Method of modifying a phosphorus-containing zeolite catalyst

Abstract
A method of modifying a phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst is carried out by contacting an unbound and calcined phosphorus-treated pentasil zeolite with water in a water treatment wherein at least a portion of the water is in a liquid phase. The water treatment is sufficient to remove at least 80% by weight or more of phosphorus from the phosphorus-treated zeolite and provide an increase in the pore volume of the zeolite by at least 50% prior to the water treatment to form a modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst. A zeolite catalyst is also provided in the form of a phosphorus-containing pentasil zeolite having a phosphorus content of 7.5% or less by weight of zeolite and a 27Al MAS NMR peak at 50 ppm that is greater than any other 27Al MAS NMR and a pore volume of 0.2 ml/g or more.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention relates generally to phosphorus-containing zeolite catalysts and their preparation.


BACKGROUND

A zeolite is a crystalline hydrated aluminosilicate that has a tetrahedra structure of the formula TO4. The tetrandra structure is in the form of a three-dimensional network that is formed by sharing oxygen atoms and wherein T represents tetravalent atoms, such as silicon, and trivalent atoms, such as aluminum.


In the crystalline structure of the zeolite there are pores and channels which may be interconnected. The dimensions and configuration of these pores and channels allow access of molecules of certain sizes or configurations, thus promoting the selectivity to certain products when the zeolite is used as a catalyst. Elements, such as metals, may also be deposited on or incorporated with the zeolite to facilitate selectivity or catalytic enhancement of the zeolite catalyst.


In certain instances phosphorus is used to modify the zeolite structure. In phosphorus treatment of zeolites, the zeolite is modified so that the pores and channels are occluded by various materials resulting from the treatment. This typically includes phosphates, phosphates bonded with non-framework aluminum and silicon, and amorphous alumina that is present as debris within the zeolite pore channels. Such catalysts have been shown to have improved catalysts characteristics in certain applications. Furthermore, the framework aluminum of the zeolite is decreased as a result of the phosphorus treatment and/or calcination.


The present invention is directed to a method of modifying phosphorus-containing or phosphorus-treated pentasil zeolite catalysts that have unique properties and characteristics that differ from conventional phosphorus-containing or phosphorus-treated zeolite catalysts.


SUMMARY

A method of modifying a phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst is performed by contacting an unbound and calcined phosphorus-treated pentasil zeolite with water in a water treatment. In the water treatment, at least a portion of the water is in a liquid phase to facilitate removal of at least 70% by weight or more of phosphorus from the phosphorus-treated zeolite and provide an increase in the pore volume of the zeolite by at least 50% prior to the water treatment to form a modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst.


In particular embodiments, the phosphorus-treated zeolite has a phosphorus content of from 1% to 25% by weight of the zeolite prior to the water treatment. In other embodiments, the phosphorus-treated zeolite has a phosphorus content of from 5% to 15% by weight of the zeolite prior to the water treatment.


In certain embodiments, the modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst may exhibit an increase in any 27Al MAS NMR peak at 50 ppm compared to the phosphorus-treated zeolite prior to the water treatment.


The pentasil zeolite may contain 10-membered ring pore openings. In certain instances, the zeolite may have a silica/alumina molar ratio of at least 25 or more and in others the zeolite may have a silica/alumina molar ratio of at least 200 or more.


The water treatment may occur at a temperature of from 25° C. to 120° C.


In certain embodiments, the final phosphorus content of the modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst is from 3% or less by weight of the zeolite. In other embodiments the final phosphorus content of the modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst may be from 0.5% to 2% by weight of the zeolite.


In certain instances, the modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst may have a pore volume of 0.2 ml/g or more.


In particular applications, the water of the water treatment may be saturated steam or a mixture of liquid water and gas. In some applications, the water of the water treatment may be in a slurry. In some embodiments the phosphorus-treated zeolite is steamed with superheated steam prior to the water treatment.


A method of preparing a zeolite catalyst is also performed by treating a pentasil zeolite with a phosphorus compound prior to combining with any optional binder with the zeolite to form a phosphorus-treated zeolite having a phosphorus content of 5% or more by weight of the zeolite. The unbound phosphorus-treated zeolite is calcined. The unbound and calcined phosphorus-treated zeolite is contacted with water in a water treatment wherein at least a portion of the water is in a liquid phase to facilitate removal of at least 80% by weight or more of phosphorus from the phosphorus-treated zeolite and provide an increase the pore volume of the zeolite by at least 50% prior to the water treatment to form a modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst.


In particular embodiments, the phosphorus-treated zeolite has a phosphorus content of from 1% to 25% by weight of the zeolite prior to the water treatment. In other embodiments, the phosphorus-treated zeolite has a phosphorus content of from 5% to 15% by weight of the zeolite prior to the water treatment.


In certain embodiments, the modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst may exhibit an increase in any 27Al MAS NMR peak at 50 ppm compared to the phosphorus-treated zeolite prior to the water treatment.


The pentasil zeolite may contain 10-membered ring pore openings. In certain instances, the zeolite may have a silica/alumina molar ratio of at least 25 or more and in others the zeolite may have a silica/alumina molar ratio of at least 200 or more.


The water treatment may occur at a temperature of from 25° C. to 120° C.


In certain embodiments, the final phosphorus content of the modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst is from 3% or less by weight of the zeolite. In other embodiments the final phosphorus content of the modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst may be from 0.5% to 2% by weight of the zeolite.


In certain instances, the modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst may have a pore volume of 0.2 ml/g or more.


In certain applications, the water of the water treatment may be saturated steam or a mixture of liquid water and gas. In some applications, the water of the water treatment may be in a slurry. In some embodiments the phosphorus-treated zeolite is steamed with superheated steam prior to the water treatment.


In particular embodiments, the unbound phosphorus-treated zeolite is calcined at a temperature of 400° C. or higher prior to the water treatment.


The invention further includes a zeolite catalyst in the form of a phosphorus-containing zeolite having a phosphorus content of 7.5% or less by weight of zeolite and a 27Al MAS NMR peak at 50 ppm that is greater than any other 27Al MAS NMR peak and a pore volume of 0.2 ml/g or more.


In specific embodiments, the phosphorus-containing zeolite has a phosphorus content of from 0.1% to 4.5% by weight of the zeolite.


The pentasil zeolite may contain 10-membered ring pore openings. In specific embodiments the zeolite is a ZSM-5 zeolite.


In certain instances, the zeolite may have a silica/alumina molar ratio of at least 25 or more and in others the zeolite may have a silica/alumina molar ratio of at least 200 or more.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, in which:



FIG. 1 is a plot of X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns for a NH4-ZSM-5 zeolite and a P-ZSM-5 zeolite (Samples A and B);



FIG. 2 is a plot of 27Al MAS NMR spectra for precursor Samples A and B;



FIG. 3 is a plot of 27Al MAS NMR spectra for precursor Sample B and catalyst Samples C, D, E, and F, which are P-ZSM-5 zeolites slurried with water at different temperatures;



FIG. 4 is a plot of 27Al MAS NMR spectra for Sample B and catalysts Samples G and I, which are both P-ZSM-5 zeolites steamed and subsequently treated in a water treatment; and



FIG. 5 is a plot of 27Al MAS NMR spectra for precursor Sample B and comparative catalyst Samples K, L and N, which are P-ZSM-5 zeolites that are steamed and cooled under H2 flow without any water treatment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The zeolites in the present invention are those from the family of pentasil zeolites that contain five membered ring units or pentasil units in the framework structure. Such zeolites include ZSM-5, ZSM-11, ZSM-23, ferrierite, mordenite, etc. In particular, the zeolite may be a pentasil zeolite that contains 10-membered ring pore openings in the structure. Zeolites with 10-membered ring pore openings are also known as medium pore zeolites. Examples of such pentasil zeolite containing 10-membered ring pore openings or medium pores are ZSM-5, ZSM-11, etc.


Silicalite also constitutes a pentasil zeolite having 10-membered ring pore openings. Silicalites are isotypic or have crystalline structures that are the same or similar to ZSM-5 or MFI (International Zeolite Association nomenclature of ZSM-5) aluminosilicate zeolites. For instance, U.S. Pat. No. 4,061,724, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes, describes such compounds. Such silica compounds are known in the art as “silicalites.” Silicalites are also later described in the article presented in Nature, Vol. 271, Silicalite, A New Hydrophobic Crystalline Silica Molecular Sieve, E. M. Flanigen, et al., (February 1978), pp. 512-516, which is herein incorporated by reference for all purposes. As used herein, the term “silicalite” is meant to refer to those compositions described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,061,724. Such silicalites are formed from precursors of silica materials that contain little or no alumina (Al2O3).


Of the pentasil zeolites, ZSM-5 zeolite is one of the most versatile and commonly used zeolites as a catalyst in various reactions. Because of this, the invention has particular application to ZSM-5 zeolites and so is used and discussed herein as an exemplary pentasil zeolite catalyst. The ZSM-5 zeolites and their preparation are described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,702,886, which is herein incorporated by reference. The invention has application to other pentasil zeolites, however, such as those previously discussed. The ZSM-5 zeolite has two-dimensional pore structure consisting of straight channels (5.4 Å×5.6 Å) that are intersected by sinusoidal channels (5.1 Å×5.7 Å) with a maximum diameter of about 9 Å at the intersection.


ZSM-5 zeolites are aluminosilicates that contain both silicon and aluminum in the crystalline structure. In the present invention, the starting ZSM-5 zeolite may have a silica/alumina molar ratio of from about 25 or higher, more particularly from about 25 to about 1000 or higher prior to modification, more particularly, the silica/alumina molar ratio may be from about 25, 30, 50, 80, 100, 200, 250, 280, 300, 350, 400, 500 to about 1000 or more, including any and all data points within such range and the end points of such range. In certain applications, the ZSM-5 zeolite may have a silica/alumina molar ratio of from about 200 or more, and still more particularly from about 200 to about 400 or more, prior to modification. The starting ZSM-5 zeolite may be an NH4+ or H+ form and may contain traces of other cations.


It should be understood that with respect to any concentration or amount range listed or described in the summary and detailed description as being useful, suitable, or the like, it is intended to include every concentration or amount within the range, including the end points, and is to be considered as having been specifically stated. For example, “a range of from 1 to 10” is to be read as indicating each and every possible number along the continuum between about 1 and about 10. Thus, even if specific data points within the range, or even no data points within the range, are explicitly identified or refer to only a specific few, it is to be understood that the inventors appreciate and understand that any and all data points within the range are to be considered to have been specified, and that the inventors are in possession of the entire range and all points within the range.


To provide various properties to the ZSM-5 zeolite or other pentasil zeolite, the zeolite is modified by treating it with phosphorus-containing compounds. In the present invention, the zeolite is modified with phosphorus. Such phosphorus-containing compounds may include, but are not limited to, phosphonic, phosphinous, phosphorus and phosphoric acids, salts and esters of such acids and phosphorous halides. In particular, phosphoric acid (H3PO4) and ammonium hydrogen phosphate ((NH4)2HPO4) may be used as the phosphorus-containing compound. Such phosphorus-treated catalysts may contain phosphorus (P) in an amount of from about 1 wt % to about 25 wt % or more by weight of the zeolite after the phosphorus treatment. In certain embodiments, the phosphorus content may be from about 5 wt % to 15 wt % or more by weight of the zeolite after phosphorus treatment. In other embodiments, the phosphorus content may be from about 7 wt % to 12 wt % by weight of the zeolite after phosphorus treatment.


The phosphorus treatment may be carried out by various techniques. This may include aqueous phosphorus treatment of the zeolite. The treatment may include slurry evaporation, wet incipient and spray-dry methods. Solid-solid mixing of the zeolite and a phosphorus compound followed by bringing the mixture in contact with water as a liquid or vapor phase may also be used.


In slurry evaporation, the phosphorus may be incorporated into the catalyst by preparing a slurry of the zeolite and an aqueous solution of the phosphorus compound. Heating of the slurry may be used to facilitate treatment of the zeolite and to evaporate liquids. Heating of the slurry to temperatures of from about 25° C. or more, with from about 70° C. to about 100° C. being suitable in most instances. The slurry may also be stirred or agitated during this step to ensure uniform treatment. Heating the zeolite slurry to near complete evaporation of the liquid causes the formation of dough which can be dried or calcined to form powder or particles. The evaporation of the liquid from the zeolite slurry can be alternatively achieved by using a spray-dry technique.


In the wet incipient method, an aqueous solution of the phosphorus compound is added, such as by spraying, to dry zeolite without forming a slurry. The dry zeolite, which may be initially in the form of a powder, may be mixed with the phosphorus compound or its aqueous solution. If necessary, water may be added to the mixture of zeolite powder and phosphorus containing compound or its solution to facilitate homogeneous or uniform interaction between them.


The unbound phosphorus-treated zeolite is then calcined at a temperature of about 250° C. or more, more particularly, a temperature from about 300° C. to about 700° C., and more particularly from about 400° C. to about 570° C., in an environment containing oxygen, typically air. Calcining may take place over time, typically from several minutes to one hour or more. Calcining may also take place by gradually increasing the temperature over time.


After calcination, the zeolite may optionally undergo a steaming step using superheated steam (i.e., dry steam or steam with no liquid water present). As used herein, the expressions “steaming,” “steamed,” and similar expressions are meant to refer to the contacting of the zeolite with such superheated steam and are to be distinguished from the water treatment(s) discussed later on unless expressly stated so or as may be otherwise apparent from the context. The catalyst may be steamed at a temperature of 200° C. or more, more particularly at a temperature of from about 200° C. to about 600° C. or higher. Pressures during steaming may typically range from atmospheric to about 50 psig (344.7 kPa) or 100 psig or more. Steaming may be carried out from a few minutes to several hours. The steaming may occur in the presence of hydrogen gas (H2), air or other inert gas flow. In other embodiments no steaming may be conducted after calcinations and prior to the water treatment as will now be discussed.


The unbound phosphorus-treated calcined zeolite powder, with or without steaming, is modified using a novel water treatment that alters the characteristics and properties of the phosphorus-containing zeolite. The water treatment is carried out by contacting the calcined phosphorus-treated zeolite powder with liquid water. This may be in the form of liquid water or a stream containing essentially wet or liquid water. This may include saturated steam or a mixture of liquid water and a gas, such as water and hydrogen gas. Accordingly, as used herein, the expression “water treatment” and similar expressions are meant to encompass the treatment of the unbound phosphorus-containing zeolite powder with liquid water or a combination or mixture of liquid water and steam or other gas and is to be distinguished from “steaming,” as it has been defined and described previously.


In most instances, the water treatment is conducted at a temperature of from above 0° C. to about 100° C., with the pressure conditions being at or around atmospheric pressure conditions or that allow for the presence of some portion of liquid water. There may be other instances, however, where the pressure is below or above atmospheric pressure. In such instances, the liquid water treatment is conducted at a temperature to ensure that the water temperature is at or above the water's freezing point and at or about the boiling point for the particular pressure conditions to ensure that at least a portion (e.g., 1% or more) of the water is in the liquid phase. In many applications, the liquid water treatment is carried out at a temperature of about 25° C. (room temperature) to about 120° C. In certain applications, temperatures of from about 50° C., 60° C. or 70° C. to about 100° C., 110° C. or 120° C. may be used in the water treatment. In certain embodiments, the liquid water treatment may be carried out at a temperature of from about 50 or 60° C. to about 90° C. or 100° C.


The water treatment facilitates the removal of significant amounts of phosphorus from the phosphorus-treated zeolite. In particular, the water treatment should be carried out to facilitate final removal of about 70% by weight or more of phosphorus from the unbound phosphorus-treated zeolite. This amount includes any phosphorus that may be removed by any optional steaming conducted prior to the water treatment. Testing has shown that steaming (i.e., with superheated steam) typically results in less than 20% by weight of phosphorus being removed from the phosphorus-treated zeolite. Thus, steaming alone is insufficient to remove the required amount of phosphorus from the unbound phosphorus-treated zeolite. The water treatment thus facilitates significant amounts of phosphorus being removed from the zeolite. In certain instances, from about 70% to about 90% or more phosphorus is removed from the phosphorus-treated zeolite after the water treatment.


The final amount of phosphorus in the zeolite after water treatment will typically be from 7.5% or less by weight of the zeolite. In certain applications, the amount of phosphorus remaining in the zeolite will be from 0.1% to 4.5% by weight of the zeolite. In other embodiments the phosphorus remaining in the zeolite will be from 0.5 to 2% or 3% by weight of the zeolite.


The water treatment also facilitates altering the pore volume of the unbound phosphorus-treated zeolite. In particular, the water treatment should be carried out in a manner to facilitate an increase of in the pore volume of the zeolite by at least 50% compared to the zeolite prior to the water treatment. In particular embodiments, the pore volume increase may be 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 110%, 120% or more.


Various methods of the water treatment may be used. The water treatment used, however, should be sufficient to provide the properties described herein. In one method of the water treatment, the unbound and calcined phosphorus-treated zeolite, with or without prior steaming, is contacted with a gaseous water treatment wherein the zeolite is contacted with liquid water in a gas stream. In the gaseous water treatment the water may be in the form of saturated steam (i.e., water at boiling point), containing both liquid water and water vapor. The saturated steam may be a pure saturated steam or it may be mixed other non-water gases. The non-water gases may include hydrogen gas or another gas (e.g., N2, CO2, light alkanes, air, etc.), which may be an inert gas, or combination of such gases.


Alternatively, where the water treatment is carried out below the boiling point of water, the gaseous water treatment may utilize a mixture of liquid water and a non-water gas. Such treatment may be carried out by bubbling or passing flowing hydrogen or other gas through liquid water at conditions above the water's freezing point and below or at the water's boiling point so that some amount of the liquid water is entrained within the flowing gas diluent.


In certain embodiments, the gaseous water treatment may take place during cooling that initially starts as a steam treatment where the zeolite is treated with superheated steam at elevated temperatures in a steaming step, but then the temperature is reduced so that the zeolite is eventually contacted and treated with the liquid water as the steam cools to saturated steam and/or liquid water entrained or mixed with a non-water gas stream. The duration of the gaseous water treatment may range from a few minutes to several hours or even days.


In one method for the water treatment, the water treatment is carried out by mixing or immersing the phosphorus-treated zeolite in a liquid water bath or slurry. The immersion time may vary from a few minutes to several hours or even days. In most embodiments, the immersion time will range from about one hour to several hours or days. The immersion may be carried out with or without agitation of the zeolite within the water bath, with the provision that such immersion technique provides the desired final properties described herein.


In another method, the water treatment includes contacting the phosphorus-treated zeolite in a flowing liquid water stream where the water is at least partially in a liquid phase. This may be done by contacting the zeolite in a forced stream containing liquid water. The flowing liquid water stream may also contain a non-water gas diluent. The duration of the flowing liquid stream may range from a few minutes to several hours or even days. The duration times for the flowing liquid stream without the use of any gas diluents may be the same as those for the water bath or may be shorter.


The removal of large amounts of phosphorus from the phosphorus-treated zeolite and the increase in pore volume provided by the water treatments described herein is likely due to the removal of various phosphorus species (hereinafter called debris) from the zeolite channels. Such debris may include occluded phosphates, phosphates bonded with non-framework aluminum and silicon, and amorphous alumina.


In addition to the removal of phosphorus and increase in pore volume of the zeolite, the water treatment also results in an increase in framework or tetrahedral aluminum of the zeolite. This has been confirmed by an exhibited increase in the 27Al MAS NMR peak intensity at 50 ppm, which is assigned to tetrahedral or framework aluminum of the zeolite. Dealumination or a loss of framework or tetrahedral aluminum, which is shown by a decrease in the 27Al MAS NMR peak intensity at 50 ppm, typically results from the phosphorus treatment and calcinations of the zeolite. The increase in tetrahedral or framework aluminum of such modified zeolites is therefore unexpected. The water treatment described herein results in an increase in 27Al MAS NMR peak intensity at 50 ppm, as well as a decrease or disappearance of a strong (doublet) 27Al MAS NMR peak between −10 ppm and −20 ppm that is assigned to octahedral aluminum (non-framework Al). Thus, there is an increase in the ratio of framework aluminum to total aluminum provided by the water treatment. The increased 27Al MAS NMR peak at 50 ppm due to the water treatment may be greater than any other 27Al MAS NMR peak within the spectrum.


Furthermore, this realumination or increase in framework aluminum occurs without the addition of additional reactants or modifying agents. Realumination of certain dealuminated zeolites upon the addition of bases, such as KOH, to provide basic or alkali conditions (pH>7) or with the addition of aluminum isopropoxide, for example, is known. In the present invention, the water treatment may be at acidic or conditions where the pH is from 7 or below, with the lower pH being caused by phosphorus or loosely bound phosphates from the phosphorus treatment, which may make the water used during the water treatment acidic. No added bases (e.g., KOH, NaOH, etc.), acids (e.g., HCl, acetic acid, benzoic acid, H2SO4, nitric acid, mineral acids, etc.), ammonium salts or compounds, added aluminum compounds (e.g., Al(NO3)3, Al2(SO4)3, etc.) or other reactants or modifying agents are needed or may be used during the water treatment.


After the water treatment, any residual water may be separated from the zeolite, such as through filtration, decantation, etc. Further heating to dry the zeolite after the water treatment may also be carried out. Typical drying temperatures may range from about 70° C. to 120° C. and higher.


An additional calcination step may also be employed after the water treatment using the calcination temperatures and times previously discussed.


The water treated phosphorus-modified zeolite can be used as catalyst, and may be optionally bound with a binder to form into a shaped body. The binder materials may include inorganic oxide materials, such as alumina, clay and silica materials. The binder may be used to provide a desired shape to the catalyst, for example, 1/16-inch cylindrical shaped extruded catalyst. In particular, a binder of an aluminum-containing material, such as alumina, clay, aluminum phosphate, silica-alumina or other-aluminum containing material, or their combinations, may be particularly useful. The bound catalyst may contain from about 1 wt % to about 99 wt % of binder material by total weight of the catalyst. In some applications the binder may be present in an amount of from about 10 wt % to about 50 wt % binder by total weight of catalyst.


The water-treated phosphorus-containing zeolite, bound or unbound, may also undergo a further steaming step prior to the initial use as a catalyst. The catalyst may be steamed at a temperature of between 200 and 600° C. or higher before using the catalyst in any reaction. The steaming can be carried out in-situ or ex-situ of the reactor. In other embodiments no further steaming may be conducted after the water treatment.


After drying and/or calcinations and any further steam treatment, the water-treated, phosphorus-containing zeolite may be used as a catalyst for various reactions.


