Method of making magnetizable abrasive particles

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10655038
  • Patent Number
    10,655,038
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, October 5, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 19, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A method of making magnetizable abrasive particles includes providing a slurry layer disposed on a substrate. The slurry layer has an exposed surface and comprises magnetic particles, a binder precursor, and a liquid vehicle. Abrasive particles are electrostatically contacted with the slurry layer such that they are aligned substantially oriented perpendicular to the surface of the substrate, and are partially embedded within the slurry layer. The liquid vehicle is at least partially removed from the slurry layer and the binder precursor is converted into a binder to provide a magnetizable layer comprising the magnetic particles partially embedded in the binder. The magnetizable abrasive particles are separated from the releasable substrate. Each magnetizable abrasive particle respectively comprises a portion of the magnetizable layer disposed on a portion of an abrasive particle.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure broadly relates to methods of making magnetizable abrasive particles.


BACKGROUND

Various types of abrasive articles are known in the art. For example, coated abrasive articles generally have abrasive particles adhered to a backing by a resinous binder material. Examples include sandpaper and structured abrasives having precisely shaped abrasive composites adhered to a backing. The abrasive composites generally include abrasive particles and a resinous binder.


Bonded abrasive particles include abrasive particles retained in a binder matrix that can be resinous or vitreous. Examples include, grindstones, cutoff wheels, hones, and whetstones.


Precise placement and orientation of abrasive particles in abrasive articles such as, for example, coated abrasive articles and bonded abrasive articles has been a source of continuous interest for many years.


For example, coated abrasive articles have been made using techniques such as electrostatic coating of abrasive particles have been used to align crushed abrasive particles with the longitudinal axes perpendicular to the backing. Likewise, shaped abrasive particles have been aligned by mechanical methods as disclosed in U. S. Pat. Appl. Publ. No. 2013/0344786 A1 (Keipert).


Precise placement and orientation of abrasive particles in bonded abrasive articles has been described in the patent literature. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 1,930,788 (Buckner) describes the use of magnetic flux to orient abrasive grain having a thin coating of iron dust in bonded abrasive articles. Likewise, British (GB) Pat. No. 396,231 (Buckner) describes the use of a magnetic field to orient abrasive grain having a thin coating of iron or steel dust to orient the abrasive grain in bonded abrasive articles. Using this technique, abrasive particles were radially oriented in bonded wheels.


U. S. Pat. Appl. Publ. No. 2008/0289262 A1 (Gao) discloses equipment for making abrasive particles in even distribution, array pattern, and preferred orientation. Using electric current to form a magnetic field causing acicular soft magnetic metallic sticks to absorb or release abrasive particles plated with soft magnetic materials.


SUMMARY

While depositing a layer of magnetizable material onto abrasive particles using bulk techniques such as solution coating, powder coating, or vapor coating is typically relatively straightforward, it is much more difficult to deposit the magnetizable material at a precise location on only a portion of the surface of abrasive particle. The problem is compounded when factors such as reproducibility, productivity, and cost are taken into account. Advantageously, the present method of making magnetizable abrasive particles overcomes these problems.


In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method of making magnetizable abrasive particles, the method comprising sequentially:


providing a slurry layer disposed on a releasable substrate, wherein the slurry layer has an exposed surface, and wherein the slurry layer comprises magnetic particles, a binder precursor, and a liquid vehicle;


electrostatically contacting abrasive particles with the slurry layer, wherein the abrasive particles are aligned substantially oriented perpendicular to the surface of the releasable substrate, and wherein the abrasive particles are partially embedded within the slurry layer;


at least partially removing the liquid vehicle from the slurry layer and converting the binder precursor into a binder to provide a magnetizable layer comprising the magnetic particles and the binder, wherein the abrasive particles are partially embedded the magnetizable layer;


separating the magnetizable abrasive particles from the releasable substrate, wherein the magnetizable abrasive particles each respectively comprise a portion of the magnetizable layer disposed on a portion of one of the abrasive particles.


As used herein:


The term “ceramic” refers to any of various hard, brittle, heat- and corrosion-resistant materials made of at least one metallic element (which may include silicon) combined with oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, or sulfur. Ceramics may be crystalline or polycrystalline, for example.


The term “ferrimagnetic” refers to materials that exhibit ferrimagnetism. Ferrimagnetism is a type of permanent magnetism that occurs in solids in which the magnetic fields associated with individual atoms spontaneously align themselves, some parallel, or in the same direction (as in ferromagnetism), and others generally antiparallel, or paired off in opposite directions (as in antiferromagnetism). The magnetic behavior of single crystals of ferrimagnetic materials may be attributed to the parallel alignment; the diluting effect of those atoms in the antiparallel arrangement keeps the magnetic strength of these materials generally less than that of purely ferromagnetic solids such as metallic iron. Ferrimagnetism occurs chiefly in magnetic oxides known as ferrites. The spontaneous alignment that produces ferrimagnetism is entirely disrupted above a temperature called the Curie point, characteristic of each ferrimagnetic material. When the temperature of the material is brought below the Curie point, ferrimagnetism revives.


