Method of making jet fuel compositions via a dehydrocondensation reaction process

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
State of the Art
Although decalins and other bi- and polycyclic naphthenes have been recognized as excellent potential components of high-energy turbine jet fuels for three decades, there is presently no commercial process to produce specifically these type of hydrocarbons as a part of the multi-billion dollar jet fuel market. The technologies for hydrogenation of naphthalenes and other aromatics have been available for more than two decades, but commercializing such processes is hampered by the high cost of hydrogen.
Some work on alternative processes for producing decalins by dehydrodimerization (self-condensation) of monocyclic naphthenes can be found in the literature. Unfortunately, there are severe limitations in the usefulness of this previous work for the following reasons: (1) the studies were carried out over 40 to 50 years ago when product analysis was limited and difficult; (2) the experiments were performed mainly for the purpose of understanding the reaction mechanisms of commercial alkylation processes of isobutane with butenes, and, therefore, light olefins (C.sub.2 -C.sub.4) were used as alkylating agents. Consequently, the main products consisted of alkylated monocyclic naphthenes accompanied by minor quantities of decalins as by-products. The alkylcyclohexanes obtained were in the C.sub.8 -C.sub.11 range and were not suitable for use as advanced jet fuels; (3) there was insufficient information about how operating variables affect the product distribution.
It has been pointed out previously that alkylsubstituted decalins and other polycyclic naphthenes can be utilized as high quality jet engine fuels. The possibility of producing such hydrocarbons, however, has not attracted in the past the interest of the petroleum refining industry in spite of the fact that some of the potential precursors, e.g., alkylcyclopentanes, are found as abundant oil components.
In summary, there has been a need to extend the limited previous studies toward a well-defined purpose, i.e., the development of new processes for advanced jet fuels. While previous indications existed of self-condensation of methylcyclopentane in the presence of olefins, very little had been explored with respect to monocyclic naphthenes and higher, i.e., C.sub.5 -C.sub.8, olefins which were selected as reactants for the study of acid-catalyzed self-condensation and alkylation reactions directed towards obtaining jet fuel range naphthenic hydrocarbons. Complete analysis of the products, using modern analytical methods, e.g., gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR), and uC NMR, was performed, allowing for an elevation of the feasibility and the commercial potential of the self-condensation and alkylation reactions studied.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An efficient method for making jet fuel compositions of high density, low freezing point and high heat of combustion from readily available alkyl cyclopentanes, cyclopentenes, cyclohexanes and cyclohexenes has been invented.
In the instant invention, lower alkyl cyclopentanes, for example, ones which contain an alkyl group having one to three carbon atoms, are reacted with C.sub.5 -C.sub.8 olefins, which may be straight chain, branched chain, or cyclic alkenes, in the presence of sulfuric acid, preferably, at a temperature of about 10.degree. C. to about 50.degree. C. to form a reaction product having a major quantity of decalins, typically in excess of 40% of the total reaction product mixture. Such a reaction product is useful as jet fuel without further processing or with simple distillation to remove volatile components.
In addition to the presence of decalins as a major component in the reaction product, the presence of a significant quantity of C.sub.13 and higher hydrocarbons further makes the reaction product of the process of this invention especially useful as jet fuel.
The jet fuel compositions of this invention frequently have heats of combustion in excess of 130,000 btu/gal and freezing points below -72.degree. C. Best results are generally achieved through the use of C.sub.5 to C.sub.8 olefins, especially cyclic compounds such as cyclopentenes and cyclohexenes.
The reactants are generally admixed in sulfuric acid in a ratio of about 0.5:1 to about 20:1 of the alkyl pentane to olefin, with best results being achieved at a reactant ratio of about 2:1 to about 10:1. The olefin concentration in relation to the other reactant is generally maintained low to minimize olefin polymerization. A preferred reaction temperature is from about 0.degree. C. to about 40.degree. C. with especially good results being achieved at temperatures of from about 20.degree. C. to 30.degree. C.
Sulfuric acid, especially concentrated, e.g., 96% concentration or higher, is the preferred catalyst although hydrofluoric acid and phosphoric acid may be used. Phosphoric acid may be useful as a solid catalyst, which has some advantages over liquid acids. Separation of the sulfuric acid catalyst from the reaction products readily occurs, however, by settling and decantation. The non-polar hydrocarbon reaction products are generally much less dense than the very polar sulfuric acid catalyst and are readily recovered from the top of a settling tank with essentially no acid contamination.
Self-condensation and alkylation catalytic reactions of monocyclic naphthenes, i.e., methylcyclohexane, 1,3-dimethylcylopentane, ethylcyclopentane, methylcyclohexane, and 1,2-dimethylcyclohexane in the presence of higher open-chain olefins (C.sub.5 -C.sub.8): and cycloolefins (cyclohexene and cyclopentene) were investigated in detail. In addition to sulfuric acid, the activity of solid acid catalysts such as phosphoric acid on Kieselguhr, Ce.sup.+3 - and La.sup.+3 -forms of cross-linking montmorillonites (Ce--Al--CLM and La--Al--CLM), a complex of macroreticular acid cation exchange resin and aluminum chloride, rare earth exchanged Y-type zeolite, and silica-alumina were also applied and investigated.
A systematic study of the feed reactivities and reaction selectivities for catalytic alkylation vs. self-condensation was performed as a function of processing variables, i.e., temperature, reactant addition rate, cycloparaffin/olefin molar ratio, cycloparaffin and olefin structure, acid catalyst concentration and strength, was carried out.
The objectives of the study were as follows:
1. To develop selective catalytic alkylation and self-condensation reactions of monocyclic naphthenes for production of higher naphthenic hydrocarbons in the jet and diesel fuel boiling range (b.p., 100.degree.-350.degree. C.);
2. To determine the effect of processing variables on the conversion and selectivity of self-condensation vs. alkylation reactions of monocyclic naphthenes;
3. To develop and evaluate suitable catalytic systems for alkylation and self-condensation reactions of naphthenic hydrocarbons;
4. To determine the physical properties (e.g., density, freezing point, heat of combustion, etc.) of higher naphthenic products and to evaluate the latter as potential major components of advanced jet fuels; and
5. To determine the structure of higher naphthenic products obtained from monocyclic naphthenes and elucidate the mechanism of the alkylation and self-condensation reactions of the latter in the presence of acidic catalysts.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 summarizes the produce distribution of the C.sub.6.sup.+ products as a function of molar ratio;
FIG. 2 shows the distribution of the C.sub.6.sup.+ products as a function of reactants addition rate;
FIG. 3 depicts the distribution of the C.sub.6.sup.+ products as a function of temperature;
FIG. 4 summarizes the above trends in product distribution of C.sub.6.sup.+ fraction as a function of the H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 concentration;
FIG. 5 shows the product distribution of the C.sub.6.sup.+ fraction as a function of catalyst/reactant volume ratio;
FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of a liquid phase alkylation apparatus;
TABLE 1 summarizes the change in the composition of products as a function of MCP/1-hexene molar ratio in the range of 0.5 to 9.8 under otherwise nearly identical experimental conditions (T.apprxeq.22.+-.2.degree. C., addition rate.apprxeq.0.26 g/min);
TABLE 2 shows some physical properties of the C.sub.6.sup.+ fraction of the product obtained from the reaction of methylcyclopentane with 1-hexene as a function of molar ratio.
TABLE 3 summarizes the results obtained;
TABLE 4 summarizes the effect of reaction temperature (in the narrow range of -10.degree. to 50.degree. C.) upon the dehydrodimerization vs alkylation selectivity of the acid-catalyzed reaction of methycyclopentane in the presence of 1-hexene;
TABLE 5 illustrates the effect of reaction temperature on the physical properties of these products;
TABLE 6 summarizes result obtained on the selectivity of dehydrodimerization is alkylation of methylcyclopentane in the presence of normal, branched, and cyclic C.sub.6 olefins;
TABLE 7 summarizes results on the selectivity for dehydrodimerization vs alkylation of methylcyclopentane in the presence of normal, branched, and cyclic C.sub.5 olefins;
TABLE 8 summarizes results on the selectivity of the dehydrodimerization vs alkylation reactions of MCP as a function of the chain length and type of the olefin;
Table 9 shows the effect of olefin type on the physical properties of C.sub.6.sup.+ fraction in the products;
Table 10 compares the reactions of methycyclopentane with those of cis-1,3-dimethylcyclopentane and ethylcyclopentane under identical processing conditions;
TABLE 11 summarizes the results obtained;
TABLE 12 summaries the results obtained on the effect of the H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 catalyst/reactant Volume ratio upon reaction selectivity;
TABLE 13 shows the results obtained;
TABLE 14 summarizes a comparative series of experiments using various solid acid catalyst, i.e., an AlCl.sub.3 -sulfonic acid complex, a RE.sup.+ -exchanged Y-type zeolite, a hydroxy-Al.sub.13 -pillared La.sup.3+ -montmorillonite, SiO.sub.2 -Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, and H.sub.3 PO.sub.4 on Kieselguhr support1
TABLE 15 shows the effect of a selected additive, i.e., cetylamine, upon the reaction of methylcyclopentane in the presence of i-hexene.
Results obtained are summarized in Table 16; and
TABLES 17 to 23 give data on molecular peaks and major fragmentation peaks of the products, as obtained by GC-MS analysis with a high-resolution system (VG Micromass 7070 Double Focusing High Resolution Mass Spectrometer with VG Data System 200).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENT
Alkylation and Dehydrodimerization Reactions of Alkylcyclopentanes
In order to develop a novel processing concept for producing high quality jet fuels such as substituted decalins, the catalytic alkylation and self-condensation reactions of alkylcyclopentanes in the presence of olefins was systematically explored. Methylcyclopentane, and to a lesser extent, 1,3-dimethylcyclopentane, and ethylcyclopentane were used as model monocyclic naphthenic feeds. Olefinic reagents included C.sub.5 -C.sub.8 olefins, and in particular 1-hexene.
Most of the alkylation and self-condensation reactions were carried out in a semibatch system in which the hydrocarbon phase was contacted with a sulfuric acid catalyst. In some experimental runs, however, a solid acid catalyst Was used.
Liquid products obtained were identified by a combination of gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, FTIR, and NMR analysis. Quantitative analysis was performed by gas chromatography.
It is well known that alkylate quality in commercial H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 alkylation units for alkylating isobutane is a function of the isobutane concentration, olefin space velocity, acid fraction in the emulsion, and the degree of agitation (impeller speed). The evidence that higher octane rating alkylates are produced at higher agitation speed suggests that mass transfer effects are important. In prior work, Kramer determined that the solubility of methylcyclopentane in 96% H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 at 25.degree. C. is about 60 ppm and concluded that the agitation speed applied should be at least 1000 rpm to maximize the hydride transfer reactions.
