The present invention relates to the field of plasma torches. More specifically, the invention concerns a method of controlling the wear of at least one of the electrodes of a non-transferred arc plasma torch.
It also concerns a non-transferred arc plasma torch for implementing this method.
A plasma torch is a system allowing electrical energy to be transformed into high-density thermal energy. An electric arc caused between two electrodes is typically utilized to provide the energy required to ionize a plasma-generating gas.
Plasma torches are used in industry, for example for depositing metal or for welding, or to destroy certain products such as hazardous waste.
Non-transferred arc plasma torches, also known as sprayed-arc torches, comprise two electrodes between which a sustained electric arc is generated. Since these electrodes are contained within the plasma torch, the electric arc is confined within the torch. On contact with this electric arc, the flow of gas injected into the torch is brought to a very high temperature and ionized.
The gas thus heated flows by the open extremity of one of the electrodes, known as the downstream electrode. Only the gas ejected at high temperature, or cone plasma, is consequently visible outside the torch.
Thus while the temperature of the cone plasma is 5,000° C., the temperature of the electric arc and, in particular, of the arc roots, is typically 20,000° C.
Since this temperature is higher than the melting temperature of the electrodes, vaporization of the electrodes at the arc roots, whatever the material used to manufacture these electrodes, is inevitable.
Although the electrodes are typically cooled, they constitute consumable items that must be replaced after a longer or shorter time of service.
The life-span of the cooled electrodes can vary from a hundred hours for relatively low power torches to a thousand hours for high-power torches.
For many years, research work has therefore been carried out to improve the life of the electrodes of the plasma torches so as to make them compatible with industrial requirements.
Firstly, it has been observed that the life of the electrodes was dependent on several parameters.
It is therefore possible to act on the shape of the electrodes and the choice of their constitutive material. Nevertheless, as the cone plasma is sprinkled with metal particles coming from the wear of the electrodes, the material or materials chosen must be compatible with the applications envisaged for the plasma torch.
In order to limit the average surface temperature of the electrodes, they can also be cooled, for example by implementing water circulation, generally demineralized.
It is also possible to limit the arc current for a given torch operating power. In effect, at the arc roots, the flow of calories to be evacuated increases with the current set at the electrodes' terminals.
Thus, for a given torch power, the possibility of realizing this power by a voltage-current pair favoring voltage over current is a major element since the wear of the electrodes is reduced.
However, all of these parameters belong to the design of a plasma torch. Thus, these parameters can no longer be modified after commissioning of this torch has taken place.
Distributing the erosion induced at the root of the electric arc over the largest possible electrode surface has even been proposed. Avoiding having the arc root remain attached to a single point of the electrode's surface, leading to its very rapid erosion, is sought through such a method of controlling the position of the root of the electric arc.
This control of the position of the arc root at the electrode's surface can be realized by injecting a variable flow of plasma-generating gas.
Advantageously, such a control is therefore realized solely by managing the plasma-generating gas inlet control valve. This management does not lead to modifications in the usages of the plasma torch.
Nevertheless, this method is not very flexible since it is thus essential to limit the ranges of flow variations in order to prevent the root of the electric arc possibly leaving the work area at the surface of the corresponding electrode. In addition, flow variations that are too great prevent good stability of the electric arc inside the plasma torch being obtained.
Control of the position of the arc root at the electrode's surface can also be realized by applying a fixed magnetic field, with mechanical mobility of the permanent magnet generating this magnetic field.
Such a control allows the wear at the electrode's surface to be distributed over a range of lengths related to the magnitude of the permanent magnet's displacement.
However, the displacement of this permanent magnet is completely independent of the plasma torch's operating point and, when it reaches the end of travel, the wear is greatly accelerated at the place where the arc root was fitted since the latter then describes a simple rotation. In addition, this magnet's displacement speed is generally constant over a defined time period.
Controlling the position of the arc root at the electrode's surface can also be realized by applying a variable magnetic field.
Document FR 2 609 358 discloses a non-transferred arc plasma torch comprising a field coil surrounding the torch's upstream electrode and an electrical circuit allowing this coil to be powered with a variable direct current such that a longitudinal displacement is described at the arc root in contact with this upstream electrode, on which is superimposed an oscillation of the arc root during this travel.
This method makes it possible to increase the number of degrees of freedom for control of the position of electric arc roots.
However, this oscillation of the arc root remains limited in excursion of the electrode's surface. This limitation of the surface seen by the arc root does not allow erosion of the electrode to be optimized.
Moreover, this solution is expensive and induces power consumption in addition to the power consumption of the plasma torch. The advantage of such technology disappears for plasma torches with power of less than 1 MW.
Furthermore, this technology of a field coil in the form of a disk is bulky (weight and dimensions), which makes it difficult to implement this type of torch in a constrained environment.
