Method of manufacturing cement raw mix

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The field of the invention is the manufacture of cement, more particularly the field is the mixing of raw materials to produce a cement raw mix for feeding into a kiln.
2. Brief Description of the Prior Art
In the cement making process, limestone is mixed with other materials to form a cement raw mix. Typical materials that may be mixed with the limestone to form the raw mix are diaspore (source of aluminum oxide), tripoli (source of silica oxide), and fly ash (source of iron oxide). The raw mix produced is then fed into a kiln where it undergoes a calcination process.
The characteristics of the final product are determined by (1) chemical composition of the raw mix, (2) conditions in the kiln, and (3) the extent of the exposure of the raw mix in the kiln during the calcination process. Further, the extent to which the raw mix is to be exposed in the kiln will vary depending upon the actual composition of the raw mix. In producing a quality cement, the raw mix should ideally have a constant homogenous composition with a small standard of deviation.
However, it is difficult to produce a constant homogeneous mix because the raw materials, particularly the limestone, are susceptible to variations in the chemical composition as they are fed into the raw mix. For example, the composition of the limestone may vary over time because of: (a) variations in the extent of overburden mixed with the limestone; (b) variations within the chemical composition within the rock itself; and (c) changes in the moisture content in the stone.
Other problems encountered in maintaining a uniform composition in the raw mix involve the extremely large quantities of raw material being mixed and the possibility of weighfeeder malfunctions. Because of the extremely large quantities involved, direct analysis of the stone may not even accurately represent the composition of the stone at any one given point in time, much less accurately represent the composition over any extended period. When a weighfeeder malfunction goes undetected, the raw materials may be mixed in entirely different ratios from those intended.
In the past, it has been a common practice for a "mix analyst" to periodically test the raw mix composition. After testing the raw mix composition, the mix analyst then compares the actual composition with the desired composition of the raw mix to be fed into the kiln. Based upon this comparison, the mix analyst adjusts the relative proportions of the raw materials being supplied to the raw mix to compensate for deficiencies in any particular necessary raw material. For instance, after checking the chemical composition of the raw mix at a given time, the analyst may determine that the composition is low in silica oxide. To compensate for this deficiency, the analyst then approximates how much more sand is needed to eliminate the silica oxide deficiency, and adds proportionately more sand over the next time interval. At the end of the next time interval, he agains checks the raw mix composition to determine whether any further correction need to be made. This process has inherent limitations in that is is dependent upon the intuition and experience of the mix analyst and it is not directly responsive to changes in the actual composition of the raw materials. And while the general process can produce satisfactory results where the raw mix is batch mixed or where the raw materials are of unusually uniform composition, it is unsuitable for the newer large capacity plants which utilize a constant kiln feed with reduced retention time in the kiln because of pre-calcination. In these newer plants, composition uniformity is a greater factor as variations in the composition more substantially affect the quality of the final product.
Various automated processes have been developed which compare the actual compositions of the raw mix with a target composition, and adjust the proportions of the raw materials being mixed to compensate for deviations from the target composition. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,233,073 to L. E. Veo et al.; 3,835,873 to Wildpaner; and 3,602,488 to Romig. The automated systems which have been developed, however, do not provide for the periodic indirect adjustment of the estimated chemical compositions of the raw materials being mixed; their initiation procedures include direct analysis of the limestone; and the systems do not incorporate weighfeeder malfunction detection in the automated material proportioning aspect of their process.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a process for the production of cement raw mix which takes into account variations which may occur in the raw materials being introduced into the raw mix, particularly such variations which occur in the limestone. Certain embodiments of the invention include the periodic adjustment in the estimated chemical composition of the raw materials used to produce the raw mix in response to the degree of divergence between the actual proportions (W.sub.i) of the raw materials mixed and the "theoretical" proportions (T.sub.i) which theoretically would have generated the raw mix that was produced over the previous time interval. Based upon the revised estimated chemical compositions, the desired characteristics of the raw mix over the next specific subsequent interval are reselected to adjust the overall chemical composition of the raw mix towards the overall desired characteristics, while maintaining continuity in the raw mix being produced and avoiding undersirable fluctuations in the composition. Briefly described, one embodiment of the present invention includes the steps of:
(1) estimating the chemical composition of the limestone and the several other materials which are to produce the raw mix;
(2) selecting the desired characteristics of the overall raw mix composition;
(3) determining the relative proportions (W.sub.i) of the raw material to produce the raw mix of the desired characteristics;
(4) producing raw mix for a time interval by mixing the materials in the determined relative proportions (W.sub.i);
(5) after producing the raw mix for a time interval, directly analyzing the chemical composition of the raw mix and calculating the actual characteristics of the raw mix produced;
(6) determining the theoretical relative proportions (T.sub.i) of the raw materials that would have theoretically produced the actual characteristics of the raw mix;
(7) adjusting the estimated chemical compositions of the limestone and several other raw materials by adjusting estimated components of the raw materials in response to the degree of divergence between the theoretical relative proportions (T.sub.i) and the actual relative proportions (W.sub.i) of the raw materials mixed; and
(8) based upon the revised estimated chemical compositions of the limestone and several other raw materials, determining relative proportions (W.sub.i) of the raw materials to produce raw mix having desired characteristics over the next subsequent interval.
Certain further embodiments provide for indirect analysis of the chemical compositions of the limestone at the initiation of the mixing process by "backtracking" into the limestone, and provide for the detection of weighfeeder malfunctions as a part of the periodic chemical composition adjustment process.
Another aspect of the production of a quality cement product is the adjustment of the desired characteristics of the raw mix between subsequent time intervals to compensate toward the overall desired characteristics in the mix. While correction toward the overall desired characteristics is, of course, desirable, both overcorrection and undercorrection are to be avoided. The correction must be sufficient to compensate for deficiencies in the raw mix already produced. On the other hand, a certain extent of continuity should be maintained as rapid fluctuations in composition will affect the quality of the product. In the newer, larger capacity cement plants, which utilize constant kiln feed and precalcination, fluctuations in the mix significantly affect the quality of the product. The present invention also relates to this adjustment of subsequent target compositions to correct toward the overall desired characteristics in the mix, while maintaining continuity in the chemical compositions of the raw mix being produced.
Wherefore, it is an object of the present invention to produce cement raw mix having desired, uniform composition.
It is a further object of the present invention to produce such a cement raw mix without utilizing regular direct analysis of the raw materials, and particularly without direct analysis of the composition of the limestone.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a process for producing cement raw mix which indirectly takes into account variations in the chemical composition of the raw materials being used to produce the raw mix, and is also sensitive to faulty conditions in the weighfeeders which introduce the ram materials.
It is a further object of the present invention to selectively adjust the desired characteristics of the raw mix over specific subsequent intervals to correct the overall chemical composition of the raw mix towards the overall desired characteristics, while maintaining continuity in the composition of the raw mix being produced and avoiding undesirable fluctuations in the composition.
These and other objects and advantages of the present apparent from a reading of the following specification.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a block diagram schematically illustrating a process for the manufacture of cement raw mix.
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of the mixture of raw materials to produce a raw mix for feeding into a kiln to undergo the calcination process.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiment illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended, such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated device, and such further applications of the principles of the invention as illustrated therein being contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.
In the following specification of the preferred embodiment, reference will be made to the mixture of limestone with the raw materials diaspore, tripoli, and fly ash. While these materials are representative of a suitable mixture to produce a cement raw mix, it should be clearly understood that the principles of this same invention may also be applied to the mixture of limestone with other appropriate raw materials for manufacturing cement raw mix.
FIG. 2 generally illustrates the manner in which several raw materials are mixed to form a cement raw mix and then fed into a kiln. Storage bins 1, 2, 3, and 4 contain the raw materials limestone (source of calcium oxide, diaspore (source of alumina oxide), flyash (source of iron oxide), and tripoli (source of silica oxide) respectively. The introduction of these raw materials into roller mill 5 are controlled by weighfeeders 11, 12, 13, and 14. In roller mill 5, the raw materials are ground and blended. The blended mixture of raw materials is typically referred to as "raw mix". The raw mix is then stored in silo 6. Weighfeeder 15 controls the feed of raw mix into the kiln where the mix undergoes a calcination process. Also provided are sampling means 21, 22, and 23 for taking analysis samples of diaspore, flyash, and tripoli for the direct chemical analysis of these materials, and sampling means 24 for taking the direct chemical analysis of the blended raw mix.
The preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described. Before the manufacture of the cement raw mix is initiated, the diaspore, tripoli, and fly ash are directly analyzed to determine their chemical compositions. Limestone, however, is not readily susceptible to direct analysis that would be an accurate representation of the chemical composition of the stone. This is because of the variability of the chemical composition within the stone, variations in the amount of overburden mixed with the stone, changes in the moisture content in the stone, and the shear large quantities of the stone being mixed to produce the raw mix. Instead of directly analyzing the limestone, the chemical composition of the limestone is indirectly determined by "backtracking" into the stone at the initiation of the mixing process. This is done in the following manner:
The chemical compositions of diaspore, tripoli, and fly ash are directly analyzed. The following is an example of the results which might be obtained from this analysis:
TABLE I______________________________________Raw Material Analysis - Direct (Percent)Element Diaspore Tripoli Flyash______________________________________SiO.sub.2 43.783 80.97 39.17Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 32.156 1.84 17.27Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 2.904 1.635 34.29CaO 0.0 1.52 4.40MgO 0.322 0 0.56SO.sub.3 0.001 0 0.86K.sub.2 O 0.687 0.103 1.60H.sub.2 O 6.8 9.18 0.2LOI (loss of 13.2 4.9 1.24ignition)______________________________________
The raw materials are then mixed in relative proportions (P.sub.i) to form cement raw mix over a period of two hours. For instance, the following tonages of each raw material may be mixed within the two hour period:
TABLE II______________________________________Raw Materials Mixed______________________________________Limestone 416.27 tonsTripoli 34.97 tonsDiaspore .26 tonsFlyash 39.45 tons______________________________________
After the two hour period, the chemical composition of the raw mix is obtained by directly analyzing a sample of the raw mix. The results of such direct analysis may be as follows:
TABLE III______________________________________Raw Mix Composition (Percent)______________________________________ SiO.sub.2 14.984 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 3.041 CaO 1.374 MgO 2.43 SO.sub.3 .31 K.sub.2 O .178 H.sub.2 O -- LOI --______________________________________
This information is then used to "backtrack" into the limestone composition. For instance, the calcium oxide content of the limestone can be calculated by taking the total calcium oxide contained in the raw mix and subtracting from the amounts of calcium oxide contributed by each of the other raw materials. By then dividing this result by the total amount of limestone, the estimated calcium oxide content in the limestone is obtained. The same calculations are performed for the other elements contained in the limestone to obtain an overall indirect chemical composition analysis. From the above data, (Tables I, II, and III) the following indirect analysis of the limestone is obtained:
TABLE IV______________________________________Estimated Limestone Composition (Indirect) Element Stone______________________________________ SiO.sub.2 5.68 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.67 Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.0 CaO 49.1 MgO 3.01 SO.sub.3 .29 K.sub.2 O .03 H.sub.2 O 0.0 LOI 41.2______________________________________
Appendix A is a computer program which, based upon: (1) an initial direct analysis of the other raw materials, (2) mixed porportions of those raw materials with the limestone, and (3) direct analysis of the resulting raw mix, indirectly estimates the chemical composition of the limestone by "backtracking" into the stone as above described. The resulting indirect estimate of the chemical composition of the limestone provides an accurate representation of the content of the limestone that is being fed into the raw mix. Unlike direct analysis, the above described "backtracking" method takes into account variations which occur in the chemical content of the limestone over the course of time as the limestone is fed into the raw mix. Furthermore, the time and expense involved in taking direct analysis of the limestone is saved.
In the process of manufacturing cement raw mix, the specific desired chemical composition selected for any given raw mix will depend upon the particular desired characteristics in the cement final product. The chemical characteristics of the raw mix may be defined by various control moduli. The specific control moduli which are used in the preferred embodiment of the present invention are: (1) lime saturation factor (LSF); (2) silica ratio (SR); and (3) aluminum to iron ratio (AIR). These moduli are represented by the following formulas: ##EQU1##
By selecting a desired lime saturation factor (LSF.sub.D), a desired silica ratio (SR.sub.D), and a desired aluminum to iron ratio (AIR.sub.D), the parameters of the ideal raw mix can thus be defined. By these standards, or targets, the actual characteristics (LSF.sub.A, SR.sub.A, and AIR.sub.A) can be compared, and subsequent adjustments in proportions of raw materials mixed can be made so that the actual characteristics (LSF.sub.A, SR.sub.A, and AIR.sub.A) will more nearly approximate the target characteristics (LSF.sub.D, SR.sub.D, and AIR.sub.D).
In the preferred embodiment, the raw material proportioning adjustments are made on the basis of adjustments of estimated chemical compositions of the raw materials. Those adjustments are based upon the degree or extent of divergence between the actual relative proportions of the raw materials mixed, and theoretically would have produced the raw mix that actually was produced.
The following illustration shows the manner in which these adjustments are made according to the preferred embodiment. The following targets may be selected as desired characteristics in a raw mix to be produced:
TABLE V______________________________________Desired Raw Mix Characteristics______________________________________ LSF = 94.0 SR = 3.30 AIR = 1.65______________________________________
After the desired characteristics are selected, the relative proportions of the raw materials to be mixed to produce raw mix having those desired characteristics may be calculated. These relative proportions are represented by weighfeeder setpoints (W.sub.i) for each of the raw materials. The relative weighfeeder setpoints (W.sub.i) are calculated by simulatneously solving the following set of equations: ##EQU2## In the above equations, C represents calcium oxide, A represents aluminum oxide, S represents silica oxide, and F represents iron oxide. Accordingly, C.sub.i, A.sub.i, S.sub.i, and F.sub.i represent the presence of these components in each of the raw materials being mixed. The above equations can be readily solved by Gaussian reduction techniques for the weighfeeder setpoints (W.sub.i) for each of the raw materials to produce a cement raw mix having the desired characteristics (LSF.sub.D, SR.sub.D, and AIR.sub.D). Appendix B is a computer program which provides a specific example of computerized Gaussian reduction techniques to simultaneously solve the above equations for weighfeeder setpoints (W.sub.i).
Thus, given the desired raw mix characteristics in Table V, and the estimated raw material analysis of Table VI
TABLE VI______________________________________Raw Material Analysis (Percent)Element Stone Diaspore Tripoli Flyash______________________________________SiO.sub.2 5.07 43.78 77.51 45.03Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 1.23 32.16 2.80 18.36Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.31 2.90 0.81 18.57CaO 49.13 0.0 0 5.95MgO 1.84 0.32 0.18 0.42SO.sub.3 0.11 0.0 0.1 1.09K.sub.2 O 0.1 0.69 0.01 1.81H.sub.2 O 1.5 6.80 17.0 0LOI 41.0 13.20 1.81 8.77C.F. 0 0 0 0(correctionfactor)Totals 100.29 99.85 100.22 100.00______________________________________
the following equations are solved: ##EQU3## to generate the following realtive porportions of the raw materials, or weighfeeder setpoints (W.sub.i) to produce a raw mix of the desired characteristics.
Table VII______________________________________Raw Material Weighfeeder Setpoint (W.sub.i)______________________________________Limestone 80.8%Diaspore 2.4%Tripoli 10.3%Flyash 6.5%______________________________________
After producing raw mix by mixing raw materials in relative proportions (W.sub.i) over a period of time, for instance two hours, the chemical composition of the raw mix produced is directly analyzed and its actual characteristics (LSF.sub.A, SR.sub.A, and AIR.sub.A) are determined. The next step is to determine the "theoretical" weighfeeder setpoints (T.sub.i), i.e. the weighfeeder setpoints which, based upon the estimated chemical compositions of the raw materials, would theoretically have generated the analyzed chemical composition in the raw mix that actually was produced. These theoretical weighfeeder setpoints (T.sub.i) can be determined by simulataneously solving the following sets of equations: ##EQU4## The above equations are solvable through Gaussian reduction techniques in the same manner that the actual weighfeeder setpoints (W.sub.i) were previously determined. Thus, the raw mix having the following characteristic:
TABLE VIII______________________________________Raw Mix Charateristics______________________________________ LSF = 93.98 SR = 3.33 AIR = 1.61______________________________________
was generated by combining raw materials in the relative proportions given in Table VII.
The theoretical weighfeeder setpoints (T.sub.i) are next determined through Gaussian Reduction technique, as hereinabove described. Based upon the estimated raw material analysis of Table VI, the following equations were then solved for T.sub.i : ##EQU5## resulting in the following theoretical realtive proportions of the raw materials or theoretical weighfeeder set points:
TABLE IX______________________________________Raw Material Theoretical Weighfeeder Setpoints (T.sub.i)______________________________________Limestone 82.0%Diaspore 1.7%Tripoli 11.4%Flyash 4.8%______________________________________
These theoretical weighfeeder setpoints (T.sub.i) represent the relative proportions of raw materials which theoretically would have produced the raw mix that actually was produced, assuming the chemical analysis of Table VI to be accurate and assuming there to be no malfunction in the weighfeeder apparatus.
The next step is to adjust the estimated chemical compositions of the raw materials being mixed, based upon the degree of divergence between the above theoretical weighfeeder setpoints (T.sub.i) and the actual weighfeeder setpoints (W.sub.i) that were used in the previous time interval.
The estimated chemical compositions can be adjusted in response to the degree or extent of divergence between T.sub.i and W.sub.i by a variety of specific techniques. In the preferred technique, correction factors are calculated for each raw material by the following formula: ##EQU6## By applying this formula to the data from Tables VII and IX, the following correction factors result:
TABLE X______________________________________Correction Factors______________________________________ Limestone: -1.49 Diaspore: -10.67 Tripoli: 27.22 Flyash: 25.44______________________________________
The correction factors in Table X are used to indirectly correct the raw material analysis to compensate for changes occurring in the composition of the raw materials being introduced into the raw mix. This is achieved by including the correction factors as phantom components of the raw materials and then normalizing each raw material analysis to 1. The following table shows a new revised material analysis, adjusted from the data of Table VI by including the correction factors in Table X, and subsequent normalizing each raw material analysis to 1:
TABLE XI______________________________________Revised Raw Material Analysis (Percent)Element Stone Diaspore Tripoli Flyash______________________________________SiO.sub.2 5.13 49.1 60.82 35.9Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 1.24 36.1 2.2 14.6Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 .31 3.3 .64 14.8CaO 49.7 0 0 4.7MgO 1.86 .36 .14 .33SO.sub.3 .11 0 .08 .87K.sub.2 O .1 .78 .01 1.44H.sub.2 O 1.51 .76 13.3 0LOI 41.51 14..8 1.42 7.0C F -1.61 -12.0 21.36 20.3(correctionfactor)Totals 99.86 100.04 99.96 99.94______________________________________
Appendix B includes a computer program which adjusts estimated components and normalizes the adjusted analysis to produce a new revised chemical analysis of the raw material. In this manner the chemical compositions of the raw materials are regularly updated to account for variations without the need for regular direct analysis of the raw materials. This is particularly helpful in the estimation of the limestone which is not readily susceptible to accurate direct analysis and is also subject to wide variations in its chemical content during the raw mix manufacturing process. This process is also useful in detecting weighfeeder malfunctions.
As above mentioned, alternative techniques may be employed which also adjust the analyses of the materials in response to the degree of divergence between T.sub.i and W.sub.i. For instance, instead of including the correction factors in the subsequent normalization steps, normalization may be performed in a manner that excludes the correction factors. By this process, the components (excluding the phantom correction factor component) for each raw material are normalized to a number which is one plus the correction factor rather than being normalized to one with the correction factor included. Using the correction factors of Table X on the Analysis of Table VI, the following revised analysis is obtained.
TABLE XII______________________________________Revised Raw Material Analysis (Percent)Element Stone Diaspore Tripoli Flyash______________________________________SiO.sub.2 5.15 48.5 56.4 33.6Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 1.24 35.6 2.0 13.7Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 .31 3.2 .59 13.8CaO 49.8 0 0 4.4MgO 1.87 .35 .13 .31SO.sub.3 .11 0 .07 .81K.sub.2 O .1 .76 .01 1.35H.sub.2 O 1.52 7.5 12.4 0LOI 41.6 14.6 1.32 6.54C.F. -1.49 -10.67 27.22 25.44TOTALS 100.09 99.92 100.13 99.95______________________________________
By another alternative, the estimated components for each raw material are multiplied by the ratio T.sub.i /W.sub.i to adjust for the degree of divergence between the theoretical and actual proportions being fed into the raw matrix. Adjusting the Analysis of Table VI by the T.sub.i /W.sub.i ratios derived from Tables VII and IX, generates the same revised Analysis as is shown in Table XII for the first alternative technique described.
Thus there are alternative techniques to the preferred embodiment which are also responsive to the degree of divergence between T.sub.i and W.sub.i. Additionally, each component of each raw material need not be adjusted in order to obtain some of the benefits of the present invention. For instance, with the specific control moduli used in the preferred embodiment (LSF, SR and AIR), it is more significant to adjust the components which are factored into the control moduli (calcium oxide, alumina oxide, silica oxide, and ferric oxide) than the other components which do not affect the moduli and thus do not affect the monitored characteristics of the raw mix. Additionally, where there is uniformity as to certain of the components in the raw materials being mixed, then the remaining, fluctuating components may be singly adjusted.
It should also be noted that while the revised chemical analyses provide accurate representations of the chemical composition of the raw materials in total, and provide a reliable basis for the adjusted proportioning of the mixture of the raw materials, they are not necessarily individually accurate for each individual raw material. Thus a raw material such as diaspore, which is uniformly constant, will nonetheless be subject to adjustments in its "estimated" analysis. Such adjustments, while not representative of changes in the chemical composition of the diaspore are implicitly taking into account variations in the chemical compositions of the other raw materials which affect the quantity of diaspore that need be introduced. Thus, in the above provided example, the adjustment of the diaspore may be generally described as taking into account variations in silica oxide and alumina oxide occurring in the other raw materials, notably the limestone and the tripoli. The adjustment, while not accurately representing a variation in the chemical compositon of the diaspore, is reliable for the purpose of proportioning the introduction of the several raw materials to mix the desired relative quantities of silica oxide and alumina oxide.
The preferred embodiment is also useful in the detection of weighfeeder malfunctions by comparing the correction factors with maximum allowable corrections. In the preferred embodiment, the following maximum correction factors are used:
TABLE XIII______________________________________Maximum Corrections - Weighfeeder Malfunction Detection______________________________________ Limestone .+-.5% Diaspore .+-.50% Tripoli .+-.20% Flyash .+-.30%______________________________________
In the event that a correction factor exceeds the maximum correction for that raw material, then a weighfeeder malfunction is indicated. For instance, a correction of 35% for flyash exceeds the maximum allowed correction for flyash. The detection of this occurrance indicates a faulty weighfeeder condition, such as the feeder opening becoming occluded. In response to this indication, the faulty condition can be checked out and corrected, thus further mixing under the faulty condition is prevented.
Once the raw material analysis has been indirectly adjusted to account for variations in the chemical content of the raw materials being introduced, the next step is to compare the chemical analysis of the raw mix most recently produced with the overall desired chemical composition of the raw mix and to determine the adjustment that should be made in the target figures over the next period to most nearly approximate the overall desired chemical compositions in the overall raw mix. Overcompensation is to be avoided, as it may result in undersirable fluctuations in the chemical compositions in the raw mix. On the other hand, under compensation will fail to correct for the inaccuracy of the prior off-target mixing periods.
In making the adjustments in the targets for the next subsequent period, use is made of a "Raw Mix Matrix". Because of the large quantities of materials entering the raw mix bin, the large quantity leaving the bin to enter the kiln, and the adjustments being made in the proportions of raw materials being mixed, as well as the chemical changes in the raw materials themselves, it is difficult to precisely estimate the overall chemical composition in the overall raw mix at any one time. Thus, a "Raw Mix Matrix" is used to approximate the overall chemical composition in the raw mix. In the preferred embodiment, such a "Raw Mix Matrix" includes the previous seven raw mix analyses and a weight factor for each analysis (100 for the most recent analysis, then 100, 96, 87, 71, 71, 50 and 26 respectively for the next six previous analyses). These last seven analyses are used to generate a weighted average of the estimated chemical composition of the overall raw mix. From the weighted average, weighted estimations of the overall characteristics (LSF.sub.A, SR.sub.A, and AIR.sub.A) are determined. For example, the following time weighted raw mix matrix in Table XIV generates the overall characteristics of Table VIII.
TABLE XIV__________________________________________________________________________Time Weighted Raw Mix Matrix__________________________________________________________________________SILICA 16.13 14.01 14.33 14.51 14.37 14.63 14.21ALUMINA 2.80 2.61 2.68 2.71 2.71 2.76 2.75IRON 1.76 1.83 1.70 1.56 1.49 1.64 1.63CALCIUM 41.40 43.60 43.30 43.39 43.48 43.12 43.42TONS 292.90 510.31 356.10 416.72 385.20 654.79 418.50W FACT 100.00 100.00 96.00 87.00 71.00 50.00 26.00__________________________________________________________________________
The overall actual characteristics (LSF.sub.A, SR.sub.A, and AIR.sub.A) are compared with the overall target characteristics (LSF, SR, and AIR) to determine the deviation of the actual composition from the desired overall composition, and, based upon the deviation, new targets for the next subsequent period are determined. The new targets correct the overall actual composition of the raw mix toward the overall desired composition, while maintaining continuity in the mix and avoiding abrupt fluctuations.
In the preferred embodiment, the following formula is used to determine the new targets (Ch.sub.D for subsequent period) based upon the deviation between the actual composition (Ch.sub.A) and the desired overall composition (Ch): ##EQU7## In the above formula, M is a selected constant which represents the maximum allowable correction. In the preferred embodiment, the following maximum corrections (M) are used.
TABLE XV______________________________________Maximum Corrections (M) M______________________________________ LSF 4.0% SR .3% AIR .3%______________________________________
In this manner, a decreasing proportionate adjustment is provided, as the deviation increases, until the maximum allowed adjustment is reached. Further deviations are corrected by the maximum allowed adjustment. Correction is achieved, continuity in the raw mix composition is maintained, and undesirable fluctuations due to overcorrection are avoided. Such overcorrections may otherwise tend to occur, for instance, where there is a temporary abbreviation in the chemical composition in one of the materials.
Thus, by applying the above described method of target adjustment to the overall actual compositions given in Table VIII and the overall desired compositions given in Table V, the following new targets are obtained:
TABLE XV______________________________________New Targets (Ch.sub.D)______________________________________ LSF 94.02 SR 3.27 AIR 1.69______________________________________
Due to the relative small deviations in the example provided, the non linear nature of the target adjustment in the preferred embodiment is not apparent from Table XVI. Table XVII illustrates the decreasing proportionate nature in correction over a range of possible actual compositions, given the desired overall LSF to be 94.0%.
TABLE XVII______________________________________ActualComposition New Target Deviation Correction(LSF.sub.A) (LSF.sub.D) (LSF.sub.A - LSF) (LSF.sub.D - LSF)______________________________________84.0 98.00 -10.0 4.086.0 98.00 -8.0 4.088.0 97.99 -6.0 3.9990.0 97.37 -4.0 3.3792.0 95.92 -2.0 1.9294.0 94.00 .0 .096.0 92.08 2.0 -1.9298.0 90.63 4.0 -3.37100.0 90.01 6.0 -3.99102.0 90.00 8.0 -4.0104.0 90.00 10.0 -4.0______________________________________
Finally, new weighfeeder setpoints to be used over the next subsequent period are determined, based upon the new target and the revised raw material compositions. The same Gaussian reduction method is used was was initially described to determine actual weighfeeder setpoints (W.sub.i).
Based upon the new targets (Table XV) and the revised estimated chemical compositions (Table XII), the following new weighfeeder setpoints are calculated:
TABLE XVII______________________________________New Weighfeeder Setpoints (W.sub.i)______________________________________ Limestone 83.2 Diaspore 2.8 Tripoli 8.2 Flyash 5.8______________________________________
Based upon the new weighfeeder setpoints (W.sub.i), the hereinabove described steps of producing raw mix in relative proportions W.sub.i, analyzing the raw mix produced, determining the theoretical relative proportions, adjusting the estimated chemical compositions in response to the degrees of divergence between T.sub.i and W.sub.i, checking for weighfeeder malfunctions, and revising the raw mix targets are reiterated.
Wherefore, while there have been described above the principles of this invention in connection with specific apparatus and techniques, it is to be clearly understood that this description is made only by way of an example and not as a limitation to the scope of the invention. ##SPC1## ##SPC2## ##SPC3## ##SPC4## ##SPC5## ##SPC6## ##SPC7## ##SPC8## ##SPC9## ##SPC10## ##SPC11## ##SPC12## ##SPC13## ##SPC14## ##SPC15## ##SPC16## ##SPC17## ##SPC18## ##SPC19## ##SPC20## ##SPC21## ##SPC22## ##SPC23## ##SPC24## ##SPC25## ##SPC26## ##SPC27##

Claims

1. A method for regulating the mixture of limestone with other raw materials to produce a cement raw mix of desired composition, said method comprising the steps of:
(1) estimating the chemical composition of the limestone and the several other raw materials;
(2) selecting the desired characteristics (Ch) of the overall raw mix composition;
(3) determining the relative proportions (W.sub.i) of raw material to produce raw mix of the desired characteristics (Ch.sub.D);
(4) producing raw mix for a time interval by mixing raw materials in relative proportions (W.sub.i);
(5) after producing the raw mix for the time interval, directly analyzing the chemical composition of the raw mix and calculating the actual characteristics (Ch.sub.A) of the raw mix;
(6) determining the theoretical relative proportions (T.sub.i) of the raw materials that could have theoretically produced the actual characteristics of the raw mix;
(7) adjusting the estimated chemical compositions of the limestone and the several other raw materials by adjusting estimated components in response to the degree of divergence between T.sub.i and W.sub.i in the limestone and for the several other raw materials;
(8) reselecting the desired characteristics of the raw mix composition (Ch.sub.D) over the next subsequent time interval to adjust the overall raw mix towards the overall desired characteristics (Ch); and
(9) repeating steps three through eight.
2. The method of claim 1 in which said chemical composition estimating includes the steps of:
(a) directly analyzing the chemical composition of the several other raw materials;
(b) producing raw mix by mixing the limestone and the several other raw materials for a time interval in relative proportions (P.sub.i):
(c) directly analyzing the chemical composition of the raw mix produced by said mixing in relative proportions (P.sub.i); and
(d) based upon differences in component presence between the raw mix produced by said mixing in relative porportions (P.sub.i) and the combined several other raw materials, estimating the chemical composition of the limestone.
3. The method of claim 1 additionally including the steps of checking for faulty weighfeeder conditions, said checking including sensing the degree of divergence between T.sub.i and W.sub.i.
4. The method of claim 3 in which said checking for faulty weighfeeder conditions additionally includes comparing the degree of actual divergence between T.sub.i and W.sub.i for each raw material with selected maximum permissible divergence (non-fault condition) for each raw material, and indicating the possibility of weighfeeder malfunction when the degree of actual divergence for a raw material exceeds the maximum permissible divergence (non-fault condition) for that raw material.
5. The method of claim 1 in which said selecting of new desired characteristics for the next subsequent time period includes selecting of new desired characteristics which compensatingly deviate from the overall desired characteristics in a manner which is decreasingly proportionate with respect to the extent of deviation between the overall desired characteristics and the actual characteristics of the raw mix.
6. The method of claim 5 in which said reselecting of the desired characteristics (Ch.sub.D) of the raw mix composition over the next subsequent time interval includes adjusting the overall desired characteristics (Ch) by the following formula: ##EQU8## where M is a selected maximum correction.
7. The method of claim 1 in which said calculating of actual characteristics of the raw mix includes calculating characteristics based upon a time weighted average of the chemical analyses of the raw mix over several previous time intervals.
8. A method for regulating the mixture of limestone with other raw materials to produce a cement raw mix of desired composition, said method comprising the steps of:
(1) selecting the desired characteristics of the raw mix to be produced;
(2) based upon estimated chemical compositions of the limestone and the other raw materials, determining the relative proportions of the limestone (W.sub.L) and of the other raw materials to be mixed to produce a raw mix having the selected desired characteristics;
(3) producing a raw mix for a time interval by mixing limestone with other raw materials in the determined relative proportions;
(4) after producing the raw mix for the time interval, directly analyzing the chemical composition of the produced raw mix;
(5) determining the relative proportion (T.sub.L) of limestone that, based upon the estimated chemical compositions of the limestone, would theoretically have produced raw mix having the analyzed chemical composition;
(6) adjusting the estimated chemical composition of the limestone by adjusting at least the estimated calcium oxide, silica oxide, aluminum oxide and iron oxide content in the limestone in response to the degree of divergence between T.sub.L and W.sub.L ; and
(7) repeating steps one through three.
9. The method of claim 8 in which said chemical composition estimating includes the steps of:
(a) directly analyzing the chemical composition of the several other raw materials;
(b) producing raw mix by mixing the limestone and the several other raw materials for a time interval in relative proportions (P.sub.i):
(c) directly analyzing the chemical composition of the raw mix produced by said mixing in relative proportions (P.sub.i); and
(d) based upon differences in component presence between the raw mix produced by said mixing in relative proportions (P.sub.i) and the combined several other raw materials, estimating the chemical composition of the limestone.
10. The method of claim 8 in which said adjusting of the estimated chemical composition includes adjusting the estimated silica oxide, aluminum oxide, and iron oxide content in each of the raw materials in response to the degree of divergence between T.sub.i and W.sub.i for each of the raw materials.
11. A method for regulating the mixture of limestone with other raw materials to produce a cement raw mix of desired composition, said method comprising the steps of:
(1) estimating the chemical composition of the limestone and the several other raw materials, including estimating of the calcium oxide content (C) the silica oxide content (S) the alumina oxide content (A) and the ferric oxide content (F) in the raw materials;
(2) selecting the desired characteristics of the overall raw mix composition, including the desired Lime Saturation Factor (LSF), the desired Silica Ratio (SR), and the desired Aluminum to Iron Ratio (AIR);
(3) solving the following sets of equations to determine the relative proportions (W.sub.i) of raw material to produce raw mix of the desired characteristics: ##EQU9## (4) producing raw mix for a time interval by mixing raw materials in relative proportions W.sub.i ;
(5) after producing the raw mix for the time interval, directly analyzing the chemical composition of the raw mix (C.sub.A, S.sub.A, A.sub.A, F.sub.A . . . ) and calculating the Lime Saturation Factor (LSF.sub.A), the Silica Ratio (SR.sub.A) and the Aluminum to Iron Ratio (AIR.sub.A) of the raw mix produced;
(6) solving the following sets of equations to determine the theoretical relative proportions (T.sub.i) of the raw materials that would have theoretically produced the actual composition of the raw mix: ##EQU10## (7) adjusting the estimated chemical compositions of the limestone and the several other raw materials by adjusting at least the estimated calcium oxide (C), content in each of the raw materials in response to the degree of divergence between T.sub.i and W.sub.i respectively for each of the raw materials;
(8) reselecting the desired characteristics of the raw mix composition (LSF.sub.D, SR.sub.D, AIR.sub.D) for the next subsequent time interval to adjust the overall raw mix towards the overall desired characteristics (LSF, SR, AIR); and
(9) repeating steps three through eight.
12. The method of claim 11 additionally including the steps of checking for faulty weighfeeder conditions, said checking including sensing the degree of divergence between T.sub.i and W.sub.i.
13. The method of claim 12 in which said checking for faulty weighfeeder conditions additionally includes comparing degree of actual divergence between T.sub.i and W.sub.i for each raw material with selected maximum permissible divergence (non-fault condition) for each raw material, and indicating the possibility of weighfeeder malfunction when the degree of actual divergence for a raw material exceeds the maximum permissible divergence (non-fault condition) for that raw material.
14. A method for regulating the mixture of limestone with other raw materials to produce a cement raw mix of desired composition, said method comprising the steps of:
(1) estimating the chemical composition of the limestone and the several other raw materials, including estimating of the calcium oxide content (C) the silica oxide content (S) the alumina oxide content (A) and the ferric oxide content (F) in the raw materials;
(2) selecting the desired characteristics of the overall raw mix composition, including the desired Lime Saturation Factor (LSF), the desired Silica Ratio (SR), and the desired Aluminum to Iron Ratio (AIR);
(3) solving the following sets of equations to determine the relative proportions (W.sub.i) of raw material to produce raw mix of the desired characteristics: ##EQU11## (4) producing raw mix for a time interval by mixing raw materials in relative proportions W.sub.i ;
(5) after producing the raw mix for the time interval, directly analyzing the chemical composition of the raw mix (C.sub.A, S.sub.A, A.sub.A, F.sub.A . . . ) and calculating the Lime Saturation Factor (LSF.sub.A), the Silica Ratio (SR.sub.A) and the Aluminum to Iron Ratio (AIR.sub.A) of the raw mix produced;
(6) solving the following sets of equations to determine the theoretical relative proportions (T.sub.i) of the raw materials that would have theoretically produced the actual composition of the raw mix: ##EQU12## (7) adjusting the estimated chemical compositions of the limestone and the several other raw materials by adjusting at least the estimated calcium oxide (C), silica oxide (S), aluminum oxide (A), and iron oxide (F) content in the limestone in response to the degree of divergence between T.sub.limestone and W.sub.limestone.
(8) reselecting the desired characteristics of the raw mix composition (LSF.sub.D, SR.sub.D, AIR.sub.D) over the next subsequent time interval to adjust the overall raw mix towards the overall desired characteristics (LSF, SR, AIR); and
(9) repeating steps three through eight.
15. The method of claim 14 in which said chemical composition estimating includes the steps of:
(a) directly analyzing the chemical composition of the several other raw materials;
(b) producing raw mix by mixing the limestone and the several other raw materials for a time interval in relative proportions (P.sub.i);
(c) directly analyzing the chemical composition of the raw mix produced by said mixing in relative proportions (P.sub.i); and
(d) based upon differences in component presence between the raw mix produced by said mixing in relative porportions (P.sub.i) and the combined several other raw materials, estimating the chemical composition of the limestone.
16. The method of claim 14 additionally including the step of adjusting estimated components in the other raw materials in response to the degree of divergence between T.sub.i and W.sub.i for each of the other raw materials.
17. The method of claim 16 additionally including the steps of checking for faulty weighfeeder conditions, said checking including sensing the degree of divergence between T.sub.i and W.sub.i.
18. THe method of claim 16 in which said checking for faulty weighfeeder conditions additionally includes comparing degree of actual divergence between T.sub.i and W.sub.i for each raw material with selected maximum permissible divergence (non-fault condition) for each raw material, and indicating the possibility of weighfeeder malfunction when the degree of actual divergence for a raw material exceeds the maximum permissible divergence (non-fault condition) for that raw material.
19. The method of claim 16 in which said selecting of new desired characteristics for the next subsequent time period includes selecting of new desired characteristics which compensatingly deviate from the overall desired characteristics in a manner which is decreasingly proportionate to the extent of deviation between the overall desired characteristics and the actual characteristics of the raw mix.
20. The method of claim 16 in which said reselecting of the desired characteristics (Ch.sub.D of the raw mix composition over the next subsequent time interval includes adjusting the overall desired characteristics (Ch) by the following formula: ##EQU13## where M is a selected maximum correction.
21. The method of claim 16 in which said calculating of actual characteristics of the raw mix includes calculating characteristics based upon a time weighted average of the chemical analyses of the raw mix over several previous time intervals.

US Referenced Citations (8)

Number	Name	Date
2883173	Laboulais	Apr 1959
2969227	Ludwig	Jan 1961
2977105	Pyzel	Mar 1961
3233973	Veo et al.	Feb 1966
3437325	Putnam et al.	Apr 1969
3483363	Ross	Dec 1969
3602488	Romig	Aug 1971
3835873	Wildpaner	Sep 1974

Method of manufacturing cement raw mix

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

US Referenced Citations (8)