In the present work, several series of experiments at a constant stirring rate (1300 rpm) were performed in order to investigate the effects of processing variables, i.e., temperature, alkylcyclopentane/olefin molar ratio, reactants addition rate, catalyst concentration, and acid strength, upon the alkylation and self-condensation reactions of methylcyclopentane (MCp). The effect of the substituent in the alkylcyclopentane feed was also examined by a comparison of the reactions of methylcyclopentane (MCP), 1,3-dimethylcyclopentane (1,3-DMCD), and ethylcyclopentane (ECP).
Effect of Alkylcyclopentane/Olefin Molar Ratio
Table 1 summarizes the change in the composition of products as a function of MCP/1-hexene molar ratio in the range of 0.5 to 9.8 under otherwise nearly identical experimental conditions (T.apprxeq.22.+-.2.degree. C., addition rate.cent.0.26 g/min). Under these conditions, three main types of products are formed, i.e., (1) dimethyldecalins (DMD), viz. self-condensation products of MCP; (2) C.sub.12 alkylcyclohexanes (plus lower alkylcyclohexanes); and (3) C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 hydrogen transfer products, predominantly branched hexanes. In addition, small amounts of hexene hydrodimers (C.sub.12 H.sub.26) and Cu.sub.12 + products (mainly C.sub.18 H.sub.34 and C.sub.18 H.sub.32) are observed.
Dimethyldecalins are formed by the condensation of two moles of methylcyclopentane with the liberation of one mole of hydrogen. Hexenes and hexene dimers play the role of hydrogen acceptors to form branched hexanes and hydrodimers.
As seen from Table 1, an increase in MCP/1-hexene molar ratio results in a decrease in the MCP conversion (from 91.6% to 27.5%). However, the selectivity of the MCP conversion to dimethyldecalins vs C.sub.12 alkylcyclohexanes markedly increases (from 12.5% at a MCP/1-hexene molar ratio of 0.5 to 98.6% at a ratio of 9.8). Self-condensation (dehydrodimerization) of methylcyclopentane to form dimethyldecalins and attendant hydrogen transfer to form branched hexanes become predominant reactions at MCP/1-hexene molar ratios of 1.5 to 9.8. At a ratio of 9.8, about 99% of the 1-hexene is converted to methylpentanes and a selectivity of 98.6 wt% for formation of dimethyldecalins is observed. The formation of hydrodimers (C.sub.12 H.sub.26) decreases as the molar ratio increases, while the yield of C.sub.12 alkylcyclohexanes first increases, and reaches a maximum at a ratio of 1.0, but then sharply decreases as the molar ratio is further increased. Likewise, the formulation of C.sub.7 -C.sub.11 hydrocarbons (mostly C.sub. 7 -C.sub.11 alkylcyclohexanes) decreases sharply as the molar ratio increases. FIG. 1 summarizes the produce distribution of the C.sub.6.sup.+ products as a function of molar ratio.
Table 2 shows some physical properties of the C.sub.6 + fraction of the product obtained from the reaction of methylcyclopentane with 1-hexene as a function of molar ratio. All the C.sub.6.sup.+ products show excellent physical properties. For a MCP/1-hexene molar ratio of 2 or greater, the properties of C.sub.6.sup.+ products exceed the specifications of JP-8X and nearly meet the JP-11 specifications.
Effect of Reactant's Addition Rate
The effect of the addition rate of MCP -1-hexene reactant mixture to the liquid catalyst (H.sub.2 SO.sub.4) was also studied. The range of addition rates examined was 0.23 to 1.86 g/min. Results obtained are summarized in Table 3. As seen, increase in reactants addition rate results in a slight decrease in MCP conversion (from 73.8% to 65.0%) and in a moderate decrease in the selectivity of MCP conversion to dimethyldecalins vs C.sub.12 alkylcyclohexanes (from 83.9% to 0.26 g/min to 60.6% at 1.86 g/min). Further, the yield of hydrodimers (C.sub.12 H.sub.26) increases to some extend with increase in the addition rate. The distribution of the C.sub.6 + products as a function of reactants addition rate is shown also in FIG. 2. C.sub.7 -C.sub.11 hydrocarbons which are minor products increase but only slightly with increased addition rate.
Effect of Temperature
Table 4 summarizes the effect of reaction temperature (in the narrow range of -10.degree. to 50.degree. C.) upon the dehydrodimerization vs alkylation selectivity of the acid-catalyzed reaction of methycyclopentane in the presence of 1-hexene. As seen, the total MCP conversion observed under the experimental conditions remains essentially constant (70-76 wt%) at temperatures between -10.degree. to 23.degree. C. and then drops to a slight extent between 30.degree.-50.degree. C. The selectivity for dehydrodimerization was also unchanged between -10.degree. to 23.degree. C., but increased as the temperature was raised to 31.degree.-50.degree. C. The observed decrease in the yield of C.sub.12 alkylcyclohexanes with increase in temperature is consistent with the previously observed decrease in the rate of alkylation of isobutane with olefins at higher temperatures, e.g., >45 .degree. C. The distribution of the C. products as a function of temperature is depicted in FIG. 3. Table 5 illustrates the effect of reaction temperature on the physical properties of these products. All the C.sub.6.sup.+ products show excellent physical properties, i.e., high density, high heats of combustion, and very low freezing points. The products obtained at reaction temperatures between 23.degree.-31.degree. C. show the best properties, suggesting that water could be used as a coolant for the reaction. In such a case, the refrigeration cost will be much lower than that in a commercial H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 alkylation unit which usually operates in the range of 2.degree.-13.degree. C.
Effects of Olefinic Reactant Structure and of Alkylcyclopentane Type
Information on the reactivity of methylcyclopentane in the presence of structurally distinct C.sub.5 -C.sub.8 normal and branched olefins, as well as cyclic olefins, is of importance in determining the feasibility of a process for production of naphthene-rich jet fuels. Table 6 summarizes result obtained on the selectivity of dehydrodimerization vs alkylation of methylcyclopentane in the presence of normal, branched, and cyclic C.sub.6 olefins. Comparison of the reactants in the presence of C.sub.6 open-chain olefins (runs no. 11, 24, 25, 26, and 27) indicates that in the presence of the normal isomer (1-hexene) the MCP conversion is somewhat higher (74.1%) than that obtained with the singly branched C.sub.6 H.sub.12 isomer,4-methyl-1-pentene (65.4%). Higher selectivity for MCP conversion to DMD vs C.sub.12 alkylcyclohexanes is observed (71.9%-73.4%) in the presence of doubly branched C.sub.6 olefins (i.e., 2,3-dimethyl-1-butene; 2.3-dimethyl-2-butene; 3,3-dimethyl-i-butene) which are apparently excellent hydrogen acceptors, and due to steric reasons caused relatively high DMD vs ring alkylation selectivity. Dimethyldecalins and some tricyclics (C.sub.18 H.sub.32) are the predominant products in the run with cyclohexene as reactant. The yield of these products are 92.6 wt% in the C.sub.6.sup.+ fraction, respectively.
Table 7 summarizes results on the selectivity for dehydrodimerization vs alkylation of methylcyclopentane in the presence of normal, branched, and cyclic C.sub.5 olefins. As seen, the reaction selectivity trends of methylcyclopentane are similar to those in the presence of C.sub.6 olefins. Thus, conversion is somewhat higher with the normal olefins (1-pentene and 2-pentene) a compared with that in the presence of a singly branched isomer (2-methyl-i-butene). Further, MCP conversion is significantly lower, but the selectivity for dimethyldecalin (plus monomethyldecalin) formation is markedly higher in the presence of cyclopentene (run 31) indicating a high reactivity of cyclopentene both as a hydrogen acceptor and alkylating agent. The total yield of hydrogen transfer products obtained with cyclopentene is lower than that obtained with open chain C.sub.5 olefins. As above indicated, methyldecalins and tricyclic naphthenes (C.sub.16 H.sub.28) are major products when cyclopentene is used as olefinic reactant. The yields of such compounds are 78.6 wt% and 16.6 wt% of the C.sub.6.sup.+ product, respectively.
Table 8 summarizes results on the selectivity of the dehydrodimerization vs alkylation reactions of MCP as a function of the chain length and type of the olefin. As seen, for cis-2-butene the DMD selectivity is rather low (25%), whereas the alkylation selectivity, leading to C.sub.10 -C.sub.14 polyaklylsubstituted cyclohexanes, is very high (.about.74%). However, there is a sharp increase in DMD selectivity with increase in the chain length of the olefin from C.sub.4 to C.sub.5 and C.sub.6, as reflected by the selectivities with 1-C.sub.5 H.sub.10 (64.6%) and 1-C.sub.6 H.sub.12 (68.9%) as olefinic reactants. The selectivity with the normal C.sub.7 and C.sub.8 olefins (1-heptene and 1-octene) is slightly higher (72.3% and 71.4%, respectively) than that with 1-hexene, but it decreases to some extent with the branched isomer, 2,4,4-trimethyl-1-pentene (55.0%).
Table 9 shows the effect of olefin type on the physical properties of C.sub.6.sup.+ fraction in the products. The products obtained with cyclohexene and cyclopentene as olefinic reactants exhibit excellent physical properties and can be used as potential components of advanced jet fuels, e.g., JP-11.
Table 10 compares the reactions of methycyclopentane with those of cis-1,3-dimethylcyclopentane and ethylcyclopentane under identical processing conditions (see footnote a). As seen (experiment 36), the overall conversion and product distribution from 1,3-dimethylcyclopentane is similar to that of methylcyclopentane, indicating that di- or polymethylsubstituted cyclopentanes present as major components in naphthas can be easily transformed into bicyclic naphthenes under the processing conditions. The bicyclic products from cis-1,3-DMCP consist mostly of tetramethyldecalins as compared with the formation of dimethyldecalins from MCP.
The reaction of ethylcyclopentane, on the other hand, is quite different as it produces C.sub.13 alkylcyclohexanes in much higher yield than bicyclic naphthenes (experiment 36-1). The difference can be explained by the fast skeletal isomerization of ECP to methylcyclohexane (MCH) in the presence of sulfuric acid, MCH undergoes faster ring alkylation to polyalkylated cyclohexanes than self-condensation to bicyclic naphthenes. It was indeed found in experiment 36-1 that about 65% of the "unreacted" ethylcyclopentane feed consists of methylcyclohexane.
