The embodiments described herein relate to microwave filters, and more particularly to dielectric resonator filters and multiplexers realized using full cylindrical or half-cut dielectric resonators.
Microwave bandpass filters are commonly realized using one or more resonators. Broadly speaking, a resonator is any physical element that stores both magnetic and electric energy in a frequency-dependent way. The resonant frequency of a resonator is defined as any frequency at which the stored electric and magnetic energies in the resonator are equal, and at that frequency the resonator is said to be in resonance.
Realizations of microwave resonators, however, are not so limited. At microwave frequencies, potentially any three-dimensional structure can be used to realize a resonator, in which internal electric and magnetic field distributions are generally determined by the shape and size of the overall structure. Some classes of microwave resonators include lumped element, microstrip, coaxial, waveguide, and dielectric resonators. Each class has application specific advantages and disadvantages.
In general, a dielectric resonator (DR) cavity comprises a dielectric resonator formed in a high-permittivity substrate mounted inside a metallic housing using a mounting support formed in a low-permittivity substrate. Compared to lumped element and microstrip resonators, dielectric resonators (as well as coaxial and waveguide resonators) tend to be bulkier in size and more complex in design, but offer superior Q values. In present microwave technologies, dielectric resonators offer Q values in the range of 3,000 to 40,000 at 1 GHz. For this reason, dielectric resonator filters are often favoured for use in satellite/space communication and wireless base station applications, where low loss and high power can be overriding design considerations. In addition to the Q values, resonator size and spurious performance (the frequency separation between an operating mode of the resonator and adjacent resonant modes) can also be important design considerations
Dielectric resonators are also commonly operated as single-mode resonators, and dual-mode resonators, and less commonly as triple-mode and quadruple-mode resonators. A single-mode resonator supports only a single field distribution at the resonator's center frequency. Correspondingly, a dual-mode resonator supports two different field distributions and a triple-mode resonator supports three different field distributions. The intention for using a higher number of modes is mainly size reduction, as one physical resonator is overloaded with more than one electrical resonator, and each electrical resonator is supported by a mode distribution. Resonance modes, such as dual and triple-modes, which support a plurality of field distributions at the center frequency, are referred to as degenerate modes. In the usual case, the different field distributions in a degenerate mode are orthogonal modes of a similar field distribution and are created due to symmetries in the resonator. Thus, dual modes have been mainly realized with resonators having 90-degree radial symmetry (cylindrical and rectangular waveguide cavities and resonators), while triple modes are supported for example in cubic waveguide cavities and cubic dielectric resonators.
Quadruple-mode dielectric resonators have also been realized, but mainly due to complications in fabrication and tuning, comparatively less interest has been generated in this area. In order to realize a quadruple-mode dielectric resonator, independent or near independent control over the coupling and tuning of each of the four modes is required, which generally results in a complex overall coupling scheme involving a large number of tuning and/or coupling screws. Although tuning and coupling schemes necessary for single-mode and dual-mode dielectric resonators add some design complexity as well, the added design complexities are more pronounced in triple-mode dielectric resonators, and even more pronounced in presently known realizations of quadruple-mode dielectric resonators. Dual-mode, triple-mode, and quadruple-mode resonators remain attractive alternatives to single-mode dielectric resonators, however, because of their associated size reduction, especially considering that dielectric resonators already tend to be bulky. For the applications in which dielectric resonator filters are preferred, e.g. satellite/space systems, size and mass reduction are highly desirable.
The embodiments described herein provide in one aspect a dielectric resonator assembly for use in one of a dielectric resonator filter and a dielectric resonator multiplexer, the dielectric resonator assembly comprising: a) a dielectric resonator; b) the dielectric resonator formed in a unitary piece of high-permittivity dielectric substrate into a half-cut cylinder of a selected height and a selected diameter, the half-cut cylinder defined by a parallel pair of semi-circular surfaces, a curved surface extending along respective curved edges of the pair of semi-circular surfaces, and a rectangular surface subtending the curved surface, wherein a first dimension of the rectangular surface corresponds to the selected height and a second dimension of the rectangular surface corresponds to the selected diameter; wherein the dielectric resonator resonates in a plurality of resonance modes comprising a ½HEH11 mode and a ½HEE11 mode and, at the selected height and the selected diameter, the ½HEH11 mode and the ½HEE11 are mode are operating modes of the dielectric resonator assembly.
The embodiments described herein provide in another aspect a dielectric resonator assembly for use in one of a dielectric resonator filter and a dielectric resonator multiplexer, the dielectric resonator assembly comprising: a) a dielectric resonator; b) the dielectric resonator formed in a unitary piece of high-permittivity dielectric substrate into a cylinder of a selected height and a selected diameter;
wherein the dielectric resonator resonates in a plurality of resonance modes comprising an HEH11 dual mode and an HEE11 dual mode and, at the selected height and the selected diameter, the HEH11 dual mode and the HEE11 dual mode are operating modes of the dielectric resonator assembly.