The term “ferromagnetic” refers to materials that exhibit ferromagnetism. Ferromagnetism is a physical phenomenon in which certain electrically uncharged materials strongly attract others. In contrast to other substances, ferromagnetic materials are magnetized easily, and in strong magnetic fields the magnetization approaches a definite limit called saturation. When a field is applied and then removed, the magnetization does not return to its original value. This phenomenon is referred to as hysteresis. When heated to a certain temperature called the Curie point, which is generally different for each substance, ferromagnetic materials lose their characteristic properties and cease to be magnetic; however, they become ferromagnetic again on cooling.


The terms “magnetic” and “magnetized” mean being ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic at 20° C., or capable of being made so, unless otherwise specified. Preferably, magnetizable layers according to the present disclosure either have, or can be made to have by exposure to an applied magnetic field, a magnetic moment of at least 0.001 electromagnetic units (emu), more preferably at least 0.005 emu, more preferably 0.01 emu, up to an including 0.1 emu, although this is not a requirement.


The term “magnetic field” refers to magnetic fields that are not generated by any astronomical body or bodies (e.g., Earth or the sun). In general, magnetic fields used in practice of the present disclosure have a field strength in the region of the magnetizable abrasive particles being oriented of at least about 10 Gauss (1 mT), preferably at least about 100 Gauss (10 mT).


The term “magnetizable” means capable of being magnetized or already in a magnetized state.


The term “shaped abrasive particle” refers to a ceramic abrasive particle that has been intentionally shaped (e.g., extruded, die cut, molded, screen-printed) at some point during its preparation such that the resulting ceramic body is non-randomly shaped. The term “shaped abrasive particle” as used herein excludes ceramic bodies obtained by a mechanical crushing or milling operation.


The term “platey crushed abrasive particle”, which refers to a crushed abrasive particle resembling a platelet and/or flake that is characterized by a thickness that is less than the width and length. For example, the thickness may be less than ½, ⅓, ¼, ⅕, ⅙, 1/7, ⅛, 1/9, or even less than 1/10 of the length and/or width. Likewise, the width may be less than ½, ⅓, ¼, ⅕, ⅙, 1/7, ⅛, 1/9, or even less than 1/10 of the length.


The term “essentially free of” means containing less than 5 percent by weight (e.g., less than 4, 3, 2, 1, 0.1, or even less than 0.01 percent by weight, or even completely free) of, based on the total weight of the object being referred to.


The terms “precisely-shaped abrasive particle” refers to an abrasive particle wherein at least a portion of the abrasive particle has a predetermined shape that is replicated from a mold cavity used to form a precursor precisely-shaped abrasive particle that is sintered to form the precisely-shaped abrasive particle. A precisely-shaped abrasive particle will generally have a predetermined geometric shape that substantially replicates the mold cavity that was used to form the abrasive particle.


The term “length” refers to the longest dimension of an object.


The term “width” refers to the longest dimension of an object that is perpendicular to its length.


The term “thickness” refers to the longest dimension of an object that is perpendicular to both of its length and width.


The term “aspect ratio” refers to the ratio length/thickness of an object.


The term “substantially” means within 35 percent (preferably within 30 percent, more preferably within 25 percent, more preferably within 20 percent, more preferably within 10 percent, and more preferably within 5 percent) of the attribute being referred to.


Features and advantages of the present disclosure will be further understood upon consideration of the detailed description as well as the appended claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic process flow diagram of an exemplary method 10 of making magnetizable abrasive particles according to the present disclosure.



FIG. 2 is a digital photograph of a magnetizable abrasive particle produced in Example 1.





It should be understood that numerous other modifications and embodiments can be devised by those skilled in the art, which fall within the scope and spirit of the principles of the disclosure. The figure may not be drawn to scale.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Methods according to the present disclosure include a series of sequential steps, which may be consecutive or not.


Referring now to FIG. 1, in exemplary method 10 according to the present disclosure, releasable substrate 20 is advanced along a web path 22 past a coater 24 which applies a curable slurry 26 forming a slurry layer 28 on a first major surface 30 of the backing thereby creating a coated substrate 32. The curable slurry 26 and slurry layer 28 comprise magnetic particles, a binder precursor, and a liquid vehicle (each not shown). The coated substrate 32 is guided along the web path 22 by appropriate guide rolls 33 such that the coated substrate is positioned above and generally parallel to a conveyor belt 34 with the slurry layer 28 on the substrate 20 facing the conveyor belt. Located prior to an electrostatic field generating apparatus 36, with respect to the conveyor belt's direction of travel 38, a particle feeder 40 applies a layer 44 of abrasive particles 42 (shown as triangular abrasive platelets) onto a support surface 48 of the conveyor belt. After application of the abrasive particles, the conveyor belt 34 moves the particle layer through an electrostatic field created by the electrostatic field generating apparatus 36. The coated substrate 32 is also guided by the web path 22 through the electrostatic field above the conveyor belt. Electrostatic field generating apparatus 36 has positive electrode 54 and ground (or negative) electrode 56. As it passes through electrostatic field generating apparatus 36, abrasive particles 42 are drawn upward toward electrode 56 until they become partially embedded into slurry layer 28. The embedded particles are then transported to oven 50 where the liquid vehicle of the slurry is at least partially (preferably essentially completely) removed and the binder precursor is converted into a binder, thereby forming magnetizable layer. Next, magnetizable abrasive particles 80 are separated from releasable substrate 20 and isolated in collection bin 60. Any excess magnetizable layer particles or coating on the abrasive particles may be separated from the magnetizable abrasive particles at this point; e.g., by sieving, agitation, magnetic field, or other suitable technique.


More generally, in a first step, a slurry layer disposed on a releasable substrate is provided. The slurry layer has an exposed surface, and comprises magnetizable particles, a binder precursor, and a liquid vehicle. Typically, the magnetizable particles and binder precursor are well-dispersed in the liquid vehicle, although this is not a requirement. Methods for preparing and coating slurries are well-known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Examples of suitable mixers useful for preparing slurries include high shear mixers. Examples of coating techniques include roll-coating, knife coating, and gravure coating. The thickness of the coating is preferably from 1/10 to ¼ of the height of the abrasive particles after they are embedded in the slurry, although this is not a requirement.


The magnetic particles comprise magnetizable material such as, for example: iron; cobalt; nickel; various alloys of nickel and iron marketed as Permalloy in various grades; various alloys of iron, nickel and cobalt marketed as Fernico, Kovar, FerNiCo I, or FerNiCo II; various alloys of iron, aluminum, nickel, cobalt, and sometimes also copper and/or titanium marketed as Alnico in various grades; alloys of iron, silicon, and aluminum (typically about 85:9:6 by weight) marketed as Sendust alloy; Heusler alloys (e.g., Cu2MnSn); manganese bismuthide (also known as Bismanol); rare earth magnetizable materials such as gadolinium, dysprosium, holmium, europium oxide, alloys of neodymium, iron and boron (e.g., Nd2Fe14B), and alloys of samarium and cobalt (e.g., SmCo5); MnSb; MnOFe2O3; Y3Fe5O12; CrO2; MnAs; ferrites such as ferrite, magnetite; zinc ferrite; nickel ferrite; cobalt ferrite, magnesium ferrite, barium ferrite, and strontium ferrite; yttrium iron garnet; and combinations of the foregoing. In some preferred embodiments, the magnetizable material comprises at least one metal selected from iron, nickel, and cobalt, an alloy of two or more such metals, or an alloy of at one such metal with at least one element selected from phosphorus and manganese. In some preferred embodiments, the magnetizable material is an alloy containing 8 to 12 weight percent (wt. %) of aluminum, 15 to 26 wt. % of nickel, 5 to 24 wt. % of cobalt, up to 6 wt. % of copper, up to 1 wt. % of titanium, wherein the balance of material to add up to 100 wt. % is iron.


The magnetizable particles may have any size, but are preferably much smaller than the abrasive particles as judged by average particle diameter, preferably 4 to 2000 times smaller, more preferably 100 to 2000 times smaller, and even more preferably 500 to 2000 times smaller, although other sizes may also be used. In this embodiment, the magnetizable particles may have a Mohs hardness of less than 6 (e.g., less than 5, or less than 4), although this is not a requirement.


Exemplary binder precursors include organic binder precursors such as thermosetting resins and thermoplastics. Exemplary organic binder precursors include glues, phenolic resins, aminoplast resins, urea-formaldehyde resins, melamineformaldehyde resins, urethane resins, acrylic resins (e.g., aminoplast resins having pendant α,β-unsaturated groups, acrylated urethanes, acrylated epoxy resins, acrylated isocyanurates), acrylic monomer/oligomer resins, epoxy resins (including bismaleimide and fluorene-modified epoxy resins), isocyanurate resins, an combinations thereof. Curatives such as thermal initiators, catalysts, photoinitiators, hardeners, and the like may be added to the organic binder precursor, typically selected and in an effective amount according to the resin system chosen, and their use is within the level of skill of those practicing in the art. Exemplary thermoplastic resins may include thermoplastic acrylic polymers and thermoplastic polyurethanes. Appropriate curative(s), if any, for the selected resin may be included in the slurry.


Preferably, the slurry should be sufficiently viscous that sagging of the particles after embedding in the slurry layer to become less oriented is minimized, although some degree of such sagging may be acceptable.


The liquid vehicle may be any liquid that can be removed from the slurry composition. Typically, the liquid vehicle may be a liquid vehicle such as water or a mixture of water and a miscible volatile organic solvent or solvents (e.g., methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, glyme, diglyme, propylene glycol, and/or acetone).


The releasable substrate is selected such that when liquid vehicle is removed and the binder precursor is converted into binder to form the magnetizable layer, the magnetizable layer can be released from the substrate, preferably cleanly released. Exemplary releasable substrates include webs and films of polyolefin (e.g., polyethylene, polypropylene), fluoropolymer (e.g., polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE), fluorinated ethylene-propylene polymer (FEP), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), and hexafluoropropylene films (HFP)), silicone, siliconized polyester, and siliconized paper. Webs and films of other materials that are not particularly releasable may also be used; for example, with a surface-applied mold release treatment.