Effect of Acid Concentration of Acid/Reactant Ratio
In commercial sulfuric acid alkylation units, the acid concentration is usually kept at least a level of 88 to 90 wt% to eliminate side reactions. In the present work, a series of experiments were performed to examine the effect of acid concentration, in the range of 80 to 100 wt%, upon the catalytic reactions of methylcyclopentane with 1-hexene. Results obtained are summarized in Table 11. The acid concentration indicated is that of the initial catalyst introduced in the reactor. As seen, the total MCP conversion is in a narrow range (68.3-74.1%) for acid concentrations .gtoreq.94%. The conversion is in a narrow range (68.3-74.1%) for acid concentrations from 100% to 96%, but then gradually decreases by further decrease in concentration from 96% to 90%. Decrease in acid concentration to 80% causes a sharp decrease in MCP conversion. It was also found (Table 11) that the acid concentration affects the selectivity for DMD vs. alkylcyclohexane formation, i.e., the selectivity gradually decreases in acid catalyst concentration (from 74.8% at a concentration of 100% to 62.2% at a concentration of 92%), and then sharply drops (to 13.4%) at a concentration of 80%. The results obtained show that self-condensation of methycyclopentane is the principal reaction when the H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 catalyst concentration is kept at a level .gtoreq.94 wt%. FIG. 4 summarizes the above trends in product distribution of C.sub.6.sup.+ fraction as a function of the H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 concentration. At a level of 80%, dimerization of the olefin (1-hexene) becomes the main reaction.
Commercial alkylation units are usually set with 40-60 vol% acid in the reaction emulsion. In the present work, a series of additional experiments were performed to examine the effect of acid/reactant volume ratio upon the direction of catalytic reactions of methycyclopentane in the presence of 1-hexene. Table 12 summaries the results obtained on the effect of the H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 catalyst/reactant volume ratio upon reaction selectivity. As seen, the MCP conversion is approximately constant (.about.72-75%) for catalyst/reactant volume ratios in the range of 0.7 to 1.5, and it is only slightly lower (.about.65-67%) at lower ratios (0.2-0.5). On the other hand, the selectivity for dehydrodimerization vs. alkylation increases to some extent (from 51.7% to 77.6%) with increase in the catalyst/reactant ratio. The significance of run 43 is that the reaction can be satisfactorily performed even at relatively low catalyst/reactant ratios (about 30 vol% acid in the emulsion) without any major decrease in conversion and selectivity. FIG. 5 shows the product distribution of the C.sub.6.sup.+ fraction as a function of catalyst/reactant volume ratio.
Effect of Acid Catalyst Type
Problems involved in commercial alkylation processes with sulfuric acid and HF as catalyst include the handling of highly corrosive materials and the necessity of treatment of the alkylates aimed at removal of traces of acids and sulfate esters. A solid acid catalyst could eliminate many of these problems. Although most of the present work was performed with sulfuric acid as catalyst, several solid acids were also examined as potential catalysts. Several runs with MCP and 1-hexene as reactants were performed in a semi-batch reactor at temperatures in the range of 26.degree.-15.degree. C., using an AlCl.sub.3 -sulfonic acid resin complex as catalyst. Table 13 shows the results obtained. As seen, C.sub.12 alkylcyclohexanes (mostly methylpentylcyclohexanes) are the principal products at temperatures of 26.degree.-58.degree. C. (experiments 47-49), indicating that at such low reaction temperatures the extent of DMD formation with this catalyst is rather negligible. The predominant reaction involves ring alkylation of the monocyclic naphthene reactant (MCP). The direction of the reaction, however, did change in a dramatic manner in another experiment (no. 50) which was performed at a higher temperature (115.degree. C.) in a 150 cm.sup.3 autoclave reactor. In this run, dimethyldecalins (and some higher boiling products) were formed in markedly higher yield as compared with that of C.sub.12 alkylcyclohexanes. This observation is of major importance since it indicates that the self-condensation and alkylation of alkylcyclopentanes can be eventually performed at higher temperature in a continuous flow reactor using a suitable solid acid catalyst.
Table 14 summarizes a comparative series of experiments using various solid acid catalyst, i.e., an AlCl.sub.3 -sulfonic acid complex, a RE.sup.3+ -exchanged Y-type zeolite, a hydroxy-Al.sub.13 -pillared La.sup.'+ -montmorillonite, SiO.sub.2 -Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, and H.sub.3 PO.sub.4 on Kieselguhr support. A 150 ml autoclave was employed in these runs and the reaction temperature was in the narrow range of 190.degree.-225.degree. C. (except in run 50, where a temperature of 115.degree. C. was used due to the low thermal stability of the resin catalyst). As seen, the reactions in the presence of all catalysts, with the exception of the AlCl.sub.3 -sulfonic acid resin, yield mostly C.sub.12 alkylcyclohexanes under the experimental conditions indicated. In the presence of such solid catalysts, polymerization of 1-hexene also occurred to some extent (12.8-25.2%), as a competing reaction.
Effect of Other Processing Variables
Introducing a suitable additive into the alkylation reactor has been applied in refining industries to reduce sulfuric acid consumption. Evidence of a slower rate of degradation of the acid concentration by using cetylamine and oetyltrimethylammonium bromide was provided by Kramer with respect to commercial isobutane alkylation. Table 15 shows the effect of a selected additive, i.e., cetylamine, upon the reaction of methylcyclopentane in the presence of 1-hexene. As seen, the additive has essentially no effect upon the MCP conversion, whereas the selectivity for DMD vs. ring alkylation is apparently slightly increased in the presence of the additive. Furthermore, the yield of tricyclic hydrocarbons (C.sub.18 H.sub.32) decreases to some extent. The weight gained in the acid phase is slightly reduced. This indicates that the formation of conjunct polymers and the acid consumption are reduced in the presence of the cetylamine. Some amounts of alkyl esters (a viscous yellowish liquid) are obtained when cetylamine was added to the H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 catalyst.
Addition of minor amounts of promoters, e.g., trifluoromethanesulfuric acid (CF.sub.3 SO.sub.3 H) or fluorosulfonic acid to the alkylation catalyst (i.e., HF or H.sub.2 SO.sub.4) has been previously found to increase the yield and the octane ratings of the alkylate.
In the present work several runs with CF.sub.3 SO.sub.3 H as promoter were performed using again MCP and i-hexene as reactants. Results obtained are summarized in Table 16. As seen, CF.sub.3 SO.sub.3 H has no promoting effect upon the total MCP conversion, although it may be causing a minor increase in DMD selectivity. It should be noted that the water content in 96% H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 used in our runs may be too high to be tolerated by the promotor, since trifluoromethane sulfonic acid reacts rapidly with water to form a stable monohydrate.
EXAMPLE
Two reactor systems for the study of alkylation and dehydrodimerization reactions were constructed and applied; i.e.:
1. A liquid-phase semibatch reactor, consisting of a three-neck flask 1, equipped with a a magnetic stirrer 2, a reflux condenser 6, a dropping funnel 5, for introducing the reactants, and a water bath (FIG. 6); and
2. A high pressure magnedash autoclave of 150 cm.sup.3 capacity.
In most experiments with the liquid-phase semibatch reactor, a liquid acid (concentrated H.sub.2 SO.sub.4) was placed in the three-necked flask of 1000 ml capacity, and a mixture of the starting materials (naphthene plus olefin) were added dropwise. Contact between the acid and the hydrocarbon reactants was ensured by vigorous mixing. Following is a description of a typical experimental run.
One hundred sixty g of 96% H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 was placed in the reactor, which was controlled at the desired temperature (e.g., 25.degree. C.), and a mixture consisting of 33.5 g of methylcyclopentane and 17.0 g of 1-hexene was added dropwise to the vigorously stirred acid catalyst at a rate of about 1.2 g/min (total addition time, .about.42 min). After completing the addition of the reactants, the mixture was stirred for an additional period of 30 min and then left to stand for one hour. The acid layer was then separated from the upper hydrocarbon layer with a separatory funnel, and the hydrocarbon product was sequentially washed with deionized water, aqueous 5% NaOH, and finally again with deionized water. The washed product was dried over anhydrous MgSO.sub.4 overnight, filtered, and analyzed by gas chromatography and other methods (see below).
In experiments performed in the autoclave reactor, a solid acid catalyst (e.g. Mobil Durabead #8, rare-earth exchanged Y-zeolite, SiO.sub.2 -Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, or hydroxy-Al pillared La.sup.+3 montmorillonite) was first calcined at a temperature of 530.degree. C. for 22 hours. In the case of solid silico-phosphoric acid (H.sub.3 PO.sub.4 on Kieselguhr) as catalyst, the preliminary heating was performed at 220.degree. for 2 hours.
In a typical run with solid catalyst, about 25 g of the reactant mixture, consisting of methylcyclopentane/1-hexene in a molar ratio of 2.0, was charged to the autoclave and 6 g of catalyst was introduced in the Magnedash catalyst cage. The autoclave was pressurized with nitrogen 5 to I500 psig and heated without stirring to the desired temperature, at which time the stirring was started. The reaction was continued for a period of 2-4 hours. At the end the reactor was cooled down to room temperature and the product was removed, filtered, and subjected to analysis.
Methyl pentane and cyclopentene in a molar ratio of 2 to 1 were introduced together into a vessel containing 96% sulfuric acid The reaction mixture was agitated for a period of time (about 3 hours) at a temperature of about 25.degree..
The sulfuric acid/reaction product mixture was permitted to settle. The reaction products (hydrocarbons) were recovered from the top of the vessel.
The reaction product was analyzed and found to have the following content: 3.4 wt.% C.sub.4 -C.sub.5 : alkanes, 7.0 wt.% cyclopentane, 0.7 wt.% C.sub.7 -C.sub.10 hydrocarbons, 70.4 wt.% methyldecalins, 3.6 wt.% dimethyldecalins, and 14.9 wt.% C.sub.12.sup.+ hydrocarbons (mostly C.sub.16 H.sub.28 ; tricyclic naphthenes).
The inventive process described herein is preferably operated to provide a specification for jet fuel which contains a minimum content of about 35% and preferably at about 40% decalins and at least 4% and preferably about 10% alkylated single ring naphthenes and higher hydrocarbons with minimum distillation or refining to remove excess reactants and volatiles.
Conducting the process in the preferred manner, as described hereinabove, and as may be readily discerned from the experimental data set forth in the various tables and graphs readily produce a reaction product having the preferred quantity of decalins. Jet fuels have specifications which enhance boiling points, freezing points and the like.
TABLE 1______________________________________Effect of Methylcyclopentane (MCP)/1-Hexene Molar Ratio uponDehydrodimerization (DHD) vs. Ring Alkylation Selectivity.sup.a______________________________________Experiment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8no.Reactantcharged, gMCP 20 30 41 37 49.5 50 46.3 491-Hexene 40.5 30 27.5 18.5 16.5 12.5 7.7 5Catalyst, g 166.5 159.5 175.5 167.5 182 178.4 162.4 146.596% H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 4.0 6.0 9.8MCP/1-Hexene(molar ratio)Productrecovered, gHydro- 46 47.5 60 48.5 62 60 51.8 53.5carbonsAcid layer 178.5 167.5 179.5 169.5 182 178.4 161.6 144Losses 2.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.0 2.5 2.8 3.0MCP conver- 91.6 89.3 80.6 73.1 60.5 50.2 40.3 27.5sion, wt %Productdistribution,wt %C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 Hy- 26.6 36.0 37.5 35.6 34.3 34.5 36.1 43.0drocarbons.sup.bC.sub.7 -C.sub.11 Hy- 32.7 10.2 2.6 1.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.2drocarbons.sup.cHydrodimers 18.8 9.7 2.7 1.5 0.4 1.2 0.4 0.1(C.sub.12 H.sub.26).sup.dC.sub.12 Alkyl- 10.6 16.5 7.1 6.5 4.7 4.8 3.4 0.3cyclohexanesDimethyl- 9.2 24.9 46.1 50.7 57.4 55.4 56.7 56.2decalins(DMD)Higher 2.1 2.7 4.0 4.2 2.6 3.6 3.1 0.2(C.sub.12.sup.+)Selectivity 12.5 38.9 73.8 78.8 87.3 84.6 88.7 98.6for DMD,wt %.sup.e______________________________________ .sup.a Reaction conditions: T = 22 .+-. 2.degree. C.; reactants addition rate, 0.26 g/min (0.35 g/min in experiment no. 5). .sup.b Hydrogen transfer products (predominantly branched hexanes). .sup.c Mostly alkylcyclohexanes. .sup.d Branched dodecanes. .sup.e Selectivity of MCP conversion into dimethyldecalins (excluding the C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 hydrogen transfer products).
TABLE 2______________________________________Effect of the MCP/1-Hexene Molar Ratio uponSome Physical Properties of the C.sub.6.sup.+ Product.sup.a______________________________________Experiment 2 4 6no.MCP/1- 1.0 2.0 4.0Hexene(molar ratio)Density (g/ 0.8270 0.8618 0.8679cm 15.6.degree. C.)Freeezing <-72 <-72 <-72point, .degree.C.Hydrogen 13.94 13.55 13.43content,wt %Net heat ofcombustionBtu/lb 18,546 18,384 18,362Btu/gal 128,000 132,200 133,000______________________________________ .sup.a Total product higher than C.sub.6 hydrocarbons.
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________Effect of Reactants Addition Rate upon the Dehydrodimerization (DHD) vs.Ring Alkylation Selectivity in the Reaction of Methylcyclopentane(MCP).sup.a__________________________________________________________________________Experiment no. 9 4 10 11 12 13 14 15 16Reactant added, gMCP 80 37 36 36 37 36 40 36 361-Hexene 40 18.5 18 18 18.5 18 20 18 18Catalyst, g 96% H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 329 167.5 151.5 157.4 160 157.4 151.4 155 157.5Reactant addition rate, g/min 0.23 0.26 0.31 0.32 0.56 0.71 0.90 1.50 1.86Product recovered, gHydrocarbons 112 48.5 49.7 49.6 50.5 49.6 54.1 49.0 49.1Acid layer 334 169.5 154.2 159.6 162 160.5 155.4 158.7 161.5Losses 3.0 5.0 1.6 2.2 3.0 1.3 1.9 1.3 0.9MCP conversion, wt % 73.8 73.1 74.6 74.1 71.6 70.6 69.6 67.5 65.0Product distribution, wt %C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 Hydrocarbons.sup.b 34.2 35.6 31.1 30.9 35.2 31.8 31.6 32.0 32.2C.sub.7 -C.sub.11 Hydrocarbons.sup.c 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.8 2.1 2.0Hydrodimers (C.sub.12 H.sub.26).sup.d 0.8 1.5 3.4 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.5 5.2 5.7C.sub.12 Alkylcyclohexanes 6.0 6.5 8.3 9.1 9.4 9.6 10.0 10.9 12.1Dimethyldecalins (DMD) 55.0 50.7 47.0 47.6 46.9 45.4 44.9 42.4 41.1Higher (C.sub.12.sup.+) 2.6 4.2 8.6 7.1 2.7 7.2 7.2 7.4 6.9Selectivity for DMD, wt %.sup.e 83.9 78.8 68.2 68.9 72.4 66.6 65.6 62.4 60.9__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Reaction conditions: MCP/1Hexene = 2.0 (molar), T = 22 .+-. 2.degree. C. .sup.b Hydrogen transfer products (predominantly branched hexanes). .sup.c Mostly alkylcyclohexanes. .sup.d Branched dodecanes. .sup.e Selectivity of MCP conversion into dimethyldecalins (excluding the C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 hydrogen transfer products).
TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________Effect of Reaction Temperature upon the Dehydrodimerization (DHD) vs.Ring AlkylationSelectivity in the Reaction of Methylcyclopentane (MCP).sup.a__________________________________________________________________________Experiment no. 17 18 19 20 11 12 21 22Reactant added, gMCP 36 36 36 36 36 36 37 361-Hexene 18 18 18 18 18 18 18.5 18Catalyst, g 96% H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 163.3 162.6 161 157.6 157.4 151.5 166 160.4Reaction temperature, .degree.C. -10 0 2 9 21 23 31 50Product recovered, gHydrocarbons 49 49.9 50 49.7 49.5 49.7 48.5 44.1Acid layer 166 164.8 166.5 160.4 159.5 154.2 168 168.4Losses 2.3 1.9 1.0 1.6 2.3 1.6 5.0 0.9MCP conversion, wt % 76.0 69.8 70.0 70.0 74.1 74.6 65.1 61.1Product distribution, wt %C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 Hydrocarbons.sup.b 26.3 32.5 30.4 32.8 30.9 31.1 40.3 51.4C.sub.7 -C.sub.11 Hydrocarbons.sup.c 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.7Hydrodimers (C.sub.12 H.sub.26).sup.d 3.7 3.7 4.6 3.6 3.8 3.4 3.5 2.3C.sub.12 Alkylcyclohexanes 16.5 12.0 13.5 9.8 9.1 8.3 6.4 5.2Dimethyldecalins (DMD) 50.9 46.8 48.2 48.5 47.6 47.0 45.6 38.1Higher (C.sub.12 H.sup.+) 1.8 6.1 2.3 4.2 7.1 8.6 2.9 1.3Selectivity for DMD, wt %.sup.e 69.1 69.3 69.3 72.2 68.9 68.2 76.4 78.4__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Reaction conditions: MCP/1Hexene = 2.0 (molar); reactants addition rate, 0.3 g/min. .sup.b Hydrogen transfer products (predominantly branched hexanes). .sup.c Mostly alkylcyclohexanes. .sup.d Branched dodecanes. .sup.e Selectivity of MCP conversion into dimethyldecalins (excluding the C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 hydrogen transfer products).
TABLE 5______________________________________Effect of Temperature upon Some PhysicalProperties of the C.sub.6.sup.+ Product.sup.a______________________________________Experiment no. 17 19 12 21 22Reaction temperature, -10 2 23 31 50.degree.C.Density (g/cm.sup.3 @ 0.8538 0.8544 0.8618 0.8591 0.857515.6.degree. C.)Freezing point, .degree.C. <-72 <-72 <-72 <-72 --Hydrogen content, 13.69 13.58 13.55 13.43 13.51wt %Net heatof combustionBtu/lb 18,470 18,464 18,364 18,463 18,300Btu/gal 131,600 131,650 132,200 132,400 131,000______________________________________ .sup.a Total product higher than C.sub.6 hydrocarbons.
TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________Effect of C.sub.6 Olefin Structure upon the Dehydrodimerization (DHD) vs.Ring AlkylationSelectivity in the Reaction of Methylcyclopentane (MCP).sup.a__________________________________________________________________________Olefin Type 1-Hexene 4-Methyl- 2,3-Dimethyl- 2,3-Dimethyl- 3,3-Dimethyl- Cyclohexene 1-pentene 1-butene 2-butene 1-buteneExperiment no. 11 27 25 24 26 23Reactant added, gMCP 36 36 36 36 36 38Olefin 18 18 18 18 18 19Catalyst, g 96% H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 157.4 166.5 150.6 153 146.7 154Product recovered, gHydrocarbons 49.5 49.9 47.6 47.6 46.1 45.5Acid layer 159.6 169.5 152.6 155 149.5 163Losses 2.3 1.4 4.4 4.9 5.1 2.5MCP conversion, wt % 74.1 66.5 64.0 65.0 64.9 --Product distribution, wt %C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 Hydrocarbons.sup.b 30.9 30.9 31.4 32.5 41.6 4.6C.sub.7 -C.sub.11 Hydrocarbons.sup.c 1.5 2.3 11.5 9.3 5.4 0.4Hydrodimers (C.sub.12 H.sub.26).sup.d 3.2 7.2 2.0 3.0 2.6 --C.sub.12 Alkylcyclohexanes 9.1 9.0 2.4 2.6 3.7 --Dimethyldecalins (DMD) 47.6 45.2 49.3 49.2 42.9 88.5Higher (C.sub.12 H.sup.+) 7.1 5.4 3.4 3.4 3.8 6.5Selectivity for DMD, wt %.sup.e 68.9 65.4 71.9 72.9 73.4 92.8__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Reaction conditions: T = 25 .+-. 2.degree. C., MCP/olefin = 2.0 (molar); reactant addition rate = 0.31 g/min. .sup.b Hydrogen transfer product (predominantly branched hexanes). .sup.c Mostly alkylcyclohexanes. .sup.d Branched dodecanes. .sup.e Selectivity of MCP conversion into dimethyldecalins (excluding the C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 hydrogen transfer products).
TABLE 7______________________________________Effect of C.sub.5 Olefin Structure upon theDehydrodimerization (DHD) vs. Ring Alkylationin the Reaction of Methylcyclopentane (MCP).sup.a______________________________________Experiment no. 28 29 30 31Olefin type 1-pentene 2-pentene 2-methyl- cyclo- 1-butene penteneReactant added, gMCP 38 36 36 38Olefin 15.8 15 15 15.4Catalyst, g 96% 161.8 153.7 161.3 156.3H.sub.2 SO.sub.4Product recovered, gHydrocarbons 49.1 45.0 45.8 44.7Acid layer 164 155.2 163.1 162.4Losses 2.5 4.5 3.4 2.6MCP conversion, wt 71.7 71.9 66.8 56.9Product distribution,wt %C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 Hydrocarbons.sup.b 21.4 24.8 21.4 10.4.sup.cC.sub.7 -C.sub.9 Hydrocarbons 2.8 5.8 5.9 0.7Hydrodimers 3.4 0.9 5.6 --(C.sub.10 H.sub.22).sup.dC.sub.11 Alkylcyclo- 14.7 12.4 12.9 --hexanesDimethyldecalins 50.8 51.5 49.2 (74.0).sup.e(DMD)Higher (C.sub.12.sup.+) 6.9 4.6 5.9 14.9Selectivity for DMD, 64.6 68.4 62.6 82.6wt %.sup.f______________________________________ .sup.a Reaction conditions: T .congruent. 25 .+-. 2.degree. C., MCP/olefin = 2.0 (molar); reactants addition rate .congruent. 0.3 g/min. .sup.b Hydrogen transfer products (isopentane and cyclopentane). .sup.c Mostly cyclopentane. .sup.d Branched decanes. .sup.e In this experiment, methyldecalins are a major component. .sup.f Selectivity of MCP conversion into dimethyldecalins and methyldecalins (run 31) [excluding the C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 hydrogen transfer products].
TABLE 8__________________________________________________________________________Change in Selectivity for Dehydrodimerization (DHD) of Methylcyclopentane(MCP) as a Function of Olefin Chain Length and Type.sup.a__________________________________________________________________________Experiment no. 32 28 11 33 34 35Olefin type cis-butene.sup.b 1-pentene 1-hexene 1-heptene 1-octene 2,4,4-Trimethyl- 1-penteneReactant added, gMCP 44 38 36 34.5 36 34.2Olefin 14.9 15.8 18 20.1 24.5 22.6Catalyst, g 96% H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 119 161.8 157.4 150.9 165.5 167.8Product recovered, gHydrocarbons 55.5 49.1 49.5 50 56.5 49Acid layer 120 164 159.6 152 168.7 172.2Losses 2.4 2.5 2.3 3.5 0.8 3.4MCP conversion, wt % 58.9 71.7 74.1 77.9 75.7 82.6Product distribution, wt %C.sub.4 -C.sub.8 Hydrocarbons.sup.c 11.7 24.2 32.4 39.5 42.2 37.0Hydrodimers (C.sub.8 -C.sub.12) 3.4 3.8 -- -- --Alkylcyclohexanes (C.sub.10 -C.sub.14) 65.5 14.7 9.1 52.9.sup.d 8.2 --Dimethyldecalins (DMD) 22.1 50.8 47.6 41.3 42.5.sup.fHigher 0.7.sup.g 6.9.sup.g 7.1.sup.g 7.6.sup.h 8.3.sup.i 4.5Selectivity for DMD, wt %.sup.j 25.0 64.6 68.9 72.3.sup.k 71.4 55.0.sup.k__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a In each run was used a MCP/olefin ratio of 2.0; reaction temperature 23 .+-. 2.degree. C.; reactants addition rate, 0.31 g/min; .sup.b In this run the gaseous olefin (cis2-butene) was passed slowly (85 ml/min) through a liquid mixture of MCP and concentrated H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 ; essentially no unreacted cis2-butene was detected at the outlet of the batch reactor; .sup.c Mostly hydrogen transfer products; .sup.d Dimethyldecalins and C.sub.13 alkylcyclohexanes; .sup.e Mostly C.sub.11 and C.sub.12 alkylcyclohexanes; .sup.f Included some C.sub.13 and C.sub.14 alkylcyclohexanes; .sup.g C.sub.12.sup.+ hydrocarbons; .sup.h C.sub.13.sup.+ hydrocarbons; .sup.i C.sub.14.sup.+ hydrocarbons; .sup.j Selectivity of MCP conversion into dimethyldecalins (excluding the C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 hydrogen transfer products); .sup.k Estimated value.
TABLE 9__________________________________________________________________________Effect of Olefin upon the Physical Properties of C.sub.6.sup.+ ProductsObtained from the Reaction of Methylcyclopentane (MCP).sup.a__________________________________________________________________________Experiment no. 32 28 31 23 12 34Olefin type cis-2-butene 1-pentene cyclopentene cyclohexene 1-hexene 1-octeneDensity (g/cm.sup.3 @ 15.6.degree. C.) 0.8144 0.8579 0.8897 0.8779 0.8618 0.8609Freezing point, .degree.C. <-72 <-72 -- <-72 <-72 <-72Hydrogen content, wt % 14.12 13.48 13.03 13.23 13.55 13.45Net heat of combustionBtu/lb 18,620 18,292 18,292 18,352 18,384 18,384Btu/gal 126,500 131,000 135,800 134,450 132,200 132,040__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Total product higher than C.sub.6 hydrocarbons.
TABLE 10______________________________________Comparison of Selectivities Self-Condensation vs. Alkylationfor Methylcyclopentane (MC), cis-1,3-Dimethylcyclopentane(cis-1,3-DMCP) and Ethylcyclopentane (ECP).sup.a______________________________________Experiment no. 12 36 36-1Alkylcyclopentane type MCP cis-1,3-DMCP ECPReactant added, gAlkylcyclopentane 36 0.37 331-Hexene 18 0.16 14.5Catalyst, g 96% H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 151.5 12 153.7Product recovered, gHydrocarbons 49.7 .about.0.5 40.5Acid layer 154.2 .about.12 157.7Losses 1.6 <0.1 3.0Alkylcyclopentane conversion, 74.6 .about.75 50.9wt %Product distribution, wt %C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 Hydrocarbons.sup.b 31.1 28.8 29.7C.sub.7 -C.sub.11 Hydrocarbons 1.5 4.2 11.7Hydrodimers (C.sub.12 H.sub.26).sup.c 3.4 4.3 8.1Alkylcyclohexanes 8.3.sup.d 10.0.sup.e 39.5.sup.eBicyclic naphthenes 47.0.sup.f 51.3.sup.g 10.6.sup.gHigher 8.6 1.4 0.4Selectivity, wt %.sup.h 68.2 72.0 15.1______________________________________ .sup.a Reaction conditions: Alkylcyclopentane/1hexene = 2.0 (molar); reactants addition rate .congruent. 0.3 g/min; reaction temperature = 22 .+-. 2.degree. C. .sup.b Hydrogen transfer products (predominantly branched hexanes). .sup.c Branched dodecanes. .sup.d Mostly C.sub.12 Alkylcyclohexanes. .sup.e Mostly C.sub.13 Alkylcyclohexanes. .sup.f Dimethyldecalins. .sup.g Tetramethyldecalins. .sup.h Selectivity of alkylcyclopentane conversion into bicyclic naphthenes (excluding the hydrogen transfer products).
TABLE 11______________________________________Effect of Sulfuric Acid Concentration upon theDehydrodimerization (DHD) vs. Ring AlkylationSelectivity in the Reaction of Methylcyclopentane (MCP).sup.a______________________________________Experiment no. 37 37-1 11 38 39 40 41Reactant added, gMCP 36 36 36 36 36 36 361-Hexene 18 18 18 18 18 18 18Catalyst, g 158 157.6 157.4 155.2 158.5 157 159.796% H.sub.2 SO.sub.4Acid concentration, 100 98 96 94 92 90 80wt %Productrecovered, gHydrocarbons 49.3 48.6 49.5 49.2 48.8 48.8 41.3Acid layer 160.2 160.5 159.6 158.7 161.7 160.2 170.2Losses 2.5 2.5 2.3 1.3 2.0 2.0 2.0MCP conversion, 71.2 72.0 74.1 68.7 59.7 49.9 8.6wt %Productdistribution, wt %C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 34.0 34.0 30.9 32.8 34.9 39.2 24.6Hydrocarbons.sup.bC.sub. 7 -C.sub.11 1.6 1.8 1.5 1.9 2.3 3.6 4.2HydrocarbonsHydrodimers 3.6 4.1 3.2 4.1 6.2 10.0 48.3(C.sub.12 H.sub.26).sup.cC.sub.12 Alkylcyclo- 8.4 9.7 9.1 9.4 12.6 14.7 6.1hexanesDimethyldecalins 49.4 45.8 47.6 45.0 40.5 30.9 10.1(DMD)Higher (C.sub.12.sup.+) 3.0 4.5 5.3 6.8 3.5 1.6 6.5Selectivity for 74.8 69.4 68.9 67.0 62.2 50.8 13.4DMD, wt %.sup.d______________________________________ .sup.a Reaction conditions, T = 21 .+-. 2.degree. C., MCP/1hexene = 2.0 (molar); reactants addition rate = 0.32 g/min. .sup.b Hydrogen transfer products (predominantly branched hexanes). .sup.c Branched dodecanes. .sup.d Selectivity of MCP conversion into dimethyldecalins (excluding the C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 hydrogen transfer products).
TABLE 12__________________________________________________________________________Effect of Catalyst/Reactant Volume Ratio upon the Dehydrodimerization(DHD) vs.Ring Alkylation Selectivity in Reaction of Methylcyclopentane__________________________________________________________________________(MCP).sup.aExperiment no. 42 43 44 12 11 45 46H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 /reactant vol. ratio 0.22 0.45 0.74 1.10 1.14 1.49 1.97Reactant added, gMCP 36 36 36 36 36 36 361-Hexene 18 18 18 18 18 18 18Catalyst, 396% H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 30.8 61.3 102.5 151.5 157.4 206.1 271.5Product recovered, gHydrocarbons 44.6 49.3 49.5 49.7 49.6 49.4 50Acid layer 38.2 64.8 105.7 154.2 159.6 209 272.5Losses 2.0 1.1 1.3 1.6 2.2 1.7 4.0MCP conversion, wt % 64.6 67.3 72.4 74.6 74.1 72.3 70.3Product distribution, wt %C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 Hydrocarbons.sup.b 28.5 33.8 31.1 31.1 30.9 33.7 38.5C.sub.7 -C.sub.11 Hydrocarbons 2.5 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.1Hydrodimers (C.sub.12 H.sub.26).sup.c 7.0 3.9 3.6 3.4 3.8 3.5 3.2C.sub.12 Alkylcyclohexanes 17.6 9.6 8.7 8.3 9.1 7.8 6.6Dimethyldecalins (DMD) 37.0 44.8 46.2 47.0 47.6 48.9 47.7Higher (C.sub.12.sup. +) 7.4 6.5 8.8 8.6 7.1 4.6 2.9Selectivity for DMD, wt %.sup.d 51.7 67.7 67.1 68.2 68.9 73.7 77.6__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Reaction conditions: MCP/1hexene = 2.0 (molar); reactants addition rate = 0.3 g/min; T = 22 .+-. 2.degree. C. .sup.b Hydrogen transfer products (predominantly branched hexanes). .sup.c Branched dodecanes. .sup.d Selectivity of MCP conversion into dimethyldecalins (excluding the C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 hydrogen transfer products).
TABLE 13______________________________________Reaction of Methylcyclopentane (MCP) in the Presence of1-Hexene with an AlCl.sub.3 -Sulfonic Acid Resin Complex as______________________________________CatalystExperiment no. 47 48 49 50Reactant added, gMCP 22 22 1.25 181-Hexene 11 11 11.28 9Catalyst, g 5.0 11.9 3.9 10MCP/1-Hexene (molar) 2.0 2.0 0.11 2.0Reaction temperature, .degree.C. 26 45 58 115..sup.a1-Hexene addition rate, g/min 0.256 0.114 -- --Product recovered, gHydrocarbons 29 27 9.13 22Acid layer 6.0 14.5 6.03 13.5Losses 3.0 3.4 1.27 1.5MCP conversion, wt % 11.4 17.1 -- 17.1Product distribution, wt %C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 Hydrocarbons 2.4 0.7 1.5 13.8C.sub.7 -C.sub.11 Hydrocarbons 2.7 1.1 34.3 18.2Hydrodimers (C.sub.12 H.sub.26) -- -- -- 1.2C.sub.12 Alkylcyclohexanes 83.0 92.2.sup.b 64.2 15.6Dimethyldecalins (DMD) -- -- -- 27.2Higher (C.sub.12.sup.+) 11.9 6.0 -- 24.0______________________________________ .sup.a The experiments run was performed at a 150 cm.sup.3 autoclave unde nitrogen at a pressure of 1100 psig. .sup.b Methylpentylcyclohexanes are the principal product.
TABLE 14__________________________________________________________________________Effect of Catalyst Type upon the Extent of Dehydrodimerization (DHD) vs.Ring Alkylation in the Reaction of Methylcyclopentane (MCP)__________________________________________________________________________Experiment no. 50 51 52 53 54 55Reactant added, gMCP 18 17.3 14 13.3 14 13.71-Hexene 9 8.7 7 6.7 7 6.8Catalyst, g 10 10.7 6.1 1.65 5.4 8.95Catalyst Type AlCl.sub.3 - Mobil RE.sup.+3- Hydroxy-Al.sub.13 SiO.sub.2 -- H.sub.3 PO.sub.4 on sulfonic Dura- exchanged pillared La- Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 Kieselguhr acid resin bead #8 Y-zeolite montmorillonitePressure, psig 1100 1950 1800 1700 2050 2100Reaction temperature, .degree.C. 115 190 195 190 190 225Duration time, hrs 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 3.0Product recovered, gHydrocarbons 22 22 14 16 13 16Catalysts 13.5 11.0 8.5 3.0 7.3 9.5Losses 1.5 3.7 4.4 2.65 6.1 3.95MCP conversion, wt %.sup.a 17.1 25.4 34.6 17.7 42.5 24.9Product distribution, wt %C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 Hydrocarbons 13.8 17.7 11.9 21.7 27.4 38.7C.sub.7 - C.sub.11 Hydrocarbons 18.2 4.4 13.4 7.0 7.3 9.8Hydrodimers (C.sub.12 H.sub.26) 1.2 3.5 3.0 2.2 4.7 7.8C.sub.12 Alkylcyclohexanes 15.6 54.7 50.0 49.9 42.1 31.5Dimethyldecalins (DMD) 27.2 0.5 6.0 3.8 1.3 7.2Higher (C.sub.12.sup.+) 24.0 19.2 15.8 15.4 17.2 5.0__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a The MCP conversions in runs 51-55 were less accurately determined than in run 50, because the mass balance in these runs was only in the range of 71-87%.
TABLE 15______________________________________Effect of Cetylamine Additive upon theDehydrodimerization (DHD) vs AlkylationSelectivity in the Reaction of Methylcyclopentane (MCP).sup.a______________________________________Experiment no. 12 56 57Reactant added, gMCP 36 36 361-Hexene 18 18 18Catalyst, g 96% H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 151.5 157.6 160Cetylamine, additive, g 0 0.016 0.032Product recovered, gHydrocarbons 49.7 49.9 53.7.sup.bAcid layer 154.2 159.1 158LossesMCP conversion, wt % 74.6 74.5 74.0.sup.cProduct distribution, wt %C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 Hydrocarbons.sup.d 31.1 31.0 31.4C.sub.7 -C.sub.11 Hydrocarbons.sup.e 1.5 1.4 1.5Hydrodimers (C.sub.12 H.sub.26).sup.f 3.4 3.3 3.2C.sub.12 Alkylcyclohexanes 8.3 8.3 7.9Dimethyldecalins (DMD) 47.0 50.9 49.6Higher (C.sub.12.sup.+) 8.6 5.1 6.4Selectivity for DMD, wt %.sup.g 68.2 73.8 72.4______________________________________ .sup.a Reaction conditions: MCP/1hexene = 2.0 (molar); T .congruent. 23 .+-. 2.degree. C.; reactants addition rate .congruent. 0.3 g/min. .sup.b Includes some alkylsulfate or dialkylsulfate (alkyl esters). .sup.c Estimated value. .sup.d Hydrogen transfer products (predominantly branched hexanes). .sup.e Mostly alkylcyclohexanes. .sup.f Branched dodecanes. .sup.g Selectivity of MCP conversion into dimethyldecalins (excluding the C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 hydrogen transfer products).
TABLE 16______________________________________Effect of CF.sub.3 SO.sub.3 H Promoter uponthe Dehydrodimerization (DHD) vs. AlkylationSelectivity in the Reaction of Methylcyclopentane (MCP).sup.a______________________________________Experiment no. 11 12 58 59 60Reactant added, gMCP 36 36 36 36 361-Hexene 18 18 18 18 18Catalyst, g 157.4 151.5 156.8 153.6 150.496% H.sub.2 SO.sub.4Promoter, g 0 0 3.2 6.4 9.6CF.sub.3 SO.sub.3 HProduct recovered, gHydrocarbons 49.5 49.7 49.6 49.3 48.9Acid layer 159.5 154.2 161.8 162.3 162.1Losses 2.3 1.6 2.0 2.4 3.0MCP conversion, 74.1 74.6 72.9 73.2 74.4wt %Productdistribution, wt %C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 30.9 31.1 32.2 31.8 31.3Hydrocarbons.sup.bC.sub.7 -C.sub.11 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.7HydrocarbonsHydrodimers 3.8 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.5(C.sub.12 H.sub.26).sup.cC.sub.12 Alkylcyclo- 9.1 8.3 8.6 8.9 8.5hexanesDimethyldecalins 47.6 47.0 47.4 49.0 48.3(DMD)Higher (C.sub.12.sup.+) 7.1 8.6 6.7 4.9 6.7Selectivity for 68.9 68.2 69.9 71.8 70.3DMD, wt %.sup.d______________________________________ .sup.a Reaction conditions: MCP/1hexene = 2.0 (molar); T = 21 .+-. 2.degree. C.; reactants addition rate = 0.32 g/min. .sup.b Hydrogen transfer products (predominantly branched hexanes). .sup.c Branched dodecanes. .sup.d Selectivity of MCP conversion into dimethyldecalins (excluding the C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 hydrogen transfer products).
TABLE 17______________________________________GC/MS Results on Products from the Reactions ofMethylcyclopentane (MCP) in the Presence of 1-Hexene.sup.a MolecularProduct (type) peak, M/e Major fragmentation peaks, m/e.sup.b______________________________________2- and 3-Methyl- 86 57 (100), 56 (72), 41 (46), 43 (35),pentane 42 (4.3), 71 (4.1), 39 (3.3)C.sub.7 H.sub.16 (heptane) 100 43 (100), 32 61), 41 (40), 57 (32), 39 (8), 40 (7), 42 (5)Methylcyclo- 98 83 (100), 55 (39), 32 (33), 98 (23),hexane 42 (13), 56 (12.5), 70 (10)1,3-dimethyl- 112 55 (100), 32 (92), 97 (30),cyclohexane 112 (26), 56 (18), 41 (17), 39 (10)C.sub.9 H.sub.20 (nonane) 128 57 (100), 32 (100), 55 (59), 40 (58), 56 (30), 41 (25), 43 (9)C.sub.9 H.sub.20 (nonane) 128 57 (100), 32 (79), 55 (75), 41 (69), 56 (56), 83 (39), 71 (29), 43 (24)C.sub.9 H.sub.20 (nonane) 128 71 (100), 57 (42), 43 (19), 41 (17), 70 (15), 40 (12), 55 (10)C.sub.9 H.sub.20.sup.c (nonane) 128 43 (100), 97 (35), 57 (33), 41 (31), 55 (19), 69 (16), 40 (13)C.sub.10 H.sub.22 (decane) 142 57 (100), 56 (19), 71 (10), 40 (8), 43 (5), 55 (5)C.sub.11 H.sub.24 156 71 (100), 57 (47), 40 (35), 55 (27),(undecane) 69 (20), 41 (15), 43 (13), 111 (12)C.sub.11 H.sub.24 156 71 (100), 55 (50), 57 (48), 40 (31),(undecane) 41 (17), 43 (15)C.sub.12 H.sub.26 170 57 (100), 56 (18), 71 (12), 55 (8),(dodecane) 40 (7), 41 (5), 43 (4)C.sub.12 H.sub.26 170 57 (100), 71 (54), 56 (28), 55 (25),(dodecane) 40 (23), 83 (20), 41 (18)C.sub.11 H.sub.22 154 69 (100), 111 (23), 83 (12), 41 (9),(alkylcyclohexane) 55 (8), 57 (6), 139 (5)C.sub.12 H.sub.26 170 57 (100), 69 (21), 55 (19), 83 (13),(dodecane) 56 (12.5), 71 (12), 41 (7)C.sub.12 H.sub.26 170 57 (100), 56 (33), 71 (9), 55 (7),(dodecane) 69 (5), 43 (4)C.sub.12 H.sub.26 170 57 (100), 56 (15), 71 (12), 55 (7),(dodecane) 41 (6), 69 (5), 85 (4), 43 (4)C.sub.12 H.sub.24 (alkyl- 168 69 (100), 57 (96), 83 (25), 55 (15),cyclohexane) 56 (14), 97 (12), 153 (11)C.sub.12 H.sub.24 (alkyl- 168 69 (100), 111 (26), 57 (25),cyclohexane) 55 (15), 97 (15), 83 (12), 71 (12)C.sub.12 H.sub.26 170 57 (100), 71 (23), 69 (20), 55 (17),(dodecane) 56 (13), 70 (10), 43 (9), 70 (4)C.sub.12 H.sub.26 170 57 (100), 71 (24), 55 (22), 69 (21),(dodecane) 56 (13), 70 (11), 111 (10), 83 (10)C.sub.12 H.sub.24 (alkyl- 168 69 (100), 111 (74), 43 (13),cyclohexane) 97 (10), 41 (8), 125 (7), 83 (6), 55 (6)C.sub.12 H.sub.24 (alkyl- 168 69 (100), 125 (17), 111 (16),cyclohexane) 83 (16), 57 (10), 97 (9), 55 (7), 40 (7)C.sub.12 H.sub.24 (alkyl- 168 69 (100), 83 (16), 125 (15),cyclohexane) 111 (15), 97 (8), 55 (7), 57 (6)C.sub.12 H.sub.24 (alkyl- 168 69 (100), 83 (24), 57 (21), 55 (19),cyclohexane) 111 (14), 70 (7), 71 (7), 125 (6)C.sub. 12 H.sub.24 (alkyl- 168 69 (100), 83 (47), 97 (42),cyclohexane) 125 (38), 111 (23), 55 (15), 43 (14), 41 (12)C.sub.12 H.sub.24 (alkyl- 168 69 (100), 83 (92), 55 (43), 57 (42),cyclohexane) 97 (22), 111 (18), 56 (17), 70 (15)C.sub.12 H.sub.24 (alkyl- 168 69 (100), 55 (98), 83 (83), 57 (48),cyclohexane) 97 (23), 70 (21), 56 (18), 111 (17)C.sub.12 H.sub.24 (alkyl- 168 69 (100), 83 (59), 55 (48), 57 (30),cyclohexane) 70 (22), 111 (21), 40 (21), 97 (19)x,x-Dimethyl- 166 95 (100), 166 (51), 83 (45),decalin 69 (43), 55 (40), 109 (32), 81 (23), 67 (17)x,x-Dimethyl- 166 166 (100), 95 (96), 67 (65),decalin 81 (58), 82 (57), 109 (56), 69 (53), 151 (45)x,x-Dimethyl- 166 81 (100), 95 (88), 151 (87),decalin 55 (84), 41 (44), 96 (32), 67 (26), 166 (74)x,x-Dimethyl- 166 166 (100), 95 (92), 109 (90),decalin 71 (49), 83 (48), 67 (48), 81 (36), 68 (30)x,x-Dimethyl- 166 95 (100), 55 (38), 166 (27),decalin 109 (23), 81 (21), 69 (21), 83 (17), 151 (14)x,x-Dimethyl- 166 81 (100), 151 (51), 41 (44),decalin 67 (37), 97 (32), 95 (28), 55 (26), 82 (18)x,x-Dimethyl- 166 109 (100), 95 (64), 166 (63),decalin 69 (44), 97 (26), 67 (25), 68 (24), 82 (18)x,x,x-Trimethyl- 180 151 (100), 81 (80), 41 (57),decalin 67 (45), 95 (33), 55 (27), 97 (22), 43 (22)x,x,x-Trimethyl- 180 81 (100), 151 (55), 67 (51),decalin 41 (43), 95 (41), 69 (27), 137 (23), 109 (22)C.sub.18 H.sub.34.sup.f 250 57 (100), 83 (80), 69 (79), 95 (67), 55 (54), 71 (47), 109 (35), 97 (24)C.sub.18 H.sub.34.sup.f 250 69 (100), 109 (61), 83 (43), 97 (42), 40 (41), 95 (39), 111 (36), 125 (29)C.sub.18 H.sub.34.sup.f 250 69 (100), 109 (87), 83 (58), 95 (55), 97 (53), 111 (47), 235 (37), 123 (44)C.sub.18 H.sub.34.sup.f 250 69 (100), 109 (80), 95 (57), 83 (45), 97 (43), 111 (37), 123 (33), 125 (27)C.sub. 18 H.sub.34.sup.f 250 69 (100), 109 (95), 95 (61), 83 (44), 97 (43), 123 (40), 111 (38), 125 (28)C.sub.18 H.sub.34.sup.f 250 95 (100), 83 (67), 55 (62), 109 (60), 57 (55), 69 (54), 165 (40), 81 (18)C.sub.18 H.sub.34.sup.f 250 109 (100), 69 (83), 95 (67), 83 (37), 123 (36), 151 (33), 40 (28), 81 (17)C.sub.18 H.sub.34.sup.g 248 95 (100), 109 (38), 83 (37), 163 (36), 69 (35), 55 (31), 81 (17), 135 (16)C.sub.18 H.sub.34.sup.g 248 109 (100), 95 (70), 248 (68), 69 (48), 163 (37), 123 (36), 83 (30), 40 (20)C.sub.18 H.sub.34.sup.g 248 109 (100), 95 (66), 248 (48), 163 (32), 69 (29), 205 (27), 219 (25), 123 (25)C.sub.18 H.sub.34.sup.g 248 95 (100), 109 (79), 83 (32), 205 (25), 219 (22), 81 (21), 55 (20), 135 (19)______________________________________ .sup.a Products obtained in experiment no. 2; .sup.b Relative intensities given in parentheses (arranged in the order o decreasing intensity); .sup.c Mixture of C.sub.9 isoparaffin and C.sub.9 alkylcyclohexane; .sup.d Mixture of C.sub.11 alkylcyclohexane and C.sub.12 isoparaffin; .sup.e Mixture of C.sub.12 isoparaffin and C.sub.12 alkylcyclohexane; .sup.f Alkyldecalins; .sup.g Tricyclic naphthenes.
TABLE 18______________________________________GC/MS Results on Products from the Reactions ofMethylcyclopentane (MCP) in the Presence of 1-Hexene.sup.a MolecularProduct (type) peak, M/e Major fragmentation peaks, m/e.sup.b______________________________________Methylpentanes 86 57 (100), 56 (89), 41 (47), 43 (36), 42 (5), 71 (4), 55 (3), 39 (3)Cyclohexane 84 56 (100), 84 (78), 41 (45), 55 (15), 69 (14), 42 (12), 39 (5)Methylcyclo- 98 83 (100), 55 (79), 41 (46), 98 (43),hexane 69 (35), 56 (17), 40 (17), 42 (15)Dimethylbutyl- 168 69 (100), 111 (77), 55 (54),cyclohexane 40 (25), 57 (18), 43 (16), 83 (15), 41 (13)Dimethylbutyl- 168 69 (100), 97 (93), 55 (92),cyclohexane 111 (69), 40 (32), 83 (22), 57 (16)Dimethylbutyl- 168 69 (100), 111 (80), 55 (61),cyclohexane 40 (26), 97 (19), 83 (15), 41 (13)Methyl-n-pentyl- 168 97 (100), 55 (74), 96 (26), 69 (9),cyclohexane(1) 168 (7), 41 (5), 98 (5), 83 (5)Methyl-n-pentyl- 168 97 (100), 55 (49), 69 (12), 96 (9),cyclohexane(2) 83 (7), 41 (6), 168 (5), 43 (4)Methyl-n-pentyl- 168 97 (100), 55 (30), 96 (13), 69 (9),cyclohexane(3) 41 (7), 83 (6), 56 (6), 43 (5)Dimethyl-di-n- 252 97 (100), 83 (87), 69 (66),pentylcyclohexane 111 (63), 55 (62), 57 (50), 41 (30), 71 (29)______________________________________ .sup.a A solid catalyst (AlCl.sub.3 -sulfonic acid resin complex) was use in this run (experiment 48, Table 13). .sup.b Relative intensities given in parentheses (arranged in the order o decreasing intensity).
TABLE 19______________________________________GC/MS Results on Products from the Reactions ofMethylcyclopentane (MCP) in the Presence of 2-Pentene.sup.a MolecularProduct (type) peak, M/e Major fragmentation peaks, m/e.sup.b______________________________________2-Methylbutane 72 43 (100), 42 (100), 41 (80), 57 (66), 40 (35), 56 (16)Methylpentanes 86 57 (100), 43 (64), 41 (54), 56 (54), 42 (14), 86 (6)Cyclohexane 84 56 (100), 84 (32), 41 (20), 69 (15), 55 (14), 42 (12)Methylcyclo- 98 83 (100), 55 (31), 41 (20), 98 (18),hexane 42 (12), 69 (12), 70 (10), 56 (10)C.sub.10 H.sub.22 142 57 (100), 56 (82), 43 (56), 71 (37),(Dodecane) 40 (35), 85 (31), 41 (27), 55 (5)C.sub.10 H.sub.22 142 57 (100), 56 (86), 43 (46), 41 (43),(Dodecane) 71 (41), 40 (35), 85 (28), 55 (6)C.sub.10 H.sub.22 142 71 (100), 57 (84), 43 (72), 40 (35),(Dodecane) 70 (34), 41 (26), 113 (9), 55 (7)C.sub.10 H.sub.22 142 57 (100), 43 (43), 40 (35), 71 (26),(Dodecane) 56 (11), 41 (11), 70 (9), 85 (7)C.sub.10 H.sub.20 (Alkyl- 140 69 (100), 55 (87), 57 (71), 70 (67),cyclohexane) 56 (62), 41 (58), 83 (57), 40 (56), 125 (55)C.sub.11 H.sub.22 (Alkyl- 154 69 (100), 139 (22), 83 (21),cyclohexane) 111 (20), 55 (18), 57 (9), 41 (8), 43 (7)C.sub.11 H.sub.22 (Alkyl- 154 69 (100), 111 (28), 55 (27),cyclohexane) 41 (13), 83 (10), 110 (9), 57 (8), 154 (7)C.sub.11 H.sub.22 (Alkyl- 154 69 (100), 55 (83), 97 (46),cyclohexane) 111 (44), 41 (29), 125 (21), 40 (19), 57 (18)x,x-Dimethyl- 166 95 (100), 81 (91), 166 (73),decalin 151 (61), 55 (49), 109 (20), 96 (16), 41 (15)x,x-Dimethyl- 166 95 (100), 166 (63), 81 (54), 151 (47), 55 (45), 109 (18), 41 (15), 96 (14)______________________________________
TABLE 20______________________________________GC/MS Results on Products from the Reactions ofMethylcyclopentane (MCP) in the Presence of Cyclohexene.sup.a MolecularProduct (type) peak, M/e Major fragmentation peaks, m/e.sup.b______________________________________2-Methylpentane 86 43 (100), 42 (54), 32 (26), 71 (17.7), 41 (16), 57 (7)3-Methylpentane 86 57 (100), 32 (83), 43 (70), 41 (67), 56 (47), 42 (34), 86 (8)Cyclohexane 84 56 (100), 40 (80), 84 (77), 41 (47), 44 (39), 55 (34), 69 (30)Methylcyclohexane 98 40 (100), 83 (45), 55 (32), 44 (30), 41 (22), 98 (21), 56 (15), 42 (12)x,x-Dimethyl- 166 95 (100), 81 (97), 40 (72),decalin 166 (71), 151 (60), 41 (49), 67 (47), 109 (40)x,x-Dimethyl- 166 95 (100), 81 (84), 151 (70),decalin 166 (64), 67 (50), 55 (50), 41 (43), 39 (38)x,x-Dimethyl- 166 95 (100), 166 (97), 81 (93),decalin 67 (70), 109 (68), 55 (59), 41 (58), 96 (51)C.sub.18 H.sub.32.sup.c 248 81 (100), 95 (87), 67 (73), 41 (59), 109 (52), 248 (51), 55 (45), 69 (41)C.sub.18 H.sub.32.sup.c 248 95 (100), 81 (87), 109 (39), 55 (35), 96 (30), 248 (27), 67 (25), 69 (23)______________________________________ .sup.a Products obtained in experiment 23 (Table 6). .sup.b Relative intensities given in parentheses (arranged in the order o decreasing intensity). .sup.c Tricyclic naphthenes.
