Perishable products have a limited shelf life. Ascertaining the shelf life of perishable products is necessary to allow growers, suppliers and manufacturers to limit waste and ensure that product reaching consumers is fresh.
The shelf life of certain packaged products correlates well with loss of a given permeant through the package. One such packaged product is carbonated beverages, wherein the shelf life determining factor for the product is typically loss of carbonation.
While instruments and techniques are known and in use for measuring the transmission rate of a permeant through a container, a continuing need exists for a quick, accurate and cost effective method.
A first aspect of the invention is a method of measuring the transmission rate of a permeant through a container. The method includes the steps of (i) placing a sealed container containing permeant within a sealed retention chamber, and (ii) periodically measuring permeant concentration within the headspace of the retention chamber until a substantially steady state increase in permeant concentration within the headspace is sensed.
A second aspect of the invention is a method of determining shelf life of a packaged product within a sealed container based upon loss of a permeant through the container. The method includes the steps of (i) placing a sealed container containing a perishable product and a permeant within a sealed retention chamber, (ii) periodically measuring concentration of the permeant within the headspace of the retention chamber until a substantially steady state increase in permeant concentration within the headspace is sensed, and (iii) calculating a shelf life for the sealed container by dividing an amount of permeant loss, previously established as correlating to product expiration, by the sensed steady state increase in permeant concentration.
As utilized herein, including the claims, the term “transmission rate” means the rate at which a permeant diffuses through a given container at standard pressure and temperature. The result is expressed as the volume or weight of permeant per day through the container.
As utilized herein, including the claims, the term “permeant” means any chemical substance which can diffuse through packaging material.
As utilized herein, including the claims, the term “headspace” means the volume remaining in the retention chamber after placement of a container within the chamber and the chamber is sealed.
As utilized herein, including the claims, the phrase “substantially steady state increase in permeant concentration” means rate of change in permeant concentration within a standard deviation of ±5%.
Structure
As shown in
The instrument 10 can be effectively employed to measure the transmission rate of a wide variety of permeants through a wide variety of containers 100. Typical permeants of interest include O2, water vapor and CO2. Containers 100 may range from fairly rigid packaging such as thin-walled polyvinyl chloride tubes, through semi-flexible packaging such as wax-coated cartons and thin-walled polyethylene bottles, to flexible packaging such as bags made from polyethylene terephthalate (i.e., MYLAR®) or polyethylene films. A typical application of the instrument 10 is measurement of the transmission rate of CO2 from a carbonated beverage through a plastic bottle. Without intending to be limited to this particular application, the balance of the disclosure shall reference this typical application.
Referring to
Referring to
The housing 20 should be constructed from a material which is essentially impervious to and does not appreciably adsorb or transpire the permeant of interest. Most metals possess these desired properties. The housing 20 defines a retention chamber 29 and has an opening (unnumbered) for permitting the introduction and removal of containers 100 from the retention chamber 29. The cover plate 30 is configured and arranged to sealingly engage the opening through the housing 20 after a container 100 has been placed in the retention chamber 29. As with the housing 20, the cover plate 30 should be constructed from a material which is meaningfully impervious to and does not adsorb or transpire the permeant of interest.
The gas sensor 50 is effective for sensing and measuring the concentration of the permeant of interest—such as CO2— within the headspace 120 of the retention chamber 29. Suitable sensors 50 for use in the instrument 10 include specifically, but not exclusively, commercially available infrared gas sensors.
Referring to
As with the housing 20 and cover plate 30, the tubing 70 should be constructed from a material which is essentially impervious to and does not appreciably adsorb or transpire the permeant of interest.
Referring to
Referring generally to
As shown in
The microcontroller or processor 60 is programmed to (1) initiate testing upon receipt of a START command from a user, (2) periodically receive and record timed data values from the gas sensor 50 representing the concentration of a permeant of interest (e.g., CO2), and (3) calculate the rate of change in sensed permeant concentration. Alternatively, the recorded data may be downloaded to a separate processing unit (not shown) (e.g., a desktop computer) for performance of step (3) upon completion of testing. The microcontroller or processor 60 can be programmed to continue this process until (i) an END command is received from a user, (ii) a predefined testing period is reached (e.g., 3 hours), (iii) a programmed definition of steady state increase in permeant concentration is achieved (e.g., upon receipt of data values over a thirty minute span producing the same calculated change in permeant concentration within a standard deviation of ±5%), or (iv) capacity of memory 85 has been reached. Regardless of the termination criteria employed, the criteria should be established to ensure that a substantially steady state increase in permeant concentration is achieved when the test is terminated.
The measured transmission rate of the permeant through the container 100 can be used to calculate a shelf life value for the container 100 by dividing an amount of permeant loss, previously established as correlating to expiration of product 110, by the measured transmission rate of the permeant through the container 100. This calculation can be conducted on board by the microcontroller or processor 60 or by a separate processing unit (not shown) after downloading of the recorded data.
The instrument 10 may be constructed as a portable or desktop unit.
The shelf life of a bottle of a carbonated beverage described in Table One, conditioned at room temperature and pressure for exactly five days prior to testing to permit the diffusion of CO2 through the bottle to reach equilibrium, is determined using an instrument of the present invention having a capture volume of 3,535 cm3
The Bottle CO2 Gas Volume (initial) may be ascertained (i) immediately after the carbonated beverage is sealed within the bottle, (ii) at a time when the diffusion of CO2 through the bottle is likely to have reached equilibrium, or (iii) upon commencement of testing. The bottle is sealed within the retention chamber of the instrument and the concentration of CO2 within the headspace of the retention chamber is measured every two seconds for 3 hours (0.125 days). The difference between the concentration of CO2 within the headspace of the retention chamber at the beginning of the testing period and at the end of the three hour testing period (ΔCO2 HEADSPACE) is measured at 0.15%.
The transmission rate of CO2 through the container is calculated as set forth below.
TR=(HV)(ΔCO2 HEADSPACE)/(100)(t)
wherein:
HV=Capture Volume−Bottle Volume (external)=3,535 cm3−2,100 cm3=1,435 cm3
ΔCO2 HEADSPACE=0.15%
T=0.125 days
∴TR=(1,435 cm3)(0.15)/(100)(0.125 days)=17.22 cm3/day
The simple shelf life of the carbonated beverage in the container, calculated without consideration of any decrease in TR over the shelf life resulting from a loss of pressure in the container, is calculated as set forth below.
Shelf Life (simple)=(ΔCO2 BOTTLE)/TR
wherein:
ΔCO2 BOTTLE=CO2 Volume in Bottle at Commencement of Testing−CO2 Volume in Bottle at Product Expiration
wherein:
CO2 Volume in Bottle at Commencement of Testing=(Bottle Volume (internal))(Bottle Gas Gas Volume (initial))=(2,000 cm3)(4)=8,000 cm3
-and-
CO2 Volume in Bottle at Expiration of Product=(Bottle Volume (internal))(Bottle Gas Gas Volume (expiration))=(2,000 cm3)(3.6)=7,200 cm3
∴ΔCO2 BOTTLE=8,000 cm3−7,200 cm3=800 cm3
Shelf Life (simple)=800 cm3/17.22 cm3/day=46.45 days
True shelf life of the product, based upon the calculated simple shelf life, is 51.45 days, ascertained by simply adding the five days during which the bottle was conditioned to the calculated simple shelf life.
A more accurate shelf life for the carbonated beverage in the container, one which factors in the decreasing TR over the shelf life of the product resulting from a loss of pressure in the bottle, can be calculated as set forth below.
Shelf Life=Log(% Total CO2 Loss)/Log(% Daily CO2 Loss)
wherein:
% Total CO2 Loss=CO2 Volume at Expiration of Product/CO2 Volume at Commencement of Testing
wherein:
CO2 Volume at Expiration of Product=(Bottle Volume (internal))(Bottle Gas Volume (expiration))=(2,000 cm3)(3.6)=7,200 cm3
-and-
CO2 Volume at Commencement of Testing=(Bottle Volume (internal))(Bottle Gas Volume (initial))=(2,000 cm3)(4)=8,000 cm3
∴% Total CO2 Loss=7,200 cm3/8,000 cm3=0.900%
-and-
% Daily CO2 Loss=((CO2 Volume at Commencement of Testing)−(TR)(1 day))/(CO2 Volume at Commencement of Testing)=8,000 cm3−(17.22 cm3/day)(1 day)/8,000 cm3=0.99784
∴Shelf Life=Log(0.90000)/Log(0.99784)=−0.04576/−0.0009390=48.73 days
True shelf life of the product, based upon this calculated shelf life, is 53.73 days, again ascertained by simply adding the five days during which the bottle was conditioned to the calculated shelf life.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/808,706, filed May 26, 2006.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3081250 | Hall et al. | Mar 1963 | A |
3337441 | Goldsmith | Aug 1967 | A |
4047422 | Lyssy | Sep 1977 | A |
4800000 | Zatko et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5513515 | Mayer | May 1996 | A |
5591898 | Mayer | Jan 1997 | A |
6018987 | Mayer et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6354138 | Ascheman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6640615 | Morrow | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6857307 | Gebele et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6892567 | Morrow | May 2005 | B1 |
6964191 | Tata | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7278292 | Wild et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20020194899 | Gebele et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040040372 | Plester et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20060032293 | Wild et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19642009 | Apr 1997 | DE |
326421 | Aug 1989 | EP |
2008772 | Jun 1979 | GB |
2306223 | Apr 1997 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60808706 | May 2006 | US |