The present application is a US national stage application filed, under 35 U.S.C. §371, on the basis of International Application PCT/EP2008/0002944, filed Apr. 14, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a method for manufacturing a gas electron multiplier (GEM). The structure and the operation of a GEM are described in EP 0 948 803 B1, in which also a number of further references are given.
Briefly, the function of GEM 10 of
While
EP 0 948 803 B1 also discloses a method for manufacturing the GEM 10. According to said prior art method, two identical films or masks are imprinted with a desired pattern of holes and overlaid on each side of the metal cladded blank GEM which is previously coated with a light-sensitive resin. After exposure with ultraviolet light and development of the resin, the resin exposes only the portions of the metal layers 14, 16 corresponding to the holes to be formed. Then, the metal layers are etched simultaneously from both sides, such that holes are grown from both sides which meet in the middle to form the throughholes 18.
The prior art manufacturing method relies on the co-registering of the films or masks used for exposing the light-sensitive resin. A good coincidence of the patterns on both sides of the blank GEM can in fact be obtained if the active area 20, i.e. the area where the holes 18 are to be formed, is not too large, say 10×10 cm. However, recently there has been a demand for larger sized GEMs. When trying to manufacture bigger GEMs, the inventor found that difficulties arise with the prior art manufacturing method. In particular, for larger GEMs it turns out to be very difficult to ensure a proper co-registering of the patterns on both sides of the blank. As mentioned above, conventionally, a photomask had been directly placed on top of each of the first and second metal layers 14, 16 which were covered with a photoresist. While it is possible to print these masks with sufficient precision, it turned out that the film on which the masks were printed were not stable enough to guarantee a precise alignment of the pattern on both sides of the blank if the films are becoming larger such as to form a larger GEM. In particular, the films tend to slightly deform due to temperature and/or humidity, and given the very small size of the holes to be formed, this distortion is already enough to severely disturb the co-registering of the two patterns, which then leads to holes in which the center axes of the two halves formed from opposite sides are shifted by an unacceptable amount of 15 μm or more.
The inventor have also made attempts to circumvent these problems by using a mask material that is more stable. For example, attempts have been made to make such masks from glass. However, the results were not satisfactory. In particular, for the desired large mask sizes, the lack of planarity of the glass turned out to be a problem.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for manufacturing a GEM 10 that allows to manufacture high quality GEMs even at large sizes.
This problem is solved by a method according to claim 1. An alternative solution to this problem is provided by the method of claim 5. Preferred embodiments are defined in the dependent claims.
According to the first aspect of the invention, the method comprises the following steps: preparing a blank sheet comprised of an insulating sheet provided with first and second metal layers on its first and second surfaces, respectively, said first and second metal layers having an initial thickness,
a first metal layer hole forming step in which the first metal layer is patterned by means of photolithography, such as to form holes through said first metal layer,
an insulating sheet hole forming step in which the holes formed in the first metal layer are extended through the insulating layer by etching from the first surface side only, and
a second metal layer hole forming step in which the holes formed in the first metal layer and the insulating sheet are extended through the second metal layer, said second metal layer hole forming step comprising an electrochemical etching process in which a voltage is applied between the second metal layer and an electrode immersed in the etchant, said voltage being chosen such that the second metal layer is etched.
In contrast to the method described in EP 0 948 803 B1, in the method of the invention only one of the metal layers, called the first metal layer in the following, is patterned. In other words, there is no need to co-register patterns on both sides of the blank. From this pattern in the first metal layer, the hole is grown through the insulating sheet and through the second metal layer in the consecutive steps.
