Microelectromechanical system devices (MEMS) may be manufactured from thin film processes. These processes may involve a series of thin films deposited in layers, the layers being patterned and etched to form the devices. In order to allow the devices to move, one layer may be an isolation layer. An isolation layer is one that is used in forming the layers of the device acting as a structural member, but that may be removed when the device is complete.
Removal of the isolation layers may involve an etching process, using a material as the etchant that only acts on the sacrificial layer material. In some cases, the isolation layer may be an oxide that may be removed with a dry gas etch. Other forms of isolation layers are also possible, as are other methods of removal. The removal of the isolation layer typically results in a gap, through which a member of the device will move upon actuation.
MEMS devices often actuate through the use of electrical signals that cause a voltage differential between a first conductive layer and a second conductive layer separated by the gap. During dry, gas etching of the isolation layer, an electrostatic charge may build up on the layers, causing the movable member to become attracted to the other conductive layer. In extreme cases, the two layers may become stuck together and the device becomes inoperative. In less extreme cases, the movable element may become damaged or deformed and subsequently not operate correctly.
The invention may be best understood by reading the disclosure with reference to the drawings, wherein:
a and 6b show embodiments of an alternative apparatus to mitigate the effects of static charge during an etch process.
Upon completion of the modulator structures, such as the metal membrane 18, the isolation layer is removed. This allows portions of the membrane 18 to deflect towards the electrode layer 12 of the optical stack. In the case of interferometric modulators, the membrane 18 is attracted to the metal layer 12 by manipulation of the voltage differential between the membrane 18 and the electrode layer 12. The layer 12 and the membrane 18 may be metal, as discussed here, or any conductive material. The cell formed by the portion of the membrane shown in
During removal of the isolation layer, enough electrostatic charge can build up on the surfaces of the two conductive layers to cause the membrane to attract towards the conductive layer 14 without being activated. This condition is shown in
Removal of the isolation layer may be achieved in many different ways. Typically, it is removed with the use of a dry, gas etch, such as a xenon-difluorine (XeF2) etch. While these are examples of etching processes, any etch process may be used. It may be the dry environment that contributes to the build up of the electrostatic charge. However, it would be better to not have to change the materials or basis of the processes used to manufacture the MEMS devices, but instead to adapt the process to eliminate the electrostatic charge build up.
There are some benefits to be obtained by grounding the conductive layers during wet etch processes as well. There may be effects on the device electrochemistry that are either enabled, if desirable, or mitigated, if undesirable, by grounding. In one embodiment, the layers are grounded together, the isolation layers are removed and the grounding left in place so the devices can be safely transported without fear of electrostatic discharge. This would be helpful if the etch were a wet etch or a dry etch.
The grounding process may be an external grounding, by an apparatus or mechanism external to the structure of the device. Alternatively, the grounding may be as part of the internal structure of the device enabled during manufacture. Initially, external grounding will be discussed.
An apparatus for mitigating the build up of electrostatic charge during etching processes is shown in
The alternative embodiment of
A second isolation layer 25 may be formed on the flex layer 18b, to provide a separation between the conductive layer 18b and a third conductive layer 26. The third conductive layer in this example is the bus layer, used to form a signaling bus above the flex and mirror layers to aid in addressing of the cells of the modulator. Regardless of the application or the MEMS device in which embodiments of the invention may be employed, this is just intended as an example of multiple conductive layers being electrically coupled to mitigate or eliminate the electrostatic charge build up during the etch process.
Also shown in
As mentioned previously, it is probably more desirable to use a means of avoiding or mitigating electrostatic charge build up that does not interfere with current process flows for manufacturing of MEMS devices. An example of a method of manufacturing a MEMS device, in this case the interferometric modulator mentioned previously, is shown in flowchart form in
It must be noted that the process flow given as a particular example in this discussion is for an interferometric modulator. However, embodiments of this invention may be applied to any MEMS device manufacturing flow having isolation layers removed by dry, gas etching. As discussed previously, the interferometric modulator is built upon a transparent substrate such as glass. An electrode layer is deposited, patterned and etched at 32 to form electrodes for addressing the cells of the modulator. The optical layer is then deposited and etched at 34. The first isolation layer is deposited at 36, then the mirror layer at 38. In this example, the first conductive layer will be the mirror layer.
The first conductive layer is then patterned and etched at 40. A second isolation layer is deposited at 42. Again, this is specific to the example of
At 48, the typical process flow is altered to include the grounding of the first and second conductive layers, in this case the electrode layer and the mirror/flex layer. For a device having two conductive layers and one effective isolation layer, the process may end at 50, with the isolation layer being removed with an etch. This is only one embodiment, and the ending of the process is therefore shown in a dashed box. For a device having more than two conductive layers, the process may instead continue at 52.
At 52, a third isolation layer is deposited at 52 in this particular example. As discussed above, this may actually be only a second, effective isolation layer. The bus layer, or third conductive layer, is deposited at 54, patterned and etched at 56. At 58, the conductive layers, in this example there are three, are grounded or electrically coupled together at 58, and the isolation layers are removed at 60. Depending upon the functionality of the device and the electrical drive scheme, the conductive layers may be decoupled at 62. For the example of the interferometric modulator, where the operation of the device relies upon the electrostatic attraction arising between conductive layers being held at different voltage potentials, the coupling would have to be removed.
The wire coupling is an example of an external process of coupling the conductive layers. Other external examples include using test probe structures to provide coupling between the layers, and the use of an ionized gas, where the molecules of the gas itself provides coupling between the layers.
It must be noted that the process of connecting the layers together, or connecting them all to the same potential is referred to as coupling the layers. This is intended to cover the situations in which the layers are just connected together, connected together to a common potential where that potential includes ground, or connected individually to a common or same potential. No restriction on how the layers are electrically coupled together is in intended.
An example of an internal grounding apparatus is shown in
As mentioned above, for devices that cannot operate with the layers coupled together, this internal coupling would have to be removed. As shown in
In this manner, MEMS devices having conductive layers and at least one isolation layer can be etched using current processes while avoiding electrostatic charge build up that may render the devices inoperable. Prior to packaging, and typically upon removal of the device from the etch chamber, the connections are removed or otherwise eliminated from the devices.
Thus, although there has been described to this point a particular embodiment for a method and apparatus for mitigating or eliminating the effects of electrostatic charge during etch processes, it is not intended that such specific references be considered as limitations upon the scope of this invention except in-so-far as set forth in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/839,329, filed May 4, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,476,327, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3728030 | Hawes | Apr 1973 | A |
3955190 | Teraishi | May 1976 | A |
4403248 | te Velde | Sep 1983 | A |
4425572 | Takafuji et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4441791 | Hornbeck | Apr 1984 | A |
4672254 | Dolat et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4681403 | te Velde et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4786128 | Birnbach | Nov 1988 | A |
4859060 | Katagiri et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4880493 | Ashby et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4895500 | Hok et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4896033 | Gautier | Jan 1990 | A |
4954789 | Sampsell | Sep 1990 | A |
4956619 | Hornbeck | Sep 1990 | A |
4982184 | Kirkwood | Jan 1991 | A |
5014259 | Goldberg et al. | May 1991 | A |
5022745 | Zayhowski et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5028939 | Hornbeck et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5091983 | Lukosz | Feb 1992 | A |
5096279 | Hornbeck et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5170283 | O'Brien et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5285196 | Gale | Feb 1994 | A |
5315370 | Bulow | May 1994 | A |
5381232 | Van Wijk | Jan 1995 | A |
5452138 | Mignardi et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5454904 | Ghezzo et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5471341 | Warde et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5485304 | Kaeriyama | Jan 1996 | A |
5526172 | Kanack | Jun 1996 | A |
5526951 | Bailey et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5528707 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5559358 | Burns et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5619061 | Goldsmith et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5636052 | Arney et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5638946 | Zavracky | Jun 1997 | A |
5646729 | Koskinen et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646768 | Kaeiyama | Jul 1997 | A |
5661592 | Bornstein et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665997 | Weaver et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673785 | Schlaak et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5677783 | Bloom et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5710656 | Goosen | Jan 1998 | A |
5734177 | Sakamoto | Mar 1998 | A |
5771321 | Stern | Jun 1998 | A |
5786927 | Greywall et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5795208 | Hattori | Aug 1998 | A |
5808781 | Arney et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818095 | Sampsell | Oct 1998 | A |
5825528 | Goosen | Oct 1998 | A |
5838484 | Goossen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5867302 | Fleming | Feb 1999 | A |
5881449 | Ghosh et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5914804 | Goossen | Jun 1999 | A |
5920418 | Shiono et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5949571 | Goossen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6002661 | Abe et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6028689 | Michalicek et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6040937 | Miles | Mar 2000 | A |
6055090 | Miles | Apr 2000 | A |
6065424 | Shacham-Diamand et al. | May 2000 | A |
6154586 | MacDonald et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6262697 | Stephenson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6323923 | Hoshino et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327071 | Kimura | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6353489 | Popovich et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356378 | Huibers | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6376787 | Martin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384952 | Clark et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6407851 | Islam et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6433917 | Mei et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438282 | Takeda et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452712 | Atobe et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6466354 | Gudeman | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6535663 | Chertkow | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556338 | Han et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6574033 | Chui et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6597490 | Tayebati | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607935 | Kwon | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6608268 | Goldsmith | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6632698 | Ives | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6650455 | Miles | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657832 | Williams et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6661561 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674562 | Miles et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680792 | Miles | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6698295 | Sherrer | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707355 | Yee | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6710908 | Miles et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6787438 | Nelson | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6791735 | Stappaerts | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6794119 | Miles | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6807892 | Biegelsen et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6813059 | Hunter et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6841081 | Chang et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6844959 | Huibers et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6867896 | Miles | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870654 | Lin et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6876047 | Cunningham et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6876482 | DeReus | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882458 | Lin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882461 | Tsai et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6912022 | Lin et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6917268 | Deligianni et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6940630 | Xie | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952303 | Lin et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958847 | Lin | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6980350 | Hung et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6982820 | Tsai | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7034981 | Makigaki | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7053737 | Schwartz et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7119945 | Kothari et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123216 | Miles | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7126738 | Miles | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7198973 | Lin et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7221495 | Miles et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7235914 | Richards et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7236284 | Miles | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7372619 | Miles | May 2008 | B2 |
7460291 | Sampsell et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7476327 | Tung et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
20010001080 | Eldridge et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010003487 | Miles | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010028503 | Flanders et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010043171 | Van Gorkom et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020054424 | Miles | May 2002 | A1 |
20020070931 | Ishikawa | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075555 | Miles | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020111031 | Chase et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126364 | Miles | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020146200 | Kurdle et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149828 | Miles | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158348 | Petrucci et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030016428 | Kato et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030035196 | Walker | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043157 | Miles | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030053078 | Missey et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030202265 | Reboa et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030202266 | Ring et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210851 | Fu et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040008396 | Stappaerts | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008402 | Patel et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008438 | Sato | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027671 | Wu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040027701 | Ishikawa | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040043552 | Strumpell et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040058532 | Miles et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040075967 | Lynch et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040076802 | Tompkin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040080035 | Delapierre | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100594 | Huibers et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100677 | Huibers et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107775 | Kim | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125281 | Lin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040125282 | Lin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040145811 | Lin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147198 | Lin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040175577 | Lin et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184134 | Makigaki | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207897 | Lin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040209195 | Lin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217919 | Pichi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040218251 | Piehl et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240032 | Miles | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002082 | Miles | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050003667 | Lin et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024557 | Lin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035699 | Tsai | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036095 | Yeh et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050046922 | Lin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050046948 | Lin | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078348 | Lin | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050168849 | Lin | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050195462 | Lin | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060220160 | Miles | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060262380 | Miles | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268388 | Miles | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070177247 | Miles | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080037093 | Miles | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080088904 | Miles | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080088910 | Miles | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080088911 | Miles | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080088912 | Miles | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080106782 | Miles | May 2008 | A1 |
20090080060 | Sampsell et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 071 287 | Feb 1983 | EP |
0 668 490 | Aug 1995 | EP |
1 122 577 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1 146 533 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1 172 681 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1 227 346 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1 275 997 | Jan 2003 | EP |
2 843 230 | Feb 2004 | FR |
5-49238 | Feb 1993 | JP |
5-281479 | Oct 1993 | JP |
8-292382 | Nov 1996 | JP |
11211999 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2002-062490 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2001-221913 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002-221678 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2003-340795 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2004-012642 | Jan 2004 | JP |
WO 9503562 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 9852224 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 02063682 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02079853 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 02086582 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 03041133 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03079384 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2005006364 | Jan 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090068781 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10839329 | May 2004 | US |
Child | 12271793 | US |