Method of manufacturing a stiff engineered composite

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11420366
  • Patent Number
    11,420,366
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, September 7, 2016
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 23, 2022
    a year ago
Abstract
The method of making a compressed biocomposite body includes compressing a mass of biocomposite material comprised of discrete particles and a network of interconnected glucan-containing mycelia cells in the presence of heat and moisture into a compressed body having a density in excess of 18 pcf. Compression may take place batch wise in a press or continuously in a path of narrowing cross-section defined by a series of heated rollers.
Description

This invention relates to a method of manufacturing a stiff engineered composite. More particularly, this invention relates to a method of producing stiff mycelium bound parts.


As is known, conventional methods for producing nonstructural boards rely on compressing wood veneer sheets, fibers, or particles and binding them together with resin to form composites like hardwood plywood and medium density fiberboard, which are used for applications such as furniture and fixtures, cabinetry, paneling, molding and athletic equipment. The ingredients for these typical non-structural boards require considerable pre-processing, and the feedstocks, especially timber and resins, are subject to considerable price volatility. Additionally, many of the resins used to produce non-structural boards are carcinogenic and can emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs).


Much like nonstructural boards, structural boards are produced by compressing wood veneer sheets, fibers, or particles and binding them together with resin to form composites like oriented strand board (OSB) and softwood plywood. OSB and softwood plywood are used for applications such as wall sheathing, floor sheathing, and concrete framework. These structural boards face the same concerns that nonstructural boards face because they use similar feedstocks and resins.


Many structural and nonstructural boards are used for applications in furniture, cabinetry, and fixtures where they must be cut, milled, and sanded to form the desired shape. Such post processing is expensive and time consuming and creates material waste as the products are shaped. Plastics are also used for these applications and require expensive tools and machines for molding in their production processes.


US Published Patent Application 2008/0145577 describes various techniques for making self-supporting composite bodies comprised of discrete particles and a network of interconnected mycelium cells bonding the particles together. As described therein, the composite bodies may be formed into panels as well as into panel systems with a composite core.


It is an object of this invention to provide an improved process for the manufacture of a compressed composite body of particle/mycelium.


Briefly, the invention provides a method of achieving adhesion between a matrix of fungal mycelium and a slurry of particles and/or fibers (natural or synthetic) through a heated compression process.


US Published Patent Application 2008/0145577 has demonstrated that fungal mycelium can bind natural (lignocellulosic and chitinous waste streams) and/or synthetic (fiberglass) particles together during a controlled incubation process. The mycelium in the latter instance serves as a grown adhesive, digesting a portion of the particles and fibers while encapsulating the slurry in a network of a vegetative tissue.


The process described within demonstrates that the extracellular matrix of mycelium, known as the matrix layer of the cell wall and comprised of polysaccharides (alpha and beta glucans), polymerized amino sugars (N-glucosamine, chitin), monoproteins, and phosopholipids, can serve as a traditional adhesive when heated and dried concurrently. The mycelium is either grown on, or mixed with, an engineered substrate of natural and/or synthetic particles and/or fibers and then compressed under heat and dried to desired geometry.


The heating of the mycelium matrix actually provides value in two places, which makes this process distinctly different from the prior art. The fungal cell wall is comprised of chitin and glucans. The glucans, when heated and saturated with the moisture embedded within the composite, begin to flow like a traditional resin and when dried stick the particles together beyond the traditional mycelium matrix.


By creating sheets of material made from particles bound together with mycelium (hereinafter “the biocomposite material”) and compressing these sheets together, bio-based nonstructural boards can be created with feedstocks. The sheets of biocomposite material can be grown together or compressed together with heat to set and dry the final product. The sheets of biocomposite material can vary in product density, fiber content, particle size, and fiber orientation to selectively promote specific mechanical properties (screw hold strength, core shear, modulus of elasticity).


Further, a large mass of mycelium can be cultivated on particles or fibers, milled to a consistent particle size and then pressed in a constrained heated tool.


Additionally, VOCs are not a concern for structural boards produced in this manner because no VOC emitting resins are used in the production process, and the cross-linking occurs between the biochemical construct of the fungal cell wall.


There are significant mechanical advantages garnered from compressing sheets of mycelium bound particles into a single cohesive product with heightened temperatures (200° F.-650° F.) while compressing the biocomposite material at a pressure of from 10 to 1500 psi. These advantages include enhanced modulus of rupture and elasticity (stiffness), and the ability to layer sheets of varying particles size to achieve greater stiffness or dimensional stability (squareness, flatness).


Other materials, including veneers, textiles, or laminates, that are comprised of wood, plastics (polyester scrim), foam, natural fibers, stone, metal, or the like can be grown and bound to the face or internal structure of the mycelium and particle sheets. These laminates can be stacked and interlaid to the mycelium colonized particle sheets, and then compressed to a desired form (flat or molded).


Structural boards can be created by compressing thick blocks of grown material or layered sheets of grown material (particles and/or fibers bound by mycelium) while drying with heat (radiation, conduction, or convective).


Orienting particles within an engineered substrate and then preliminarily binding these with mycelium creates a bio-based product that does not emit VOCs.


The compressed biocomposite material can be easily and cheaply shaped during production. The grown material can be compressed in an inexpensive mold (fiberglass, carbon fiber, composite, wooden and/or metal, e.g. aluminum), giving the material the desired shape and material properties without creating waste. The final product can be dried in the tool to promote cross-linking between the natural polymers within the mycelium, which can occur within the magnitude of minutes.


The grown material can also be compressed in a conductive tool that is heated as well to the final shape, either with a heated platen or inserted cartridges.


These and other objects and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:





The FIGURE schematically illustrates the steps in the method of manufacturing a stiff engineered composite in accordance with the invention.





Referring to the FIGURE, in accordance with the method of the invention, an engineered substrate bound with mycelium 10 is grown into a sheet of appropriate dimensions in step 1. In this respect, the basic steps of the method include:



1. Obtain substrate constituents, including fungal inoculum, a bulking collection of particles and/or fibers, a nutrient source or variety of nutrient sources, and water.



2. Combine the substrate constituents by mixing together in volumetric or mass ratios to obtain a solid media with the inoculum (cell and/or tissue culture) added during or following the mixing process.



3. Place the growth media in an enclosure or series of enclosures of the desired geometry.



4. Allow the mycelia to grow through the substrate, creating a composite with a geometry matching the enclosure. This may be either the final geometry or the near net geometry of the final product.



4
a. For parts that are dried in compression, the mycelium does not have to grow on the engineered substrate but could be grown in a secondary process and thoroughly intermixed to distribute culture just prior to compressive drying (conduction, convection, radiation).



5. Repeat steps 1-3 for applications where materials are layered or embedded to create the desired final composite media. Alternatively to steps 3 and 4, the growth media may be grown as a solid mass, and then ground up for later steps or placed in an enclosure of the desired shape and then be allowed to regrow into that shape.


In step 2 of the method, the engineered substrate 10 containing some residual moisture and, for example in the form of a flat rectangular plate or tile, is placed in a compression fixture 11, for example, a pinch press 11. As illustrated, the pinch press 11 has a bottom platen 12 that can be heated and that is formed with a mold body 13 of predetermined shape, for example, of semi-cylindrical shape. The pinch press 11 also has a top platen 14 for engaging on the bottom platen 12 with a cavity 15 within the platen 14 for mating about the mold body 13. Typically, when the platens 12, 14 are closed together, a semi-cylindrical gap exists between the mold body 13 and the cavity 15.


Typically, the engineered substrate 10 should contain a minimum of 10% moisture by weight. Steam may also be injected into a dry mass during compression to induce the adhesion.


Since the glucans are activated by steam, the engineered substrate 10 should contain a minimum of 40% moisture by weight so that the moisture may be transformed into steam during the heated pressing process as otherwise live steam would be injected into the dry mass during compression to induce the adhesion.


After positioning of the engineered substrate 10 on the mold body 13 of the pinch press 11, the top platen 14 is lowered onto the bottom platen 12 in order to compress, trim and dry the biocomposite material of the substrate 10.


During operation, the pinch press 11 is heated to 300° F. while compressing the biocomposite material of the substrate to between 10 psi and 1500 psi. The length of time that the biocomposite material of the substrate 10 is retained within the pinch press 11 under heat and pressure is sufficient to the reduce the moisture content of the material to less than 10% by weight and to promote cross-linking between the natural polymers within the mycelium. The biocomposite material can also be held in the pinch press 11 for a time sufficient to achieve a product stiffness that is sufficient to remove the compressed material from the pinch press 11 (“tool” or “buck”).


In step 3 of the method, with the pinch press 11 opened, a compressed monolithic body 16 is removed from the pinch press 11. As illustrated, the monolithic body 16 has a semi-cylindrical shape and is characterized as being a rigid shell.


Variations

Additional methods can also be used to produce desirable properties in the final composite.


1. The substrate of engineered particles and/or fibers (“biocomposite material”), either colonized with mycelium (bioactive) or intermixed with mycelium (inactive), can also include cation salts (divalent Na2+ and the like) that can assist with cross-linking between the polysaccharides and amino sugars. Acids (hydrochloric, acetic, lactic) can be provided as well to ensure the substrate stays protonated.


a. The cation salts can be applied during initial substrate preparation and sterilization.


b. The cations can be applied in a solution by either vacuum infusing the solution into the substrate or immersing the substrate in a cation solution for a certain period of time.


2. Surface treatments, such as laminates, veneers, or supplemental fibers, can be bound to the engineered substrate. For example, a laminate can be placed on the face of the engineered substrate during the initial growth step. This is “colonization”. Alternatively, a laminate may be applied to the engineered substrate just before pressing and bound with only the glucans.


The laminate treatments are applied to the surfaces, or in between tiles if multiple colonized blocks are used, and pressed with a heated platen until the biocomposite material is <10% moisture.


Laminations and inserts can also be pressed into the surface of a colonized engineered substrate, again using the adhesion from the glucans. The laminations can include non-woven textiles, woven products (jute, fiberglass), and Kraft paper, which become an integrated component of the final part.


Inserts can be positioned in either the lower or upper platens of the compression tooling, and can be pressed into the biological composite during the setting process.


3. The biocomposite material can also be dried to a particular moisture content with conduction, convection, and/or radiation at atmospheric pressure, and then compression dried to complete the process.


4. The biocomposite material can be dried to a moisture content of between 6% and 30% during the heated compression stage to retain enough moisture to impart electrical conductivity such that the resultant compressed monolithic body can be powder coated since a powder coating process requires the material to be electrically conductive and moisture, rather than metals salts, is used to impart this characteristic.


a. The heated compression tool, which forms the final product geometry, can include surface finishes that translate to the final part.


5. The colonized biocomposite material can be compressed and dried with a series of heated rollers that narrow in cross-section as the material is conveyed through the process.


Sheets of biocomposite material can be grown together or compressed together with heat to set and dry the final product. The sheets of biocomposite material can vary in product density, fiber content, particle size, and fiber orientation to selectively promote specific mechanical properties (screw hold strength, core shear, modulus of elasticity). Additionally, VOCs are not a concern for structural boards produced in this manner because no VOC emitting resins are used in the production process, and the cross-linking occurs between the biochemical construct of the fungal cell wall.


There are significant mechanical advantages garnered from compressing sheets of mycelium bound particles into a single cohesive product with heightened temperatures (200° F.-650° F.). These advantages include enhanced modulus of rupture and elasticity (stiffness), and the ability to layer sheets of varying particles size to achieve greater stiffness or dimensional stability (squareness, flatness). Other materials, including veneers, textiles, or laminates, that are comprised of wood, plastics (polyester scrim), foam, natural fibers, stone, metal, or the like can be grown and bound to the face or internal structure of the mycelium and particle sheets. These laminates can be stacked and interlaid to the mycelium colonized particle sheets, and then compressed to a desired form (flat or molded).


The method of the invention allows a final part to have a density between 18 and 60 lbs/ft3, an elastic modulus up to 250 ksi and a modulus of rupture as high as 2500 psi.


Further Variations

Where the growth media is grown as a solid mass and then ground up to produce particles or pellets with mycelium therein, the particles may be poured into an enclosure of the desired shape and then heated and pressed with the process parameters described above. In this embodiment, the final product has a Modulus of Elasticity of 111 psi and a Modulus of Rupture of 2840 psi.


The method provides for crosslinking to occur between the glucans in the mycelia that are solubilized during the compression and moisture release process. This can be further mediated with mild acids that assist in protonating and cross-linking.


EXAMPLE 1

1. Kenaf pith (screened over a 0.375″ screen, 42% of mass), maltodextrin (1.6% of mass), calcium sulfate (0.4% of mass), and water (56% of mass) are mixed in an autoclavable bag to form the substrate for fungal growth. For five liters of substrate, the amount of Kenaf pith is 670 grams (g).


2. The bag is sterilized in a pressure cooker at 15 psi and 240° F. for 60 minutes.


3. Millet grain spawn containing fungal tissue is mixed into the substrate (10% [m:m].


4. Plastic tool molds that are 6 inches long, 6 inches wide, and 1 inch deep are filled with inoculated substrate.


5. The substrate is allowed to colonize in the tools for 7 days at ambient laboratory conditions (75° F., 20% relative humidity, 2000 ppm CO2)


6. Wooden veneers that are 6 inches wide by 6 inches long and a square of porous plastic with same dimensions are soaked in 10% hydrogen peroxide for 30 minutes. This is a chemical disinfection method that also imparts the correct amount of water, since hydrogen peroxide oxidizes to water.


7. The substrates in the form of tiles are ejected from the mold and stacked in groups of three with a wooden veneer at each surface and interface and the porous plastic square on the side that will be next to an air inlet during compression.


8. The stack of tiles, veneers, and porous plastic is compressed to approximately 3 times density in a compression frame with an air inlet for forced aeration on one side and holes for passive ventilation on the other. For example, as described in Provisional Patent Application 61/860,386, filed Jul. 31, 2103, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein.


9. The compression frame is hooked up to an air pump and the compressed substrate is subjected to forced aeration for 5 days. Alternatively, the compressed substrate may be dried within the compression frame with convective or conductive drying.


10. The compressed composite body is ejected from the compression frame and placed in an aluminum collar of the same exterior dimensions that surrounds the periphery of the compressed composite body. This collar that has the desired features, locks and creates the features and dimensions required of the final part.


11. A heated platen press (at a force of 20 ton and 600° F.) is compressed onto the pre-compressed body for two minutes, such that the body is dried to <10% moisture content.


The resulting part has a density of 20 lbs/ft3, a modulus of elasticity around 80 ksi, a modulus of rupture around 800 psi, and a screw hold strength around 100 lbf.


In this example, the biocomposite material is subjected to compression alone to form a compressed monolithic body, e.g. as described in as described in Provisional Patent Application 61/860,386, filed Jul. 31, 2103, and then subjected to heat and pressure to promote cross-linking between the natural polymers within the mycelium.


EXAMPLE 2

1. Kenaf pith (screened over a 0.375″ screen, 42% of mass), maltodextrin (1.6% of mass), calcium sulfate (0.4% of mass), and water (56% of mass) are mixed in an autoclavable bag to form the substrate for fungal growth.


2. The bag is sterilized in a pressure cooker at 15 psi and 240° F. for 60 minutes.


3. Millet grain spawn containing fungal tissue is mixed into the substrate (10% [m:m].


4. Plastic tool molds that are 6 inches long, 6 inches wide, and 1 inch deep are filled with inoculated substrate.


5. The substrate is allowed to colonize in the tools (molds) for 7 days at ambient laboratory conditions (75° F., 20% relative humidity, 2000 ppm CO2)


6. The colonized substrate is ejected from the plastic tool that granted the growing mass its original structure and placed in an aluminum collar that is perforated to allow for water to escape.


The colonized substrate is placed in a heated platen press (20 ton, 600° F.) and is compressed for four minutes, such that the part is dried to <10% moisture content. The colonized substrate requires between 25 psi and 5000 psi to achieve the maximum compression required.


The resulting part has a density of 34 lbs/ft3, a modulus of elasticity around 132 ksi, a modulus of rupture around 1698 psi, and a screw hold strength around 24 lbf at half an inch thickness. By way of comparison, a composite for packaging made in accordance with the methods described in US Published Patent Application 2008/0145577 has a density of from 5 to 8 lbs/ft3.


EXAMPLE 3

1. Kenaf pith (screened over a 0.375″ screen, 42% of mass), maltodextrin (1.6% of mass), calcium sulfate (0.4% of mass), and water (56% of mass) are mixed in an autoclavable bag to form the substrate for fungal growth.


2. The bag is sterilized in a pressure cooker at 15 psi and 240° F. for 60 minutes.


3. Millet grain spawn containing fungal tissue is mixed into the substrate (10%) [m:m].


4. Growth enclosure molds that are fabricated out of thermoformed polyethylene plastic to the final product geometry or near net shape are filled with inoculated substrate.


5. The substrate is allowed to colonize in the tools (molds) for 7 days at ambient laboratory conditions (75° F., 20% relative humidity, 2000 ppm CO2)


6. The colonized substrate is ejected from the plastic tool that granted the growing mass its original structure and placed in a structural enclosure of the final product configuration. This second enclosure permits conductive heating and is designed to allow for the installation of embedded inserts or secondary components. The tool is perforated to allow for water to escape.


7. The colonized substrate in the second enclosure is placed in a heated platen press (20 ton, 600° F.) and is compressed for four minutes, such that the part is dried to <10% moisture content.


The resulting part has a density of 29 lbs/ft3, a modulus of elasticity around 120 ksi, a modulus of rupture around 819 psi, and a screw hold strength around 132 lbf at an inch thickness.


EXAMPLE 4

1. Kenaf pith (screened over a 0.375″ screen, 42% of mass), maltodextrin (1.6% of mass), calcium sulfate (0.4% of mass), and water (56% of mass) are mixed in an autoclavable bag to form the substrate for fungal growth.


2. The bag is sterilized in a pressure cooker at 15 psi and 240° F. for 60 minutes.


3. Millet grain spawn containing fungal tissue is mixed into the substrate (10% [m:m].


4. Plastic tool molds that are 18 inches long, 18 inches wide, and 1 inch deep are filled with inoculated substrate.


5. The substrate is allowed to colonize in the tools (molds) for 7 days at ambient laboratory conditions (75° F., 20% relative humidity, 2000 ppm CO2)


6. The colonized substrate, in the form of a sheet, is ejected from the plastic tool and aligned in a heated pinch press of a desired geometry.


7. The colonized part is pressed and heated (300° F.) for one minute, such that the part is dried to <10% moisture content, molded to the desired shape, and excess material trimmed from the final product.


EXAMPLE 5

1. Fabricate the biocomposite material into a flat blank board of 1.25″ thickness with a 0.25″ hemp nonwoven matt grown into either face.


2. Press the flat blank board into the predetermined curved shape, such as a shape for a chair back, along with surface features under a compressive force of 3000 psi and 340° F. for 10 minutes to lock the surface features and get the board to below 10% moisture.


The surface feature may be obtained by embossing at least one face of the board with a predetermined sculptured feature using an embossing surface on the face of the press that is pressed against the board.


When using a mold (tool), a mold release, such as a spray release or a parchment paper, may be used on the surfaces of the mold to enable an easy ejection of the colonized substrate from the mold.


The invention thus provides a compressed composite body of particle/mycelium that is characterized in being a rigid body having a density in the range of from 18 to 60 lbs/ft3, a modulus of elasticity of up to 250 ksi (1 k=1000 psi) and a modulus of rupture of up to 2500 psi.


The compressed composite body made in accordance with the methods described herein differs from a compressed composite body made in accordance with the methods described in Provisional Patent Application 61/860,386, filed Jul. 31, 2013, inter alia, in that due to conductive drying, the glucans are cross-linked and all the water is removed.


The composite body made in accordance with the invention may be subjected to further processing steps to achieve a desired final product. For example, the composite body may be die cut to a desired three-dimensional shape; drilled or cut to provide openings therein; and the like.


Further, an assemblage of flat sheets of biocomposite material, sheets of woven or non-woven laminations and inserts of three-dimensional contour (i.e. inserts on non-flattened shape) may be heated and pressed together to form a desired final product having an internal shape corresponding to the inserts.

Claims
  • 1. A self-supporting composite body comprising a substrate of discrete fibers and a network of interconnected mycelia cells extending through and around the discrete fibers and bonding the discrete fibers together, said self-supporting composite body being characterized in being stiff and in having a density between 18 and 60 pounds per cubic foot, a modulus of elasticity greater than 250 ksi and a modulus of rupture of up to 2500 psi.
  • 2. The self-supporting composite body of claim 1, characterized in being of a predetermined shape.
  • 3. The self-supporting composite body of claim 2, said predetermined shape is a deformed geometric shape.
  • 4. The self-supporting composite body of claim 2, wherein said predetermined shape is a curved shape.
  • 5. The self-supporting composite body of claim 2, wherein said predetermined shape is a semi-cylindrical shape.
  • 6. The self-supporting composite body of claim 1, characterized in being a structural board.
  • 7. The self-supporting composite body of claim 1, characterized in being a non-structural board.
  • 8. The self-supporting composite body of claim 1, characterized in being embossed.
  • 9. The self-supporting composite body of claim 1, wherein said self-supporting composite body comprises a predetermined sculptured feature.
  • 10. The self-supporting composite body of claim 1, further comprising at least one layer selected from a group consisting of wood, plastic, foam, natural fibers, stone, metal, non-woven textiles, jute, fiberglass, and Kraft paper.
  • 11. The self-supporting composite body of claim 1, wherein the discrete fibers are selected from a group consisting of lignocellulose, chitin, and fiberglass.
  • 12. The self-supporting composite body of claim 2, further comprising at least one layer selected from a group consisting of wood, plastic, foam, natural fibers, stone, metal, non-woven textiles, jute, fiberglass, and Kraft paper.
  • 13. The self-supporting composite body of claim 2, wherein the discrete fibers are selected from a group consisting of lignocellulose, chitin, and fiberglass.
  • 14. The self-supporting composite body of claim 6, further comprising at least one layer selected from a group consisting of wood, plastic, foam, natural fibers, stone, metal, non-woven textiles, jute, fiberglass, and Kraft paper.
  • 15. The self-supporting composite body of claim 6, wherein the discrete fibers are selected from a group consisting of lignocellulose, chitin, and fiberglass.
  • 16. The self-supporting composite body of claim 7, further comprising at least one layer selected from a group consisting of wood, plastic, foam, natural fibers, stone, metal, non-woven textiles, jute, fiberglass, and Kraft paper.
  • 17. The self-supporting composite body of claim 7, wherein the discrete fibers are selected from a group consisting of lignocellulose, chitin, and fiberglass.
  • 18. The self-supporting composite body of claim 8, further comprising at least one layer selected from a group consisting of wood, plastic, foam, natural fibers, stone, metal, non-woven textiles, jute, fiberglass, and Kraft paper.
  • 19. The self-supporting composite body of claim 8, wherein the discrete fibers are selected from a group consisting of lignocellulose, chitin, and fiberglass.
  • 20. The self-supporting composite body of claim 9, further comprising at least one layer selected from a group consisting of wood, plastic, foam, natural fibers, stone, metal, non-woven textiles, jute, fiberglass, and Kraft paper.
  • 21. The self-supporting composite body of claim 9, wherein the discrete fibers are selected from a group consisting of lignocellulose, chitin, and fiberglass.
Parent Case Info

This application claims the benefit of Provisional Patent Application 61/890,433, filed Oct. 14, 2013 and is a Division of U.S. Ser. No. 14/510,912 filed Oct. 9, 2014.

US Referenced Citations (265)
Number Name Date Kind
1979176 Schicht Oct 1934 A
2509984 Morrow May 1950 A
2657647 Rapisarda Nov 1953 A
2723493 Stoller Nov 1955 A
2815621 Carter Dec 1957 A
2964070 Linhardt Dec 1960 A
3268606 Jaeger Aug 1966 A
3316592 Forrest May 1967 A
3317375 Molinet et al. May 1967 A
3421554 Carter Jan 1969 A
3477558 Fleischauer Nov 1969 A
3499261 Hullhorst et al. Mar 1970 A
3708952 Schulze et al. Jan 1973 A
3717953 Kuhn et al. Feb 1973 A
3782033 Hickerson Jan 1974 A
3810327 Giansante May 1974 A
3828470 Stoller Aug 1974 A
3961938 Iizuka et al. Jun 1976 A
4027427 Stoller et al. Jun 1977 A
4036122 Langen Jul 1977 A
4038807 Beardsley et al. Aug 1977 A
4063383 Green Dec 1977 A
4073956 Yates Feb 1978 A
4127965 Mee Dec 1978 A
4136767 Sarovich Jan 1979 A
4226330 Butler Oct 1980 A
4263744 Stoller Apr 1981 A
4265915 MacLennan et al. May 1981 A
4294929 Solomons et al. Oct 1981 A
4337594 Hanacek et al. Jul 1982 A
4370159 Holtz Jan 1983 A
4568520 Ackermann et al. Feb 1986 A
4620826 Rubio et al. Nov 1986 A
4716712 Gill Jan 1988 A
4722159 Watanabe et al. Feb 1988 A
4878312 Shimizu Nov 1989 A
4922650 Akao et al. May 1990 A
4960413 Sagar et al. Oct 1990 A
5021350 Jung et al. Jun 1991 A
5030425 Bowers-Irons et al. Jul 1991 A
5074959 Yamanaka et al. Dec 1991 A
5085998 Lebron et al. Feb 1992 A
5088860 Stockdale et al. Feb 1992 A
5123203 Hiromoto Jun 1992 A
5230430 Kidder Jul 1993 A
5306550 Nishiyama et al. Apr 1994 A
5335770 Baker et al. Aug 1994 A
5370714 Ogawa Dec 1994 A
5433061 Hutchinson et al. Jul 1995 A
5440860 Meli et al. Aug 1995 A
5475479 Hatakeyama et al. Dec 1995 A
5498384 Volk et al. Mar 1996 A
5503647 Dahlberg et al. Apr 1996 A
5511358 Morita et al. Apr 1996 A
5532217 Silver et al. Jul 1996 A
5569426 Le Blanc Oct 1996 A
5589390 Higuchi et al. Dec 1996 A
5590489 Hattori et al. Jan 1997 A
5598876 Zanini et al. Feb 1997 A
5606836 Insalaco et al. Mar 1997 A
5647180 Billings et al. Jul 1997 A
5681738 Beelman et al. Oct 1997 A
5682929 Maginot et al. Nov 1997 A
5685124 Jandl Nov 1997 A
5711353 Ichikawa et al. Jan 1998 A
5802763 Milstein Sep 1998 A
5854056 Dschida Dec 1998 A
5888803 Starkey Mar 1999 A
5897887 Haeberli Apr 1999 A
5919507 Beelman et al. Jun 1999 A
5944928 Seidner Aug 1999 A
5948674 Mankiewicz Sep 1999 A
5979109 Sartor et al. Nov 1999 A
6041544 Kananen et al. Mar 2000 A
6041835 Price Mar 2000 A
6098677 Wegman et al. Aug 2000 A
6112504 McGregor et al. Sep 2000 A
6197573 Suryanarayan et al. Mar 2001 B1
6226962 Eason et al. May 2001 B1
6300315 Liu Oct 2001 B1
6306921 Al Ghatta et al. Oct 2001 B1
6329185 Kofod et al. Dec 2001 B1
6349988 Foster et al. Feb 2002 B1
6402953 Gorovoj et al. Jun 2002 B1
6425714 Waddell Jul 2002 B1
6444437 Sporleder et al. Sep 2002 B1
6471993 Shastri et al. Oct 2002 B1
6475811 Babcock Nov 2002 B1
6482942 Vittori Nov 2002 B1
6491480 Waddell Dec 2002 B2
6500476 Martin et al. Dec 2002 B1
6523721 Nomoto et al. Feb 2003 B1
6603054 Chen et al. Aug 2003 B2
6620614 Lüth et al. Sep 2003 B1
6660164 Stover Dec 2003 B1
6679301 Makino et al. Jan 2004 B2
6726911 Jülich et al. Apr 2004 B1
7043874 Wasser et al. May 2006 B2
7073306 Hagaman Jul 2006 B1
7122176 Stamets Oct 2006 B2
7179356 Aksay et al. Feb 2007 B2
7395643 Franchini et al. Jul 2008 B2
7514248 Gower et al. Apr 2009 B2
7573031 Behar et al. Aug 2009 B2
7621300 Bonney et al. Nov 2009 B2
7661248 Conti et al. Feb 2010 B2
7754653 Hintz Jul 2010 B2
7836921 Isomura et al. Nov 2010 B2
8001719 Bayer et al. Aug 2011 B2
8205646 Isomura et al. Jun 2012 B2
8227224 Kalisz et al. Jul 2012 B2
8227233 Kalisz et al. Jul 2012 B2
8241415 Wantling et al. Aug 2012 B2
8298810 Rocco et al. Oct 2012 B2
8313939 Kalisz et al. Nov 2012 B2
8517064 Isomura et al. Aug 2013 B2
8658407 Lyons et al. Feb 2014 B2
8763653 Weigel et al. Jul 2014 B2
8999687 Bayer et al. Apr 2015 B2
9079978 Räsänen et al. Jul 2015 B2
9085763 Winiski et al. Jul 2015 B2
9253889 Bayer et al. Feb 2016 B2
9332779 Marga May 2016 B2
9394512 Bayer et al. Jul 2016 B2
9469838 Schaak et al. Oct 2016 B2
9485917 Bayer et al. Nov 2016 B2
9555395 Araldi et al. Jan 2017 B2
9714180 McIntyre et al. Jul 2017 B2
9752122 Marga et al. Sep 2017 B2
9795088 Bayer et al. Oct 2017 B2
9801345 Bayer et al. Oct 2017 B2
9803171 Bayer et al. Oct 2017 B2
9879219 McIntyre et al. Jan 2018 B2
9914906 Winiski et al. Mar 2018 B2
10125347 Winiski Nov 2018 B2
10144149 Araldi et al. Dec 2018 B2
10154627 McIntyre et al. Dec 2018 B2
10172301 McNamara et al. Jan 2019 B2
10266695 Lucht et al. Apr 2019 B2
10407675 Bayer et al. Sep 2019 B2
10525662 Bayer et al. Jan 2020 B2
10537070 Betts et al. Jan 2020 B2
10583626 Bayer et al. Mar 2020 B2
10589489 Bayer et al. Mar 2020 B2
10687482 Ross et al. Jun 2020 B2
10785925 McNamara et al. Sep 2020 B2
11266085 Kaplan-Bie et al. Mar 2022 B2
20010012235 Schuchardt Aug 2001 A1
20020110427 Waddell Aug 2002 A1
20020131828 Waddell Sep 2002 A1
20020131933 Delmotte Sep 2002 A1
20030017565 Echigo et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030056451 Pisek et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030121201 Dahlberg et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030232895 Omidian et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040000090 Miller Jan 2004 A1
20040020553 Amano Feb 2004 A1
20040166576 Sadaie Aug 2004 A1
20040177585 Vermette Sep 2004 A1
20050133536 Kelsey et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137272 Gaserod et al. Jun 2005 A1
20060134265 Beukes Jun 2006 A1
20060280753 McNeary Dec 2006 A1
20070079944 Amidon et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070196509 Riman et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070225328 Fritz et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070227063 Dale et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070294939 Spear et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080017272 Isomura et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080046277 Stamets Feb 2008 A1
20080047966 Carson Feb 2008 A1
20080145577 Bayer et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080234210 Rijn et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080295399 Kawai et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080296295 Kords et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090107040 Vandnhove Apr 2009 A1
20090191289 Lutz et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090241623 Matano et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090246467 Delantar Oct 2009 A1
20090272758 Karwacki et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090307969 Bayer Dec 2009 A1
20090321975 Schlummer Dec 2009 A1
20100101190 Dillon Apr 2010 A1
20100158976 O'Brien et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100159509 Xu et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100199601 Boldrini et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100227931 Kuwano et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100243135 Pepper et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100326564 Isomura et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110094154 Joaquin Apr 2011 A1
20110108158 Huwiler et al. May 2011 A1
20110265688 Kalisz et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110268980 Kalisz et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110269209 Rocco et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110269214 Kalisz et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110306107 Kalisz et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120000165 Williams Jan 2012 A1
20120006446 Isomura et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120060446 Merz Mar 2012 A1
20120076895 Kirejevas et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120115199 Li et al. May 2012 A1
20120132314 Weigel et al. May 2012 A1
20120135504 Ross May 2012 A1
20120225471 McIntyre et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120227899 McIntyre et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120231140 Hofmann et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120270031 Guan et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120270302 Bayer et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120315687 Bayer et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130095560 McIntyre et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130105036 Smith et al. May 2013 A1
20130210327 Corominas Aug 2013 A1
20130224840 Bayer et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130274892 Lelkes et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130309755 McIntyre et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140038619 Moulsley Feb 2014 A1
20140056653 Scully et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140069004 Bayer et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140093618 Forgacs et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140163142 Zhang Jun 2014 A1
20140173977 Juscius Jun 2014 A1
20140371352 Dantin et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150033620 Greetham et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150038619 McIntyre et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150101509 McIntyre et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150197358 Larsen Jul 2015 A1
20150342138 Bayer et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150342224 Medoff Dec 2015 A1
20160002589 Winiski Jan 2016 A1
20160264926 Winiski et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160355779 Ross Dec 2016 A1
20170000040 Bayer et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170071214 Rehage Mar 2017 A1
20170218327 Amstislavski et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170253849 Miller et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170253852 Bayer et al. Sep 2017 A1
20180014468 Ross et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180148682 Ross May 2018 A1
20180282529 Kaplan-Bie Oct 2018 A1
20180368337 McIntyre et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190059431 Kozubal et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190090436 Betts et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190284307 Chase et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190322997 Schaak Oct 2019 A1
20190330668 Kozubal et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190338240 Carlton et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190357454 Mueller et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190359931 Mueller et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190390156 Bayer et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200024577 Carlton et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200025672 Scullin et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200055274 Bayer et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200095535 Kozubal et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200102530 Winiski et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200146224 Kaplan-Bie et al. May 2020 A1
20200157506 Bayer et al. May 2020 A1
20200208097 Winiski Jul 2020 A1
20200239830 O'Brien et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200268031 Macur et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200270559 Macur et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200392341 Smith et al. Dec 2020 A1
20210127601 Kaplan-Bie et al. May 2021 A9
20210317433 Schaak Oct 2021 A9
20210348117 Winiski Nov 2021 A9
20210401019 Bayer et al. Dec 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (59)
Number Date Country
1059662 Mar 1992 CN
1732887 Feb 2006 CN
101248869 Aug 2008 CN
101653081 Feb 2010 CN
106947702 Jul 2017 CN
0226292 Jun 1987 EP
1312547 May 2003 EP
2677030 Dec 2013 EP
2735318 May 2014 EP
2875805 May 2015 EP
2878340 Jun 2015 EP
2485779 Feb 2018 EP
3292769 Mar 2018 EP
142800 Jan 1921 GB
1525484 Sep 1978 GB
2032456 May 1980 GB
2165865 Apr 1986 GB
358266 Jul 2020 IN
H03234889 Oct 1991 JP
H049316 Jan 1992 JP
6111510 Apr 2017 JP
20050001175 Jan 2005 KR
101851655 Apr 2018 KR
WO 1999024555 May 1999 WO
WO 2001087045 Nov 2001 WO
WO 2005067977 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2008025122 Mar 2008 WO
WO 2008073489 Jun 2008 WO
WO 2010005476 Jan 2010 WO
WO 2012122092 Sep 2012 WO
WO 2014039938 Mar 2014 WO
WO 2014195641 Dec 2014 WO
WO 2016149002 Sep 2016 WO
WO 2017056059 Apr 2017 WO
WO 2017120342 Jul 2017 WO
WO 2017136950 Aug 2017 WO
WO 2017151684 Sep 2017 WO
WO 2017205750 Nov 2017 WO
WO 2018011805 Jan 2018 WO
WO 2018014004 Jan 2018 WO
WO 2018064968 Apr 2018 WO
WO 2018183735 Oct 2018 WO
WO 2018189738 Oct 2018 WO
WO 2019046480 Mar 2019 WO
WO 2019099474 May 2019 WO
WO 2019178406 Sep 2019 WO
WO 2019217175 Nov 2019 WO
WO 2019226823 Nov 2019 WO
WO 2019246636 Dec 2019 WO
WO 2020023450 Jan 2020 WO
WO 2020072140 Apr 2020 WO
WO 2020082043 Apr 2020 WO
WO 2020082044 Apr 2020 WO
WO 2020102552 May 2020 WO
WO 2020106743 May 2020 WO
WO 2020176758 Sep 2020 WO
WO 2020186068 Sep 2020 WO
WO 2020186169 Sep 2020 WO
WO 2020237201 Nov 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (178)
Entry
Nathan J. Kotlarewski; Benoit Belleville; Benson K. Gusamo; Barbara Ozarska. “Mechanical properties of Papua New Guinea balsa wood”. Eur. J. Wood Prod. (2016) 74:83-89 (Year: 2016).
Nathan J. Kotlarewski; Benoit Belleville; Benson K. Gusamo; Barbara Ozarska. Mechanical properties of Papua New Guinea balsa wood.Eur. J. Wood Prod. (2016) 74:83-89. DOI 10.1007/s00107-015-0983-0 (Year: 2016).
G Newaz; M Mayeed; A Rasul. Characterization of balsa wood mechanical properties required for continuum damage mechanics analysis. J Materials: Design and Applications 2016, vol. 230(1) 206-218. (Year: 2016).
D. W. Green; J. E. Winandy; D. E. Kretschmann. “Mechanical Properties of Wood”. Forest Products Laboratory. 1999. Wood handbook—Wood as an engineering material. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-113. Madison, WI: U.S.D.A. Accessed at https://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr113/ch04.pdf on Jul. 20, 2021. (Year: 1999).
www.timberpress.com/blog/2017/01/how-do-mushrooms-grow-so-quickly/.
Bartnicki-Garcia, “Cell wall chemistry, morphogenesis, and taxonomy of fungi”, Annual Review Microbiol. (1968) 22(1): 87-108.
Cha et al., “Biomimetic synthesis of ordered silica structures mediated by block copolypeptides”. Nature (2000) 403(6767): 289-292.
Dugdale J. “This new surf company is making boards of mushrooms”. Blog post—Jun. 25, 2015.
Halseide P., “Cutting brick the safe way”. The Aberdeen Group (1988) Publication #M880354 in 2 pages.
Highland Woodworking, “Making Thin Lumber and Veneer Out of Ordinary Boards”, Sales Website (2017) in 3 pages.
Holt et al., “Biobased Composition Boards Made from Cotton Gin and Guayule Wastes: Select Physical and Mechanical Properties”, Int J Mater Prod Tech. (2009) 36: 104-114.
Islam et al., “Morphology and mechanics of fungal mycelium”, Scientific Reports, (2017) 7(1): 1-12.
Kerem et al., “Chemically defined solid-state fermentation of Pleurotus Ostreatus”. Enzyme Microbiol Tech. (1993) 15(9): 785-790.
Kokubo et al., “Ca,P-rich layer formed on high-strength bioactive glass-ceramic A-W”. J Biomed Mater Res. (1990) 24(3): 331-343.
Koutsoukos et al., “Precipitation of calcium carbonate in aqueous solutions”. J Chem Soc., Faraday Trans. 1, Physical Chemistry in Condensed Phases, (1984) 80(5): 1181-1192.
Lu et al., “Theoretical Analysis of Calcium Phosphate precipitation in simulated Body Fluid”. Biomaterials (2005) 26(10): 1097-1108—Pre-Pub. Version by Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kowloon; 34 pages.
Molvinger et al., “Porous chitosan-silica hybrid microspheres as a potential catalyst”. Chem Mater. (2004) 16(17): 3367-3372.
Monmaturapoj et al., “Influence of preparation method on hydroxyapatite porous scaffolds”. Bull Mater Sci. (2011) 34(7): 1733-1737.
Manoli et al., “Crystallization of calcite on chitin”. J Cryst Growth, (1997) 182(1-2): 116-124.
Mushroom Source, “Aspen Wood Shavings for Mushroom Cultivation”, Website (2015) in 2 pages.
National Institute of Health (NIH/NIBIB), “Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine”, Retrieved Sep. 24, 2018 from https://www.nibib.nih.gov/science-education/science-topics/tissue-engineering-and-regenerative-medicine in 13 pages.
Passauer U. et al., “Pilze in Höhlen” [Cave Mushrooms]. Denisia (2016) 37: 211-224.
Stewart B., “Concrete Fence Posts: Fact Sheet”, Texas Agriculture Extension Service, Texas A & M University (1975) Article L-1368 in 4 pages.
Trinci et al., “II. Unrestricted Growth of Fungal Mycelia”, The Mycota—Growth, Differenciation and Sexuality by Wessels et al. [Eds], Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, (1994) Chapter II: 175-193.
Udawatte et al., “Solidification of xonotlite fibers with chitosan by hydrothermal hot pressing”. J Mater Sci. Lttrs. (2000) 45(6): 298-301.
University of Sydney, “Competition Between Fungi”. Webpage, accessed Jul. 16, 2014—http://bugs.bio.usyd.edu.au/learning/resources/Mycology/Ecology/competition.shtml in 3 pages.
Varma et al., “Porous calcium phosphate coating over phosphorylated chitosan film by a biomimetic method”. Biomaterials (1999) 20(9): 879-884.
Wagner A. “Mycelium Biking—Eco-Design at its Best”, Master's Thesis at Lulea University of Technology (2016) in 92 pages.
Woller R. “The Pearl Oyster Mushroom”, University of Wisconsin Website (2011) in 2 pages.
Wan-Mohtar et al., “The morphology of Ganoderma lucidum mycelium in a repeated-batch fermentation for exopolysaccharide production”, Biotechnology Reports (2016) 11:2-11.
Weaver et al., “The stomatopod dactyl club: a formidable damage-tolerant biological hammer”. Science (2012) 336(6086): 1275-1280.
Yamasaki et al., “A hydrothermal hot-pressing method: Apparatus and Application”. J Mater Sci Lttrs. (1986) 5(3): 355-356.
Zivanovic et al., “Changes in Mushroom Texture and Cell Wall Composition Affected by Thermal Processing”. J Food Service (2004) 69: 44-49.
Agnese et al., “Investigating the Influence of Various Plasticizers on the Properties of Isolated Films of Polyvinyl Acetat”. The 37th Annual meeting and Exposition of the Controlled Release Society, Jul. 2010, Portland, OR U.S.A.
Amsellem et al., “Long-term preservation of viable mycelia of two mycoherbicidal organisms”. Crop Protection (1999) 18: 643-649.
Angelini et al., “Effect of antimicrobial activity of Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil on antagonistic potential of Pleurotus species against Trichoderma harzianum in dual culture.” World J Microbiol Biotech. (2008) 24(2): 197-202.
Ashiuchi et al., “Isolation of Bacillus subtilis (chungkookjang), a poly-gamma-glutamate producer with high genetic competence”. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. (2011) 57: 764-769.
Bajaj et al., “Poly (glutamic acid)—An emerging biopolymer of commercial interest”. Bioresource Tech. (2011) 102(10): 5551-5561.
Baysal et al., “Cultivation of oyster mushroom on waste paper with some added supplementary materials”. Biosource Technology (2003) 89: 95-97.
Begum et al., “Bioconversion and saccharification of some lignocellulosic wastes by Aspergillus oryzae ITCC-4857.01 for fermentable sugar production”. Elect J Biotech. (2011) (14)5: 3 in 8 pages.
Binder et al., “Phylogenetic and phylogenomic overview of the Polyporales”. Mycologia (Nov.-Dec. 2013) 105(6): 1350-1373.
Blanchette et al., “Fungal mycelial mats used as textile by indigenous people of North America”, Mycologia (Feb. 20, 2021) pp. 1-7.
Booth et al., “Potential of a dried mycelium formulation of an indigenous strain of Metarhizium anisopliae against subterranean pests of cranberry.” Biocontrol Science and Technology (2000) 10: 659-668.
Bowman et al., “The structure and synthesis of the fungal cell wall”. Bioassays (2006) 28(8): 799-808.
Chai et al., “β-Glucan Synthase Gene Overexpression and β-Glucans Overproduction in Pleurotus ostreatus Using Promoter Swapping”. PLoS ONE (2013) 8(4): e61693 in 7 pages.
Chaudhary et al., “Understanding rice hull ash as fillers in polymers: a review”. Silicon Chemistry (2002) 1:281-289.
Collins English Dictionary, “Mould”, retrieved from http://collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/mould, downloaded on Jul. 13, 2015.
Dias et al., “Synthesis and characterization of chitosan-polyvinyl alcohol-bioactive glass hybrid membranes”. Biomatter (2011) 1(1): 114-119.
Elleuche et. al., “Carbonic anhydrases in fungi”. Microbiology (2010) 156: 23-29.
Elsacker et al., “Growing living and multifunctional mycelium composites for large-scale formwork applications using robotic abrasive wire-cutting”, Construction Bldg Mater. (2021) 283: 122732 in 16 pages.
Fleet G.H., “Cell walls”. in The Yeasts, by Rose et al. [Eds.] 2nd Edition. vol. 4. London: Academic Press. (1991) pp. 199-277.
Frandsen R.J.N., “A guide to binary vectors and strategies for targeted genome modification in fungi using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation”. J Microbiol Methods (2011) 87: 247-262.
Gardening KnowHow, Perlite Soil Info: Learn About Perlite Potting Soil, online at www.gardeningknowhow.com/garden-how-to/soil-fertilizers/perlite-potting-soil.htm downloaded on Dec. 16, 2015., 3 pages.
Goodell et al., “Fungal Decay of Wood: Soft Rot-Brown Rot-white Rot”. In Development of Commercial Wood Preservatives; Schultz et al. [Ed.] ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. (2008), Chapter 2, pp. 9-31.
Google Report, Complete colonization substrate mushroom (2 pages) Jan. 30, 2018., 2 pages.
Google Dictionary Definition “Composite”, downloaded on Nov. 21, 2018; 1 page.
Gourmet Mushroom, Inc., “What is Mushroom?”—Mushroom Facts Mushroom Information—Educational & Science Projects (2004). Downloaded from www.gmushrooms.com, on Nov. 27, 2017; 5 pages.
Heinzkill et al., “Characterization of laccases and peroxidases from wood-rotting fungi (family Coprinaceae).” Appl Environ Microbiol. (1998) 64: 1601-1606.
Horton et al., “Regulation of Dikaryon-Expressed Genes by FRT1 in the Basidiomycete Schizophyllum commune”. Fungal Genet Biol. (1999) 26(1): 33-47.
Hyde et al., “The amazing potential of fungi: 50 ways we can exploit fungi industrially”. Fungal Diversity (2019) 97(1): 1-136.
Kamzolkina et al., “Micromorphological features of Pleurotus pulmonarius (Fr.) Quel. and P. ostreaturs (Jacq.) P. Kumm. Strains in pure and binary culture with yeasts”. Tsitologiia (2006) 48(2): 153-160.
Kerem et al., “Effect of Mananese on Lignin Degradation by Pleurotus ostreatus during Solid-State Fermentation”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology (1993) 59(12): 4115-4120.
Kilaru et al., “Investigating dominant selection markers for Coprinopsis cinerea: a carboxin resistance system and re-evaluation of hygromycin and phleomycin resistance vectors”. Curr Genet. (2009) 55: 543-550.
Kück et al., “New tools for the genetic manipulation of filamentous fungi”. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. (2010) 86: 51-62.
Kuo, 2005-2006. Glossary of Mycological Terms. Mushroom Expert. Com., pp. 1-13; downloaded from http://www.mushroomexpert.com/glossary.html (May 8, 2015).
Li et al., “Preparation and Characterization of Homogeneous Hydroxyapatite/Chitosan Composite Scaffolds via In-Situ Hydration”. J Biomaterials Nanobiotech. (2010) 1: 42-49.
Luo et al., “Coprinus comatus: a basidiomycete fungus forms novel spiny structures and infects nematode.” Mycologia (2004) 96(6): 1218-1225.
Mushroom Growers' Handbook 1, “Oyster Mushroom Cultivation”. Part II, Chapter 5, (2005) pp. 75-85.
Mushroom Growers' Handbook 2, “Shiitake Bag Cultivation”, Part I Shiitake. Published by Mush World (2005) Chapter 4, pp. 73-90 and pp. 105-109.
Norvell L., Fungi Biology. Encyclopedia.(2002); 2 pages.
Novoselova et al., “Cocultivation of Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq.) P. Kumm, with yeasts”. Moscow University Biol Sciences Bulletin (2011) 66(3): 102-105.
Peng et al., “Microbial biodegradation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons”. FEMS Microbiol Rev. (2008) 32:927-955.
Perez et al., “Myxococcus xanthus induces actinorhodin overproduction and aerial mycelium formation by Streptomyces coelicolor.” Microbial Biotech. (2011) 4(2): 175-183.
Philippoussis et al., “Production of Mushrooms Using Agro-Industrial Residues as Substrates”, in Biotechnology for Agro-Industrial Residues, Chapter 9, (2009) pp. 163-187.
Poppe J., Mushroom Growers' Handbook 1, 2004, Part II. Chapter 5, “Substrate”, pp. 80-81.
Pompei et al., “The Use of Olive Milling Waste-Water for the Culture of Mushrooms on Perlite”. Acta Horticulturae (1994) 361:179-185.
Rai et al., “Production of Edible Fungi”, in Fungal Biotechnology in Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Applications, D.K. Arora [Ed.], Marcel Dekker, Inc., (2003), Chapter 21, pp. 383-404.
Royse et al., “Influence of substrate wood-chip particle size on shiitake (Lentinula edodes) yield”. Bioresource Tehnology (2001) 76(3): 229-233.
Sapak et al., “Effect of endophytic bacteria on growth and suppression of Tganoderma infection in oil palm”. Int J Agric Biol. (2008) 10(2): 127-132.
Schirp et al., “Production and characterization of natural fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites using wheat straw modified with the fungus Pleurotus ostreatus”. J Appl. Polym Sci. (2006) 102:5191-5201.
Scholtmeijer et al., “Effect of introns and AT-rich sequences on expression of the bacterial hygromycin B resistance gene in the basidiomycete Schizophyllum commune”. Appl Environ Microbiol. (2001) 67(1): 481-483.
Science Daily, May 7, 2007, retrieved from the Internet; http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070506085628.htm., 3 pages.
Sinotech et al., (2015): retrieved from the Internet http://www.sinotech.com/compressionAndTransferMolding.html., 4 pages.
Slater, M. “Young SoRo Entrepreneur Develops Environmentally Friendly Insulation.” The Herald of Randolph. Jun. 21, 2007, pp. 1-2.
Staib et al., “Differential expression of the NRG1 repressor controls species-specific regulation of chlamydospore development in Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis.” Molecular Microbiol. (2005) 55(2): 637-652.
Stamets P., “Mycelium Running”. Ten Speed Press (2005); pp. 18, 56, 58, 59, 85, 149, 157, 160 and 291 only.
Sundari et al., “Freeze-drying vegetative mycelium of Laccaria fraterna and its subsequent regeneration”. Biotechnology Techniques (1999) 13:491-495.
Tartar et al., “Differential expression of chitin synthase (CHS) and glucan synthase (FKS) genes correlates with the formation of a modified, thinner cell wall in in vivo-produced Beauveria bassiana cells.” Mycopathologia (2005) 160(4): 303-314.
Téllez-Jurado et al., “Expression of a heterologous laccase by Aspergillus niger cultured by solid-state and submerged fermentations.” Enzyme Microbial Tech. (2006) 38(5): 665-669.
Téllez-Téllez et al., “Growth and laccase production by Pleurotus ostreatus in submerged and solid-state fermentation.” Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. (2008) 81(4): 675-679.
Ugalde U., “Autoregulatory Signals in Mycelial Fungi” in The Mycota: A Comprehensive Treatise on Fungi as Experimental Systems for Basic and Applied Research. K. Esser [Ed.] Springer Publisher, 2nd Edition (2006) Chapter 11; pp. 203-213.
Universal Oil Field, “Sawdust”, downloaded from universaloilfield.org on Aug. 23, 2018, 4 pages.
Vara et al., “Cloning and expression of a puromycin N-acetyl transferase gene from Streptomyces alboniger in Streptomyces lividans and Escherichia coli”. Gene (1985) 33(22): 197-206.
Visser et al., “Pseudoxylaria as stowaway of the fungus-growing termite nest: Interaction asymmetry between Pseudoxylaria, Termitomyces and free-living relatives”. Fungal Ecology (2011)4(5): 322-332.
Volk (2003) “Tom Volk's Fungus of the Month for Oct. 1998”. This month's fungus is Pleurotus ostreatus; the Oyster mushroom, pp. 1-4, downloaded from http://botit.botany.wise.edu/toms_fungi/oct98.html on May 8, 2015.
Wang et al., “Influence of fungal elicitors on biosynthesis of natamycin by Streptomyces natalensis HW-2”. Appl Microbiol Biothechnol. (2003) 97: 5527-5534.
Wikipedia, “Wood”, downloaded on Nov. 26, 2018, 1 page.
Yang et al., “Medicinal Mushroom Ganoderma lucidum as a Potent Elicitor in Production of t-Resveratrol and t-Peceatannol in Peanut Calluses”. J Agric Food Chem. (2010) 58(17): 9518-9522.
Zimin et al., “The MaSuRCA genome assembler”. Bioinformatics (2013) 29(21): 2669-2677.
Grant, James. J.—“An investigation of the airflow in mushroom growing structures, the development of an improved, three-dimensional solution technique for fluid flow and its evaluation for the modelling of mushroom growing structures”, Doctoral Thesis Sep. 2002; 326 pages.
PhpBB Shopsmith Forums, “Cracks in wide paneling boards”, Excerpt from Oct. 28, 2017, downloaded from URL <https://www.shopsmith.com/ss_forum/viewtopic.php?p=214601 >; 2 pages.
Antón et al., “PimM, a PAS Domain Positive Regulator of Pimaricin Biosynthesis in Streptomyces natalensis.” Microbiol. (2007) 153: 3174-3183.
Appels et al., “Hydrophobin gene deletion and environmental growth conditions impact mechanical properties of mycelium by affecting the density of the material.” Scientific Reports (2018)8(1): 1-7.
Arshad et al., “Tissue engineering approaches to develop cultured meat from cells: a mini review.” Cogent Food & Agriculture (2017) 3(1): 1320814 in 11 pages.
Belardinelli et al., “Actions of Adenosine and Isoproterenol on Isolated Mammalian Ventricular Myocytes.” Circulation Res. (1983) 53(3): 287-297.
Belay et al., “Preparation and Characterization of Graphene-agar and Graphene Oxide-agar Composites.” JOAPS (2017) 134(33): 45085.
Bormann et al., “Characterization of a Novel, Antifungal, Chitin-binding Protein from Streptomyces Tendae Tü901 that Interferes with Growth Polarity.” J Bacter. (1999) 181(24): 7421-7429.
Bru{hacek over (z)}auskaite et al., “Scaffolds and Cells for Tissue Regernation: Different Scaffold Pore Sizes—Different Cell Effects.” Cytotechnology (2016) 68(3): 355-369.
Byrd, “Clean meat's path to your dinner plate”, The Good Food Institute, website accessed Nov. 14, 2018, https://www.gfi.org/clean-meats-path-to-commercialization; 11 pages.
Cerimi et al., “Fungi as source for new bio-based materials: a patent review”, Fungal Biol Biotechnol. (2019) 6: 17; 10 pgs.
Chi et al., “Can Co-culturing of Two White-rot Fungi Increase Lignin Degradation and the Production of Lignin-degrading Enzymes?” Inter'l Biodeter Biodegrad. (2007) 59(1): 32-39.
Glowacki et al., “Bioconjugation of Hydrogen-bonded Organic Semiconductors with Functional Proteins.” J Mate Chem. C (2015) 3(25): 6554-6564.
Greetham et al., “Pheotypic characterisation of Saccharomyces sensu stricto to Inhibitory Compounds Released During the Deconstruction of Lignocellulosic Material.” 3th International Congress on Yeasts, ICY 2012, Aug. 26-30, Madison, USA; 1 page.
Griffin et al., “Regulation of macromolecular synthesis, colony development and specific growth rate of Achlya bisexualis during balanced growth”. J General Microbiol. (1974) 80(2): 381-388.
Growers Supply. “Horticultural Coarse Perlite—4 Cubic Fee—Growers Supply”. URL: https://growerssupply.com; Growers Supply 2012; www.growerssupply.com/farm/supplies/prod1:gs_growing_mediums:pg111049.html; downloaded Dec. 14, 2020 in 3 pages.
Haneef et al., “Advanced Materials from Fungal Mycelium: Fabrication and Tuning of Physical Properties”, Scientific Reports 7(1): 1-11; DOI: 10.1038/srep41292, Jan. 24, 2017.
Heisig et al., USGS, “Ground-Water Resources of the Clifton Park Area, Saratoga County, New York”, 2002, retrieved from the internet (Oct. 15, 2016): http://ny.water.usgs.gov/pubs/wri/wri014104/wrir01-4104.pdf; 27 pages.
Home Depot “Miracle Gro® Perlite Mix”, retrieved from the internet: http://homedepot.com/p/Miracle-Gro-8-pt-Perlite-Mix-74278430/204502291; 2 pages.
Home Depot “Pennington—Fast Acting Gypsum”, retrieved from the internet: http://homedepot.com/p/Miracle-Gro-8-pt-Perlite-Mix-74278430/204502291; 2 pages.
Howden et al., “The effects of breathing 5% CO2 on human cardiovascular responses and tolerance to orthostatic stress”. Exper. Physiol. (2004) 89(4): 465-471.
Hüttner et al., “Recent advances in the intellectual property landscape of filamentous fungi”, Fungal Biol Biotechnol. (2020) 7:16; 17 pgs.
Instructables, How to Grow Oyster Mushroom Spawn (Low Tech), retrieved from the internet Aug. 19, 2018: http://www.instructables.com/id/1-How-to-Grow-Oyster-Mushroom-Spawn-Low-Tech/; 17 pages.
Jones et al., “Leather-like material biofabrication using fungi”, Nature Sustainability (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00606-1, Sep. 7, 2020.
Kemppainen et al., “Transformation of the Mycorrhizal Fungus Laccaria Bicolor using Agrobacterium tumefaciens.” Bioengin Bugs (2011) 2(1): 38-44.
Kim et al., “Current Technologies and Related Issues for Mushroom Transformation.” Mycobiology (2015) 43(1): 1-8.
Kües, U., “Life History and Development Processes in the Basidiomycete Coprinus Cinereus.” Micro Molecular Biol Rev. (2000) 64(2): 316-353.
Kuhar et al., by Ingredi Potassium Sorbate vs Campden Tablets in Wine Making; Jun. 4, 2018. [online]; Retrieved from the Internet <URL: https://ingredi.com/blog/potassium-sorbate-vs-campden-tables-in-wine-making/>; 2 pages.
McPherson et al., “Dissolvable Antibiotic Beads in Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Revision Arthroplasty: The Use of Synthetic Pure Calcium Sulfate (Stimulan®) Impregnated with Vancomycin & Tobramycin.” Reconstructive Review (2013) 3(1) 12 pages.
Merriam-Webster, “Chamber” dictionary definition; https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary accessed Jul. 10, 2017; in 4 Pages.
Merriam-Webster, “pack” Thesaurus definition; https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus; synonyms accessed Aug. 19, 2019; in 10 Pages.
Michielse et al., “Agrobacterium-mediated Transformation of the Filamentous Fungus Aspergillus Awamori.” Nature Protocols (2008) 3(10): 1671-1678.
Mitchell et al., [Eds.] “Solid-State Fermentation Bioreactors.” Springer Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg (2006); TOC in 12 Pages.
Moore D., “Fungal Morphogenesis.” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; (1998) TOC in 8 Pages.
Moore D., “Tolerance of Imprecision in Fungal Morphogenesis.” In Proceedings of the 4th Meeting on the Genetics and Cellular Biology of Basidiomycetes (Mar. 1998) pp. 13-19.
Naknean et al., “Factors Affecting Retention and Release of Flavor Compounds in Food Carbohydrates.” Inter'l Food Res J. (2010) 17(1): 23-34.
Nussinovitch “Polymer Macro-and Micro-Gel Beads: Fundamentals and Applications”, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-6618_2, Springer Science & Business Media LLC (2010) TOC in 8 Pages.
Paz et al., “One Step Contruction of Agrobacterium-Recombination-ready-plasmids (OSCAR): An Efficient and Robust Tool for ATMT Based Gene Deletion Construction in Fungi.” Fungal Gen Biol. (2011) 48(7): 677-684.
Peksen et al., “Favourable Culture Conditions for mycelial growth of Hydnum repandum, a medicinal mushroom.” African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines (2013) 10(6): 431-434.
Pinterest Fungus Objects: Alaska and Canada; Collection by Deborah Tear Haynes, downloaded from URL <https://www.pinterest.com/deborahtear/fungi-textile-ketchikan-alaska/>; 1 page.
Ross, P., “Pure Culture” 1997-Present; URL: <http://billhoss.phpwebhosting.com/ross/index.php?kind>; downloaded Dec. 14, 2016 in 11 pages.
Schaner et al., “Decellularized Vein as a Potential Scaffold for Vascular Tissue Engineering.” J Vascular Surg. (2004) 40(1): 146-153.
Schuurman J., “Unique agar Pearls.” YouTube video; Feb. 16, 2012, <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GqTTOHETPQ>; 1 page.
Seamon K.B., “Forskolin: Unique Diterpene Activator of Adenylate Cyclase in Membranes and in Intact Cells.” PNAS (1981) 78(6): 3363-3367.
Stanev et al., “Open Cell Metallic Porous Materials Obtained Through Space Holders. Part I: Production Methods, A Review”. JMSE (2016) 139(5): 21 pages.
Stephens et al., “Bringing Cultured Meat to Market: Technical, Socio-political, and Regulatory Challenges in Cellular Agriculture.” Trends in Food Science & Technology (2018) 78: 155-166.
Wikipedia, “Water gel (plain)”, Wikipedia Contributors downloaded Aug. 21, 2017 in 1 Page.
Xiao et al., “A Water-soluble Core Material for Manufacturing Hollow Composite Sections.” Comp. Structures (2017) 182: 380-390.
Zadrazil et al., “Influence of CO2 Concentration on the Mycelium Growth of Three Pleurotus Species”, European J. Appl. Microbiol., vol. 1, pp. 327-335 (1975).
Abbadi et al., “Immunocytochemical identification and localization of lipase in cells of the mycelium of Penicillium cyclopium variety”, Applied Microbial Cell Physiology (1995) 42: 923-930.
Ando et al., “Cosmetic material for skin whitening—contains mushroom mycelium cultured matter and e.g. ginseng extract, chondroitin sodium sulphate and/or hyaluronic acid”, WPI/THOMSON (Jan. 14, 1992), 1992(8): Accession #1992-062018; Abstract of JP4009316A; in 9 pages.
Attias et al., “Biofabrication of Nanocellulose-Mycelium Hybrid Materials”, Adv Sustainable Syst. (2020) 5(2): 2000196 in 12 pages; Supporting Information in 7 pages.
Borrás et al., “Trametes versicolor pellets production: Low-cost medium and scale-up”, Biochem Eng J. (2008) 42(1): 61-66.
Holt et al. “Fungal mycelium and cotton plant materials in the manufacture of biodegradable molded packaging material: Evaluation study of select blends of cotton byproducts.” J Biobased Mater Bioenergy (2012) 6(4): 431-439.
Jiang et al., “Manufacturing of Natural Composites with a Mycelium Binder and Vacuum-infused Vegetable Oil-based Resins”, Poster dated May 2014; 1 page.
Jiang et al., “Vacuum Infusion of Mycelium-Bound Biocomposite Preforms with Natural Resins”, CAMX ExpoConference Proceedings, Oct. 13-16, 2014, 13 pages.
Jones et al., “Mycelim Composites: A Review of Engineering Characteristics and Growth Kinetics”, J Bionanoscience (2017) 11 (4): 241-257.
Jones et al., “Waste-derived Low-cost Mycelium Composite Construction Materials with Improved Fire Safety”, FAM (Fire and Materials) (2018) 42(7): 816-825.
Kuhn et al., [Eds.] Cell Walls and Membranes in Fungi—An Introduction (Abstract) in Biochemistry of Cell Walls and Membranes in Fungi, Chapter 1, Springer Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 1990, 2 pages.
Pathway-27, “Beta-glucan”, Aug. 2012, retrieved from http://http://www.pathway27.eu/topstory/beta-glucan/on Oct. 7, 2021 in 2 pages.
Stamets P., “Growing Gourmet and Medicinal Mushrooms”, (1993) Chapter 21; p. 363.
Thomas et al., “Growing Orchids in Perlite”. In Perlite Plant Guide, The Schundler Company 1951, pp. 1-6, downloaded from http://www.schundler.com/index.html, archived on May 11, 2015.
Vetchinkina et al., “Bioreduction of Gold (III) Ions from Hydrogen Tetrachloaurate . . . ” Scientific Practical J Health Life Sciences No. 4, ISSN 22188-2268, (2013) pp. 51-56.
Wösten et al., “How a fungus escapes the water to grow into the air”, Current Biology. (1999) 9(2): 85-88.
Zeng Z., “Cosmetic composition for cleaning skin, comprises glossy ganoderma spores and collagens, content of glossy ganoderma spores in composition and content of collagens in composition”, WPI/Thomson (Feb. 5, 2006) 7: Accession #2007-057767; Abstract of CN1732887A; in 11 pages.
Ziegler et al., “Evaluation of Physico-mechanical Properties of Mycelium Reinforced Green Biocomposites Made from Cellulosic Fibers”, Appl Engin Agricult. (2016) 32(6): 931-938.
Antinori et al., “Advanced mycelium materials as potential self-growing biomedical scaffolds.” Scientific reports (2021) 11(1): 1-14.
Hidayat et al., “Characterization of polylactic acid (PLA)/kenaf composite degradation by immobilized mycelia of Pleurotus ostreatus”. Inter Biodeter Biodegrad. (2012) 71: 50-54.
Jiang et al., “Bioresin Infused then Cured Mycelium-based Sandwich-structure Biocomposites: Resin Transfer Molding (RTM) Process, Flexural Properties, and Simulation.” J Cleaner Production (2019) 207: 123-135.
Jones et al., Chitin-chitosan Thin Films from Microbiologically Upcycled Agricultural By-products. In 13th International Conference on the Mechanical Behavious of Materials, Melbourne, Australia (Jun. 2019) p. 66; in 7 pages.
Meyer et al., “Comparison of the Technical Performance of Leather, Artificial Leather, and Trendy Alternatives.” Coatings (Feb. 2021) 11(2): 226; 14 pages.
Wösten et al., “Growing Fungi Structures in Space”, ACT Research Category/Space Architecture; Noordwijk, The Netherlands (Oct. 15, 2018) in 17 pages.
Collins English Dictionary, “Cavity”, Definition; retrieved on Nov. 8, 2021; 1 page.
Merriam-Webster, “desiccated” (Adj.) Definition; downloaded on Nov. 8, 2021; 1 page.
Wang et al., “Chemical and structural factors influencing enzymatic saccharification of wood from aspen, birch and spruce”. Biomass Bioengin. (2018) 109: 125-134.
Bandalan et al., “Inhibitory effect of garlic (Allium sativum L.) against bread mold and its influence on the quality of yeast-leavened bread”, Int J Food Engineer. (Dec. 2018) 4(4): 256-262.
Kumla et al., “Cultivation of Mushrooms and Their Lignocellulolytic Enzyme Production Through the Utilization of Agro-Industrial Waste”. Molecules Jun. 2020;25(12): 2811 in 41 pages.
Voronin et al., “Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope Composition of the Wood of Pinus sylvestris, Betula pendula and Populus tremula”. Paleonotal J., Dec. 2020;54(8): 819-824.
Williams, J. “Waste not: Will the furniture of the future be made from leftovers?”, Financial Times Jan. 11, 2019 (Mogu—Radical by Nature); in 9 page.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170028600 A1 Feb 2017 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61890433 Oct 2013 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14510912 Oct 2014 US
Child 15258685 US