While these systems for controlling the displacement of the arc root have allowed the operational life of the electrodes to be extended, they can still be improved to distribute the wear of the electrode better.
The short life-span of the electrodes is indeed a significant disadvantage for some industrial applications.
The aim of the present invention is therefore to propose a method of controlling the wear of at least one of the electrodes of a plasma torch, simple in its design and method of operation, for optimizing the position of the root of the electric arc on the surface of this electrode and, consequently, the life-span of these electrodes.
To this end, the invention relates to a method of controlling the wear of at least one of the electrodes of a plasma torch, this torch comprising two electrodes having the same main axis between which an arc is established, these electrodes being separated by a chamber designed to receive a plasma-generating gas, and at least one means for generating a magnetic field placed locally to the at least one electrode for which the control of wear is sought, in which the arc root is made to sweep longitudinally over a portion of the surface of this electrode starting from an initial position up to the point where said arc root reaches a defined final position on said portion involving the change of this electrode, the longitudinal progression of this arc root being defined by a function dependent on at least the time, f(t), which is fixed.
According to the invention, at least the electrical energy consumed by this torch is measured as a function of the time from the commissioning of said electrode, these measurements are recorded in a storage unit and, based on the temporal evolution of at least this electrical energy consumed over at least part of these measurements, a variable ξ(t) is defined for adjusting the function f(t) over a period of time τ determined by this electrode's state of wear.
“Since the electrode was commissioned” means that these measurements are made in real time or at regular intervals from a new, or not, electrode. In the latter case, the initial and intermediate positions can nevertheless be determined in order to be able to resume control of electrode's wear at the position where it was interrupted in case of maintenance on the plasma torch for example.
“Electrodes having the same main axis” means that these electrodes are coaxial or that the upstream electrode, identified with respect to the direction of the plasma flow, has the same main axis as the downstream electrode.
“Locally” means that the means for generating a magnetic field creates a magnetic field at the electrode for which the control of wear is sought, so as to cause the displacement of the arc root on the surface of the electrode in question.
Purely for purposes of illustration, the plasma torch comprises a field coil surrounding the upstream electrode for generating a local magnetic field at this electrode; this coil is also fixed in position but powered with a variable direct current i(t) (=f(t)).
It is known that a set point of the current powering the field coil corresponds to a given position of the arc root on the upstream electrode. In addition, as this torch has a given configuration (geometry of the upstream electrode, electromagnetic characteristics of the field coil, etc.), it is possible to determine experimentally, by methods known to those skilled in the art, the curve representative of the position of the arc root on the upstream electrode according to the amperage applied to the field coil. Thus, having determined the equation of this curve and knowing the i(t) distribution (regular or not alternative sweep, pulsating ripple, etc.) governing the longitudinal progression of the arc root on the surface of the electrode, the person skilled in the art can control the electrode's wear by the longitudinal sweeping of arc root on the upstream electrode's surface between two positions.
However, the torch's operating conditions can vary over time, the torch not working at full capacity continuously, for instance. On the contrary, the plasma torch can experience periods of being on standby or power variations over time depending on the applications envisaged for this torch.
The wear of the electrode for a set point of the arc current is then slowed or, in contrast, accelerated.
The adjustment variable ξ(t) then makes it possible to take into account not only the electrode's “assumed state” as defined by the function f(t) but its actual state, which depends on the plasma torch's actual stresses.
If the electrode wear is, for example, low for a set point of i(t) at time to since the torch is on standby, maintaining the arc root longer in the corresponding position on the electrode surface will therefore be sought so as to lengthen this electrode's life. For this, an adjustment, or corrective, variable ξ(t)=icor(t) will be applied such that the variable direct current applied to the field coil to control the position of the arc root is iB(t)=i(t)−icor(t) for a duration τ determined not only by the time during which the plasma torch remains on standby but also by the time necessary to reach a state of wear requiring switching to another point on the surface of the electrode for which the control of wear is sought.
In the case where the same field coil is mechanically displaced more in translation, then the adjustment variable ξ(t) is a function of the form F(i(t), z(t)).
Of course, the operations determining the adjustment variable ξ(t) can be performed by a computer that controls the means of controlling the position of the arc root. In the case of a field coil, for example, this computer controls the current powering this coil.
In different particular embodiments of this method, each having its specific advantages and capable of numerous possible technical combinations:
This measurement of the arc current advantageously allows a more accurate determination of the adjustment variable ξ(t) of the function f(t). In effect, there can be different arc currents for the same electrical power Parc consumed by the torch.
When this means for generating a magnetic field is a field coil, it will preferably be a disk type for the upstream electrode.
According to different variants, this coil may be comprised of:
The coil may surround the electrode locally but the center of the coil is not necessarily linked to the center of the electrode along the axis of the torch.
Alternatively, the coil can be connected either in series with the electrode, or in parallel, i.e. without any electrical contact with the electrode.
The coil may also be longer, shorter or have the same dimension as the electrode.
For reasons of compactness, the diameter of this field coil can be reduced (loss of radial field). This loss of radial field can then be partially compensated for by adding one or more permanent magnets over all or part of the length of the field coil.
If this permanent magnet or these permanent magnets are cylindrical in shape, they will be then be coaxial to one of the electrodes.
One or more permanent magnets having different fields from the previous ones can be positioned outside the field coil, either upstream or downstream, in order to locally modify the shape of the field.
These means for controlling the electrode's wear can therefore act together to combine their effects.
The invention will be described in more detail with reference to the drawings included in an appendix, in which:
These electrodes 1, 2 are separated from each other by a chamber 3 designed to receive a plasma-generating gas.
An energy supply system 4 connected to these two electrodes 1, 2 allows a potential difference to be applied between them causing a sustained electric arc 5.
The arc current Iarc and the arc voltage Uarc are measured to determine the electrical power consumed Parc=Iarc×Uarc.
The plasma-generating gas, which is supplied by a gas supply source 6, is forced into this chamber 3. This plasma-generating gas is preferably introduced between the electrodes 1, 2 with a swirling movement, or in a vortex, so as to ensure a sheathing by the gaseous fluid and a stabilization of the electric arc.
Secondly, this swirling motion ensures a natural rotational movement of the upstream and downstream arc roots on the surface of the corresponding electrodes.
The means of generating a magnetic field advantageously comprises a field coil 7 that is powered with a variable direct current 8. “Variable direct current” means a direct current whose current varies with time.
This field coil 7 is here placed around the upstream electrode 1, so as to control the position of the upstream arc root on the surface of this electrode.
Preferably, the current of this variable direct current comprises a current I2 superimposed on a current I1, I2 being an oscillation such that I2<I1, the variation of current I1 being chosen from the group comprising linear variation, variation by stages, exponential variation, logarithmic variation, variation according to a polynomial function, or a combination of these elements.
Purely for purposes of illustration, the plasma torch is powered with a variable direct current whose base current I1 varies by stages, each stage having a duration of several hundred hours, the electrode's wear thus occurring in “phases”. Alternatively, this current I1 can vary linearly or according to a “curve” distribution, e.g. exponential or polynomial.
The magnitude and frequency of this oscillation can vary over time depending on the electrical energy consumed by the plasma torch and the electrode's state of wear. Typically, the magnitude will be more limited when the torch is in an extreme operating range (low power, nominal power). The frequency of the wave will depend on the torch's operating enthalpy.
The waveform will be selected according to the stability of the torch's operating points observed. If the torch power varies discretely from one power to another in a programmed way, a square waveform will be preferred.
Given the mean current, that the field coil, when it reaches its maximum, can not sufficiently push the electric arc towards the downstream of the torch, copper remains unseen by the arc roots. It will therefore be advantageous to put the field coil in motion by displacing it. This displacement thus makes it possible to lower the value of the mean current through the field coil and apply new distributions for the increase in the mean current and also ripple waveforms.
To achieve this, the plasma torch comprises means 9 for displacing said at least one means of generating a magnetic field 7 along the main axis so as to vary the position on the electrode for which control of the wear of the root of the electric arc generated between these electrodes 1, 2 is sought.
These means 9 here comprise a worm screw driven in rotation by a motor. The field coil 7 is connected to this screw so that the rotation of the worm screw causes a translation of the field coil 7.
In the scenario in which moving said at least one means of generating a magnetic field either side of a reference position is wished, this motor may, for example, be a reciprocating motor.
Advantageously, the injection of a secondary plasma-generating gas 10 may also be modulated in a known way, so as to control the position of the arc root.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0858823 | Dec 2008 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/067418 | 12/17/2009 | WO | 00 | 8/15/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/070051 | 6/24/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3376211 | Bjornson | Apr 1968 | A |
4683367 | Drouet | Jul 1987 | A |
4780591 | Bernecki et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4847466 | Pasquini et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
5719371 | Spariat | Feb 1998 | A |
7608797 | Belashchenko et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
8080759 | Belaschenko | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8183495 | Bijker et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 204 052 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0 750 451 | Dec 1996 | EP |
2 609 358 | Jul 1988 | FR |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Feb. 17, 2010, corresponding to the PCT application. |
Oliver, et al., “Control of Arc Plasma Torches: Compensation of Operational Enthalpy Drifts”, Journal of Physics Publishing, Bristol, GB, vol. 113 No. 1, May 1, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110284504 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |