1. Field of the Invention
Articles and methods consistent with the present invention relate to woven textiles.
2. Description of Related Art
Woven fabrics and knitted fabrics, as a general rule, have very different qualities. Woven fabrics such as denim gabardine, poplin, and others tend to be stable, but more rigid than knitted fabrics, and therefore do not drape well over a figure. Knitted fabrics are flexible, stretch in both the vertical and horizontal direction even if inelastic yarns are used, and drape well over the body.
Denim, an indigo dyed woven fabric, has enjoyed popularity in the fashion industry at least partly due to the ring dyeing process used in creating the indigo yarns. In general, indigo dye is located close to the surface of the yarns, leaving the core of the yarn undyed. Because the dye is located at the surface of the yarns, denim fabrics fade differently than fabrics made from non-ring dyed yarns. Additionally, different finishing techniques can be applied to denim to take advantage of these ring dyed yarns. For example, denim can be hand scraped, sand blasted, stone washed, or treated in other ways that allow varying amounts of the undyed cores of the indigo yarns to become visible. The effects created through these treatments have made denim a popular and fashionable fabric in the clothing and textile industries.
Due to denim's woven nature, it has rarely been used for tops, such as shirts, blouses and sweatshirts. On the other hand, knit indigo fabrics have failed to become popular due the expense necessary to create them. For example, to create a knit fabric, the yarns used must be wound on a bobbin. This is an expensive, additional step needed to create knitted indigo fabrics. Some have attempted to dye fabrics with indigo after knitting has taken place, but this too comes with problems. Dyeing after knitting is difficult to control due to the elastic nature of the fabric. Furthermore, both sides of the fabric end up dyed with indigo which can lead to staining if the person wearing the fabric sweats. Still others have tried dying the knitting yarns with indigo while on the bobbin, but this too gives unsatisfactory results.
An exemplary embodiment of the invention is to provide an article that looks, feels, and performs like a knitted fabric, but is created through weaving. Another exemplary embodiment of the invention is to provide a method for making such an article.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, there is provided an article comprising a fabric having a front side and a back side and including a plurality of warp yarns and a plurality of weft yarns woven together in a pattern, wherein the weft yarns include hard yarns and elastomeric yarns arranged in a predetermined arrangement comprising at least one hard yarn alternately arranged with at least one elastomeric yarn, the elastomeric yarns having a greater shrinkage ratio than the shrinkage ratio of the hard yarns, wherein the hard yarns form alternately arranged under portions and over portions with respect to said warp yarns, said under portions being formed when said hard yarns pass along the back side of the warp yarns and defining loop portions, and said over portions being formed when the hard yarns pass along the front side of the warp yarns and define connection portions, wherein for each hard yarn, an average number of warp yarns passed by the loop portion is at least 6, and wherein the elastomeric yarns form alternately arranged under portions and over portions with respect to said warp yarns in a weave that is tighter than the weave of the hard yarns.
It should be noted that while this disclosure uses the terms “elastomeric” and “hard” to describe yarns, for the purposes of this disclosure “elastomeric” simply means that the yarns have a greater shrinkage ratio than the “hard” yarns. It could very well be the case that both the “elastomeric” and “hard” weft yarns are elastic, or neither of the “elastomeric” or “hard” weft yarns are elastic.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, after the weaving, but before a shrinking, the predetermined arrangement comprises a warp density between approximately 20 and 70 warps/cm, inclusive.
According to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention after three home washes the predetermined arrangement comprises a warp density between approximately 25 and 80 warps/cm.
In yet another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, after the weaving, but before a shrinking the predetermined arrangement comprises a weft density between 20 and 70 weft/cm, inclusive.
In still another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, after three home washes the predetermined arrangement comprises a weft density between approximately 25 and 80 weft/cm, inclusive.
In a further exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the warp yarns have an English cotton number between approximately Ne 10 and Ne 40, inclusive.
Similarly, in another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the elastomeric yarns have a denier between approximately 40 and 140 denier, inclusive.
In still another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the hard yarns have an English cotton number between approximately Ne 10 and Ne 60, inclusive.
In still yet another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the warp yarns are ring-dyed indigo yarns.
In accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the invention, what is provided is an article comprising a fabric having a first weave and a second weave; wherein the first weave forms a front face of the fabric, the first weave substantially comprising warp yarns and elastomeric weft yarns tightly woven in a predetermined pattern, wherein the second weave forms a back face of the fabric, the second weave substantially comprising said warp yarns and hard weft yarns loosely woven in a predetermined pattern such that said hard weft yarns form alternately arranged under portions and over portions with respect to said warp yarns, said under portions being formed when said hard weft yarns pass along the back side of the warp yarns and defining loop portions and said over portions being formed when said hard weft yarn passes along the front side of the warp yarns and defining connection portions, wherein for each hard weft yarn, an average number of warp yarns passed by the loop portion is at least 6, wherein the elastomeric weft yarns form alternately arranged under portions and over portions with respect to said warp yarns in a weave that is tighter than the weave of the hard yarns, and wherein said elastomeric and hard weft yarns are arranged in a predetermined arrangement comprising at least one hard yarn alternately arranged with at least one elastomeric yarn, the elastomeric yarns having a greater shrinkage ratio than the shrinkage ratio of the hard yarns.
According to another exemplary embodiment of the invention, a method is provided for creating a fabric, the method comprising providing warp yarns; providing hard weft yarns; providing elastomeric weft yarns, the elastomeric weft yarns having a greater shrinkage ratio than the shrinkage ratio of the hard weft yarns; selecting a weave pattern wherein at least one hard yarn is alternately arranged with at least one elastomeric yarn, the hard yarns pass alternately along the back side of the warp yarns a predetermined number of warp yarns for each pass to form a series of hard under portions, and along the front side of the warp yarns a predetermined number of warp yarns for each pass to form hard over portions, and for each hard yarn, an average number of warp yarns passed by each under portion is at least 6, and the elastomeric yarns pass alternately along the back side of the warp yarns a predetermined number of warp yarns for each pass to form a series of elastomeric under portions, and along the front side of the warp yarns a predetermined number of warp yarns for each pass to form a series of elastomeric over portions; weaving the fabric according to the selected pattern; shrinking the woven fabric wherein the elastomeric weft yarns shrink more than the hard weft yarns causing the hard under portions to form loop portions.
The above and/or other aspects will become apparent and more readily appreciated from the following description of the exemplary embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which are depicted:
Below, exemplary embodiments will be described in detail with reference to accompanying drawings so as to be readily understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art. The inventive concept may be embodied in various forms without being limited to the exemplary embodiments set forth herein. Descriptions of well-known parts are omitted for clarity, and like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout.
An article according to a first exemplary embodiment is shown in
According to the exemplary embodiment, the weft yarns comprise elastomeric yarns 105 and hard yarns 106. In this exemplary embodiment the elastomeric yarns 105 have a greater shrinkage ratio than the hard yarns 106. The elastomeric yarns 105 and hard yarns 106 are arranged in a predetermined arrangement comprising at least one hard yarn 106 alternately arranged with at least one elastomeric yarn 105. According to the exemplary embodiment illustrated in
The weave of the fabric is such that the hard yarns form alternately arranged under portions 107 and over portions 108 with respect to the to the warp yarns 104. The under portions 107 are formed when the hard yarns pass along the backside of the warp yarns and defining loop portions 107a. The over portions are formed when the hard yarns pass along the front side of the warp yarns 104 and define connections portions 108a.
For each hard yarn 106, the average number of warp yarns 104 passed by each loop portion 107a is at least 6. The number of warp yarns 104 passed by each loop portions 107a need not be the same for all loop portions 107a, nor is it necessary that every loop portion 107a pass at least 6 warp yarns 104. So long as for each hard yarn 106 the average number of warp yarns 104 passed by each loop is at least 6, the number of warp yarns 104 passed by individual loop portions 107a can vary without deviating from the inventive concept, as would be known to one skilled in the art.
While
The elastomeric yarns form alternately arranged under portions 109 and over portions 110 with respect to said warp yarns 104 in the weave. These under portions 109 and over portions 110 form a weave with respect to the warp yarns 104 that is tighter than the weave formed by the hard yarns 106. While the weave pattern illustrated in
According to exemplary embodiments, the loop portions 107a of the hard yarns are created such that they are in substantially less tension than under portions 109 and over portions 110 created by the elastomeric weft yarns 105. It can also be the case that the loop portions 107a are in at least one of equilibrium or compression.
The loop portions 107a help to add to the knit-like appearance and behavior of the woven fabric. For example, loose loops 107a can hang loosely at the back of the fabric such that they are droopy. The droopy nature of the loop portions 107a gives the fabric a softer feel, much like that of a knitted fabric.
Also, because knitted fabrics are created by connecting yarn loops together, the loop portions 107a give the back of the fabric the appearance of a knitted fabric. In addition, because of their length and droopiness, the loop portions 107a are able to cover a substantially larger portion of the back of the fabric than if they were tightly woven against the warp yarns. This allows the loop portions 107a to substantially hide the sometimes uncomfortable under portions 109. When the loop portions 107a are made from soft cotton yarns, as would often be the case, they provide a soft, comfortable backside to the fabric.
An additional benefit of the droopy loop portions 107a is helping to prevent the warp yarns 104 from contacting the skin. This benefit is of particular importance to denim fabrics made from indigo dyed yarns. If these warps yarns 106 are indigo dyed and are allowed to come in contact with the wearer's skin, they can stain the skin when the wearer sweats.
As seen in
In exemplary embodiments, the weave pattern and/or yarn selection allows the fabric 101 to stretch in a diagonal direction with respect to the warp yarns 104 and weft yarns 105, 106.
By using diagonal patterns, multiple benefits can be achieved. First, when the warp yarns 104 are indigo dyed, the use of a diagonal pattern can give the fabric the look of a classic denim weave, while maintaining all the benefits of the feel and behavior of a knitted fabric. The diagonal patterns also allow the fabric to stretch in the diagonal direction, further adding to the knit-like behavior of the fabric.
In exemplary embodiments, the preferred warp density after weaving but before shrinking is between approximately 20 and 70 warp yarns per centimeter, inclusive. After treatment of the fabric and after three home washes, the preferred warp density is between approximately 25 and 80 warp yarns per centimeter, inclusive. It is even more preferred that the warp density after weaving but before shrinking be between approximately 25 and 60 warp yarns per centimeter, inclusive, and between approximately 30 and 65 warp yarns per centimeter after three home washes. Even more preferably, the warp density would be between approximately 30 and 50 warp yarns per centimeter, inclusive, after weaving but before shrinking, and between approximately 35 and 55 warp yarns per centimeter after three home washes. Generally, the warp and weft density measurements are made at 65% humidity, ±5%, and 20° C., ±2° C.
Similar to the warp density, exemplary embodiments can also define weft densities. It is preferred that after weaving, but before shrinking, the weft density be between approximately 30 and 90 weft yarns per centimeter, inclusive. After three home washes it is preferred that the weft density be between approximately 35 and 95 wefts per centimeter, inclusive. In preferred embodiments, it is more preferred that after weaving, but before shrinking, the weft density be between approximately 40 and 80 wefts per centimeter, inclusive. After three home washings, it is more preferred that the weft density be between approximately 45 and 85 wefts per centimeter, inclusive. It is even more preferred that after weaving but before shrinking, the weft density be between 50 and 70 wefts per centimeter, inclusive, and between approximately 55 and 75 wefts per centimeter, inclusive, after three home washes.
The selection of the warp and weft densities not only adds to the knit-like behavior of the fabric, but it also allows, in conjunction with the selection of appropriate yarns, for the creation of fabrics having different weights. For example, the weight can be chosen to be similar to that of a t-shirt, or alternatively, similar to that of sweatpants.
In exemplary embodiments, the ratio of the average number of warp yarns passed by the loop portions to a warp density is between approximately 0.2 and 0.7, inclusive.
In other exemplary embodiments, the ratio of the average number of warp yarns passed by the loop portions to the average number of warp yarns passed by the connection portions is between approximately 6 and 24, inclusive.
Another aspect of exemplary embodiments is the thickness of the yarns used for the warp and weft yarns. Because the elastomeric yarns will often be synthetic, they will be described herein using denier (den.), while the warp yarns and hard weft yarns will be described using English cotton yarn number (Ne). Not withstanding the numbering system used to described the yarns, a person of ordinary skill in the art will know how to convert from one system to the other, and would understand that the numbering system used in no way limits the properties and compositions of the yarns used.
Though not drawn to scale, it is illustrated in
By selecting the relative thicknesses of the of the yarns within the values of the inventive concept multiple benefits are achieved. For example, when the thickness of the hard weft yarns 106 is larger than that of the elastomeric weft yarns 105, the thicker loop portions 107a are better able to hide the under portions 109 from being seen and felt at the back of the fabric. The selection of correct yarn thicknesses also add to the knit-like feel and weight of the fabric.
In
In exemplary embodiments the second weave 203 substantially prevents the warp yarns 104 passed over by the elastomeric fibers 105 of the first weave 202 from being felt or seen from the back side 103 of the fabric 101.
Functional block 402 is a step in which hard weft yarns are provided. Similar to step 401, this step can include determining all the aspects of the hard weft yarns known to those skilled in the art, including but not limited to: the thickness of the yarns, shrinkage ratio, elasticity, color, weft density, etc. Functional block 403 represents a similar step with regards to the elastomeric weft yarns. In this step, all aspects of the elastomeric weft yarns can be selected.
Functional block 404 represents the step of determining a weave pattern. In this step, any weave pattern known to those skilled in the art can be selected, so long as at least one hard yarn is alternately arranged with at least one elastomeric yarn; ensuring the hard yarns pass alternately along the back side of the warp yarns in a predetermined number of warp yarns for each pass to form a series of over portions and under portions, and along the front side of the warp yarns a predetermined number of warp yarns for each pass to form hard over portions; the average number of warp yarns passed by each under portion is at least six; and the elastomeric yarns pass alternately along the back side of the warp yarns a predetermined number of warp yarns for each pass to form a series of elastomeric under portions, and along the front side of the warp yarns a predetermined number of warp yarns for each pass to form a series of elastomeric over portions.
Functional block 405 represents weaving the warp and weft yarns according to the selected weave pattern.
Functional block 406 represents the step of shrinking the fabric after weaving. During this shrinking the elastomeric yarns will shrink more than the hard yarns causing the under portions to become loop portions.
In exemplary embodiments, the loops portions are in substantially less tension than the over portions and under portions formed by the elastomeric yarns. In other exemplary embodiments the loops portions are in at least one of equilibrium and compression.
Other exemplary embodiments can add additional finishing procedures 407 to the process of creating the fabric. These steps can include applying weathering effects to the finished fabric such as bleaching, hand scraping, sand blasting, stone washing and others known to those skilled in the art. These steps can include brushing either one of the front or back side of the fabric. The process can also include printing letters or graphics onto the fabric, or embroidering patterns and logos onto the fabric. The fabric can even be ripped and torn to meet the demands of current fashion trends. The process can also include tailoring the fabric into garments, or other steps known to those skilled in the art.
What follows next are very specific examples of exemplary embodiments according to the inventive concept. The inventive concept is capable of other and different embodiments without deviating from the scope and spirit of the inventive concept. The examples should be considered illustrative in nature and not as restrictive.
The result of this exemplary embodiment is a knitted fabric having the weight and feel of a knitted t-shirt, but doing so with indigo dyed yarns which will allow for the application of abrasion effects previously only available at great cost. The warp yarns, weft yarns, warp density, weft density and loom set-up were chosen according to the values in Table 1. These selections gave the resulting fabric a weight of approximately 5-7 oz/sqyd. The weave pattern was selected according to the weave report depicted in
After weaving, the fabric was wetted and stretched in the length (warp) direction. When this happens, the fabric shrinks in the width (weft) direction, the Lycra™ (elastane) yarn pulling the warn yarns together. Because the cotton weft yarns contain no elastane, they do not shrink as much as the Lycra™ yarns, and the cotton yarn floats on the back of the fabric formed long loops which cover most of the back side of the fabric. After shrinking, the fabric was heat set to reduce shrinking in further garment washings.
The resulting fabric had the weight and feel of a knitted fabric, including the much softer feel generally associated with knitted fabrics. At the same time, the indigo warp yarns gave the warp side fabric the look and qualities of a denim fabric, such as denim's ability to take on finishing effects, such as abrasion effects. The back side of the fabric was white in color due to the un-dyed weft yarns, and was extremely soft due to the long loops created thereon. A person wearing a garment made from the fabric is prevented from feeling the uncomfortable polyester weft yarns by the long loops that dominate the back side of the fabric. The long loops also prevent the indigo from coming into contact with the skin of a person wearing the garment, preventing the indigo dye from running if the person sweats.
Due at least in part to the selection of the weave and elastomeric weft yarns, the resulting fabric had very high elastic properties. These properties included the ability to stretch in all directions, not just the weft direction.
The result of this example is a knitted fabric having the weight and feel of a knitted fabric. The warp yarns, weft yarns, warp density, weft density and loom set-up were chosen according to the values in Table 1. The weave pattern was selected according to the weave report depicted in
The result of this example is a knitted fabric having the weight and feel of a knitted fabric. The warp yarns, well yarns, warp density, weft density and loom set-up were chosen according to the values in Table 1. The weave pattern was selected according to the weave report depicted in
The result of this example is a knitted fabric having the weight and feel of a knitted fabric. The warp yarns, well yarns, warp density, well density and loom set-up were chosen according to the values in Table 1. The weave pattern was selected according to the weave report depicted in
The result of this example is a knitted fabric having the weight and feel of a knitted fabric. The warp yarns, well yarns, warp density, well density and loom set-up were chosen according to the values in Table 1. The weave pattern was selected according to the weave report depicted in
The result of this example is a knitted fabric having the weight and feel of a knitted fabric. The warp yarns, weft yarns, warp density, weft density and loom set-up were chosen according to the values in Table 1. The weave pattern was selected according to the weave report depicted in
The result of this example is a knitted fabric having the weight and feel of a knitted fabric. The warp yarns, weft yarns, warp density, weft density and loom set-up were chosen according to the values in Table 1. The weave pattern was selected according to the weave report depicted in
The result of this example is a knitted fabric having the weight and feel of a knitted fabric. The warp yarns, weft yarns, warp density, weft density and loom set-up were chosen according to the values in Table 1. The weave pattern was selected according to the weave report depicted in
The result of this example is a knitted fabric having the weight and feel of a knitted fabric. The warp yarns, weft yarns, warp density, weft density and loom set-up were chosen according to the values in Table 1. The weave pattern was selected according to the weave report depicted in
The result of this example is a knitted fabric having the weight and feel of a knitted fabric. The warp yarns, weft yarns, warp density, weft density and loom set-up were chosen according to the values in Table 1. The weave pattern was selected according to the weave report depicted in
This application claims priority from Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/308,724, filed Feb. 26, 2010, the entire disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1672186 | Wilson | Mar 1925 | A |
1965248 | Moore | Jun 1931 | A |
2330645 | Voegeli | Sep 1939 | A |
2254339 | Wylde et al. | Sep 1941 | A |
2268809 | De Roon | Jan 1942 | A |
2597580 | Gluck | May 1952 | A |
2809673 | McMurray | Jul 1956 | A |
2810281 | Appleton et al. | Oct 1957 | A |
3479245 | Manock | Nov 1969 | A |
4234022 | Okamoto et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4283194 | Teague et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4676278 | Dutt | Jun 1987 | A |
4714096 | Guay | Dec 1987 | A |
4739803 | Borel | Apr 1988 | A |
4892539 | Koch | Jan 1990 | A |
5054524 | Kato et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5067400 | Bezella et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5645924 | Hamilton | Jul 1997 | A |
5749400 | Pascual | May 1998 | A |
5837622 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5858885 | Hamilton et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6666235 | Chi et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6752840 | Onishi et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6918413 | Ono et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7299828 | Liao | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7310932 | Liao | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20060179810 | Liao | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080096001 | Emden | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080268734 | Tharpe et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090126057 | Rock | May 2009 | A1 |
20090191777 | Liao | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100093258 | Glenn et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100248574 | King et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20150159320 | Lau | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
344686 | Feb 1960 | CH |
2091299 | Dec 1991 | CN |
101328635 | Dec 2008 | CN |
1757093 | Nov 1957 | DE |
7013604 | Jul 1970 | DE |
3247651 | Aug 1984 | DE |
68911941 | May 1994 | DE |
4444825 | Jun 1995 | DE |
0327903 | Aug 1989 | EP |
1676944 | Jul 2006 | EP |
2019159 | Jan 2009 | EP |
308849 | Apr 1929 | GB |
409273 | Apr 1934 | GB |
512578 | Sep 1939 | GB |
S61282453 | Dec 1986 | JP |
H11181649 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2001295152 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002302845 | Oct 2002 | JP |
3104242 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005179796 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2009-97107 | May 2009 | JP |
2011-511888 | Apr 2011 | JP |
2004099478 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2007118672 | Oct 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cay et al.; Effects of Warp-Weft Density Variation and Fabric Porosity of the Cotton Fabrics on their Colour in Reactive Dyeing; Fibres & Textiles, Jan./Mar. 2007, vol. 15, No. 1 (60), pp. 91-94. |
Translation of DE 3247651, Tenge, Aug. 24, 1984. |
Machine translation of JP2005179796, Seki et al, Jul. 2005. |
ACP composites, http://www.acpsales.com/Woven-Fabric-Style-Guide.html, visited page on Aug. 15, 2016. |
Japanese Office Action dated Mar. 28, 2014 issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-554247. |
Third Party Submission in U.S. Appl. No. 13/580,172, filed Apr. 11, 2014. |
Notice of Opposition to a European Patent dated Nov. 5, 2015 in counterpart application No. 11706485.7. |
Specification sheet of FAENZA fabric of Nov. 7, 2007 (2 pages). |
Specification sheet of arrangement of warping and weaving of FAENZA fabric of Nov. 27, 2007 (1 page). |
E-mail correspondence between LAN. EUROPA and LINSET TEKSTIL of Sep.-Oct. 3, 2008 (1 page). |
E-mail correspondence between LAN. EUROPA and LINSET TEKSTIL of Mar. 12, 2008 (1 page). |
Order proposal No. 10347 by LAN. EUROPAto LINSET TEKSIL regarding FAENZA fabric and others of Mar. 14, 2008 (1 page). |
Specification sheet of FEP/PL fabric of Jul. 16, 2007 (3 pages). |
Specification sheet of arrangement of warp and weft of FEP/PL fabric of Nov. 6, 2007 (1 page). |
Written declaration of the facts signed by Luigi Guarducci, chairman and CEO of LAN. EUROPA (1 page). |
Book. “Large Book of textile designs” Franz Donat, 1895 (5 pages). |
Book: “Tessuti a licci”, Giacomo Airoldi, 1981 (3 pages). |
Book: “Il tessuto ordito e trama ad intreccio ortogonale”, Giacomo Airoldi, 2000 (4 pages). |
Book: “Tecnologia Tessile—Fibre—Filati—Tessuti”, Giorgio Moreschi, 1968 (6 pages). |
Pile Weaves, International Textbook Co., 1905, 36 pages. |
Notice of Opposition against EP 2539493, Wolfgang Mordhorst, Feb. 22, 2016. |
Intervention in Opposition against EP 253493, Peek et al., Dec. 9, 2016. |
Intervention in Opposition against EP 253949361, BRAX Store GmbH, et al., Sep. 21, 2016. |
Notice of Opposition against EP 20110706485, S. Mensucat, Feb. 19, 2016. |
Intervention in Opposition against EP 2539493, Calik Denim Tekstil San. ve Tic. A.S., Jun. 9, 2016. |
Intervention in Opposition against EP 2539493, Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., Nov. 8, 2016. |
Intervention in Opposition against EP 2539493 B1, Adidas AG, Jun. 23, 2016. |
Communication dated Jul. 6, 2018 from the State Intellectual Property Office of the P.R.C. in counterpart Application No. 201611241947.7. |
Communication dated Jul. 20, 2018 from the State Intellectual Property Office of the P.R.C. in counterpart Application No. 201611241942.4. |
Communication dated Sep. 3, 2018, issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of the P.R.C. in corresponding Chinese Application No. 201610094576.8. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110212659 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61308724 | Feb 2010 | US |