The difficult part of this method is the second metal layer hole forming step. In this step, the holes have to be etched through the second metal layer, which means that a part of the etching has to be done through the holes already formed through the first metal layer and the insulating sheet. However, in this second metal layer etching step, there is the problem that in principle, when the second metal layer is etched, the first metal layer will also be exposed to the etchant and be etched as well. In practice, it turns out that the first metal layer is easily damaged by this etching step (in particular, it may happen that the metal is completely removed from the first surface of the insulating sheet at some places). This will particularly happen with large blanks, since it is very difficult to provide an absolutely uniform metal layer on a large surface of say 0.5 m2 or even 1 m2. Even if the insulating sheet should not be completely removed in the areas between the holes, there is still a problem that if the first metal layer is etched during the second metal layer hole forming step, the first metal layer will be etched in a region surrounding the holes, such that a small ring of insulating sheet material will be exposed on the first metal layer side. It has been found that these rings of exposed insulating sheet material will have an adverse effect on the function of the GEM, which apparently is due to ions being caught on that exposed surface.
According to the first aspect of the invention, however, the undesired etching of the first metal layer during the second metal layer hole forming step can be avoided by using an electrochemical etching step. In electrochemical etching, the etchant is not capable of etching the material through a chemical reaction, unless a suitable electric voltage is applied. By applying an electric voltage to the etchant between the material to be etched and an additional electrode immersed in the etchant, an electrolytic process is started, in which an electric current flows in the etchant and ions in the etchant react in an etching manner with the material. According to this aspect of the invention, the respective voltage is applied between the second metal layer and the immersed electrode only, such that only the second metal layer is etched, while the first metal layer remains practically unaffected. This allows to perform the second metal layer hole forming step selectively for the second metal layer without damaging the first metal layer.
In a preferred embodiment, the potential is chosen such that the second metal layer forms an anode and the electrode immersed in the etchant forms a cathode. The electrode is preferably spaced from the second metal layer by 3 to 8 cm.
In a preferred embodiment, the etchant used in the second metal layer hole forming step comprises sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid and copper sulfate.
Preferably, during at least a portion of the second metal layer hole forming step, the electrode is provided on the first metal layer side of the blank sheet, such as to etch the second metal layer “from inside”, i.e. through the holes formed at the first metal layer and the insulating sheet. Moreover, the electrode may also be provided on the second metal layer side of the blank sheet during a further portion of the second metal layer hole forming step, such as to etch the second metal layer from the outside, that is from the side to which the second metal layer is closer. The step of electrochemical etching with the electrode provided on the second metal layer side of the blank sheet is maintained at least until the holes, which have previously been formed in the second metal sheet by etching from the inside, i.e. through the holes, extend through the second metal layer. This etching can, however, be maintained until a desired thickness of the second metal layer is obtained.
Preferably, the electrochemical etching of the second metal layer from the inside, i.e. through the holes formed in the first metal layer and the insulating sheet, is maintained until said holes are extended into the second metal layer to an average depth that is at least 2 μm deeper than the final thickness of the second metal layer. Then, when the second metal layer is etched from the outside, the holes in the second metal layer will be uncovered, and the edges of the holes will have a consistent quality.
In a preferred embodiment, the initial thickness of the second metal layer exceeds the initial thickness of the first metal layer by 5 to 15 μm, preferably by 8 to 12 μm. This extra thickness can be used to first etch the holes in the second metal layer from the inside to a depth that exceeds the final thickness of the second metal layer. Then, the extra initial thickness of the second metal layer can be removed by etching from the outside, thus uncovering the holes in the second metal layer. Preferably, the final thicknesses of the first and second metal layers differ by less than 2 μm, leading to a symmetric structure which is believed to lead to a better performance of the device. The average final thickness of the first and second metal layers is preferably between 4 μm and 7 μm.