In a second step, abrasive particles are electrostatically contacted with the slurry layer. By the term “electrostatically contacted”, it is meant that the abrasive particles are urged while influenced by electrostatic interaction toward the slurry layer until contact is achieved and the particles become partially embedded in the slurry layer. Typically, this is done by electrostatically urging the abrasive particles onto the slurry while it is within an applied electrostatic field. Due to orientation of the abrasive particles that occurs during electrostatic deposition of the abrasive particles, they can be preferentially aligned substantially oriented with their longitudinal axis perpendicular to the surface of the slurry layer in the case of needle-shaped abrasive particles, or with major planar surfaces oriented perpendicular to the surface of the substrate in the case of platelets or similar shapes. In embodiments wherein the abrasive particles are precisely-shaped truncated trigonal pyramids, the particles typically contact the slurry layer along one edge with the triangular faces oriented substantially parallel to the applied electrostatic filed, which is preferably perpendicular to the slurry layer.


Electrostatic deposition of abrasive particles onto a curable layer (e.g., a make coat) is well-known in the abrasive art (e.g., see U.S. Pat. No. 2,318,570 (Carlton) and U.S. Pat. No. 8,869,740 (Moren et al.)), and analogous technique wherein the slurry layer is substituted for the curable layer is effective for accomplishing electrostatic deposition of abrasive particles.


The abrasive particles can be particles of any abrasive material. Useful abrasive materials that can be used include, for example, fused aluminum oxide, heat treated aluminum oxide, white fused aluminum oxide, ceramic aluminum oxide materials such as those commercially available as 3M CERAMIC ABRASIVE GRAIN from 3M Company of St. Paul, Minn., black silicon carbide, green silicon carbide, titanium diboride, boron carbide, tungsten carbide, titanium carbide, cubic boron nitride, garnet, fused alumina zirconia, sol-gel derived ceramics (e.g., alumina ceramics doped with chromia, ceria, zirconia, titania, silica, and/or tin oxide), silica (e.g., quartz, glass beads, glass bubbles and glass fibers), feldspar, or flint. Examples of sol-gel derived crushed ceramic particles can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,314,827 (Leitheiser et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,623,364 (Cottringer et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 4,744,802 (Schwabel), U.S. Pat. No. 4,770,671 (Monroe et al.); and U.S. Pat. No. 4,881,951 (Monroe et al.). Further details concerning methods of making sol-gel-derived abrasive particles can be found in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,314,827 (Leitheiser), U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,917 (Pieper et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,213,591 (Celikkaya et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,816 (Spurgeon et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,672,097 (Hoopman et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,946,991 (Hoopman et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,975,987 (Hoopman et al.), and U.S. Pat. No. 6,129,540 (Hoopman et al.), and in U. S. Publ. Pat. Appln. Nos. 2009/0165394 A1 (Culler et al.) and 2009/0169816 A1 (Erickson et al.).


The abrasive particles may be shaped (e.g., precisely-shaped) or random (e.g., crushed and/or platey). Shaped abrasive particles and precisely-shaped abrasive particles may be prepared by a molding process using sol-gel technology as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,201,916 (Berg), U.S. Pat. No. 5,366,523 (Rowenhorst (Re 35,570)), U.S. Pat. No. 5,984,988 (Berg), U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,531 (Adefris et al.), and U. S. Pat. Appln. Publ. No. 2010/0146867 (Boden et al.).


U.S. Pat. No. 8,034,137 (Erickson et al.) describes alumina particles that have been formed in a specific shape, then crushed to form shards that retain a portion of their original shape features. In some embodiments, the abrasive particles are precisely-shaped (i.e., the abrasive particles have shapes that are at least partially determined by the shapes of cavities in a production tool used to make them).


Exemplary shapes of abrasive particles include crushed, pyramids (e.g., 3-, 4-, 5-, or 6-sided pyramids), truncated pyramids (e.g., 3-, 4-, 5-, or 6-sided truncated pyramids), cones, truncated cones, rods (e.g., cylindrical, vermiform), and prisms (e.g., 3-, 4-, 5-, or 6-sided prisms). In some embodiments (e.g., truncated pyramids and prisms), the abrasive particles respectively comprise platelets having two opposed major facets connected to each other by a plurality of side facets.


In some embodiments, the abrasive particles and/or magnetizable abrasive particles have an aspect ratio of at least 2, at least 3, at least 5, or even at least 10, although this is not a requirement. Preferably, abrasive particles used in practice of the present disclosure have a Mohs hardness of at least 6, at least 7, or at least 8, although other hardnesses can also be used.


Further details concerning abrasive particles and methods for their preparation can be found, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,531 (Adefris et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,891 (Culler et al.), and U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,532 (Erickson et al.), and in U. S. Pat. Appl. Publ. Nos. 2012/0227333 (Adefris et al.), 2013/0040537 (Schwabel et al.), and 2013/0125477 (Adefris).


In a third step, the liquid vehicle is at least partially removed from the slurry layer, and optionally the binder precursor is cured or otherwise hardened, and converting the binder precursor into a binder. This provides a reasonably durable magnetizable layer disposed on the embedded abrasive particles. Removal of the liquid vehicle may be accomplished using an oven or other evaporative means (e.g., forced air). Curing may be accomplished by heating (in the case of thermal cures) and/or by actinic radiation (e.g., electromagnetic and/or particulate radiation). Removal of the liquid vehicle and conversion of the binder precursor to the binder may be accomplished in the same or different steps. Preferably, curing is thermally accomplished so that a single process step is sufficient. After this point, the magnetizable layer and abrasive particles are still attached to the releasable substrate.


