Method of manufacturing electrical cable, and resulting product, with reduced required installation pulling force

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10763010
  • Patent Number
    10,763,010
  • Date Filed
    Friday, June 22, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 1, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
Disclosed are cable types, including a type THHN cable, the cable types having a reduced surface coefficient of friction, and the method of manufacture thereof, in which the central conductor core and insulating layer are surrounded by a material containing nylon or thermosetting resin. A silicone based pulling lubricant for said cable, or alternatively, erucamide or stearyl erucamide for small cable gauge wire, is incorporated, by alternate methods, with the resin material from which the outer sheath is extruded, and is effective to reduce the required pulling force between the formed cable and a conduit during installation.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to electrical cables, more particularly to THHN electrical cables, and even more particularly to methods for reducing the surface coefficient of friction and required installation pulling force thereof, as well as preferred pulling lubricant compositions for effecting such reductions.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Electrical cables include a conductor core and typically include an outer jacket or sheath. The term “sheath,” as used herein and throughout the specification and claims, is defined to mean the outermost protective jacket or covering surrounding a conductor core, whether of a single type material or multiple layers of the same or different material. The conductor core may typically be, for example, a single metal wire, multiple small wires twisted together to make a “stranded” cable, or multiple insulated wires or other type electrical conductors acting together to serve a particular function (e.g., three-phase connection). The sheath may comprise one or more layers of polymeric or other material to provide physical, mechanical, electrical insulating and/or chemical protection for the underlying cable components. For the purpose of type THHN cable of the present invention, the exterior portion of the sheath is of nylon. Specifically, type THHN cable comprises a conductor core of a single solid or stranded conductor, surrounded by a layer of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) electrical insulation, covered by an outer layer of nylon.


Installation of electrical cable often requires that it be pulled through tight spaces or small openings in, and in engagement with, narrow conduits, raceways, cabletrays, or passageways in rafters or joists. This becomes problematic since the exterior surface of the cable sheath normally has a high coefficient of friction, therefore requiring a large pulling force. Moreover, installation parameters include maximum allowable cable pulling tension and/or sidewall pressure limits. Exceeding these limits can result in degradation of the cable, physical damage and inferior installation.


To overcome this problem, the general industry practice has been to coat the exterior surface of the cable sheath with a pulling lubricant at the job site in order to reduce the coefficient of friction between this surface and the conduit walls or like surfaces, typically using vaselines or lubricants produced specifically, and well known in the industry for such purpose, such as Yellow 77® (hereinafter, “Y 77”). The term “pulling lubricant,” as used herein and throughout the specification and claims, is defined to mean lubricating material which sufficiently reduces the coefficient of friction of the exterior surface of the sheath of the cable to facilitate the pulling of the cable.


The aforementioned industry practice of applying a pulling lubricant like Y 77 to the finished cable at the job site poses problems, principally due to the additional time, expense and manpower required to lubricate the finished cable surface at the job site as well as to clean up after the lubricating process is completed. Alternative solutions have been tried but are generally unsuccessful, including the extrusion of a lubricant layer over the extruded polymeric sheath during the manufacturing of the cable, or the application of granules of material to the still-hot sheath during the extrusion process, which granules are designed to become detached when the cable is pulled through the duct. However, these solutions not only require major alterations of the manufacturing line, but result in a loss in manufacturing time, increased economic costs, and undesirable fluctuations in the geometrical dimensions of the cable sheaths.


It is also important to an understanding of the present invention to know the difference between what are referred to as “pulling lubricants” and what are “processing lubricants.” A pulling lubricant is a lubricant that appears at the outside surface of the sheath of the cable and is effective to lower the surface coefficient of friction such as to reduce the force necessary to pull the cable along or through building surfaces or enclosures. A processing lubricant is lubricating material that is used to facilitate the cable manufacturing process, such as the flow of polymer chains during any polymer compounding as well as during the extrusion processes while the polymer is in its molten or melt phase. Cable manufacturers have long used processing lubricants, such as stearic acid or ethylene bis-stearamide wax, as a minor component of the polymeric compound from which the cable sheath is formed. Because a processing lubricant is normally not effective except when the polymer is in this melt phase, the effect of a processing lubricant is essentially non-existent in the final hardened polymer sheath of the cable. Even where there may be an excessive amount of the processing lubricant, a separate pulling lubricant would still be required to sufficiently reduce the cable sheaths' exterior surface coefficient of friction in order to minimize the pulling force necessary to install the cable.


Accordingly, there has been a long-felt need for an effective method of providing a pulling lubricant at the exterior surface of the finished cable, and particularly the finished THHN cable, which is effective to reduce the cable surface coefficient of friction and minimize the required installation pulling force, without incurring the inconvenience and time-consuming operation and expense associated with the application of the pulling lubricant at the installation site, nor significantly increasing the complexity and cost of the manufacturing process, nor undesirably altering the geometrical characteristics of the cable sheaths.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The process of the present invention accomplishes these objectives for THHN cable by a cable manufacturing process in which a particular pulling lubricant, of optimum weight percentage or quantity, is introduced into the manufacturing process at a particular stage of manufacture, which results in the pulling lubricant being present in the outer sheath, so that it is available to reduce the coefficient of friction of the exterior sheath surface when the cable is to be installed. Depending upon the material of the sheath and the type of lubricant, this may be as a consequence of the migration, or delayed migration or “blooming,” of the pulling lubricant to the sheath surface; or alternatively, due to the permeation of the pulling lubricant throughout the sheath. Under these circumstances, the pulling lubricant is effective to lower the surface coefficient of friction below that of the inherent coefficient of friction of the material from which the outer layer of the THHN sheath is formed, thereby reducing the required installation pulling force.


In accordance with the process of the invention, and as described below in greater detail, the pulling lubricant is selectively chosen to provide the optimum results with respect to the particular nylon sheath material, and may alternately be introduced into the THHN cable manufacturing process at various stages, ranging from the initial compounding of the lubricant with the polymeric nylon material to form lubricated pellets from which the sheath is to be formed, to mixing the lubricant with the nylon sheath material before introduction of the mixture into the extrusion process, to its introduction into the sheath extrusion process while the nylon sheath forming material is in its molten state.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other details and aspects of the invention, as well as the advantages thereof, will be more readily understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of typical equipment used in the manufacture of cable in accordance with the present invention, when mixing the lubricant with the nylon material prior to extrusion;



FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of test data comparing the effect of different pulling lubricants in small size THHN cable in which the outer sheath material is nylon;



FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of test data comparing both the effects of different pulling lubricants and different percentages of pulling lubricant in large size THHN cable in which the outer sheath material is nylon;



FIGS. 4 and 5 are representations of test devices which may be used to create the aforementioned test data; and



FIG. 6 is a section view of a THHN cable produced in accordance with the process of the present invention.



FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a first type of joist-pull test apparatus used to characterize the present invention.



FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating a modified type of joist-pull test apparatus used to characterize the present invention.





DESCRIPTION

Referring initially to FIG. 1, there is depicted typical equipment 11 for manufacturing electrical cable 12 in accordance with one process of the present invention. The outer sheath of the cable is of an extruded polymer material, specifically nylon. The equipment 11 may include a reel 13 which supplies conductor wire 14 to an extruding head 15. In flow communication with the extrusion head is a tank 16 of the nylon pellets 17. A tank 18 with the desired pulling lubricant 19 is adapted to be in flow communication with the tank 16 by way of conduit 22, thus enabling the mixing of the pulling lubricant with the nylon pellets 17, the mixture thereafter introduced into the extruder. Alternatively, the tank may be adapted to be in fluid communication with the extruder or extrusion head 15, by way of conduit 23, downstream from the point of entry of the nylon material, thus allowing the pulling lubricant to mix with the nylon material while in its molten state in the extruder or extruder head. A cooling box 20 for cooling the extruded product is provided, and a reel 21 is positioned for taking up the resulting cable assembly 12. When the final cable construction is such that there are multiple layers of sheath material, the pulling lubricant should desirably be incorporated into the outermost layer.


As is therefore evident, the pulling lubricant can be mixed with the material from which the outer sheath is to be extruded prior to extrusion or, alternatively, introduced into the extruding head for subsequent mixing with the molten extrusion material as the sheath is being formed. As a further alternative, the pulling lubricant can be initially compounded with the polymeric material of the pellets themselves in a process upstream of that depicted in FIG. 1, thereby forming lubricated polymeric pellets, thus eliminating the need for tank 18 and conduits 22 and 23.


Polymeric materials that can be used for an insulating layer or outer sheath of different type of cable include polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinylchloride, organic polymeric thermosetting and thermoplastic resins and elastomers, polyolefins, copolymers, vinyls, olefin-vinyl copolymers, polyamides, acrylics, polyesters, fluorocarbons, and the like. As previously described, for the THHN cable of the present invention, the conductor core of a single solid or stranded conductor is surrounded by an insulating layer of PVC covered by an outer sheath of a polyamide (e.g., nylon).


In accordance with the testing subsequently described, it has been determined that, for THHN cable, silicone oil is the preferred pulling lubricant. For small gauge THHN wire, erucamide is an alternative preferred pulling lubricant, to be incorporated in the nylon sheath.


The efficacy of these pulling lubricants for the nylon sheath, and specifically an optimum range for the quantity of such lubricants, in accordance with the invention, has been proven by the use of various tests. Prior to discussing the results of such tests, these test methods and their equipment are described as follows:


Testing Methods


Coefficient of Friction Test


Referring now to FIG. 4, diagrammatically illustrated is the apparatus for a coefficient of friction test. The coefficient of friction test apparatus was developed to give a consistent way to determine the input values necessary to use the industry-standard program published by PolyWater Corporation to calculate a real-world coefficient of friction for a given cable being pulled in conduit. Given the inputs for the conduit setup, the back tension on the wire, and the pulling tension on the pulling rope, this program back-calculated a coefficient of friction for the cable by subtracting the back tension from the pulling tension and attributing the remaining tension on the rope to frictional forces between the cable and the conduit.


The overall setup used a pulling rope threaded through ˜40′ of PVC conduit (appropriately sized for the cable being pulled) with two 90° bends. Three 100′ pieces of THHN cable were cut and laid out parallel to one another in line with the first straight section of conduit, and the rope connected to them using industry-standard practice. The other end of the THHN cable was attached to a metal cable which was wrapped around a cylinder with an air brake to allow the application of constant back tension on the setup.


The metal cable was threaded through a load cell so that it could be monitored in real-time, and continuously logged. The pulling rope was similarly threaded through a load cell and constantly monitored and logged. Values for both back tension and pulling tension were logged for the time it took to pull cable through the conduit run. These values were then averaged and used in the PolyWater program to calculate coefficient of friction.


Specific Type THHN Tests


Initial tests of small gauge Type THHN wire were performed using the small-scale tension tester shown in FIG. 5. In this test, multiple individual American Wire Gauge (AWG) size 12 THHN wires were provided on the payoff and attached to a metal pulling tape that was threaded through an arrangement of ½″ conduit that included about 50 feet of straight conduit and four 90° bends. A pulling rope was attached to the other end of the pulling tape and a tugger was used to pull the cable arrangement through the conduit. The rope was threaded through a pulley arrangement that used a load cell to monitor rope tension while the wire was pulled through the conduit. This tension was continuously logged and averaged to give an average pulling force for the pull. This force correlated directly to the coefficient of friction for the cable.


Using the data obtained from the small scale pull test of FIG. 5, FIG. 2 illustrates a comparison of the different required pulling forces for a small gauge cable consisting of multiple (AWG) size 12 THHN conductors. The test subjects had 0.25-0.85% of two different potential pulling lubricants, erucamide and stearyl erucamide, mixed into the outer nylon sheath. Results of the test are shown in FIG. 2 and compared to the results for the standard THHN product without any pulling lubricant and with the externally applied industry-standard Y77. This test shows that erucamide is one preferred lubricant for small gauge THHN cable, in an optimum percentage of approximately 0.85%, by weight.


Next, large gauge Type THHN cable was tested. Using the coefficient of friction test of FIG. 4, FIG. 3 illustrates the different values of surface coefficient of friction of the exterior surface of the sheath, for cables consisting of three individual large gauge AWG 4/0 THHN conductors, for varying percentages of the pulling lubricant, silicone oil, of varying molecular weights. The two lubricants compared in FIG. 3 are a high-molecular weight silicone oil (HMW Si) and a lower molecular weight silicone oil (LMW Si). Comparison results are shown for this same THHN cable arrangement lubricated with industry-standard Y77, as well as with respect to three other trial pulling lubricants, fluorinated oil, molydisulfide, and stearyl erucamide. The results in FIG. 3 illustrate that, while other pulling lubricants can reduce the coefficient of friction of the exterior surface of the cable, the preferred pulling lubricant for THHN cable, and particularly large gauge THHN cable, is a high molecular weight silicone oil added at a level of approximately 9%, by weight, or higher.


In accordance with an advantage of the present invention, the pulling lubricant that is incorporated in the sheath is present at the outer surface of the sheath when the cable engages, or in response to the cable's engagement with, the duct or other structure through which the cable is to be pulled. For the THHN cable of the present invention, where the outer sheath is of nylon and the preferred pulling lubricant is high molecular weight silicone oil, this silicon-based lubricant permeates the entire nylon sheath portion and is, in effect, continuously squeezed to the sheath surface in what is referred to as the “sponge effect,” when the cable is pulled through the duct.


Compounding with Pulling Lubricant


As previously described, the pulling lubricant may be incorporated into the extruded sheath (or the outer layer of the cable sheath if the sheath is of multiple layers) by initially compounding the lubricant with the (outer) sheath material to be extruded. To prepare the lubricated blend of the present invention, the resin and additional components, including the pulling lubricant, are fed into any one of a number of commonly used compounding machines, such as a twin-screw compounding extruder, Buss kneader, Banbury mixer, two-roll mill, or other heated shear-type mixer. The melted, homogeneous blend is then extruded into strands or cut into strips that may be subsequently chopped into easily handled pellets. The so-prepared lubricated pellets are then fed into the extruder for forming the outer sheath.


THHN Cable


THHN and THWN-2 are types of insulated electrical conductors that cover a broad range of wire sizes and applications. THHN or THWN-2 conductors are typically 600 volt copper conductors with a sheath comprising an outer layer of nylon surrounding a layer of thermoplastic insulation and are heat, moisture, oil, and gasoline resistant. THHN cable is primarily used in conduit and cable trays for services, feeders, and branch circuits in commercial or industrial applications as specified in the National Electrical Code and is suitable for use in dry locations at temperatures not to exceed 90° C. Type THWN-2 cable is suitable for use in wet or dry locations at temperatures not to exceed 90° C. or not to exceed 75° C. when exposed to oil or coolant. Type THHN or THWN-2 conductors are usually annealed (soft) copper, insulated with a tough, heat and moisture resistant polyvinylchloride (PVC), over which a polyamide layer, specifically nylon, is applied. Many cables, including those addressed by the present invention, can be “multi-rated,” simultaneously qualifying for rating as THHN or THWN-2.


Referring now to FIG. 6, there is illustrated a THHN cable 24 constructed in accordance with the process of the invention. The cable is characterized by a sheath comprising an extruded layer 25 of PVC insulation material and an overlying extruded thin layer 26 of nylon, the sheath surrounding a central electric conductor 27 which is usually, though not exclusively, of copper. The only limitation on the type of pulling lubricant to be incorporated into the extruded outer nylon sheath is that it be sufficiently compatible with nylon to be co-processed with it, and particularly when compounded with nylon, that it be robust enough to withstand the high processing temperature for nylon, which is typically about 500° F. However, it has been found that for THHN cable, this lubricant is preferably a high molecular weight, high viscosity silicone fluid; for small gauge THHN wire, as an alternative, erucamide or stearyl erucamide.


Two industry-standard processes can be used to produce this product, the so called co-extrusion method and the tandem extrusion method. In both processes, the conductor, either solid or stranded, is first introduced into the extrusion head where the heated, melted PVC insulation compound is introduced and applied to the circumference of the conductor. In the co-extrusion process, the melted nylon compound is introduced into the same extrusion head and applied together with the PVC to the conductor, in a two-layer orientation. In the tandem process the PVC-coated conductor leaves the first extrusion head and is introduced into a second, separate extrusion head where the melted nylon is applied to the surface. In both cases, the final product is then introduced into a cooling water bath and ultimately the cooled product is wound onto reels. In either case, the nylon material is preferably initially compounded with the pulling lubricant to provide the so-lubricated extrusion pellets.


As shown in FIG. 2, small gauge THHN cable prepared, as described, with nylon as the outer layer of the sheath, and containing 0.25%, 0.50% and 0.85%, by weight, of stearyl erucamide, had an average pulling force of 18.1 lbs, 16 lbs and 18.5 lbs, respectively. Even better, small gauge THHN cable containing 0.25%, 0.50% and 0.85%, by weight, of erucamide had an average pulling force of 13.2 lbs, 10.3 lbs and 9.6 lbs, respectively. Comparably, the pulling force for a THHN cable with no pulling lubricant was measured at 38.5 lbs, and THHN cable with only Y 77 applied to the exterior surface was measured at 15.3 lbs. FIG. 3, on the other hand, illustrates the results when silicone oil is used in THHN cable, compared to other potential lubricants, illustrating silicone oil as a much preferred pulling lubricant for this type cable.


EXAMPLE

To understand the effects of the jacket lubricant system on the ease of pull, variations of the UL (Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.) joist pull test were utilized.


The joist pull test outlined in UL719 Section 23 establishes the integrity of the outer PVC jacket of Type NM-B constructions when subjected to pulling through angled holes drilled through wood blocks.


The first variation of the test apparatus (see FIG. 7) consists of an arrangement of 2″×4″ wood blocks having holes drilled at 15° drilled through the broad face. Four of these blocks are then secured into a frame so that the centerlines of the holes are offset 10″ to create tension in the specimen through the blocks. A coil of NM-B is placed into a cold-box and is conditioned at −20° C. for 24 hours. A section of the cable is fed through corresponding holes in the blocks where the end protruding out of the last block is pulled through at 45° to the horizontal. The cable is then cut off and two other specimens are pulled through from the coil in the cold-box. Specimens that do not exhibit torn or broken jackets and maintain conductor spacing as set forth in the Standard are said to comply.


Pulling wire through the wood blocks provides a more direct correlation of the amount of force required to pull NM-B in during installation. Because of this relationship, the joist-pull test is initially the basis for which ease of pulling is measured, but a test for quantifying this “ease” into quantifiable data had to be established.


Accordingly, and as shown in FIG. 8, a variable-speed device was introduced to pull the cable specimen through the blocks. An electro-mechanical scale was installed between the specimen and the pulling device to provide a readout of the amount of force in the specimen. To create back tension a mass of known weight (5-lbs) was tied to the end of the specimen.


Data recorded proved that NM-B constructions having surface lubricates reduced pulling forces.


A 12-V constant speed winch having a steel cable and turning sheave was employed; the turning sheave maintains a 45 degree pulling angle and provides a half-speed to slow the rate of the pulling so that more data points could be obtained. Holes were drilled in rafters whereby specimens could be pulled by the winch.


It was found using this method that lubricated specimens yielded approximately a 50% reduction in pulling force when compared to standard, non-lubricated NM-B specimens. The results are shown in Tables 1 and 2 wherein the data was recorded at five second intervals.










TABLE 1








Specimen Description

















Manu-
Manu-
Manu-
Manu-
Manu-
Manu-





Test Pt.
facturer
facturer
facturer
facturer
facturer
facturer
Control
Control
Present


Descr.
Al
A2
A3
B1
B2
B3
1
2
Invention



















1st Point
26.8
48.3

37.8
37.4

16.5
41.9
24


2nd Point
34.6
51.1

35.2
38.1

41.6
42
20.5


3rd Point
33.7
46.8

32
33

40.2
38.7
20


4th Point
38.6
49.8

34.7
34.6

41.3
29.5
17.4


5th Point
33.1
44.8

34.2
32.5

41.3
34.3
20.2


6th Point
28.6
44.7

32.2
33.2

42.5
35.9
15.8


7th Point
5.5
51

32.2
33.9

41.1
37
17.2


8th Point
26.8
49.2

33.9
33

40.9
38.4
17.3


9th Point
21.9
52.5

32.6
30.6

42.7
37.3
21.9


Average
30.51
48.69

33.87
34.03

41.45
37.22
19.37





AAA - Denotes Outliers













TABLE 2







Std. Prod.








Average
Present Invention


37.6289
19.37












Specimen Description















Manu-
Manu-







Test Pt.
facturer
facturer
Control 1
Control 2
Control 3
Invention A
Invention B


Descr.
14-2
14-2
14-2/12-2
14-2/12-2
14-2/12-2
14-2/12-2
14-2/12-2





1st Point
34
32.6
50
47.5
40.2
21.5
12.3


2nd Point
35
35.7
50.6
38.3
37.5
22.9
12.8


3rd Point
35.5
31.2
46.7
43.2
27.5
29
12.1


4th Point
37.7
35
44.5
46
36.8
22.4
14.9


5th Point
40.5
30.6
46.2
39.5
36
23.3
11.9


6th Point
32.9
28.8
40.9
35.7
41.2
21.1
12.5


7th Point
44.2
32.4
52.8
37.5
37
21.6
11.7


8th Point
43
32.4
40.7
27.7
31.7
22.5
11.7


9th Point
43.4
30.5
40
31.1

19.2
11


Average
40





11.6


1st Point
38.62
32.13
45.82
38.50
35.99
22.61
12.25















14-2/12-2

14-2/12-2
14-2/12-2



Control Avg.

Invention A
Invention B



40.103241

22.61
12.25









Although the aforementioned description references specific embodiments and processing techniques of the invention, it is to be understood that these are only illustrative. For example, although the description has been with respect to electrical cable, it is also applicable to other types of non-electrical cable such as, for example, fiber optic cable. Additional modifications may be made to the described embodiments and techniques without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention as defined solely by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A thermoplastic high heat-resistant nylon-coated (THHN) electrical cable having a reduced installation pulling force through a building passageway defined by a PVC conduit setup sized to accommodate the THHN electrical cable and having at least two 90° bends within the PVC conduit setup, the THHN electrical cable comprising: at least one conductor capable of carrying an electrical current through the THEN electrical cable, wherein the conductor is formed at least in part from a metal; and,a sheath for protecting the conductor, wherein the sheath comprises: an insulating layer surrounding the conductor and providing electrical insulation to the conductor, wherein the insulating layer is formed at least in part from extruded polyvinyl chloride (PVC); andan outer layer surrounding, contacting, and forming a coating for the insulating layer, wherein the outer layer comprises a solidified extrusion of a material mixture, the material mixture comprising: a nylon material; anda pulling lubricant mixed within at least a portion of the nylon material, wherein at least a portion of the pulling lubricant is present at an exterior surface of the sheath to reduce the amount of force required to pull the cable through the building passageway; andwherein the outer layer is both resistant to heat, moisture, oil, and gasoline and provides the THHN electrical cable with the physical characteristic of requiring at least about 30% less force to pull the electrical cable through the building passageway compared to an amount of force required to pull a non-lubricated THEN electrical cable having an extruded sheath without the pulling lubricant mixed therein through the building passageway.
  • 2. The thermoplastic high heat-resistant nylon-coated (THEN) electrical cable of claim 1, wherein the pulling lubricant comprises a silicone oil.
  • 3. The thermoplastic high heat-resistant nylon-coated (THEN) electrical cable of claim 1, wherein the pulling lubricant comprises a high molecular weight silicone based pulling lubricant.
  • 4. The thermoplastic high heat-resistant nylon-coated (THEN) electrical cable of claim 1, wherein the pulling lubricant comprises a low molecular weight silicone based pulling lubricant.
  • 5. The thermoplastic high heat-resistant nylon-coated (THEN) electrical cable of claim 1, wherein the pulling lubricant comprises erucamide.
  • 6. The thermoplastic high heat-resistant nylon-coated (THEN) electrical cable of claim 1, wherein the at least one conductor comprises a plurality of grouped conductors.
  • 7. The thermoplastic high heat-resistant nylon-coated (THEN) electrical cable of claim 1, wherein the at least one conductor is a large gauge conductor.
  • 8. The thermoplastic high heat-resistant nylon-coated (THEN) electrical cable of claim 7, wherein the at least one conductor comprises an AWG 4/0 conductor.
  • 9. The thermoplastic high heat-resistant nylon-coated (THEN) electrical cable of claim 1, wherein the sheath is formed with geometrical characteristics that are not altered relative to the geometrical characteristics of the extruded sheath of the non-lubricated THEN cable.
  • 10. The thermoplastic high heat-resistant nylon-coated (THEN) electrical cable of claim 9, wherein the sheath has a round profile.
  • 11. The thermoplastic high heat-resistant nylon-coated (THEN) electrical cable of claim 1, wherein the THEN electrical cable is rated for use in dry locations at temperatures not to exceed 90° C.
  • 12. The thermoplastic high heat-resistant nylon-coated (THEN) electrical cable of claim 1, wherein the THEN electrical cable is rated to carry current at voltages not to exceed 600 Volts.
  • 13. A thermoplastic high heat-resistant nylon-coated (THEN) electrical cable having a reduced installation pulling force through a building passageway defined by a PVC conduit setup sized to accommodate the THEN electrical cable and having at least two 90° bends within the PVC conduit setup, the THEN electrical cable comprising: at least one conductor capable of carrying an electrical current through the THEN electrical cable, wherein the conductor is formed at least in part from a metal; and,a sheath for protecting the conductor, wherein the sheath comprises: an insulating layer surrounding the conductor and providing electrical insulation to the conductor, wherein the insulating layer is formed at least in part from extruded polyvinyl chloride (PVC); andan outer layer surrounding, contacting, and forming a coating for the insulating layer, wherein the outer layer comprises a solidified extrusion of a material mixture, the material mixture comprising: a nylon material; anda pulling lubricant mixed within at least a portion of the nylon material, wherein at least a portion of the pulling lubricant is present at an exterior surface of the sheath to reduce the amount of force required to pull the cable through the building passageway; andwherein the outer layer is both resistant to heat, moisture, oil, and gasoline and provides the THHN electrical cable with the physical characteristic of requiring at least about 50% less force to pull the electrical cable through the building passageway compared to an amount of force required to pull a non-lubricated THHN electrical cable having an extruded sheath without the pulling lubricant mixed therein through the building passageway.
  • 14. The thermoplastic high heat-resistant nylon-coated (THHN) electrical cable of claim 13, wherein the sheath is formed with geometrical characteristics that are not altered relative to the geometrical characteristics of the extruded sheath of the non-lubricated THHN cable.
  • 15. The thermoplastic high heat-resistant nylon-coated (THHN) electrical cable of claim 14, wherein the sheath has a round profile.
  • 16. A non-metallic sheathed (NM-B) electrical cable having a reduced installation pulling force through a building passageway extending through throughholes drilled at a 15 degree angle through a broadface of each of four 2″×4″ wood blocks, wherein the wood blocks are linearly spaced apart from one another and are offset such that a centerline of each of the throughholes is offset by 10″ relative to one another, the NM-B electrical cable comprising: a conductor core comprising at least two insulated metal conductors capable of carrying an electrical current through the NM-B electrical cable, wherein the conductor is formed at least in part from metal; anda sheath for protecting the conductor core, wherein the sheath comprises a solidified extrusion of a material mixture, the material mixture comprising: an insulating material providing electrical insulation to the conductor core, wherein the insulating material comprises polyvinyl chloride; anda pulling lubricant mixed with at least a portion of the insulating material, wherein at least a portion of the pulling lubricant is present at an exterior surface of the sheath to reduce the amount of force required to pull the cable through the building passageway; andwherein the sheath provides the NM-B electrical cable with the physical characteristic of requiring at least about 30% less force to pull the electrical cable through the building passageway compared to an amount of force required to pull a non-lubricated NM-B electrical cable having an extruded PVC jacket without the pulling lubricant mixed therein through the building passageway.
  • 17. The NM-B electrical cable of claim 16, wherein the pulling lubricant comprises one of erucamide or oleamide.
  • 18. The NM-B electrical cable of claim 17, wherein the pulling lubricant comprises a silicone pulling lubricant.
  • 19. The NM-B electrical cable of claim 17, wherein each of the at least two metal conductors are 14-gauge metal conductors.
  • 20. The NM-B electrical cable of claim 17, wherein each of the at least two metal conductors are 12-gauge metal conductors.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/590,881, filed May 9, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/858,872, filed Sep. 18, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/144,150, filed Dec. 30, 2013, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,142,336 on Sep. 22, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/774,677, filed Feb. 22, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,616,918, issued Dec. 31, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/274,052, filed Oct. 14, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,518, issued Feb. 26, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/787,877, filed May 26, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119, issued Oct. 25, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/675,441, filed Feb. 15, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024, issued Jul. 6, 2010, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/120,487, filed May 3, 2005, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/952,294, filed Sep. 28, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129, issued Aug. 12, 2008. Each patent and patent application identified above is incorporated here by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (201)
Number Name Date Kind
2276437 Vaala Mar 1942 A
2685707 Llewellyn et al. Aug 1954 A
2717515 Pesante Sep 1955 A
2851515 Kolmorgen et al. Sep 1958 A
2930838 Chizallet et al. Mar 1960 A
3064073 Downing et al. Nov 1962 A
3106981 Chakiris Oct 1963 A
3108981 Clark et al. Oct 1963 A
3191005 Cox, II Jun 1965 A
3258031 French Jun 1966 A
3333037 Humphrey et al. Jul 1967 A
3378628 Garner Apr 1968 A
3433884 Martin Mar 1969 A
3668175 Sattler Jun 1972 A
3686436 Camras Aug 1972 A
3747428 Waner et al. Jul 1973 A
3849221 Middleton Nov 1974 A
3852875 McAmis et al. Dec 1974 A
3858687 Masarky et al. Jan 1975 A
3868436 Ootsuji et al. Feb 1975 A
3877142 Hamano et al. Apr 1975 A
3885286 Hill May 1975 A
3925216 Moorhouse Dec 1975 A
3936572 MacKenzie, Jr. et al. Feb 1976 A
4002797 Hacker et al. Jan 1977 A
4043851 Holladay et al. Aug 1977 A
4057956 Tolle Nov 1977 A
4099425 Moore Jul 1978 A
4100245 Horikawa et al. Jul 1978 A
4137623 Taylor Feb 1979 A
4273806 Stechler Jun 1981 A
4274509 Thomson et al. Jun 1981 A
4275096 Taylor Jun 1981 A
4299256 Bacehowski et al. Nov 1981 A
4313645 Cocco Feb 1982 A
4356139 Rowland et al. Oct 1982 A
4360492 Rowland et al. Nov 1982 A
4401361 Slaughter Aug 1983 A
4416380 Flum Nov 1983 A
4454949 Flum Jun 1984 A
4522733 Jonnes Jun 1985 A
4547246 Viriyayuthakorn et al. Oct 1985 A
4568420 Nonni Feb 1986 A
4569420 Pickett et al. Feb 1986 A
4605818 Arroyo et al. Aug 1986 A
4673516 Berry Jun 1987 A
4684214 Goldmann et al. Aug 1987 A
4693936 McGregor et al. Sep 1987 A
4749059 Jonnes et al. Jun 1988 A
4751261 Miyata et al. Jun 1988 A
4761445 Chiba Aug 1988 A
4770902 Barlow et al. Sep 1988 A
4773954 Starnes Sep 1988 A
4806425 Chu-Ba Feb 1989 A
4868054 Kartheiser Sep 1989 A
4877815 Buckmaster et al. Oct 1989 A
4895221 Carlson Jan 1990 A
4910359 Dougherty et al. Mar 1990 A
4937142 Ogushi et al. Jun 1990 A
4940504 Starnes, Jr. Jul 1990 A
4952021 Aoki et al. Aug 1990 A
4965249 De With et al. Oct 1990 A
5036121 Coaker et al. Jul 1991 A
5055522 Ikeda et al. Oct 1991 A
5074640 Hardin et al. Dec 1991 A
5156715 Starnes, Jr. Oct 1992 A
5225635 Wake et al. Jul 1993 A
5227080 Berry Jul 1993 A
5252676 Suyama et al. Oct 1993 A
5324588 Rinehart et al. Jun 1994 A
5326638 Mottine, Jr. et al. Jul 1994 A
5346383 Starnes, Jr. Sep 1994 A
5356710 Rinehart Oct 1994 A
5383799 Fladung Jan 1995 A
5422385 Farkas Jun 1995 A
5457288 Olsson Oct 1995 A
5460885 Chu-Ba Oct 1995 A
5492760 Sarma et al. Feb 1996 A
5505900 Suwanda et al. Apr 1996 A
5523354 Kaufmann et al. Jun 1996 A
5561730 Lochkovic et al. Oct 1996 A
5565242 Buttrick, Jr. et al. Oct 1996 A
5614288 Bustos Mar 1997 A
5614482 Baker et al. Mar 1997 A
5656371 Kawahigashi et al. Aug 1997 A
5660932 Durston Aug 1997 A
5708084 Hauerstein et al. Jan 1998 A
5733823 Sugioka et al. Mar 1998 A
5741858 Brann et al. Apr 1998 A
5753861 Hansen et al. May 1998 A
5852116 Cree et al. Dec 1998 A
5856405 Hofmann Jan 1999 A
5886072 Linsky et al. Mar 1999 A
5912436 Sanchez et al. Jun 1999 A
5925601 McSherry et al. Jul 1999 A
6019628 Shinchi Feb 2000 A
6057018 Schmidt May 2000 A
6064073 Hoogenraad et al. May 2000 A
6080489 Mehta Jun 2000 A
6114036 Rinehart et al. Sep 2000 A
6137058 Moe et al. Oct 2000 A
6146699 Bonicel et al. Nov 2000 A
6159617 Foster et al. Dec 2000 A
6160940 Summers Dec 2000 A
6179665 Rossman et al. Jan 2001 B1
6188026 Cope et al. Feb 2001 B1
6228495 Lupia et al. May 2001 B1
6270849 Popoola et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281431 Cumley Aug 2001 B1
6327841 Bertini et al. Dec 2001 B1
6347561 Uneme et al. Feb 2002 B2
6392155 Shimizu et al. May 2002 B1
6395989 Lecoeuvre et al. May 2002 B2
6416813 Valls Prats et al. Jul 2002 B1
6418704 Bertini et al. Jul 2002 B2
6461730 Bachmann et al. Oct 2002 B1
6474057 Bertini et al. Nov 2002 B2
6485325 Fukuda Nov 2002 B1
6534717 Suzuki et al. Mar 2003 B2
6565242 Dai et al. May 2003 B2
6640533 Bertini et al. Nov 2003 B2
6646205 Hase et al. Nov 2003 B2
6810188 Suzuki et al. Oct 2004 B1
6850681 Lepont et al. Feb 2005 B2
6852412 Keogh Feb 2005 B2
6864420 Li Mar 2005 B2
6897382 Hager et al. May 2005 B2
6903264 Watanabe et al. Jun 2005 B2
6906258 Hirai et al. Jun 2005 B2
6924031 Grizante Redondo et al. Aug 2005 B2
6977280 Lee et al. Dec 2005 B2
7053308 Prats et al. May 2006 B2
7136556 Brown et al. Nov 2006 B2
7144952 Court et al. Dec 2006 B1
7411129 Kummer et al. Aug 2008 B2
7447406 Sutehall et al. Nov 2008 B2
7557301 Kummer et al. Jul 2009 B2
7749024 Chambers et al. Jul 2010 B2
8043119 Kummer et al. Oct 2011 B2
8124875 Aitken et al. Feb 2012 B2
8378009 Inagaki et al. Feb 2013 B2
8382518 Chambers et al. Feb 2013 B2
8616918 Chambers et al. Dec 2013 B2
8658576 Bigbee, Jr. et al. Feb 2014 B1
8701277 Kummer et al. Apr 2014 B2
8800967 Carlson et al. Aug 2014 B2
8844905 Carlson et al. Sep 2014 B2
8883917 Davie et al. Nov 2014 B1
8912253 Montes et al. Dec 2014 B2
8986586 Sasse et al. Mar 2015 B2
9352371 Bigbee et al. May 2016 B1
7749024 Chambers et al. Jul 2016 C1
9412495 Bennett et al. Aug 2016 B1
9431152 Sasse et al. Aug 2016 B2
9587201 Tomsheck et al. Mar 2017 B2
7411129 Kummer et al. Sep 2017 C1
9922756 Smith et al. Mar 2018 B1
20020002221 Lee Jan 2002 A1
20020010252 Lecoeuvre et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020043391 Suzuki et al. Apr 2002 A1
20030098176 Mesaki et al. May 2003 A1
20030161596 Register, III et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030195279 Shah et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030234472 Bolcar Dec 2003 A1
20040001682 Beuth et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040007308 Houston et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040198909 Breitscheidel et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040254299 Lee et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050019353 Prinz et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050023029 Mammeri et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050036753 Will et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050180725 Carlson et al. Aug 2005 A1
20060032661 Gai Feb 2006 A1
20060065428 Kummer et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060065430 Kummer Mar 2006 A1
20060068085 Reece et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060068086 Reece et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060088657 Reece et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060151196 Kummer et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060157303 Reece et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060191621 Kummer et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060249298 Reece et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060249299 Kummer et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060251802 Kummer et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070098340 Lee et al. May 2007 A1
20070243761 Chambers et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080066946 Kummer et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080257599 Matsushita et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080317990 Runyan et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090233052 Thuot et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100230134 Chambers et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100236045 Galindo et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100236811 Sasse et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100326695 Dion et al. Dec 2010 A1
20130153261 Bremser et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130218325 Carlson et al. Aug 2013 A1
20140053389 Galindo et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140113069 Kummer et al. Apr 2014 A1
20150014468 Carlson et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150034891 Carlson et al. Feb 2015 A1
20160012945 Sasse et al. Jan 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (79)
Number Date Country
2006335277 Jan 2008 AU
PI 0609987 Nov 2010 BR
2614485 Feb 2006 CA
2726607 Dec 2009 CA
2755343 Sep 2010 CA
2774428 Apr 2011 CA
101223609 Jul 2008 CN
202917210 May 2013 CN
2528307 Jan 1977 DE
4410456 Sep 1995 DE
P 2011000290 Feb 2012 DO
016504 May 2012 EA
25128 Sep 2011 EG
283132 Sep 1988 EP
364717 Apr 1990 EP
544411 Jun 1993 EP
1524294 Apr 2005 EP
1899987 Mar 2008 EP
1899988 Mar 2008 EP
2402777 May 2013 ES
2674364 Sep 1992 FR
1113611 May 2013 HK
9500996 Mar 2010 IN
59-159708 Sep 1984 JP
61-076409 Apr 1986 JP
61-76409 May 1986 JP
S61-133506 Jun 1986 JP
S61-133507 Jun 1986 JP
63-094503 Jun 1988 JP
63-216220 Sep 1988 JP
1-110013 Apr 1989 JP
1-144504 Jun 1989 JP
1-166410 Jun 1989 JP
1-307110 Dec 1989 JP
5-266720 Oct 1993 JP
6-057145 Mar 1994 JP
7-134913 May 1995 JP
08-222041 Aug 1996 JP
9-045143 Feb 1997 JP
9-180558 Jul 1997 JP
9-251811 Sep 1997 JP
10-012051 Jan 1998 JP
10-086207 Apr 1998 JP
2000-120922 Apr 2000 JP
2001-026401 Jan 2001 JP
2001-031903 Feb 2001 JP
2001-052536 Feb 2001 JP
2001-256836 Sep 2001 JP
2001-264601 Sep 2001 JP
2002-128963 May 2002 JP
2002-231065 Aug 2002 JP
2002-313153 Oct 2002 JP
2002-324438 Nov 2002 JP
2003-323820 Nov 2003 JP
2009-503765 Jan 2009 JP
2013-251270 Dec 2013 JP
2008041151 May 2008 KR
2013056283 May 2013 KR
2007014798 May 2008 MX
2011010044 Jan 2012 MX
564551 Mar 2011 NZ
161929 Jun 2010 SG
WO 1989000763 Jan 1989 WO
WO 1991008262 Jun 1991 WO
WO 2000040653 Jul 2000 WO
WO 2001081969 Nov 2001 WO
WO 2001090230 Nov 2001 WO
WO 2005042226 May 2005 WO
WO 2006016895 Feb 2006 WO
WO 2006016896 Feb 2006 WO
WO 2006118702 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2006127711 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2006135467 Dec 2006 WO
WO 2007081372 Jul 2007 WO
WO 2007084745 Jul 2007 WO
WO-2008146921 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2010111167 Sep 2010 WO
WO 2011046998 Apr 2011 WO
200711170 Aug 2009 ZA
Non-Patent Literature Citations (420)
Entry
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Decision on Petition, Denying Patent Owner's Petition to Strike Requester's Improper Paper, Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), May 10, 2018, 10 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Order Remanding Inter Partes Reexamination to the Examiner, Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Jun. 5, 2018, 10 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,872, dated Jun. 14, 2018, 37 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexam Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), May 18, 2018, 7 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate (1535th ) No. U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Jun. 14, 2018, 2 pages, U.S.
American Polywater Corporation, “www.polywater.com/3000tech.html”, Copyright 2001-2015, Jan. 6, 2009 to Jul. 27, 2015 Internet Archive <http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.polywater.com/3000tech.html>, 4 page.
American Polywater Corporation, “www.polywater.com/techtak1.html” Copyright 2001-2015, Dec. 21, 1997 to Jul. 29, 2015 Internet Archive <http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.polywater.com/techtak1.html>, 5 pages.
Axel Plastics Research Laboratories, Inc., Product Data Sheet re “Mold Wiz, INT-40DHT” (Approx. 2001) (1p).
Axel Plastics Research Laboratories, Inc., Product Data Sheet re “Mold Wiz, INT-40GHT” (Approx. 2001) (1p).
Axel Plastics Research Laboratories, Inc., Product Data Sheet re “Mold Wiz, INT-33PA” (Approx. 2000) (1p).
Cerro Wire Inc., Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Dec. 10, 2014, 135 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Jun. 3, 2014, 76 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Corrected Respondent Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Dec. 10, 2010, 16 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Notice of Cross Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Apr. 4, 2014, 1 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Notice of Cross-Appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Sep. 29, 2014, 4 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Rebuttal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Oct. 22, 2012, 18 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Rebuttal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Jan. 6, 2014, 18 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Rebuttal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Mar. 4, 2015, 18 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Rebuttal Brief on Appeal by Appellant Requestor in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Sep. 29, 2014, 14 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Request for Ex Parte Examination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 90/009,589), Oct. 1, 2009, 380 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Sep. 26, 2008, 112 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Nov. 17, 2010, 63 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Sep. 14, 2012, 95 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Request for Rehearing in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Feb. 16, 2018, 15 pages, U.S.A.
Cerro Wire Inc., Requester Comments on Patent Owner Response after Board Decision, including Exhibits, in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Mar. 15, 2018, 122 pages, U.S.A.
Cerro Wire Inc., Respondent Brief by Third Party Requestor in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Jul. 30, 2014, 95 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Respondent Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Oct. 13, 2010, 30 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Respondent Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Jan. 12, 2015, 136 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Mar. 4, 2009, 44 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Sep. 30, 2009, 38 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), May 14, 2010, 7 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Jun. 1, 2010, 9 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Jul. 14, 2010, 32 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Sep. 30, 2010, 12 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Mar. 2, 2015, 18 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), May 11, 2011, 69 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Jun. 17, 2013, 89 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), May 14, 2014, 211 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Oct. 10, 2014, 7 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Jan. 6, 2014, 40 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Jan. 24, 2014, 14 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire Inc., Response to Decision on Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Mar. 28, 2014, 61 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire LLC, Corrected Response Brief for Cross-Appellant in Southwire Company, LLC v. Cerro Wire LLC, Appeal from United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 2014-005956 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2015-1117, -1118, Mar. 2, 2015, 59 pages.
Cerro Wire LLC, Reply Brief for Cross-Appellant in Southwire Company, LLC v. Cerro Wire LLC, Appeal from United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 2014-005956 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2015-1117, -1118, May 7, 2015, 25 pages.
Cerro Wire LLC., Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Sep. 14, 2012, 96 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire LLC., Request for Oral Hearing for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Jun. 24, 2015, 10 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire LLC., Requestor Comments in Opposition to Request for Rehearing in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Nov. 30, 2015, 10 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire LLC., Response for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Mar. 13, 2013, 49 pages, U.S.
Cerro Wire, Inc., Corrected Response Brief for Appellee in Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Case No. 20162287 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301, Control/Application No. 95/000,696), Dec. 23, 2016, 71 pages.
Cerro Wire, Inc., Exhibit W-11-W-20 (Claim Charts), Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. M311-318 (Control No. 95/000,594); Nov. 17, 2010; pp. 1-1023 (US).
Cerro Wire, Inc., Exhibit W-1-W-10 (Claim Charts), Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. M311-318 (Control No. 95/000,594); Nov. 17, 2010; pp. 1-1023 (US).
Cerro Wire, Inc., Exhibit W-21-W-30 (Claim Charts), Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. M311-318 (Control No. 95/000,594); Nov. 17, 2010; pp. 1-1023 (US).
Cerro Wire, Inc., Exhibit W-31-W-38 (Claim Charts), Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. M311-318 (Control No. 95/000,594); Nov. 17, 2010; pp. 1-1023 (US).
Crompton Corporation brochure on Amides (approx. 2003) (27pp).
Crompton Corporation, Brochure entitled “Vinyl Additives Product Guide”, (2002) (16pp).
Declaration of William N. Unertl, PhD, Reexamination 95/000,573, Exhibit 2, Feb. 25, 2011, 27 pages.
Decoste, J.B., “Friction of Vinyl Chloride Plastics”, SPE Journal, Oct. 1969, pp. 67-71, vol. 25.
Domininghaus, H., “Les Matieres plastiques les plus usuelles,” Informations Chimie no 158, 1976, p. 179-195.
Dow Corning article “Siloxane additive minimizes friction in fibre optic cable conduit”, 2001 (2pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com).
Dow Corning presentation entitled “MBs to Improve CoF—Injection Moulding & Extrusion”; from filed entitled “DC (multibase) Masterbatch training 2004.ppt”; date uncertain; 8 pages (US).
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB25-504 composition, Feb. 1, 2002 (4pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com).
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB40-006 composition, Apr. 11, 2005 (4pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com).
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-001 composition, Jan. 15, 2001 (6pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com).
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-002 composition, Jun. 2, 2014 (3pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com).
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-004 composition, Jan. 15, 2001 (4pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com).
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-008 composition, Apr. 11, 2005 (1 pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com).
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-010 composition, Jan. 16, 2001 (2pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com).
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-011 composition, Apr. 11, 2005 (4pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com).
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-320 composition, Mar. 4, 2008 (1p) (http://www.dowcorning.com).
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-321 composition, Jan. 15, 2001 (2pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com).
Dow Corning Product Information sheets re Dow Corning MB50-313 composition, Jan. 15, 2001 (2pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com).
Dow Corning Product Information sheets re Dow Corning MB50-314 composition, Jan. 15, 2001 (2pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com).
Dow Corning, Dow Corning MB50-011 Masterbatch Product Information, Ultra-high molecular weight siloxane polymer dispersed in nylon 6, 1999, 5 pages.
Dow Corning, Dow Corning MB50-011 Masterbatch Product Information, Ultra-high molecular weight siloxane polymer dispersed in polyamide 6, 1997-2001, 4 pages.
EI Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Flyer entitled “Teflon”, (Aug. 14, 2003) (1p) (http://www.dupont.com).
Encore Wire Corporation v. Southwire Company, LLC, Oral Arguments can be retrieved from <http://oralarguments.cafc.uscourts.gov/default.aspx?fl=2015-1249.mp3>, Appeals from United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 2014-000135 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2015-1249, -1250, Oct. 7, 2015.
Encore Wire Corporation, Corrected Joint Appendix in Encore Wire Corporation v. Southwire Company, LLC, Appeals from United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 2014-000135 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2015-1249, -1250, Jul. 28, 2015, 427 pages.
Encore Wire Corporation, Notice of Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Nov. 26, 2014, 9 pages, U.S.
Encore Wire Corporation, Opening Brief of Appellant in Encore Wire Corporation v. Southwire Company, LLC, Appeals from United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 2014-000135 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2015-1249, -1250, Mar. 10, 2015, 84 pages.
Encore Wire Corporation, Replacement Request for Ex Parte Reexamination Statements for U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 90/009,592), Nov. 17, 2009, 50 pages, U.S.
Encore Wire Corporation, Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Oct. 8, 2010, 91 pages, U.S.
Encore Wire Corporation, Reply and Response Brief of Appellant/Cross-Appellee in Encore Wire Corporation v. Southwire Company, LLC, Appeals from United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No.2014-000135 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2015-1249, -1250, Jun. 11, 2015, 41 pages.
Encore Wire Corporation, Request for Ex Parte Examination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 90/009,592), Oct. 7, 2009, 161 pages, U.S.
Encore Wire Corporation, Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Sep. 23, 2010, 92 pages, U.S.
Encore Wire Corporation, Request for Rehearing in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Apr. 22, 2014, 7 pages, U.S.
Encore Wire Corporation, Response Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Jan. 25, 2013, 53 pages, U.S.
Encore Wire Corporation, Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Mar. 2, 2011, 51 pages, U.S.
Encore Wire, Inc., Exhibits 1-9 (Claim Charts) of Corrected Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. §§1.193 (Control No. 95/000,573); Oct. 8, 2010; pp. 1-137 (US).
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report for Application No. 06739714.1, dated Nov. 12, 2009, 11 pages, The Netherlands.
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report for Application No. 06770960.0, dated Aug. 21, 2008, 5 pages, The Netherlands.
European Patent Office, Minutes of Oral Proceeding for Application No. 06770960.0, Jun. 25, 2012, 5 pages, The Netherlands.
European Patent Office, Office Action for Application No. 06739714.1, dated Aug. 25, 2011, 5 pages, The Netherlands.
European Patent Office, Office Action for Application No. 06739714.1, dated Feb. 5, 2013, 9 pages, The Netherlands.
European Patent Office, Office Action for Application No. 06739714.1, dated Jun. 26, 2013, 5 pages, The Netherlands.
European Patent Office, Third Party Observations for Application No. 06739714.1, May 21, 2012, 237 pages, The Netherlands.
European Patent Office, Third Party Observations for Application No. 06770960.0, Apr. 19, 2012, 231 pages, The Netherlands.
Examination Report for New Zealand Application No. 564551, dated Aug. 14, 2009.
General Electric Company, Brochure entitled “GE Silicones—Fluids, Emulsions & Specialties”, (2001) (19pp).
Howard & Howard letter to Mr. Thomas C. Wright dated Feb. 7, 2008 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/675,441 (2pp) (US).
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2005/005165, dated Jan. 16, 2007, 6 pages, the International Bureau of WIPO, Switzerland.
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2006/011069, dated Nov. 30, 2007, 7 pages, the International Bureau of WIPO, Switzerland.
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2006/019923, dated Nov. 30, 2007, 8 pages, the International Bureau of WIPO, Switzerland.
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2010/027684, dated Sep. 20, 2011, 8 pages, the International Bureau of WIPO, Switzerland.
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US05/05251, dated Mar. 14, 2006, 4 pages, United States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S.A.
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2006/010929, dated Nov. 30, 2007, 4 pages, United States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S.A.
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US05/05165, dated Dec. 20, 2005, 8 pages, United States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S.
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US06/11069, dated Aug. 21, 2006, 8 pages, United States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S.
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US06/19923, dated Oct. 20, 2006, 9 pages, United States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S.
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US10/27684, dated May 17, 2010, 8 pages, United States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S.
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US05/05251, dated Jul. 5, 2005, 4 pages, United States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S.A.
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US06/11070, dated Dec. 27, 2006, 7 pages, United States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S.A.
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US06/10929, dated Aug. 1, 2006, 4 pages, United States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S.A.
Kaufman, S., et al., “A PVC jacket compound with improved flame retardancy and superior physical properties”, Wire Technology, pp. 44-50, 7/8:75, (paper presented at the 23rd international Wire & Cable Symposium in Atlantic City, Dec. 1974).
Marquis, et al., “An Introduction to Fatty Acid Amide Slip and Anti-Block Agents”, Polymers, Laminations & Coatings Conference in San Francisco, CA. from Aug. 30 to Sep. 3, 1998, pp. 941-952, Tappi Press.
Office Action for Co-Pending Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-513468, dated Dec. 20, 2011, 5 pages. (Translation only).
Office Action for Co-Pending Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-150174, dated Jul. 22, 2014, 11 pages.
Office Action for Co-Pending Patent Application No. 88656 in Panama dated Oct. 6, 2011, 2 pgs.
Opposition to European Patent EP 1899988 and accompanying documentation, filed with EPO on Oct. 22, 2013, 23 pages.
Polywater® J specification, Lubrifiant Haute Performance, American Polywater Corporation, Aug. 2010, 4 pages.
Ryan, K. J., et al., “Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Functional Siloxane Additives in Polymers. Effects on Processing and Properties,” Vinyl & Additive Technology, Mar. 2000, vol. 6, No. , 13 pages.
Southwire Company and Cerro Wire LLC, (Joint) Stipulated Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Appeal in Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire LLC, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit No. 2016-2643 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129, Control/Application No. 95/000,403), Jan. 26, 2017, 7 pages.
Southwire Company and Cerro Wire, Inc., Joint Appendix in Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Case No. 2016-2287 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301, Control/Application No. 95/000,696), Feb. 17, 2017, 323 pages.
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc., Answer to Complaint for Patent Infringement and Demand for Jury Trial, Civil Action No. 3:08-cv-92-JTC, U.S.D.C., Northern District of Georgia, Newnan Division, Oct. 16, 2008, 8 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc., Defendant Cerro Wire Inc.'s Motion to Stay Pending Reexmination of the Patent-In-Suit, Civil Action No. 3:08-cv-92-JTC, U.S.D.C., Northern District of Georgia, Newnan Division, Dec. 12, 2008, 11 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc., Defendant Cerro Wire, Inc.'s Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Cerro's Invalidity Defenses Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, Civil Action No. 3:08-cv-92-JTC, U.S.D.C., Northern District of Georgia, Newnan Division, Jan. 16, 2009, 7 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc., Defendant Cerro Wire's Reply Memorandum in Support of Its Motion to Stay Pending Reexmination of the Patent-In-Suit, Civil Action No. 3:08-cv-92-JTC, U.S.D.C., Northern District of Georgia, Newnan Division, Jan. 16, 2009, 17 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc., Motion to Dismiss Cerro Wire Inc.'s Defenses of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, Civil Action No. 3:08-cv-92-JTC, U.S.D.C., Northern District of Georgia, Newnan Division, Jan. 2, 2009, 19 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc., Order to Stay Pending Reexamination of the Patent in Suit, Civil Action No. 3:08-cv-92-JTC, U.S.D.C., Northern District of Georgia, Newnan Division, May 12, 2009, 13 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc., Southwire Company's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Cerro Wire Inc.'s Defenses of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 and Further Opposition to Cerro Wire Inc.'s Motion for Stay Pending Reexamination of the Patent in Suit, Civil Action No. 3:08-cv-92-JTC, U.S.D.C., Northern District of Georgia, Newnan Division, Jan. 26, 2009, 16 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc., Southwire's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Stay Pending Reexamination of the Patent-In-Suit, Civil Action No. 3:08-cv-92-JTC, U.S.D.C., Northern District of Georgia, Newnan Division, Jan. 2, 2009, 79 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc., Complaint for Patent Infringement and Demand for Jury Trial (with Exhibit A), Civil Action No. 3:08-cv-92-JTC, U.S.D.C., Northern District of Georgia, Newnan Division, Aug. 12, 2008, 16 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company v. Encore Wire Corporation and Cerro Wire Inc., Plaintiff's Answer to Encore Wire Corporation's First Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims, Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-289-LED, U.S.D.C., Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, Feb. 12, 2010, 17 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company v. Encore Wire Corporation and Cerro Wire Inc., Plaintiff's Opening Claim Construction Brief, Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-289-LED, U.S.D.C., Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, Sep. 7, 2010, 103 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company v. Encore Wire Corporation and Cerro Wire Inc., Joint Claim Construction Chart, Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-289-LED, U.S.D.C., Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, Oct. 7, 2010, 11 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company v. Encore Wire Corporation and Cerro Wire Inc., Plaintiff's Claim Construction Reply Brief, Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-289-LED, U.S.D.C., Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, Oct. 7, 2010, 67 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Amended Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Apr. 30, 2010, 19 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Dec. 31, 2012, 67 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Jan. 28, 2013, 120 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Aug. 5, 2013, 63 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Dec. 10, 2014, 34 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), May 21, 2014, 134 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Appellant's Rebuttal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Aug. 16, 2013, 14 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Appellant's Request for Rehearing Following a Decision on Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Oct. 29, 2015, 20 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Applicant's Request for Further Processing of European Application No. 06739714.1, Mar. 7, 2011, 16 pages, Germany.
Southwire Company, Applicant's Response in European Application No. 06739714.1, Jun. 25, 2012, 27 pages, Germany.
Southwire Company, Applicant's Response in European Application No. 06739714.1, Jun. 14, 2013, 15 pages, Germany.
Southwire Company, Applicant's Response in European Application No. 06770960.0, Sep. 29, 2009, 9 pages, Germany.
Southwire Company, Applicant's Response in European Application No. 06739714.1, Feb. 13, 2014, 12 pages, Germany.
Southwire Company, Confirmation of Hearing by Appellant in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Jun. 29, 2015, 5 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Corrected Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Jun. 30, 2014, 133 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Corrected Response in Ex Parte Examination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 90/009,589), Jun. 7, 2010, 12 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Corrected Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Apr. 26, 2011, 85 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Cross-Respondent Patent Owner's Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. Nos. 95/000,403), Sep. 13, 2010, 23 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, LLC v. Cerro Wire LLC, Oral Arguments can be retrieved from <http://oralarguments.cafc.uscourts.govidefault.aspx?fl=2015-1117.mp3>, Appeals from United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 2014-005956 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2015-1117, -1118, Oct. 7, 2015.
Southwire Company, LLC, Joint Appendix in Southwire Company, LLC v. Cerro Wire LLC, Appeal from United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 2014-005956 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2015-1117, -1118, May 18, 2015, 289 pages.
Southwire Company, LLC, Notice of Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 B2 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Sep. 13, 2016, 3 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, LLC, Principal and Response Brief of Cross-Appellant in Encore Wire Corporation v. Southwire Company, LLC, Appeal from United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 2014-000135 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2015-1249, -1250, Apr. 23, 2015, 70 pages.
Southwire Company, LLC, Reply Brief of Cross-Appellant in Encore Wire Corporation v. Southwire Company, LLC, Appeal from United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 2014-000135 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2015-1249, -1250, Jun. 25, 2015, 25 pages.
Southwire Company, LLC, Response and Reply Brief of Appellant in Southwire, LLC v. Cerro Wire LLC, Appeal from United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 2014-005956 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2015-1117, -1118, Apr. 21, 2015, 60 pages.
Southwire Company, LLC, Response to Decision on Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Feb. 16, 2018, 286 pages, U.S.A.
Southwire Company, Notice of Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Mar. 21, 2014, 10 page, U.S.
Southwire Company, Notice of Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Nov. 26, 2012, 5 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Notice of Appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Sep. 19, 2014, 6 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Notice of Election to Participate and Notice of Cross-Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Jan. 2, 2015, 14 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Opening Brief in Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Case No. 2016-2287 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301, Control/Application No. 95/000,696), Oct. 14, 2016, 131 pages.
Southwire Company, Opening Brief of Appellant in Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc., Appeal from United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 2014-005956, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 15/1117, -1118, Dec. 29, 2014, 63 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Patent Owner Comments on Request for Rehearing and Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 41.3 to Strike Requester's Improper Paper in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Mar. 16, 2018, 53 pages, U.S.A.
Southwire Company, Patent Owner's Agenda for Interview with the Examiner for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,518 (U.S. Appl. No. 96/000,144), Apr. 28, 2017, 9 pages, U.S.A.
Southwire Company, Patent Owner's Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. Nos. 95/000,403), Sep. 13, 2010, 30 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Patent Owner's Response to Non-Final Office Action, including Written Statement of May 3, 2017 Interview in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,518 (U.S. Appl. No. 96/000,144), May 22, 2017, 343 pages, U.S.A.
Southwire Company, Patent Owner's Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,872, dated Mar. 17, 2017, 11 pages, U.S.A.
Southwire Company, Patent Owner's Response to Request for Rehearing in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), May 22, 2014, 5 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Patent Owner's Response, including Terminal Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,518 (U.S. Appl. No. 96/000,144), Sep. 14, 2017, 33 pages, U.S.A.
Southwire Company, Patent Owner's Written Statement of an Interview with the Examiner for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,518 (U.S. Appl. No. 96/000,144), Dec. 2, 2016, 12 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Petition in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Jan. 28, 2013, 14 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Rebuttal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Jan. 6, 2014, 16 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Rebuttal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Mar. 4, 2015, 6 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Reply Brief of the Appellant in Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Case No. 2016-2287 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301, Control/Application No. 95/000,696), Feb. 10, 2017, 37 pages.
Southwire Company, Reply in U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,222, Dec. 8, 2008, 17 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Reply in for U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,222, Dec. 12, 2008, 12 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Reply to Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,052, dated Nov. 19, 2012, 23 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Reply to Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,052, dated Dec. 19, 2012, 5 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Reply to Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/774,677, dated Jul. 29, 2013, 24 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Reply to Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/144,150, dated Feb. 17, 2015, 11 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Reply to Notice of Opposition in European Application No. 06770960.0, Jun. 9, 2014, 109 pages, Germany.
Southwire Company, Request for Oral Hearing in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Oct. 28, 2014, 5 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Respondent Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Jan. 9, 2015, 25 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response (Petition to Reopen and Request to Proposed Amendment) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Oct. 17, 2012, 66 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Ex Parte Examination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 90/009,589), Jun. 4, 2010, 79 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 90/009,592), Jul. 8, 2010, 6 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 90/009,592), Oct. 25, 2010, 76 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. Nos. 90/009,589 and 90/009,592), Dec. 16, 2010, 10 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. Nos. 90/009,589 and 90/009,592), Aug. 10, 2011, 21 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Feb. 5, 2009, 104 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Sep. 1, 2009, 27 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Apr. 29, 2010, 39 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Jun. 30, 2010, 5 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Jul. 31, 2010, 8 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Sep. 9, 2010, 8 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Jan. 30, 2015, 22 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Feb. 3, 2011, 50 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Apr. 11, 2011, 78 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), May 16, 2013, 163 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Apr. 14, 2014, 37 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Sep. 29, 2014, 7 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Feb. 11, 2013, 146 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Dec. 6, 2013, 19 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Sep. 10, 2012, 67 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Decision on Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Feb. 28, 2014, 151 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Non-final Office Action for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,518 (U.S. Appl. No. 96/000,144), dated Nov. 8, 2016, 104 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/497,586, dated Nov. 8, 2012, 9 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Notice to File Corrected Papers for U.S. Appl. No. 12/497,586, Nov. 16, 2012, 12 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Nov. 2, 2017 Non-Final Office Action and Terminal Disclaimer for U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,881, dated May 2, 2018, 44 pages, U.S.A.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, dated Dec. 12, 2006, 14 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, dated May 14, 2007, 20 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, dated Jul. 11, 2007, 27 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, dated Aug. 9, 2007, 19 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, dated Sep. 14, 2007, 7 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, dated Feb. 15, 2008, 9 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,487, dated Dec. 9, 2005, 8 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,487, dated Apr. 28, 2006, 16 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/135,807, dated Apr. 27, 2006, 14 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/135,986, dated Jan. 12, 2007, 14 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/675,441, dated Jun. 30, 2008, 47 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/675,441, dated Apr. 6, 2009, 15 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/675,441, dated Sep. 4, 2009, 12 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/675,441, dated Mar. 24, 2010, 18 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/858,766, dated Dec. 9, 2008, 13 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,222, dated Oct. 21, 2008, 26 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/497,586, dated Jan. 9, 2012, 21 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/497,586, dated May 30, 2012, 15 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/787,877, dated Apr. 28, 2011, 44 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,052, dated May 23, 2012, 14 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Oct. 21, 2008, 28 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Respondent's Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Jul. 3, 2014, 10 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Response to Respondent's Rebuttal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Sep. 29, 2014, 6 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Supplemental Response in Ex Parte Examination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 90/009,589), Jun. 11, 2010, 13 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Supplemental Response in Ex Parte Examination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 90/009,589), Sep. 22, 2010, 47 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Supplemental Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,052, dated Jul. 16, 2012, 37 pages, U.S.
Southwire Company, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant's Opening Brief in Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire LLC, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit No. 2016-2643 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129, Control/Application No. 95/000,403), Dec. 7, 2016, 8 pages.
Southwire, “Romex® SlMpull® Type NM-B”, Product Specifications, retrieved from <http://www.southwire.com/products/RomexSIMpullTypeNMBOEM.htm> on Mar. 12, 2015.
Thermoplastic-Insulated Wires and Cables, UL 83, In CSA Standards Update Service, Thirteenth Edition, Nov. 15, 2003, 186 pages.
Translation of Submission of Oct. 22, 2013 from IPSILON to the EPO; Re: Opposition to European Patent EP 1899988, 21 pages.
Trotignon, J. P., et al., “Extrusion des Thermoplastiques, in Matieres Plastiques,” Editons Nathan, 1996, p. 148.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/544,224, filed Feb. 12, 2004, Carlson et al., 6 pp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Opinion (PTAB Affirmed) in Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Case No. 2016-2287 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301, Control/Application No. 95/000,696), Sep. 8, 2017, 11 pages.
UL Standard for Safety for Nonmetallic-Sheathed Cables, UL 719, Twelfth Edition, Feb. 9, 2006.
Ultra-X TM, Une nouvelle dimension dans les cables NMD-7, ultra-X product brochure, Northern Telecom—Power Cable Division, Apr. 11, 1977, 28 pages.
Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Standard for Safety UL-719 for Nonmetallic-Sheathed Cables, Eleventh Edition, Mar. 21, 2002, 46 pages.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Order (Dismissing Proceeding) in Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire LLC, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit No. 2016-2643 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129, Control/Application No. 95/000,403), Jan. 27, 2017, 2 pages.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Order on Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc—Denied—in Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, LLC, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Case No. 2016-2287, Dec. 5, 2017, 2 pages.
United States Court of Appeals, Encore Wire Corporation v. Southwire Company, LLC, Order (Dismissed), Appeals from United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 2014-000135 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2015-1249, -1250, Oct. 20, 2015, 2 pages.
United States Court of Appeals, Southwire Company, LLC v. Cerro Wire, LLC, Judgment (Affirmed), Appeals from United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 2014-005956 (relating to U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2015-1117, -1118, Oct. 20, 2015, 2 pages.
United States Patent and Trade Mark Office, Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Jul. 9, 2012, 59 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trade Mark Office, Board Decision, Examiner Affirmed in Part in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Mar. 28, 2014, 20 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trade Mark Office, Board Decision, Reconsideration Denied in Part in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Nov. 3, 2014, 5 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trade Mark Office, Examiner's Answer in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Jul. 16, 2013, 3 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trade Mark Office, Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), dated Dec. 3, 2010, 12 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trade Mark Office, Office Communication in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), dated Sep. 4, 2013, 3 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trade Mark Office, Order Granting Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Nov. 9, 2010, 22 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trade Mark Office, Petition Decisions in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Apr. 4, 2013, Jun. 19, 2013, and Jun. 21, 2013, 25 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trade Mark Office, Right of Appeal Notice in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Sep. 28, 2012, 58 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Aug. 10, 2012, 166 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Action Closing Prosecution for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Jul. 2, 2014, 104 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Closing Action for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 and Office Action (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), dated Jul. 1, 2009, 41 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Closing Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Nov. 6, 2013, 81 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Decision on Examiner's Determination (Affirmed) in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 B2 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Jul. 13, 2016, 20 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Decision to Merge Proceedings in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. Nos. 90/009,589 and 90/009,592), Nov. 23, 2010, 10 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Decision Vacating Reexam in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Aug. 2, 2016, 6 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Decision: Rehearing Granted in Part, in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), May 2, 2016, 17 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Electronic Approval of Terminal Disclaimer for U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,881, May 2, 2018, 1 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Ex Parte Reexamination Ordered of U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,518 (U.S. Appl. No. 96/000,144), Sep. 8, 2016, 2 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate for Application/Control No. 96/000,144 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,518), Jan. 26, 2018, 2 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Examiner's Answer in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Dec. 4, 2013, 3 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Examiner's Answer in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Feb. 4, 2015, 3 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Examiner's Answer in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Aug. 28, 2014, 3 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Sep. 21, 2012, 12 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Examiner's Determination on Patent Owner and Requester Comments after Board Decision in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Dec. 30, 2014, 15 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Examiner's Ex Parte Reexamination Interview Summary for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,518 (U.S. Appl. No. 96/000,144), dated Jan. 9, 2017, 3 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,518 (U.S. Appl. No. 96/000,144), dated Jul. 14, 2017, 74 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Interview Attachment (Miscellaneous Internal Document) in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,518 (U.S. Appl. No. 96/000,144), May 3, 2017, 14 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Issuance of Supplemental Examination Certificate U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,518 F1 (U.S. Appl. No. 96/000,144), Aug. 16, 2016, 2 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Miscellaneous Action with SSP for U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, Mar. 4, 2008, 9 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, dated Oct. 12, 2007, 8 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark.Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, dated Dec. 31, 2007, 9 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, dated Mar. 25, 2008, 12 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, dated Apr. 30, 2008, 11 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, dated Jun. 27, 2008, 9 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/675,441, dated Apr. 6, 2010, 10 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,222, dated Dec. 5, 2008, 17 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,222, dated Jan. 8, 2009, 15 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,222, dated Feb. 27, 2009, 11 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/497,586, dated Aug. 8, 2012, 24 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/497,586, dated Nov. 18, 2013, 17 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/787,877, dated Aug. 3, 2011, 9 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,052, dated Aug. 17, 2012, 22 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,052, dated Dec. 12, 2012, 16 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/774,677, dated Apr. 30, 2013, 9 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/774,677, dated Aug. 21, 2013, 21 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/144,150, dated Nov. 18, 2014, 24 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/144,150, dated May 22, 2015, 6 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,150, dated Jul. 19, 2016, 48 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,872, dated Apr. 12, 2017, 8 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Hearing in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301, (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Jun. 8, 2015, 4 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Intent to Issue Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Jul. 12, 2013, 14 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Intent to Issue Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594) and Office Action, dated Jun. 7, 2016, 7 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Intent to Issue an Ex Parte Reexam Certificate for Application/Control No. 96/000,144, Oct. 10, 2017, 7 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Intent to Reissue in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. Nos. 90/009,589 and 90/009,592) Sep. 21, 2011, 8 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notificaiton of Reopening Prosecution Due to Information Disclosure Statement Filed after of a Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,872, dated Feb. 8, 2018, 6 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,872, dated Dec. 22, 2016, 5 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, dated Jul. 12, 2006, 17 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, dated Mar. 14, 2007, 12 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, dated May 30, 2007, 8 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, dated Aug. 7, 2007, 12 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,487, dated Nov. 2, 2005, 6 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,487, dated Jan. 5, 2006, 10 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,487, dated Jun. 8, 2006, 15 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/135,807, dated Dec. 15, 2005, 10 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/135,807, dated Jun. 8, 2006, 15 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/135,986, dated Jul. 12, 2006, 10 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/135,986, dated Mar. 14, 2007, 11 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/313,596, dated Mar. 20, 2007, 16 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,820, dated Jun. 11, 2009, 10 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/675,441, dated Dec. 28, 2007, 5 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/675,441, dated Oct. 6, 2008, 13 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/675,441, dated Jun. 25, 2009, 11 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/675,441, dated Dec. 9, 2009, 6 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/858,766, dated Jun. 9, 2008, 8 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/858,766, dated Feb. 9, 2009, 11 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,222, dated Aug. 7, 2008, 16 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/497,586, dated Jul. 7, 2011, 6 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/497,586, dated Mar. 30, 2012, 20 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/787,877, dated Oct. 28, 2010, 13 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,052, dated Nov. 23, 2011, 8 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/620,963, dated Apr. 6, 2016, 16 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,872, dated Sep. 9, 2016, 52 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,881, dated Nov. 2, 2017, 11 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for Ex Parte Reexam of U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,518 (U.S. Appl. No. 96/000,144), dated Sep. 8, 2016, 36 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), dated Feb. 14, 2014, 116 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in Ex Parte Examination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 90/009,589), dated May 4, 2010, 31 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 90/009,592), dated Sep. 24, 2010, 16 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. Nos. 90/009,589 and 90/009,592), dated Jun. 23, 2011, 24 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,518 (U.S. Appl. No. 96/000,144), dated Mar. 20, 2017, 149 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Order Granting Ex Parte Examination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 90/009,589), Dec. 18, 2009, 20 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Order Granting Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 90/009,592), Feb. 5, 2010, 12 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Order Granting Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 and Office Action (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), dated Dec. 5, 2008, 50 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Order Granting Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594) and Office Action, dated Feb. 11, 2011, 46 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Order Granting Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695) and Office Action, dated Nov. 13, 2012, 74 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Order Granting Reexamination and Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), dated Dec. 11, 2012, 43 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Board Decision on Appeal Affirming Examiner in Part for Application/Control No. 95/000,695, Jan. 16, 2018, 37 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Board Decision—Examiner Affirmed in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Jul. 16, 2014, 20 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Board Decision, Examiner Affirmed In-Part in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Jan. 31, 2014, 24 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Board Remand to Examiner in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Jun. 13, 2014, 9 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Petition Decision in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), May 27, 2010, 6 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Petition Decision in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Jul. 7, 2010, 6 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Petition Decision in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Feb. 26, 2014, 4 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Petition Decision—Dismissed in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Nov. 20, 2012, 7 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Petition Decisions in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Aug. 10-11, 2010, 12 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Petition Decisions in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Oct. 19 and 22, 2010, 17 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Prioritized Examination Granted for U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,150, Jun. 16, 2016, 5 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Proceeding Forwarded to Patent Trial and Appeal Board Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Mar. 23, 2015, 3 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, PTAB Decision on Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Sep. 29, 2015, 28 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, PTAB Docketing Notice in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Jun. 2, 2016, 3 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, PTAB Docketing Notice Transmitted to Third Party Requestor in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Jun. 2, 2016, 5 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Reasons for Substantial New Question of Patentability Determination for U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,518 (U.S. Appl. No. 96/000,144), Aug. 16, 2016, 32 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Record of Oral Hearing Held: Aug. 19, 2015 in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Sep. 15, 2015, 44 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Reexam Petition Decision—Granted in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Oct. 25, 2013, 8 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Reexamination Certificate Issued for U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. Nos. 90/009,589 and 90/009,592), Dec. 27, 2011, 4 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Right of Appeal Notice in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Oct. 25, 2012, 162 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Right of Appeal Notice Prosecution for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,695), Aug. 28, 2014, 7 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Right of Notice of Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,403), Mar. 30, 2010, 23 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Right of Notice to Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Jan. 17, 2014, 83 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Right of Notice to Appeal in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,696), Feb. 19, 2014, 87 pages, U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Summary of Applicant Initiated Interview for U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,881, Apr. 6, 2018, 4 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,052, dated Jan. 11, 2013, 3 pages, U.S.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/666,105, Preliminary Amendment Claims, Mar. 23, 2015, 5 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,872, Preliminary Amendment Claims, Sep. 18, 2015, 6 pages.
Wild, Frank, “The Effects of Silicone Polymer Additions on the Processing and Properties of an Isotactic Propylene Homopolymer”, Dissertation, Sep. 1995, The Manchester Metropolitan University.
Wiles, John, “Clarifying Confusing Cables”, Home Power #66, Aug./Sep. 1998, pp. 82-84.
Witco Corporation, Brochure entitled “Fatty Acids, Glycerine, Triglycerides”, (1997) (22pp).
Yellow 77® document, Ideal Industries GmbH, 1 pg., 2003.
Cerro Wire, Inc., Requestor Reply to PO Comments to Examiner Determination, for Control No. 95/000,695, Jan. 14, 2019, 16 pages.
Southwire Company, Patent Owner's Reply to Reqestor's Comments In Response to Examiners' Determination, for Control No. 95/000,695, Jan. 15, 2019, 20 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board Docketing Notice, for Control No. 95/000,694, Feb. 5, 2019, 3 pages, USA.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Transmittal of Communication of Third Party Requester Inter Partes Reexamination, for Control No. 95/000,695, Feb. 5, 2019, 5 pages, USA.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Status Inquiry, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,872, Feb. 14, 2019, 3 pages, USA.
Electronic Petition Request of Terminal Disclaimer, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,872, Apr. 30, 2019, 3 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Electronic Approval of Terminal Discliamer for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,872, Apr. 30, 2019, 1 page, USA.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,881, dated Apr. 4, 2019, 20 pages, USA.
Electronic Petition Request for Terminal Disclaimer, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,881, Apr. 30, 2019, 2 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Electronic Approval of Terminal Disclaimer for U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,881, Apr. 30, 2019, 1 page, USA.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,716, Amendment, dated Feb. 19, 2019, 39 pages.
Electronic Petition Request for Terminal Disclaimer, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,716, Apr. 30, 2019, 3 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Electronic Approval of Terminal Disclaimer for U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,716, Apr. 30, 2019, 1 page, USA.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Applicant Initiated Interview Summary, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,716, dated Apr. 30, 2019, 3 pages, USA.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Applicant Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,872, dated Oct. 2, 2018, 5 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Examiner's Determination on Patent Owner's Response for Control No. 95/000,695, Oct. 11, 2018, 23 pages, U.S.A.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,881, dated Sep. 5, 2018, 61 pages, U.S.A.
Cerro Wire Inc., Requestor Comments in Response to Examiner's Determination after Board Decision for Control No. 95/000,695, Dec. 13, 2018, 18 pages, USA.
Southwire Company, Patent Owner's Comments in Response to Examiner's Determination after Board Decision for Control No. 95/000,695, Dec. 14, 2018, 26 pages, USA.
Southwire Company, Response to Jun. 14, 2018 Non-Final Office Action, including Affidavits, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,872, dated Nov. 14, 2018, 41 pages, USA.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Examiner's Determination after Board Decision for Control No. 95/000,695, Nov. 14, 2018, 23 pages, USA.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,716, dated Nov. 16, 2018, 70 pages, USA.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,716, dated Nov. 7, 2019, (33 pages). U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, NonFinal Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,881, dated Nov. 29, 2019, (14 pages). U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, NonFinal Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,872, dated Nov. 29, 2019, (19 pages), U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Decision on Examiner's Determination Under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(d), for ReExamination Control No. 95/000,695, Aug. 1, 2019, (16 pages), USA.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Panel Decision From Pre-Appeal Brief Review for U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,881, dated Sep. 3, 2019, (2pages). USA.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,881, filed May 9, 2017, 2017-0243674 A1, Pending.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/144,150, filed Dec. 30, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,142,336, Patented.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/774,677, filed Feb. 22, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,616,918, Patented.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,052, filed Oct. 14, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,518, Patented.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/787,877, filed May 26, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119, Patented.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/675,441, filed Feb. 15, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024, Patented.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,487, filed May 3, 2005, 2006-0065430 A1, Abandoned.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, filed Sep. 28, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129, Patented.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Decision on Request for Rehearing, Appeal 2019-002436, Reexamination Control 95/000,695, Technology Center 3900, U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,119, dated Jul. 1, 2020, (31 pages), U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,716, dated Jun. 17, 2020, (1 page), U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,881, dated Jun. 24, 2020, (1 page), U.S.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,872, dated Jul. 8 2020, (1 page), U.S.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180301240 A1 Oct 2018 US
Continuations (7)
Number Date Country
Parent 15590881 May 2017 US
Child 16015688 US
Parent 14858872 Sep 2015 US
Child 15590881 US
Parent 14144150 Dec 2013 US
Child 14858872 US
Parent 13774677 Feb 2013 US
Child 14144150 US
Parent 13274052 Oct 2011 US
Child 13774677 US
Parent 12787877 May 2010 US
Child 13274052 US
Parent 11675441 Feb 2007 US
Child 12787877 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 11120487 May 2005 US
Child 11675441 US
Parent 10952294 Sep 2004 US
Child 11120487 US