This application claims the benefit and priority to an International Application Number PCT/NZ2006/000258, inventor Hongzhi Gao, entitled “METHOD OF MANIPULATING VISIBILITY OF IMAGES ON A VOLUMETRIC DISPLAY” that was filed on Oct. 5, 2006 and assigned to PureDepth Limited, which further claims the benefit and priority to a New Zealand Application No. 542843 by the same inventor and the same assignee, entitled “METHOD OF MANIPULATING VISIBILITY OF IMAGES ON A VOLUMETRIC DISPLAY” that was filed on Oct. 5, 2005, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The invention relates to a method of manipulating the visibility of image elements on the screens of a multi-screen display.
Multi-screen displays including two or more screens in a stacked arrangement are known. An example of such a screen is disclosed in PCT/NZ98/00098. Multi-screen displays are capable of displaying image elements on multiple screens at the same time.
In practice, most multi-screen displays are dual screen displays having a front and rear screen in a stacked arrangement. At least a part of front screen must be capable of being made transparent so that images on the rear screen can be seen through it. In addition, at least a part of the front screen should be capable of becoming opaque, so that images on the rear screen could not be seen through it.
In this latter case, the inherent transparency of an LCD screen is problematic. LCD screens cannot be made to be 100% opaque. Accordingly, there will be leakage of images displayed on the rear screen through the front screen. Where image elements are displayed on more than one screen they may overlap and interfere with each other. This can be distracting.
Each pixel in an LCD screen stores values for colour and an additional value between 0 and 1 (alpha value). The alpha value determines how opaque or transparent the image element is in relation to other image elements that are displayed over the same pixels. For example, 40% alpha value for an image element will mean that it is 60% transparent (or 40% opaque).
All references, including any patents or patent applications cited in this specification are hereby incorporated by reference. No admission is made that any reference constitutes prior art. The discussion of the references states what their authors assert and the applicant reserve the right to challenge the accuracy and relevance of the cited documents. It will be clearly understood that, although a number of prior art publications are referred to herein; the reference does not constitute an admission that any of these documents form part of the common general knowledge in the art, in New Zealand or in any other country.
It is acknowledged that the terms ‘comprise’, ‘comprises’ and ‘comprising’ may, under varying jurisdictions, be attributed with either an exclusive or inclusive meaning. For the purpose of this specification, and unless otherwise noted, the terms ‘comprise’, ‘comprises’ and ‘comprising’ shall have an inclusive meaning—i.e. they will be taken to mean an inclusion of not only the listed components it directly references, but also other non-specified components or elements.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method to manipulate the visibility of image elements on the screens of a multi-screen display, or to at least provide a useful choice.
In one aspect the invention relates to a method of manipulating the visibility of a target image element displayed on a screen of a multi-screen display including the steps:
Preferably the characteristics of the image elements to be manipulated are selected from, but not limited to, alpha values; colour; hue; saturation; brightness; or RGB values.
Preferably the supporting image element is a shadow or a mask.
Preferably the selection of the target image element may be conducted by a user or a software programme.
Preferably where the target image element is displayed on the front screen, its visibility may be increased by:
Preferably where the target image element is to be displayed on the rear screen, its visibility may be increased by:
These techniques may be used for one or more image elements depending on the effect desired.
The method may affect all image elements on a screen or it may be limited to selected image elements or parts thereof.
Many methods of selecting image elements are known. These are useable in this invention.
Preferably the methods described above will be incorporated into an electronic form such as a software programme.
In this specification the following terms have the meanings set out below:
In the following description reference is made to a dual screen display where both screens are LCDs. The methods of the invention are applicable to any multi-screen display where the front screen or screens are capable of becoming at least partially transparent. Suitable technologies for use as the front screen of a multi-screen display include, by way of example, LCDs, TOLEDs or monochrome plasma screens.
In the following description, reference is made to white masking. Displaying white on a LCD renders the “white” portion of the display transparent. Where the front screens are not LCD a different mechanism, eg a different colour, may be required to achieve transparency. This mechanism may be used in place of the white masking to effect the method of the present invention.
Further aspects of the present invention will become apparent from the following description which is given by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The invention will be described with reference to a dual screen display having two LCD panels in a stacked arrangement. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art the invention is readily adaptable to displays having more than two screens.