As mentioned before, in a preferred embodiment, the initial thickness of the second metal layer is larger than the initial thickness of the first layer. However, prefabricated blank sheets with different thicknesses of cladding layers may be difficult to obtain commercially. Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment, the aforementioned step of preparing a blank sheet comprises a step of adding to the thickness of the second metal layer by an electrolytic process.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, the inventor found that the second metal layer hole forming step can also be performed by ordinary chemical etching, i.e. without electrochemical etching, provided that the initial thicknesses of the first and second metal layers are appropriately chosen. According to this alternative method, the first and second metal layers are etched from the outside, thereby reducing the initial thickness of the first and second metal layers, and simultaneously the second metal layer is etched from the inside, i.e. through the holes in the first metal layer and the insulating sheet. In this second metal layer hole forming step, the etching is maintained until the holes extend through the second metal layer.
The inventor have discovered that if the initial average thickness of the first and second metal layers is between 6.5 and 25 μm, preferably between 7.5 and 12 μm, a high quality GEM even at very large sizes can be obtained.
The lower boundary of 6.5 μm, preferably 7.5 μm for the first and second metal layers is to guarantee a good yield in the manufacturing process. Below this low boundary, there is a risk that by the time all of the holes extend through the second metal layer, at some places too much if not all of the metal may unintentionally be etched away, which would compromise the function of the final GEM.
On the other hand, the upper boundary of 25 μm, preferably 12 μm will ensure that the second metal layer hole forming step will not take too long, such that the rings of exposed insulating sheet around the holes on the first metal layer side do not exceed an acceptable width, where the “acceptable width” is determined by the function of the final device. According to observations of the inventor, the width of such an exposed ring should not exceed 25 μm, preferably not exceed 15 μm. However, by appropriately choosing the initial thicknesses and the corresponding etching step as will be shown in a specific example below, an acceptable ring-like structure of say 8 μm can be obtained without the need of electrochemical etching.
In the second metal layer hole forming step of the second aspect of the invention, the blank is preferably etched in a bath containing ammonium persulfate. The bath is preferably kept at a temperature of 20° C. to 30° C., preferably 23° C. to 27° C.
The following preferred embodiments relate to both of the above manufacturing methods.
Preferably, the first and second metal layers are made from copper. The insulating sheet is preferably made from a polymer material, such as polyimide. In a preferred embodiment, a thin chromium layer is provided between the copper layer and the insulating layer to improve the adhesion of the copper on top of the polyimide.
The photolithographic first metal layer hole forming step preferably comprises the steps of providing a photoresist on both metal layers, placing a mask on top of the first metal layer defining the location of the holes to be formed, exposing and developing the photoresist on both sides of the blank such that the whole second metal layer is covered by the photoresist and the first metal layer is covered by the photoresist except for the places where the holes are to be formed, and etching the holes in the first metal layer. Preferably, the first metal layer is etched using iron perchloride at 30° C. to 40° C.
In a preferred embodiment, the insulating sheet hole forming step is performed such that the diameter of the end of the hole adjacent to the first metal layer differs from the diameter of the hole at the end adjacent to the second metal layer by less than 20%, preferably by less than 15%. Some examples how to ensure this acceptable variation of hole diameter will be given below.
The insulating sheet hole forming step preferably comprises dipping the blank sheet in a bath comprising 55% to 65% diamine ethylene and 35% to 45% water, and in addition 5 to 10 g/l KOH. The temperature is preferably 60° C. to 80° C., and more preferably 65° C. to 75° C.
In the insulating layer hole forming process, the etchant may be stirred by generating bubbles therein, such as nitrogen bubbles. This stirring leads to a more cylindrical shape of the holes rather than a conical shape.
Preferably, there is an additional step of forming electrodes for connecting the first and second metal layers by means of photolithography. In this additional photolithography step, a frame similar to frame 22 of
For the purposes of promoting and understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the preferred embodiment illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended, such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated method and such further applications of the principles of the invention as illustrated therein being contemplated as would normally occur now and in the future to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.
In the following description of the figures, similar or corresponding parts of different figures have been denoted with identical reference signs.
With reference to
1.1. First Metal Layer Hole Forming Step
In a first metal layer hole forming step, the first copper layer 14 and the underlying chromium film 30 are patterned to form an upper portion of the holes 18 to be formed through the GEM. In this first metal layer hole forming step, the first and second copper layers 14, 16 are laminated with a thin photoresist (KL1015). Next, a masking film is placed on top of the first copper layer 14, on which the pattern of the holes 18 to be formed is printed. No mask is provided on top of the second copper layer 16. Next, the blank sheet 28 is exposed by intense light from both sides. The exposure is performed in a machine DUPONT PC 130. The photoresist used is a negative photoresist, which becomes chemically more stable upon exposure. Then, the photoresist is developed by means of a Na2CO3 spray in a RESCO machine at a speed of 0.7 m/min at 35° C. During this developing, the resist is removed at the locations where the holes 18 are to be formed. The diameter of the holes in the photoresist are checked. In the present embodiment, the diameters shall be 55 μm+/−2 μm.
Next, the first copper layer 14 is etched in a conveyer machine at 35° C., such that holes 18 are formed through the first copper layer 14. For the etchant, iron perchloride is used at a temperature of 35° C. After etching, the holes in the first copper layer 14 are checked to have a size of 60 μm+/−2 μm. This part of the process with a hole in the first copper layer 14 is shown in panel B of
Next, the photoresist is stripped off in a bath of ethyl alcohol. Then, the thin chromium layer within hole 18 is stripped by immersing the blank sheet 28 in a bath of potassium permanganate at 60° C. for 15 seconds (see panel C of
1.2. Insulating Sheet Hole Forming Step
Next, in an insulating sheet hole forming step, the hole 18 formed in the first copper layer 14 is extended vertically through the polyimide layer 12. This is done by etching in a bath containing 60% of diamine ethylene, 40% of water and in addition, 7 g/l KOH. The temperature of the bath is 70° C.
As is seen in panel D of
1.3. Electrode and Frame Forming Step
While not shown in
1.4. Second Metal Layer Hole Forming Step
Next, the holes 18 are extended through the second copper layer 16. This etching step is performed in a bath of ammonium persulfate at a temperature of 25° C. The blank sheet 28 is kept in the bath until the holes 18 extend through the second copper layer 16. The end of this etching step can easily be determined by visual inspection: as soon as light shines through the blank sheet 18, this etching step shall be finished.
In this etching step, the first and second copper layers 14, 16 are etched from “the outside”, i.e. with reference to
On the other hand, the initial thicknesses of the first and second copper layers 14, 16 should not be too large either. When etching the copper layers 14, 16 to complete the hole 18 through the second copper layer 16, the first copper layer 14 will be removed from an area around the edge of each hole 18, such that a ring-like area 32 on the first surface of the polyimide sheet 12 surrounding the hole 18 is formed, which is not covered by the copper layer 14 anymore. The inventor have found out that in operation of the final GEM, the performance will be deteriorated if the exposed rings 32 are too big. The width of this exposed ring portions 32 should be 15 μm or less, preferably 10 μm or less. The larger the initial thickness of the copper layers 14, 16, the larger will the width of the exposed ring portion 32 eventually be. Accordingly, the initial thicknesses of the first and second copper layers 14, 16 shall be less than 25 μm, preferably even less than 12 μm.
With an initial copper layer thickness of 8 μm and the process parameters as summarized above, the width of the exposed ring portion 32 on the first surface of the polyimide sheet 12 was 8 μm only, which is narrow enough such as to not adversely affect the functioning of the final GEM 10. With an initial thickness of 15 μm, the widths of the exposed ring-like portions 32 were about 15 μm, which turned out to be inferior in operation of the final GEM 10, but still acceptable. Also, an additional ring-like exposed portion 34 is formed on the second surface of the polyimide sheet 12, but this ring is considerably smaller than the one on the first surface.
