Patent Application
20200148571
The present invention relates to a combustion method applied to a method of melting raw materials, for example glass, in a cross-fired furnace and more specifically relates to a method aiming at reducing the formation of nitrogen oxides (NOx) in the flames used during the melting of the raw materials.
The invention further relates to a cross-fired melting furnace implementing such a method aiming at reducing the emission of NOx.
Several types of melting furnaces for producing different types of glass or other materials are known, including cross-fired furnaces.
The following terms may be used in the present description. The following definitions are only given by way of example:
In a cross-fired regenerative furnace, two sets of ports are arranged in opposite side walls and burners are operated alternately on one side and then the other for approximately 10-30 minutes per side. Oxidiser such as air is generally pre-heated by the combustion products produced in the preceding cycle (regenerative principle). During first periods of time, fuel and an oxidiser are supplied to only a first set of the two sets of ports with the oxidiser supplied via a regenerator, while the hot waste gases (or combustion products) are exhausted via the other set of ports and their associated regenerator. During alternate second periods of time, fuel and an oxidiser such as air are supplied to the other set of the two sets of ports, while the combustion products are exhausted via the first set of ports.
The ports are thus alternately operated in the function of an inlet port and an exhaust port. A heat exchanger, or regenerator is connected upstream from the supply opening of a port in the supply path of the oxidiser. A similar regenerator is found downstream of the exhaust port. On reversal of the firing direction, exhaust gas heat stored in the exhaust regenerator during the previous cycle is used to heat the incoming fresh oxidiser.
This process of heat recovery into the incoming oxidiser increases the thermal efficiency of the melting furnace and ensures the achievement of the high temperatures needed to melt the raw materials (circa 1500° C., 2700° F.).
When the oxidiser is air, as is usually the case on industrial glass melting furnaces, Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), a regulated air pollutant, usually arise during the combustion of the fuel and oxidiser mixture. The nitrogen in the air combines with the oxygen in the air at the high temperatures found in glass melting furnace flames to form ‘thermal NOx’. In the case of regenerative glass melting furnaces, concentrations of NOx in the exhaust gases are typically in the range of 750 to 2500 mg/Nm3 at 8% O2, the standard condition for comparing NOx emissions.
It is important to try to reduce the nitrogen oxide fraction in the exhaust gas to meet the limit of 500 mg/Nm3 at 8% O2 set by current or imminent emissions regulations in many parts of the world. This requires ‘as found’ NOx emissions to be reduced by between 30% and 80%.
The option commonly deployed to reduce the NOx emissions from glass melting furnaces (or other types of furnaces) is post-treatment of the exhaust gas. However, such exhaust gas purification devices are costly and constitute additional equipment which requires additional space and high operating and maintenance cost. Typically, a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) plant to achieve up to 90% NOx reduction on a large cross-fired glass melting furnace has a capital cost of several million Euros and annual operating costs of hundreds of thousands of Euros. It requires the replacement of about ⅓ of the catalyst each year. It also requires the use of urea or ammonia (NH3) as a reducing agent, the latter a gas that is itself a regulated pollutant. A lower capital alternative is selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) carried out inside the exhaust regenerator. SNCR uses ammonia or urea to react with the NOx and decompose the NOx. It must be carried out at a very particular temperature between 870° C. and 1090° C. Above this temperature the ammonia reacts to produce more NOx, while below it the ammonia leaves the regenerator unreacted to add to the emissions from the plant. On a reversing regenerative glass melting furnace, the right conditions for effective SNCR exist only for a small portion of the regenerative cycle at any given location in the regenerator. This renders SNCR quite ineffective.
Tsai (EP 0882488 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,893,940) introduces additional fuel and oxidiser into the exhaust gases in an attempt to stabilise their temperature entering the regenerative heat exchanger and thus to extend the portion of the furnace cycle for which SNCR is effective. The method works although is very difficult to control the temperature within the required range. Thus the effectiveness of Tsai's approach is limited and in addition it adds to the cost of the ammonia by increasing the fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of the furnace by several percentage points.