The transition between these two states has two main phases:
The shadow on the rear screen is made more transparent by decreasing its alpha value. As the alpha value tends to zero the shadow becomes more transparent. As the shadow is made more transparent, the image on the back screen becomes more visible. This has the effect of making it appear that the element on the front screen is becoming more transparent. In fact the alpha value of the element on the front screen is constant.
In some circumstances, increasing the visibility of image elements on the rear screen may have the effect of increasing the apparent transparency of an overlapping target image on the front screen.
Where the alpha value of the image element on the front screen is decreased the selected image element on the front screen becomes more transparent. If there are multiple overlapping image elements on the front screen, decreasing the alpha value of the selected image element will increase the visibility of the other image elements on the front screen. If the other image elements are predominantly white or there are no other image elements then the image element displayed on the rear screen may become more visible.
An alternative way of achieving this effect is to place a white mask over the image element on the front screen. White on the front screen is transparent. So, as the alpha value of the white mask increases to 100%, the apparent transparency of the mask would increase. This would enable the image on the rear screen to be clearly visible through the front screen.
The stages transiting the shift from the opaque front screen to a complete apparent transparency are shown in
In addition, it will be appreciated that the process can be reversed to render an image element on the front screen visible in preference to an image element on the rear screen.
In
The effect of this combination is that the image element on the front screen appears to be completely opaque. No image is visible through the image element.
In
The combined effect of these actions is that the image element on the front screen appears to be partially transparent. In fact, its actual transparency is unchanged.
In
The effect of this combination however, is that the image element appears even more transparent. In fact its actual transparency is unchanged.
In
In
The effect of this combination is that the image element appears to be more transparent. So the image element on the rear screen is more easily viewed.
In
The effect is that the portion of the front screen including the image element is completely transparent. The image element on the rear screen is easily viewed through the front screen.
As will be appreciated, for clarity the transit has been described with the increasing transparency of the shadow and the image element on the front screen occurring as separate and discrete events. This need not be the case. It is possible the alpha value of the image element on the front screen may be decreased before or while the alpha value of the white shadow is decreasing. Similarly the inclusion of the white mask in front of that image element may begin while the alpha value of the white shadow is decreasing.
Manipulating the relative transparency of image elements on the front and rear screens will enable a user to select which image elements on each screen are clearly visible. Different image elements can be selected and made visible with ease. This is particularly advantageous where comparisons are being made between different documents or image elements.
The software is set up so that selection and changes in transparency are preferably manipulated by user input, for example keystrokes or mouse movements. In the preferred embodiment these are configurable by the user. It is envisioned that these may be automated to a greater or lesser extent by the use of a software programme.
Another way to achieve visibility of target image elements is to make any overlapping image element transparent.
This method is outlined in
The intersecting area can be made transparent by placing a white mask over it. The use of white on the front screen of a multi-screen display has the effect of rendering the ‘white’ portion transparent. By placing a white mask over the intersecting area the image element displayed on the rear screen becomes visible. This is clearly seen in
As can be seen on
Where the background on the front screen is white, transparency may be achieved by changing the alpha value of any overlapping image element to zero. In this case the overlapping image element will become transparent. The white background will then dominate. As white on the front screen of a multi-screen display is transparent, the selected image element on the rear screen will be visible through the front screen.
For clarity, this description has referred to single target image elements. However, multiple target image elements may be selected and manipulated using the techniques of the invention.
