Patent Grant
10509049
The present disclosure relates to a method of operating a laboratory sample distribution system, a laboratory sample distribution system and a laboratory automation system.
Known laboratory sample distribution systems are typically used in laboratory automation systems in order to distribute samples contained in sample containers between different laboratory stations. A typical laboratory sample distribution system can provide high throughput and reliable operation.
However, there is a need for a method of operating a laboratory sample distribution system that provides reliable, long term operation.
According to the present disclosure, a method of operating a laboratory sample distribution system is disclosed. The laboratory sample distribution system can comprise a number of sample container carriers. The sample container carriers can each comprise at least one magnetically active device and can be adapted to carry at least one sample container. The laboratory sample distribution system can also comprise a transport plane adapted to support the sample container carriers and a number of electro-magnetic actuators stationary arranged below the transport plane. The electro-magnetic actuators can be adapted to move a corresponding sample container carrier on top of the transport plane by applying a magnetic force to the sample container carrier. The method can comprise activating one of the number electro-magnetic actuators to apply a magnetic force to one of the number of sample container carriers in order to cause a movement of the one sample container carrier, detecting an electro-magnetic actuator calibration movement profile of the one sample container carrier, determining at least one electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter for the one electro-magnetic actuator in response to the electro-magnetic actuator calibration movement profile, and operating the one electro-magnetic actuator according to the at least one determined electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter, when the one electro-magnetic actuator is activated a next time.
Accordingly, it is a feature of the embodiments of the present disclosure to provide a method of operating a laboratory sample distribution system that provides for a reliable long term operation. Other features of the embodiments of the present disclosure will be apparent in light of the description of the disclosure embodied herein.
The following detailed description of specific embodiments of the present disclosure can be best understood when read in conjunction with the following drawings, where like structure is indicated with like reference numerals and in which:
In the following detailed description of the embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which are shown by way of illustration, and not by way of limitation, specific embodiments in which the disclosure may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical, mechanical and electrical changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
A method of operating a laboratory sample distribution system is disclosed. The laboratory sample distribution system can comprise a number of sample container carriers. Each sample container carrier can comprise at least one magnetically active device. Each sample container carrier can be adapted to carry at least one sample container. The laboratory sample distribution system can further comprise a transport plane adapted to support or carry the sample container carriers. The laboratory sample distribution system can further comprise a number of electro-magnetic actuators. The electro-magnetic actuators can be stationary arranged below the transport plane and can be adapted to move a corresponding sample container carrier on top of the transport plane by applying a magnetic force to the sample container carrier.
The method can comprise the step a) of activating one or more of the number of electro-magnetic actuators to apply or exert or cause a magnetic force to one of the number of sample container carriers in order to induce a movement of the one sample container carrier. The method can further comprise the step b) of detecting an electro-magnetic actuator calibration movement profile of the one sample container carrier. The method can further comprise the step c) of determining at least one electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter for the one electro-magnetic actuator in response to the electro-magnetic actuator calibration movement profile. The method can further comprise the step d) of operating the one electro-magnetic actuator according to the at least one determined electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter.
A magnetic field strength of the one electro-magnetic actuator may deviate from a reference magnetic field strength of a reference or “normal” electro-magnetic actuator or from an average magnetic field strength of the rest of electro-magnetic actuators, in particular a selection of electro-magnetic actuators. If the electrical resistance of the one electro-magnetic actuator differs from the electrical resistance of the reference electro-magnetic actuator, a current flow caused by a driving voltage through the one electro-magnetic actuator may deviate from a current flow caused by a similar driving voltage through the reference electro-magnetic actuator and hence the magnetic fields generated by the respective current flows may differ. Reasons for this may be for example assembly margins, wear or damage. Additionally, surface properties of a local area of the transport plane, wherein the one electro-magnetic actuator can be arranged below the local area, may deviate from reference or “normal” surface properties of a reference local area. Surface properties can be for example a surface roughness of the local area or material on the local area. Reasons for this may be for example assembly margins, wear, damage, environment and dirt like a spilt sample. A magnetic field strength deviation of the one electro-magnetic actuator and surface properties deviations of the local area may cause a deviation of the movement of the one sample container carrier compared to a reference or “normal” movement. This may render the laboratory sample distribution system itself unreliable or it may limit the maximum driving potential of the laboratory sample distribution system. Alternatively or additionally, it may help to distinguish components of the laboratory sample distribution system, that may be replaced soon e.g. due to abrasion.
