The invention relates to a novel method for modifying the genome of Gram-positive bacteria, to these bacteria and to novel vectors. The invention particularly relates to a method for modifying corynebacteria or brevibacteria with the aid of a novel marker gene which has a conditionally negatively dominant action in the bacteria.
Corynebacterium glutamicum is a Gram-positive, aerobic bacterium which (like other corynebacteria, i.e. Corynebacterium and Brevibacterium species too) is used industrially for producing a number of fine chemicals, and also for breaking down hydrocarbons and oxidizing terpenoids (for a review, see, for example, Liebl (1992) “The Genus Corynebacterium”, in: The Procaryotes, Volume II, Balows, A. et al., eds. Springer).
Because of the availability of cloning vectors for use in corynebacteria and techniques for genetic manipulation of C. glutamicum and related Corynebacterium and Brevibacterium species (see, for example, Yoshihama et al., J. Bacteriol. 162 (1985) 591-597; Katsumata et al., J. Bacteriol. 159 (1984) 306-311; and Santamaria et al. J. Gen. Microbiol. 130 (1984) 2237-2246), genetic modification of these organisms is possible (for example by overexpression of genes) in order, for example, to make them better and more efficient as producers of one or more fine chemicals.
The use of plasmids able to replicate in corynebacteria is in this connection a well-established technique which is known to the skilled worker, is widely used and has been documented many times in the literature (see, for example, Deb, J. K et al. (1999) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 175, 11-20).
It is likewise possible for genetic modification of corynebacteria to take place by modification of the DNA sequence of the genome. It is possible to introduce DNA sequences into the genome (newly introduced and/or introduction of further copies of sequences which are present), it is also possible to delete DNA sequence sections from the genome (e.g. genes or parts of genes), but it is also possible to carry out sequence exchanges (e.g. base exchanges) in the genome.
The modification of the genome can be achieved by introducing into the cell DNA which is preferably not replicated in the cell, and by recombining this introduced DNA with genomic host DNA and thus modifying the genomic DNA. This procedure is described, for example, in van der Rest, M. E. et al. (1999) Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 52, 541-545 and references therein.
It is advantageous to be able to delete the transformation marker used (such as, for example, an antibiotic resistance gene) again because this marker can then be reused in further transformation experiments. One possibility for carrying this out is to use a marker gene which has a conditionally negatively dominant action.
A marker gene which has a conditionally negatively dominant action means, a gene which is disadvantageous (e.g. toxic) for the host under certain conditions but has no adverse effects on the host harboring the gene under other conditions. An example from the literature is the URA3 gene from yeasts or fungi, an essential gene of pyrimidine biosynthesis which, however, is disadvantageous for the host if the chemical 5-fluoroorotic acid is present in the medium (see, for example, DE19801120, Rothstein, R. (1991) Methods in Enzymology 194, 281-301).
The use of a marker gene which has a conditionally negatively dominant action for deleting DNA sequences (for example the transformation marker used and/or vector sequences and other sequence sections), also called “pop-out”, is described, for example, in Schäfer et al. (1994) Gene 145, 69-73 or in Rothstein, R. (1991) Methods in Enzymology 194, 281-301.
The sacB gene from Bacillus subtilis codes for the enzyme levan sucrase (EC 2.4.1.10) and has been described in Steinmetz, M. et al. (1983) Mol. Gen. Genet. 191, 138-144, and Steinmetz, M. et al. (1985) Mol. Gen. Genet. 200, 220-228. It is known (Gay, P. et al. (1985) J. Bacteriology 164, 918-921, Schäfer et al. (1994) Gene 145, 69-73, EP0812918, EP0563527, EP0117823), that the sacB gene from Bacillus subtilis is suitable as a marker gene which has a conditionally negatively dominant action. This selection method is based on the fact that cells which harbor the sacB gene cannot grow in the presence of 5% sucrose. Growth of cells occurs only after loss or inactivation of the levan sucrase. The sensitivity to 10% sucrose of certain Gram-positive bacteria able to express the sacB gene from Bacillus subtilis was then described by Jäger, W. et al. (1992) J. Bacteriology 174, 5462-5465. It has additionally been shown that it is possible with the sacB gene from B. subtilis to carry out in Corynebacterium glutamicum a selection for gene disruptions or an allelic exchange by homologous recombination (Schäfer et al. (1994) Gene 145, 69-73).
It has now been found that the sacB gene from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (Tang et al. (1990) Gene 96, 89-93) is surprisingly particularly suitable for use as a marker gene which has a conditionally negatively dominant action in corynebacteria. Selectability using sacB depends on the efficiency of expression of the gene in the heterologous host organism. The high efficiency of expression of the sacB gene from B. amyloliquefaciens makes this gene a preferably used gene.
The invention discloses a novel and simple method for modifying genomic sequences in corynebacteria using the sacB gene from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as novel marker gene which has a conditionally negatively dominant action. This may comprise genomic integrations of nucleic acid molecules (for example complete genes), disruptions (for example deletions or integrative disruptions) and sequence modifications (for example single or multiple point mutations, complete gene exchanges). Preferred disruptions are those leading to a reduction in byproducts of the desired fermentation product, and preferred integrations are those strengthening a desired metabolism into a fermentation product and/or diminishing or eliminating bottlenecks (de-bottlenecking). In the case of sequence modifications, appropriate metabolic adaptations are preferred. The fermentation product is preferably a fine chemical.
The invention relates in particular to a plasmid vector which does not replicate in the target organism, having the following components:
Target organism means in this connection the organism whose genomic sequence is to be modified.
The invention additionally relates to a method for marker-free mutagenesis in Gram-positive bacterial strains comprising the following steps:
The promoter is preferably heterologous to B. amyloliquefaciens and is, in particular, from E. coli or C. glutamicum and additionally in particular the tac promoter.
Sequences exchanged in the target organism are, in particular, those which increase the yields in the production of fine chemicals. Examples of such genes are indicated in WO 01/0842, 843 & 844, WO 01/0804 & 805, WO 01/2583.
The transfer of DNA into the target organism is made possible in particular by conjugation or electroporation. DNA which is to be transferred by conjugation into the target organism comprises special sequence sections which make this possible. Such so-called mob sequences and their use are described, for example, in Schäfer, A. et al. (1991) J. Bacteriol. 172, 1663-1666.
Genetic marker means a selectable property. Preference is given to antibiotic resistances, in particular a resistance to kanamycin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline or ampicillin.
Sucrose-containing medium means, in particular, a medium with not less than 5% and not more than 10% (by weight) sucrose.
Target organism means the organism which is to be genetically modified by the method of the invention. Preferred meanings are Gram-positive bacteria, in particular bacterial strains from the genus Brevibacterium or Corynebacterium. Corynebacteria means for the purposes of the invention Corynebacterium species, Brevibacterium species and Mycobacterium species. Preference is given to Corynebacterium species and Brevibacterium species. Examples of Corynebacterium species and Brevibacterium species are: Brevibacterium brevis, Brevibacterium lactofermentum, Corynebacterium ammoniagenes, Corynebacterium glutamicum, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Corynebacterium lactofermentum. Examples of Mycobacterium species are: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium leprae, Mycobacterium bovis, Mycobacterium smegmatis.