Aspects of the present invention have been described by way of example only and it should be appreciated that modifications and additions may be made thereto without departing from the scope thereof.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
542843 | Oct 2005 | NZ | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NZ2006/000258 | 10/5/2006 | WO | 00 | 9/17/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/040413 | 4/12/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3863246 | Trcka et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3967881 | Moriyama et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4294516 | Brooks | Oct 1981 | A |
4333715 | Brooks | Jun 1982 | A |
4364039 | Penz | Dec 1982 | A |
4371870 | Biferno | Feb 1983 | A |
4472737 | Iwasaki | Sep 1984 | A |
4485376 | Noble | Nov 1984 | A |
4523848 | Gorman et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4568928 | Biferno | Feb 1986 | A |
4649425 | Pund | Mar 1987 | A |
4757626 | Weinreich | Jul 1988 | A |
4768300 | Rutili | Sep 1988 | A |
4815742 | Augustine | Mar 1989 | A |
5050965 | Conner et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5075993 | Weinreich | Dec 1991 | A |
5112121 | Chang et al. | May 1992 | A |
5113272 | Reamey | May 1992 | A |
5124803 | Troxel | Jun 1992 | A |
5198936 | Stringfellow | Mar 1993 | A |
5298892 | Shapiro et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5300942 | Dolgoff | Apr 1994 | A |
5302946 | Shapiro et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5361165 | Stringfellow et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5367801 | Ahn | Nov 1994 | A |
5369450 | Haseltine et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5473344 | Bacon et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5515484 | Sfarti et al. | May 1996 | A |
5585821 | Ishikura et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5675755 | Trueblood | Oct 1997 | A |
5694532 | Carey et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695346 | Sekiguchi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5745197 | Leung et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5764317 | Sadovnik et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5805163 | Bagnas | Sep 1998 | A |
5825436 | Knight | Oct 1998 | A |
5924870 | Brosh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5982417 | Blonde | Nov 1999 | A |
5990990 | Crabtree | Nov 1999 | A |
5999191 | Frank et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005654 | Kipfer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6054969 | Haisma | Apr 2000 | A |
6215490 | Kaply | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215538 | Narutaki et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6341439 | Lennerstad | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356281 | Isenman | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369830 | Brunner et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388648 | Clifton et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6438515 | Crawford et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443579 | Myers | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6525699 | Suyama et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6538660 | Celi, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6587118 | Yoneda | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6593904 | Marz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609799 | Myers | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6661425 | Hiroaki | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6697135 | Baek et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6717728 | Putilin | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6720961 | Tracy | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6771263 | Behrens et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6845578 | Lucas | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6906762 | Witehira et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6940507 | Repin et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6958748 | Fukui et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7113188 | Kuroda et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7730413 | Engel et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
20020001055 | Kimura et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020093516 | Brunner et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020105516 | Tracy | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126115 | Ijntema | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020126369 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020126396 | Dolgoff | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020163728 | Myers | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020163729 | Myers | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030090455 | Daly | May 2003 | A1 |
20030132895 | Berstis | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030184665 | Berstis | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040239582 | Seymour | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050062897 | Lei | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050146787 | Lukyanitsa | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060227249 | Chen et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070024642 | Kooi et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
8248298 | Sep 1998 | AU |
2554299 | Sep 1999 | AU |
2480600 | Jul 2000 | AU |
2453800 | Aug 2000 | AU |
6821901 | Dec 2001 | AU |
2009960 | Sep 1990 | CA |
2075807 | Aug 1991 | CA |
2320694 | Aug 1999 | CA |
2329702 | Sep 1999 | CA |
1201157 | Dec 1998 | CN |
1293805 | May 2001 | CN |
1294695 | May 2001 | CN |
2730785 | Jan 1979 | DE |
29912074 | Nov 1999 | DE |
19920789 | May 2000 | DE |
0389123 | Sep 1990 | EP |
454423 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0460314 | Dec 1991 | EP |
595387 | May 1994 | EP |
605945 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0703563 | Mar 1996 | EP |
0732669 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0802684 | Oct 1997 | EP |
872759 | Oct 1998 | EP |
1057070 | Aug 1999 | EP |
1058862 | Sep 1999 | EP |
0999088 | May 2000 | EP |
1151430 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1177527 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1093008 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1287401 | Mar 2003 | EP |
2609941 | Jul 1988 | FR |
2312584 | Oct 1997 | GB |
2347003 | Aug 2000 | GB |
2372618 | Aug 2002 | GB |
93472 | Nov 1994 | IL |
61248083 | Nov 1986 | JP |
63158587 | Jul 1988 | JP |
3021902 | Jan 1991 | JP |
3174580 | Jul 1991 | JP |
3186894 | Aug 1991 | JP |
3226095 | Oct 1991 | JP |
3282586 | Dec 1991 | JP |
4191755 | Jul 1992 | JP |
4220691 | Aug 1992 | JP |
4251219 | Sep 1992 | JP |
5040449 | Feb 1993 | JP |
6317488 | Nov 1994 | JP |
8036375 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8095741 | Apr 1996 | JP |
09-033858 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9146751 | Jun 1997 | JP |
9244057 | Sep 1997 | JP |
9282357 | Oct 1997 | JP |
9308769 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10003355 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10039821 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10105829 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10228347 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-301508 | Nov 1998 | JP |
10-334275 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11205822 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000-142173 | May 2000 | JP |
