The present invention relates to electrical cables, more particularly to THHN electrical cables, and even more particularly to methods for reducing the surface coefficient of friction and required installation pulling force thereof, as well as preferred pulling lubricant compositions for effecting such reductions.
Electrical cables include a conductor core and typically include an outer jacket or sheath. The term “sheath,” as used herein and throughout the specification and claims, is defined to mean the outermost protective jacket or covering surrounding a conductor core, whether of a single type material or multiple layers of the same or different material. The conductor core may typically be, for example, a single metal wire, multiple small wires twisted together to make a “stranded” cable, or multiple insulated wires or other type electrical conductors acting together to serve a particular function (e.g., three-phase connection). The sheath may comprise one or more layers of polymeric or other material to provide physical, mechanical, electrical insulating and/or chemical protection for the underlying cable components. For the purpose of type THHN cable of the present invention, the exterior portion of the sheath is of nylon. Specifically, type THHN cable comprises a conductor core of a single solid or stranded conductor, surrounded by a layer of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) electrical insulation, covered by an outer layer of nylon.
Installation of electrical cable often requires that it be pulled through tight spaces or small openings in, and in engagement with, narrow conduits, raceways, cabletrays, or passageways in rafters or joists. This becomes problematic since the exterior surface of the cable sheath normally has a high coefficient of friction, therefore requiring a large pulling force. Moreover, installation parameters include maximum allowable cable pulling tension and/or sidewall pressure limits. Exceeding these limits can result in degradation of the cable, physical damage and inferior installation.
To overcome this problem, the general industry practice has been to coat the exterior surface of the cable sheath with a pulling lubricant at the job site in order to reduce the coefficient of friction between this surface and the conduit walls or like surfaces, typically using vaselines or lubricants produced specifically, and well known in the industry for such purpose, such as Yellow 77® (hereinafter, “Y 77”). The term “pulling lubricant,” as used herein and throughout the specification and claims, is defined to mean lubricating material which sufficiently reduces the coefficient of friction of the exterior surface of the sheath of the cable to facilitate the pulling of the cable.
The aforementioned industry practice of applying a pulling lubricant like Y 77 to the finished cable at the job site poses problems, principally due to the additional time, expense and manpower required to lubricate the finished cable surface at the job site as well as to clean up after the lubricating process is completed. Alternative solutions have been tried but are generally unsuccessful, including the extrusion of a lubricant layer over the extruded polymeric sheath during the manufacturing of the cable, or the application of granules of material to the still-hot sheath during the extrusion process, which granules are designed to become detached when the cable is pulled through the duct. However, these solutions not only require major alterations of the manufacturing line, but result in a loss in manufacturing time, increased economic costs, and undesirable fluctuations in the geometrical dimensions of the cable sheaths.
It is also important to an understanding of the present invention to know the difference between what are referred to as “pulling lubricants” and what are “processing lubricants.” A pulling lubricant is a lubricant that appears at the outside surface of the sheath of the cable and is effective to lower the surface coefficient of friction such as to reduce the force necessary to pull the cable along or through building surfaces or enclosures. A processing lubricant is lubricating material that is used to facilitate the cable manufacturing process, such as the flow of polymer chains during any polymer compounding as well as during the extrusion processes while the polymer is in its molten or melt phase. Cable manufacturers have long used processing lubricants, such as stearic acid or ethylene bis-stearamide wax, as a minor component of the polymeric compound from which the cable sheath is formed. Because a processing lubricant is normally not effective except when the polymer is in this melt phase, the effect of a processing lubricant is essentially non-existent in the final hardened polymer sheath of the cable. Even where there may be an excessive amount of the processing lubricant, a separate pulling lubricant would still be required to sufficiently reduce the cable sheaths' exterior surface coefficient of friction in order to minimize the pulling force necessary to install the cable.
Accordingly, there has been a long-felt need for an effective method of providing a pulling lubricant at the exterior surface of the finished cable, and particularly the finished THHN cable, which is effective to reduce the cable surface coefficient of friction and minimize the required installation pulling force, without incurring the inconvenience and time-consuming operation and expense associated with the application of the pulling lubricant at the installation site, nor significantly increasing the complexity and cost of the manufacturing process, nor undesirably altering the geometrical characteristics of the cable sheaths.
The process of the present invention accomplishes these objectives for THHN cable by a cable manufacturing process in which a particular pulling lubricant, of optimum weight percentage or quantity, is introduced into the manufacturing process at a particular stage of manufacture, which results in the pulling lubricant being present in the outer sheath, so that it is available to reduce the coefficient of friction of the exterior sheath surface when the cable is to be installed. Depending upon the material of the sheath and the type of lubricant, this may be as a consequence of the migration, or delayed migration or “blooming,” of the pulling lubricant to the sheath surface; or alternatively, due to the permeation of the pulling lubricant throughout the sheath. Under these circumstances, the pulling lubricant is effective to lower the surface coefficient of friction below that of the inherent coefficient of friction of the material from which the outer layer of the THHN sheath is formed, thereby reducing the required installation pulling force.
In accordance with the process of the invention, and as described below in greater detail, the pulling lubricant is selectively chosen to provide the optimum results with respect to the particular nylon sheath material, and may alternately be introduced into the THHN cable manufacturing process at various stages, ranging from the initial compounding of the lubricant with the polymeric nylon material to form lubricated pellets from which the sheath is to be formed, to mixing the lubricant with the nylon sheath material before introduction of the mixture into the extrusion process, to its introduction into the sheath extrusion process while the nylon sheath forming material is in its molten state.
These and other details and aspects of the invention, as well as the advantages thereof, will be more readily understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring initially to
As is therefore evident, the pulling lubricant can be mixed with the material from which the outer sheath is to be extruded prior to extrusion or, alternatively, introduced into the extruding head for subsequent mixing with the molten extrusion material as the sheath is being formed. As a further alternative, the pulling lubricant can be initially compounded with the polymeric material of the pellets themselves in a process upstream of that depicted in
Polymeric materials that can be used for an insulating layer or outer sheath of different type of cable include polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinylchloride, organic polymeric thermosetting and thermoplastic resins and elastomers, polyolefins, copolymers, vinyls, olefin-vinyl copolymers, polyamides, acrylics, polyesters, fluorocarbons, and the like. As previously described, for the THHN cable of the present invention, the conductor core of a single solid or stranded conductor is surrounded by an insulating layer of PVC covered by an outer sheath of a polyamide (e.g., nylon).
In accordance with the testing subsequently described, it has been determined that, for THHN cable, silicone oil is the preferred pulling lubricant. For small gauge THHN wire, erucamide is an alternative preferred pulling lubricant, to be incorporated in the nylon sheath.
The efficacy of these pulling lubricants for the nylon sheath, and specifically an optimum range for the quantity of such lubricants, in accordance with the invention, has been proven by the use of various tests. Prior to discussing the results of such tests, these test methods and their equipment are described as follows:
Testing Method
Coefficient of Friction Test
Referring now to
The overall setup used a pulling rope threaded through ˜40′ of PVC conduit (appropriately sized for the cable being pulled) with two 90° bends. Three 100′ pieces of THHN cable were cut and laid out parallel to one another in line with the first straight section of conduit, and the rope connected to them using industry-standard practice. The other end of the THHN cable was attached to a metal cable which was wrapped around a cylinder with an air brake to allow the application of constant back tension on the setup.
The metal cable was threaded through a load cell so that it could be monitored in real-time, and continuously logged. The pulling rope was similarly threaded through a load cell and constantly monitored and logged. Values for both back tension and pulling tension were logged for the time it took to pull cable through the conduit run. These values were then averaged and used in the PolyWater program to calculate coefficient of friction.
Specific Type THHN Tests
Initial tests of small gauge Type THHN wire were performed using the small-scale tension tester shown in
Using the data obtained from the small scale pull test of
Next, large gauge Type THHN cable was tested. Using the coefficient of friction test of
In accordance with an advantage of the present invention, the pulling lubricant that is incorporated in the sheath is present at the outer surface of the sheath when the cable engages, or in response to the cable's engagement with, the duct or other structure through which the cable is to be pulled. For the THHN cable of the present invention, where the outer sheath is of nylon and the preferred pulling lubricant is high molecular weight silicone oil, this silicon-based lubricant permeates the entire nylon sheath portion and is, in effect, continuously squeezed to the sheath surface in what is referred to as the “sponge effect,” when the cable is pulled through the duct.
Compounding with Pulling Lubricant
As previously described, the pulling lubricant may be incorporated into the extruded sheath (or the outer layer of the cable sheath if the sheath is of multiple layers) by initially compounding the lubricant with the (outer) sheath material to be extruded. To prepare the lubricated blend of the present invention, the resin and additional components, including the pulling lubricant, are fed into any one of a number of commonly used compounding machines, such as a twin-screw compounding extruder, Buss kneader, Banbury mixer, two-roll mill, or other heated shear-type mixer. The melted, homogeneous blend is then extruded into strands or cut into strips that may be subsequently chopped into easily handled pellets. The so-prepared lubricated pellets are then fed into the extruder for forming the outer sheath.
THHN cable
THHN and THWN-2 are types of insulated electrical conductors that cover a broad range of wire sizes and applications. THHN or THWN-2 conductors are typically 600 volt copper conductors with a sheath comprising an outer layer of nylon surrounding a layer of thermoplastic insulation and are heat, moisture, oil, and gasoline resistant. THHN cable is primarily used in conduit and cable trays for services, feeders, and branch circuits in commercial or industrial applications as specified in the National Electrical Code and is suitable for use in dry locations at temperatures not to exceed 90° C. Type THWN-2 cable is suitable for use in wet or dry locations at temperatures not to exceed 90° C. or not to exceed 75° C. when exposed to oil or coolant. Type THHN or THWN-2 conductors are usually annealed (soft) copper, insulated with a tough, heat and moisture resistant polyvinylchloride (PVC), over which a polyamide layer, specifically nylon, is applied. Many cables, including those addressed by the present invention, can be “multi-rated,” simultaneously qualifying for rating as THHN or THWN-2.
Referring now to
Two industry-standard processes can be used to produce this product, the so called co-extrusion method and the tandem extrusion method. In both processes, the conductor, either solid or stranded, is first introduced into the extrusion head where the heated, melted PVC insulation compound is introduced and applied to the circumference of the conductor. In the co-extrusion process, the melted nylon compound is introduced into the same extrusion head and applied together with the PVC to the conductor, in a two-layer orientation. In the tandem process the PVC-coated conductor leaves the first extrusion head and is introduced into a second, separate extrusion head where the melted nylon is applied to the surface. In both cases, the final product is then introduced into a cooling water bath and ultimately the cooled product is wound onto reels. In either case, the nylon material is preferably initially compounded with the pulling lubricant to provide the so-lubricated extrusion pellets.
As shown in
Although the aforementioned description references specific embodiments and processing techniques of the invention, it is to be understood that these are only illustrative. For example, although the description has been with respect to electrical cable, it is also applicable to other types of non-electrical cable such as, for example, fiber optic cable. Additional modifications may be made to the described embodiments and techniques without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention as defined solely by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/787,877, filed May 26, 2010, now pending, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/675,441, filed Feb. 15, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024, issued Jul. 6, 2010, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/120,487, filed May 3, 2005, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/952,294, filed Sep. 28, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129, issued Aug. 12, 2008. Each patent application identified above is incorporated here by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2276437 | Vaala | Mar 1942 | A |
2685707 | Llewellyn et al. | Aug 1954 | A |
2930838 | Chizallet et al. | Mar 1960 | A |
3064073 | Downing | Nov 1962 | A |
3108981 | Clark et al. | Oct 1963 | A |
3191005 | Cox | Jun 1965 | A |
3258031 | French | Jun 1966 | A |
3378628 | Garner | Apr 1968 | A |
3433884 | Cogelia et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
3668175 | Sattler | Jun 1972 | A |
3849221 | Middleton | Nov 1974 | A |
3852875 | McAmis et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3868436 | Ootsuji et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3877142 | Hamano et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3885286 | Hill | May 1975 | A |
3936572 | MacKenzie, Jr. et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4002797 | Hacker et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4057956 | Tolle | Nov 1977 | A |
4099425 | Moore | Jul 1978 | A |
4100245 | Horikawa et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4137623 | Taylor | Feb 1979 | A |
4273806 | Stechler | Jun 1981 | A |
4274509 | Thomson et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4275096 | Taylor | Jun 1981 | A |
4299256 | Bacehowski et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4356139 | Rowland et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4360492 | Rowland et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4416380 | Flum | Nov 1983 | A |
4454949 | Flum | Jun 1984 | A |
4522733 | Jonnes | Jun 1985 | A |
4569420 | Pickett et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4605818 | Arroyo et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4673516 | Berry | Jun 1987 | A |
4684214 | Goldmann et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4693936 | McGregor et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4749059 | Jonnes et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4751261 | Miyata et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4806425 | Chu-Ba | Feb 1989 | A |
4937142 | Ogushi et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4952021 | Aoki et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4965249 | De With et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5036121 | Coaker et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5055522 | Ikeda et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5074640 | Hardin et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5225635 | Wake et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5227080 | Berry | Jul 1993 | A |
5252676 | Suyama et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5326638 | Mottine, Jr. et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5356710 | Rinehart | Oct 1994 | A |
5383799 | Fladung | Jan 1995 | A |
5460885 | Chu-Ba | Oct 1995 | A |
5505900 | Suwanda et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5561730 | Lochkovic et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5565242 | Buttrick, Jr. et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5614288 | Bustos | Mar 1997 | A |
5614482 | Baker et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5656371 | Kawahigashi et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5660932 | Durston et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5708084 | Hauerstein et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5733823 | Sugioka et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5753861 | Hansen et al. | May 1998 | A |
5852116 | Cree et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5856405 | Hofmann | Jan 1999 | A |
5886072 | Linsky et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5912436 | Sanchez et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5925601 | McSherry et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6057018 | Schmidt | May 2000 | A |
6064073 | Hoogenraad et al. | May 2000 | A |
6080489 | Mehta | Jun 2000 | A |
6114036 | Rinehart et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6137058 | Moe et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146699 | Bonicel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159617 | Foster et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160940 | Summers et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179665 | Rossman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188026 | Cope et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6228495 | Lupia et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6270849 | Popoola et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281431 | Cumley | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6327841 | Bertini et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347561 | Uneme et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6395989 | Lecoeuvre et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6416813 | Valls Prats et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418704 | Bertini et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6461730 | Bachmann et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6474057 | Bertini et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6534717 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6640533 | Bertini et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6646205 | Hase et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6810188 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6850681 | Lepont et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6903264 | Watanabe et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6906258 | Hirai et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6977280 | Lee et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7053308 | Prats et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7136556 | Brown et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7144952 | Court et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7411129 | Kummer et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7557301 | Kummer et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7749024 | Chambers et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8043119 | Kummer et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
20020002221 | Lee | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010252 | Lecoeuvre et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020043391 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030098176 | Mesaki et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040007308 | Houston et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040198909 | Breitscheidel et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050019353 | Prinz et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023029 | Mammeri et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036753 | Will et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050180725 | Carlson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070098340 | Lee et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20100236811 | Sasse et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4410456 | Sep 1995 | DE |
0 283 132 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0364717 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0544411 | Jun 1993 | EP |
1524294 | Apr 2005 | EP |
2674364 | Sep 1992 | FR |
59159708 | Sep 1984 | JP |
61076409 | Apr 1986 | JP |
63094503 | Jun 1988 | JP |
01110013 | Apr 1989 | JP |
01144504 | Jun 1989 | JP |
01166410 | Jun 1989 | JP |
01307110 | Dec 1989 | JP |
05266720 | Oct 1993 | JP |
06057145 | Mar 1994 | JP |
09045143 | Feb 1997 | JP |
09251811 | Sep 1997 | JP |
10012051 | Jan 1998 | JP |
2002231065 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2001264601 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003323820 | Nov 2003 | JP |
WO-8900763 | Jan 1989 | WO |
WO 0040653 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO-0181969 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-0190230 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-2005042226 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2006016896 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO-2007084745 | Jul 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/858,766, Jun. 9, 2008, 8 pp (US). |
Dow Corning presentation entitled “MBs to Improve CoF—Injection Moulding & Extrusion”; from filed entitled “DC (multibase) Masterbatch training 2004.ppt”; date uncertain; 8 pages (US). |
Howard & Howard letter to Mr. Thomas C. Wright dated Feb. 7, 2008 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/675,441 (2pp) (US). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-321 composition, Jan. 15, 2001 (2pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB25-504 composition, Jan. 2, 2002 (4pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB40-006 composition, Mar. 4, 2008 (1p) (http://www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-002 composition, Jan. 15, 2001 (4pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-320 composition, Mar. 4, 2008 (1p) (http://www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-004 composition, Jan. 15, 2001 (4pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-008 composition, Mar. 4, 2008 (1pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-010 composition, Jan. 16, 2001 (2pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-011 composition, Mar. 4, 2008 (1pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheets re Dow Corning MB50-313 and MB50-314 composition, Jan. 15, 2001 (4pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning article “Siloxane additive minimizes friction in fibre optic cable conduit”, 2001 (2pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com). |
Crompton Corporation brochure on Amides (approx. 2003) (27pp). |
Axel Plastics Research Laboratories, Inc., Product Data Sheet re “Mold Wiz, INT-33PA” (Approx. 2000) (1p). |
Axel Plastics Research Laboratories, Inc., Product Data Sheet re “Mold Wiz, INT-40DHT” (Approx. 2001) (1p). |
Axel Plastics Research Laboratories, Inc., Product Data Sheet re “Mold Wiz, INT-40GHT” (Approx. 2001) (1p). |
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Flyer entitled “Teflon”, (Aug. 14, 2003) (1p) http://www.dupont.com). |
General Electric Company, Brochure entitled “GE Silicones-Fluids, Emulsions & Specialties”, (2001) (19pp). |
WITCO Corporation, Brochure entitled “Fatty Acids, Glycerine, Triglycerides”, (1997) (22pp). |
Crompton Corporation, Brochure entitled “Vinyl Additives Product Guide”, (2002) (16pp). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/675,441, Dec. 28, 2007 (4pp). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/313,596, Mar. 20, 2007 (14pp). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,487, Nov. 2, 2005 (5pp). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,487, Jun. 8, 2006 (13pp). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/135,807, Dec. 15, 2005 (9pp). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/135,807, Jun. 8, 2006 (13pp). |
Cerro Wire, Inc.; Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. §§311-318 (USPTO); Sep. 26, 2008; pp. 1-90 (US). |
Southwire Company; Response to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination (USPTO); Oct. 21, 2008; pp. 1-27 (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/675,441; Oct. 6, 2008, 6 pages (US). |
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc.; Complaint for Patent Infringement and Demand for Jury Trial (with Exhibit A), Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-092-JTC, U.S.D.C.; Northern District of Georgia; Newnan Division; Aug. 12, 2008; 16 pp (US). |
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc.; Answer to Complaint for Patent Infringement and Demand for Jury Trial; Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-092-JTC; U.S.D.C.; Northern District of Georgia; Newnan Division; Oct. 16, 2008; 8 pp (US). |
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc.; Southwire Company's Motion, Memorandum and [Proposed] Order to Dismiss Cerro Wire Inc.'s Defenses of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103; Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-092-JTC; U.S.D.C.; Northern District of Georgia; Newnan Division; Jan. 2, 2009; 19 pp (US). |
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc.; Defendant Cerro Wire Inc.'s Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination of the Patent-In-Suit; Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-092-JTC; U.S.D.C.; Northern District of Georgia; Newnan Division; Dec. 12, 2008; 11 pp (US). |
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc.; Southwire's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Stay Pending Reexamination of the Patent-In-Suit (with Declarations of Winn Wise and Holly S. Hawkins); Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-092-JTC; U.S.D.C.; Northern District of Georgia; Newnan Division; Jan. 2, 2009; 75 pp (US). |
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc.; Defendant Cerro Wire's Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination of the Patent-In-Suit; Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-092-JTC; U.S.D.C.; Northern District of Georgia; Newnan Division; Jan. 16, 2009; 17 pp (US). |
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc.; Defendant Cerro Wire, Inc.'s Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Cerro's Invalidity Defenses Under 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103; Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-092-JTC; U.S.D.C.; Northern District of Georgia; Newnan Division; Jan. 16, 2009; 7 pp (US). |
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc.; Southwire Company's Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Cerro Wire Inc.'s Defenses of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 and Further Opposition to Cerro Wire, Inc.'s Motion for Stay Pending Reexamination of the Patent-In-Suit; Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-092-JTC; U.S.D.C.; Northern District of Georgia; Newnan Division; Jan. 26, 2009; 16 pp (US). |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/544,224, filed Feb. 12, 2004, Carlson et al., 3 pp. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Order Granting/Denying Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (with attached PTO/SB/08) (Application/Control No. 95/000,403); Dec. 5, 2008; 25 pages (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, Mar. 14, 2007, 10 pp (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, Mar. 4, 2008, 6 pp (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, Jul. 12, 2006, 13 pp (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, Aug. 7, 2007, 11 pp (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,222, Aug. 7, 2008, 8 pp (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/858,766, Feb. 9, 2009, 11 pp (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,222, Dec. 5, 2008 (12 pp). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,222, Jan. 8, 2009 (11 pp). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,222, Feb. 27, 2009 (8 pp). |
Southwire Company vs. Cerro Wire, Inc.; Court Order Granting Stay of Litigation pending USPTO's Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,411,129, Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-092-JTC; U.S.D.C.; Northern District of Georgia, Newnan Division, May 12, 2009, 13 pp. (US). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. EP 06739714.1, dated Nov. 12, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed Aug. 21, 2006 from WO 2007/81372 (International App. No. PCT/US06/11069). |
International Search Report Mailed Oct. 20, 2006 from WO 2006/127711 (International App. No. PCT/US06/19923). |
International Search Report Mailed Dec. 20, 2005 from WO 2006/16895 (International App. No. PCT/US05/05165). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. 7,411,129 (Application/Control No. 95/000,403), Dec. 5, 2008, 26 pages (US). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-001 composition, Jan. 15, 2001 (6pp) (http://www.dowcorning.com). |
Examination Report for New Zealand Application No. 564551, dated Aug. 14, 2009. |
Southwire Company v. Encore Wire Corporation and Cerro Wire, Inc.; Southwire Company's Answer to Encore Wire Corporation's First Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims, Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-289-LED; U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, Feb. 12, 2010, 17 pp. (US). |
Dow Corning, Dow Corning MB50-011 Masterbatch Product Information, Ultra-high molecular weight siloxane polymer dispered in nylon 6, 1999, pp. 1-5. |
International Search Report Mailed May 17, 2010 from WO 2010/107932 (International App. No. PCT/US2010/027684). |
Encore Wire, Inc.; Introductory Portion of Corrected Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. §§1.193 (Application/Control No. 95/000,573); Oct. 8, 2010; pp. 1-74 (US). |
Encore Wire, Inc.; Exhibits 1-9 (Claim Charts) of Corrected Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. §§1.193 (Application/Control No. 95/000,573); Oct. 8, 2010; pp. 1-137 (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. 7,749,024 (Application/Control No. 95/000,573), Dec. 3, 2010, 12 pages (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Response to Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. 7,749,024 (Application/Control No. 95/000,573), Feb. 3, 2011, 1-17 pages (US). |
Cerro Wire, Inc.; Introductory Portion of Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. §§311-318 (Control No. 95/000,594); Nov. 17, 2010; pp. 1-37 (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. 7,749,024 (Application/Control No. 95/000,594), Feb. 11, 2011, 25 pages (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Response to Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. 7,749,024 (Application/Control No. 95/000,594), Apr. 11, 2011, 1-35 pages (US). |
Cerro Wire, Inc.; Exhibit W-1-W-10 (Claim Charts), Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. §§311-318 (Control No. 95/000,594); Nov. 17, 2010; pp. 1-1023 (US). |
Cerro Wire, Inc.; Exhibit W-11-W-20 (Claim Charts), Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. §§311-318 (Control No. 95/000,594); Nov. 17, 2010; pp. 1-1023 (US). |
Cerro Wire, Inc.; Exhibit W-21-W-30 (Claim Charts), Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. §§311-318 (Control No. 95/000,594); Nov. 17, 2010; pp. 1-1023 (US). |
Cerro Wire, Inc.; Exhibit W-31-W-38 (Claim Charts), Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. §§311-318 (Control No. 95/000,594); Nov. 17, 2010; pp. 1-1023 (US). |
Dow Corning, Dow Corning MB50-011 Masterbatch. |
Wild, “The Effects of Silicone Polymer Additions on the Processing and Properties of an Isotactic Propylene Homopolymer”. |
Cerro Wire, Inc.; Request for Ex Parte Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. §§311-318 (USPTO); Oct. 1, 2009; 359 pages. |
Encore Wire Corporation; Request for Ex Parte Reexamination Statements Under 35 U.S.C. §§1.150(b)(1) and 1.150(b)(2) (USPTO); Nov. 17, 2009; 44 pages. |
Decoste, J. B.: “Friction of Vinyl Chloride Plastics,” Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., Murray Hill, N.J., SPE Journal, Oct. 1969, vol. 25 (6 pages). |
Kaufman, et al., “A PVC jacket compound with improved flame retardancy and superior physical properties”, Wire Technology, pp. 44-50, 7/8:75, (paper presented at the 23rd international Wire & Cable Symposium in Atlantic City, Dec. 1974), 7 pgs. |
Richard E. Marquis, Adam J. Maltby; An Introduction to Fatty Acid Amid Slip and Anti-Blocking Agents; Polymer, Laminations & Coatings Conf., Aug. 30, 1998; pp. 942-952 (US). |
Ryan, et al., “Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Functional Siloxane Additives in Polymers. Effects on Processing and Properties,” Vinyl & Additive Technology, Mar. 2000, vol. 6, No. 1 (Mar. 2000), 13 pgs. |
ultra-X TM, Une nouvelle dimension dans les cables NMD-7, ultra-X product brochure, Northern Telecom—Power Cable Division, Apr. 11, 1977, 28 pgs. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Response to Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Filed Aug. 15, 2012, 27 pages (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Response to Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Filed Sep. 10, 2012, 67 pages (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Right of Appeal Notice in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,573), Sep. 28, 2012, 53 pages (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Right of Appeal Notice in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. 7,749,024 (U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,594), Oct. 25, 2012, 162 pages (US). |
Wiles, John, “Clarifying Confusing Cables,” Home Power #66, Aug./Sep. 1998. |
Abstract of Abstract of FR 2674364, Sep. 25, 1992, 3 pgs. |
Abstract of JP 01-144504, Patent Abstracts of Japan, Jun. 6, 1989, 1 pg. |
Abstract of JP 2002231065, Patent Abstracts of Japan, and machine translation, Aug. 16, 2002, 12 pgs. |
J.B. Decoste; Friction of Vinyl Chloride Plastics; SPE Journal, Oct. 1969. |
Dow Corning, Dow Corning MB50-011 Masterbatch Product Information, Ultra-high molecular weight siloxane polymer dispered in polyamide 6, Jan. 15, 2001 (4pp). |
Wild, “The Effects of Silicone Polymer Additions on the Processing and Properties of an Isotactic Propylene Homopolymer,” Sep. 1995, 102 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120031642 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12787877 | May 2010 | US |
Child | 13274052 | US | |
Parent | 11675441 | Feb 2007 | US |
Child | 12787877 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11120487 | May 2005 | US |
Child | 11675441 | US | |
Parent | 10952294 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 11120487 | US |