Particular preference is given to the strains indicated in the table below:
Corynebacterium and Brevibacterium strains:
Brevibacterium
ammoniagenes
Brevibacterium
ammoniagenes
Brevibacterium
ammoniagenes
Brevibacterium
ammoniagenes
Brevibacterium
ammoniagenes
Brevibacterium
ammoniagenes
Brevibacterium
ammoniagenes
Brevibacterium
ammoniagenes
Brevibacterium
ammoniagenes
Brevibacterium
ammoniagenes
Brevibacterium
ammoniagenes
Brevibacterium
ammoniagenes
Brevibacterium
ammoniagenes
Brevibacterium
butanicum
Brevibacterium
divaricatum
Brevibacterium
flavum
Brevibacterium
flavum
Brevibacterium
flavum
Brevibacterium
flavum
Brevibacterium
flavum
Brevibacterium
flavum
Brevibacterium
flavum
Brevibacterium
flavum
Brevibacterium
flavum
Brevibacterium
flavum
Brevibacterium
flavum
Brevibacterium
flavum
Brevibacterium
flavum
Brevibacterium
flavum
Brevibacterium
flavum
Brevibacterium
flavum
Brevibacterium
healii
Brevibacterium
ketoglutamicum
Brevibacterium
ketoglutamicum
Brevibacterium
ketosoreductum
Brevibacterium
lactofermentum
Brevibacterium
lactofermentum
Brevibacterium
lactofermentum
Brevibacterium
lactofermentum
Brevibacterium
lactofermentum
Brevibacterium
lactofermentum
Brevibacterium
lactofermentum
Brevibacterium
lactofermentum
Brevibacterium
lactofermentum
Brevibacterium
lactofermentum
Brevibacterium
lactofermentum
Brevibacterium
lactofermentum
Brevibacterium
lactofermentum
Brevibacterium
linens
Brevibacterium
linens
Brevibacterium
linens
Brevibacterium
paraffinolyticum
Brevibacterium
Brevibacterium
Brevibacterium
Brevibacterium
Brevibacterium
Brevibacterium
Brevibacterium
Brevibacterium
Corynebacterium
acetoacidophilum
Corynebacterium
acetoacidophilum
Corynebacterium
acetoglutamicum
Corynebacterium
acetoglutamicum
Corynebacterium
acetoglutamicum
Corynebacterium
acetoglutamicum
Corynebacterium
acetoglutamicum
Corynebacterium
acetophilum
Corynebacterium
ammoniagenes
Corynebacterium
ammoniagenes
Corynebacterium
fujiokense
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
glutamicum
Corynebacterium
lilium
Corynebacterium
nitrilophilus
Corynebacterium
Corynebacterium
Corynebacterium
Corynebacterium
Corynebacterium
Corynebacterium
Corynebacterium
Corynebacterium
Corynebacterium
Corynebacterium
Corynebacterium
The mutants generated in this way can then be used to produce fine chemicals or, in the case of C. diphtheriae, to produce, for example, vaccines with attenuated or nonpathogenic organisms. Fine chemicals mean: organic acids, both proteinogenic and nonproteinogenic amino acids, nucleotides and nucleosides, lipids and fatty acids, diols, carbohydrates, aromatic compounds, vitamins and cofactors, and enzymes.
The term “fine chemical” is known in the art and comprises molecules which are produced by an organism and are used in various branches of industry such as, for example, but not restricted to, the pharmaceutical industry, the agricultural industry and the cosmetics industry. These compounds comprise organic acids such as tartaric acid, itaconic acid and diaminopimelic acid, both proteinogenic and nonproteinogenic amino acids, purine and pyrimidine bases, nucleosides and nucleotides (as described, for example, in Kuninaka, A. (1996) Nucleotides and related compounds, pp. 561-612, in Biotechnology Vol. 6, Rehm et al., editors VCH: Weinheim and the references therein), lipids, saturated and unsaturated fatty acids (for example arachidonic acid), diols (for example propanediol and butanediol), carbohydrates (for example hyaluronic acid and trehalose), aromatic compounds (for example aromatic amines, vanillin and indigo), vitamins and cofactors (as described in Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Vol. A27, “Vitamins”, pp. 443-613 (1996) VCH: Weinheim and the references therein; and Ong, A. S., Niki, E. and Packer, L. (1995) “Nutrition, Lipids, Health and Disease” Proceedings of the UNESCO/Confederation of Scientific and Technological Associations in Malaysia and the Society for Free Radical Research—Asia, held Sep. 1-3, 1994, in Penang, Malaysia, AOCS Press (1995)), Enzymes, Polyketides (Cane et al. (1998) Science 282: 63-68), and all other chemicals described by Gutcho (1983) in Chemicals by Fermentation, Noyes Data Corporation, ISBN: 0818805086 and the references indicated therein. The metabolism and the uses of certain fine chemicals are explained further below.
This procedure can also be carried out with other bacteria in an analogous manner.
A culture of B. amyloliquefaciens ATCC 23844 was grown in Erlenmeyer flasks with LB medium at 37° C. overnight. The bacteria were then pelleted by centrifugation. 1 g of moist cell pellet was resuspended in 2 ml of water, and 260 μl of this were transferred into blue Hybrid matrix tubes, #RYM-61111 (Genome Star Kit, #GC-150). These tubes already contained: 650 μl of phenol (equilibrated with TE buffer, pH 7.5); 650 μl of buffer 1 from the above kit; 130 μl of chloroform. The cells were disrupted in a Ribolyser (Hybaid, #6000220/110) at rotation setting 4.0 for 15 sec and then centrifuged at 4° C. and 10,000 rpm for 5 min. 650 μL of the supernatant were then transferred into 2.0 ml Eppendorf vessels and mixed with 2 μL of RNAse (10 mg/ml). Incubation was then carried out at 37° C. for 60 min. 1/10 volume of 3M Na acetate pH 5.5 and 2 volumes of 100% ethanol were then added to this solution, and it was cautiously mixed. The DNA was then precipitated by centrifugation at 4° C. and 13,000 rpm for 10 minutes. The pellet was washed with 70% ethanol and dried in air. After drying, the DNA pellet was taken up in water and measured by photometry.
The primer oligonucleotides which can be used for cloning the gene for levan sucrase from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (ATCC23844) by PCR are those which can be defined on the basis of published sequences for levan sucrase (for example Genbank entry X52988). The PCR can be carried out by methods well known to the skilled worker and described, for example, in Sambrook, J. et al. (1989) “Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual”, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press or Ausubel, F. M. et al. (1994) “Current Protocols in Molecular Biology”, John Wiley & Sons. The gene for levan sucrase (sacB gene), consisting of the protein-coding sequence and 17 by 5′ (ribosome binding site) of the coding sequence can be provided during the PCR with terminal cleavage sites for restriction endonucleases (for example BamHI) and then the PCR product can be cloned into suitable vectors (such as the E. coli plasmid pUC18) which have suitable cleavage sites for restriction endonucleases. This method of cloning genes by PCR is known to the skilled worker and described, for example, in Sambrook, J. et al. (1989) “Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual”, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press or Ausubel, F. M. et al. (1994) “Current Protocols in Molecular Biology”, John Wiley & Sons. It can be demonstrated by sequence analysis (as described in Example 3) that the sacB gene from B. amyloliquefaciens has been cloned with the known sequence. The following primers were employed for the PCR reaction:
The sacB gene from B. amyloliquefaciens was initially put under the control of a heterologous promoter. For this purpose, the tac promoter from E. coli was cloned by PCR methods as described in Example 2. The following primers were used for this:
The tac promoter and the sacB gene were then fused via the common NotI restriction endonuclease cleavage site and cloned by means of the AspI and SpeI cleavage sites in a shuttle vector which is replicable both in E. coli and in C. glutamicum and confers kanamycin resistance. After DNA transfer to C. glutamicum (see, for example, WO 01/02583) and selection of kanamycin-resistant colonies, about 20 of these colonies were streaked in parallel on agar plates containing either 10% sucrose or no sucrose. CM plates (10 g/l glucose, 2.5 g/l NaCl, 2 g/l urea, 10 g/l polypeptone, 5 g/l yeast extract, 5 g/1 meat extract, 22 g/l agar, pH 6.8 with 2 M NaOH, per plate: 4 μL of IPTG 26% strength) were suitable for this selection and were incubated at 30° C. Clones with expressed sacB gene were grown on overnight only on sucrose-free plates.
Any suitable sequence section at the 5′ end of the ddh gene of C. glutamicum (Ishino et al. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 3917) and any suitable sequence section at the 3′ end of the ddh gene can be amplified by known PCR methods. The two PCR products can be fused by known methods so that the resulting product has no functional ddh gene. This inactive form of the ddh gene, and the sacB gene from B. amyloliquefaciens, can be cloned into pSL18 (Kim, Y. H. & H.-S. Lee (1996) J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 6, 315-320) to result in the vector pSL18sacBaΔddh. The procedure is familiar to the skilled worker. Transfer of this vector into Corynebacterium is known to the skilled worker and is possible, for example, by conjugation or electroporation.
Selection of the integrants can take place with kanamycin, and selection for the “pop-out” can take place as described in Example 2. Inactivation of the ddh gene can be shown, for example, by the lack of Ddh activity. Ddh activity can be measured by known methods (see, for example, Misono et al. (1986) Agric. Biol. Chem. 50, 1329-1330).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
101 09 996.7 | Mar 2001 | DE | national |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10467479 | Aug 2003 | US |
Child | 11476404 | US |