2000-347645 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001-100689 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2000-99237 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001324608 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002504764 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2001-215332 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002-131775 | May 2002 | JP |
2001-56675 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002-271819 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002-350772 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002544544 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003507774 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2002-099223 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2003-316335 | Nov 2003 | JP |
11-272846 | Apr 2008 | JP |
20005178 | Apr 2001 | NO |
505801 | Aug 2002 | NZ |
505800 | Sep 2002 | NZ |
343229 | Apr 2001 | PL |
8805389 | Jul 1988 | WO |
9112554 | Aug 1991 | WO |
9847106 | Oct 1998 | WO |
9942889 | Aug 1999 | WO |
9944095 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0036578 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0048167 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0068887 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0101290 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0115127 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0115128 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0157799 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0195019 | Dec 2001 | WO |
0235277 | May 2002 | WO |
02084637 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02091033 | Nov 2002 | WO |
03003109 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03032058 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2004001488 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004102520 | Nov 2004 | WO |
9703025 | Nov 1997 | ZA |
Entry |
---|
Final Office Action Mailed Oct. 27, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 11/804,650. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/519,285 Mail Date Feb. 2, 2009. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/519,285 Mail Date May 28, 2008. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/519,285 Mail Date Sep. 17, 2008. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/528,334 Mail Date Feb. 24, 2009. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/528,334 Mail Date Aug. 5, 2008. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/841,133 Mail Date Aug. 7, 2008. |
“Clearboard 1991-1994,” http://web.media.mit.edu/˜ishii/CB.html. |
“Teamworkstation 1989-1994,” http://web.media.mit.edu/˜ishii/TWS.html. |
“TEXTARC: An Alternate Way to View a Text,” http://textarc.org, 2002. |
“TEXTARC: NYSCA Grant and Public Installation,” http//textarc.org, 2002. |
“TEXTARC: The Print and the Artist,” http://textarc.org, 2002. |
Courter et al., Microsoft Office 2000 Professional Edition, 1999, Sybex Inc., pp. xxxi, 543, 685. |
Harrison et al., “Transparent Layered User Interfaces: An Evaluation of a Display Design to Enhance Focused and Divided Attention” ACM, 13 pages, 1995. |
Ishii et al., “Iterative Design of Seamless Collaboration Media”, Communications of the ACM, Aug. 1994, vol. 37, pp. 83-97. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/489,101 Mar. 29, 2006. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/489,101 Jul. 16, 2007. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/489,101 Jul. 28, 2005. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/489,101 Nov. 22, 2005. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/519,285 Sep. 10, 2007. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/841,133 Jan. 8, 2007. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/841,133 Sep. 6, 2007. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/841,133 Nov. 28, 2007. |
“Display”, http://web.archive.org/web/20010717132509/http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9—gci211965,00.html, Jul. 27, 2000. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Feb. 16, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 12/107,589. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Jan. 11, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 10/519,285. |
Non Final OA Dated Feb. 2, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 10/519,285. |
Final OA Dated Feb. 24, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 10/528,334. |
Final Office Action Dated Apr. 15, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 10/557,157. |
Final Office Action Dated Jun. 25, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 12/107,589. |
Final Office Action Dated May 24, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 10/519,285. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated May 14, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 11/804,650. |
Final Office Action Dated Aug. 17, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 10/519,285. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Sep. 1, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 10/528,334. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Sep. 9, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 10/557,157. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Aug. 12, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 12/107,589. |
Final Office Action Dated Jun. 1, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 10/519,285. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Dec. 10, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 10/519,285. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Aug. 4, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 10/528,334. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Apr. 21, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 10/528,334. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Dec. 27, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 10/528,334. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Sep. 16, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 10/528,334. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Apr. 14, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 10/528,334. |
Final Office Action Dated Mar. 21, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 12/107,589. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Oct. 22, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 12/107,589. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Jul. 29, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 10/557,157. |
Final Office Action Dated Apr. 26, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 10/557,157. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Oct. 12, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 10/557,157. |
Supplementary European Search Report Dated Jan. 29, 2010; European Application No. EP 06-81-2833. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Dec. 3, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 10/519,285. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Jun. 27, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 10/519,285. |
Office Action Dated Mar. 19, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 10/519,285. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Dec. 9, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 10/557,157. |
Office Action Dated Aug. 24, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 11/804,650. |
Office Action Dated Sep. 4, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,039. |
Office Action Dated Mar. 27, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,039. |
Office Action Dated Aug. 17, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 12/813,173. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090213141 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |