Conical horn antennas are commonly used in applications and systems where total antenna volume and antenna efficiency are important. For relatively small apertures, compared to wavelength, the horn antenna provides better efficiency than a reflector since there is no aperture blockage due to the feed. Further improved volume efficiency of the horn antenna can be achieved by having a wider flare angle of the horn; however the phase front of the radiated wave becomes curved and the efficiency drops as the flare angle gets wider. A dielectric lens may be used with a horn antenna to flatten the phase front of the radiated wave, increasing the efficiency while still maintaining a small volume. A drawback to a lensed horn is that the lens can be quite heavy. In addition, the lens moves the center of gravity far forward of the center of volume, forcing the mechanical support structure for the antenna system to be complicated and heavy.
Aspects and embodiments are directed to antenna lens structures, and antenna systems including the lens structures.
According to one embodiment an antenna lens apparatus includes a shell made of a first material having a first dielectric constant, the shell defining an interior cavity, and a second material disposed within and at least partially filling the cavity, the second material having a second dielectric constant higher than the first dielectric constant.
In certain examples the first material is polycarbonate, a thermoset, rigid translucent plastic produced by cross linking polystyrene with divinylbenzene, or polytetrafluoroethylene. In one example the second material is a powder. In one example the second material is a ceramic powder. The second material may be aluminum oxide or magnesium oxide, for example.
According to another embodiment, an antenna system comprises a horn antenna, and an antenna lens coupled to the horn antenna, the antenna lens including a shell made of a first material having a first dielectric constant, the shell defining an interior cavity, and a second material disposed within the cavity of the shell and having a second dielectric constant higher than the first dielectric constant.
The horn antenna may be a rectangular horn or a conical horn. The first material may be polycarbonate, a thermoset, rigid translucent plastic produced by cross linking polystyrene with divinylbenzene, or polytetrafluoroethylene, for example. In one example the second material is a powder. In one example the second material is a ceramic powder. The second material may be aluminum oxide or magnesium oxide, for example.
According to another embodiment a method of manufacture of an antenna lens comprises forming a shell of a first material, the shell defining an interior cavity and having an external shape corresponding to a shape of the antenna lens, at least partially filling the cavity of the shell with a powder, the powder being a second material different from the first material and having a second dielectric constant higher than a first dielectric constant of the first material, settling the powder inside the cavity, and sealing the shell to form the antenna lens with the powder inside the shell.
In one example forming the shell includes forming a hole in the shell, and filling the cavity of the shell with the powder includes pouring the powder into the cavity through the hole. The shell may be formed by extrusion, injection molding or 3D printing, for example. In one example settling the powder includes shaking the antenna lens on a shake table. In other examples settling the powder includes heating the powder, mechanically pressing the powder, or curing the powder.
Still other aspects, embodiments, and advantages of these exemplary aspects and embodiments are discussed in detail below. Embodiments disclosed herein may be combined with other embodiments in any manner consistent with at least one of the principles disclosed herein, and references to “an embodiment,” “some embodiments,” “an alternate embodiment.” “various embodiments.” “one embodiment” or the like are not necessarily mutually exclusive and are intended to indicate that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described may be included in at least one embodiment. The appearances of such terms herein are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
Various aspects of at least one embodiment are discussed below with reference to the accompanying figures, which are not intended to be drawn to scale. The figures are included to provide illustration and a further understanding of the various aspects and embodiments, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, but are not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention. In the figures, each identical or nearly identical component that is illustrated in various figures is represented by a like numeral. For purposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in every figure. In the figures:
As discussed above, antenna systems can incorporate dielectric lenses. A dielectric lens for a horn antenna can typically be a single solid block of dielectric material that has a fairly low dielectric constant and very low loss. Examples of such dielectric materials include cross-linked polystyrene (such as the material available under the trademark “Rexolite,” which is a thermoset, rigid translucent plastic produced by cross linking polystyrene with divinylbenzene) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), which is a synthetic fluoropolymer of tetrafluoroethylene.
When electromagnetic energy is incident from air onto a dielectric material, part of the energy is reflected, as given by the reflection coefficient (G):
G=(1−n)/(1+n)
where n is the index of refraction of the dielectric material and e=n{circumflex over ( )}2 is the dielectric constant of the dielectric material. Materials having low values of dielectric constant (air=1) will have small values of reflection, as shown by the above relationships. In many applications, lenses made from cross-linked polystyrene or PTFE do not require matching layers. However as materials with higher dielectric constants are used for the lenses, the reflection becomes significant, and it can be necessary or at least desirable to use matching layers to reduce the loss. Ideally the matching layer may have an optimum dielectric constant (e1) given by:
e1=sqrt(e0*e2)
where e0 and e2 are the dielectric constants of the materials positioned on either side of the thin matching layer. If the dielectric lens is primarily made of a core material and air is on the other side of the matching layer (i.e., the matching layer is positioned between the core lens material and the air) then the ideal dielectric constant (e1) of the matching layer is the square root of the dielectric constant of the core material (since the dielectric constant of air is 1).
As the dielectric constant of the lens material increases, the thickness of the lens decreases, as does the volume of the lens. Lower volume is desirable for wide flare angle horns since the weight is generally less (depending on the materials used) and the center of gravity is moved closer to the center of volume, relieving some of the burden on the mechanical support structure. Materials such as Alumina and magnesium oxide, for example, offer higher dielectric constants (˜10) as compared to the dielectric constants of a commonly-used cross-linked polystyrene (˜2.5) or PTFE (˜2.2), and exhibit extremely low loss. However, Alumina and magnesium oxide are both ceramic materials and are difficult to form or machine into complex shapes, such as lenses, due to the hardness of the materials. These ceramic materials are readily available as a high purity powder in variable particle sizes and may be used to modify the dielectric constants of resins and plastics.
Certain high dielectric lenses have been made with resin molded/machined cores and molded/machined matching layers; however these structures involve the use of multiple machining and molding steps, which is very costly. In addition, the resins used are usually significantly more lossy than, for example, pure Alumina.
In view of these disadvantages, aspects and embodiments may provide dielectric lens, and antenna systems including these lenses, that allow for the use of high dielectric constant materials to achieve a compact, low profile solution while avoiding complex and costly manufacturing processes. In particular, according to certain aspects and embodiments, an antenna lens has a structure that includes a thin outer shell made of a first matching layer material, the shell forming a cavity that can be filled with a second dielectric powder material. As discussed in more detail below, the dielectric powder material can have a relatively high dielectric constant, thereby allowing the volume of the lens to be relatively small, while the shell can both provide a matching layer function and provide the desired shape or structure for the lens. Accordingly, aspects and embodiments enable the construction of antenna lenses made of materials with desired dielectric constants, but which may be difficult or expensive to mold or machine and therefore conventionally have either been avoided or added significant cost and/or complexity to the antenna system.
An example of an antenna system including a dielectric lens in accord with certain embodiments is shown in
As discussed above, the lens 200 includes an outer shell 230 made of a first dielectric material. The shell 230 defines a cavity 240 that is at least partially filled by a second (also referred to as “core”) dielectric material. The outer shell 230 can act as a matching layer for the core dielectric material. As shown in
In certain embodiments, the core dielectric material is a material having a relatively high dielectric constant (e.g., ˜10), such as Alumina or magnesium oxide, for example. As discussed above, these materials can be difficult to mold or machine into complex shapes, such as may be required to form an antenna lens. According to certain embodiments of the dielectric lens 200, the outer shell 230, which can be made from a material that is easy to mold or machine, defines the shape of the lens, and the core dielectric material can be provided in a powder form that at least partially fills the cavity 240 defined by the outer shell 230. Thus, the need to process the core dielectric material into a particular shape can be avoided.
As shown in
At act 320, a hole 260 is made in the shell 230 of the lens 200 to allow the cavity 240 inside the shell to be accessed and filled with the core dielectric material 270. In some embodiments, the hole 260 can be formed in the shell 230 by drilling or otherwise creating the hole in the shell that is formed in act 310. In other embodiments, however, acts 310 and 320 may be combined, such that the shell 230 is formed (e.g., by machining, milling, 3D printing, or injection molding, for example) with the hole 260 in its surface. In
As indicated in
Still referring to
At act 350, the hole 260 in the shell 230 is sealed after the cavity 240 has been filled with a desired amount of dielectric powder 270 and the powder has settled. Sealing the hole 260 prevents the powder 270 from coming out of the cavity 240. In certain examples act 350 can include permanently sealing the hole 260. For example, the hole 260 may be sealed by machining or extruding an amount of the shell material to cover and seal the hole. In other examples, a stopper can be inserted into the hole 260 to seal the hole. The stopper may be removeable such that the cavity 240 can be reopened, or the stopper can be permanently fixed within the hole 260, for example, using a scaling adhesive.
Thus, aspects and embodiments may provide an antenna lens that can advantageously have relatively low volume and weight by allowing the use of high dielectric constant materials with manufacturing methods that may be relatively simple and low-cost. Embodiments of the antenna lens can be used with a horn antenna to provide an antenna system, as discussed above. In certain examples, the antenna system can include a single horn antenna and corresponding lens. In other examples, the antenna system can include multiple horn antennas connected together to form an array, each horn antenna having an associated dielectric lens according to aspects disclosed herein.
For example,
Having described above several aspects of at least one embodiment, it is to be appreciated various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure and are intended to be within the scope of the invention. Embodiments of the optical system are not limited in application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the above description or illustrated in the accompanying drawings, and are capable of implementation in various ways. Examples of specific implementations are provided herein for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be limiting. Also, the phraseology and terminology used herein are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use herein of “including,” “comprising,” “having,” “containing,” “involving,” and variations thereof is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. References to “or” may be construed as inclusive so that any terms described using “or” may indicate any of a single, more than one, and all of the described terms. Accordingly, the foregoing description and drawings are by way of example only, and the scope of the invention should be determined from proper construction of the appended claims, and their equivalents.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 as a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/113,346, titled “DIELECTRIC LENS FOR ANTENNA SYSTEM,” filed Aug. 27, 2018, U.S. Pat. No. 10,992,052, which claims the benefits under 35 U.S.C. § 119 (e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/550,814 titled “DIELECTRIC LENS FOR ANTENNA SYSTEM,” filed on Aug. 28, 2017. Each of these applications is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
390350 | Denton | Feb 1888 | A |
2692336 | Kock | Oct 1954 | A |
2718592 | Smith | Sep 1955 | A |
2764757 | Rust et al. | Sep 1956 | A |
2884629 | Mason | Apr 1959 | A |
2908002 | Van | Oct 1959 | A |
3102263 | Meyer | Aug 1963 | A |
3329958 | Anderson | Jul 1967 | A |
3566309 | Ajioka | Feb 1971 | A |
3623111 | Provencher et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3877031 | Mailloux et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
4210915 | Kienberger et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4228410 | Goudey et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4366453 | Schwarz | Dec 1982 | A |
4498061 | Morz et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4640280 | Sterzer | Feb 1987 | A |
4654622 | Foss et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4659658 | McCarthy et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4673943 | Hannan | Jun 1987 | A |
4783663 | Rammos et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4827269 | Shestag et al. | May 1989 | A |
4951061 | Lee | Aug 1990 | A |
4959658 | Collins | Sep 1990 | A |
5086304 | Collins | Feb 1992 | A |
5117240 | Anderson et al. | May 1992 | A |
5154973 | Imagawa et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5166698 | Ashbaugh et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5305001 | Wong et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5359338 | Hatcher, Jr. et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5905457 | Rashid | May 1999 | A |
5973647 | Barrett et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5977930 | Fischer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6023246 | Tanabe | Feb 2000 | A |
6036893 | Lier et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6201508 | Metzen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208307 | Frisco et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6307523 | Green et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6366244 | Fernandes | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388621 | Lynch | May 2002 | B1 |
6489928 | Sakurada | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6509880 | Sabet et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6563398 | Wu | May 2003 | B1 |
6807396 | Horie et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6950073 | Clymer et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6990639 | Wilson | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6992639 | Lier | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7034771 | Rao et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7403166 | Clymer et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7423604 | Nagai | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7439925 | Huang et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7564421 | Edwards et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7565421 | Naruse | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7791549 | Clymer et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8427384 | Clymer et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8760354 | Clymer et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9293835 | Clymer et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9774097 | Clymer et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
10131445 | Ferguson et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10992052 | Kratzenberg | Apr 2021 | B2 |
20020067317 | Sakurada | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040066345 | Schadler | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20060071876 | Clymer et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070001918 | Ebling et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070273599 | Haziza | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20100188304 | Clymer et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20150123863 | Legay et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150266244 | Page | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160006129 | Haziza | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20180164430 | Kuriyama et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20190310345 | Nagaishi et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
664848 | Mar 1988 | CH |
664848 | Mar 1988 | CN |
1031451 | Mar 1989 | CN |
1680402 | Oct 2005 | CN |
0390350 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0390350 | Feb 1995 | EP |
2108770 | May 1983 | GB |
2208969 | Apr 1989 | GB |
2232010 | Nov 1990 | GB |
55-093106 | Jun 1980 | JP |
59-022403 | Feb 1984 | JP |
62-58706 | Mar 1987 | JP |
04-150501 | May 1992 | JP |
06061900 | Mar 1994 | JP |
2004-179738 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2005-536929 | Dec 2005 | JP |
04150501 | Sep 2008 | JP |
97008775 | Mar 1997 | WO |
2004019443 | Mar 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Storkus, Walter L., “Design Techniques for Compact Monopulse Antenna Feeds for W-Band Radar Systems,” IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium-Digest (1990) pp. 805-808. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210249781 A1 | Aug 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62550814 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16113346 | Aug 2018 | US |
Child | 17241404 | US |