In a fourth step, the partially coated abrasive particles are separated from the releasable substrate to provide the magnetizable abrasive particles. Preferably, the release of the magnetizable layer may be effected by cracking the magnetizable layer (e.g., by beating and/or flexing the releasable substrate, vibration, or by winding the releasable substrate around or over a small diameter bar or roller), although other methods can also be used.


Magnetizable abrasive particles according to the present disclosure may be independently sized according to an abrasives industry recognized specified nominal grade. Exemplary abrasive industry recognized grading standards include those promulgated by ANSI (American National Standards Institute), FEPA (Federation of European Producers of Abrasives), and JIS (Japanese Industrial Standard). ANSI grade designations (i.e., specified nominal grades) include, for example: ANSI 4, ANSI 6, ANSI 8, ANSI 16, ANSI 24, ANSI 36, ANSI 46, ANSI 54, ANSI 60, ANSI 70, ANSI 80, ANSI 90, ANSI 100, ANSI 120, ANSI 150, ANSI 180, ANSI 220, ANSI 240, ANSI 280, ANSI 320, ANSI 360, ANSI 400, and ANSI 600. FEPA grade designations include F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F10, F12, F14, F16, F18, F20, F22, F24, F30, F36, F40, F46, F54, F60, F70, F80, 90, F100, F120, F150, F180, F220, F230, F240, F280, F320, F360, F400, F500, F600, F800, F1000, F1200, F1500, and F2000. JIS grade designations include 1158, JIS12, JIS16, JIS24, JIS36, JIS46, JIS54, JIS60, JIS80, JIS100, JIS150, JIS180, JIS220, JIS240, JIS280, JIS320, JIS360, JIS400, JIS600, JIS800, JIS1000, JIS1500, JIS2500, JIS4000, JIS6000, JIS8000, and JIS10,000.


Alternatively, the magnetizable abrasive particles can be graded to a nominal screened grade using U.S.A Standard Test Sieves conforming to ASTM E-11 “Standard Specification for Wire Cloth and Sieves for Testing Purposes”. ASTM E-11 prescribes the requirements for the design and construction of testing sieves using a medium of woven wire cloth mounted in a frame for the classification of materials according to a designated particle size. A typical designation may be represented as −18+20 meaning that the magnetizable abrasive particles pass through a test sieve meeting ASTM E-11 specifications for the number 18 sieve and are retained on a test sieve meeting ASTM E-11 specifications for the number 20 sieve. In one embodiment, the magnetizable abrasive particles have a particle size such that most of the particles pass through an 18 mesh test sieve and can be retained on a 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, or 50 mesh test sieve. In various embodiments, the magnetizable abrasive particles can have a nominal screened grade of: −18+20, −20/+25, −25+30, −30+35, −35+40, −40+45, −45+50, −50+60, −60+70, −70/+80, −80+100, −100+120, −120+140, −140+170, −170+200, −200+230, −230+270, −270+325, −325+400, −400+450, −450+500, or −500+635. Alternatively, a custom mesh size can be used such as −90+100.


Magnetizable abrasive particles prepared according to the present disclosure can be used in loose form (e.g., free-flowing or in a slurry) or they may be incorporated into various abrasive articles (e.g., coated abrasive articles, bonded abrasive articles, nonwoven abrasive articles, and/or abrasive brushes). Due to their magnetic properties, they can be oriented and manipulated using magnetic fields to provide the above various abrasive articles having enhanced properties.


SELECT EMBODIMENTS OF THE PRESENT DISCLOSURE

In a first embodiment, the present disclosure provides a method of making magnetizable abrasive particles, the method comprising sequentially:


providing a slurry layer disposed on a releasable substrate, wherein the slurry layer has an exposed surface, and wherein the slurry layer comprises magnetic particles, a binder precursor, and a liquid vehicle;


electrostatically contacting abrasive particles with the slurry layer, wherein the abrasive particles are aligned substantially oriented perpendicular to the surface of the releasable substrate, and wherein the abrasive particles are partially embedded within the slurry layer;


at least partially removing the liquid vehicle from the slurry layer and converting the binder precursor into a binder to provide a magnetizable layer comprising the magnetic particles and the binder, wherein the abrasive particles are partially embedded the magnetizable layer;


separating the magnetizable abrasive particles from the releasable substrate, wherein the magnetizable abrasive particles each respectively comprise a portion of the magnetizable layer disposed on a portion of one of the abrasive particles.


In a second embodiment, the present disclosure provides a method of making magnetizable abrasive particles according to the first embodiment, wherein the abrasive particles comprise shaped abrasive particles.


In a third embodiment, the present disclosure provides a method of making magnetizable abrasive particles according to the second embodiment, wherein the abrasive particles comprise precisely-shaped abrasive particles.


In a fourth embodiment, the present disclosure provides a method of making magnetizable abrasive particles according to any one of the first to third embodiments, wherein the abrasive particles respectively comprise platelets having two opposed major facets connected to each other by a plurality of side facets, wherein each magnetizable layer completely covers a respective one of the side facets.


In a fifth embodiment, the present disclosure provides a method of making magnetizable abrasive particles according to the fourth embodiment, wherein the platelets are triangular.