A more successful approach to cleaning up the exhaust gas after it leaves the melting chamber has been the addition of excess fuel either to the exhaust or within the melting chamber so that there is insufficient oxidiser available for complete combustion. In this circumstance, carbon monoxide (CO) and Hydrogen (H) is formed in the exhaust (reducing atmosphere), and these reduce NOx to nitrogen (N2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O) in the exhaust port and within the regenerators. Air must be introduced at the downstream end of the regenerator (sometimes called “over fired air”) to burn the excess CO (another regulated pollutant) and to try to recover part of the heat lost in the additional fuel.
This method, called “reburning” technology, was originally proposed by Quirk (EP0599548—the so-called 3R process) who used the non-firing burners in or near the exhaust ports to introduce the excess fuel. However, although it has the potential to achieve the required 80% reduction in NOx at a very low capital cost, this is at the price of an increase of between 5% and 15% in fuel consumption and CO2 emissions. The 3R approach also imposes chemical and thermal stress on the regenerators leading to a reduction in regenerator life. For these reasons, this approach has almost been abandoned by the glass industry.
In an attempt to improve this reburning fuel technology, Ichiraku (JP08208240) proposed a method of reducing NOx using after-burning in the regenerator. In this method excess fuel is injected into the furnace through injectors in the crown or in the exhaust port. NOx formed by the conventional burners enters the regenerators in a highly reducing atmosphere which results in decomposition of the NOx into nitrogen and carbon dioxide. A certain time is required for this “after burning” reaction which is usually complete part way through the regenerator. At this point air may be injected to burn the excess fuel at a relatively low temperature. Some of the heat generated is recovered by the regenerator and some leaves in the higher temperature gases from the regenerator. The technique is similar to the Quirk 3R process except that in 3R the excess gas is injected in the exhaust port neck. It suffers from similar drawbacks and it has not seen widespread application.
In summary, while all the exhaust gas clean up approaches discussed above are capable of achieving the required NOx reductions of up to 80%, they only achieve this at the price of high capital cost, or high running costs, or in some cases both. In addition, the Quirk and Ichiraku approaches lead to a large (circa 10%) increase in CO2 emissions.
An alternative approach is to reduce or avoid the formation of NOx in the melting chamber. Burner tuning, including the reduction of excess oxidiser (removing the available oxygen for the NOx forming reaction) and lengthening the flame (reducing peak flame temperature and hence the rate of NOx formation) is possible, but will typically yield not more than 10% to 20% reduction before high levels of CO appear in the exhaust. This or an associated loss of furnace output prevents their further use.
Moreau (U.S. Pat. No. 6,047,565) proposes to create a “blanket” of inert gas between the oxidiser entering through the inlet port and the fuel entering through the burner, thus delaying combustion of the main fuel producing lower temperatures in the main flame and thus reducing NOx formation. The method applies only to underport firing arrangements where the fuel is introduced through one or more burners situated below the oxidiser ports and the stream of oxidiser flowing through them. Moreau proposes various methods of producing this “blanket”. Usually the “Blanket” is formed in or below the combustion inlet port by introducing at low velocity a small (typically 5% and always less than 30%) quantity of the fuel between the main fuel jet and the oxidiser. The method can produce excessively long flames which do not complete combustion in the furnace and may result in undesirable reducing conditions at the glass surface. U.S. Pat. No. 6,047,565 proposes methods to overcome these undesired effects by injection of high pressure jets of oxygen or air between the main fuel jets and the surface of the molten glass. This is quite a complex arrangement to manage. The total oxidiser supplied through the oxidiser port and the supplementary oxygen lances is held close to or below the amount needed for complete combustion. This fuel rich operation also contributes to reducing the NOx but the inventor gives no indication of the method's effectiveness in reducing NOx.
Nakamura (JP 05180409) reduces the formation of NOx by injecting part of the fuel through two injectors located on the same wall as the combustion air inlet port at a location adjacent to the port and directed in the same direction as the air and flame. Fuel from the two injectors is mixed with re-circulated waste gases which are low in oxygen and therefore burns slowly at a lower temperature resulting in lower NOx formation. In practical terms it is difficult to fit injectors at this location. Due to the proximity of the incoming oxidiser stream, there is insufficient distance available for the injector fuel to mix with the combustion products before encountering and mixing with the combustion air thus reducing the effectiveness of the Nakamura injection method.