TABLE 21______________________________________GC/MS Results on Products from the Reactions ofMethylcyclopentane (MCP) in the Presence of Cyclopentene.sup.a MolecularProduct (type) peak, M/e Major fragmentation peaks, m/e.sup.b______________________________________2- and 3-Methyl- 86 57 (100), 43 (97), 41 (76), 56 (68),pentanes 42 (67), 86 (30), 55 (7), 39 (7)Cyclohexane 84 56 (100), 84 (78), 41 (44), 40 (34), 69 (31), 55 (30), 42 (24), 39 (11)Methylcyclo- 98 83 (100), 55 (73), 98 (48), 41 (34),hexane 56 (26), 70 (22), 69 (21), 40 (21)x-Methyldecalin 152 95 (100), 67 (40), 136 (31), 94 (24), 68 (21), 121 (17), 41 (17)x-Methyldecalin.sup.c 152 81 (100), 152 (92), 95 (74), 67 (64), 82 (48), 137 (45), 55 (44), 68 (36), 96 (34)x-Methyldecalin 152 152 (100), 81 (58), 95 (57), 67 (53), 82 (52.6), 96 (34), 151 (31), 55 (29)x-Methyldecalin 152 152 (100), 82 (81), 95 (76), 67 (72), 81 (64), 96 (61), 55 (40), 41 (35)Dimethyldecalin 166 95 (100), 151 (83), 166 (69), 81 (68), 40 (52), 55 (47), 67 (42), 109 (28), 82 (27)Dimethyldecalin 166 109 (100), 166 (95), 95 (80), 81 (72), 67 (57), 55 (55), 40 (52), 82 (49)C.sub.16 H.sub.28 220 95 (100), 220 (97), 135 (79), 81 (77), 67 (56), 191 (49), 55 (45), 109 (43), 41 (37)______________________________________ .sup.a Products obtained in experiment 31 (Table 7). .sup.b Relative intensities given in parentheses (arranged in the order o decreasing intensity). .sup.c Trans-anti-2-methyldecalin.
TABLE 22______________________________________GC/MS Results on Products from the Reactions ofMethylcyclopentane (MCP) in the Presence of 1-Octene.sup.a MolecularProduct (type) peak, M/e Major fragmentation peaks, m/e.sup.b______________________________________C.sub.8 H.sub.18 (Octane) 114 57 (100), 55 (13), 71 (11), 70 (10), 99 (6), 56 (5), 83 (3)C.sub.8 H.sub.18 (Octane) 114 57 (100), 85 (62), 56 (13), 84 (12), 55 (6), 71 (5.5), 70 (5)C.sub.8 H.sub.18 (Octane) 114 57 (100), 55 (93), 56 (56), 85 (53.5), 71 (53), 70 (30), 84 (16)C.sub.8 H.sub.16 (Alkyl- 112 55 (100), 97 (95), 56 (39), 69 (29),cyclohexane) 70 (28), 57 (27), 112 (16), 83 (15)C.sub.8 H.sub.16 (Alkyl- 112 83 (100), 55 (100), 56 (49),cyclohexane) 69 (28), 82 (28), 71 (27), 70 (26)C.sub.9 H.sub.18 (Alkyl- 126 55 (100), 97 (83), 57 (35), 69 (23),cyclohexane) 56 (12), 83 (12), 85 (11), 67 (6)C.sub.9 H.sub.18 (Alkyl- 126 55 (100), 57 (89), 83 (88), 82 (38),cyclohexane) 69 (31), 71 (28), 56 (27), 85 (19)C.sub.9 H.sub.18 (Alkyl- 126 55 (100), 97 (71), 57 (67), 69 (29),cyclohexane) 56 (18), 85 (14), 71 (13), 96 (10)x,x-Dimethyl- 166 95 (100), 81 (91), 67 (57),decalin 55 (56.5), 151 (53), 166 (40), 83 (38), 82 (37)x,x-Dimethyl- 166 95 (100), 81 (47), 67 (38),decalin 166 (33), 109 (33), 151 (31), 69 (31), 82 (30)x,x-Dimethyl- 166 81 (100), 109 (81), 95 (77),decalin 67 (72), 82 (60), 55 (56), 166 (55), 151 (49)x,x-Dimethyl- 166 81 (100), 67 (85), 95 (79),decalin 166 (74), 151 (72), 55 (71), 82 (66), 109 (48)x,x-Dimethyl- 166 95 (100), 109 (99.6), 69 (64),decalin 81 (59), 67 (52), 68 (46), 166 (45), 82 (40)C.sub.14 H.sub.28 (Alkyl- 196 69 (100), 83 (58), 55 (48), 97 (38),cyclohexane) 111 (35), 57 (24), 126 (16), 95 (14)C.sub.16 H.sub.34 226 57 (100), 71 (63), 85 (35), 55 (17),(Hexadecane) 56 (11), 69 (11), 70 (10), 97 (9), 99 (8)C.sub.18 H.sub.32.sup.c 248 109 (100), 81 (89), 95 (88), 55 (82), 123 (68), 67 (60), 219 (59), 248 (55)______________________________________ .sup.a Products obtained in experiment no. 34 (Table 7). .sup.b Relative intensities given in parentheses (arranged in the order o decreasing intensity). .sup.c Tricyclic naphthenes.
TABLE 23______________________________________GC/MS Results on Products from the Reactions ofEthylcyclopentane (ECP) in the Presence of 1-Hexane.sup.a MolecularProduct (type) peak, M/e Major fragmentation peaks, m/e.sup.b______________________________________2-Methylbutane 72 43 (100), 42 (85), 57 (69), 41 (61), 40 (36), 56 (10), 39 (6)Methylpentanes 86 57 (100), 56 (86), 41 (53), 43 (32), 39 (4), 55 (3.4), 42 (3)Cyclohexane 84 56 (100), 84 (76), 41 (45), 55 (35), 69 (29), 40 (27), 42 (12)Cis-1,3-Dimethyl- 112 97 (100), 55 (85), 40 (78), 41 (15),cyclohexane 112 (14), 69 (12), 56 (11), 42 (8)Ethylcyclohexane 112 83 (100), 55 (71), 57 (51), 82 (42), 41 (36), 56 (34), 112 (22), 43 (19)C.sub.9 H.sub.20 (Nonane) 128 71 (100), 57 (59), 40 (27), 43 (27), 70 (11), 41 (9), 113 (7), 55 (7)C.sub.10 H.sub.22 (Decane) 142 57 (100), 83 (75), 55 (60), 56 (59), 43 (53), 41 (41), 82 (40), 85 (32)C.sub.11 H.sub.24 156 57 (100), 40 (50), 43 (23), 71 (21),(Undecane) 56 (14), 55 (12), 41 (11), 97 (8)C.sub.12 H.sub.26 170 57 (100), 43 (76), 71 (66), 56 (57),(Dodecane) 85 (54), 41 (39), 55 (31), 69 (30)C.sub.12 H.sub.26 170 57 (100), 43 (78), 71 (76), 85 (38),(Dodecane) 41 (31), 56 (28), 40 (27), 55 (12)C.sub.12 H.sub.26 170 57 (100), 43 (32), 40 (32), 69 (32),(Dodecane) 71 (29), 55 (18), 85 (15), 83 (14)C.sub.12 H.sub.24 (Alkyl- 168 69 (100), 40 (88), 55 (41), 83 (39),cyclohexane) 97 (34), 56 (26), 41 (24), 111 (19)Methylethylbutyl- 182 69 (100), 36 (89), 111 (83),cyclohexane 55 (77), 97 (57), 41 (43), 83 (38), 125 (29)Dimethylethyl- 182 97 (100), 55 (85), 69 (72), 56 (61),propylcyclo- 111 (45), 83 (43), 41 (39), 43 (24)hexaneC.sub.14 H.sub.26 (Tetra- 194 95 (100), 69 (92), 55 (89), 81 (60),methyldecalin) 82 (60), 111 (55), 109 (51), 41 (48)C.sub.14 H.sub.26 (Tetra- 194 69 (100), 55 (83), 111 (71),methyldecalin) 40 (33.2), 111 (27), 82 (26), 97 (24), 81 (22)______________________________________ .sup. a Products obtained in experiment no. 36 (Table 10). .sup.b Relative intensities given in parentheses (arranged in the order o decreasing intensity).

Number	Name	Date
3773652	Dille et al.	Nov 1973
4286109	Norton et al.	Aug 1981
4604490	Yuasa et al.	Aug 1986
4812146	Jessup	Mar 1989
5076813	Alberici et al.	Dec 1991

Method of making jet fuel compositions via a dehydrocondensation reaction process

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Government Interests

US Referenced Citations (5)

Foreign Referenced Citations (1)