EXAMPLES
Phosphorus Treatment of ZSM-5 Zeolite

The materials used for making the catalysts of the examples are described in Table 1. The starting material was a NH4-ZSM-5 zeolite powder having a SiO2/Al2O3 mole ratio (SAR) of 308 (Sample A, Table 2). The NH4-ZSM-5 powder was treated with phosphoric acid by adding the acid to the zeolite powder while mixing them together. Water was added to make the zeolite powder homogeneously moist. The weight ratio (as-is basis, shown in Table 1) of zeolite:H3PO4:H2O was 1.00:0.48:0.04. The phosphorus-treated ZSM-5 zeolite (herein after called P-ZSM-5) was then calcined using a programmed temperature profile with a maximum temperature of 530° C. for about 2.5 h (Sample B, Table 2). The P-ZSM-5 (Sample B, Table 2) was used as a precursor for preparing Catalyst Samples C—F.












TABLE 1







Component
Source









NH4-ZSM-5 (SAR 308), Moisture 0.15 wt. %a
Zeolyst



Phosphoric acid (H3PO4), 85 wt. % in aqueous
Sigma-Aldrich



Nitric acid (HNO3), ACS Reagent, 70%
Sigma-Aldrich



Water, Deionized (DI)
SABIC lab








aFree Moisture at 110° C. 16 h








Analysis of Parent NH4-ZSM-5 and P-ZSM-5


Both parent NH4-ZSM-5 (Sample A, Table 2) and P-ZSM-5 (Sample B, Table 2) were analyzed for Si, Al, and P, and for specific BET surface area (BET SA) and total pore volume (PVtotal). Elemental analysis of the catalysts was performed by X-ray fluorescence and weight percentage (wt. %) of Si, Al and P, with the results included in Table 2. Multi-point N2 sorption was done at liquid N2 temperature (−196° C.) at P/Po=0.03 to 0.99. The catalyst samples were degassed under vacuum (<20 mTorr) at 300° C. Specific BET SA was calculated using BET method, and PVtotal was calculated from the N2 uptake at P/Po=0.99. As shown in Table 2, the P-ZSM-5 zeolite (Sample B) contained 35.96 wt % Si, 0.23 wt % Al and 8.74 wt % P, and had a BET SA of 182 m2/g and a total pore volume of 0.12 ml/g. Both BET SA and PVtotal of the P-ZSM-5 (Sample B) decreased significantly with the phosphorus treatment of the NH4-ZSM-5 zeolite powder (Sample A).


The X-ray diffraction pattern (XRD) for the parent NH4-ZSM-5 and P-ZSM-5 (Samples A and B, Table 2) were recorded on a Phillips (X-Pert model) diffractometer over a range of 5-55° at a scan rate 2° per minute using CuKα1 radiation. The XRD patterns of the NH4-ZSM-5 and P-ZSM-5 are shown in FIG. 1. In general, the intensities of ZSM-5 peaks decreased for P-ZSM-5 due to phosphorus treatment and calcinations of the zeolite. The decrease of the peak intensity is attributed to the loss of crystallinity or removal of T-atoms from the zeolite structure. The crystallinity of P-ZSM-5 was measured by integrating peak area of the characteristic peaks at 2θ=21.5° to 25°, and then comparing that with the starting NH4-ZSM-5 zeolite. The phosphorus treatment of the zeolite causes the removal of T-atoms resulting in loss of crystallinity (crystallinity of P-ZSM-5 is about 60%). New peaks appeared at 2θ=11.01 and 25.3° and the intensities of peaks at 2θ=21.90 and 32.25° increased after P-modification of the ZSM-5 zeolite. The appearance of the new peaks may be due to the presence of silica-alumino-phosphates (SAPO) and/or aluminophosphates (AlPO) type materials in the P-ZSM-5.













TABLE 2









Composition,




Sample/

wt %
SA,
PVtotal













Catalyst
Description
Si
Al
P
m2/g
mL/g
















A
NH4-ZSM-5, SAR 308
47.16
0.29
N/A
376
0.23


B
P-treated ZSM-5
35.96
0.23
8.74
182
0.12


C
slurried with H2O,
39.21
0.25
5.60
224
0.171



25° C.


D
slurried with H2O,
43.15
0.25
2.69
275
0.241



70° C.


E
slurried with H2O,
43.88
0.24
1.90
283
0.248



84° C.


F
slurried with H2O,
46.13
0.26
1.05
305
0.256



97° C.





N/A = not applicable, that is, sample contains no P






Example 1
Catalyst Samples C-F

A weighed amount of P-ZSM-5 zeolite powder (Sample B) was slurried with water in water treatments for 4 hours at different temperatures to make catalyst Samples C-F (conditions are shown below and in Table 2). The pH of the slurry was about 1.0. The slurry was filtered and dried at a temperature between 90° C. and 110° C. overnight. The samples were analyzed for Si, Al and P by XRF method, for BET SA and PVtotal by N2 sorption (described earlier), and the results are included in Table 2.


Sample C

    • Slurry: 10.05 g P-ZSM-5 (Sample B, Table 2), Water 50 mL
    • Slurry stirred at about 25° C. for about 4 h
    • Filtered, dried at 110° C. overnight


Sample D

    • Slurry: 5.01 g P-ZSM-5 (Sample B, Table 2), Water 50 mL
    • Slurry heated at 70° C., stirred 4 h, maintained slurry volume by adding 70° C.-water
    • Filtered, dried at 90° C. overnight


Sample E

    • Slurry: 2.53 g P-ZSM-5 (Sample B, table 2), Water 40 mL
    • Slurry heated at 84° C., stirred 4 h, maintained slurry volume by adding 84° C.-water
    • Filtered, dried at 90° C. overnight


Sample F

    • Slurry: 10.08 g P-ZSM-5 (Sample B, Table 2), Water 50 mL
    • Slurry heated at 97° C., stirred 4 h, maintained slurry volume by adding 97° C.-water
    • Filtered, dried at 110° C. overnight


Table 3 shows the percentage of phosphorus loss and increase of PVtotal after the P-ZSM-5 (Sample B) was slurried with water at different conditions. The P-ZSM-5 lost about 40% P resulting in an increase about 40% total pore volume when the zeolite was slurried with liquid water at about 25° C. (Sample C). However, when the P-ZSM-5 was slurried at 70° C. (Sample D), at 84° C. (Sample E), and at 97° C. (Sample F) the P-ZSM-5 zeolite lost about 70% or more P of its initial content. When the P-ZSM-5 was slurried in a water treatment at 70° C. or higher, BET SA was found to increase by about 50% or more and also total the pore volume (PVtotal was increased by about 100% or more relative to the P-ZSM-5. Table 4 shows the change in BET SA and PVtotal compared to the parent zeolite (Sample A) and P-ZSM-5 (Sample B).











TABLE 3









Phosphorus, wt. %












Catalyst
Before Slurried
After Slurried
% P Loss







C
8.74
5.60
35.9



D
8.74
2.69
69.2



E
8.74
1.90
78.3



F
8.74
1.05
88.0




















TABLE 4









Change in BET SA
Change in PVtotal
















% Change relative

% Change
% Change


Sample/
BET SA,
% Change relative
to P-treated
PVtotal,
relative to
relative to P-


Catalyst
m2/g
to parent zeolite
zeolite
ml/g
parent zeolite
treated zeolite
















A
376


0.231




B
182
−52

0.120
−48


C
224
−40
23
0.171
−26
43


D
275
−27
51
0.241
4
101


E
283
−25
55
0.248
7
107


F
305
−19
68
0.256
11
113









Example 2
Catalyst Samples G-I

A P-treated ZSM-5 (Sample B) was pressed, crushed and sieved to obtain 20-40 mesh zeolite for loading in a stainless steel (SS) tube reactor for steaming at various conditions. A weighed amount of sized P-ZSM-5 was loaded in a reactor, dried at 200° C. (at atmospheric pressure) for about an hour under H2 flow. To prepare catalyst Samples G, H and I, the P-ZSM-5 (Sample B) was steamed with superheated steam by flowing H2O and H2 via a vaporizer at 200° C. and maintaining the catalyst bed temperature at 200° C., or 400° C. or 600° C. Catalyst loading, H2O and H2 flow rates, temperature, reactor inlet pressure, and steaming time are shown in Table 5. The steamed P-ZSM-5 catalyst was then cooled to room temperature while H2O/H2 flow continued overnight at room temperature. The continued flow of H2O/H2 flow during cooling constituted the water treatment. Note that the vaporizer was turned off while the steamed catalyst was treated with H2O/H2 flow during the water treatment at room temperature or during cooling of the catalyst.












TABLE 5









Steaming Conditions
Post Steaming Conditions

















Sample/

H2,
H2O,
Temp,
P,

H2,
H2O,
Temp,



Catalyst
P-ZSM-5, g
cc/min
g/min
° C.
psig
Time, h
cc/min
g/min
° C.
Time, h





G
4.23
459
0.06
200
50
1
459
0.06
25
16


H
4.23
459
0.06
400
50
1
459
0.06
25
16


I
4.23
459
0.12
600
50
1
459
0.12
25
16









Table 6 lists the phosphorus content and total pore volume of the modified P-ZSM-5 of catalyst Samples G, H and I that were each steamed and contacted with H2O/H2 while the steamed P-ZSM-5 was cooled to room temperature with a continuous H2O/H2 flow at room temperature. This post steaming contact of the P-ZSM-5 zeolite with the H2O/H2 flow while cooling constituted the water treatment. As seen in Table 6, post treatment of the steamed P-ZSM-5 catalysts (Samples G, H and I) with the H2O/H2 flow resulted in a loss of about 90% phosphorus for each sample. As shown in Table 7, BET SA was found to increase by about 50% or more and the total pore volume also increased by about 100% when the steamed P/ZSM-5 catalyst was contacted with H2O/H2 while cooling to room temperature. The steamed P-ZSM-5 zeolite was contacted under continuous flow of H2O/H2 during cooling from steaming temperature to about 25° C. As is shown in the comparative examples described later on, if the steamed P-ZSM-5 is not cooled under H2O/H2 flow, but rather cooled under H2 flow without water, a significant difference was observed in P loss and PVtotal change.











TABLE 6









Phosphorus, wt. %













Before Steaming &
After Steaming &
%



Catalyst
Post Steaming
Post Steaming
P Loss







G
8.74
0.74
91.5



H
8.74
0.80
90.8



I
8.74
0.74
91.5




















TABLE 7









Change in BET SA
Change in PVtotal















% Change
% Change

% Change
% Change


Sample/
BET SA,
relative to
relative to P-
PVtotal,
relative to
relative to P-


Catalyst
m2/g
parent zeolite
treated zeolite
ml/g
parent zeolite
treated zeolite
















A
376


0.231




B
182
−52

0.120
−48


G
288
−23
58
0.233
1
94


H
295
−22
62
0.251
9
110


I
307
−18
69
0.248
7
107










MAS NMR of 27Al of Samples


Solid state Magic Angle Spinning (MAS) NMR spectra of NH4-ZSM-5 and P-ZSM-5 zeolite (Samples A and B) were recorded with 400 MHz spectrometer (27Al at 104.5 MHz) at room temperature. The samples were packed in silicon nitride rotors (Si3N4) and spun at 13 to KHz sample spinning (about 800000 rpm). A 10 degree tip and recycle delay of 0.5 s were used to avoid saturation. About 4000 to 10000 scans were accumulated to signal average and improve signal/noise ratio. Proton decoupling was not employed. All spectra were referenced to aluminum chloride hexahydrate (run separately in a tube) at 0.0 ppm on the chemical shift scale.


The results for Samples A and B are presented in FIG. 2. A sharp strong peak at around 50 ppm can be seen for the NH4-ZSM-5 zeolite attributed to structural tetrahedral aluminum. The peak at about 50 ppm decreased significantly when the zeolite powder was treated with phosphoric acid and calcined, suggesting that the phosphoric acid treatment of ZSM-5 removed the framework aluminum appreciably. The adjacent peak (30-40 ppm) is due to severely distorted but still in the framework aluminum atoms, most likely either 3 or 5 coordination with oxygens. Also, a weak peak around 0 ppm was observed and may be assigned to amorphous alumina. The biggest peak (doublet) in the spectrum between −10 ppm and −20 ppm, which was centered at about −14 ppm (hereinafter “the −14 ppm peak”), is from octahedrally coordinated aluminum atoms that are formed when tetrahedrally coordinated framework aluminum is removed from the zeolite framework by the phosphate modification.



FIG. 3 shows 27Al MAS NMR spectra of P-ZSM-5 (Sample B), and catalyst Samples C-F. FIG. 3 shows that the peak at about 50 ppm increased with the decrease of the −14 ppm peak when the P-ZSM-5 was slurried in a water treatment at different conditions. Note that 27Al MAS NMR spectra were recorded with somewhat varied amounts of samples. In order to compare Al peaks, the peak integrals (at 50 ppm) for parent NH4-ZSM-5 (Sample A) was used as a base case; peaks of the other samples or catalysts were then integrated and were counted per unit mass as counts per milligram (cpm). The cpm therefore can be used as relative measure of Al content (to Sample A). The cpm of catalyst Samples C-F and G and I for tetrahedral Al and for octahedral Al are given in Table 8. Spectrum 27Al MAS NMR for Sample H was unavailable. In general, when P-ZSM-5 (Sample B) was slurried with water at different conditions, and also when the steamed P-ZSM-5 was brought in contact with H2O/H2 while being cooled to room temperature, the tetrahedral aluminum increased with the decrease of octahedral aluminum. Also, the ratio of Altetra/Altotal for P-ZSM-5 was about 0.12 for Sample B, was 0.48-0.63 for Samples D-F, and was 0.80 for each of Samples G and I.













TABLE 8





Sample/






Catalyst
Description
Altetra
Alocta
Altetra/Altotal



















A
NH4-ZSM-5, SAR 308
17.4
0
1.00


B
P-treated ZSM-5
0.7a
5.2
0.12


C
slurried with H2O, 25° C.
1.2
4.6
0.21


D
slurried with H2O, 70° C.
4.2
4.6
0.48


E
slurried with H2O, 84° C.
4.1
3.1
0.57


F
slurried with H2O, 98° C.
4.1
2.4
0.63


G
steamed 200° C., post treated
3.3
0.8
0.80



with H2O


I
steamed 600° C., post treated
4.4
1.1
0.80



with H2O






aCounts per mg under peak(s) between about 50 ppm and −10 ppm was about 1.7







Comparative Example 3
Preparation and Analysis of Comparative Catalyst Samples J-O

To form Comparative Samples J-O, the P-ZSM-5 zeolite powder of Sample B was pressed, crushed and sieved to obtain 20-40 mesh P-ZSM-5 zeolite for loading in a stainless steel (SS) tube reactor for steaming at various conditions. In a typical treatment, 4.23 g sized P-ZSM-5 was loaded in a reactor, dried at 200° C. (at atmospheric pressure) for about an hour under H2 flow. The P-ZSM-5 was steamed at a temperature of between 200° C. and 600° C. by flowing H2O and H2 via a vaporizer at 200° C. Sample loading, H2O and H2 flow rates, temperature, reactor inlet pressure, and steaming time are shown in Table 9. The steamed P-ZSM-5 samples were cooled to room temperature under a H2 purge without H2O, and the H2 purge was continued overnight (about 16 h) before removing the steamed catalysts from the reactor for analysis. Table 9 lists the steaming and post steaming conditions for Comparative Catalysts J-O.


Tables 10 and 11 list the phosphorus content and pore volume before and after steaming for each of Comparative Samples J-O. Comparative Samples J-O showed about 20% or less P loss and about 25% or less increase of PVtotal. This is very different when compared to Samples G, H and I where the steamed P-ZSM-5 was cooled under a combined H2O/H2 flow and resulted in a significantly decrease of P and increase of PVtotal.



FIG. 5 shows MAS NMR spectra of 27Al for P-ZSM-5 (Sample B) and Comparative Samples K, L and N that were obtained by steaming Sample B without a water treatment. The weak peaks at 50 ppm (assigned to tetrahedral Al) for Comparative Samples K, L and N remained almost unchanged. The counts per milligram for Altetra for Comparative Samples J-O are also shown in Table 12 and show no increase in Altetra compared to Sample B.












TABLE 9










Post Steaming



Steaming Conditions
Conditions
















Comparative

H2,
H2O,
temp.,
P,

H2,
temp.,



Catalyst
P-ZSM-5, g
cc/min
g/min
° C.
psig
time, h
cc/min
° C.
time, h



















J
1.29
459
0.04
200
atm.
16
840
25
16


K
4.23
459
0.06
200
50
1
459
25
16


L
4.23
459
0.06
400
50
1
459
25
16


M
4.23
459
0.06
550
50
363
459
25
16


N
4.23
459
0.06
600
50
1
459
25
16


O
1.30
459
0.06
600
50
16
459
25
16

















TABLE 10







Comparative
Phosphorus, wt. %










Catalyst
Before Steaming
After Steaming
% P Loss













J
8.74
8.52
2.5


K
8.74
7.74
11.4


L
8.74
7.44
14.9


M
8.74
7.07
19.1


N
8.74
8.55
2.2


O
8.74
7.26
16.9



















TABLE 11









Change in BET SA
Change in PVtotal















% change
% change

% change
% change


Comparative
BET SA,
relative to
relative to P-

relative to
relative to P-


Sample
m2/g
parent zeolite
treated zeolite
PVtotal, ml/g
parent zeolite
treated zeolite
















A
376


0.231




B
182
−52

0.120
−48


J
182
−52
0
0.124
−46
3


K
183
−51
1
0.134
−42
12


L
208
−45
14
0.149
−35
24


M
202
−46
11
0.148
−36
23


N
183
−51
1
0.130
−44
8


O
210
−44
15
0.134
−42
12


















TABLE 12





Comparative Sample
Altetra
Alocta

















B
0.7a
5.2


J
1.01
5.72


K
b, c
4.98


L
0.85b
4.98


M
b, c
2.29


N
b
3.53


O
1.09
3.82






aCounts per mg under peak(s) between about 50 ppm and −10 ppm was about 1.7




bTraces or not measurable;