In a sixth embodiment, the present disclosure provides a method of making magnetizable abrasive particles according to the first embodiment, wherein the abrasive particles comprise crushed abrasive particles having an aspect ratio of at least 2.


Objects and advantages of this disclosure are further illustrated by the following non-limiting examples, but the particular materials and amounts thereof recited in these examples, as well as other conditions and details, should not be construed to unduly limit this disclosure.


EXAMPLES

Unless otherwise noted, all parts, percentages, ratios, etc. in the Examples and the rest of the specification are by weight. Unless stated otherwise, all other reagents were obtained, or are available from fine chemical vendors such as Sigma-Aldrich Company, St. Louis, Mo., or may be synthesized by known methods.


Materials used in the Examples are reported in Table 1, below.










TABLE 1





ABBRE-



VIATION
DESCRIPTION







CM
Silane Treated Calcium Metasilicate, obtained as 400



WOLLASTOCOAT, obtained from NYCO Minerals Inc.,



Willsboro, New York.


MAG1
Magnetite particles, obtained as PIROX 100 from Pittsburgh



Iron Oxides, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.


MAG2
Fe/Al/Si magnetizable alloy particles, obtained as SENDUST



from Micrometals, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.


PR
Resole phenol-formaldehyde resin, a 1.5:1 to 2.1:1



(phenol:formaldehyde) condensate catalyzed by 2.5%



potassium hydroxide.


PTFE
Polytetrafluoroethylene film with thickness of 0.015 inch



(0.038 centimeter), obtained as TFV-015-R12 from Plastics



International, Eden Prairie, Minnesota.


SAP
Shaped abrasive particles were prepared according to the



disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,531 (Adefris et al). The



shaped abrasive particles were prepared by molding alumina



sol gel in equilateral triangle-shaped polypropylene mold



cavities. After drying and firing, the resulting shaped abrasive



particles were about 1.4 mm (side length) × 0.35 mm thick,



with a draft angle approximately 98 degrees.


SUR
Surfactant, obtained under the trade designation TERGITOL



15-S-5, obtained from Dow Chemical Company, Midland,



Michigan.









Examples 1 to 7 and Comparative Example A

For each of Examples 1 to 7 and Comparative Example A, a mixture was prepared according to the composition listed in Table 2. The mixture was dispersed by a mixer operated at between 800 and 1500 revolutions per minute for approximately five minutes until the mixture was homogeneous. The mixture was then applied to a 7-inch (17.8-centimeter) diameter PTFE disc with the coating weight listed in Table 2. While the mixture was still wet, SAP were electrostatically coated on the disc (with SAP coating weight listed in Table 3), so that the majority of the abrasive particles stood in the upright direction with an edge base laying on the PTFE disc.











TABLE 2









WEIGHT PERCENT























Comparative


COMPOSITION
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Example 4
Example 5
Example 6
Example 7
Example A


















PR
42.4
40.7
42.3
42.4
42.4
42.4
40.7
54.4


MAG1
12.7
17.7
1.1
3.2
6.4
0
0
0


MAG2
0
0
0
0
0
12.7
17.7
0


SUR
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0


CM
22.7
21.8
34.4
32.2
29.0
22.7
21.8
44.2


Water
21.2
18.8
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
18.8
1.4

























TABLE 3














Comparative



Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Example 4
Example 5
Example 6
Example 7
Example A
























Mixture Coating
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.6


Weight,


Grams


SAP Coating
20.0
18.5
14.4
12.2
18.2
20.0
18.5
15.0


Weight, grams









The coated PTFE disc with abrasive particles was placed into an oven at 150° F. (65.5° C.) for 15 minutes then at 210° F. (98.9° C.) for 90 minutes. After curing, the mixture coated on the PTFE disc had a dry thickness of approximately 2 mil (0.051 millimeters). The dried PTFE disc was then crushed by hand to release the abrasive particles from the disc.


The majority of the released abrasive particles from Examples 1 to 7 had a coating on one edge with a coating thickness of 2 mil (0.051 millimeter). A photo of an edge-coated abrasive particle obtained from Example 1 is shown in FIG. 2, wherein the edge coating is on the bottom edge of the particle. The released abrasive particles resulted from Examples 1 to 7 and Comparative A were tested for their response to a Neodymium block magnet with a pull force of 73.33 pounds (326.2 Newton) and a surface field of 1152 Gauss. Their observed responses are reported in Table 4, below, wherein “strong” response means greater than 90 percent aligned, “intermediate” response means from 50 to 90 percent aligned, and “weak” response means less than 50 percent aligned.











TABLE 4







RESPONSE



















Example 1
strong



Example 2
strong



Example 3
weak



Example 4
weak



Example 5
intermediate



Example 6
strong



Example 7
strong



Comparative Example A
none










All cited references, patents, and patent applications in the above application for letters patent are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety in a consistent manner. In the event of inconsistencies or contradictions between portions of the incorporated references and this application, the information in the preceding description shall control. The preceding description, given in order to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to practice the claimed disclosure, is not to be construed as limiting the scope of the disclosure, which is defined by the claims and all equivalents thereto.

Claims
  • 1. A method of making magnetizable abrasive particles, the method comprising sequentially: providing a slurry layer disposed on a releasable substrate, wherein the slurry layer has an exposed surface, and wherein the slurry layer comprises magnetic particles, a binder precursor, and a liquid vehicle;electrostatically contacting abrasive particles with the slurry layer, wherein the abrasive particles are aligned substantially oriented perpendicular to the surface of the releasable substrate, and wherein the abrasive particles are partially embedded within the slurry layer;at least partially removing the liquid vehicle from the slurry layer and converting the binder precursor into a binder to provide a magnetizable layer comprising the magnetic particles and the binder, wherein the abrasive particles are partially embedded in the magnetizable layer;separating the magnetizable abrasive particles from the releasable substrate, wherein the magnetizable abrasive particles each respectively comprise a portion of the magnetizable layer is disposed on a portion of each of the abrasive particles.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the abrasive particles comprise shaped abrasive particles.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the abrasive particles comprise precisely-shaped abrasive particles.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the abrasive particles respectively comprise platelets having two opposed major facets connected to each other by a plurality of side facets, wherein each magnetizable layer completely covers a respective one of the side facets.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the platelets are triangular.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the abrasive particles comprise crushed abrasive particles having an aspect ratio of at least 2.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2017/055335 10/5/2017 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2018/080755 5/3/2018 WO A
US Referenced Citations (146)
Number Name Date Kind
1930788 Buckner Oct 1933 A
2216728 Benner Oct 1940 A
2318570 Carlton May 1943 A
2370636 Carlton Mar 1945 A
2527044 Walton Oct 1950 A
2857879 Johnson Oct 1958 A
2947616 Coes, Jr. Aug 1960 A
2958593 Hoover Nov 1960 A
3306719 Fringhian Feb 1967 A
3495960 Schladitz Feb 1970 A
3625666 James Dec 1971 A
3918217 Oliver Nov 1975 A
4008055 Phaal Feb 1977 A
4018575 Davis Apr 1977 A
4227350 Fitzer Oct 1980 A
4246004 Busch Jan 1981 A
4314827 Leitheiser Feb 1982 A
4331453 Dau May 1982 A
4609380 Barnett Sep 1986 A
4612242 Vesley Sep 1986 A
4623364 Cottringer Nov 1986 A
4652274 Boettcher Mar 1987 A
4652275 Bloecher Mar 1987 A
4734104 Broberg Mar 1988 A
4744802 Schwabel May 1988 A
4751137 Halg Jun 1988 A
4751138 Tumey Jun 1988 A
4770671 Monroe Sep 1988 A
4799939 Bloecher Jan 1989 A
4800685 Haynes, Jr. Jan 1989 A
4881951 Wood Nov 1989 A
4898597 Hay Feb 1990 A
4903440 Larson Feb 1990 A
4916869 Oliver Apr 1990 A
4933373 Moren Jun 1990 A
4985340 Palazzotto Jan 1991 A
4991362 Heyer Feb 1991 A
5009675 Kunz Apr 1991 A
5086086 Brown-Wensley Feb 1992 A
5137542 Buchanan Aug 1992 A
5152917 Pieper Oct 1992 A
5181939 Neff Jan 1993 A
5201916 Berg Apr 1993 A
5213591 Celikkaya May 1993 A
5236472 Kirk Aug 1993 A
5254194 Ott Oct 1993 A
5282875 Wood Feb 1994 A
5366523 Rowenhorst Nov 1994 A
5376428 Palazzotto Dec 1994 A
5380390 Tselesin Jan 1995 A
5385954 Palazzotto Jan 1995 A
5417726 Stout May 1995 A
5435816 Spurgeon Jul 1995 A
5454844 Hibbard Oct 1995 A
5500273 Holmes Mar 1996 A
5554068 Carr Sep 1996 A
5573619 Benedict Nov 1996 A
5591239 Larson Jan 1997 A
RE35570 Rowenhorst Jul 1997 E
5672097 Hoopman Sep 1997 A
5672186 Chesley Sep 1997 A
5681217 Hoopman Oct 1997 A
5681361 Sanders, Jr. Oct 1997 A
5700302 Stoetzel Dec 1997 A
5712210 Windisch Jan 1998 A
5817204 Tselesin Oct 1998 A
5833724 Wei Nov 1998 A
5851247 Stoetzel Nov 1998 A
5858140 Berger Jan 1999 A
5863306 Wei Jan 1999 A
5891204 Neff Apr 1999 A
5908476 Nishio Jun 1999 A
5928070 Lux Jul 1999 A
5942015 Culler Aug 1999 A
5946991 Hoopman Sep 1999 A
5975987 Hoopman Nov 1999 A
5984988 Berg Nov 1999 A
6017831 Beardsley Jan 2000 A
6048375 Yang Apr 2000 A
6083631 Neff Jul 2000 A
6120568 Neff Sep 2000 A
6129540 Hoopman Oct 2000 A
6139594 Kincaid Oct 2000 A
6207246 Moren Mar 2001 B1
6261682 Law Jul 2001 B1
6293980 Wei Sep 2001 B2
6302930 Lux Oct 2001 B1
6319108 Adefris Nov 2001 B1
6354929 Adefris Mar 2002 B1
6521004 Culler Feb 2003 B1
6551366 D'Souza Apr 2003 B1
6620214 McArdle Sep 2003 B2
6645624 Adefris Nov 2003 B2
6702650 Adefris Mar 2004 B2
6790126 Wood Sep 2004 B2
6817935 Bates Nov 2004 B2
6881483 McArdle Apr 2005 B2
6913824 Culler Jul 2005 B2
6951504 Adefris Oct 2005 B2
7399330 Schwabel Jul 2008 B2
7410413 Woo Aug 2008 B2
7491251 Welygan Feb 2009 B2
7727931 Brey Jun 2010 B2
7887608 Schwabel Feb 2011 B2
8034137 Erickson Oct 2011 B2
8142531 Adefris Mar 2012 B2
8142532 Erickson Mar 2012 B2
8142891 Culler Mar 2012 B2
8262758 Gao Sep 2012 B2
8425278 Culler Apr 2013 B2
8698394 McCutcheon Apr 2014 B2
8869740 Moren Oct 2014 B2
9440332 Gaeta Sep 2016 B2
20010041511 Lack Nov 2001 A1
20020160694 Wood Oct 2002 A1
20030022604 Annen Jan 2003 A1
20030143938 Braunschweig Jul 2003 A1
20050218566 Suzuki Oct 2005 A1
20050279028 Keipert Nov 2005 A1
20070254560 Woo Nov 2007 A1
20080131705 Colburn Jun 2008 A1
20080289262 Gao Nov 2008 A1
20090165394 Culler Jul 2009 A1
20090169816 Erickson Jul 2009 A1
20100146867 Boden Jun 2010 A1
20100151196 Adefris Jun 2010 A1
20110088330 Beekman Apr 2011 A1
20120137597 Adefris Jun 2012 A1
20120227333 Adefris Sep 2012 A1
20130040537 Schwabel Feb 2013 A1
20130125477 Adefris May 2013 A1
20130244552 Lee Sep 2013 A1
20130252521 Kasashima Sep 2013 A1
20130252522 Kasashima Sep 2013 A1
20130344786 Keipert Dec 2013 A1
20140000176 Moren Jan 2014 A1
20140080393 Ludwig Mar 2014 A1
20140106126 Gaeta Apr 2014 A1
20140237907 Boden Aug 2014 A1
20140259961 Moren Sep 2014 A1
20140290147 Seth Oct 2014 A1
20140291895 Kanade Oct 2014 A1
20150210910 Hejtmann Jul 2015 A1
20150267097 Rosenflanz Sep 2015 A1
20150291865 Breder Oct 2015 A1
20160221153 Rizzo, Jr. Aug 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (50)
Number Date Country
86100414 Apr 1987 CN
1830626 Sep 2006 CN
101353566 Jan 2009 CN
103590090 Feb 2014 CN
104191385 Dec 2014 CN
104822494 Aug 2015 CN
104999385 Oct 2015 CN
3042643 Jul 1981 DE
102012221316 May 2014 DE
202014101741 Jun 2014 DE
102013212609 Dec 2014 DE
102013212617 Dec 2014 DE
102013212639 Dec 2014 DE
102013212666 Dec 2014 DE
102013212684 Dec 2014 DE
1122718 Aug 2001 EP
396231 Aug 1933 GB
1477767 Jun 1977 GB
63232947 Sep 1988 JP
0778509 Mar 1995 JP
11165252 Jun 1999 JP
2002053367 Feb 2002 JP
2004098265 Apr 2004 JP
2004098266 Apr 2004 JP
2005153106 Jun 2005 JP
2006089586 Apr 2006 JP
2006206908 Aug 2006 JP
2012131017 Jul 2012 JP
2012131018 Jul 2012 JP
2015155142 Aug 2015 JP
5982580 Aug 2016 JP
1020100136807 Dec 2010 KR
101473367 May 2014 KR
1495100 Jul 1989 SU
WO 94-27833 Dec 1994 WO
WO 2009-011973 Jan 2009 WO
WO 2010-041645 Apr 2010 WO
WO 2012-112305 Aug 2012 WO
WO 2015-048768 Apr 2015 WO
WO 2015-088953 Jun 2015 WO
WO 2015-100018 Jul 2015 WO
WO 2015-100020 Jul 2015 WO
WO 2015-100220 Jul 2015 WO
WO 2017-136188 Aug 2017 WO
WO 2018-080703 May 2018 WO
WO 2018-080704 May 2018 WO
WO 2018-080705 May 2018 WO
WO 2018-080756 May 2018 WO
WO 2018-080784 May 2018 WO
WO 2018-080799 May 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
Barbee, Jr., “Microstructure of amorphous 304 stainless steel-carbon alloys synthesized by magnetron sputter deposition”, Thin Solid Films, 1979, vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 143-150.
Rampal, “Comparing the Magnetic Abrasives by Investigating the Surface Finish”, Journal of Engineering, Computers & Applied Sciences (JEC&AS), Oct. 2012, vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 20-24.
Sodium and Potassium Silicates, PQ Europe, Oct. 2004, 16 pages.
International Search Report for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2017/055335, dated Jan. 24, 2018, 3 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190270921 A1 Sep 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62412459 Oct 2016 US