The present disclosure relates to a method of operating a laboratory sample distribution system, a laboratory sample distribution system and a laboratory automation system.
Laboratory sample distribution systems are used in laboratory automation systems comprising a number of laboratory stations, for example pre-analytical, analytical and/or post-analytical stations. The laboratory sample distribution system can be used in order to distribute sample containers between the laboratory stations and other equipment. The sample containers are typically made of transparent plastic material or glass material and have an opening at an upper side. The sample containers can contain samples such as blood samples or other medical samples.
A typical laboratory sample distribution system can move sample container carriers on a transport plane. A number of electro-magnetic actuators are arranged below the transport plane in order to drive the sample container carriers.
However, there is a need for a method of operating a laboratory sample distribution system, a laboratory sample distribution system and a laboratory automation system having a high distribution performance at reduced transport space required.
According to the present disclosure, a method of operating a laboratory sample distribution system is presented. The laboratory sample distribution system can comprise a number of sample container carriers. The sample container carriers can be adapted to carry one or more sample containers. The sample containers can comprise samples to be analyzed by a number of laboratory stations. The laboratory sample distribution system can also comprise a transport plane. The transport plane can be adapted to support the sample container carriers. The method can comprise allocating an area of the transport plane as a buffer area. The buffer area can be adapted to store a variable number of sample container carriers. The method can also comprise controlling the buffer area using a puzzle-based control scheme or using an aisle-based control scheme as a function of a storage density of the buffer area.
Accordingly, it is a feature of the embodiments of the present disclosure to provide a method of operating a laboratory sample distribution system, a laboratory sample distribution system and a laboratory automation system having a high distribution performance at reduced transport space required. Other features of the embodiments of the present disclosure will be apparent in light of the description of the disclosure embodied herein.
The following detailed description of specific embodiments of the present disclosure can be best understood when read in conjunction with the following drawings, where like structure is indicated with like reference numerals and in which:
In the following detailed description of the embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which are shown by way of illustration, and not by way of limitation, specific embodiments in which the disclosure may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical, mechanical and electrical changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
The presented method can be configured to operate a laboratory sample distribution system. The laboratory sample distribution system can comprise a number of sample container carriers. The sample container carriers can be adapted to carry one or more sample containers. The sample containers may comprise samples, e.g. to be analyzed by a number of laboratory stations.
The laboratory sample distribution system further comprises a transport plane, wherein the transport plane is adapted to support or carry the sample container carriers. In other words, the sample container carriers may simply be placed on the transport plane.
According to the operating method, a buffer area can be logically allocated on the transport plane. The allocating may comprise defining a size of the buffer area, and/or defining a location of the buffer area on the transport plane and/or defining a shape or outline of the buffer area. The buffer area can be adapted to store a variable number (e.g., 2 to 500) of sample container carriers. The buffer area can be adapted to buffer sample container carriers, e.g. if the sample container carriers are waiting for further movement over the transport plane and/or if a sample comprised in the sample container carrier can wait for further processing. Further, the buffer area may buffer empty sample container carriers.
According to the operating method, the buffer area can be controlled using a centralized control scheme which can be puzzle-based, or aisle-based, depending on a storage density of the buffer area.
The storage density may be defined as the number of sample container carriers being buffered inside the buffer area related to the maximum number of sample container carriers which can be buffered inside the buffer area. The storage density may be calculated as follows:
d=n/m,
wherein d denotes the storage density, n denotes the number of sample container carriers being buffered inside the buffer area, and m denotes the maximum number of sample container carriers which can be buffered inside the buffer area.
The function principles of puzzle-based control schemes and aisle-based control schemes are explained in detail in the publication: Gue K R, Kim B S (2007) Puzzle-based storage systems. Naval Res. Logist. 54(5):556-567, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference regarding the function principles of puzzle-based control schemes and aisle-based control schemes.