1.5. Cleaning and Testing
Finally, the GEM 10 with the holes 18 formed as mentioned above is cleaned in a manner known per se. However, the cleaning method according to one embodiment is chosen such that the thin chromium layer 30 covering the exposed ring-like portions 32 and 34 is not stripped off. In particular, no potassium permanganate is used in the cleaning step, as this would remove the chromium layer. When the chromium layer remains on the exposed ring-like portions 32, 34, the function of the final GEM will be better than if the insulating polyimide is directly exposed. Alternatively, the cleaning method could be chosen such that the chromium layer is removed partly or completely.
As a final step, the device is tested by applying a voltage of about 600 V between the first and second copper layers 14, 16 and measuring a current therebetween at reduced humidity of 35%. The test is passed if the current measured is below a predetermined threshold.
Second Embodiment
Next, a second embodiment of the invention is described with reference to
The patterning of the first copper layer 14 and the underlying chromium layer is performed similarly as described in section 1.1. above and shall not be repeated here. Panel B of
The insulating sheet hole forming step is also similar to that of the first embodiment described in section 1.2. above. However, as compared to panel D of
The main difference with regard to the first embodiment relates to the second metal layer hole forming step. For forming the holes through the second copper layer 16, in this embodiment, the blank sheet 28 is immersed in a bath based on sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid and copper sulfate. In addition, an electrode (not shown) is immersed in the bath about 5 cm away from the blank sheet 28 on the side facing the first copper layer 14. A voltage is applied between the second metal layer 16 and the electrode (not shown) such that the electrode forms a cathode and the second copper layer 16 forms an anode. Due to the voltage between the second copper layer 16 (anode) and the cathode (not shown), an electrolytical process is initiated, where an electric current flows in the etchant and ions in the etchant react in etching manner with the second copper layer 16. Since in this step of the method, the cathode (not shown) is disposed such as to face the first copper layer 14, or in other words is placed above the blank sheet 28 as shown in
Next, the cathode is placed on the opposite side of the blank sheet 28 such that it is now facing the second copper layer 16 side of the blank sheet 28. The electrochemical etching is continued, this time etching the second copper layer 16 from the outside, such that its thickness is continuously decreased until it reaches about 5 μm and thus coincides with the thickness of the first copper layer 14. Since the holes had been extended into the second copper layer 16 to a depth of at least 7 μm in the previous step, the holes 18 will be exposed such that a structure as shown in panel D of
The electrochemical etching is preferably performed at room temperature and with a current density on the order of 0.5 A/dm2.
Electrochemical etching allows to selectively etch the second copper layer 16 without damaging the first copper layer 14. Also, by changing the electrochemical etching direction, i.e. by switching the side on which the cathode is disposed, holes with excellent shape quality can be obtained. After this second metal layer hole forming process, the final GEM is cleaned and tested in a similar way as described above.
Although preferred exemplary embodiments are shown and specified in detail in the drawings and the preceding specification, this should be viewed as purely exemplary and not as limiting the invention. It is noted in this regard that only the preferred exemplary embodiments are shown and specified, and all variations and modifications should be protected that presently or in the future lie within the scope of protection of the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2008/002944 | 4/14/2008 | WO | 00 | 12/29/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/127220 | 10/22/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5455459 | Fillion et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
6468438 | Shin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
20040011666 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050158574 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060102384 | Watanabe et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0936660 | Aug 1999 | EP |
1401969 | Aug 1975 | GB |
WO 2006115249 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Benlloch et al., Development of the Gas Electron Multipiler, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 45, No. 3, Jun. 1998, 234-243. |
da Silva et al., An Innovative “ChemicalVia” Process for the Prodection of High Density Interconnect Printed Circuit Boards, Circuit World 30/4 (2004), 27-33. |
Altunbas, et al., “Construction, test and commissioning of the triple-gem tracking detector for compass”, Nucl. Instrum. Methods, vol. 490, pp. 177-203, 2002. |
European Patent Office; Authorized Officer: Stephane Lachaud, Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration and International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/EP2008/002944, mailed Dec. 16, 2008, 15 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110089042 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |