Method of manufacturing a developer roller

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6341420
  • Patent Number
    6,341,420
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, August 2, 2000
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 29, 2002
    24 years ago
Abstract
A Method of Manufacturing a Developer Roller in which a wetting agent is added to a polymer and graphite to ensure thorough dispersion of the graphite. The developer roller's performance is further improved by spray applying a surface layer of graphite and wetting agent and burnishing this surface layer after spray application. Additional improvements are seen by using many multiple steps of spraying thin coats to improve adhesion between the spray applied coats.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to a developer roller, and a method of making developer rollers used in image forming devices such as laser printers, photocopiers, or facsimile machines. Many of these image-forming devices make use of the same basic technology. These devices make use of a substance known as toner to print images on paper or other media. Toner is a fine dry powdery material. Toner is electrically chargeable, and may be magnetically attractable. The toner is typically contained in a section of a toner cartridge called the toner hopper and is transferred from the toner hopper toward a photoreactive drum or belt that contains a latent image. The latent image is an area of the drum that has a changed electrical charge in the shape of the image to be formed. Toner is electrically attracted to the latent image. The toner in the form of the latent image is then transferred to a sheet of paper or media and then fused on to the paper or to the media.




The toner is transferred from the toner hopper to an area adjacent to the photoreactive drum or belt by a developer roller. Developer rollers maybe used with both magnetic and non-magnetic toners. The most common type of the developer roller is the magnetic development roller and is used in the popular Hewlett Packard Laser Printer series.




A magnetic development roller is used with toner which is both magnetically and electrically attractable. An early embodiment was described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,219,014 issued to Mott et al. These developer rollers are generally rotatable hollow cylinders surrounding a fixed permanent magnet. These rollers are made of a variety of materials but all development rollers have needed to exhibit certain characteristics no matter what their make-up. First, the surface of the development roller must be electrically conductive. Second, the roller must have a texture so as to tribo-charge and carry the toner. The friction of the moving developer roller against a doctor bar or similar device imparts an electrical charge to the toner through tribo-charging. Third, the developer roller must be durable enough to maintain good performance throughout the useful life of the toner cartridge. Fourth, the developer roller must have good release characteristics so that the toner on the developer roller will leave the developer roller and go toward the latent image on the photoconductive drum. Fifth, in response to the electrical attraction, if the developer roller is a magnetic development roller, the developer roller should be magnetically transparent so as not to interfere with the magnetic field generated internally to the developer roller. The key problem in making a developer roller is balancing these qualities of durability and performance. Solutions for these characteristics include using a metallic developer roller such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,749,033 to Swartz et al. Such a developer roller is electrically conductive, durable, has release characteristics, and may be textured by blasting the substrate. Others have used electrically conductive plastic materials as the surface of developer rollers. One such roller is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,659,862 issued to Mahmud and another in U.S. Pat. No. 4,989,044 issued in Nishimura.




These prior art developer rollers have not fully achieved the release characteristics of the toner allowing the toner to move readily from the developer roller to the photoconductive drum or belt. By improving their release characteristics, toner transfer efficiency can be improved resulting in a better print with a lesser consumption of toner. With respect to the plastic coated developer rollers, great care must be taken to ensure uniform electrical conductivity at the surface of the developer roller together with uniform volumetric resistance below the surface. In addition, the prior art plastic coated rollers have used Phenolic resin as the binder material. Phenolic resin is friable and wears readily. The improved method producing the developer roller and the developer roller produced thereby described herein meets and solves these problems and is extremely efficient at transferring toner while maintaining a high degree of durability.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The developer roller of this invention has an electrically conductive substrate surrounded by multiple layers of a polymer containing finely ground graphite and wetting agent. These layers are spray applied in multiple passes. In a preferred embodiment the polymer graphite wetting agent mixture is diluted in a solvent until the solids are approximately 5% by weight of the spray. The wetting agent encourages even dispersion of the polymer graphite wetting agent mixture. By spraying in multiple fine layers good adhesion between layers is promoted. The use of a wetting agent encourages dispersion of the graphite uniformly throughout the material providing for better electrical characteristics, and the use of the wetting agent also promotes adherence between each sprayed layer and between the polymer-graphite-wetting agent layer and the substrate. Use of the wetting agent, therefore, provides for a more durable developer roller. A final top coat of essentially all graphite may be added to the polymer graphite wetting agent mixture. This final coating provides an extremely conductive, extremely lubricous coating and provides the qualities of toner release that are desired. This final coating is dispersed in a solvent, preferably isopropyl alcohol and spray applied. Again, the use of the wetting agent ensures good adherence between the graphite on the surface and the polymer-graphite-wetting agent layer below. The graphite wetting agent layer can then adhere to the graphite in the polymer and to itself creating an essentially all graphite surface that is maintained during the useful life of the developer roller. Multiple layers of the graphite wetting agent layer may be applied. After the essentially graphite and wetting agent layer is spray applied in multiple coats it is burnished with a goat hair brush or similar material to ensure that the graphite and wetting agent are pressed into the pores of the polymer material further promoting adherence. The burnishing may be done once, or multiple times as layers of graphite wetting agent are applied. The method making the developer roller described in this invention is easily automatable, uses readily available materials, and produces a durable developer roller with superior print characteristics.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING





FIG. 1

is a schematic demonstrating the relationship between the developer roller, the toner, and other major components in a prior art toner cartridge.




FIG.


2


(


a


) is a side view of a magnetic developer roller.




FIG.


2


(


b


) is a cross section through the diameter of a magnetic development roller.





FIG. 3

is a cross section of the developer roller of this invention showing the relationship between the developer roller substrate and the other layers making up the developer roller of this invention.





FIG. 4

is a view of a typical developer roller and a doctor blade.





FIG. 5

is a flow chart indicating the method of making a developer roller of this invention.











DESCRIPTION




The developer roller of the present invention and the method of making the same provides improved surface characteristics for efficient and complete transfer of toner from the developer roller to the photoreactive drum, and whose physical and chemical characteristics provide for a better adherence between the substrate and coating layers ensuring a more durable developer roller.





FIG. 1

is a schematic of a prior art toner cartridge for use in an image-forming device. Toner


1


is contained in a container known as the toner hopper


2


. The developer roller


3


rotates and attracts toner particles. A doctor blade


4


removes excess toner from the developer roller


3


as the developer roller


3


rotates. The photoreactive drum


5


is a charged cylinder coated with materials such as selenium, or more usually organic compounds which change charge in areas exposed to light. This photoreactive drum is charged by a device such as a primary charging roller


18


which may impart either a uniformly positive or a uniformly negative charge to the photoreactive drum


5


. As the photoreactive drum


5


rotates past the primary charge roller


18


, it is then illuminated by a laser


6


. Those areas on the photoreactive drum


5


that are illuminated by the laser


6


change their charge becoming either relatively more positive or relatively more negative compared with the unilluminated areas on the surface on the photoreactive drum


5


. In an analog copier reflected light takes the place of the laser


6


. As the photoreactive drum


5


continues to rotate the illuminated areas on the surface of the photoreactive drum


5


move adjacent to the developer roller


3


. Toner


1


on the surface of the developer roller


3


is attracted to the differentially charged areas on the photoreactive drum


5


. The drum continues to rotate. The toner on the drum is brought in proximity to paper or other media


7


. This media


7


has been charged to attract the toner. The toner


1


moves to the media


7


in the image written on the photoreactive drum


5


by the laser


6


. The media then moves through fusing rollers


9


which melt the toner onto the media


7


providing a permanent image. The developer roller


3


rotates adjacent to the toner


1


. The developer roller may magnetically attract toner


1


to its surface if it is a magnetic development roller or it may attract toner electrostatically if it is a non-magnetic toner


1


. As the developer roller rotates, the toner


1


is brought adjacent to a doctor blade


4


which meters the amount of toner


1


on the surface of the developer roller


3


. The friction between the doctor blade


4


and the developer roller


3


helps to tribo-charge the toner


1


to the desired electrical charge. This charged toner


1


can then move to the differentially charged areas of the photoreactive drum


5


.




The friction between the toner i and the mag roller


3


and the developer roller


4


causes wear on the surface of the developer roller


3


.

FIG. 5

illustrates this interaction. The surface of the developer roller


3


is textured to assist in the tribo-charging process and to improve the toner carrying characteristics of the developer roller


3


. If the surface of the developer roller


3


is not durable then friction will wear away the textured profile of the developer roller decreasing toner transfer and tribo-charging of the toner. The outer surface of the developer roller


12


must also be lubricious. If it is not, then particles of toner may adhere to the developer roller and not transfer to the drum. A layer of adhered, non-transferring toner will further decrease the quality of the print.




The present invention provides this required level of durability and lubriciousness by having an outer layer of essentially all graphite


17


together with the wetting agent over a durable layer of polymer graphite and wetting agent that have been applied in multiple fine layers. Turning to

FIG. 3

, a cross section of the developer roller of this invention can be seen. The outer surface


12


of the developer roller is the outer surface of the essentially all graphite layer


17


. Below this is a layer of polymer, graphite, and wetting agent


16


over the developer roller substrate


18


. The developer roller substrate


18


is preferably aluminum, but which could also be of an electrically conductive polymer, or other metal. The advantage of this construction and the method of making the same are explained below.




The method of making a developer roller is illustrated in

FIG. 5 and a

s follows: First, a graphite mixture


19


must be prepared. The graphite particles must be reduced to a relatively uniform and small size preferably in the range of 0.3 to 10 microns. Graphite is milled with a suitable solvent in a vibratory, ball or attrition mill. Although a variety of solvents may be used, the preferred embodiment is a mixture of PMA (propylene glycol methyl ether acetate) and acetone. The solvent should be selected to have a sufficiently low boiling point to dry readily and therefore prevent drips or runs, but a sufficiently high boiling point to insure an even coating when spray applied. After milling the graphite to a suitable size, a wetting agent is added


20


. A wetting agent is a product designed to ensure the singulation of particles and thorough mixing of the particles in the solution. Wetting agents include a variety of substances that are well known for their dispersing qualities in the paint industry. What is not well known is that these wetting agents also promote adhesion. The inventors have discovered the use of a wetting agent promotes adhesion of the polymer-graphite-wetting agent layer


16


to the developer roller substrate


18


, and promotes adhesion of the polymer-graphite wetting agent to one another. In the preferred embodiment the wetting agent Antiterra U manufactured by BIC Chemie is used. Other wetting agents may be used. The proportions of graphite to a wetting agent are preferably approximately 50 to 1, but other proportions will provide satisfactory results.




In the next step a suitable polymer is added to the graphite and wetting agent mixture


21


and mixed in one of a number of suitable mills to ensure thorough dispersion of all the constituents. Although a variety of polymers may be used, in the preferred embodiment an elastomeric elastic polymer, preferably a two-part blocked heat activated polyurethane is used. An elastomeric polymer provides additional toughness and resiliency to the developer roller. This polymer-graphite wetting-agent combination has, in the preferred embodiment, 60 parts polymer to 40 parts graphite and wetting agent. This mixture is further diluted in solvents to a solid content of about 5%. The wetting agent in the polymer-graphite-wetting-agent mixture further ensures good dispersion of the materials throughout the solution.




After preparing a suitable polymer-graphite-wetting agent solution, the next step is to provide an electrically conductive textured substrate


18


. Although an electrically conductive molded plastic may be used, in the preferred embodiment a piece of textured aluminum is used. The electrically conductive substrate


18


is in the form of a cylinder or tube. If aluminum the tube may be formed by extrusion, or by boring. After the tube is formed in the appropriate diameter and length, the tube is next textured. Texturing can occur in a variety of methods including media blasting, or vibratory finishing. In the preferred embodiment, media blasting using glass media is used. After texturing, the developer roller substrate


18


is now ready for coating. The purpose of the polymer-graphite-wetting-agent layer


16


is to provide a wear resistant substrate which can assist in maintaining a graphite rich surface. It provides better qualities to the developer roller substrate than could exist without such a coating. For example, if the developer roller substrate


18


is aluminum and is not coated, it will oxidize changing its performance characteristics. Also, aluminum is relatively soft, and would readily wear from abrasion by the toner


1


and the doctor blade


4


.




The polymer-graphite wetting-agent layer


16


is applied by spraying


22


the material onto the electrically conductive substrate


18


. The polymer-graphite wetting-agent layer is preferably applied by spraying


22


multiple fine coats with an air brush or similar sprayer on the developer roller substrate


18


. By using multiple small sprays of highly diluted polymer-graphite wetting-agent, an even coating of material is ensured and a better adherence between the coatings is ensured. Here again, the wetting agent serves a crucial function. Wetting agents improve the bonding between layers of material, and between dissimilar materials. The inventors have experimented with applying this same material in a single spray and without a wetting agent and have found that multiple sprays, using a wetting agent, preferably twenty or more, greatly improve the bond between the polymer graphite wetting agent layer and the developer roller substrate


18


.




Spray application of the polymer-graphite wetting-agent layer occurs in multiple passes. After each pass the developer roller substrate, and the partially applied polymer graphite wetting agent layer


16


are oven dried to drive off or evaporate


23


the solvent. After drying the developer roller substrate


18


and partial coating of the polymer-graphic-wetting agent are cooled and another pass of polymer-graphite-wetting agent material may be spray applied


22


. This step may be repeated


24


as often as desired, preferably 20-30 times in layers that are between about 0.03 microns to 1.25 microns thick. The thickness of the polymer-graphite wetting agent layer


16


may vary, but in the preferred embodiment is about 1 to 25 microns. After all the desired material has been applied to the developer roller substrate


18


, the blocked polyurethane is then cured or cross linked


25


by heating the developer roller substrate


18


and polymer graphite wetting agent layer


16


. This further improves adherence between the sprayed layers and the polymer graphite wetting agent layer


16


and the developer roller substrate


18


.




The graphite-wetting agent layer


17


is prepared in a similar fashion to the preparation of the graphite and wetting agent before adding the polymer. Graphite is reduced to a fine size in a suitable mill, preferably a vibratory mill together with a solvent. In this case the solvent is preferably isopropyl alcohol. A higher boiling point solvent may be used for this layer since even dispersion will be aided by burnishing. A wetting agent is then added to the graphite solvent mixture. In the alternative, the wetting agent may be added to the graphite in the milling process. In the preferred embodiment, the ratio between the graphite and the wetting agent is 50 to 1 although other proportions will produce satisfactory results. BIC Chemie's AntiTerra U is again the preferred wetting agent although others may be used.




The graphite wetting agent mixture is then further diluted until the solid content is approximately 3% of the solution. The graphite-wetting agent layer


17


is then spray applied


26


using an airbrush or similar fine spray applicator to the surface of the polymer-graphite wetting agent layer


16


. The wetting agent in the graphite wetting agent layer ensures good adherence between the exposed graphite particles and the polymer graphite wetting agent layer and the graphite in the graphite wetting agent layer. Spray application


26


of the graphite wetting agent layer


17


may be repeated 28 in multiple passes, preferably 3 or more, possibly as many as 20 passes. After spray applying each layer of graphite wetting agent, that layer is allowed to evaporate


27


, driving off the solvent. The essentially all graphite layer


17


is burnished


29


in order to spread the graphite evenly over the surface of the developer roller and to drive the graphite wetting agent material into the pores and gaps of the polymer graphite wetting agent layer. Burnishing


29


ensures a strong bond between the graphite wetting agent on the surface layer and the graphite in the polymer below. This bond provides an essentially all graphite layer


17


at the outer surface


12


of the developer roller


3


. Burnishing


29


may be repeated


28


after each pass or may be repeated


28


after a number of layers of the graphite wetting agent layer have been applied.




By providing a surface layer of essentially all graphite, the present developer roller has excellent electrical and lubricious characteristics providing for full release of the toner. The essentially all graphite layer is able to maintain itself through the useful life of the developer roller because the wetting agent ensures that the graphite adheres strongly to the surface of the polymer graphite wetting agent layer. By use of a resilient elastomeric polymer such as polyurethane, wear of the polymer graphite wetting agent layer is reduced or eliminated.




The developer of the roller of this invention offers further advantages. The developer roller may be reused after the initial cycle, by cleaning the developer roller and repeating the application of a layer of essentially all graphite and wetting agent. Thus, the developer roller may be reused providing significant advantages to the environment and reduction of steps necessary to make a developer roller and of cost to the end-user. This developer roller is particularly useful for persons or companies who remanufacture toner cartridges. A remanufactured toner cartridge is one that has been used once, and has been restored by adding additional toner, and replacing the worn out components. The developer roller of this invention lends itself readily to being restored by renewing the surface layer of graphite. Although the inventors have made reference to particular materials, other alternate materials and inventions well known to those skilled in the art are within the spirit and scope of this invention.



Claims
  • 1. A method of manufacturing a developer roller for use in an image forming device, said method comprising the steps of:a) Providing an electrically conductive substrate, b) Mixing a polymer with finely ground graphite and a wetting agent with a sprayable solvent forming a mixture of polymer, graphite, and wetting agent and solvent, c) Spray applying said mixture of polymer, graphite, wetting agent and solvent on the electrically conductive substrate to form a polymer-graphite-wetting agent layer.
  • 2. A method as in claim 1 further comprising applying more than one polymer-graphite-wetting agent layer.
  • 3. A method as in claim 2 wherein the polymer-graphite-wetting agent layers are applied in more than twenty coats.
  • 4. A method as in claim 3 further comprising the step of oven drying the developer roller after spraying a layer of polymer-graphite-wetting agent.
  • 5. A method as in claim 4 further comprising the step of air cooling the developer roller after each step of drying the developer roller and before applying the next coat.
  • 6. A method as in claim 5 wherein the polymer is a two-part heat activated blocked polyurethane.
  • 7. A method as in claim 6 further comprising the step of heating the coated roller to cross-link the polyurethane.
  • 8. A method as in claim 1 wherein the polymer graphite wetting agent layer is about 60% polymer, about 40% graphite and less than about 1% wetting agent by weight.
  • 9. A method as in claim 8 wherein the graphite and wetting agent are thoroughly mixed by placing them in a vibratory mill for more than three days before adding the polymer.
  • 10. A method as in claim 1 further comprising the step of thoroughly mixing the graphite and wetting agent in the solvent before adding the polymer.
  • 11. A method as in claim 1 further comprising diluting the polymer-graphite-wetting agent and solvent mixture in additional solvent until the polymer-graphite-wetting agent in the mixture is less than 5% of the mixture by weight.
  • 12. A method as in claim 1 wherein the solvent is a mixture of PMA and acetone.
  • 13. A method as in claim 1 further comprising the step of thoroughly mixing the graphite and wetting agent in a second solvent, and spray applying a graphite rich layer of graphite and wetting agent in a layer on top of the polymer-graphite-wetting agent layer.
  • 14. A method as in claim 13, wherein the graphite rich layer is applied in multiple coats.
  • 15. A method as in claim 14 further comprising the step of drying the second solvent from the graphite rich layer.
  • 16. A method as in claim 15 further comprising the step of burnishing the graphite rich layer to ensure an even surface coat of essentially all graphite, and to aid adherence of the graphite to the polymer-graphite-wetting agent layer.
  • 17. A method as in claim 13 wherein the second solvent is isopropyl alcohol.
  • 18. A method as in claim 13 wherein the graphite rich layer has a conductivity greater than the conductivity of the polymer graphite wetting agent layer.
  • 19. A method as in claim 13 wherein the graphite rich layer has a conductivity greater than the conductivity of the polymer-graphite-wetting agent layer.
  • 20. A method as in claim 1 wherein the graphite particles average about six microns in size.
  • 21. A method as in claim 1 wherein the electrically conductive substrate is an Aluminum tube.
  • 22. A method as in claim 1 wherein the electrically conductive substrate is an Aluminum tube.
  • 23. A method of manufacturing a developer roller for use in an image forming device, said method comprising the steps of:a) Providing an electrically conductive substrate, b) Mixing a polymer with finely ground graphite and a wetting agent with a sprayable solvent forming a mixture of polymer, graphite, wetting agent and solvent, c) spray applying a thin layer of said mixture of polymer, graphite, wetting agent and solvent on the electrically conductive substrate to form a thin layer of polymer-graphite-wetting agent on the electrically conductive substrate.
  • 24. A method as in claim 23 wherein the thin layer of polymer-graphite-wetting agent has a thickness of between about 1.25 microns and about 0.03 microns.
  • 25. A method as in claim 24 further comprising the step of air cooling the developer roller after each step of drying the developer roller and before applying the next layer of polymer-graphite-wetting agent.
