function) of the electron emitting surface or tip of a field emitter also affects emission characteristics. Electron affinity is the voltage (or energy) required to extract or emit electrons from a surface. The lower the electron affinity, the lower the voltage required to produce a particular amount of emission. If the electron affinity is negative then the surface shall spontaneously emit electrons until stopped by space charge, although the space charge can be overcome by applying a small voltage, e.g. 5 volts. Compared to the 1,000 to 2,000 volts normally required to achieve field emission from tungsten, a widely used field emitter, such small voltages are highly advantageous. There are several materials which exhibit negative electron affinity, but almost all of these materials are alkali metal-based. Alkali metals are very sensitive to atmospheric conditions and tend to decompose when exposed to air or moisture. Additionally, alkali metals have low melting points, typically below 1000° C., which is unsuitable in most applications.




For a full understanding of the prior art related to the present invention, certain attributes of diamond must also be discussed. Recently, it has been experimentally confirmed that the (111) surface of diamond crystal has an electron affinity of −0.7+/−0.5 electron volts, showing it to possess negative electron affinity. Diamond cold cathodes have been reported by Geis et al. in “Diamond Cold Cathode”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol 12, No. 8, August 1991, pp. 456-459; and in “Diamond Cold Cathodes”, Applications of Diamond Films and Related Materials, Tzeng et al. (Editors), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1991, pp. 309-310. The diamond cold cathodes are formed by fabricating mesa-etched diodes using carbon ion implantation into p-type diamond substrates. Recently, Kordesch et al (“Cold field emission from CVD diamond films observed in emission electron microscopy”, 1991) reported that thick (100 μm) chemical vapor deposited polycrystalline diamond films fabricated at high temperatures have been observed to emit electrons with an intensity sufficient to form an image in the accelerating field of an emission microscope without external excitation (<3 MV/m). It is obvious that diamond thin film will be a low electric field cathode material for various applications.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with the present invention, a flat panel display is provided which incorporates diamond film to improve image intensity at low cost.




The present invention specifically provides for a flat panel display with a diamond field emission cathode to achieve the advantages noted above.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:





FIG. 1

shows the step of depositing a blanket layer of metal on a glass substrate and a photoresist layer on the metal layer;





FIG. 2

shows the step of removing any remaining photoresist after etching;





FIG. 3

shows the step of depositing conductive pillars on the layer of metal;





FIG. 4

shows a cross-sectional view of a diamond cathode for display applications;





FIG. 5

shows the addition of a spacer following deposition of conductive pillars;





FIG. 6

shows a diamond film emission cathode having multiple field emitters for each pixel;





FIG. 7



a


shows a diode biasing circuit;





FIG. 7



b


shows a typical I-V curve for a diode and an operational load-line using an internal pillar resistor of 2.5 Ohms;





FIG. 7



c


shows a timing diagram of the operation of the anode and cathode;





FIG. 8

shows the step of depositing a blanket layer of metal on a silicon substrate and a photoresist layer on the metal layer;





FIG. 9

shows the step of removing any remaining photoresist after etching;





FIG. 10

shows the step of depositing conductive pillars on the layer of metal;





FIG. 11

shows a cross-sectional view of a diamond cathode for display applications;





FIG. 12

shows the step of selectively depositing a phosphorus-doped diamond thin film;





FIG. 13

shows the step of assembling an anode and cathode together;





FIG. 14

shows a multielectrode configuration for triode operation;





FIG. 15

shows a structure of a sensor having a diamond cathode;





FIGS. 16 through 19

show a schematic method to fabricate a three terminal device based on diamond field emitters;





FIGS. 20 through 25

show field emission data taken on a sample deposited at room temperature by laser ablation;





FIGS. 26 through 28

show field emission data taken on a sample formed from methane and hydrogen under conditions of high plasma; and





FIGS. 29



a


,


29




b


,


30




a


,


30




b


,


31




a


,


31




b


,


32




a


and


32




b


show optical and scanning electron microscopic pictures of an actual reductio to practice of a device which results after application of the processing step detailed in FIG.


5


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




Vacuum diodes are fabricated across the expanse of a substrate employing standard fabrication techniques including deposition, masking and etching.




Referring to

FIG. 1

of the drawings, which shows a beginning step, a blanket layer 100 of 5000 Å thick chromium (which can be another metal such as molybdenum (Mo), aluminum (Al), titanium (Ti) or a combination of these) is deposited by conventional deposition technologies such as evaporation, sputtering deposition on the surface of the glass


101


(or other materials such as silicon wafer or alumina). Then a layer of photo resist is applied by spinning on to a thickness of 1 μm to 2 μm and the chromium layer


100


is delineated by mask exposure of the resist layer. The remaining resist layer


100


is a mask to etching of the chromium layer


100


. The function of the chromium layer


100


is to form the addressing lines and the base for field emitters. The dimensions of the addressing line and the base are determined by different applications. For display applications, the pillar size is about 100 μm to 250 μm and the line is about 25 μm. For vacuum microelectronic devices such as high power, high frequency amplifiers, the feature size is reduced to several microns or even smaller. Finally, any remaining resist after etching is removed (see FIG.


2


).





FIG. 3

is the cross sectional view of the next step for fabricating the display. Metal mask deposition technology is used to deposit conductive pillars


300


on top of the bases. The size of the pillars


300


is a little smaller than that of the bases. For example, if the base is 120 μm wide, the optimized size of the pillars is 100 μm wide. This requirement reduces the need for aligning the metal mask


304


to the substrate, resulting in a reduction of manufacturing cost. The height of the pillars


300


is determined by device parameters such as operating voltage, spacer size, gap between cathode and anode, and manufacturing cost. 10 μm high pillars are used here. According to the FN theory of field emission, the emission current is very sensitive to the gap between the cathode and anode and to surface conditions of the cathode. Although using the conventional thin film deposition technologies such as sputtering, evaporation and CVD, the thickness of the thin film cathode can be well controlled within 1%-5% over a large area, the uniformity of the emission current over the large area is still problematic. Assuming 4.5 eV work function of the material and 100 MV/m applied electric field used, a 1% difference in the gap between cathode and anode will cause 10% variations in the emission current. To increase the uniformity of the emission, resistive material is used to build pillars


300


. The function of a resistive material is to adjust the potential across the gap between cathode and anode. The higher the pillar, the larger the resistance the pillar has and the smaller the potential across the gap. So the effect of the difference in the pillar height on the emission current is reduced or eliminated if a suitable resistor material is chosen for the pillars


300


. Another function of the resistive pillars


300


is to act as a current control layer. Due to reasons such as surface conditions including contamination, roughness, and flatness, the emission current from some emitters is much higher than that of others. Due to the existence of the resistive pillar


300


, the potential drop across the pillars which have higher emission current is larger than that of the pillars having smaller emission current. The optimized thickness of the resistive layer 101 in the 10μm high pillars


300


is 5 μm.




Referring still to

FIG. 3

, a 5 μm thick layer


302


of a high thermal conductive material (such as copper) is deposited on the top of the resistive layer


301


through the holes in the metal mask


304


by evaporation. The function of layer


302


is to help the cathode material (here diamond) dissipate the heat generated by the emission current.




In

FIG. 3

, diamond thin film


303


is deposited by room temperature deposition technology such as laser ablation through the holes in the metal mask


304


. The thickness of the diamond


303


is about 1 micron or smaller. The low temperature restriction here is only required for a low cost display which uses regular glass as the substrate.

FIG. 4

is the completed cross section view of the diamond cathode for display applications. Another way to deposit diamond thin film


303


is to use selective diamond CVD deposition technology. After fabricating the pillar


300


, the thin layer of molybdenum (100 Å) is coated on the top surface of the pillar


300


using metal mask deposition technology. Then the diamond thin film


303


is only deposited on the molybdenum surface by selective CVD.




The next step is to fabricate the anode plate


500


(see

FIG. 5

) with an Indium Tin Oxide (“ITO”) layer and phosphors by conventional thin film deposition technologies such as sputtering and evaporation or thick film technology such as screen printing. The substrate is glass. A low energy phosphor film such as zinc oxide (ZnO) is deposited and patterned on the glass with ITO coating. The fabrication process is straightforward, and need not be detailed in this disclosure.




Referring now to

FIG. 5

, an assembly process of a final device is shown. The cylinder shape spacers


501


of insulator are sandwiched between the anode and cathode layer


100


. The thickness of the spacers


501


is 12 μm so that the gap between cathode and anode is 2 μm. The requirements for the spacers


501


are 1) very high breakdown strength, a minimum of 100 MV/m at room temperature; 2) very uniform thickness; 3) low cost; and 4) vacuum compatible. Commercially available fibers are used as the spacers


501


for the display. There are several types of insulating fibers available at this time. The most common are optical glass and plastic fibers, and several fibers used in fiber composites. The diameter of the fiber used is around 12 μm. So the gap in the final device is 2 μm. The spacers


501


are not limited to a cylindrical shape. Furthermore, laminated layer of mica can be used in place of the fiber. The final step of fabricating the diamond flat panel display is vacuum sealing, which is standard technology. A display with a 2 μm gap between cathode and anode is designed to operate at 50-60 volts.




The operating voltage for the display described herein is limited by the threshold energy for the phosphor material. The opening voltage must be larger than the threshold energy of the phosphor. For example, regular ZnO film doped with zinc (Zn) has a threshold energy of 300 eV so that the display using this type of phosphor film needs at least 300 Volts operating voltage. The basic parameters for the display are: 20 μm gap, 10 μm pillar and 30μm spacer. The vacuum requirement is moderate, typically 10


−3


torr.

FIGS. 29-32

show optical and scanning electron microscope pictures of the actual reduction to practice of FIG.


5


.




With reference to

FIG. 6

, multiple field emitters for each pixel are designed to reduce the failure rate for each pixel, and thereby increase the lifetime of the display and manufacturing yield. Since each emitter for the same pixel has an independent resistive layer, the rest of the emitters for the same pixel will continue to emit electrons if one of the emitters on the pixel fails, whether from a short or open.




Referring to FIG.


7


(


a


), a diode biasing circuit


700


and


701


is designed to drive the display with an operating voltage of 300V by using a low voltage semiconductor driver. For full color display, the anode


500


may be patterned in three sets of stripes, each covered with a cathodoluminescent material. However, for simplicity of discussion, only one line on the anode is shown in FIG.


7


(


a


). On the cathode plate, the pixels are addressed by an addressing line which is orthogonal to the line on the anode plate


500


. The cathode is addressed by a 25 volt driver


701


and the anode


500


is addressed by another 25 volt driver


700


floating on a DC power supply. The output voltage from the DC power supply is chosen to be just below the threshold voltage of the display. For example, for a display with a threshold voltage of 300V, a 250 volt DC power supply is used. By sequential addressing of these electrodes a color image can be displayed. FIG.


7


(


b


) shows a typical current-voltage (I-V) curve for a diode and an operational load-line using an internal pillar resistor of 2.5 GΩ. FIG.


7


(


c


) depicts the typical application of the anode and cathode voltages and the resulting anode/cathode potential.




There are several ways to fabricate diamond films. Following is a discussion of two different methods. The first method of depositing diamond and diamond-like carbon films is by laser ablation using a Nd:YAG laser bombarding a graphite target. The process has been described in detail elsewhere. FIG.


20


through

FIG. 25

show field emission data taken on a sample deposited at room temperature by laser ablation. This data was taken by a tungsten carbide ball held a few microns from the film, varying the voltage applied between the ball and the sample.




The other method of diamond fabrication is by chemical vapor deposition (CVD). In this case the diamond is formed from methane and hydrogen at very high temperature (400-1000° C.) under conditions of high plasma. The data from such a sample is shown in

FIGS. 26 through 28

.





FIGS. 16 through 19

show a schematic method to fabricate a three terminal device based on diamond field emitters.




Following are variations on the basic scheme:




1) Resistors under each pixel.




2) Multiple emitters for each pixel. Independent resistors make this very useful.




3) Multiple spacers. There can be two rows of fibers: one aligned with the x-axis, and the other aligned with the y-axis. This will increase the breakdown voltage of the structure.




4) Methods for gray scale FPD. There are two methods for a diode type display. In the first case, the driver changes the voltage applied to the diode in an analog fashion, thereby changing the emission current resulting in various shades of gray. In the second approach, each of the 16 (or a similar number) emitter pillars of each pixel is individually addressed. In this way the current reaching the phosphor can be varied.




5) Even though all the structures shown herein use diamond field emitters, any other low electron affinity material may be used as well. These include various cermet and oxides and borides.




6) Conditioning. All diamond samples need to be conditioned at the beginning of field emission. This involves application of a higher voltage which conditions the emitter surface. After initial conditioning, the threshold voltage for the emitter drops drastically and the emitter operates at that voltage. There may be other methods of conditioning such as thermal activation or photo-conditioning. The displays may require periodic conditioning which may be programmed in such a way that the whole display is conditioned whenever the display is turned on.




There are other applications for diamond cathode field emitters, namely diamond cathodes for a vacuum valve. The structure of micron or submicron vacuum microelectronics with a diamond thin film cathode will be described.




There are many applications of vacuum microelectronics, but they all rely on the distinctive properties of field emitting devices. Vacuum valves do still exist and a great deal of effort has, for many years, been directed towards finding a cold electron source to replace the thermionic cathode in such devices as cathode ray tubes, traveling wave tubes and a range of other microwave power amplifiers. This search has focused particularly on faster start-up, higher current density and lower heater power. Field emission cathodes offer the promise of improvements in all three, resulting in increased operating power and greater efficiency. For example, the high power pulse amplifier used as a beacon on a transmitter for air traffic control has a 6 mm diameter thermionic cathode giving a beam diameter of 3 mm and is capable of a maximum current density of 4 A/cm


2


. The field emission diode required to obtain an equivalent current would be less than 0.05 mm in diameter. It is clear, however, that if this diode were used in such a traveling wave tube, provisions would have to be made to avoid back bombardment of emitting tips by energetic ions. There has also been growing concern over the ability of solid state electronics to survive in space and over defense systems where they are exposed to both ionizing and electromagnetic radiation. Most semiconductor devices rely on low voltage transport of low density electron gas. When exposed to ionizing radiation, they are bombarded by both neutral and charged particles, which causes both excitation of carriers, changing this density, and trapping of charge at insulator interfaces, leading to significant shifts in bias voltage. The result may be transient upset, or permanent damage if the shifted characteristic leads to runaway currents. The most sensitive insulator involved in a vacuum device is the vacuum itself which will not be permanently damaged by radiation or current overloading.




In addition, the speed of a semiconductor device is ultimately limited by the time taken for an electron to travel from the source to the drain. The transit time is determined by impurity and phono collisions within the lattice of the solid, which lead to electron velocity saturation at about the speed of sound. Vacuum valves, however, operate by electrons passing from cathode to-anode within a vacuum and their passage is therefore unimpaired by molecular collisions. With typical voltages (100V) and dimensions (1 μm), transit times of less than 1 picosecond can be expected.




Thus, there is a need for a structure of related field emission devices for different applications and a method of making.




Vacuum diodes are fabricated by semiconductor style fabrication technology, allowing micron or submicron dimensional control.




Similar to

FIG. 1

,

FIG. 8

shows a beginning step for submicron or micron vacuum valves. A blank layer 800 of 500 Å thick Al (which can be another metal) is deposited by conventional deposition technologies such as evaporation or sputtering on a silicon wafer


801


. In

FIG. 9

, a layer


802


of photo resist is applied by spinning on to a thickness of 1 μm to 2 μm and a chromium layer is delineated by mask exposure to the resist layer. The remaining resist layer is a mask to etching to the Al layer


800


. The functions of the Al layer


800


are addressing lines and the base for the field emitter. The dimensions of the addressing line and the base are determined by the different applications. For submicron vacuum values applications, the pillar size is about 1 μm to 2 μm or even less and the line is about 0.1 μm. Finally, the remaining resist on the addressing line is removed by using a second mask and etching process.





FIG. 10

is the cross sectional view of the next step for fabricating submicron vacuum valves. An SiO


2


layer


1000


of thickness of 1 μm is deposited by thermal Chemical Vapor Deposition (“CVD”) on the substrate. Then in

FIG. 11

the remaining resist


802


on the pillar is removed by etching process.

FIG. 11

is the cross sectional view of the structure at the second stage.




For the same reasons discussed before, the resistive layer is introduced between the cathode layer (diamond thin film) and the base layer (Al layer). In this disclosure, we use diamond as the cathode material as well as resistive material. The wide energy gap of diamond (5.45 eV) at room temperature is responsible for the high breakdown field of diamond and excellent insulation. It also provides the opportunity to fabricate the diamond thin film with a wide range of resistivity. The closer the doping level to the conductance band or valence band, the lower the resistivity the film has. Attempts to dope diamonds by admixing PH3 were partially successful. Activation energies in the range 0.84-1.15 eV were obtained. Hall effect measurements indicate that phosphorus doped samples have n-type conductivity. Although the resistivity of phosphorous doped films is usually too high for electronic applications, it fits for the resistive layer in the vacuum microelectronics. Sodium (Na) is a potential shallow donor and occupies the tetrahedrally interstitial site. The formation energy for sodium is about 16.6 eV with respect to experimental cohesive energies of bulk Na. As a result the solubility of sodium in diamond is quite low and the doping is performed by ion implantation or some other ion beam technology.




Referring to

FIG. 12

, phosphorus doped diamond thin film


1200


is selectively deposited by plasma CVD technology on the base layer


800


. The system used for diamond deposition has an extra gas inlet for doping gas and an ion beam for sodium doping. At first, the ion beam is standby and the gas inlet for PH3 is open. The donor concentration in the diamond is controlled by the flow rate of PH3. The phosphorus concentration in diamond can be varied in the range 0.01-1 wt % depending on the device parameters. The thickness of the phosphorus-doped diamond thin film


1200


is 0.5 μm. After the thickness of phosphorus-doped diamond thin film


1200


reaches the desired value, the PH3 gas line shuts off and the ion beam for sodium starts to dope the sodium while plasma CBD deposition of diamond thin film


1201


is continuous. The thickness of heavy-doped n-diamond thin film


1201


with a sodium donor is about 100 Å. The difference between the thickness of SiO


2




1000


and the diamond thin film


1201


is about 0.5 μm.




Referring now to

FIG. 13

, the silicon wafer


1300


with metallization layer


1301


is fabricated by standard semiconductor technology as an anode plate and both substrates, anode and cathode, are assembled together. The assembly is pumped down to a certain pressure (for example 10−3 torr) and sealed with vacuum compatible adhesive. The pressure inside the devices is determined by the geometry of the devices and the operating voltage. If the operating voltage is lower than the ionization potential which is less than 10 Volts and the gap between the cathode and anode is less than electron mean free path at atmosphere (0.5 μm), the procedure for vacuum sealing the device can be eliminated. Otherwise, the pressure inside the device should be kept at 10


−3


torr.




Following is a description for diamond coating for a microtip type vacuum triode.





FIG. 14

shows a multielectrode configuration for triode operation. The detail of the structure and fabrication process have been well known for many years. For purposes of the present invention the well-known process to fabricate the microtips and coat the tips with diamond thin film


1400


of 100 Å thickness by using selective CVD deposition is followed. The diamond coating results in the reduction of the operating voltage from 135 volts to 15 volts since the threshold electric field for diamond is much lower than that for any refractory metal.





FIG. 15

shows the structure of a sensor with a diamond cathode. The fabrication process is similar to that for vacuum diodes. The only difference is the anode plate


1500


. The anode plate


1500


, made of a very thin silicon membrane, is deflected by any applied pressure or force, which changes the distance between the anode and the cathode, thereby changing the current which can be measured.




Although direct competition between silicon semiconductor electronics and vacuum electronics based on the field emission cathode is unlikely, the two technologies are not incompatible. It is therefore conceivable that electronic systems incorporating both semiconductor and vacuum devices, possibly even on the same chip, will be possible. Such a hybrid could exploit the high speed of vacuum transport.




In the same chip, solid state devices are made of silicon and vacuum electronics based on non-silicon cathode material. The fabrication process for hybrid chips is very high cost and complicated since two types of the basic material are used and different processes are involved. Diamond possesses a unique combination of desirable properties which make it attractive for a variety of electronics. With the present invention, a chip based on diamond solid state electronics and diamond vacuum electronics is fabricated.




Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method of making a field emission cathode, comprising the steps of:depositing a layer of conductive material over a first substrate; depositing an electrically resistive pillar over said layer of conductive material, said electrically resistive pillar having a substantially flat surface spaced from and substantially parallel to said first substrate; depositing a layer of cathode material over said surface of said electrically resistive pillar, said layer of cathode material having a substantially flat exposed surface spaced from and substantially parallel to said first substrate; constructing a plurality of field emission cathodes over said layer of conductive material, said field emission cathodes having interstices therebetween to produce thereby a cathode assembly; depositing a spacer material in said interstices; depositing an indium tin oxide layer over a second substrate; depositing a phosphor film layer over said indium tin oxide layer to produce thereby an anode assembly; and joining said cathode assembly to said anode assembly, said spacer material thereby contacting said phosphor film layer.
  • 2. A method of making a field emission cathode, comprising the steps of:depositing a layer of conductive material over a substrate; depositing an electrically resistive pillar over said layer of conductive material, said electrically resistive pillar having a substantially flat surface spaced from and substantially parallel to said substrate; depositing a layer of cathode material over said surface of said electrically resistive pillar, said layer of cathode material having a substantially flat exposed surface spaced from and substantially parallel to said substrate; constructing a plurality of field emission cathodes over said layer of conductive material, said field emission cathodes having interstices therebetween to produce thereby a cathode assembly; and depositing a spacer material in said interstices, wherein said spacer material is fibrous.
  • 3. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said second substrate is glass.
  • 4. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said joined cathode and anode assemblies form a portion of a flat panel display.
  • 5. The method as recited in claim 4 wherein said joined cathode and anode assemblies are separated by an electrical potential provided by a diode biasing circuit.
Parent Case Info

This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/326,302 filed Oct. 19, 1994, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,551,903, which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 08/300,771 filed Jun. 20, 1994, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 07/851,701 filed Mar. 16, 1992, abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (229)
Number Name Date Kind
1954691 de Boer et al. Apr 1934 A
2851408 Cerulli et al. Sep 1958 A
2867541 Coghill et al. Jan 1959 A
2959483 Kaplan Nov 1960 A
3070441 Schwartz Dec 1962 A
3108904 Cusano Oct 1963 A
3259782 Shroff Jul 1966 A
3314871 Heck et al. Apr 1967 A
3360450 Hays Dec 1967 A
3481733 Evans Dec 1969 A
3525679 Wilcox et al. Aug 1970 A
3554889 Hyman et al. Jan 1971 A
3665241 Spindt et al. May 1972 A
3675063 Spindt et al. Jul 1972 A
3755704 Spindt et al. Aug 1973 A
3789471 Spindt et al. Feb 1974 A
3808048 Strik Apr 1974 A
3812559 Spindt et al. May 1974 A
3855499 Yamada et al. Dec 1974 A
3898146 Rehkopf et al. Aug 1975 A
3947716 Fraser, Jr. et al. Mar 1976 A
3970887 Smith et al. Jul 1976 A
3998678 Fukase et al. Dec 1976 A
4008412 Yuito et al. Feb 1977 A
4075535 Genequand et al. Feb 1978 A
4084942 Villalobos Apr 1978 A
4139773 Swanson Feb 1979 A
4141405 Spindt Feb 1979 A
4143292 Hosoki et al. Mar 1979 A
4164680 Villalobos Aug 1979 A
4168213 Hoeberechts Sep 1979 A
4178531 Alig Dec 1979 A
4183125 Meyer et al. Jan 1980 A
4307507 Gray et al. Dec 1981 A
4350926 Shelton Sep 1982 A
4482447 Mizuguchi et al. Nov 1984 A
4498952 Christensen Feb 1985 A
4507562 Gasiot et al. Mar 1985 A
4512912 Matsuda et al. Apr 1985 A
4513308 Greene et al. Apr 1985 A
4540983 Morimoto et al. Sep 1985 A
4542038 Odaka et al. Sep 1985 A
4578614 Gray et al. Mar 1986 A
4588921 Tischer May 1986 A
4594527 Genevese Jun 1986 A
4633131 Khurgin Dec 1986 A
4647400 Dubroca et al. Mar 1987 A
4663559 Christensen May 1987 A
4684353 deSouza Aug 1987 A
4684540 Schulze Aug 1987 A
4685996 Busta et al. Aug 1987 A
4687825 Sagou et al. Aug 1987 A
4687938 Tamura et al. Aug 1987 A
4710765 Ohkoshi et al. Dec 1987 A
4721885 Brodie Jan 1988 A
4728851 Lambe Mar 1988 A
4758449 Kimura et al. Jul 1988 A
4763187 Biberian Aug 1988 A
4780684 Kosmahl Oct 1988 A
4788472 Katakami Nov 1988 A
4816717 Harper et al. Mar 1989 A
4818914 Brodie Apr 1989 A
4822466 Rabalais et al. Apr 1989 A
4827177 Lee et al. May 1989 A
4835438 Baptist et al. May 1989 A
4851254 Yamamoto et al. Jul 1989 A
4855636 Busta et al. Aug 1989 A
4857161 Borel et al. Aug 1989 A
4857799 Spindt et al. Aug 1989 A
4874981 Spindt Oct 1989 A
4882659 Gloudemans Nov 1989 A
4889690 Opitz et al. Dec 1989 A
4892757 Kasenga et al. Jan 1990 A
4899081 Kishino et al. Feb 1990 A
4900584 Tuenge et al. Feb 1990 A
4908539 Meyer Mar 1990 A
4923421 Brodie et al. May 1990 A
4926056 Spindt May 1990 A
4933108 Soredal Jun 1990 A
4940916 Borel et al. Jul 1990 A
4943343 Bardai et al. Jul 1990 A
4956202 Kasenga et al. Sep 1990 A
4956574 Kane Sep 1990 A
4964946 Gray et al. Oct 1990 A
4987007 Wagal et al. Jan 1991 A
4990416 Mooney Feb 1991 A
4990766 Simms et al. Feb 1991 A
4994205 Bryan et al. Feb 1991 A
5007873 Goronkin et al. Apr 1991 A
5015912 Spindt et al. May 1991 A
5019003 Chason May 1991 A
5036247 Watanabe et al. Jul 1991 A
5038070 Bardai et al. Aug 1991 A
5043715 Kun et al. Aug 1991 A
5054046 Shoulders Oct 1991 A
5054047 Shoulders Oct 1991 A
5055077 Kane Oct 1991 A
5055744 Tsuruoka Oct 1991 A
5057047 Greene et al. Oct 1991 A
5063323 Longo et al. Nov 1991 A
5063327 Brodie et al. Nov 1991 A
5064396 Spindt Nov 1991 A
5066883 Yoshioka et al. Nov 1991 A
5075591 Holmberg Dec 1991 A
5075595 Kane Dec 1991 A
5075596 Young et al. Dec 1991 A
5079476 Kane Jan 1992 A
5085958 Jeong Feb 1992 A
5089292 MaCaulay et al. Feb 1992 A
5089742 Kirkpatrick et al. Feb 1992 A
5089812 Fuse Feb 1992 A
5090932 Dieumegard et al. Feb 1992 A
5098737 Collins et al. Mar 1992 A
5101137 Kun et al. Mar 1992 A
5101288 Ohta et al. Mar 1992 A
5103144 Dunham Apr 1992 A
5103145 Doran Apr 1992 A
5117267 Kimoto et al. May 1992 A
5117299 Kondo et al. May 1992 A
5119386 Narusawa Jun 1992 A
5123039 Shoulders Jun 1992 A
5124072 Dole et al. Jun 1992 A
5124558 Soltani et al. Jun 1992 A
5126287 Jones Jun 1992 A
5129850 Kane et al. Jul 1992 A
5132585 Kane et al. Jul 1992 A
5132676 Kimura et al. Jul 1992 A
5136764 Vasquez Aug 1992 A
5138237 Kane et al. Aug 1992 A
5140219 Kane Aug 1992 A
5141459 Zimmerman Aug 1992 A
5141460 Jaskie et al. Aug 1992 A
5142184 Kane Aug 1992 A
5142256 Kane Aug 1992 A
5142390 Ohta et al. Aug 1992 A
5144191 Jones et al. Sep 1992 A
5148078 Kane Sep 1992 A
5148461 Shoulders Sep 1992 A
5150011 Fujieda Sep 1992 A
5150192 Greene et al. Sep 1992 A
5151061 Sandhu Sep 1992 A
5153753 Ohta et al. Oct 1992 A
5153901 Shoulders Oct 1992 A
5155420 Smith Oct 1992 A
5156770 Wetzel et al. Oct 1992 A
5157304 Kane et al. Oct 1992 A
5157309 Parker et al. Oct 1992 A
5162704 Kobori et al. Nov 1992 A
5166456 Yoshino Nov 1992 A
5173634 Kane Dec 1992 A
5173635 Kane Dec 1992 A
5173697 Smith et al. Dec 1992 A
5180951 Dworsky et al. Jan 1993 A
5183529 Potter et al. Feb 1993 A
5185178 Koskenmaki Feb 1993 A
5186670 Doan et al. Feb 1993 A
5187578 Kohgami et al. Feb 1993 A
5191217 Kane et al. Mar 1993 A
5192240 Komatsu Mar 1993 A
5194780 Meyer Mar 1993 A
5199917 MacDonald et al. Apr 1993 A
5199918 Kumar Apr 1993 A
5201992 Andreadakis et al. Apr 1993 A
5202571 Hinabayashi et al. Apr 1993 A
5203731 Zimmerman Apr 1993 A
5204021 Dole Apr 1993 A
5204581 Andreadakis et al. Apr 1993 A
5205770 Lowrey et al. Apr 1993 A
5209687 Konishi May 1993 A
5210430 Taniguchi et al. May 1993 A
5210462 Konishi May 1993 A
5212426 Kane May 1993 A
5213712 Dole May 1993 A
5214346 Komatsu May 1993 A
5214347 Gray May 1993 A
5214416 Kondo et al. May 1993 A
5220725 Chan et al. Jun 1993 A
5227699 Busta Jul 1993 A
5228877 Allaway et al. Jul 1993 A
5228878 Komatsu Jul 1993 A
5229331 Doan et al. Jul 1993 A
5229682 Komatsu Jul 1993 A
5231606 Gray Jul 1993 A
5232549 Cathey et al. Aug 1993 A
5233263 Cronin et al. Aug 1993 A
5235244 Spindt Aug 1993 A
5236545 Pryor Aug 1993 A
5242620 Dole et al. Sep 1993 A
5243252 Kaneko et al. Sep 1993 A
5250451 Chouan Oct 1993 A
5252833 Kane et al. Oct 1993 A
5256888 Kane Oct 1993 A
5259799 Doan et al. Nov 1993 A
5262698 Dunham Nov 1993 A
5266155 Gray Nov 1993 A
5275967 Taniguchi et al. Jan 1994 A
5276521 Mori Jan 1994 A
5277638 Lee Jan 1994 A
5278475 Jaskie et al. Jan 1994 A
5281890 Kane Jan 1994 A
5281891 Kaneko et al. Jan 1994 A
5283500 Kochanski Feb 1994 A
5285129 Takeda et al. Feb 1994 A
5296117 De Jaeger et al. Mar 1994 A
5300862 Parker et al. Apr 1994 A
5302423 Tran et al. Apr 1994 A
5308439 Cronin et al. May 1994 A
5312514 Kumar May 1994 A
5312777 Cronin et al. May 1994 A
5315393 Mican May 1994 A
5329207 Cathey et al. Jul 1994 A
5330879 Dennison Jul 1994 A
5341063 Kumar Aug 1994 A
5347201 Liang et al. Sep 1994 A
5347292 Ge et al. Sep 1994 A
5357172 Lee et al. Oct 1994 A
5368681 Hiraoka et al. Nov 1994 A
5378963 Ikeda Jan 1995 A
5380546 Krishnan et al. Jan 1995 A
5387844 Browning Feb 1995 A
5393647 Neukermans et al. Feb 1995 A
5396150 Wu et al. Mar 1995 A
5399238 Kumar Mar 1995 A
5401676 Lee Mar 1995 A
5402041 Kishino et al. Mar 1995 A
5404070 Tsai et al. Apr 1995 A
5408161 Kishino et al. Apr 1995 A
5410218 Hush Apr 1995 A
5412285 Komatsu May 1995 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (27)
Number Date Country
88 07288 Dec 1989 FR
57-141480 Sep 1982 JP
57-141482 Sep 1982 JP
58-102444 Jun 1983 JP
58-164133 Sep 1983 JP
59-075547 Apr 1984 JP
59-075548 Apr 1984 JP
59-209249 Nov 1984 JP
60-009039 Jan 1985 JP
60-049553 Mar 1985 JP
60-115682 Jun 1985 JP
62-027486 Feb 1987 JP
62-121783 Jun 1987 JP
63-251491 Oct 1988 JP
64-043595 Feb 1989 JP
3-119640 May 1991 JP
3-127431 May 1991 JP
3-137190 Jun 1991 JP
4-202493 Jul 1992 JP
4-227678 Aug 1992 JP
4-227785 Aug 1992 JP
4-230996 Aug 1992 JP
4-233991 Aug 1992 JP
4-270783 Sep 1992 JP
5-065478 Mar 1993 JP
5-117653 May 1993 JP
5-117655 May 1993 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (114)
Entry
Himpsel et al. “Quantum photoyield of Diamond (III)-A stable negative affinity emitter” Phys. Rev. B. 20 pp 624-627 (1979).*
Xu et al. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys., pp 1776-1780 (1993).*
Kang et al., Application of Diamond Films and Related Materials Third International Conference. pp 37-40 (1995).*
Ralchenko et al “A Technique for Controllable Seeding of Ultrafine Diamond Particles for Growth and Selective-Area Deposition of Diamond Films,” 2nd International Conference on the Applications of Diamond Films and Related Materials, 1993, pp. 475-480.
van der Weide et al “Angle-resolved photoemission of diamond (111) and (100) surfaces; negative electron affinity and band structure measurements,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 12, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 1994, pp. 2475-2479.
van der Weide et al. “Argon and hydrogen plasma interactions on diamond (111) surfaces: Electronic states and structure,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 62, No. 16, Apr. 19, 1993, pp. 1878-1880.
Geis et al “Capacitance-Voltage Measurements on Metal-SiO2-Diamond Structures Fabricated with (100)-0 and (111)-Oriented Substrates,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 38, No. 3, Mar. 1991, pp. 619-626.
Robertson “Deposition of diamond-like carbon,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Land. A, vol. 342, 1993, pp. 277-286.
Geis et al “Diamond Field-Emission Cathodes,” Conference Record—1994 Tri-Service/NASA Cathode Workshop, Cleveland, Ohio, Mar. 29-31, 1994.
Twichell “Diamond Field-Emission Cathode Technology,” Lincoln Laboratory @ MIT.
Nistor et al “Direct Observation of Laser-Induced Crystallization of a-C:H Films,” Appl. Phys. A, vol. 58, 1994, pp. 137-144.
“Electrical characterization of gridded field emission arrays,” Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 99: Section 4 Presented at 2nd Int. Conf. on Vac. Microelectron., Bath, 1989, pp. 81-84.
“Electrical phenomena occuring at the surface of electrically stressed metal cathodes. I. Electroluminescence and breakdown phenomena with medium gap spacings (2-8 mm),” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., vol. 12, 1979, pp. 2229-2245.
Okano et al “Electron emission from phosphorus- and boron-doped polycrystalline diamond films,” Electronics Letters, vol. 31, No. 1, Jan. 1995, pp. 74-75.
Xu et al. “Field-dependence of the Area-Density of ‘Cold’ Electron Emission Sites on Broad-Area CVD Diamond Films,” Electronics Letters, vol. 29, No. 18, Sep. 2, 1993, pp. 1596-1597.
Pimenov et al. “Laser-Assisted Selective Area Metallization of Diamond Surface by Electroless Nickel Plating,” 2nd International Conference on the Applications of Diamond Films and Related Materials, 1993, p. 303-306.
Huang et al. “Monte Carlo Simulation of Ballistic Charge Transport in Diamond under an Internal Electric Field,” Dept. of Physics, The Penn. State Univ., University Park, PA, Mar. 3, 1995.
Tasaka et al “Optical obvervation of plumes formed at laser ablation of carbon materials,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 79/80, 1994, pp. 141-145.
Yu et al “Optical Recording in Diamond-Like Carbon Films,” JJAP Series 6, Proc. Int. Symp. on Optical Memory, 1991, pp. 116-120.
Wang et al. “Real-time, in situ photoelectron emission microscopy observation of CVD diamond oxidation and dissolution on molybdenum,” Diamond and Related Materials, vol. 3, 1994, 1994, pp. 1066-1071.
Spindt et al “Recent Progress in Low-Voltage Field-Emission Cathode Development,” Journal de Physique, Colloque C9, supp. au no. 12, Tome 45, Dec. 12984, pp. C9-269-278.
Py et al “Stability of the emission of a microtip,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 12, No. 2, Mar./Apr. 1994, pp. 685-688.
Avakyan et al. “Angular Characteristics of the Radiation by Ultra Relativistic Electrons in Thick Diamond Single Crystals,” Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett., vol. 11, No. 11, Nov. 1985, pp. 574-575.
Bajic et al. “Enhanced cold-cathode emission using composite resin-carbon coatings,” Dept. of Electronic Eng. & Applied Physics, Aston Univ., Aston Triangle, Birmingham, UK, May 29, 1987.
Bajic et al. “Enhanced Cold-Cathode Emission Using Composite Resin-Carbon Coatings,” Dept. of Electronic Eng. & Applied Phiscs, Aston Univ., Aston Triangle, Birmingham, UK, May 29, 1987.
Banks “Topography: Texturing Effects,” Handbook of Ion Beam Processing Technology, Chapter 17, pp. 338-361.
C. Xie “Field Emission Characteristic Requirements for Field Emission Displays,” Conf. of 1994 Int. Display Research Conf. and Int. Workshops on Active-Matrix LCDs & Display Mat'ls, Oct. 1994.
Chen “Optical Emission Diagnostics of Laser-Induced Plasma for Diamond-like Film Deposition,” Applied Physics A—Solids and Surfaces, vol. 52, 1991, pp. 328-334.
Chen and Mazumder “Emission spectroscopy during excimer laser ablation of graphite,” Appl. Phys. Letters, vol. 57, No. 21, Nov. 19, 1990, pp. 2178-2180.
Chenggang Xie, et al. “Electron Field Emission from Amorphic Diamond Thin Films,” 6th International Vacuum Microelectronics Conference Technical Digest, 1993, pp. 162-163.
ChenggangXie et al. “Use of Diamond Thin Films for Low Cost field Emissions Displays,” 7th International Vacuum Microelectronics Conference Technical Digest, 1994, pp. 229-232.
Collins et al “Laser plasma source of amorphic diamond,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 54, No. 3, Jan. 16, 1989, pp. 216-218.
Collins et al. “The bonding of protective films of amorphic diamond to titanium,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 71, No. 7, Apr. 1, 1992, pp. 3260-3265.
Collins et al. “Microstructure of Amorphic Diamond Films,” The Univ. of Texas at Dallas, Center for Quantum Electronics, Richardson, Texas.
Collins et al. “Thin-Film Diamond,” The Texas Journal of Science, vol. 41, No. 4, 1989, pp. 343-358.
Data Sheet on Display Driver, HV38, Supertex, Inc., pp. 11-43 to 11-50.
Data Sheet on Voltage Drive, HV 622, Supertex Inc., pp. 1-5, Sep. 22, 1992.
Data Sheet on Voltage Driver, HV620, Supertex Inc., pp. 1-6, May 21, 1993.
Data Sheet on Anode Drive SN755769, Texas Instruments, pp. 4-81 to 4-88.
Davanloo et al. “Amorphic diamond films produced by a laser plasma source,” J. Appl. Physics, vol. 67, No. 4, Feb. 15, 1990, pp. 2081-2087.
Djuba et al. “Emission Properties of Spindt-Type Cold Cathodes with Different Emission Cone Material”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 38, No. 10, Oct. 1991.
Fink et al. “Optimization of Amorphic Diamond™ for Diode Field Emission Displays,” Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation and SI Diamond Technology, Inc.
Geis et al. “Diamond Cold Cathode,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 12, No. 8, Aug. 1991, pp. 456-459.
Ghis et al. “Sealed Vacuum Devices: Microchips Fluorescent Display,” 3rd International Vacuum Microelectronics Conference, Monterrey, U.S.A., Jul. 1990 [copy to be provided].
Gorbunov “Spatial characteristics of laser pulsed plasma deposition of thin films,” SPIE, vol. 1352, Laser Surface Microprocessing, 1989, pp. 95-99.
Hastie, et al. “Thermochemistry of materials by laser vaporization mass spectrometry: 2. Graphite,” High Temperatures—High Pressures, vol. 20, 1988, pp. 73-89.
Hastie et al. “High Temperature Chemistry in Laser Plumes,” John L. Margrave Research Symposium, Rice University, Apr. 29, 1994.
Kumar et al “Diamond-based field emission flat panel displays,” Solid State Technology, May 1995, pp. 71-74.
Kurnar et al. “Field Emission Displays Based on Diamond Thin Films,” Society of Information Display Conference Technical Digest, 1993, pp. 1009-1010.
Kurnar et al. “Development of Nano-Crystaline Diamond-Based Field-Emission Displays,” Society of Information Display SID 94Digest, 1994, pp. 43-45.
Marquardt et al. “Deposition of Amorphous Carbon Films from Laser-Produced Plasmas,” Mat. Res. Soc. Sump. Proc., vol. 38, 1985, pp. 326-335.
Muller, et al. “A Comparative Study of Deposition of Thin Films by Laser Induced PVD with Femtosecond and Nanosecond Laser Pulses,” SPIE, vol. 1858, 1993, pp. 464-475.
N. Puperter et al. “Field Emission Measurements withμm Resolution on CVD-Polycrystalline Diamond Films,” To be published and presented at the 8th IVMC '95, Portland, Oregon.
Noer “Electron Field Emission from Broad-Area Electrodes,” Applied Physics A—Solids and Surfaces, vol. 28, 1982, pp. 1-24.
Pappas, et al “Characterization of laser vaporization plasmas generated for the deposition of diamond-like carbon,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 72, No. 9, Nov. 1, 1992, pp. 3966-3970.
Schenck, et al. “Optical characterization of thin film laser deposition processes,” SPIE, vol. 1594, Process Module Metrology, Control, and Clustering, 1991, pp. 411-417.
Shovlin et al. “Synchrotron radiation photoelectron emission microscopy of chemical-vapor-deposited diamond electron emitters,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, vol. 13, No. 3, May/Jun. 1995, pp. 1-5.
Spindt et al. “Physical properties of thin film field emission cathodes with molybdenum cones,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 47, No. 12, 1976, pp. 5248-5263.
Tzeng et al. “Diamond Cold Cathodes: Applications of Diamond Films and Related Materials,” Elsevier Science Publishers BN, 1991, pp. 309-310 [copy to be provided].
van der Weide et al. “Schottky barrier height and negative electron affinity of titanium on (111) diamond,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 10, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 1992, pp. 1940-1943.
Wagal, et al. “Diamond-like carbon films prepared with a laser ion source,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 53, No. 3, Jul. 18, 1988, pp. 187-188.
Wang, et al. “Cold Field Emission From CVD Diamond Films Observed in Emission Electron Microscopy,”-Electronics Letters, vol. 27, pp 1459-1461, Jun. 10, 1991.
Warren “Control of silicon field emitter shape with isotrophically etched oxide masks,” Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 99: Section 2, Presented at 2nd Int. Conf. on Vac. Microelectron., Bath, 1989, pp. 37-40.
Wehner “Cone formation as a result of whisker growth on ion bombarded metal surfaces,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, vol. 3, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 1985, pp. 1821-1834.
Wehner et al. “Cone Formation on Metal Targets During Sputtering,” J. Appl. Physics, vol. 42, No. 3, Mar. 1, 1971, p. 1145-1149.
Xu et al “Characterisation of the Field Emitting Properties of CVD Diamond Films,” Conference Record—1994 Tri-Service/NASA Cathode Workshop, Cleveland, Ohio, Mar. 29-31, 1994, pp. 91-94.
“Method of Making Field Emission Tips Using Physical Vapor Deposition of Random Nuclei as Etch Mask,” Ser. No. 08/232,790 filed Apr. 22, 1994.
“Method of Making Field Emission Tips Using Physical Vapor Deposition of Random Nuclei as Etch Mask,” International Application No. PCT/US94/04568 filed Apr. 22, 1994.
“Flat Panel Display Based On Diamond Thin Films,” Ser. No. 08/300,771, filed Jun. 20, 1994.
“Amorphic Diamond Film Flat Field Emission Cathode,” Ser. No. 08/071,157 filed Jun. 2, 1993.
“Diode Structure Flat Panel,”0 Ser. No. 07/995,846 filed Dec. 23, 1992.
“Triode Structure Flat Panel Display Employing Flat Field Emission Cathodes,” Ser. No. 07/993,863 filed Dec. 23, 1992.
“Triode Structure Flat Panel Display Employing Flat Field Emission Cathodes,” Ser. No. 08/458,854 filed Jun. 2, 1995.
“Methods for Fabricating Flat Panel Display Systems and Components,” Ser. No. 08/147,700 filed Nov. 4, 1993.
“System and Method for Achieving Uniform Screen Brightness Within a Matrix Display,” Ser. No. 08/292,135 filed Aug. 17, 1994.
“Method for Producing Thin, Uniform Powder Phosphor for Display Screens,” Ser. No. 08/304,918 filed Sep. 13, 1994.
“Method of Making a Field Emission Electron Source with Random Micro-tip Structures,” Ser. No. 08/427,464 filed Apr. 24, 1995.
“Flat Panel Display Based on Diamond Thin Films,” Ser. No. 08/326,302 filed Nov. 19, 1994.
“System and Method for Depositing a Diamond-like Film on a Substrate,” Ser. No. 08/320,626 filed Nov. 7, 1994.
“Electrochemical Doping of Phosphors Via Codeposition with Inorganic Cations,” Ser. No. 08/382,319 filed Feb. 1, 1995.
“A Field Emission Display Device,” Ser. No. 08/456,453 filed Jun. 1, 1995.
“Pretreatment Process for a Surface Texturing Process,” Ser. No. 08/427,462 filed Apr. 24, 1995.
“Field Emitter with Wide Band Gap Emission,” Ser. No. 08/264,386 filed Jun. 23, 1994.
“A Method of Making a Field Emitter,” Ser. No. 08/457,962 filed Jun. 01, 1995.
“Cone Formation as a Result of Whisker Growth on Ion Bombarded Metal Surfaces,” G.K. Wehner, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 3(4), Jul./Aug. 1985, pp. 1821-1834.
“Cone Formation on Metal Targets During Sputtering,” G.K. Wehner and D.J. Hajicek, J. Appl. Physics, vol. 42, No. 3, Mar. 1, 1971, pp. 1145-1149.
“Physical Properties of Thin Film Field Emission Cathodes,” C.A. Spindt, et al, J. Appl. Phys.,, vol. 47, 1976, p. 5248-63.
“Topography: Texturing Effects,” Bruce A. Banks, Handbook of Ion Beam Processing Technology, No. 17, pp. 338-361.
“A Comparative Study of Deposition of Thin Films by Laser Induced PVD with Femtosecond and Nanosecond Laser Pulses,” Muller, et al, SPIE, vol. 1858 (1993), pp. 464-475.
“Amorphic Diamond Films Produced by a Laser Plasma Source,” Davanloo et al., Journal Appl. Physics, vol. 67, No. 4, Feb. 15, 1990, pp. 2081-2087.
“Characterization of Laser Vaporization Plasmas Generated for the Deposition of Diamond-Like Carbon,” Pappas, et al., J. Appl. Phys., vol. 72, No. 9, Nov. 1, 1992, pp. 3966-3970.
“Deposition of Amorphous Carbon Films from Laser-Produced Plasmas,” Marquardt, et al, Mat. Res. Soc. Sump. Proc., vol. 38, (1985), pp. 326-335.
“Development of Nano-Crystaline Diamond-Based Field-Emission Displays,” Kurnar et al., Society of Information Display Conference Technical Digest, 1994, pp. 43-45.
“Diamond-like Carbon Films Prepared with a Laser Ion Source,” Wagal, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 53, No. 3, Jul. 18, 1988, pp. 187-188.
“Diamond Cold Cathode,” Geis et al., IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 12, No. 8, (Aug. 1989)? pp. 456-459.
“Emission Spectroscopy During Excimer Laser Albation of Graphite,” Chen and Mazumder, Appl. Phys. Letters, vol. 57, No. 21, Nov. 19, 1990, pp. 2178-2180.
“Enhanced Cold-Cathode Emission Using Composite Resin-Carbon Coatings,” S. Bajic and R.V. Latham, Dept. of Electronic Eng. & Applied Physics, Aston Univ., Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK, May 29, 1987.
“High Temperature Chemistry in Laser Plumes,” Hastie et al., John L. Margrave Research Symposium, Rice University, Apr. 29, 1994.
“Laser Plasma Source of Amorphic Diamond,” Collins et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 54, No. 3, Jan. 16, 1989, pp. 216-218.
“Optical Characterization of Thin Film Laser Deposition Processes,” Schenck, et al., SPIE, vol. 1594, Process Module Metrology, Control, and Clustering (1991), pp. 411-417.
“Optical Emission Diagnostics of Laser-Induced Plasma for Diamond-Like Film Deposition,” Chen, Appl. Phys., vol. 52A, 1991, pp. 328-334.
“Optical Observation of Plumes Formed at Laser Ablation of Carbon Materials,” Tasaka et al., Appl. Surface Science, vol. 79/80, 1994, pp. 141-145.
“Spatial Characteristics of Laser Pulsed Plasma Deposition of Thin Films,” Gorbunov, SPIE, vol. 1352, Laser Surface Microprocessing (1989), pp. 95-99.
“The Bonding of Protective Films of Amorphic Diamond to Titanium,” Collins, et al., J. Appl. Phys., vol. 71, No. 7, Apr. 1, 1992, pp. 3260-3265.
“Thermochemistry of Materials by Laser Vaporization Mass Spectrometry: 2. Graphite,” Hastie et al., High Temperatures-High Pressures, vol. 20, 1988, pp. 73-89.
“Electron Field Emission from Broad-Area Electrodes,” Noer, Applied Physics A 28, 1982, pp. 1-24.
“Emission Properties of Spindt-Type Cold Cathodes with Different Emission Cone Material”, Djubua et al., IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 38, No. 10, Oct. 1991.
“Enhanced Cold-Cathode Emission Using Composite Resin-Carbon Coatings,” S. Bajic and R.V. Latham, Dept. of Electronic Eng. & Applied Phiscs, Aston Univ., Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK, May 29, 1987.
“Field Emission Displays Based on Diamond Thin Films,” Kurnar et al., Society of Information Display Conference Technical Digest, 1993, pp. 1009-1010.
“Recent Development on ‘Microtips’ Display at LETI,” Meyer et al., Technical Digest of IUMC 91, Nagahama 1991, pp. 6-9.
Data Sheet on Anode Drive SN755769, Texas Instruments, pp. 4-81 to 4-88.
Data Sheet on Display Driver, HV38, Supertex, Inc., pp. 11-43 to 11-50.
Data Sheet on Voltage Driver, HV620, Supertex Inc., pp. 1-6, May 21, 1993.
Data Sheet on Voltage Drive, HV 622, Supertex Inc., pp. 1-5, Sep. 22, 1992.
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/326302 Oct 1994 US
Child 08/474277 US
Parent 07/851701 Mar 1992 US
Child 08/300771 US