Method of monitoring partial discharges in a high voltage electric machine, and connection cable therefore

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10948843
  • Patent Number
    10,948,843
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 11, 2018
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 16, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
Partial discharges in a high voltage electric machine can be monitored by a partial discharge monitor connected to the high voltage electric machine successively via a capacitive coupler and a connection cable. The connection cable can have a conductive element designed to self-destruct in the presence of electric current amplitude significantly exceeding expected current amplitudes from said partial discharges, and having diameter designed to avoid creation of additional partial discharges within the cable itself. The connection cable can be light enough to avoid adding excessive weight to the stator windings.
Description
FIELD

The improvements generally relate to the field of connection cables used between the electric output leads of high-voltage electric apparatus and low power sensing devices, and more particularly between electric machines and the capacitive couplers used to monitor partial discharges occurring in the windings of those machines.


BACKGROUND


FIG. 1 represents a common scenario in which a high-voltage electric machine 20 (e.g. generator, motor, transformer or the like) is monitored by an electronic device which will be referred to herein as a partial discharge monitor 22 (also referred to as a partial discharge analyser). Such devices are well known in the art and can be obtained from certain manufacturers.


More specifically, the monitor 22 is intended to allow analysis of the quality and state of wear of the insulation of windings of the high-voltage electric machine 20 through the observation of partial discharges. Partial discharges can consist of small electrical discharges occurring within defects, such as air pockets, of the insulation. These small electrical discharges manifest themselves as high frequency current pulses.


A capacitive coupler 24 plays the role of a low frequency signal filter, i.e. essentially a selected capacitance circuitry that most preferably lets through high frequency signals at normally very small electrical currents. The capacitive coupler 24 can be connected on one end, via cables 26, to high-voltage leads of a stator or transformer windings (i.e. to the high-voltage electric machine 20), and on the other end to a ground through the partial discharge monitor, the latter typically being provided in the form of a secured low voltage device.


For partial discharges analysis, a reference signal, typically at 50 or 60 Hz frequency is required. The current intensity is in the order of 1 milli-Ampere and for high frequency signals, current intensity is in order of 1 pico-Ampere. The 50 Hz or 60 Hz voltage can be in the order of 15 kV to 24 kV at the measuring point.


In commonly available high-voltage capacitive couplers 24, connections with the high-voltage electric machine leads consist of cylindrical cables 26 that are available on the market, such as a “HV 200c/15 kV/AWG #2” 3 feet cable, which have a conductor diameter (6.54 mm in the case of AWG 2) designed to be sufficient to allow high current circulation and a very low electrical resistance and to avoid generating significant additional partial discharges of their own. An example of a connecting cable 26 is shown in FIG. 2. The connecting cable 26, has a conductor consisting of several conducting strands 1, surrounded by a filler 2 and by a jacket insulation 3. As mentioned earlier the large diameter conductor has a power transfer capacity being much greater than the power required during normal operation of the partial discharge monitor and could thus lead to undesirably high power conduction should the circuit be shorted. They are used for partial discharge measurement because of their availability on the market even though they are meant for totally different applications. This problem has been alleviated to a certain degree by some capacitive coupler manufacturers via the provision of a special fuse located before the capacitance. Nonetheless, there still remained room for improvement. Moreover, the cable has a significant weight which can create problems in adding a unwanted weight to the stator end windings.


SUMMARY

In accordance with one aspect, there is provided a cable having a conductor with limited amperage capacity and can thus serve as a fuse and self-destroy should unusually high currents be reached. In some embodiments, the cable can be designed to avoid noise generation (cable-imparted partial discharge) by maintaining a sufficient conductor diameter (e.g. above 4 mm, preferably at least 6 mm). Moreover, in some embodiments, the cable can have limited weight and thus avoid adding weight to the stator endwinding.


It was found that reducing the diameter of the cable could cause the cable to generate additional, self-imparted partial discharges, which is undesired. One way to calculate the minimal diameter for a given application is to use the electrostatic formula for a cylindrical charged conductor nearby a grounded plane surface keeping in mind the ionisation level of 3 kV/cm and, as far as the jacket isolation is concerned, the permittivity must be considered to keep the wanted level of isolation. In one embodiment, the cable is a replacement of the “HV 200c/15 kV/AWG #2 3 feet cable” which was used which has a conductor diameter of 6.54 mm. Even if 6.54 mm diameter conductors have been used satisfactorily in the past, it may be preferred to set a greater diameter as the minimum diamenter, for instance (e.g. 7 mm or 8 mm for instance). Because of the limitations with the heavy weight of the metallic cable, the specified isolation in the “HV 200c/15 kV/AWG #2 3 feet cable” is 15 kV. A greater insulation can be preferred in some embodiments. Moreover, lower weight, or linear density, would be compared. Achieving lower weight, or linear density, than the weight or linear density of the “HV 200c/15 kV/AWG #2” 3 feet cable can be preferred in some embodiments. In a cable, the heaviest component can be the conductor. Accordingly, reducing the weight of the conductor can significantly affect the weight of the cable. In one embodiment, the section (surface area) of the cable is reduced below the value of 33.6 mm2 which is typical for AWG 2, while maintaining a comparable, or perhaps even greater diameter, by using a metallic conductor having a relatively thin cylindrical, tubular shape which also limits the amount of electrical current intensity which can pass before the conductor self-destructs. Some semi-conductor materials have lower density than copper, and may be used while also providing lower, or comparable weight. Moreover, it can be preferred to provide the cable with a jacket insulation having above 15 kV, preferably above 20 kV, even preferably above 30 kV. In one embodiment, the cable can have a thin cylindrical conductor of tubular shape limiting the allowed current intensity to a critical value which can be in the order of magnitude of the Ampere, for instance, with a diameter in the range of 6-9 mm, a jacket insulation above 20 kV, and a low-weight filler within the tubular shape, for instance.


One way of achieving sufficient conductor diameter while providing limited amperage capacity is to provide the conductor in a tubular form, of a conductive material, filled by a cylindrical non-conductive support material. The thickness of the wall of the tube is then directly related to the maximum current capacity of the cable. Another way of achieving sufficient conductor diameter is to provide the conductor having a full diameter, but using a semi-conductor material instead of a conductive material. Indeed, the diameter of the conductive tube or of the semi-conductive core can be selected in a manner to avoid generating corona effects or additional partial discharges of their own. Accordingly, the risk of high power short-circuiting across the cable can be mitigated or avoided altogether while further avoiding the inconvenience of cable-imparted partial discharge.


In accordance with one aspect, there is provided a method of monitoring partial discharges in a high voltage electric machine, the method comprising: connecting a partial discharge monitor to the high voltage electric machine successively via a capacitive coupler and a connection cable, said connection cable having a conductive element designed to self-destruct in the presence of a current significantly exceeding expected current amplitudes from said partial discharges, and having a diameter sufficient to impede partial discharges within the cable itself; and monitoring said partial discharges via said connection cable.


In accordance with another aspect, there is provided a connection cable having a conductor element surrounded by a jacket, the conductor element having a cross-section area designed to self-destruct in the presence of a critical current amplitude, the critical current amplitude significantly exceeding expected current amplitudes from partial discharges of a high voltage electric machine, and a diameter sufficient to avoid significant partial discharges within the cable itself.


The cable as described hereinabove can be used to connect electric output leads of any suitable low power sensing device to a high-voltage electric machine.


In accordance with another aspect, there is provided a cable replacing at the same time the cable connecting a high-voltage electrical machine to a partial discharge capacitive coupler and the protecting fuse of the partial discharge capacitive coupler, and within which the conducting (or semi-conducting) element has a selected and pre-determined limited amperage capacity. Preferably, the diameter of the conducting element is selected in a manner to be large enough to avoid representing a source of noise due to partial discharge self-creation.


The conducting (or semi-conducting) element can be in the form of a hollow cylindrical flexible tube of a conductive material enveloping a non-conducting central also flexible cylinder, and being surrounded by a cylindrical insulation jacket. Alternately, the conducting element can be in the form of a full cylindrical flexible body of a semi-conductive material surrounded by a cylindrical insulation jacket, for instance.


