Patent Application
20130331140
The invention relates to a method of operating a base station for a cellular communications network. The invention further relates to a base station for a cellular communications network.
Conventional base stations for cellular communications networks comprise antenna systems having one or more antennas which are mounted and adjusted during an installation of the base station in the field. Particularly, a tilt angle between a main beam direction of the antenna's characteristic beam pattern and a horizontal plane is manually adjusted by service technicians during the installation. After the installation, the tilt angle remains fixed, or it is adjusted electronically in a long-term scale, e.g. adapting to the traffic load during a day. However, this conventional installation generally applies the same tilt angle to all terminals in the cell.
There is a need to provide a more sophisticated base station and method of operating a base station which offer increased flexibility regarding the operational characteristics of the base station.
According to the present invention, regarding the above mentioned method of operating a base station, this object is achieved by: the base station determining at least two terminals which are served by the base station and which are scheduled for the same primary radio resource, the base station assigning individual portions of a secondary radio resource, which is different from said primary radio resource, to said at least two terminals depending on a parameter which characterizes a vertical angle between a virtual horizontal plane associated with said base station and a specific one of said terminals.
The vertical angle can be interpreted as an optimum downtilt or tilt angle which, when implemented by the base station, leads to optimum transmission conditions with respect to a specific terminal because a main lobe of a beam pattern of the base station's antenna would then be directed at said specific terminal. By assigning the second radio resource to said at least two terminals depending on a parameter which characterizes said vertical angle, a particularly efficient reduction of interference between neighboring cells may be achieved.
According to an embodiment, the vertical angle may e.g. correspond with a direction of the most distinctive propagation path (i.e., the path which offers a maximum received signal power) between the base station and the terminal. It is to be noted that, especially due to the effect of multipath propagation, a direction between the base station and the terminal as characterized by the vertical angle may differ from an angle that corresponds with a “direct line of sight”—type direction, because, due to reflections and other effects associated with multipath propagation, the “direct line of sight”—type direction may not necessarily be associated with the most distinctive propagation path (i.e., the path which offers a maximum received signal power).
Advantageously, the method according to the embodiments does not require assessing feedback information or transmission quality information. Further, the method according to the embodiments does not require any inter-base station communication, e.g. between neighbouring base stations.
According to a preferred embodiment, said base station comprises an antenna a tilt angle of which can be controlled, wherein said base station uses individual tilt angles for single terminals and/or groups of terminals depending on said parameter which characterizes said vertical angle. Thus, individual terminals may optimally be served by the base station by adapting its antenna beam pattern to the respective terminals. However, if the antenna system is capable of implementing only comparatively few different values of the tilt angle, the terminals under consideration by the base station (i.e. those terminals which are scheduled for the same primary radio resource) are grouped into various terminal groups according to their respective vertical angles. I.e., several terminals having similar vertical angles may be put into one terminal group which is associated with one of the discrete tilt angles that may be used by the base station.
According to a particularly preferred embodiment, said primary radio resource is time, preferably transmission time slots, and said secondary radio resource is frequency, preferably frequency subchannels. For instance, cellular communications networks according to the LTE standard provide using transmission time slots and frequency subchannels as primary and secondary radio resources.
However, the present embodiments are not limited to this particular combination of radio resources. For instance, besides allocating frequency resources (such as e.g. frequency subchannels) to users/terminals that are served during the same time slot as described above, the principle according to the embodiments can generally also be applied by allocating different time resources (i.e., time slots) to users/terminals that are served on the same frequency resource (i.e., in this case, frequency is considered as the primary radio resource).
Apart from time and frequency, preferably orthogonal, codes may also be considered as radio resource in the sense of the present invention. Thus, a first radio resource may be frequency, and a second radio resource may be a specific code, and the like. In this case, the radio resource “code” is assigned to the various terminals served on the same frequency resources depending on the vertical angle.
According to a further preferred embodiment, said base station assigns a first number of, preferably adjacent, frequency subchannels to a first one of said at least two terminals, and said base station assigns a second number of, preferably adjacent, frequency subchannels to a second one of said at least two terminals. Within LTE systems, for example, resource blocks (RB) may be used to represent said frequency subchannels according to the present embodiment. The first and/or second number of frequency subchannels, are not necessarily adjacent to each other. Other types of assignment, i.e. comprising non-adjacent subchannels, are also possible.
According to a further preferred embodiment, said base station sorts said at least two terminals depending on said parameter which characterizes said vertical angle associated with said terminals to obtain a sorted list of terminals, and said base station assigns said portions of said secondary radio resource depending on said sorted list of terminals, which represents a particularly efficient assignment technique.
Generally, said parameter which characterizes said vertical angle may e.g. be estimated and/or approximated, e.g. by determining a relative distance between the base station and the specific terminal (using signal strength measurements, delay measurements, and the like). Destination of arrival estimation techniques may also be employed.
According to a further preferred embodiment, said step of assigning said secondary radio resource is performed according to a predetermined scheme, particularly independent of feedback information that characterizes an actual quality of transmission between the base station and individual terminals. Thus, the embodiments represent a very simple, decentralized measure to distribute secondary radio resources to different terminals in the sense of decreasing an overall interference between neighbouring cells. It is particularly advantageous, if neighboring base stations employ different variants of the scheme according to the embodiments so as e.g. not to assign the same secondary radio resources (e.g., frequency bands) to those of their terminals which are in a cell border region, i.e. close to the neighboring base station. This may e.g. be ensured when deploying the base stations by providing different “start values” to the inventive radio resource assignment scheme such that neighboring base stations do not employ identical variants of the scheme.
According to a further preferred embodiment, said predetermined scheme associates values and/or value ranges of said parameter which characterizes a vertical angle with respective portions of said secondary radio resources.
Generally, an adjustment of the tilt angle may be performed in different ways. Firstly, if the base station's antenna is a phase-controlled antenna the beam pattern of which can be dynamically controlled by altering a phase of at least one signal supplied to an antenna element of said antenna (which is usually done by a corresponding antenna controller), an adjustment of the tilt angle may possibly be achieved by correspondingly controlling the beam pattern. I.e., the antenna may be electrically controlled so as to alter the tilt angle between an axis of a main lobe of said beam pattern and a horizontal plane.
Secondly, if the base station's antenna is not a phase-controlled antenna but rather a conventional antenna without the possibility of electrically controlling the beam pattern, and especially the tilt angle of the main lobe axis, a tilt angle adjustment in the sense of the embodiments may be accomplished by mechanical driving means which rotate the antenna around a predetermined axis such as e.g. an axis in the horizontal plane which extends substantially perpendicularly to the direction of propagation defined by the main lobe of the beam pattern.
Third, antennas with a limited number of adjustable downtilts, realized by different feeder networks within the antenna for the antenna elements, and selection of the appropriate one by mechanically or electronically switching between the available feeder networks, may also be employed for tilt angle adjustment according to an embodiment.
Of course, a combination of the aforementioned methods may also be employed for tilt angle adjustment.
A further solution to the object of the present invention is given by a base station according to claim 9. Further advantageous embodiments of the invention are given in the dependent claims.
Further features, aspects and advantages of the present invention are given in the following detailed description with reference to the drawings in which:
a, 5b, 5c depict different resource assignment schemes according to an embodiment.
A base station 100 of a cellular communications network is depicted. The base station 100 may serve a number of terminals 10, 11, 12 by providing radio coverage in form of a radio cell 110 in a per se known manner. For instance, the base station 100 may operate according to at least one of the following standards: GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications), UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunications System), LTE (Long Term Evolution), WiMax (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access), WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network). For the further exemplary explanations, it is assumed that the base station 100 is an LTE-compatible base station.
Further neighbouring radio cells 120, 130 of the communications network are also depicted by
Generally, even further base stations and their associated cells may also be provided within the network. Those further devices and cells are only indicated by dashed lines within
As can be gathered from
Generally, the direction los12 associated with the vertical angle θ12 does not necessarily represent a direction of a “line of sight” between the devices 100, 12, because due to effects such as multipath propagation, the most distinctive propagation path (i.e., the path which offers a maximum received signal power) between the base station 100 and the terminal 12 may require a vertical angle θ12 different from a direction of the “line of sight” between the devices 100, 12. Presently, for illustration and simplification purposes, however,
For instance, the further terminal 10, which is presently further away from the base station 100 (also cf.
Generally, the vertical angle θ12 associated with a terminal 12 corresponds with an optimum downtilt angle for the antenna 102. I.e., if the base station 100 controls its antenna pattern to assume the respective vertical angle θ12 as downtilt angle, optimum communications conditions for communications with the specific terminal 12 are ensured.
According to a preferred embodiment, the base station 100 is configured to determine 200 (cf. the flow chart of
In the exemplary context of an LTE system, the primary radio resource is time, preferably transmission time slots according to LTE standard, and said secondary radio resource is frequency, preferably frequency subchannels according to LTE standard.
I.e., in the first step 200 (
For instance, in step 200, the base station 100 determines that the two terminals 10, 11 are scheduled for a same transmission time slot. Thus, the assignment of the secondary radio resource, i.e. frequency subchannels, is performed as follows:
The base station 100 determines, which of the terminals 10, 11 has the smallest vertical angle. Presently, terminal 10 has the smallest vertical angle θ10, since it is at a border of the radio cell 110 (
Depending on this sequence of the terminals 10, 11 regarding their vertical angles, the base station 100 assigns frequency subchannels to the terminals for a future data communications which is performed on the same primary radio resource, i.e., transmission time slot. For instance, a first group Ci of frequency subchannels, cf.
The above explained resource assignment depending on the vertical angle of the terminals 10, 11 is particularly efficient and requires no coordination of the base station 100 with neighbour base stations in order decrease interference.
Moreover, according to the present embodiment, the base station 100 is not required to alter its tilt angle at all. It may rather “only” perform the inventive assignment of the secondary radio resource depending on the vertical angle that results from the relative position between base station and the terminals, i.e. without providing individual tilt angles for the respective terminals.
However, according to a further advantageous embodiment, the base station 100 may also adapt its tilt angle, preferably on a per-terminal basis. With this embodiment, in addition to the above explained assignment of subchannels according to
According to an embodiment, said base station 100 is configured to use individual tilt angles for single terminals 10, 11, 12. This can e.g. be done, if the base station comprises an electric tilt angle control which allows to control the tilt angle within a wide range of tilt angle values.
However, if the base station 100 can only provide for comparatively few different tilt angles, groups of terminals which have similar vertical angles may be served with the same tilt angle.
According to an embodiment, said base station 100 is configured to sort said at least two terminals 10, 11, 12 depending on said parameter which characterizes said vertical angle θ12, . . . associated with said terminals 10, 11, 12 to obtain a sorted list of terminals 10, 11, 12, and to assign said portions of said secondary radio resource depending on said sorted list of terminals 10, 11, 12. I.e., each terminal 10, 11, 12 is sorted according to its associated vertical angle θ10, . . . , θ12.
Generally, said parameter which characterizes said vertical angle may e.g. be estimated and/or approximated, e.g. by determining a relative distance between the base station 100 and the specific terminal 10 (using signal strength measurements, delay measurements, and the like).
Destination of arrival estimation techniques may also be employed.
After the sorting step, the assignment of the secondary radio resource is performed.
According to a further preferred embodiment, said step 210 of assigning said secondary radio resource is performed according to a predetermined scheme, particularly independent of feedback information that characterizes an actual quality of transmission between the base station 100 and individual terminals 10, 11, 12. Thus, the embodiments represent a very simple, decentralized measure to distribute secondary radio resources to different terminals 10, 11, 12 in the sense of decreasing an overall interference between neighbouring cells.
It is particularly advantageous, if neighboring base stations employ different variants of the scheme according to the embodiments so as e.g. not to assign the same secondary radio resources (e.g., frequency bands) to those of their terminals which are in a cell border region, i.e. close to the neighboring base station. This may e.g. be ensured when deploying the base stations by providing different “start values” to the inventive radio resource assignment scheme such that neighboring base stations do not employ identical variants of the scheme.
For example, considering that the base station 100 (
For instance, the first base station 100 employs the table depicted by
For instance, the first terminal 10 is assigned the secondary resources RB0 . . . RB16, the second terminal 11 is assigned the secondary resources RB17 . . . RB32, and the third terminal 12 is assigned the secondary resources RB33 . . . RB50 within the radio cell 110 of the first base station 100.
The second base station (not shown), which provides the neighboring radio cell 120 for the terminals 20, 21, 22, however, uses a slightly different variant of the assignment scheme, namely the table according to
Thus, in the second radio cell 120, the first terminal 20 is assigned the secondary resources RB17 . . . RB32, the second terminal 21 is assigned the secondary resources RB33 . . . RB50, and the third terminal 22 is assigned the secondary resources RB0 . . . RB16 by its base station (not shown).
Likewise, the third base station (not shown), which is also co-located with the first base station 100, will assign frequency resources according to the table depicted by
In effect, because the vertical angle usually correlates with a distance of a terminal to its base station, the above explained assignment schemes ensure that a distance-dependent distribution/assignment of secondary radio resources is performed within a cell. By employing permutations of said assignment schemes as exemplified by
The resource assignment according to the embodiments may rather be performed individually by each base station 100, independent of other base station. To ensure that neighboring base stations each start with different secondary resources values for the assignment, e.g. an offset within a respective table (
According to a particularly preferred embodiment, said primary radio resource is time, preferably transmission time slots, and said secondary radio resource is frequency, preferably frequency subchannels, as already explained above. For instance, cellular communications networks according to the LTE standard provide using transmission time slots and frequency subchannels as primary and secondary radio resources. However, the present embodiments are not limited to this particular combination of radio resources. For instance, besides allocating frequency resources (such as e.g. frequency subchannels) to users/terminals that are served during the same time slot as described above, the principle according to the embodiments can generally also be applied by allocating different time resources (i.e., time slots) to users/terminals that are served on the same frequency resource (i.e., in this case, frequency is considered as the primary radio resource).
Apart from time and frequency, preferably orthogonal, codes may also be considered as radio resource in the sense of the present invention. Thus, a first radio resource may be frequency, and a second radio resource may be a specific code, and the like. In this case, the radio resource “code” is assigned to the various terminals served on the same frequency resources depending on the vertical angle.
The above described examples comprise a particularly simple assignment rule for assignment of secondary radio resources to the terminals. However, more complex assignment schemes may also be applied.
The embodiments explained above are not limited to base stations 100 of cellular communications networks. The inventive principle may rather be applied to any base station serving a plurality of terminals and employing primary and secondary radio resources. Typically, the principle may be applied with GSM-, UMTS-, LTE-, and WiMAX-base stations.
The description and drawings merely illustrate the principles of the invention. It will thus be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise various arrangements that, although not explicitly described or shown herein, embody the principles of the invention and are included within its spirit and scope. Furthermore, all examples recited herein are principally intended expressly to be only for pedagogical purposes to aid the reader in understanding the principles of the invention and the concepts contributed by the inventor(s) to furthering the art, and are to be construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions. Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles, aspects, and embodiments of the invention, as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass equivalents thereof.
The functions of the various elements shown in the Figures, including any functional blocks labelled as ‘processors’, may be provided through the use of dedicated hardware as well as hardware capable of executing software in association with appropriate software. When provided by a processor, the functions may be provided by a single dedicated processor, by a single shared processor, or by a plurality of individual processors, some of which may be shared. Moreover, explicit use of the term ‘processor’ or ‘controller’ should not be construed to refer exclusively to hardware capable of executing software, and may implicitly include, without limitation, digital signal processor (DSP) hardware, network processor, application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), field programmable gate array (FPGA), read only memory (ROM) for storing software, random access memory (RAM), and non volatile storage. Other hardware, conventional and/or custom, may also be included. Similarly, any switches shown in the FIGS. are conceptual only. Their function may be carried out through the operation of program logic, through dedicated logic, through the interaction of program control and dedicated logic, or even manually, the particular technique being selectable by the implementer as more specifically understood from the context.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11290105.3 | Feb 2011 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2012/051646 | 2/1/2012 | WO | 00 | 8/22/2013 |