By the method of operating the laboratory sample distribution system, it can be possible to compensate deviations regarding physical properties of components of the laboratory sample distribution system, i.e. a magnetic field strength deviation of the one electro-magnetic actuator and surface properties deviations of the local area, without using an external inspection probe adapted for measurements of the physical properties. Hence, the one sample container carrier may be moved on the local area by the one electro-magnetic actuator according to the optimum target movement. Thus, for example, irregularities in a ride of the one sample container carrier may be prevented, which could otherwise cause a disruption in the operation of the laboratory sample distribution system. Hence, a maximum reliability and uptime of the laboratory sample distribution system can be ensured. The method may be performed, or executed, at startup of the laboratory sample distribution system and/or at intervals e.g. once a day. A measurement of the named properties with the external inspection probe may in some cases even not be possible, because the laboratory sample distribution system may be covered and hence not easily accessible. Additionally, such an inspection may require shutting down the laboratory sample distribution system at least partially.
The sample containers can typically be designed as tubes made of glass or transparent plastic and typically can have an opening at an upper end. The sample containers can be used to contain, store and transport samples such as blood samples or chemical samples. The transport plane can also be denoted as transport surface. The transport plane can support the sample container carriers, what can also be denoted as carrying the sample container carriers. The electro-magnetic actuators can typically be solenoids surrounding ferromagnetic cores. These electro-magnetic actuators may be energized in order to provide a magnetic field that can be used to move or drive the sample container carriers. For that purpose, the at least one magnetically active device in each sample container carrier may be a permanent magnet. Alternatively or additionally, an electro-magnet and/or any magnetically soft material can be used. The sample container carriers can typically be adapted to move in two dimensions on the transport plane. For that purpose, the electro-magnetic actuators may be arranged in two dimensions below the transport plane. The electro-magnetic actuators may be arranged in a grid or matrix having rows and columns along which the electro-magnetic actuators can be arranged.
The one sample container carrier, to which the magnetic force is applied in step a), can be within an operating distance of the one electro-magnetic actuator of interest, in order to induce a movement of the one sample container carrier. Activating the one electro-magnetic actuator can mean that a magnetic field can be generated by the one electro-magnetic actuator. Activating may be done by supplying a driving voltage from an electric power supply to the solenoid surrounding the ferromagnetic core. The electro-magnetic actuator calibration movement profile of the one sample container carrier in step b) can be a position (x/y) or a speed and a direction of the one sample container carrier over time, detected in order to determine the at least one electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter for the one electro-magnetic actuator in step c). The position of the one sample container carrier may be detected by a plurality of sensors, e.g. Hall-sensors, of a control unit, the plurality of Hall-sensors arranged in a grid or matrix having rows and columns and each adapted to sense the presence of the at least one magnetically active device of the one sample container carrier. From the known position of the Hall-sensor, above which the one sample container carrier can be located, the position of the one sample container carrier may be deduced. Additionally or alternatively, the position of the one sample container carrier may be detected by a camera or another kind of sensor like an optical sensor of the control unit. Determining the at least one electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter for the one electro-magnetic actuator in response to the electro-magnetic actuator calibration movement profile of the one sample container carrier in step c) may comprise comparing the electro-magnetic actuator calibration movement profile to a reference electro-magnetic actuator calibration movement profile for the one sample container carrier, e.g. a movement profile of the one sample container carrier caused by a reference electro-magnetic actuator measured in the past at a manufacturer's site. According to the at least one determined electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter, the one electro-magnetic actuator can be operated in step d), when the one electro-magnetic actuator can be activated a next time, that can be in the following or consecutive activations, to apply a magnetic force to the one sample container carrier in order to induce a movement of the one sample container carrier. Hence, a magnetic field strength deviation of the one electro-magnetic actuator and surface properties deviations of the local area may be compensated.
The steps a) to d) can be performed or executed in the mentioned order. However, the determination of the at least one electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter may be done in real-time, while the one sample container carrier is still moving, e.g. while the one sample container carrier is attracted by the one electro-magnetic actuator. When the one sample container is above the one electro-magnetic actuator, the polarity of the magnetic field caused by the one electro-magnetic actuator may be reversed and for a magnitude of a reversed driving voltage the at least one electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter may be already considered.
The method may comprise the steps of storing the at least one electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter for the one electro-magnetic actuator in a software of the control unit of the laboratory sample distribution system after step c) and reading the at least one electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter before step d).
According to an embodiment, the steps a) to d) can be executed or repeated or performed for each of the number of electro-magnetic actuators. For example, the number of electro-magnetic actuators may differ from each other in their magnetic strength and a number of local areas of the transport plane may differ from each other in their surface properties. Each of the number of local areas can be allocated to a particular electro-magnetic actuator of the number of electro-magnetic actuators arranged below the respective local area. Differences between the magnetic field strength of the number of electro-magnetic actuators and differences between the surface properties of the number of local areas of the transport plane may be compensated, such that the one sample container carrier may be smoothly moved on the transport plane, no matter on which local area the one sample container carrier is located or positioned or moving.
According to an embodiment, the at least one electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter can comprise a first electric power supply parameter of the one electro-magnetic actuator. In step d), the one electro-magnetic actuator can be supplied with electric power according to the first electric power supply parameter. The first electric power supply parameter may comprise or be incorporated as a magnitude of the driving voltage used to supply the one electro-magnetic actuator with electric power. Additionally or alternatively, the first electric power supply parameter may comprise or be incorporated as a potentiometer ratio of an adjustable potentiometer interconnected in between the electro-magnetic actuator and the power supply.
According to an embodiment, the at least one electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter can comprise a first activating time duration parameter of the one electro-magnetic actuator and in step d), the one electro-magnetic actuator can be activated according to the first activating time duration parameter. The electric power supply may not have to be adjusted or may not be adjustable. In this case, a duration, during which the one electro-magnetic actuator can be activated, and hence the time duration, during which a magnetic force can be applied to the one sample container carrier, can be adjusted according to the first activating time duration parameter.
According to an embodiment, the method can comprise the step of disqualifying the one electro-magnetic actuator, if the at least one electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter exceeds a specified electro-magnetic actuator parameter threshold value and/or if a change of the at least one electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter between at least two consecutive executions or performances of the steps a) to c) exceeds a specified electro-magnetic actuator parameter change limit. The electro-magnetic actuator parameter threshold value may be an upper threshold value or a lower threshold value. Alternatively, an upper threshold value and a lower threshold value may define an electro-magnetic actuator parameter range. The one electro-magnetic actuator can be disqualified, if the at least one electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter is outside of the electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter range. A too high, too low or strongly changing electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter can be an indication of a problem with the one electro-magnetic actuator or the local area, e.g. the one electro-magnetic actuator or its electric power supply may be going defect or the local area may be polluted, e.g. by spilled liquid from a liquid sample. Hence, the problem may be detected before the operation of the laboratory sample distribution system gets interrupted by the problem.
According to an embodiment, the method can comprise the following steps during operating the one electro-magnetic actuator according to step d): e) detecting a sample container carrier calibration movement profile of one of the number of sample container carriers, f) determining at least one sample container carrier calibration parameter for the one sample container carrier in response to the sample container carrier calibration movement profile, and g) operating the one electro-magnetic actuator according to the at least one determined electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter and additionally to the at least one determined sample container carrier calibration parameter. The steps e) to f) can be performed or executed in the mentioned order. The sample container carrier calibration movement profile of the one sample container carrier in step e) can be a position or a speed and a direction of the one sample container carrier over time, detected in order to determine the at least one sample container carrier calibration parameter for the sample container carrier in step f).
Not only may the magnetic field strength of each of the number of electro-magnetic actuators and the surface properties of each of the number of local areas deviate from respective target values, also, the magnetic field strength of the at least one magnetically active device of each of the number of sample container carriers may deviate from a target magnetic field strength. Additionally, surface properties of a glide surface, with which each of the number of sample container carriers touches the transport plane, may deviate from target surface properties. After each of the number of electro-magnetic actuators at least one electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter has been determined, for example, by the use of a particular reference sample container carrier, the steps e) to f) may be performed for all other sample container carriers of the number of sample container carriers. The steps e) to f) may be performed for sample container carriers that do not carry sample containers at that time, whereby the sample container carriers can be in a defined state, because different sample containers may have different weights. In case the at least one magnetically active device is an electro-magnet, in step g) additionally or alternatively, the electro-magnet may be operated according to the at least one determined sample container carrier calibration parameter. Hence, the one sample container carrier may be moved on the local area by the one electro-magnetic actuator according to the optimum target movement. Some of the sample container carriers can be removed from the laboratory sample distribution system for an external inspection, but this can mean that they may not be available during the time of the inspection and hence the number of sample container carriers had to be increased to compensate the missing ones.
The method may comprise the steps of storing the at least one sample container carrier calibration parameter of each of the number of sample container carriers in the software of the control unit of the laboratory sample distribution system after step f) and reading the at least sample container carrier calibration parameter before step g). According to an embodiment, each of the number of sample container carriers can comprise a sample container carrier calibration parameter memory unit and the method can comprise the steps of storing the at least one sample container carrier calibration parameter of each of the number of sample container carriers on the corresponding sample container carrier calibration parameter memory unit and reading the at least one sample container carrier calibration parameter from the sample container carrier calibration parameter memory unit. These two steps may be performed after step f) and before step g). The sample container carrier calibration parameter memory unit may be a non-volatile memory device. Hence, it can be possible to take a particular sample container carrier out of the laboratory sample distribution system and to put it into another, similar laboratory sample distribution system without losing the at least one sample container carrier calibration parameter for the particular sample container carrier and not having to perform the steps e) to f) again. Advantageously, each of the number of sample container carriers can comprise a receiving and sending unit and the control unit can comprise a receiving and sending unit in order to store the at least one sample container carrier calibration parameters on the sample container carriers and to read them from the sample container carriers.
According to an embodiment, the at least one sample container carrier calibration parameter can comprise a second electric power supply parameter of the one electro-magnetic actuator and, in step g), the electro-magnetic actuator can be supplied with electric power according to the second electric power supply parameter.
According to an embodiment, the at least one sample container carrier calibration parameter can comprise a second activating time duration parameter of the one electro-magnetic actuator and, in step g), the electro-magnetic actuator can be supplied with electric power according to the second activating time duration parameter.
According to an embodiment, the method can comprise the step of disqualifying the one sample container carrier, if the at least one sample container carrier calibration parameter exceeds a specified sample container carrier parameter threshold value and/or if a change of the at least one sample container carrier calibration parameter between at least two consecutive executions or performances of the steps e) to f) exceeds a specified sample container carrier parameter change limit. The sample container carrier threshold value may be an upper threshold value or a lower threshold value. Alternatively, an upper threshold value and a lower threshold value may define a sample container carrier parameter range. The one sample container carrier can be disqualified, if the at least one sample container carrier calibration parameter is outside of the sample container carrier calibration parameter range. A too high, too low or strongly changing sample container carrier calibration parameter is an indication of a problem with the one sample container carrier, e.g. the at least one magnetically active device may be defect or on the glide surface a liquid sample may be spilt, polluting the glide surface. Hence, the problem may be detected, before the operation of the laboratory sample distribution system gets interrupted by the problem.
A laboratory sample distribution system adapted to perform the method as described above is presented. The laboratory sample distribution system can comprise a number of sample container carriers. The sample container carriers can each comprise at least one magnetically active device such as, for example, at least one permanent magnet, and adapted to carry at least one sample container. The laboratory sample distribution system can also comprise a transport plane adapted to support said sample container carriers and a number of electro-magnetic actuators stationary arranged below the transport plane. The electro-magnetic actuators can be adapted to move a corresponding sample container carrier on top of the transport plane by applying a magnetic force to the sample container carrier. The laboratory sample distribution system can also comprise a control unit. The control unit can be adapted to activate one of the number of electro-magnetic actuators to apply a magnetic force to one of the number of sample container carriers in order to cause a movement of the one sample container carrier, to detect an electro-magnetic actuator calibration movement profile of the one sample container carrier, to determine at least one electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter for the one electro-magnetic actuator in response to the electro-magnetic actuator calibration movement profile and to operate the one electro-magnetic actuator according to the at least one determined electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter. Additionally, during operating the one electro-magnetic actuator according to the at least one determined electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter, the control unit may be adapted to detect a sample container carrier calibration movement profile of one of the number of sample container carriers, to determine at least one sample container carrier calibration parameter for the one sample container carrier in response to the sample container carrier calibration movement profile and to operate the one electro-magnetic actuator according to the at least one determined sample container carrier calibration parameter. The control unit may further be adapted to disqualify the one electro-magnetic actuator and the one sample container carrier. Hence, the method can be automatically controlled by the control unit in a comfortable, fast and fail-safe manner. Additionally, the control unit can be capable of controlling several steps of several electro-magnetic actuators and several sample container carriers at a time.
In one embodiment, each of the number of sample container carriers can comprise a sample container carrier calibration parameter memory unit for the at least one sample container carrier calibration parameter. Advantageously, each of the number of sample container carriers can comprise a receiving and sending unit and the control unit can comprise a receiving and sending unit in order to store the at least one sample container carrier calibration parameters on the sample container carriers and to read them from the sample container carriers.
A laboratory automation system is also presented. The laboratory automation system can comprise a number of a pre-analytical, analytical and/or post-analytical laboratory stations and a laboratory sample distribution system as described above adapted to distribute the sample container carriers and/or sample containers between the laboratory stations.
The laboratory stations may be arranged adjacent to the laboratory sample distribution system. Pre-analytical stations may be adapted to perform any kind of pre-processing of samples, sample containers and/or sample container carriers. Analytical stations may be adapted to use a sample or part of the sample and a reagent to generate a measuring signal, the measuring signal indicating if and in which concentration, if any, an analyte exists. Post-analytical stations may be adapted to perform any kind of post-processing of samples, sample containers and/or sample container carriers. The pre-analytical, analytical and/or post-analytical stations may comprise at least one of a decapping station, a recapping station, an aliquot station, a centrifugation station, an archiving station, a pipetting station, a sorting station, a tube type identification station, a sample quality determining station, an add-on buffer station, a liquid level detection station, and a sealing/desealing station.
Referring initially to
The laboratory sample distribution system 100 can comprise a transport plane 110, under which a plurality of electro-magnetic actuators 120, 120′, 120″ can be positioned. The electro-magnetic actuators 120, 120′, 120″ can be implemented as solenoids having a solid ferromagnetic core 125. The electro-magnetic actuators 120, 120′, 120″ can be quadratically arranged in a grid or matrix having rows and columns. In each center of a quadrat formed by corresponding electro-magnetic actuators 120, 120′, 120″ no electro-magnetic actuator may be arranged. The transport plane can be divided in local areas 300. Under each local area 300, one of the electro-magnetic actuators 120, 120′, 120″ can be arranged, except for a selection of local areas 300, which can be arranged above the center of the quadrats formed by the corresponding electro-magnetic actuators 120, 120′, 120″.
Sample container carriers 140, 140′, 140″ can be positioned on the transport plane 110 and can be moved by the electro-magnetic actuators 120, 120′, 120″ on individual transport paths. While it can be understood that a plurality of sample container carriers 140, 140′, 140″ can be positioned on the transport plane 110, due to simplicity only three sample container carriers 140, 140′, 140″ are depicted in
The laboratory sample distribution system 100 can be adapted to distribute the sample container carriers 140, 140′, 140″ and/or the sample containers 145 between the laboratory stations 20. The laboratory stations 20 can be positioned adjacent to the transport plane 110 such that a sample container carrier 140, 140′, 140″ can be used to transport a sample contained in the sample container 145 to a respective laboratory station 20.
The laboratory sample distribution system 100 can further comprise a control unit 150. The control unit 150 can be configured to control movements of the sample container carriers 140, 140′, 140″ on the transport plane by activating and controlling the electro-magnetic actuators 120, 120′, 120″ such that the sample container carriers 140, 140′, 140″ independently and simultaneously can move along corresponding transport paths.
A plurality of Hall-sensors 130 can be arranged such that positions of respective sample container carriers 140, 140′, 140″ on the transport surface 110 can be detected.
Sample container carrier 140′ can be a reference sample container carrier. A reference electro-magnetic actuator calibration movement profile and a reference sample container carrier calibration movement profile has been determined for the reference sample container carrier 140′ caused by reference electro-magnetic actuators arranged below a reference transport plane measured in the past at a manufacturer's site.
In
The determined electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameters for the electro-magnetic actuators 120, 120′ arranged below the left part of the transport plane 110 can be stored in a non-volatile storage of the control unit 150. When the electro-magnetic actuators 120, 120′ are activated a next time, the electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameters can be read and the electro-magnetic actuators 120, 120′ can be operated accordingly. This action can correspond to step d) in
For example, the magnetic field of the electro-magnetic actuator 120′ next to the reference sample container carrier 140′ may be lower than a target magnetic field of the reference electro-magnetic actuators, and hence the reference sample container carrier 140′ can be attracted by a magnetic force smaller than a reference magnetic force. Hence, the reference sample container carrier 140′ may arrive later in time above the electro-magnetic actuator 120′ than scheduled for a strong enough magnetic field of the electro-magnetic actuator 120′. From the deviation in time, the electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter can be deduced. In this case, the electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameter can comprise a first electric power supply parameter. The electro-magnetic actuator 120′ in
If a value of one of the determined electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameters for the electro-magnetic actuators 120, 120′ arranged below the left part of the transport plane 110 exceeds a specified electro-magnetic actuator parameter threshold value, e.g. the value two, the corresponding electro-magnetic actuator 120, 120′ can be disqualified. This step can be optional as indicated by a dashed arrow in
For the electro-magnetic actuators 120, 120″ arranged below the middle part and right part of the transport plane 110, electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameters have already been determined. However, for the sample container carrier 140″ positioned in the middle part of the transport plane 110 no sample container carrier calibration parameter has been determined until then. The sample container carrier 140″ can be successively attracted by the electro-magnetic actuators 120, 120″ arranged below the middle part of the transport plane 110 and hence moved downwards in
The determined sample container carrier calibration parameter for the sample container carrier 140″ can be wireless transferred from the control unit 150 to a receiving, sending and sample container carrier calibration parameter memory unit 250 of the sample container carrier 140″. Each of the sample container carriers 140, 140′, 140″ can be individually addressable. Before the sample container carrier 140″ is moved a next time, the sample container carrier calibration parameter can be read from the sample container carrier 140″ and the electro-magnetic actuators 120, 120′, 120″ can be operated accordingly. This action can correspond to step g) in
For example, the magnetic field of the permanent magnet of the sample container carrier 140″ may be lower than a target magnetic field of the sample container carrier 140′, and hence the sample container carrier 140″ can be attracted by a magnetic force smaller than a target magnetic force. Hence, the sample container carrier 140″ can arrive later in time above the electro-magnetic actuator 120″ than scheduled for a strong enough magnetic field of the permanent magnet of the sample container carrier 140″. From the deviation in time, the sample container carrier calibration parameter can be deduced. In this case, the sample container carrier calibration parameter can comprise a second electric power supply parameter, which can have the value one for no time deviation, but can have a value larger than one because of the late arrival. When the electro-magnetic actuator 120″ is activated a next time to attract the sample container carrier 140″, the sample container carrier calibration parameter can be read and the electro-magnetic actuators 120″ can be supplied with electric energy with the magnitude of the last time multiplied by the second electric power supply parameter, i.e. the default driving voltage multiplied by the first electric power supply parameter and the second electric power supply parameter.
If the determined sample container carrier calibration parameter for the sample container carrier 140″ exceeds a specified sample container carrier parameter threshold value, e.g. two, the sample container carrier 140″ can be disqualified. This action can be optional as indicated by a dashed arrow in
For the sample container carrier 140 on the right part of the transport plane 110, a sample container carrier calibration parameter has already been determined. The electro-magnetic actuators 120 arranged below the right part of the transport plane 110 can be operated in accordance with the sample container carrier calibration parameter of the sample container carrier 140 and their electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameters.
Hence, a respective electro-magnetic actuator 120, 120′, 120″ can be operated according to its first electric power supply parameter and the second electric power supply parameter of the corresponding sample container carrier 140, 140′, 140″, i.e. the electro-magnetic actuator 120, 120′, 120″ can be driven with the default driving voltage multiplied by the first electric power supply parameter and the second electric power supply parameter, when the electro-magnetic actuator 120, 120′, 120″ is activated.
Additionally or alternatively, it can be possible to compensate deviations regarding physical properties of the components of the laboratory sample distribution system 100 in other ways. For example, the electro-magnetic actuator calibration parameters of the electro-magnetic actuators 120, 120′, 120″ may comprise first activating time duration parameters and the sample container carrier calibration parameters of the sample container carriers 140, 140′, 140″ may comprise second activating time duration parameters. Hence a respective electro-magnetic actuator 120, 120′, 120″ can be operated according to its first activating time duration parameter and the second activating time duration parameter of the corresponding sample container carrier 140, 140′, 140″, i.e. the electro-magnetic actuator 120, 120′, 120″ can be driven with the default driving voltage for a default time duration multiplied by the first activating time duration parameter and the second activating time duration parameter.
It is noted that terms like “preferably,” “commonly,” and “typically” are not utilized herein to limit the scope of the claimed embodiments or to imply that certain features are critical, essential, or even important to the structure or function of the claimed embodiments. Rather, these terms are merely intended to highlight alternative or additional features that may or may not be utilized in a particular embodiment of the present disclosure.
Having described the present disclosure in detail and by reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent that modifications and variations are possible without departing from the scope of the disclosure defined in the appended claims. More specifically, although some aspects of the present disclosure are identified herein as preferred or particularly advantageous, it is contemplated that the present disclosure is not necessarily limited to these preferred aspects of the disclosure.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14184818 | Sep 2014 | EP | regional |
This application is a continuation of PCT/EP2015/071041, filed Sep. 15, 2015, which is based on and claims priority to EP 14184818.4, filed Sep. 15, 2014, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3273727 | Rogers et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
| 3653485 | Donlon | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3901656 | Durkos et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
| 4150666 | Brush | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4395164 | Beltrop et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4544068 | Cohen | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4771237 | Daley | Sep 1988 | A |
| 5120506 | Saito et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5295570 | Grecksch et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5309049 | Kawada et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5457368 | Jacobsen et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5523131 | Isaacs et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5530345 | Murari et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5636548 | Dunn et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5641054 | Mori et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5651941 | Stark et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5720377 | Lapeus et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5735387 | Polaniec et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5788929 | Nesti | Aug 1998 | A |
| 6045319 | Uchida et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6062398 | Thalmayr | May 2000 | A |
| 6141602 | Igarashi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6151535 | Ehlers | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6184596 | Ohzeki | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6191507 | Peltier et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6206176 | Blonigan et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6255614 | Yamakawa et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6260360 | Wheeler | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6279728 | Jung et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6293750 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6429016 | McNeil | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6444171 | Sakazume et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6571934 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 7028831 | Veiner | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7078082 | Adams | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7122158 | Itoh | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7278532 | Martin | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7326565 | Yokoi et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7425305 | Itoh | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7428957 | Schaefer | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7578383 | Itoh | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7597187 | Bausenwein et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7850914 | Veiner et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7858033 | Itoh | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7875254 | Garton et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7939484 | Loeffler et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
| 8240460 | Bleau et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
| 8281888 | Bergmann | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8502422 | Lykkegaard | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8796186 | Shirazi | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8833544 | Stoeckle et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8973736 | Johns et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9097691 | Onizawa et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9211543 | Ohga et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9423410 | Buehr | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9423411 | Riether | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9567167 | Sinz | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9575086 | Heise et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9593970 | Sinz | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9618525 | Malinowski et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9658241 | Riether et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 20020009391 | Marquiss et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020028158 | Wardlaw | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20030092185 | Qureshi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20040050836 | Nesbitt et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040084531 | Itoh | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20050061622 | Martin | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050109580 | Thompson | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050194333 | Veiner et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050196320 | Veiner et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050226770 | Allen et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050242963 | Oldham et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050247790 | Itoh | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050260101 | Nauck et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050271555 | Itoh | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060000296 | Salter | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047303 | Ortiz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060219524 | Kelly et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070116611 | DeMarco | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070210090 | Sixt et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070248496 | Bondioli et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276558 | Kim | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080012511 | Ono | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080029368 | Komori | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080056328 | Rund et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080131961 | Crees et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20090004732 | LaBarre et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090022625 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090081771 | Breidford et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090128139 | Drenth et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090142844 | Le Comte | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090180931 | Silbert et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090322486 | Gerstel | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100000250 | Sixt | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100152895 | Dai | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100175943 | Bergmann | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100186618 | King et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100255529 | Cocola et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100300831 | Pedrazzini | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100312379 | Pedrazzini | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110050213 | Furukawa | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110124038 | Bishop et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110172128 | Davies et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110186406 | Kraus et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110287447 | Norderhaug et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120037696 | Lavi | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120129673 | Fukugaki et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120178170 | Van Praet | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120211645 | Tullo et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120275885 | Furrer et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120282683 | Mototsu | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120295358 | Ariff et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120310401 | Shah | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130034410 | Heise et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130153677 | Leen et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130180824 | Kleinikkink et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130263622 | Mullen et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130322992 | Pedrazzini | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140170023 | Saito et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140234065 | Heise et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140234949 | Wasson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140234978 | Heise et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20150014125 | Hecht | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150166265 | Pollack et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150241457 | Miller | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150273468 | Croquette et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150273691 | Pollack | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150276775 | Mellars et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150276776 | Riether | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150276777 | Riether et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150276778 | Riether et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150276782 | Riether | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160003859 | Wenczel et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160025756 | Pollack et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160054341 | Edelmann | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160077120 | Riether | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160229565 | Margner | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160274137 | Baer | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160282378 | Malinowski et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160341750 | Sinz et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160341751 | Huber et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170059599 | Riether | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170096307 | Mahmudimanesh et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170097372 | Heise et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170101277 | Malinowski | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170108522 | Baer | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170131307 | Pedain | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170131309 | Pedain | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170131310 | Volz et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170138971 | Heise et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170160299 | Schneider et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170168079 | Sinz | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170174448 | Sinz | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170184622 | Sinz et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170248623 | Kaeppeli et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170248624 | Kaeppeli et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170363608 | Sinz | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180067141 | Mahmudimanesh et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180074087 | Heise et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180106821 | Vollenweider et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180128848 | Schneider et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180156835 | Hassan | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180188280 | Malinowski | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180210000 | van Mierlo | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180210001 | Reza | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180217174 | Malinowski | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180217176 | Sinz et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180224476 | Birrer et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180348244 | Ren | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180348245 | Schneider et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190018027 | Hoehnel | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190076845 | Huber et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190076846 | Durco et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190086433 | Hermann et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190094251 | Malinowski | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190094252 | Waser et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190101468 | Haldar | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 201045617 | Apr 2008 | CN |
| 102109530 | Jun 2011 | CN |
| 3909786 | Sep 1990 | DE |
| 10200505012 | Apr 2007 | DE |
| 102005051012 | Apr 2007 | DE |
| 102012000665 | Aug 2012 | DE |
| 102011090044 | Jul 2013 | DE |
| 0601213 | Oct 1992 | EP |
| 0775650 | May 1997 | EP |
| 0916406 | May 1999 | EP |
| 1122194 | Aug 2001 | EP |
| 1524525 | Apr 2005 | EP |
| 2119643 | Nov 2009 | EP |
| 2148117 | Jan 2010 | EP |
| 2327646 | Jun 2011 | EP |
| 2447701 | May 2012 | EP |
| 2500871 | Sep 2012 | EP |
| 2589966 | May 2013 | EP |
| 2589966 | May 2013 | EP |
| 2502675 | Feb 2014 | EP |
| 2887071 | Jun 2015 | EP |
| 2165515 | Apr 1986 | GB |
| S56-147209 | Nov 1981 | JP |
| 60-223481 | Nov 1985 | JP |
| 61-081323 | Apr 1986 | JP |
| S61-069604 | Apr 1986 | JP |
| S61-094925 | May 1986 | JP |
| S61-174031 | Aug 1986 | JP |
| S61-217434 | Sep 1986 | JP |
| S62-100161 | May 1987 | JP |
| S63-31918 | Feb 1988 | JP |
| S63-48169 | Feb 1988 | JP |
| S63-82433 | May 1988 | JP |
| S63-290101 | Nov 1988 | JP |
| 1148966 | Jun 1989 | JP |
| H01-266860 | Oct 1989 | JP |
| H02-87903 | Mar 1990 | JP |
| 03-112393 | May 1991 | JP |
| 03-192013 | Aug 1991 | JP |
| H03-38704 | Aug 1991 | JP |
| H04-127063 | Apr 1992 | JP |
| H05-69350 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| H05-142232 | Jun 1993 | JP |
| H05-180847 | Jul 1993 | JP |
| 06-26808 | Feb 1994 | JP |
| H06-148198 | May 1994 | JP |
| 06-156730 | Jun 1994 | JP |
| 06-211306 | Aug 1994 | JP |
| 07-228345 | Aug 1995 | JP |
| 07-236838 | Sep 1995 | JP |
| H07-301637 | Nov 1995 | JP |
| H09-17848 | Jan 1997 | JP |
| H11-083865 | Mar 1999 | JP |
| H11-264828 | Sep 1999 | JP |
| H11-304812 | Nov 1999 | JP |
| H11-326336 | Nov 1999 | JP |
| 2000-105243 | Apr 2000 | JP |
| 2000-105246 | Apr 2000 | JP |
| 2001-124786 | May 2001 | JP |
| 2001-240245 | Sep 2001 | JP |
| 2005-001055 | Jan 2005 | JP |
| 2005-249740 | Sep 2005 | JP |
| 2006-106008 | Apr 2006 | JP |
| 2007-309675 | Nov 2007 | JP |
| 2007-314262 | Dec 2007 | JP |
| 2007-322289 | Dec 2007 | JP |
| 2009-036643 | Feb 2009 | JP |
| 2009-062188 | Mar 2009 | JP |
| 2009-145188 | Jul 2009 | JP |
| 2009-300402 | Dec 2009 | JP |
| 2010-243310 | Oct 2010 | JP |
| 2010-271204 | Dec 2010 | JP |
| 2013-172009 | Feb 2013 | JP |
| 2013-190400 | Sep 2013 | JP |
| 685591 | Sep 1979 | SU |
| 1996036437 | Nov 1996 | WO |
| 2003042048 | May 2003 | WO |
| 2007024540 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2008133708 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| 2009002358 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| 2010042722 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| 2012170636 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| 2010087303 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| 2010129715 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| 2012158520 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012158541 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2013152089 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| 2013169778 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2013177163 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2014059134 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| 2014071214 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2015104263 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report dated Jan. 12, 2016, in Application No. PCT/EP2015/071041, 4 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170184622 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/EP2015/071041 | Sep 2015 | US |
| Child | 15455773 | US |