Many further features and combinations thereof concerning the present improvements will appear to those skilled in the art following a reading of the instant disclosure.





DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

In the figures,



FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a partial discharge monitor connected to monitor partial discharges of a high voltage electrical machine;



FIG. 2 is an oblique, sectioned view of a connecting cable in accordance with the prior art;



FIG. 3 is an oblique, sectioned view of a first embodiment of a connecting cable;



FIG. 4 is an oblique, sectioned view of a second embodiment of a connecting cable; and



FIG. 5 is an oblique, sectioned view of a third embodiment of a connecting cable.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In many commonly used high voltage partial discharge couplers, the capacitance of the capacitor is 80 picofarads, the impedance is around 33 mega-ohms at 60 Hz and 40 mega-ohms at 50 Hz. The current then allowed by it is a maximum of 0.5 milli-Ampere. As frequencies increase, impedance decreases to 100 ohms at 20 MHz and 10 ohms at 200 MHz. At those very high frequencies that are of interest for partial discharge monitoring, impedance is low but the power of those high frequency signals is so weak that it is negligible compared to the main power of the machine.


Nonetheless, using a relatively large diameter of the conductor can minimize creation of additional partial discharges from the connecting cable, which could represent undesired noise to the monitor.


Partial discharge monitoring applications typically operate at voltages in the range of 15 kV to 24 kV. In such applications, the minimum diameter of the conductive or semi-conductive part should be at least comparable to the diameter of cable “HV 200c/15 kV/AWG #2 3 feet cable” (i.e. greater or equal to about 6.5 mm diameter) to avoid undesired partial discharge creation by the cable itself. In one embodiment, an improved cable can have lighter material (hollow design with smaller cross-sectional area of conductor or lighter-weight semi-conductor material), a 10 to 30% bigger diameter of the core (i.e. ˜7-8.5 mm), and add 20% to the jacket thickness.


In the case of partial discharge analysis of an electric machine operating at voltage higher than 25 kV; the minimal diameter of the conductive or semi-conductive part can be obtained using the electrostatic formula for a cylindrical charged conductor nearby a grounded plane surface keeping in mind the ionisation level of 3 kV/cm. As earlier mentioned, the lighter material for the new invention allows meeting for higher voltage specifications.


Referring to FIG. 3, the first example of a connecting cable 28 is presented. Connecting cable 28 is a cable with a conductor 4 having a very small diameter that tolerates a given current amplitude threshold, surrounded by a filler 5 and a large jacket insulation 6. The advantage of such configuration is that the conductor 4 can act as a fuse itself and self-destruct should the current amplitude threshold be exceeded. In the case of partial discharge monitoring, the given current amplitude threshold can be set below 1 Ampere, such as at 100 milli-Amperes for instance. Accordingly, no current having an intensity of several thousands of Amperes can be conveyed through the cable, thereby achieving the goal of protecting the partial discharge monitor from such large amplitude currents. However, the main drawback of this configuration is that the small diameter of conductor 4 may lead to partial discharge creation by the cable itself, a source of noise which could complicate or even prevent satisfactory partial discharge analysis.


Referring now to FIG. 4, a second example connecting cable 30 is presented. The proposed connecting cable 30 has an insulated core 7 surrounded by a tubular, thin-walled conducting envelope 8, itself surrounded by filler 9 and an insulated jacket 10. Conducting envelope 8 is designed to allow no more than the given electrical intensity threshold. It was found that this configuration could further eliminates the drawback of additional partial discharge creation, since the conductor diameter can technically be made the same or perhaps even larger than in the prior art cable configuration shown in FIG. 2.


Referring now to FIG. 5 a third example connecting cable 32 is presented. The proposed connecting cable consists of a semi-conductor 11, surrounded by filler 12 and jacket insulation 13. The diameter of the semi-conductor 11 is the same as or larger than in the FIG. 2 configuration. The composition of semi-conductor 11 is designed to self-destruct if the given electrical intensity threshold is exceeded.


Preferably, the connecting cables of FIG. 4 or FIG. 5 are designed to add not more than tens of Ohms of impedance to the whole partial discharge measuring circuit by the proposed configurations, and the additional impedance will thus be negligible, especially in the context of partial discharge analysis based on trend analysis. Moreover, preferably, the measuring circuitry is not changed.


As can be understood, the examples described above and illustrated are intended to be exemplary only. The scope is indicated by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A connection cable for monitoring partial discharges in a high voltage electric machine, the connection cable having a semi-conductor element surrounded by a jacket, the jacket providing an insulation of above 15 kV, the semi-conductor element configured to limit a current capacity and having a cross-section area designed to self-destruct in the presence of a critical current amplitude, the critical current amplitude being below the thousands of amperes range, above 100 milli-Amperes, and significantly exceeding expected current amplitudes from the partial discharges of the high voltage electric machine, the semi-conductor element having a diameter of at least 6 mm and sufficient to avoid significant partial discharges within the cable itself.
  • 2. The connection cable of claim 1 wherein the critical current amplitude is above 1 Ampere.
  • 3. The connection cable of claim 1 wherein the diameter of the semi-conductor element if of at least 7 mm.
  • 4. The connection cable of claim 1 wherein the diameter of the semi-conductor element is of at least 8 mm.
  • 5. The connection cable of claim 1 wherein the linear weight is of below the linear weight of a HV 200 c/15 kV/AWG 2 cable.
  • 6. The connection cable of claim 1 wherein the jacket provides an insulation of above 20 kV.
  • 7. The connection cable of claim 1 wherein the critical current amplitude is in the order of magnitude of an ampere.
  • 8. The connection cable of claim 1 wherein the critical current amplitude is below 1 ampere.
  • 9. The connection cable of claim 1 wherein the diameter is no more than 9 mm.
  • 10. The connection cable of claim 1 wherein the diameter of the semi-conductor element further avoids generating corona effects.
  • 11. The connection cable of claim 1 wherein the semi-conductor element is surrounded by a filler.
  • 12. The connection cable of claim 1 wherein the semi-conductor element is provided in the form of a tubular member and is filled by a cylindrical support member made of a non-conductive material.
  • 13. The connection cable of claim 1 wherein the semi-conductor element is provided in the form of a cylindrical member made of semi-conductive material.
  • 14. The connection cable of claim 1 having no more than tens of Ohms of impedance.
US Referenced Citations (91)
Number Name Date Kind
4158169 Harrold et al. Jun 1979 A
4385271 Kurtz et al. May 1983 A
4446420 Drouet May 1984 A
4779051 Griinewald et al. Oct 1988 A
4897607 Griinewald et al. Jan 1990 A
4929903 Saigo et al. May 1990 A
4967158 Gonzalez Oct 1990 A
5146170 Ishikawa et al. Sep 1992 A
5200737 Konishi et al. Apr 1993 A
5386193 Maeda et al. Jan 1995 A
5396180 Hampton et al. Mar 1995 A
5475312 Sedding et al. Dec 1995 A
5506511 Nilsson et al. Apr 1996 A
5530364 Mashikian et al. Jun 1996 A
5530366 Nasrallah Jun 1996 A
5642038 Kim et al. Jun 1997 A
5767684 Steennis Jun 1998 A
5804972 de Kock et al. Sep 1998 A
5854556 Steennis et al. Dec 1998 A
5982181 Rokunohe et al. Nov 1999 A
6078180 Jenkinson Jun 2000 A
6172862 Jonnatti et al. Jan 2001 B1
6192317 Yazici et al. Feb 2001 B1
6255808 Hicker Jul 2001 B1
6285538 Krahn Sep 2001 B1
6297642 Shibahara et al. Oct 2001 B1
6297645 Eriksson et al. Oct 2001 B1
6300768 Kato et al. Oct 2001 B1
6313640 Nasrallah et al. Nov 2001 B1
6333715 Kato et al. Dec 2001 B1
6340890 Bengtsson et al. Jan 2002 B1
6420879 Cooke Jul 2002 B2
6424162 Rokunohe et al. Jul 2002 B1
6433557 Rashkes et al. Aug 2002 B1
6445189 Pakonen et al. Sep 2002 B1
6448782 Pakonen et al. Sep 2002 B1
6483316 Kato et al. Nov 2002 B2
6489782 Baier et al. Dec 2002 B1
6504382 Smith et al. Jan 2003 B2
6507181 Pakonen et al. Jan 2003 B1
6518772 Milkovic et al. Feb 2003 B1
6774639 Unsworth Aug 2004 B1
6930491 Gregory et al. Aug 2005 B2
6930610 Gao et al. Aug 2005 B2
6937027 Koo et al. Aug 2005 B2
7030621 Sarkozi et al. Apr 2006 B2
7071701 Roman et al. Jul 2006 B2
7081757 Unsworth et al. Jul 2006 B2
7112968 Nishizawa Sep 2006 B1
7145345 Sarkozi et al. Dec 2006 B2
7154279 Gregory et al. Dec 2006 B2
7161873 Kuppuswamy et al. Jan 2007 B2
7180303 Chen et al. Feb 2007 B1
7183776 Hicks et al. Feb 2007 B1
7202672 Hicks et al. Apr 2007 B2
7256584 Moriyama et al. Aug 2007 B2
7282923 Goodrich et al. Oct 2007 B2
7285960 Koch et al. Oct 2007 B2
7285961 Shinmoto et al. Oct 2007 B2
7388384 Kato et al. Jun 2008 B2
7579843 Younsi et al. Aug 2009 B2
7746082 Maruyama et al. Jun 2010 B2
7782063 Ohtsuka et al. Aug 2010 B2
8008925 Twerdochlib Aug 2011 B2
8008926 Park et al. Aug 2011 B2
8010239 Jeong Aug 2011 B2
8098072 TWerdochlib Jan 2012 B2
8143899 Younsi et al. Mar 2012 B2
8179146 Nam et al. May 2012 B2
8193818 Horowy et al. Jun 2012 B2
8199343 Wayman et al. Jun 2012 B2
8234085 Montanari et al. Jul 2012 B2
8242786 Fuhrmann et al. Aug 2012 B2
8294471 Park et al. Oct 2012 B2
8467982 Serra et al. Jun 2013 B2
8525523 Kerl et al. Sep 2013 B2
8527221 Montanari et al. Sep 2013 B2
8575943 Emanuel et al. Nov 2013 B2
8760171 Steineke et al. Jun 2014 B2
8797045 Elze et al. Aug 2014 B2
8816694 Obata et al. Aug 2014 B2
8816700 Di Stefano et al. Aug 2014 B2
8843349 Kang et al. Sep 2014 B2
8981761 Maruyama et al. Mar 2015 B2
20010048305 Borsi Dec 2001 A1
20080088314 Younsi et al. Apr 2008 A1
20090189594 Cern Jul 2009 A1
20100013494 Twerdochib Jan 2010 A1
20100073008 Twerdochib Mar 2010 A1
20110030994 Widmer Feb 2011 A1
20170317484 Nakada Nov 2017 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
Elliot Electric Supply, Bussmann Series Full Line Catalog, Jul. 2015, EEI-NEMA Type K and T-Type H and N, EES Spec Sheet, http://www.elliottelectric.com/P/Item/CPS/FL3K8/Similar (Year: 2015).
Braidless Silicone 150, p. 5, Nov. 2012 https://www.mayerelectric.com/ASSETS/DOCUMENTS/CMS/EN/RAXNPA16T007GRAY.pdf (Year: 2012).
Wiki Open Electrical, Partial Discharge, retrieved from Internet, Aug. 11, 2015.
IEEE Xplore, In-Service Partial Discharge Testing of Generator Insulation, M. Kurtz and G. C. Stone, Ontario Hydro, Research Division, Toronto, Canada, IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul, vol. EI-14 N°2, Apr. 1979.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180356457 A1 Dec 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62518257 Jun 2017 US