Demarest (U.S. Pat. No. 4,599,100) discloses a method for operating a cross-fired melting furnace using excess air firing. In this document, additional fuel is introduced through an additional burner to consume the excess air. The injection of additional fuel in this document is such that the reduction of excess air is on top of the flame so that the area between the flame and the glass remains oxidising and the exhaust from the furnace still contains some excess air. As the total amount of excess air is typically 20% the amount of additional fuel must be small. In order to achieve significant NOx reduction the total excess air must be reduced to very close to stoichiometric which is unlikely using the described technique. Demarest does not specify the amount of NOx reduction obtainable using this method.
Ward (WO 2008/074961 A2) discloses a combustion method for melting glass in which two fuels of the same nature or of different natures are fed into a melting chamber through burners and auxiliary injectors at two locations remote from each other for distributing the burner fuel and the auxiliary fuel in the melting chamber in order to reduce the NOx emissions, the oxidiser being supplied only at the location of the burner. The method takes advantage of the stream of recirculating combustion products that occupy a substantial fraction of the space above the incoming oxidiser and its burner flames. The design of the ports and the burners is such that these flames lie close to the surface of the molten glass, with the rest of the furnace filled with recirculating exhaust gases into which Ward injects part of the fuel. According to Ward, a portion (from 10% to 100%) of the fuel supplied through the burners is removed and introduced into the recirculating combustion products in such a way and at such a location so as to completely mix with and partially burn in the oxygen poor combustion products before they encounter and completely burn in the incoming oxidiser above the inlet port, a process labelled Auxiliary Injection.
The use of the recirculating combustion products of Ward can be improved.
The present invention proposes and claims new auxiliary injection configurations to prevent the creation of NOx and furthermore to improve on Ward's (WO 2008/074961 A2) combustion process.
The technical problem to be solved is to provide a combustion method for a cross-fired melting furnace which remedies the above-mentioned problems or drawbacks and in particular diminishes the creation of NOx while maintaining the output and quality of molten material from the cross-fired melting furnace.
In particular, the invention aims at reducing the nitrogen oxide fraction of the exhaust gas at low cost and without introducing cumbersome additional equipment while maintaining or improving the melting process.
The invention is defined in the appended claims.
The invention provides a method of melting raw materials by a cross-fired melting furnace which has:
a melting tank for receiving raw materials to be melted and for accommodating a melted materials bath;
a melting chamber located above said melting tank and comprising a first side wall, a second side wall opposite said first side wall, a back wall located at an upstream area of said melting tank, a front wall located at a downstream area of said melting tank, and a roof;
N first ports being provided in the first side wall in horizontally spaced locations between said back wall and front wall, each of said at least one series of N first ports being associated with a corresponding first burner of a series of N first burners;
N second ports being located in the second side wall in horizontally spaced locations between said back wall and front wall, each of said N second ports being located opposite a first port to define N couples of first and second ports;
wherein re-circulating combustion products flow in a substantially vertical loop above a flame; the method comprising:
introducing a first fraction X1 of fuel into said melting chamber via said first burners,
introducing a second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel, with X2+X1 being equal to 1, using at least one auxiliary fuel injector, the at least one auxiliary fuel injector being arranged in the cross-fired melting furnace in said roof or in the side wall not comprising burners introducing fuel so that the at least one auxiliary fuel injector introduces the second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel,
in the direction of the flow of said re-circulating combustion products,
without additional oxidiser,
into said re-circulating combustion products, the auxiliary fuel injector being located at a point where said second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel will mix with the recirculating combustion products, before reaching incoming oxidiser introduced by a port,
the velocities of the jets introducing the fraction X1 of fuel and the fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel being adapted so that the sum of their corresponding jet momenta is comprised between −30% or +30% of a value corresponding to the jet momentum of the fuel when X2 equals zero (and X1 equals 1), and
the energy provided by the quantity of the sum of the first fraction of fuel X1 and the second fraction of fuel X2 being adapted to produce a given required energy for melting said materials without over-fuelling the furnace.
Over fuelling refers to an introduction of fuel which is in excess of the amount of fuel which can be burned by the available oxidiser. Over fuelling may occur in solutions of the prior art in which fuel is added into the melting chamber such as in Ichiraku.
Thus, the second fraction of auxiliary fuel X2 is introduced in the recirculating combustion products in a manner which enhances the flow of recirculating combustion products, ensuring an effective dilution of the auxiliary fuel to reduce NOx formation.
This results from the position and the direction of the jet of auxiliary fuel which introduces the fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel, and from the velocity of the auxiliary injection. It should be noted that this feature is not disclosed in document Ward which is silent on how the auxiliary fuel is introduced. As a matter of fact, in document Ward, the quantity of fuel introduced by a burner may be reduced so as to introduce another quantity of fuel through an auxiliary fuel injector. However, reducing the quantity of fuel introduced by a burner reduces the mass flow of the recirculating combustion products. The inventors of the present invention have discovered that by changing the direction and the velocity of the injection of the auxiliary fuel, and the velocity of the fuel leaving of the burners, it is possible to maintain the mass flow of the recirculating combustion products and thus to obtain a better NOx reduction effect without over fuelling the furnace.
The skilled person knows how to determine the required energy for melting materials efficiently for a given furnace and application. The sum of the momenta of the two fluids can be deduced from this energy (at plus or minus 30%). Furthermore, the fractions X1 and X2 may be chosen so as to obtain a desired level of NOx reduction.
Contrary to known solutions of the prior art which require modifications of the excess oxygen levels compared to a stoichiometric condition, the invention may operate within the existing excess oxygen levels for a furnace and for a specific melting application (with X2 being equal to zero).
It should be noted that the expression “X2+X1 being equal to 1” is equivalent to the expression: the quantity (for example the mass) of fuel per unit time (or the corresponding energy per unit time) introduced in the melting chamber will be divided, or substantially divided, between the fuel introduced through the burner(s) and the auxiliary fuel.
Also, the value corresponding to the jet momentum of the fuel when X2 equals zero corresponds to the value when the fuel is only injected using the burner(s) to operate the furnace and to melt the same materials. Thus, this value corresponds to the normal functioning of the furnace for this application.
According to a particular embodiment, said at least one auxiliary fuel injector is located in said roof at the same distance from a first port and a second port opposite to the first port.
According to a particular embodiment, each of said second series of N second ports is associated with a corresponding second burner of a series of N second burners, and said first ports and said second ports are alternately operable as an inlet port and as exhaust port, said first ports being inlet port when said second ports are exhaust ports and said first ports being exhaust ports when said second ports are inlet ports.
According to a particular embodiment, couples of first and second auxiliary fuel injectors are associated with each couple of oppositely arranged first and second ports, said first and second auxiliary fuel injectors being located in said roof or in said first and second side walls respectively in the vicinity of the first and second ports of the associated couple of oppositely arranged first and second ports, so that said first and second auxiliary fuel injectors are alternately operable to inject said second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel, said first or second auxiliary fuel injectors being operable when the corresponding first or second ports located in the vicinity of said first or second auxiliary fuel injectors are exhaust ports.
According to a particular embodiment, said first and second burners and said at least one auxiliary fuel injector operate with the same fuel.
In this particular embodiment, a fraction of a fuel is routed to the burners and the remainder is routed to the at least one auxiliary fuel injector.
According to a particular embodiment, said first and second burners on the one hand and said at least one auxiliary fuel injectors on the other hand respectively operate with different fuels.
In this particular embodiment, two fuels are used corresponding to a quantity of energy which will be divided between the burners and the at least one auxiliary fuel injector.
According to a particular embodiment, said first and second burners on the one hand and said at least one auxiliary fuel injector on the other hand respectively operate with a fuel selected from the group consisting of natural gas, LPG, fuel oil, coke-oven gas, blast furnace gas, reforming gas, biofuel, methane, and hydrogen.
According to a particular embodiment, said at least one auxiliary fuel injector includes a device putting into rotation the injected auxiliary fuel to create a swirl effect.
According to a particular embodiment, said at least one auxiliary fuel injector includes a device to adjust or alter the jet momentum of the injected auxiliary fuel. For example, this may be done by the use of a pressurised jet of fuel, air or inert gas, or steam concentric with the Auxiliary fuel jet.
According to a particular embodiment, said second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel represents between 10 and 100% of the sum of the first and second fractions X1 and X2 of fuel.
According to a particular embodiment, the method comprises introducing the second fraction of auxiliary fuel X2 so as to reinforce the mass flow of re-circulating combustion products.
According to a particular embodiment, the method comprises adjusting or turning off some of the burners so as to reinforce the mass flow of re-circulating combustion products.
According to a particular embodiment, the velocity of the jet for introducing the second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel is comprised between 10 and 70 m/s.
According to a particular embodiment, the first auxiliary injectors are located at a distance less than one half and greater than one quarter of the width of the melting chamber from the side wall which is the closest to the first auxiliary injector, and the second auxiliary injectors are located a quarter of the width of the melting chamber from the side wall which is the closest to the second auxiliary injector (i.e. the side wall opposite the side wall which is the closest to the first auxiliary injector).
The invention also provides a cross-fired melting furnace comprising:
a melting tank for receiving raw materials to be melted and for accommodating a melted materials bath;
a melting chamber located above said melting tank and comprising a first side wall, a second side wall opposite said first side wall, a back wall located at an upstream area of said melting tank, a front wall located at a downstream area of said melting tank, and a roof;
N first ports being provided in the first side wall in horizontally spaced locations between said back wall and front wall, each of said at least one series of N first ports being associated with a corresponding first burner of a series of N first burners introducing a first fraction X1 of fuel into said melting chamber via said first burners, whereas re-circulating combustion products flow in a substantially vertical loop above a flame;
N second ports being located in the second side wall in horizontally spaced locations between said back wall and front wall, each of said N second ports being located opposite a first port to define N couples of first and second ports;
at least one auxiliary fuel injector arranged in the cross-fired melting furnace in said roof or in the side wall not comprising burners introducing fuel,
a module for controlling the at least one auxiliary fuel injector to introduce a second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel, with X2+X1 being equal to 1,
in the direction of the flow of said re-circulating combustion products,
without additional oxidiser,
into said re-circulating combustion products, the auxiliary fuel injector being located at a point where said second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel will mix with the recirculating combustion products, before reaching incoming oxidiser introduced by a port,
the velocities of the jets introducing the fraction X1 of fuel and the fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel being adapted so that the sum of their corresponding jet momenta is comprised between −30% or +30% of a value corresponding to the jet momentum of the fuel when X2 equals zero (and X1 equals 1), and
the energy provided by the quantity of the sum of the first fraction of fuel X1 and the second fraction of fuel X2 being adapted to produce a given required energy for melting said materials without over-fuelling the furnace.
The above defined cross-fired melting furnace may be able to perform all the embodiments of the method as defined above.
According to a particular embodiment, said at least one auxiliary fuel injector is located in said roof at the same distance from a first port and a second port opposite to the first port.
According to a particular embodiment, each of said second series of N second ports is associated with a corresponding second burner of a series of N second burners, and said first ports and said second ports are alternately operable as an inlet port and as exhaust port, said first ports being inlet port when said second ports are exhaust ports and said first ports being exhaust ports when said second ports are inlet ports.
According to a particular embodiment, couples of first and second auxiliary fuel injectors are associated with each couple of oppositely arranged first and second ports, said first and second auxiliary fuel injectors being located in said roof or in said first and second side walls respectively in the vicinity of the first and second ports of the associated couple of oppositely arranged first and second ports, so that said first and second auxiliary fuel injectors are alternately operable to inject said second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel, said first or second auxiliary fuel injectors being operable when the corresponding first or second ports located in the vicinity of said first or second auxiliary fuel injectors are exhaust ports.
According to a particular embodiment, said first and second burners and said at least one auxiliary fuel injector operate with the same fuel.
According to a particular embodiment, said first and second burners on the one hand and said at least one auxiliary fuel injectors on the other hand respectively operate with different fuels.
According to a particular embodiment, said first and second burners on the one hand and said at least one auxiliary fuel injector on the other hand respectively operate with a fuel selected from the group consisting of natural gas, LPG, fuel oil, coke-oven gas, blast furnace gas, reforming gas, biofuel, methane, and hydrogen.
According to a particular embodiment, said at least one auxiliary fuel injector includes a device putting into rotation the injected auxiliary fuel to create a swirl effect.
According to a particular embodiment, said at least one auxiliary fuel injector includes a device to adjust or alter the jet momentum of the injected auxiliary fuel.
According to a particular embodiment, said second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel represents between 10 and 100% of the sum of the first and second fractions X1 and X2 of fuel.
According to a particular embodiment, said module is configured for introducing the second fraction of auxiliary fuel X2 so as to reinforce the mass flow of re-circulating combustion products.
According to a particular embodiment, said module is configured for adjusting or turning off some of the burners so as to reinforce the mass flow of re-circulating combustion products.
According to a particular embodiment, the velocity of the jet for introducing the second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel is comprised between 10 and 70 m/s.
According to a particular embodiment, the first auxiliary injectors are located at a distance less than one half and greater than one quarter of the width of the melting chamber from the side wall which is the closest to the first auxiliary injector, and the second auxiliary injectors are located a quarter of the width of the melting chamber from the side wall which is the closest to the second auxiliary injector.
Other characteristics and advantages of the invention appear from the following description of particular embodiments, given as examples and with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The present invention will be described in connection with preferred embodiments which are given by way of examples. In the following examples, glass is the material to be melted by the furnace. However, the invention is also directed to the melting of other types of materials. The features of the different embodiments may be combined unless otherwise stated.
A typical arrangement of an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
As shown in
A melting chamber 8 is located above the melting tank 7 and comprises a first side wall 2, a second side wall 1, a back wall 3 located at the upstream area of the melting tank 7, a front wall 4 located at the downstream area of the melting tank 7, and a roof 6.
A first set of horizontally aligned N first ports 31 to 36 are provided in the side wall 2 of the melting chamber 8 whereas a second set of horizontally aligned N second ports 41 to 46 are provided in the side wall 1 of the melting chamber 8. The second ports 41 to 46 are transversely aligned with the first ports 31 to 36, thus defining a set of N couples of first and second ports 31, 41, . . . , 36, 46.
N is an integer which may be preferably comprised between 1 and 8. In the examples shown in the drawings, N=6.
The first and second ports 31 to 36 and 41 to 46 are associated with first and second burners 11 to 16 and 21 to 26 respectively for injecting a first fuel into the melting chamber 8. The first and second ports 31 to 36 and 41 to 46 are alternately operable as inlet ports for introducing oxidiser (for example air) in the chamber and as exhaust ports for combustion products. The first ports 31 to 36 are inlet ports when the second ports 41 to 46 are exhaust ports and the first ports 31 to 36 are exhaust ports when the second ports 41 to 46 are inlet ports.
As schematically shown in
By way of example, the incoming oxidiser exiting port 32 on
Similarly during alternate periods of time, the cycle is reversed: the first fuel is injected through burners 21 to 26 instead of burners 11 to 16, the oxidiser enters through the second ports 41 to 46 and the combustion products are finally exhausted through the first ports 31 to 36, the burners 11 to 16 being inactive. Re-circulated combustion products also recirculate in a substantially vertical loop above the flame having a reversed orientation.
The first and second ports 31 to 36 and 41 to 46 and the associated first and second burners 11 to 16 and 21 to 26 are thus alternately and repeatedly used as burners to mix first fuel with an oxidiser (usually air or oxygen). The changeover between the first and second sets of N first and second ports 31 to 36 and 41 to 46 and correspondingly the first and second sets of N first and second burners 11 to 16 and 21 to 26 occurs cyclically, with a cycle time being e.g. between 10 and 30 minutes, more specifically between 20 and 30 minutes. A first fraction X1 of fuel is injected into the melting chamber 8 via the alternately operated first and second burners 11 to 16 and 21 to 26. On a melting furnace not equipped with auxiliary fuel injectors of the present invention, X1 equals 1.
Advantageously, first and second regenerative heat exchangers (not shown) are operatively associated with the first and second ports 31 to 36 and 41 to 46. The ambient combustion air is pre-heated in a first regenerative heat exchanger re-heated by hot combustion products of a preceding cycle. The pre-heated oxidiser (air) is then directed towards the first ports 31 to 36 of the first burners 11 to 16. The resulting combustion products are then directed towards a second regenerative heat exchanger (not shown) in order to re-heat it and pre-heat oxidiser to be applied through the second ports 41 to 46 of the second burners 21 to 26 during the next cycle.
During a cycle in which the first burners are operated to introduce fuel, the first burners introduce a first fraction X1 of fuel into the melting chamber. The jets J1 of the introduction of fuel is represented on
According to an embodiment, auxiliary fuel injectors 51 to 56 are arranged in the cross-fired melting furnace 10, in the roof 6, for each couple of oppositely arranged first and second ports 31, 41; . . . ; 36, 46.
The auxiliary fuel injectors may be arranged along a centre line of a couple of ports.
The auxiliary fuel injectors 51 to 56 are arranged so that they inject, or introduce, in the combustion chamber 8, a second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel, with X2+X1 being equal to 1:
in the direction of the flow of said re-circulating combustion products 104,
without additional oxidiser,
into said re-circulating combustion products, the auxiliary fuel injector being located at a point where said second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel will mix with the recirculating combustion products, before reaching incoming oxidiser introduced by a port,
the velocities of the jets introducing the fraction X1 of fuel and the fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel being adapted so that the sum of their corresponding jet momenta is comprised between −30% or +30% of a value corresponding to the jet momentum of the fuel when X2 equals zero (and X1 equals 1), and
the energy provided by the quantity of the sum of the first fraction of fuel X1 and the second fraction of fuel X2 being adapted to produce a given required energy for melting said materials without over-fuelling the furnace.
The jets J2 of the introduction of auxiliary fuel is represented on
Among 100% of the first and second fuels (quantity X) injected into the melting chamber 8 through the first and second burners 11 to 16, 21 to 26 and the additional fuel injectors, the fraction X2 of fuel jet emitted by the additional fuel injectors is preferably from 10% to 100% of the sum X.
The fuel injected through the first and second burners 11 to 16, 21 to 26 and the auxiliary fuel injectors may be selected from the group consisting of natural gas, LPG, fuel oil, coke-oven gas, blast furnace gas, reforming gas, biofuel, methane, and hydrogen.
The above mentioned recirculation of combustion products extends in a substantially vertical loop above the flame on a length (measured from the side wall being on the firing side) which has to be known so as to find the optimum location for the auxiliary fuel injectors. Also, the parameters of the injection and the fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel have to be determined in a manner such that the recirculation of combustion products is maintained. The size and strength of the recirculation can be calculated for example using the following equations derived by Thring (mentioned above), Craya (Craya A and Curtet R, ‘On the spreading of a confined jet’, Comptes-rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, Paris, 241, 1955) and others:
in which:
x is the distance from the side wall (firing side) to the point where there is no longer recirculation in the furnace,
h is the hydraulic height of the space between the glass surface, the furnace front and back walls and the furnace roof,
qr is the mass of combustion products recirculating per unit time and per port,
Q is the total mass of fuel and oxidiser entering the furnace per unit time and per port,
G0 is the momentum of the incoming fuel jet(s) (mass flow rate multiplied by velocity), per port,
Ga is the momentum of the incoming oxidiser (mass flow rate multiplied by velocity), per port,
Ginf is the momentum of the outgoing hot exhaust gases (their mass flow rate multiplied by their mean velocity when they fill the furnace chamber), per port, and
m is a dimensionless number (Craya Curtet number) that relates to the relative jet momenta of the incoming fuel and oxidiser flows, and the outgoing combustion products.
The height of the furnace is generally determined to be sufficient to allow significant recirculation of combustion products. As far as the mass flow rate of recirculating combustion products is concerned, typical values for natural gas as fuel and for air as oxidiser together with typical air and gas velocities, when applied to equation (2), suggest that the mass of exhaust gases recirculating in a substantially vertical loop below the roof and above the flame is approximately equal to the incoming mass flow of fuel and oxidiser. This confirms that there is sufficient recirculation to carry up to 100% of the fuel flow entering the furnace (about 1/20th of the total mass flow entering the furnace) without affecting the furnace flow pattern and furnace operation.
However, as fuel is removed from the burners to supply the Auxiliary fuel injectors (for example because the second fraction X2 is introduced, the first fraction X1 has to be reduced), equation (2) indicates that the recirculation rate will eventually fall to values that are too low to carry the auxiliary fuel and maintain the furnace flow patterns, if the injectors are not in the above defined direction and if they do not inject with the above mentioned velocity.
According to a first embodiment which is illustrated in
The auxiliary fuel injectors 51 to 56 may comprise a swirl chamber to spread the fuel in the re-circulation loop of combustion products.
For improved effectiveness, for example in multi-port cross-fired furnaces and hence to improve the stability of the re-circulating flows, the auxiliary fuel injectors may direct a higher momentum jet of auxiliary fuel in the direction of the recirculated combustion products 104 to maintain and enhance their recirculation and mass flow. This will also allow the use of auxiliary injectors in cross-fired melting furnaces suffering from exhaust port blockages as the years of operation accumulate.
According to a second embodiment which is illustrated in
The first and second auxiliary fuel injectors 61, 71; . . . ; 66, 76 are alternately operable to inject the second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel in the direction of the flow of said re-circulating combustion products 104 and without additional oxidiser. Because the direction of the flow of the re-circulating combustion products will reverse when the firing direction reverses, the first and second auxiliary fuel injectors 61, 71; . . . ; 66, 76 are operable when the corresponding first or second ports (31, 41; . . . ; 36, 46) located in the vicinity of said first or second auxiliary fuel injectors (61, 71; . . . ; 66, 76) are exhaust ports.
It should be noted that in the various embodiments, the velocity of the jet for introducing the second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel may be comprised between 10 and 70 m/s.
According to a variant embodiment, the auxiliary fuel injectors 51 to 56 or 61 to 66 and 71 to 76 each include a device putting into rotation the injected auxiliary fuel to create a swirl effect. This may increase the mixing of fuel with the re-circulating combustion products in the melting chamber 8.
According to another variant embodiment, the auxiliary fuel injectors 51 to 56 or 61 to 66 and 71 to 76 each include a device to adjust or alter the jet momentum or jet impulse or jet velocity of the injected auxiliary fuel.
In alternative embodiments (not shown), the auxiliary injectors may be located in the side walls. In such embodiments, the auxiliary injectors may only be used while the corresponding port on the opposite side wall introduces oxidiser.
Embodiments of the present invention may also relate to a method of melting raw materials by a cross-fired melting furnace 10 which has:
a melting tank 7 for receiving raw materials to be melted and for accommodating a melted materials bath;
a melting chamber 8 located above said melting tank and comprising a first side wall, a second side wall opposite said first side wall, a back wall located at an upstream area of said melting tank, a front wall located at a downstream area of said melting tank, and a roof;
N first ports 31, . . . , 36 being provided in the first side wall in horizontally spaced locations between said back wall and front wall, each of said at least one series of N first ports 31, . . . 36 being associated with a corresponding first burner of a series of N first burners 11, . . . , 16;
N second ports 41, . . . 46 being located in the second side wall in horizontally spaced locations between said back wall and front wall, each of said N second ports being located opposite a first port to define N couples of first and second ports 31, 41, . . . , 36, 46;
wherein re-circulating combustion products flow in a substantially vertical loop above a flame the method comprising:
introducing a first fraction X1 of fuel into said melting chamber via said first burners,
introducing a second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel, with X2+X1 being equal to 1, using at least one auxiliary fuel injector 51, the at least one auxiliary fuel injector being arranged in the cross-fired melting furnace in said roof or in the side wall not comprising burners introducing fuel so that the at least one auxiliary fuel injector introduces the second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel,
in the direction of the flow of said re-circulating combustion products 104,
without additional oxidiser,
into said re-circulating combustion products, the auxiliary fuel injector being located at a point where said second fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel will mix with the recirculating combustion products, before reaching incoming oxidiser introduced by a port,
the velocities of the jets introducing the fraction X1 of fuel and the fraction X2 of auxiliary fuel being adapted so that the sum of their corresponding jet momenta is comprised between −30% or +30% of a value corresponding to the jet momentum of the fuel when X2 equals zero (and X1 equals 1), and
the energy provided by the quantity of the sum of the first fraction of fuel X1 and the second fraction of fuel X2 being adapted to produce a given required energy for melting said materials without over-fuelling the furnace.
Generally speaking, the invention provides a simplification in the manufacturing process, increases performance and reduces cost.
Although preferred embodiments have been shown and described, it should be understood that any changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims. Thus the features of the different embodiments may be combined.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17305980.9 | Jul 2017 | FR | national |
This application claims priority as a continuation of International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2018/069813 filed on Jul. 20, 2018, which claims priority to French Patent Application No. 17305980.9 filed on Jul. 21, 2017. Both of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/EP2018/069813 | Jul 2018 | US |
| Child | 16747395 | US |
