1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a method of computing moments in RLC interconnects of high-speed VLSI circuits and, more particularly, to a method of moment computations of lumped interconnect circuits with resistor loops.
2. Description of Related Art
With the advance of modem VLSI techniques, delay and signal/power integrity issues on interconnects have played a significant role on performances of an IC design. To address these issues effectively, interconnects are often modeled as lumped or distributed R(L)C circuits. Owing to the increasing wire density and the required modeling accuracy, the wire model for practical chip designs may be with a huge scale. Thus, using traditional circuit simulators, such as SPICE, to simulate such circuits become inefficient and impractical.
In order to solve this task, moment matching methods have been widely applied in the past for timing analysis, crosstalk estimations, power/ground network analysis, and generating reduced-order models of VLSI interconnect models. For example, see U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,047,117; 6,308,304; 6,314,546; 6,347,393; 6,601,223; and 6,662,149. Since interconnects are often modeled as R(L)C trees, the moments at nodes on the frees can be calculated recursively in an efficient manner (L. T. Pillage and R. A. Rohrer, “Asymptotic waveform evaluation for timing analysis,” IEEE Trans. on CAD, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 352-366, 1990; C. L. Ratzlaff and L. T. Pillage, “RICE: Rapid interconnect circuit evaluation using AWE,” IEEE Trans. on CAD, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 763-776, 1994; Q. Yu, and E. S. Kuh, “Exact moment matching models of transmission lines and application to interconnect delay estimation,” IEEE Trans. on VLSI Systems, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 311-322, 1995; Q. Yu, and E. S. Kuh, “Moment computation of lumped and distributed coupled RC frees with application to delay and crosstalk Estimation,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 89, No. 5, pp. 772-788, 2001; and Q. Yu, E. S. Kuh and T. Xue, “Moment models of general transmission lines with application to interconnect analysis and optimization,” IEEE Trans. on VLSI Systems, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 477-494, 1996. However, if interconnect structures contain resistor loops (links), which have been widely considered in power/ground or clock networks, or dielectric losses, these moment computation formulas need to be modified due to do currents flowing through these links.
In recent work, Chan et al. proposed a technique to compute the Elmore delay called the first-order moment) in general RC networks •P. K. Chan and K. Karplus, “Computing signal delay in general RC networks by tree/link partition,” IEEE Trans. on CAD, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 898-902, 1990•. Ratzlaff et al. extended the branch tearing for computing moments of the interconnect circuits with resistor loops •C. L. Ratzlaff and L. T. Pillage, “RICE: Rapid interconnect circuit evaluation using AWE,” IEEE Trans. on CAD, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 763-776, 1994•. The basic idea of the above two approaches is using the concept of Kron's method. The interconnect network can be partitioned into a spanning tree and several key links. As a result, delays at nodes of a given tree can be obtained by sequentially appending these links back to reconstruct the original network •R. A. Rohrer, “Circuit partitioning simplified,” IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 2-5, 1988•. The key techniques of tree/link partitions are the substitution theorem and the superposition theorem. If the circuit network contains only one resistor link, the computational cost is low. Nevertheless, for multiple resistor links, the problem becomes more complicated since the currents flowing through unopened resistor links are required to be known in advance. Ratzlaff et al. demonstrated that the computational costs are rather high with a large number of links.
In this invention, an efficient moment computation technique based on tree/link partitioning is provided for R(L)C interconnect networks with single and multiple resistor links and, in particular, on lumped R(L)C interconnect models. To address the issues with a single resistor link, the conventional recursive moment computation formulae for R(L)C frees and the concept of tree/link partitioning are combined. Thus the corresponding computational complexity can also retain linear. To simplify the computational complexity associated with multiple links, a reduced ordered binary-decision diagram (ROBDD) is constructed to store the state variables of the zeroth-order moments. Moments at nodes on R(L)C trees can be updated recursively. The computational cost is proportional to O(t2n), where t denotes the number of links and n represents the number of nodes. Since the number of resistor links for a general R(L)C interconnect network is much less than that of nodes, t<<n, the cost of moment computations can be reduced to O(n). Finally, two practical interconnect examples using current technology information, including an R(L)C tree network with multiple resistor links, and an RC mesh network, will be demonstrated to illustrate the accuracy of the method of the present invention.
Further benefits and advantages of the present invention will become apparent after a careful reading of the detailed description with appropriate reference to the accompanying drawings.
The flow chart of the invention is shown is
The notation of this invention is described as follows: t denotes the number of the resistor links in the circuit, and L generally represents the resistance link. For each Thevenin equivalent circuit T(i,j), the first variable i represents the resistor links numbering 1 to i in the original circuit and is located in the i-th layer of the ROBDD tree, i.e. i<=t. The second variable j denotes the resistance link numbering j in the original circuit. As shown in
Special R(L)C Trees
If a R(L)C interconnect network has a special free structure, the computational cost can be further reduced. An R(L)C tree includes floating resistors (and inductors) from the ground and capacitors that connect nodes on the tree and to the ground. A lumped R(L)C-tree model excludes transmission lines, couplings, and resistor loops.
Let N={n0,n1,n2, . . . ,nn} be the set of nodes in the tree network. Suppose that a voltage source with an impulse function δ(t) is connected between node n0 and ground. For each node nj∈{N−n0}, the grounding capacitor connected at node nj is denoted as Cj.Let Vj(s) and Ij(s) be the transfer functions of the voltage at node nj and the current entering into node nj, respectively. Expanding Vj(s) and Ij(s) in power series produces
where Vj,k and Ij,k are called the kth-order moment of the voltage vj(s) and the current Ij(s). At node n0, the voltage moments are V0,0=1 and V0,k=0 for k>0. For each grounding capacitor Cj, the capacitive current IC
By using the Kirchhoff's current law and the Kirchhoff's voltage law, voltage moments for each node nj∈{N−n0} in this lumped R(L)C tree can be calculated by the conventional recursive formulae as follows:
The corresponding computational complexity can be shown to be proportional to O(kn), where n is the number of nodes in the circuit and k is the given maximum order.
The aim of this invention is to reduce the cost of moment computations of R(L)C interconnect networks containing a few resistor loops (or links) by tree/link partitioning techniques. By investigating special interconnect tree structures, it can be shown that the computational cost about moments still preserves within the order O(kn).
Tree/Link Partitioning for Moment Computations with A Single Resistor Link
Suppose that a circuit graph G=(N,B) consists of a set of nodes N={n0,n1,n2, . . . ,nn} and a set of branches B={b1,B2, . . . ,bm}. Then, the circuit G can be partitioned into a spanning tree, containing n+1 nodes and n branches, and the complement of the tree (the so-called cotree) comprising t=m−n links BL={bL,1,bL,2, . . . ,bL,i}. For each node nj∈N, the kth-order moment Vj,k can be obtained by combining the contributions from the open circuit and the Thevenin circuit by the superposition theorem.
Suppose that a resistor link Rlink is connected between nodes np and nq in a RC-tree circuit, as shown in
Vj=Vj(o)+IR·Vj(T), (3)
where
Vd(o)=Vp,k(o)−Vq,k(o) represents the voltage moment difference between nodes np and nq. R(T)=VpT−VqT is the Thevenin equivalent resistor seen from Rlink.
Suppose that an R(L)C interconnect network is partitioned into a R(L)C tree and a link resistor Rlink. Each kth-order inductance voltage moment ELj,k for nj∈N will be set to be zero in the corresponding Thevenin equivalent circuit. Therefore, the Thevenin equivalent circuit of the RLC interconnect network is the same as that of the RC interconnect network mentioned in this section.
Tree/Link Partitioning for Moment Computations with Multiple Resistor Links
While the interconnect R(L)C network contains multiple resistor links, the moment computation method can still be used with some extensions. However, the problem becomes more complicated. For example, consider a circuit with three links {bL,1 bL,2 bL,3}. If each resistor link is opened and replaced with a 1A current source incrementally, tracing the above steps will form an ordered binary-decision diagram (OBDD), as shown in
In order to reduce the computational cost, an assistant reduced ordered binary-decision diagram (ROBDD) is constructed for storing the intermediate zeroth-order moments of the R(L)C circuits with unopened links. Thus, the moments at nodes on R(L)C trees will be updated by these saved data. The data structure of the ROBDD is compact as shown in
The ROBDD in
1. After replacing a link with a 1A current source, opening all voltage sources, and shorting all other current sources, the Thevenin equivalent circuits in the same level of the OBDD tree are the same. Hence, circuits OT and TT are the same, and circuits OOT, OTT, TOT, and TTT are the same. It can be concluded that the Thevenin equivalent circuits XX . . . XT in the same level are the same, where X may be O or T.
2. Circuits OTO and TOO are similar except for different driver positions. Links bL,2 and bL,1 are replaced with two 1A current sources in circuits OTO and TOO, respectively. Instead, the same open circuit voltage Vd(O) by opening link bL,3 is observed in the two circuits.
3. Except for circuits O, OO, and OOO, all other circuits are independent on order k. Therefore, a further reduced OBDD is constructed in
With aids of the above information, a generalized ROBDD diagram can be built, as shown in
1. Block T(i,j) is the Thevenin circuit that all independent sources are set to be zero, links {bL,1,bL,2, . . . bL,i} are opened, and link bL,j is replaced with a 1A current source.
2. Block O(k,i) is the kth-order moment model that links {bL,1,bL,2, . . . bL,i} are opened.
In the above example, circuits OOO, OOT, OTO, and TOO are equivalent to blocks O(k,3), T(3,3), T(3,2), and T(3,1), respectively. Similarly, circuits OO, OT, TO, O, and T behave as blocks O(k,2), T(2,2), T(2,1), O(k,1), and T(1,1), respectively. The solid and dash lines have the same definitions as in
The computational complexity can still retain linear as long as the number of links is much less than the number of nodes, i.e., t<<n. The complexity analysis is as follows. In
Experimental Results
As shown in
Although the invention has been explained in relation to its preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that many other possible modifications and variations can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as hereinafter claimed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3693081 | Aviander | Sep 1972 | A |
4250453 | Nilsson | Feb 1981 | A |
5379231 | Pillage et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5416300 | Hickl et al. | May 1995 | A |
5451905 | Gamand et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5617325 | Schaefer | Apr 1997 | A |
5883811 | Lam | Mar 1999 | A |
6047117 | Kahng et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6088523 | Nabors et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6308304 | Devgan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314546 | Muddu | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6347393 | Alpert et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6460165 | Ismail et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6601233 | Underwood | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6662149 | Devgan et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6789237 | Ismail | Sep 2004 | B1 |
7007249 | Ly et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7103863 | Riepe et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117461 | Srinivasan et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7124381 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20050021319 | Li et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050096888 | Ismail | May 2005 | A1 |
20060010406 | Lee et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060100830 | Lee et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060015832 A1 | Jan 2006 | US |