The buffer area can be operated in a hybrid mode alternating between the puzzle-based control scheme and the aisle-based control scheme. If the storage density is low, the aisle-based control scheme may be used, thus optimizing a retrieval time of buffered sample container carriers. If the storage density is high, the puzzle-based control scheme may be used, thus optimizing the storage density of the buffered sample container carriers.
The selected control scheme can depend on the present storage density. Self-evidently, the control scheme may be selected as a function of further parameters, e.g., the total capacity of the buffer area, the shape of the buffer area, the time of day, and the like.
The puzzle-based control scheme can typically be used if the storage density is equal to or larger than an upper threshold. The aisle-based control scheme can typically be used if the storage density is equal to or smaller than a lower threshold. The upper threshold and the lower threshold may be different or may be identical. The upper threshold may denote a condition or storage density, when only a single field is free in the buffer area, i.e. the number of buffered sample container carriers is equal to the maximum number of sample container carriers which can be buffered in the buffer area minus 1. The lower threshold may denote a condition or storage density, when each sample container carrier being buffered can exit the buffer area by a corresponding aisle without the need to remove any furthers sample container carriers. For example, the upper threshold may have a value of about 0.9=90 percent (%), and in one embodiment about 0.99=99%. The lower threshold may have a value of about 0.67=67%, and in embodiment about 0.5=50%.
The buffer area may be controlled using a transition control scheme if the control scheme is switched from the aisle-based control scheme to the puzzle-based control scheme and/or switched from the puzzle-based control scheme to the aisle-based control scheme. During the transition control scheme functional principles between puzzle-based and aisle-based may be mixed. The transition control scheme may be used if the storage density lies between the lower threshold and the upper threshold.
If the storage density is equal to or smaller than the lower threshold, the aisle-based control scheme may be used, and in embodiment, operating with static or fixed aisles. If the storage density is above the lower threshold, the transition control scheme may be used, and in embodiment still being aisle-based but using block movement in order to form dynamic aisles on the buffer area. If there are many more sample container carriers to be buffered, exceeding the remaining space for aisles, the control may switch to a high density-algorithm that is puzzle-based. Thus, the density of sample container carriers on the buffer area may lead to three stages, each stage having its own control scheme or routing algorithm, respectively, and storage area design.
The sample container carriers may comprise at least one magnetically active device such as for example, at least one permanent magnet.
The laboratory sample distribution system may comprise a number of electro-magnetic actuators being stationary arranged in rows and columns (forming a grid having fields) below the transport plane. The electro-magnetic actuators may be adapted to apply a magnetic force to the container carriers such that the sample container carriers can move exclusively along the rows or along the columns. The electromagnetic actuators located inside the buffer area may be activated based on the puzzle-based control scheme or the aisle-based control scheme as a function of the storage density of the buffer area.
The buffer area may have a defined number, e.g. 1 to 100, of transfer locations. The sample container carriers can be transferred to/from the buffer area exclusively using/over the transfer locations. In one embodiment, the buffer area may have only one transfer location. The sample container carriers can be transferred to/from the buffer area exclusively using/over the only one transfer location. In one embodiment, the buffer area may have a defined number of transfer locations, which can serve only as an input into the buffer area, and the buffer area may have a defined number of transfer locations, which can serve only as an output out of the buffer area. The number of transfer locations and/or their location or position in the buffer area may be dynamically changed as a function of the number of sample container carriers to be buffered and/or as a function of the storage density.
Formulas for determining the transition point between the aisled-based control scheme and the transition control scheme or the lower threshold, respectively, are presented in the following. Thereby, it can be assumed that the buffer area is of size z times (*) z with z being a natural number equal to or larger than 3, e.g. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 etc., and the buffer area having exactly one transfer location placed in a corner. If z is divisible by 3, then the point of transition is when the number of sample container carriers is more than (2 (z2−z)/3)+1. If the remainder of z mod 3 is 2 (“modulo operation”), then the point of transition is when the number of sample container carriers is over ((2 z−1)*(z−1)/3)+1. If the remainder of z mod 3 is 1, then the point of transition is when the number of sample container carriers is over (2 (z−1)2/3)+1.
During the transition control scheme, the buffer area may be logically segmented into sub buffer areas. Each sub buffer area can have a respective sub transfer location. The sub buffer areas can be controlled individually and independent from one another using a puzzle-based control scheme. The respective sub transfer locations may each have a free connection or path to the transfer location.
During the aisle-based control scheme, the buffer area may have at least one one-way aisle. The sample container carriers can move or can be moved in a single direction or in only one direction in the one-way aisle. The one-way aisle may also be denoted as one-way passage way. In one embodiment, all aisles may be one-way aisles. Hence, when a first sample container carrier exits the buffer area and is retrieved from it and a second sample container carrier, which is different from the first sample container carrier, enters the buffer area and is stored within or inside it at the same time or simultaneously, the first and the second sample container carriers may not block each other. In other words, a deadlock in the buffer area, in particular at a transfer location if present, may be avoided.
The method comprising controlling the buffer area using the aisle-based control scheme may be independent of controlling the buffer area using the puzzle-based control scheme and/or the transition control scheme as a function of the storage density of the buffer area. The buffer area can have at least one one-way aisle. The sample container carriers can move in a single direction in the one-way aisle. In particular this may mean that the buffer area may be controlled using only the aisle-based control scheme and/or that the buffer area may not be operated in a hybrid mode.
The buffer area may have a rectangular shape. If the buffer has one or more transfer locations, the transfer location may be located, in particular statically, in a corner or in the middle of a long side of the rectangle.
A size of the buffer area, and/or a shape of the buffer area, and/or a structure of the buffer area may be dynamically changed as a function of the number of sample container carriers to be buffered and/or as a function of the storage density.
The laboratory sample distribution system can comprise a number (e.g. 2 to 2000) of sample container carriers. The sample container carriers can be adapted to carry one or more sample containers. The sample containers can comprise samples to be analyzed by a number of laboratory stations.
The laboratory sample distribution system can further comprise a transport plane. The transport plane can be adapted to support the sample container carriers such that the sample container carriers may propagate over the transport plane.
The laboratory sample distribution system can further comprise a control device, e.g. a Personal Computer (PC) controlling the remaining components, adapted to perform the above method.
The sample container carriers may respectively comprise at least one magnetically active device such as, for example at least one permanent magnet. The laboratory sample distribution system may comprise a number (e.g. 2 to 2000) of electro-magnetic actuators being stationary arranged in rows and columns below the transport plane. The electro-magnetic actuators can be adapted to apply a magnetic force to the container carriers such that the sample container carriers can move exclusively along the rows or along the columns. The control device may be adapted to control the electromagnetic actuators located inside the buffer area based on the puzzle-based control scheme, or the aisle-based control scheme, as a function of the storage density of the buffer area.
The laboratory automation system can comprise a number of laboratory stations and a laboratory sample distribution system as described above. The laboratory sample distribution system can be adapted to distribute the sample container carriers between the laboratory stations. The stations may be pre-analytical and/or analytical and/or post-analytical stations of a laboratory automation system.
A pre-analytical station can usually serve for the pre-processing of samples or sample containers.
An analytical station may be designed for example for using a sample or part of the sample and a reagent to generate a measurable signal, on the basis of which it can be determined whether the analyte is present, and if so in what concentration.
A post-analytical station can usually serve for the post-processing of samples or sample containers.
The pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical stations may, for example, have at least one station from the group of following stations: a cap-removing station for removing caps or closures on sample tubes, a cap-applying station for applying caps or closures to sample tubes, an aliquoting station for aliquoting samples, a centrifuging station for centrifuging samples, an archiving station for archiving samples, a pipetting station for pipetting, a sorting station for sorting samples or sample tubes, a sample-tube-type determining station for determining a type of sample tube and a sample-quality determining station for determining the quality of a sample.
Referring initially to
The laboratory automation system 10 can further comprise a laboratory sample distribution system 100 adapted to distribute sample container carriers 140 between the laboratory stations 20. As an example, only a single sample container carrier 140 is depicted. Self-evidently, the laboratory automation system 10 can typically comprise a large number of sample container carriers 140, e.g. 100 to several thousand of sample container carriers 140.
The sample container carriers 140 can be adapted to carry one or more sample containers 145. The sample containers 145 can comprise samples to be analyzed by the laboratory stations 20. The sample container carriers 140 can comprise a magnetically active device 147 in form of a single permanent magnet.
The laboratory sample distribution system 100 can comprise a transport plane 110. The transport plane 110 can be adapted to support the sample container carriers 140, such that the sample container carriers 140 can move over the transport plane 110.
The laboratory sample distribution system 100 can comprise a number of electro-magnetic actuators 120, each having a ferromagnetic core 125 being stationary arranged in rows and columns below the transport plane 110. The electro-magnetic actuators 120 can be adapted to apply a magnetic force to the sample container carriers 140, such that the sample container carriers can move along the rows or along the columns. The rows and columns can form logical fields, as depicted in
The laboratory sample distribution system 100 can further comprise a control device 150 adapted to centrally control the operation of the sample distribution system 100. For example, the control device 150 can control the complete set of electro-magnetic actuators 120, such that desired magnetic drive forces can be applied to the sample container carriers 140, such that the sample container carriers 140 can move simultaneously and independent from one another along desired transport paths.
The laboratory sample distribution system 100 can be operated by the control device 150 as follows.
An area of the transport plane 110 can be logically allocated as a buffer area 160. The buffer area 160 can be adapted to store a variable number of sample container carriers 140. The control device 150 can control the buffer area 160 using a puzzle-based control scheme or using an aisle-based control scheme as a function of a storage density of the buffer area 160.
The control device 150 can control sample container carriers 140 not being buffered in the buffer area 160 independent from the sample container carriers 140 being buffered in the buffer area 160. A control algorithm used for sample container carriers 140 not being buffered in the buffer area 160 can differ from a control algorithm used inside the buffer area 160. The controlling of/in the buffer area 160 can now be described in detail with reference to
Now referring to
The storage density in
In
Here, n is 26 and m is 36, making d=72%. If the second column from the left were not filled in
Now referring to
When the first sample container carrier at the top right in
The embodiment of the method shown in
It is noted that terms like “preferably,” “commonly,” and “typically” are not utilized herein to limit the scope of the claimed embodiments or to imply that certain features are critical, essential, or even important to the structure or function of the claimed embodiments. Rather, these terms are merely intended to highlight alternative or additional features that may or may not be utilized in a particular embodiment of the present disclosure.
Having described the present disclosure in detail and by reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent that modifications and variations are possible without departing from the scope of the disclosure defined in the appended claims. More specifically, although some aspects of the present disclosure are identified herein as preferred or particularly advantageous, it is contemplated that the present disclosure is not necessarily limited to these preferred aspects of the disclosure.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
15168783 | May 2015 | EP | regional |
This application is a continuation of PCT/EP2016/061310, filed May 19, 2016, which is based on and claims priority to EP 15168783.7, filed May 22, 2015, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3273727 | Rogers et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
3653485 | Donlon | Apr 1972 | A |
3901656 | Durkos et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
4150666 | Brush | Apr 1979 | A |
4395164 | Beltrop et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4544068 | Cohen | Oct 1985 | A |
4771237 | Daley | Sep 1988 | A |
5120506 | Saito et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5295570 | Grecksch et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5309049 | Kawada et al. | May 1994 | A |
5457368 | Jacobsen et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5523131 | Isaacs et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530345 | Murari et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5636548 | Dunn et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5641054 | Mori et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5651941 | Stark et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5720377 | Lapeus et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5735387 | Polaniec et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5788929 | Nesti | Aug 1998 | A |
6045319 | Uchida et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6062398 | Thalmayr | May 2000 | A |
6141602 | Igarashi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151535 | Ehlers | Nov 2000 | A |
6184596 | Ohzeki | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191507 | Peltier et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206176 | Blonigan et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6255614 | Yamakawa et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260360 | Wheeler | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279728 | Jung et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293750 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6429016 | McNeil | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6444171 | Sakazume et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6571934 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
7028831 | Veiner | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7078082 | Adams | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7122158 | Itoh | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7278532 | Martin | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7326565 | Yokoi et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7425305 | Itoh | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7428957 | Schaefer | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7578383 | Itoh | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7597187 | Bausenwein et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7850914 | Veiner et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7858033 | Itoh | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7875254 | Garton et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7939484 | Loeffler et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
8240460 | Bleau et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8281888 | Bergmann | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8502422 | Lykkegaard | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8796186 | Shirazi | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8833544 | Stoeckle et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8973736 | Johns et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9056720 | Van De Loecht et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9097691 | Onizawa et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9187268 | Denninger et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9211543 | Ohga et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9239335 | Heise et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9423410 | Buehr | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9423411 | Riether | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9567167 | Sinz | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9575086 | Heise et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9593970 | Sinz | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9598243 | Denninger et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9618525 | Malinowski et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9658241 | Riether et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9664703 | Heise et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9772342 | Riether | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9791468 | Riether et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9810706 | Riether et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10126317 | Heise et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10197586 | Sinz et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10288634 | Kaeppeli | May 2019 | B2 |
10352953 | Huber et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10416183 | Hassan | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10495657 | Malinowski | Dec 2019 | B2 |
20020009391 | Marquiss et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020028158 | Wardlaw | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20040050836 | Nesbitt et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040084531 | Itoh | May 2004 | A1 |
20050061622 | Martin | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050109580 | Thompson | May 2005 | A1 |
20050194333 | Veiner et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050196320 | Veiner et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050226770 | Allen et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050242963 | Oldham et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050247790 | Itoh | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050260101 | Nauck et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271555 | Itoh | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000296 | Salter | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060047303 | Ortiz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060219524 | Kelly et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070116611 | DeMarco | May 2007 | A1 |
20070210090 | Sixt et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070248496 | Bondioli et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070276558 | Kim | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080012511 | Ono | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080029368 | Komori | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080056328 | Rund et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080131961 | Crees et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090004732 | LaBarre et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090022625 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090081771 | Breidford et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090128139 | Drenth et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090142844 | Le Comte | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090180931 | Silbert et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090322486 | Gerstel | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100000250 | Sixt | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100152895 | Dai | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100175943 | Bergmann | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100186618 | King et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100255529 | Cocola et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100300831 | Pedrazzini | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312379 | Pedrazzini | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110050213 | Furukawa | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110124038 | Bishop et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110172128 | Davies et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110186406 | Kraus et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110287447 | Norderhaug et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120037696 | Lavi | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120129673 | Fukugaki et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120178170 | Van Praet | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120211645 | Tullo et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120275885 | Furrer et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120282683 | Mototsu | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120295358 | Ariff et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120310401 | Shah | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130034410 | Heise et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130153677 | Leen et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130180824 | Kleinikkink et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130263622 | Mullen et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130322992 | Pedrazzini | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140170023 | Saito et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140231217 | Denninger | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140234949 | Wasson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150014125 | Hecht | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150140668 | Mellars et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150166265 | Pollack et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150241457 | Miller | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150273468 | Croquette et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150273691 | Pollack | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150276775 | Mellars et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150276782 | Riether | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160003859 | Wenczel et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160025756 | Pollack et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160054341 | Edelmann | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160077120 | Riether | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160229565 | Margner | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160274137 | Baer | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160282378 | Malinowski et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160341750 | Sinz et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160341751 | Huber et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170059599 | Riether | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170096307 | Mahmudimanesh et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170097372 | Heise et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170101277 | Malinowski | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170108522 | Baer | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170131307 | Pedain | May 2017 | A1 |
20170131309 | Pedain | May 2017 | A1 |
20170131310 | Volz et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170138971 | Heise et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170160299 | Schneider et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170168079 | Sinz | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170174448 | Sinz | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170184622 | Sinz et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170248623 | Kaeppeli et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170248624 | Kaeppeli et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170363608 | Sinz | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180106821 | Vollenweider et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180128848 | Schneider et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180188280 | Malinowski | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180210000 | van Mierlo | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180210001 | Reza | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180224476 | Birrer et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180340951 | Kaeppell | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180340952 | Kaeppeli et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180348244 | Ren | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180348245 | Schneider et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190018027 | Hoehnel | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190076845 | Huber et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190076846 | Durco et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190086433 | Hermann et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190094251 | Malinowski | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190094252 | Waser et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190101468 | Haldar | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190285660 | Kopp et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201045617 | Apr 2008 | CN |
102109530 | Jun 2011 | CN |
3909786 | Sep 1990 | DE |
102012000665 | Aug 2012 | DE |
102011090044 | Jul 2013 | DE |
0601213 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0775650 | May 1997 | EP |
0916406 | May 1999 | EP |
1122194 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1524525 | Apr 2005 | EP |
2119643 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2148117 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2327646 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2447701 | May 2012 | EP |
2500871 | Sep 2012 | EP |
2589966 | May 2013 | EP |
2502675 | Feb 2014 | EP |
2887071 | Jun 2015 | EP |
2165515 | Apr 1986 | GB |
S56-147209 | Nov 1981 | JP |
60-223481 | Nov 1985 | JP |
61-081323 | Apr 1986 | JP |
S61-069604 | Apr 1986 | JP |
S61-094925 | May 1986 | JP |
S61-174031 | Aug 1986 | JP |
S61-217434 | Sep 1986 | JP |
S62-100161 | May 1987 | JP |
S63-31918 | Feb 1988 | JP |
S63-48169 | Feb 1988 | JP |
S63-82433 | May 1988 | JP |
S63-290101 | Nov 1988 | JP |
1148966 | Jun 1989 | JP |
H01-266860 | Oct 1989 | JP |
H02-87903 | Mar 1990 | JP |
03-112393 | May 1991 | JP |
03-192013 | Aug 1991 | JP |
H03-38704 | Aug 1991 | JP |
H04-127063 | Apr 1992 | JP |
H05-69350 | Mar 1993 | JP |
H05-142232 | Jun 1993 | JP |
H05-180847 | Jul 1993 | JP |
06-26808 | Feb 1994 | JP |
H06-148198 | May 1994 | JP |
06-156730 | Jun 1994 | JP |
06-211306 | Aug 1994 | JP |
07-228345 | Aug 1995 | JP |
07-236838 | Sep 1995 | JP |
H07-301637 | Nov 1995 | JP |
H09-17848 | Jan 1997 | JP |
H11-083865 | Mar 1999 | JP |
H11-264828 | Sep 1999 | JP |
H11-304812 | Nov 1999 | JP |
H11-326336 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000-105243 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-105246 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2001-124786 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-240245 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002-250147 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2005-001055 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005-249740 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006-106008 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2007-309675 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2007-314262 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2007-322289 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2009-036643 | Feb 2009 | JP |
2009-062188 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009-145188 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009-300402 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2010-243310 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2010-271204 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2013-172009 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2013-190400 | Sep 2013 | JP |
685591 | Sep 1979 | SU |
1996036437 | Nov 1996 | WO |
2003042048 | May 2003 | WO |
2007024540 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2008133708 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2009002358 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2010042722 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2012170636 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010087303 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010129715 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2012158520 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012158541 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013152089 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2013169778 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2013177087 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2013177163 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014059134 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2014071214 | May 2014 | WO |
2015104263 | Jul 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Gue, Kevin R. and Kim, Byung Soo, Puzzle-Based Storage Systems, Naval Research Logistics, 2007, pp. 556-567, vol. 54. |
International Search Report dated Nov. 7, 2016, in Application No. PCT/EP2016/061310, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180067141 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP2016/061310 | May 2016 | US |
Child | 15809032 | US |