  • 26. A method as in claim 23 further comprising applying more than one the polymer-graphite-wetting agent layer.
  • 27. A method as in claim 23 further comprising the step of applying about 20 to 30 polymer-graphite-wetting agent layers.
  • 28. A method as in claim 23 further comprising the step of oven drying the developer roller after spraying the layer of polymer-graphite-wetting agent.
  • 29. A method as in claim 23 wherein the polymer-graphite-wetting agent layer is about 60% polymer, about 40% graphite and less than about 1% wetting agent by weight.
  • 30. A method as in claim 23 further comprising the step of thoroughly mixing the graphite and wetting agent in the solvent before adding the polymer.
  • 31. A method as in claim 23 further comprising diluting the polymer-graphite-wetting agent and solvent mixture in additional solvent until the polymer-graphite-wetting agent in the mixture is less than 5% of the mixture by weight.
  • 32. A method as in claim 31 further comprising the step of heating the coated roller to cross-link the polyurethane.
  • 33. A method as in claim 32 further comprising the step of drying the second solvent from the graphite rich layer.
  • 34. A method as in claim 23 wherein the solvent is a mixture of PMA and acetone.
  • 35. A method as in claim 23 wherein the polymer is a two-part heat activated blocked polyurethane.
  • 36. A method as in claim 35, wherein the graphite rich layer is applied in multiple coats.
  • 37. A method as in claim 35 further comprising the step of burnishing the graphite rich layer to ensure an even surface coat of essentially all graphite, and to aid adherence of the graphite to the polymer-graphite-wetting agent layer.
  • 38. A method as in claim 35 wherein the second solvent is isopropyl alcohol.
  • 39. A method as in claim 23 further comprising the steps of mixing graphite and wetting agent in a second solvent, and spray applying a graphite rich layer of graphite and wetting agent in a layer on top of the polymer-graphite-wetting agent layer.
US Referenced Citations (60)
Number Name Date Kind
48453 Sentell Jun 1865 A
3040704 Bliss Jun 1962 A
3219014 Mott et al. Nov 1965 A
3770482 Millar et al. Nov 1973 A
3863603 Buckley et al. Feb 1975 A
4018601 Hagenbach Apr 1977 A
4034709 Fraser et al. Jul 1977 A
4271784 Ishimoto et al. Jun 1981 A
4299900 Mitsubshi et al. Nov 1981 A
4331101 Muller et al. May 1982 A
4368971 Watanabe Jan 1983 A
4517274 Honda et al. May 1985 A
4564285 Yasuda Jan 1986 A
4700450 Michel Oct 1987 A
4745429 Mukai May 1988 A
4748472 Mukai May 1988 A
4806992 Yasuda et al. Feb 1989 A
4866480 Hosoya et al. Sep 1989 A
4870461 Watanabe et al. Sep 1989 A
4876574 Tajima et al. Oct 1989 A
4943504 Tomura Jul 1990 A
4954404 Inoue Sep 1990 A
4957840 Sakashita et al. Sep 1990 A
4982689 Honda et al. Jan 1991 A
4985327 Sakashita et al. Jan 1991 A
4987454 Natsuhara Jan 1991 A
4989044 Nishimura et al. Jan 1991 A
5027745 Yamazaki et al. Jul 1991 A
5052335 Enoguchi et al. Oct 1991 A
5149914 Koga et al. Sep 1992 A
5155532 Sakurada Oct 1992 A
5162608 Matsuda et al. Nov 1992 A
5175586 Goseki et al. Dec 1992 A
5177322 Nishimura et al. Jan 1993 A
5185496 Nishimura et al. Feb 1993 A
5202729 Miyamoto et al. Apr 1993 A
5213715 Patterson et al. May 1993 A
5215845 Yusa et al. Jun 1993 A
5223669 Kanba et al. Jun 1993 A
5227849 Katsumi et al. Jul 1993 A
5255059 Kai et al. Oct 1993 A
5274426 Goseki et al. Dec 1993 A
5286917 Unno et al. Feb 1994 A
5302419 Muzzy Apr 1994 A
5309206 Deishi May 1994 A
5325637 Yasuda et al. Jul 1994 A
5400630 Okumura et al. Mar 1995 A
5411779 Nakajima et al. May 1995 A
5483326 Kosmider Jan 1996 A
5547724 Kuribayashi Aug 1996 A
5563690 Hasegawa et al. Oct 1996 A
5608502 Yamashita et al. Mar 1997 A
5618647 Kukimoto et al. Apr 1997 A
5655196 Litman et al. Aug 1997 A
5659862 Mahmud et al. Aug 1997 A
5681623 Ferralli Oct 1997 A
5765286 Sato et al. Jun 1998 A
5942287 Christiansen et al. Aug 1999 A
5997772 Cornelius et al. Dec 1999 A
6063511 Purinton et al. May 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (15)
Number Date Country
0632242 Jun 1994 EP
2088252 Jun 1982 GB
50543679 Mar 1980 JP
5647926 Apr 1981 JP
5741676 Mar 1982 JP
63241187 Oct 1988 JP
63253954 Oct 1988 JP
02116857 May 1990 JP
2290978 Nov 1990 JP
04141685 Jan 1992 JP
4141685 May 1992 JP
5142949 Jun 1993 JP
5266457 Oct 1993 JP
06230676 Aug 1994 JP
6238945 Aug 1994 JP