cWeak broad peak between 50 ppm and −10 ppm







While the invention has been shown in only some of its forms, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that it is not so limited, but is susceptible to various changes and modifications without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is appropriate that the appended claims be construed broadly and in a manner consistent with the scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method of modifying a phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst comprising: contacting an unbound and calcined phosphorus-treated pentasil zeolite with water at a temperature of 70° C. to 120° C. in a water treatment to form a modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst;wherein the zeolite has a pore volume prior to water treatment; andwherein at least a portion of the water is in a liquid phase to facilitate removal of at least 70% by weight or more of phosphorus from the phosphorus-treated zeolite and to provide an increase in the pore volume of the zeolite by at least 50%.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein: the phosphorus-treated zeolite has a phosphorus content of from 1% to 25% by weight of the zeolite prior to the water treatment.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein: the phosphorus-treated zeolite has a phosphorus content of from 5% to 15% by weight of the zeolite prior to the water treatment.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein: the modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst exhibits an increase in any 27Al MAS NMR peak at 50 ppm compared to the phosphorus-treated zeolite prior to the water treatment.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein: the zeolite has a silica/alumina molar ratio of at least 25 or more.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein: the zeolite has a silica/alumina molar ratio of at least 200 or more.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising stirring during the water treatment.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein: the final phosphorus content of the modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst is from 3% or less by weight of the zeolite.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein: the final phosphorus content of the modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst is from 0.5% to 2% by weight of the zeolite.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein: the modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst has a pore volume of 0.2 ml/g or more.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein: the water of the water treatment is saturated steam or a mixture of liquid water and gas.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein: the water of the water treatment is in a slurry.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein: the phosphorus-treated zeolite is steamed with superheated steam prior to the water treatment.
  • 14. A method of preparing a zeolite catalyst comprising: treating a pentasil zeolite with a phosphorus compound prior to combining with any optional binder with the zeolite to form a phosphorus-treated zeolite having a phosphorus content of 5% or more by weight of the zeolite;calcining the unbound phosphorus-treated zeolite;contacting the unbound and calcined phosphorus-treated zeolite with water at a temperature of 70° C. to 120° C. in a water treatment to form a modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst;wherein the zeolite has a pore volume prior to water treatment; andwherein at least a portion of the water is in a liquid phase to facilitate removal of at least 80% by weight or more of phosphorus from the phosphorus-treated zeolite and to provide an increase the pore volume of the zeolite by at least 50%.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein: the phosphorus-treated zeolite has a phosphorus content of from 1% to 25% by weight of the zeolite prior to the water treatment.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, wherein: the phosphorus-treated zeolite has a phosphorus content of from 5% to 15% by weight of the zeolite prior to the water treatment.
  • 17. The method of claim 14, wherein: the modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst exhibits an increase in any 27Al MAS NMR peak at 50 ppm compared to the phosphorus-treated zeolite prior to the water treatment.
  • 18. The method of claim 14, wherein: the zeolite has a silica/alumina molar ratio of at least 25 or more.
  • 19. The method of claim 14, wherein: the zeolite has a silica/alumina molar ratio of at least 200 or more.
  • 20. The method of claim 14, further comprising stirring during the water treatment.
  • 21. The method of claim 14, wherein: the final phosphorus content of the modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst is from 3% or less by weight of the zeolite.
  • 22. The method of claim 14, wherein: the final phosphorus content of the modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst is from 0.5% to 2% by weight of the zeolite.
  • 23. The method of claim 14, wherein: the modified phosphorus-treated zeolite catalyst has a pore volume of 0.2 ml/g or more.
  • 24. The method of claim 14, wherein: the water of the water treatment is saturated steam or a mixture of liquid water and gas.
  • 25. The method of claim 14, wherein: the water of the water treatment is in a slurry.
  • 26. The method of claim 14, wherein: the phosphorus-treated zeolite is steamed with superheated steam prior to the water treatment.
  • 27. The method of claim 14, wherein: the unbound phosphorus-treated zeolite is calcined at a temperature of 400° C. or higher prior to the water treatment.
US Referenced Citations (270)
Number Name Date Kind
3562345 Mitsche Feb 1971 A
3702886 Argauer et al. Nov 1972 A
3950242 Garwood et al. Apr 1976 A
3962364 Young Jun 1976 A
3965207 Weinstein Jun 1976 A
4002697 Chen Jan 1977 A
4025606 Acres May 1977 A
4061724 Grose et al. Dec 1977 A
4080395 Butter Mar 1978 A
4080396 Butter Mar 1978 A
4086287 Kaeding et al. Apr 1978 A
4100215 Chen Jul 1978 A
4115424 Unland et al. Sep 1978 A
4140726 Unland et al. Feb 1979 A
4152364 Chu May 1979 A
4250345 Chu Feb 1981 A
4278827 Chu et al. Jul 1981 A
4363750 Rozovsky et al. Dec 1982 A
4377718 Sato et al. Mar 1983 A
4380685 Chu Apr 1983 A
4409132 Forbus et al. Oct 1983 A
4415477 Rozovsky et al. Nov 1983 A
4417076 Rozovsky et al. Nov 1983 A
4444989 Herkes Apr 1984 A
RE31919 Butter et al. Jun 1985 E
4536375 Holt et al. Aug 1985 A
4548914 Chu Oct 1985 A
4554394 Forbus et al. Nov 1985 A
4590321 Chu May 1986 A
4623530 Cullo et al. Nov 1986 A
4623633 Young Nov 1986 A
4638106 Pieters et al. Jan 1987 A
4657884 Luft et al. Apr 1987 A
4665251 Chu May 1987 A
4670616 De Simone et al. Jun 1987 A
4673767 Nimry et al. Jun 1987 A
4681745 Pinto Jul 1987 A
4694114 Chu et al. Sep 1987 A
4695442 Pinto et al. Sep 1987 A
4695666 Chao et al. Sep 1987 A
4695667 Sumitani et al. Sep 1987 A
4704495 Dessau Nov 1987 A
4716135 Chen Dec 1987 A
4721827 Cullo et al. Jan 1988 A
4727209 Chao Feb 1988 A
4746763 Kocal May 1988 A
4758328 Young Jul 1988 A
4761513 Steacy Aug 1988 A
4781815 Pellet et al. Nov 1988 A
4847223 Le Van Mao et al. Jul 1989 A
4861930 Cottrell et al. Aug 1989 A
4873067 Valyocsik et al. Oct 1989 A
4891197 Derouane et al. Jan 1990 A
4891467 Sikkenga Jan 1990 A
4902406 Valyocsik Feb 1990 A
4910007 Pinto et al. Mar 1990 A
4912073 Chu Mar 1990 A
4914067 Pellet et al. Apr 1990 A
4935574 D'Amore et al. Jun 1990 A
4962255 Fraenkel et al. Oct 1990 A
4973399 Green et al. Nov 1990 A
4973781 Valyocsik et al. Nov 1990 A
4980052 Green et al. Dec 1990 A
5041402 Casci et al. Aug 1991 A
5043502 Martindale et al. Aug 1991 A
5047141 Chu Sep 1991 A
5068483 Barthomeuf et al. Nov 1991 A
5094995 Butt et al. Mar 1992 A
5105047 Waller Apr 1992 A
5108579 Casci Apr 1992 A
5110776 Chitnis et al. May 1992 A
5118482 Narayana et al. Jun 1992 A
5124299 Waller Jun 1992 A
5171921 Gaffney et al. Dec 1992 A
5173461 Absil et al. Dec 1992 A
5178748 Casci et al. Jan 1993 A
5210356 Shamshoum et al. May 1993 A
5227558 Shamshoum et al. Jul 1993 A
5231064 Absil et al. Jul 1993 A
5233102 Butt et al. Aug 1993 A
5246688 Faust et al. Sep 1993 A
5248841 Young Sep 1993 A
5254767 Dwyer Oct 1993 A
5254770 Olson et al. Oct 1993 A
5294332 Klotz Mar 1994 A
5294578 Ho et al. Mar 1994 A
5315033 Butt et al. May 1994 A
5318696 Kowalski Jun 1994 A
5321183 Chang et al. Jun 1994 A
5330732 Ishibashi et al. Jul 1994 A
5336478 Dwyer et al. Aug 1994 A
5336824 Shamshoum et al. Aug 1994 A
5345021 Casci et al. Sep 1994 A
5348643 Absil et al. Sep 1994 A
5349113 Chang et al. Sep 1994 A
5365003 Chang et al. Nov 1994 A
5366948 Absil et al. Nov 1994 A
5367100 Gongwei et al. Nov 1994 A
5371307 Guth et al. Dec 1994 A
5378670 Kumar Jan 1995 A
5380690 Zhicheng et al. Jan 1995 A
5385718 Casci et al. Jan 1995 A
5387732 Shamshoum et al. Feb 1995 A
5399336 Guth et al. Mar 1995 A
5430212 Butt et al. Jul 1995 A
5430213 Hendriksen et al. Jul 1995 A
5446234 Casci et al. Aug 1995 A
5455213 Chang et al. Oct 1995 A
5456821 Absil et al. Oct 1995 A
5464799 Casci et al. Nov 1995 A
5475179 Chang et al. Dec 1995 A
5498814 Chang et al. Mar 1996 A
5503818 Nicolaides Apr 1996 A
5512260 Kiliany et al. Apr 1996 A
5516736 Chang et al. May 1996 A
5523510 Pellet et al. Jun 1996 A
5529964 Weitkamp et al. Jun 1996 A
5534239 Fajula et al. Jul 1996 A
5536894 Degnan et al. Jul 1996 A
5541146 Chang et al. Jul 1996 A
5561095 Chen et al. Oct 1996 A
5563310 Chang et al. Oct 1996 A
5569805 Beck et al. Oct 1996 A
5571768 Chang et al. Nov 1996 A
5573746 Chen Nov 1996 A
5576256 Monque et al. Nov 1996 A
5602066 Beck et al. Feb 1997 A
5607888 Chang et al. Mar 1997 A
5607890 Chen et al. Mar 1997 A
5646314 Crocco et al. Jul 1997 A
5648580 Chen et al. Jul 1997 A
5658454 Absil et al. Aug 1997 A
5675047 Beck et al. Oct 1997 A
5689024 Schmitt Nov 1997 A
5698756 Beck et al. Dec 1997 A
5726114 Chang et al. Mar 1998 A
5780563 Chen et al. Jul 1998 A
5789335 Chen et al. Aug 1998 A
5811613 Bhat et al. Sep 1998 A
5833840 Absil et al. Nov 1998 A
5847255 Ghosh et al. Dec 1998 A
5856603 Rekker et al. Jan 1999 A
5902919 Chen et al. May 1999 A
5905051 Wu et al. May 1999 A
5907073 Ghosh May 1999 A
5922922 Harris et al. Jul 1999 A
5925586 Sun Jul 1999 A
5939597 Dessau et al. Aug 1999 A
5951963 He et al. Sep 1999 A
5952535 King et al. Sep 1999 A
5955641 Chen et al. Sep 1999 A
5968463 Shelef et al. Oct 1999 A
5990031 Ghosh Nov 1999 A
5994603 Mohr et al. Nov 1999 A
6034283 Ban et al. Mar 2000 A
6040257 Drake et al. Mar 2000 A
6046128 Kisen et al. Apr 2000 A
6047544 Yamamoto et al. Apr 2000 A
6048816 Brown et al. Apr 2000 A
6057485 Merrill et al. May 2000 A
6060633 Chen et al. May 2000 A
6074975 Yao et al. Jun 2000 A
6080303 Cao et al. Jun 2000 A
6080698 Zhang et al. Jun 2000 A
6083865 Drake et al. Jul 2000 A
6090274 Wu et al. Jul 2000 A
6090991 Butler et al. Jul 2000 A
6096938 Ghosh Aug 2000 A
6100437 Koehl et al. Aug 2000 A
6124227 Yao et al. Sep 2000 A
6150293 Verduijn et al. Nov 2000 A
6156949 Brown et al. Dec 2000 A
6160191 Smith et al. Dec 2000 A
6187982 Beck et al. Feb 2001 B1
6211104 Shi et al. Apr 2001 B1
6217748 Hatanaka et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222084 Ghosh et al. Apr 2001 B1
6251263 Hatanaka et al. Jun 2001 B1
6268305 Butler et al. Jul 2001 B1
6294493 Strohmaier et al. Sep 2001 B1
6300535 van den Berge et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306790 Rodriguez et al. Oct 2001 B1
6319484 Shore et al. Nov 2001 B1
6342153 Guan et al. Jan 2002 B1
6346190 Khare Feb 2002 B1
6388156 Ou et al. May 2002 B1
6395664 Boehner et al. May 2002 B1
6399530 Chen et al. Jun 2002 B1
6417421 Yao Jul 2002 B1
6423879 Brown et al. Jul 2002 B1
6444610 Yamamoto Sep 2002 B1
6459006 Ou et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469095 Gareiss et al. Oct 2002 B1
6503862 Yamamoto Jan 2003 B1
6504072 Brown et al. Jan 2003 B1
6504074 Berduijn et al. Jan 2003 B2
6506954 Brown et al. Jan 2003 B1
6518213 Yamamoto et al. Feb 2003 B1
6548725 Froment et al. Apr 2003 B2
6566293 Vogt et al. May 2003 B1
6576582 Beck et al. Jun 2003 B1
6589901 Yamamoto Jul 2003 B2
6613708 Ou et al. Sep 2003 B1
6613951 Brown et al. Sep 2003 B1
6642426 Johnson et al. Nov 2003 B1
6689929 Williams et al. Feb 2004 B2
6699811 Mohr et al. Mar 2004 B1
6723297 Chen et al. Apr 2004 B2
6726834 Quesada et al. Apr 2004 B2
6770251 Yoshikawa Aug 2004 B2
6773694 Lesch et al. Aug 2004 B1
6799089 Toulhoat Sep 2004 B2
6811684 Mohr et al. Nov 2004 B2
6812181 van der Berge et al. Nov 2004 B2
6864399 Merrill et al. Mar 2005 B2
6943131 Ghosh et al. Sep 2005 B1
7060644 Ghosh et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060864 Ghosh et al. Jun 2006 B2
7084318 Ghosh et al. Aug 2006 B2
7105713 Ghosh et al. Sep 2006 B2
7119239 Johnson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7176339 Iaccino et al. Feb 2007 B2
7186873 Feng et al. Mar 2007 B2
7196237 Ghosh et al. Mar 2007 B2
7232516 Sughure, II et al. Jun 2007 B2
7279608 Ghosh et al. Oct 2007 B2
7285511 Ghosh et al. Oct 2007 B2
7304194 Ghosh et al. Dec 2007 B2
7363410 Bian et al. Apr 2008 B2
7368410 Ghosh et al. May 2008 B2
7396967 Iaccino et al. Jul 2008 B2
7399727 Ghosh et al. Jul 2008 B2
7446069 Ghosh et al. Nov 2008 B2
7507685 Ghosh et al. Mar 2009 B2
7560608 Ghosh et al. Jul 2009 B2
7576026 Ghosh et al. Aug 2009 B2
7635793 Ghosh et al. Dec 2009 B2
7662737 Ghosh et al. Feb 2010 B2
7674942 Ghosh et al. Mar 2010 B2
7713898 Ghosh et al. May 2010 B2
8008223 Garcia-Martinez Aug 2011 B2
8062987 Ghosh et al. Nov 2011 B2
20030004383 Brown et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030055305 Beck et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030121827 van den Berge et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030127360 van den Berge et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040004023 Sughrue, II et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040087822 Buchanan et al. May 2004 A1
20040158111 Johnson et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040262200 Sughure, II et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050020435 Beck et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050070749 Ghosh et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050075524 Feng et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050143613 Dakka et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050194289 Overbeek et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050202956 Sterte et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050239635 Ghosh et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240070 Ghosh et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060151358 Brown et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060252633 Ghosh et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070015658 Turaga et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070032374 Lau et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070149384 Ghosh et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070225156 Sughrue, II et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080058564 Iaccino et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080306317 Ghosh et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090253949 Ghosh et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100113850 Ghosh et al. May 2010 A1
20100168484 Kyotani et al. Jul 2010 A1
20110137099 Ghosh et al. Jun 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
2025402 Feb 2009 EP
61221137 Oct 1971 JP
WO2009016156 Feb 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (17)
Entry
F.M. Bautista, et al., Toluene Methylation ON AlPO4-Al2O3 Catalysts, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 1996, pp. 61-70, vol. 57, No. 1.
Oyvind Mikkelsen, et al., Use of Isotopic Labeling for Mechanistic Studies of the Methanol-to-Hydrocarbons reaction. Methylation of toluene with Methanol Over H-ZSM-5, H-Mordenite and H-Beta, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2000, pp. 93-113, vol. 40.
P.G. Smirniotis, et al., Alkylation of Benzene or Toluene with MeOH or C2H4 over ZSM-5 or B-Zeolite: Effect of the Zeolite Pore Openings and of the Hydrocarbons Involved on the Mechanism of Alkylation, Ind Eng. Chem. Res., 1995, pp. 1517-1528, vol. 34.
F.M. Bautista, et al., Continuous Flow Toluene Methylation Over AlPO4 and AlPO4-Al2O3 Catalysts, Catalysis Letters, 1994, pp. 159-167, vol. 26.
Y.Oumi et al., Effect of Framework Structure on the Dealumination-Realumination Behavior of Zeolite, Materials Chemistry and Physics, 78, 2002, pp. 551-557.
T. Sano et al., Realumination of Dealuminated HZSM-5 Zeolites by Acid Treatment and Their Catalytic Properties, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 31, 1999, pp. 89-95.
B. Sulikowskie et al., Acidity and Catalytic Properties of Realuminated Zeolite Y, J. Phys. Chem. B., 101, 1997, pp. 6929-6932.
P.J. Barrie et al., Neutron Diffraction Studies of Realuminated Zeolite Y, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 1991, pp. 592-594.
H. Hamdan et al., Hydrothermal Isomorphous Substitution of Aluminum in Faujastic Frameworks: Second Generation Zeolite, J. Phys. Chem. 93, 1989, pp. 350-356.
A. Omegna et al., Dealumination and Realumination of Microcrystalline Zeolite Beta; An XRD, FTIR and Quantitative Multienuclear (MQ) MAS NMR Study, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 6, 2004, pp. 447-452.
Y. Oumi et al., Realumination of Zeolite Y Under Acidic Conditions, J. Porous Matter, 14, 2007. pp. 19-26.
N.V. Beznis et al., Oxidation of Methane to Methanol and Formaldehyde Over Co-ZSM-5 Molecular Sieves: Tuning the Reactivity and Selectivity by Alkaline and Acid Treatments of the Zeolite ZSM-5 Agglomerates, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 138, 2011, pp. 176-183.
Dan Liu et al., Steaming and Washing Effect of P/HZSM-5 in Catalytic Cracking of Naphtha, Catalysis Today, Oct. 26, 2010, pp. 154-157, vol. 164, No. 1, Elsevier, NL.
G. Lischke, Spectroscopic and Physicochemical Characterizatio of P-Modified H-ZSM-5, Journal of Catalysis, Nov. 1, 1991, pp. 229-243, vol. 132, No. 1.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2012/071922, May 22, 2013, pp. 1-5, International Searching Authority.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International App. No. PCT/US2012/071922, May 22, 2013, pp. 1-9, International Searching Authority.
Flanigen et al., Silicalite, A New Hydrophobic Crystalline Silica Molecular Sieve, Nature vol. 271 (Feb. 9, 1978) pp. 512-516.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140005033 A1 Jan 2014 US