The embodiments described herein provide in another aspect a dielectric resonator filter comprising: a) at least one dielectric resonator assembly comprising a dielectric resonator formed in a unitary piece of high-permittivity dielectric substrate into one of: (i) a half-cut cylinder of a selected height and a selected diameter, the half-cut cylinder defined by a parallel pair of semi-circular surfaces, a curved surface extending along respective curved edges of the pair of semi-circular surfaces, and a rectangular surface subtending the curved surface, wherein a first dimension of the rectangular surface corresponds to the selected height and a second dimension of the rectangular surface corresponds to the selected diameter; and (ii) a cylinder of the selected height and the selected diameter; wherein the dielectric resonator resonates in a plurality of resonance modes comprising operating modes of the dielectric resonator assembly and, at the selected height and the selected diameter, the half-cut cylinder resonates in a ½HEH11 mode and a ½HEE11 mode, and the cylinder resonates in an HEH11 dual mode and an HEE11 dual mode.
The embodiments described herein provide in another aspect a dielectric resonator multiplexer comprising: a) at least one dielectric resonator assembly comprising a dielectric resonator formed in a unitary piece of high-permittivity dielectric substrate into one of: (i) a half-cut cylinder of a selected height and a selected diameter, the half-cut cylinder defined by a parallel pair of semi-circular surfaces, a curved surface extending along respective curved edges of the pair of semi-circular surfaces, and a rectangular surface subtending the curved surface, wherein a first dimension of the rectangular surface corresponds to the selected height and a second dimension of the rectangular surface corresponds to the selected diameter; and (ii) a cylinder of the selected height and the selected diameter; wherein the dielectric resonator resonates in a plurality of resonance modes comprising operating modes of the dielectric resonator assembly and, at the selected height and the selected diameter, the half-cut cylinder resonates in a ½HEH11 mode and a ½HEE11 mode, and the cylinder resonates in an HEH11 mode and an HEE11 mode.
The embodiments described herein provide in another aspect a method of manufacturing a unitary resonator assembly for use in one of a dielectric resonator filter and a dielectric resonator multiplexer, said method comprising: a) providing a dielectric material; b) forming the dielectric material into full cylinder of a selected height and a selected diameter; wherein the dielectric resonator resonates in a plurality of resonance modes comprising an HEH11 mode and an HEE11 mode and, at the selected height and the selected diameter, the HEH11 mode and the HEE11 mode are operating modes of the dielectric resonator assembly.
Further aspects and advantages of the embodiments described herein will appear from the following description taken together with the accompanying drawings.
For a better understanding of the embodiments described herein and to show more clearly how they may be carried into effect, reference will now be made, by way of example only, to the accompanying drawings which show at least one exemplary embodiment, and in which:
It will be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements shown in the figures have not necessary been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements may be exaggerated relative to other elements for clarity. Further, where considered appropriate, reference numerals may be repeated among the figures to indicate corresponding or analogous elements.
One of the more popular dielectric resonator topologies is the cylindrical resonator, which may be operated in a single TEH resonant mode, as well as in dual degenerate HEH11 or dual degenerate HEE11 resonant modes. By sizing its diameter D and length L to have a particular D/L ratio, however, the dual HEH11 and HEE11 modes of the cylindrical resonator can be made to resonate at a common resonant frequency, thereby converting the full cylinder dielectric resonator into a relatively simple and compact quadruple-mode resonator. Single cavity, four-pole filters (and more generally N-cavity, 4N-pole filters) can then be realized using the full cylinder operated in a quad-mode, wherein the centre frequency of the filter is given by the common resonant frequency of the quad-mode.
The structure of the quad-mode cylinder can be simplified by cutting lengthwise along its central axis to produce a new class of half-cut cylindrical resonators. Similar to the quad-mode cylinder, by appropriate sizing of its diameter and length, the half-cut dielectric resonator can be operated as a dual-mode resonator, the two modes in the half-cut cylinder corresponding respectively to half of a single component of the degenerate HEH11 and HEE11 modes (hereinafter referred to as the “½HEH11 mode” and the “½HEE11 mode”). This realization of a half-cut cylindrical resonator is totally different from the image-type realization that uses metals in contact with the resonator along cut lines to simulate an ideal electric wall boundary condition. By exploiting a naturally occurring magnetic wall boundary condition in the HEH11 and HEE11 modes, no metals are required for the half-cut dielectric resonator and all losses and design constraints incurred by inclusion of the metals can be saved. Considerable size reductions are achieved, and complex tuning and/or coupling arrangements are largely avoided. The half-cut dielectric resonator can be used to realize a general class of N-cavity, 2N-pole dual-mode filters, as well as other non-fully dual-mode filters.
Both the full cylindrical and the half-cut cylindrical resonator have further application in dual-band filters. If the diameter and length of the cylinder are sized differently, the dual HEH11 and HEE11 modes (or alternatively the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes) will resonate at separate resonant frequencies. The two frequency bands of the dual-band filter can then be carried by a corresponding resonant mode, wherein the center frequencies of the two bands will be given by the different resonant frequencies of the HEH11 and HEE11 modes (or alternatively by the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes). The full cylindrical resonator can be used to realize N-cavity, dual-band filters with 2N poles in each band, while the half-cut resonator can be used to realize N-cavity, dual-band filters with N poles in each band. As bases for dual-band filters, the full and half-cut cylindrical resonators are versatile in providing full or near full control over the centre frequencies and fractional bandwidths of the two frequency bands, as well as their frequency band separation. Prior dual-band filters that carry the dual-band on physically separate resonators within a single cavity are bulky. Carrying the dual-band instead on orthogonal resonant modes of a single physical resonator offers significant size reductions over prior filter realizations, and also greatly simplifies filter design by permitting essentially independent control of each band.
Suitable modification of the basic dual-band filter will also realize a dielectric resonator diplexer. Rather than coupling both bands of the dual-band to a common output channel, each band can be isolated and independently coupled to different output channels. Components of mixed frequency signals failing somewhere within the dual-band can then be separated. Improved output channel isolation can also be achieved by coupling the different channel outputs to resonators enclosed in separate resonator cavities. The basic diplexer concept is extendible to higher order multiplexers.
Spurious performance of the half-cut cylinder can also be improved by cutting one or more through-way slots between opposite surfaces. The first spurious mode of the half-cut dielectric resonator is the third eigenmode of the structure, and its E field lines circulate orthogonal to the E field lines in both the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes. Cutting a through-way slot generally parallel to the E field lines of the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes, but orthogonal to the E field lines in the first spurious mode, therefore, creates a selective barrier terminating the E field lines of the latter, while leaving the former largely undisturbed. The spurious free window of the half-cut dielectric resonator is thereby greatly increased. Cutting a second through-way slot orthogonal to the first will likewise terminate the E field lines of the fourth eigenmode of the structure (the second spurious mode), and thereby provide an even wider spurious free window.
These and other aspects of embodiments of the present invention are discussed in greater detail below.
Reference is first made to
The half-cut dielectric resonator 10 is formed by cutting the full cylindrical dielectric resonator 1 along its cylindrical axis to produce the half-cylindrical form shown in
Reference is now made to
Similarly,
As eigenmodes of the full cylinder, the dual HEH11 and HEE11 modes are substantially non-interactive. Neither the two components of the dual HEH11 mode nor the two components of the dual HEE11 mode couple, as they are all orthogonal to one another. The dual HEH11 and HEE11 modes also do not couple each other. The full cylindrical dielectric resonator 1 has a plurality of resonant modes of which the dual HEH11 and HEE11 modes represent only two pairs. The single TEH and single TME modes, which are also substantially non-interactive, are two other examples of resonant modes of the full cylinder.
It is evident in
Reference is now made to
As described above, both the HEH11 and HEE11 modes of the full cylindrical dielectric resonator 1 are dual modes on account of radial symmetry in the cylinder, each comprising two identical mode components. It is evident in
Reference is now made to
Qualitatively, the resonant frequency of a mode can be inversely related to the length of the circulating E field for that mode. Shorter circulation paths correlate with higher resonant frequencies. As the E field in the HEH11 mode circulates horizontally parallel to the circular surfaces 2, its path length is strongly dependent on the diameter D, but largely independent of the length L. In contrast, the E field in the orthogonal HEE11 mode circulates vertically, and thus its path length has a strong dependency on both the diameter D and the length L of the cylinder. Sizing of the length L therefore has an appreciable affect only on the resonant frequency of the HEE11 mode, while sizing of the diameter D, though some effect will be seen in the resonant frequency of HEE11 mode, has a proportionately greater effect on the resonant frequency of the HEH11 mode. These relative dependencies on the dimensions of the cylinder are reflected in the different slopes of curves 32 and 34, and thus also account for intersection point 38. Analytic models and mode charts, refined with full wave solvers, may be used for precise determination of the D/L ratio, and corresponding common resonant frequency, at intersection point 38. It will be appreciated however that setting D/L˜2 provides a good starting estimate for the computation, and that the exact D/L ratio will typically be slighter greater than 2.
By solving the D/L ratio at which the two dual modes of the full cylinder resonate at a common frequency, the full cylindrical dielectric resonator 1 can be sized for operation as a quadruple-mode resonator. Of course, it should be appreciated that only the D/L ratio is fixed for quad-mode operation and that the absolute values of D and L remain to be selected (so long as their ratio is preserved) in the design process based on a selected operating frequency. The four modes of the cylindrical quad-mode resonator then correspond to the dual HEH11 and HEE11 resonant modes. As these modes are eigenmodes of the structure, and thus orthogonal, the field distributions of the four modes theoretically do not interact or couple. Independent or near independent control over the four modes (coupling, tuning, etc.) is therefore possible. But unlike prior realizations of quad-mode filters, one constructed using a full cylinder dielectric resonator 1 sized for operation in a quad-mode will offer considerable size reductions and have comparatively less complex coupling and tuning mechanisms. Fabrication is simplified as well because cylindrical dielectric resonators with custom height and diameter are widely available commercially. Size reductions are seen equally in single-cavity, 4-pole filters, as in higher order, 4n-pole filters. Size reductions can be achieved for dual-mode filters by extending the quad-mode concept of the full cylinder to the half-cut cylinder.
Reference is now made to
It can also be observed that curves 42 and 44 trace out lower order modes than curve 46. In other words, over the whole range of D/L ratios, the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 resonate at a lower frequency than the ½TME mode, which confirms that the former are the first two eigenmodes of the half-cut cylindrical structure. Of course, the relative ordering of the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes depends on the selected D/L ratio of the half-cut cylinder. Each of the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes can constitute either the first or the second eigenmode. Similar trends are observed in the mode chart 30, except that the HEH11 and HEE11 modes constitute second and third eigenmodes of the structure. The TEH mode that does not appear in the half-cut cylinder (because its E fields circulate in an azimuthal plane) constitutes the first eigenmode of the full cylinder.
As with the full cylinder, resonant frequency is qualitatively related to the length of the circulating E field in a particular mode. Like the HEH11 and HEE11 modes, the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes of the half-cut cylinder have relative dependencies on the diameter D and length L. The horizontally circulating E field in the ½HEH11 remains strongly dependent on the diameter D and largely independent of the length L, while the E field in the orthogonal ½HEE11 mode retains its strong dependency on both these dimensions. Sizing the length L therefore again predominantly influences the resonant frequency of the ½HEE11 mode, while sizing of the diameter D predominantly influences the resonant frequency of the ½HEH11 mode, and thus account for the intersection point 48. Analytic models and mode charts, refined with full wave solvers, again may be used to determine intersection point 48 exactly. But because the rectangular surface 18 provides a relatively good magnetic wall boundary, as with the full cylinder, setting D/L˜2 still provides a good starting estimate for the computation and the exact D/L ratio will still typically be greater than 2.
When the diameter D and length L are appropriately selected so that the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes resonate at a common resonant frequency, the half-cut cylindrical dielectric resonator can be operated as a dual-mode resonator in a dual-mode filter. Since the two modes are eigenmodes of the structure, their E field distributions are orthogonal and can coexist within the structure without appreciable interaction or coupling. The center frequency of the dual-mode filter will be set by the common resonant frequency of the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes. A dual-mode filter realized in this way using an appropriately sized half-cut cylindrical resonator is unlike other realizations of dual-mode filters insofar as the two resonant modes are provided by a single physical resonator and have completely different field distributions. Other realizations of dual-mode filters involve two physically separate resonators resonating in the same mode (i.e. two parallel coupled resonators) or else one physical resonator operating in a degenerate mode. A good example of the latter is the dual HEH11 or dual HEE11 modes of the full cylindrical dielectric resonator 1. Considerable size reductions can be achieved by using the half-cut dielectric resonator 10 operating in a dual-mode instead. Simplified coupling schemes are also made possible by the relative orthogonality of the dual-mode.
Although the half-cut dielectric resonator 10 can be made to operate as a dual-mode resonator through appropriate sizing of its D/L ratio, it is possible also to select other D/L ratios in order to synthesize other classes of microwave filters. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the D/L ratio of the half-cut dielectric resonator 10 is selected so that the ½HEH11 resonates at a first resonant frequency (hereinafter “fH”), while the ½HEE11 mode resonates at a second resonant frequency (hereinafter “fE”) different from the first resonant frequency. By this selection of D/L ratio, the half-cut dielectric resonator 10 can operate as a dual-band resonator for use in a dual-band filter. The two bands of the dual band filter will be carried by the corresponding different resonant modes of the half-cut dielectric resonator 10. One of the dual bands is thus supported by the ½HEH11 mode and has center frequency fH, while the other of the two bands is supported by the ½HEE11 mode and has center frequency fE. Accordingly, the centre frequencies of the dual bands will correspond to the separate resonant frequencies of the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes.
It is evident from
A dual band filter may generally be defined, among other parameters, by the center frequencies of its two bands, fH and fE, and their frequency separation, Δf=|fH−fE|. By appropriate selection of the diameter D and length L of the half-cut dielectric resonator 10, the filter parameters fH, fE, Δf can be designed according to meet specification. It should again be appreciated that the diameter D and length L are independent variables. Consequently, fH, fE and Δf will generally depend, not just on the D/L ratio, but also on their absolute values. Full sweeps of both variables may therefore be required when designing a dual-band filter using half-cut dielectric resonators to meet specifications. As above, analytic models and mode charts, refined with full wave solvers, if necessary, may be used to solve values for D and L that will realize the desired filter specifications (e.g. fH, fE, Δf).
When designing and synthesizing microwave filters, such as dual-mode, quad-mode or dual-band filters, it is generally desirable to be provided with independent, or near independent, control over each resonant mode. Many filter synthesis techniques require independent control over resonant mode coupling and tuning for proper placement of the filter's transmission zeros as a separate step once the resonators have been designed for proper placement of the filter's poles. Filter synthesis is greatly complicated where independent control over the resonant modes is lacking. The full cylindrical or half-cut dielectric resonators discussed herein largely avoid this complication because each operating resonant mode of these structures is also an eigenmode and thus orthogonal. That property of the full and half-cut dielectric resonators is exploited to realize controllable, effective and relatively straightforward coupling mechanisms for microwave filters, including inter-cavity mode coupling, intra-cavity mode coupling, and input-output mode coupling. Each of these coupling mechanisms, it should be appreciated, is necessary for advanced microwave filter synthesis. In the discussion to follow, these and other aspects of dielectric resonator filters and multiplexers realized using full cylindrical or half-cut dielectric resonators are explained in greater detail.
Reference is now made to
A suitable aperture or iris defined in the common wall between resonator cavities 50a, 50b is used to couple either or both resonant modes of half-cut dielectric resonator 10a to corresponding resonant modes of the half-cut dielectric resonator 10b. The general shape of the aperture determines the resonant mode or modes that are coupled, and its size determines the amount of coupling. This result is intuitive by considering that the aperture behaves like a waveguide subject to cutoff, which consequently passes only one field polarization. The polarization of a resonant mode is therefore a relevant factor in selecting the shape and size of the aperture, and polarization-discriminant apertures can be designed for each resonant mode of the half-cut dielectric resonator 10.
The horizontal iris 54 shown in
The coupling coefficient of two adjacent resonators can be determined according to different approaches. One approach is to solve the frequencies of the first two eigenmodes of the full-coupled structure. The coupling coefficient is then given by
where f1 and f2 are the first and second resonant frequencies of the full-coupled structure. This approach can be extended for the case of a dual-band filter by solving the frequencies of the first four eigenmodes of the full-coupled structure. The coupling coefficient of the lower band is given by Eq. 1, and the coupling coefficient of the upper band is similarly given by
where f3 and f4 are the resonant frequencies of the third and fourth eigenmodes of the full-coupled structure.
In an alternative approach, computational complexity can be reduced by exploiting symmetry in the full-coupled structure and employing even-odd mode analysis. A symmetry plane is placed half way between the two resonators through the middle of the cross-shaped iris 58. The symmetry plane simulates an ideal magnetic wall in even-mode analysis and an ideal electric wall in odd-mode analysis. The coupling coefficient, k, is then given by
where fm and fe are the even-mode and odd-mode resonant frequencies of the full-coupled structure, respectively. The same calculation can be performed to determine the coupling coefficient, k′, for the upper band of a dual-band.
Yet another approach to determining coupling coefficients is the S-parameter approach (e.g. described in R. Cameron, C. Kudsia & R. Mansour, Microwave Filters for Communication Systems. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007). The inter-cavity aperture is modeled as a discontinuity between two transmission lines (corresponding to the two resonator cavities). The coupling coefficient, k, can then be determined by transforming the solved S-parameters of the waveguide discontinuity into an equivalent T-network comprising a shunt impedance inverter. The coupling coefficient is then derived from the inverter impedance.
Once the coupling coefficient, k, has been determined, for example using one of the above-described approaches, dimensions for the inter-cavity aperture (width, height, thickness) can be swept in order to design a suitable iris 54, 56, 58 that provides the desired amount of inter-cavity coupling of adjacent resonators. Clearly this procedure can be repeated for a plurality of adjacent resonator cavities inter-connected by apertures. The coupling-matrix approach to filter synthesis (described in Microwave Filters) would then involve designing each iris in the synthesized filter to provide the required amount of coupling as specified in M matrix derived under that approach. Advanced filter synthesis is greatly simplified by the largely independent control over inter-cavity coupling provided by the half-cut dielectric resonator 10.
Reference is now made to
Screw 60 is fastened to an inner wall of the resonator cavity 50 and projects interiorly into the cavity. In the presence of electromagnetic fields, and depending on its location, screw 60 attracts fields of one resonant mode and causes them to leak over into other resonant modes, thereby providing a mechanism for intra-cavity coupling of resonant modes. It should be appreciated that screw 60 is formed out of metal in some embodiments, but that other materials may be substituted in other embodiments. When fastened directly to the inner walls of the resonator cavity 50, metals screws can sometimes give rise to unwanted propagation of a coaxial mode within the resonator cavity 50. To suppress this spurious resonance mode, therefore, a dielectric-metal screw can be used instead of a metal screw so that direct metal-to-metal contact with the inner wall of the resonator cavity 50 is avoided. It should also be appreciated that the shape of screw 60 is variable, and that rods, poles and other general forms of projections of varying lengths and widths may be substituted.
Screw 60 offers a convenient and controllable mechanism for coupling the orthogonal ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes of the half-cut dielectric resonator 10. As eigenmodes of the structure, the natural field distributions of ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes do not appreciably interact or couple. However, a screw 60 located appropriately within the resonator cavity 50 will disturb the natural field distributions of ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes simultaneously, and thereby couple these two orthogonal and otherwise non-interactive modes. Areas within resonator cavity 50 in which the E fields of both the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 mode are concentrated provide suitable locations for the screw 60. At these locations, corresponding interactive E fields will be created in the screw 60, the effect of which is to couple the two resonant modes. However, as will be described in more detail below, the amount of coupling is variable depending on the dimensions, as well as the location and orientation, of the screw 60.
Screw 60 can also be located within the resonator 50 so that only the field distributions of one resonant mode of the half-cut dielectric resonator 10 are substantially perturbed. To the field distributions of the other resonant mode, the screw 60 will appear non-existent. Screw 60 can therefore be located so as to perturb the field distributions of the ½HEH11 mode only, while the ½HEE11 mode largely unaffected; and likewise, so as to perturb the field distributions of the ½HEE11 mode only, while leaving the ½HEH11 mode largely unaffected. Perturbing the field distributions of a resonant mode will cause a small shift in the resonant frequency of that mode, either up or down, which may be useful to tune the resonant frequency of that mode. Often tuning screws are required to tune the resonant frequency of a cavity to its designed centre frequency. Exactly sized resonators are normally hard to achieve and some tolerance in the resonator's dielectric constant should be expected. Thus a practical resonator will often not realize its designed centre frequency without the aid of tuning screws. It should be appreciated, however, that the centre frequency is still predominantly determined by the dimensions of the resonator and cavity, and that tuning screws only provide a mechanism for making slight corrections in order to re-align the resonator's centre frequency with its designed value.
Reference is now made to
The amount of intra-cavity resonant mode coupling provided by coupling screw 62 is variable depending its dimensions and location. For example, the distance and angle of the coupling screw 62 relative to the upper straight edge 20 affect the amount of coupling provided. Moving the coupling screw 62 diagonally further away from the half-cut resonator 10 will tend to decrease the amount of coupling provided, and vice versa. Moving the coupling screw 62 horizontally toward the centre of semi-circular surface 12 or vertically toward the centre of rectangular surface 18 will also tend to decrease the amount of coupling provide as the field distributions in these locations tend to be concentrated in one or the other resonant mode only. Accordingly, field mode interaction decreases in both directions. Good coupling of the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 resonant modes is achieved by locating the coupling screw 62, as shown in
In addition to its location and orientation within the resonator cavity 50, the dimensions of coupling screw 62 also affect the amount of intra-cavity resonant mode coupling provided by coupling screw 62. Coupling can generally be increased by providing longer and thicker couplings screws.
Tuning screw 64 is positioned above the centre of semi-circular surface 12 and tuning screw 66 is positioned adjacent the centre of curved surface 14. As there is no more than weak interaction between the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes in these locations, tuning screws 64, 66, unlike coupling screw 62, do not provide an appreciable amount of intra-cavity mode coupling. Instead tuning screws 64, 66 provide largely independent tuning of the ½HEE11 and ½HEH11 modes, respectively. The field distribution of the ½HEE11 mode is concentrated above the centre of semi-circular surface 12 where tuning screw 64 is located. Accordingly, tuning screw 64 is used to tune the resonant frequency of the ½HEE11 mode. Likewise, tuning screw 66 is located adjacent the centre of curved surface 14, where the field distribution of the ½HEH11 mode is concentrated, and serves the same purpose for the ½HEH11 mode. Independent or near independent resonant mode tuning is possible because the orthogonal field mode distributions of the two resonant modes are relatively non-interactive in the vicinity of each tuning screw 64, 66.
Reference is now made to
The same process followed for determining the coupling coefficient with respect to inter-cavity mode coupling can be followed as well for intra-cavity mode coupling. Joint simulation of the half-cut dielectric resonator 10, resonator cavity 50 and coupling screw 62 using an eigenmode solver can be used to solve the first two resonant frequencies of the coupled structure. Tuning screws 64, 66 may be omitted from the simulation as they compensate for non-ideal effects in real resonators. The coupling coefficient, k, is then given again by Eq. 1. If desired, the coupling coefficient, k′, can also be solved according to Eq. 2. It should be appreciated that even-odd mode analysis may not be available here due to lack of symmetry in the resonator cavity 50. S-parameter analysis may be performed but with added complexity as coupling here is between two resonant modes of a single physical resonator. Once the coupling coefficient, k, has been determined, parameters of the coupling screw 62 (length, diameter, etc.) can be swept using an appropriate solver (and, if necessary, interpolated) in order to design a coupling screw that provides the desired amount of intra-cavity coupling. This procedure can be repeated as required in the coupling matrix approach to filter synthesis.
Reference is now made to
Depending on the location and orientation of electromagnetic probe 70, one of the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes can be coupled to the external connector 72 independently of the other mode. Alternatively both the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes can be coupled simultaneously to the external connector 72. The location and orientation of electromagnetic probe 70 within the resonator cavity 50 affects the amount of coupling of each resonant mode. In general, the electromagnetic probe 70 will couple a resonant mode of the half-cut dielectric resonator 10 when the field distribution of that resonant mode is concentrated in the immediate vicinity. Simultaneous coupling of both the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes is achieved by locating the electromagnetic probe 70 diagonally away from the upper straight edge 20 of the half-cut dielectric resonator 10. As with the coupling screw 62, the field distributions of both resonant modes are concentrated in this area. Moving the electromagnetic probe 70 diagonally closer to or away from the straight edge 20 again will increase or decrease the amount coupling of the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes.
The orthogonality of the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 resonant modes permits electromagnetic probe 70 to be located so as to selectively couple only one resonant mode independently of the other. As illustrated in
Reference is now made to
In addition to its location and orientation with resonator cavity 50, similar to the coupling screw 62, the dimensions (length, thickness) of electromagnetic probe 70, 70a, 70b affect the amount of input-output coupling of half-cut dielectric resonator 10. Longer and thicker tend to achieve greater mode coupling. Full wave solvers, may be used to solve dimensions and an orientation for the electromagnetic probe 70, 70a, 70b to achieve a desired amount of input/output coupling according to design specifications.
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
The coupling scheme illustrated in
As the resonators R1-R4 are arranged in C1, C2 in folded formation, additional mode cross-couplings (dotted lines) can be introduced in order to realize more advanced filters. These additional available cross-couplings may be useful, for example, to control placement of transmission zeros. The exemplary coupling scheme shown in
Inter-cavity cross-coupling of adjacent resonators is possible as well. The exemplary scheme shown in
Alternatively,
Input coupling (S-R, S-R2) is realized using an electromagnetic probe 70 in cavity C1 that couples both the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes simultaneously. Similarly output coupling (R3-L, R4-L) is realized using an electromagnetic probe 70 in cavity C2 that couples both the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes simultaneously. For example, the electromagnetic probes 70 may be located diagonally adjacent the upper straight edge 20 of each respective half-cut dielectric resonator 10. As each band is carried by a resonator pair resonating in different resonant modes, inter-cavity mode coupling (R1-R4, R2-R3) is provided by a suitable aperture that couples both the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes simultaneously, e.g. cross-shaped aperture 58 of selected dimensions. No coupling screws 62 are included in this scheme because no intra-cavity cross-coupling of resonant modes (R1-R2 and R3-R4) is needed in the dual-branch scheme. Any number of tuning screws 64, 66 could also be included if desired.
Reference is now made to
All possible couplings and cross-couplings that are achievable for an 8-pole dielectric resonator filter realized using half-cut dielectric resonators 10 are shown in
Of course, it should also be appreciated that not every resonator pair can be cross-coupled. For example, resonators R1, R7 although located in adjacent cavities C1, C4 cannot be cross-coupled because resonators R1, R7 are implemented by orthogonal resonant modes. Moreover, resonators R1, R5 although implemented by parallel resonator modes cannot be cross-coupled because resonators R1, R5 are not located in adjacent cavities. In general, orthogonal resonant modes located in the same cavity, as well parallel resonant modes located in adjacent cavities can be cross-coupled. All other resonator pairs cannot. The source and load can also be coupled to each orthogonal resonant mode in the first and last cavity, respectively.
As described herein, the full cylindrical and half-cut dielectric resonators, together with their associated coupling mechanisms, can be used to realize different classes of resonator filters. For example, the full cylindrical dielectric resonator can be used to realize quad-mode resonator filters, while the half-cut dielectric resonator can be used to realize dual-mode resonator filters. Each can also be used to realize dual-band resonator filters, as well as diplexers and higher-order multiplexers. Exemplary realizations of each of these classes of microwave filters will now be described. It should be appreciated, however, that the descriptions to follow are exemplary only and that other possible realizations are within the scope of the disclosure.
Reference is now made to
Input and output coupling are provided using electromagnetic probes 170a and 170b, respectively, of length Hp and located a distance Xp away from the central axis of the cylindrical cavity 150. Electromagnetic probe 170a is in electrical contact with external connector 172a and electromagnetic probe 170b is in electrical contact with external connector 172b, and there is approximately 90 degrees of radial separation between the two electromagnetic probes 170a, 170b. With that configuration, one component from each of the dual HEH11 and HEE11 mode pairs aligns with electromagnetic probe 170a on the input channel, and is thereby coupled to the external connector 172a, while the other component from each of the two mode pairs aligns with electromagnetic probe 170b on the output channel, and is thereby coupled to the external connector 172b. The amount of input and output mode coupling provided by electromagnetic probes 170a, 170b is determined predominantly by the length Hp and distance Xp, which can be varied to provide different amounts of couplings, as needed, to meet design specifications for the filter 100.
As shown in
Resonant mode coupling and tuning is achieved by inclusion of several tuning and coupling screws in dielectric resonator filter 100. More specifically, screws 104 and 105 located opposite electromagnetic probe 170a couple the two mode components (one from each of the HEH11 and HEE11 mode pairs) that align with electromagnetic probe 170b, as well as tune the resonant frequencies of these modes to the center frequency of the quad-mode filter. Likewise, screws 106 and 107 located opposite electromagnetic probe 170b couple the two other components of the degenerate HEH11 and HEE11 mode pairs that align with electromagnetic probe 170b, as well as tune the resonant frequencies of these modes to center frequency of the quad-mode filter. Screws 108 and 109 located at 45 degrees from each electromagnetic probe 170a, 170b couple the two orthogonal mode components from each of the HEH11 and HEE11 degenerate mode pairs. This arrangement of coupling and tuning screws 104-109, it should be appreciated, provides coupling of the dual HEH11 and HEE11 mode pairs for operation in a quad-mode. Other screw arrangements are also possible to realize the different mode couplings in the filter.
Screws 104, 106, 108 extend horizontally and radially outward from the circumferential surface of full cylindrical dielectric resonator 1 and are axially centered within the cylindrical cavity 150, equidistant from the top and bottom walls of the cylindrical cavity 102. Screws 105, 107, 109 extend vertically from either the bottom (shown) or top (not shown) of the cylindrical cavity 150 at a radial distance Xs away from the central axis of the cylindrical cavity 150. The amount of tuning and resonant mode coupling provided by screws 104-109 is determined by their respective dimensions and locations within the cylindrical cavity 150. Full wave solvers, may be used in the design and synthesis stages for the filter 100 in order to precisely determine the dimensions and locations of the screws 104-109 to meet design specifications.
Reference is now made to
It is evident in plot 140 that the passband of the filter 100′ only has a steep out of band rejection on the low side, whereas the passband of the filter 100 in plot 130 has a steep out of band rejection on both sides. The improved performance is due to the fact that arranging electromagnetic probes 170a, 170b at opposite ends of the cylindrical cavity 150, as in filter 100, places transmission zeros on both sides of the passband. In contrast, arranging electromagnetic probes from the same end of cylindrical cavity 150, as in filter 100′, only places a single transmission zero on the low side of the passband. The extra transmission zero can be explained the polarity reversal of the output coupling relative to the input coupling, which creates a 180° out of band phase shift that is subtractive, not additive, at the output.
The out of band rejection of the quad-mode filters 100, 100′ is also affected by the input and output channels (i.e. electromagnetic probes 170a, 170b) being located in the same physical cavity (i.e. cylindrical cavity 150). Out of band rejection is normally improved in higher order filters, such as a dual-cavity, 8-pole filters, where the input and output channels are located in physically separate cavities. Another approach to improving out of band rejection is to design a 6-pole filter in which input and output coupling is made to single-mode cavities coupled to a quad-mode cavity, such as the ones illustrated in
It should also be appreciated that with suitable modification the quad-mode filters 100, 100′ can be converted into dual-mode, dual-band filters. It is recalled that a dual-band filter can be realized using the half-cut dielectric resonator 10 by carrying each band on a separate resonant mode, one on the ½HEH11 mode and the other on the ½HEE11 mode. The same general concept is applicable to the full cylinder resonating in the degenerate HEH11 and HEE11 modes. Thus the synthesized filter will additionally be dual-mode. In the filters 100, 110′, electromagnetic probe 170a couples to one component from each of the HEH11 and HEE11 modes, while electromagnetic probe 170b couples to the other orthogonal component of these dual modes. Moreover, screws 108 and 109 located at 45 degrees from each electromagnetic probe 170a, 170b couple the two orthogonal mode components from each of the HEH11 and HEE11 degenerate mode pairs. This arrangement of electromagnetic probes and screws, without needed to include screws 104-107, therefore provides a dual-branch coupling scheme required in dual-mode filters. Removing screws 104-107 (or else reconfiguring them so as to tune, but not couple the two mode components, one from each of the HEH11 and HEE11 mode pairs, that align with a respective electromagnetic probe 170a, 170b) will thus convert quad-mode filters 100, 100′ into corresponding dual-mode, dual-band filters. Higher order dual-mode and mixed quad-mode and dual-mode filters are possible as well using this arrangement of screws.
Reference is now made to
Appropriate sizing of the half-cut dielectric resonators 210a-210c and selection of a coupling scheme (analogous to the dual-branch scheme illustrated in FIG. 9D) will realize the 3-pole, dual-band dielectric resonator 200. The diameter D and length L of each resonator 210a-210c are selected so that the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes resonate at different resonant frequencies, fH and fE, respectively, corresponding to the centre frequencies of the two bands in the dual-band filter, and with a frequency band separation, Δf. The dimensions D and L may then be swept in order to meet design specifications imposed on fH, fE and Δf. Each band in the dual-band filter 200 is carried by a corresponding different resonant mode of the resonators 210a-210c.
In conforming with the coupling scheme presented in
The basic topology of the dual-band filter 200 can also, after suitable modification, realize a 6-pole, dual-mode filter. The diameter D and length L of each resonator 210a-210c can be adjusted so that the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes of each resonate at a common resonant frequency. Appropriate sizing and positioning of electromagnetic probes, screws and inter-cavity apertures can then realize a coupling scheme suitable for a 6-pole, dual-band filter (analogous to the scheme illustrated in
Reference is now made to
Appropriate sizing of the half-cut dielectric resonators 310a, 310b and selection of a coupling scheme (analogous to the dual-branch scheme illustrated in
Reference is now made to
As in the diplexer 300, electromagnetic probe 470a couples both the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes of resonator 410a to the external connecter 472a, and cross-shaped iris 358 then couples the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes of resonator 410a to the corresponding modes of resonator 410b. However, unlike the diplexer 300, diplexer 400 further comprises resonators 410c, 410d respectively enclosed in resonator cavities 450c, 450d. Horizontal iris 454 couples the ½HEE11 modes of resonators 410b and 410d, while substantially isolating the ½HEH11 modes, and vertical iris 456 couples the ½HEH11 modes of resonators 410b and 410c, while substantially isolating the ½HEE11 mode. Thus, the joint effect of horizontal iris 454 and vertical iris 456 is to guide the ½HEH11 resonant mode into resonator cavity 450c and the ½HEE11 resonant mode into resonator cavity 450d. Electromagnetic probe 470c then couples the ½HEH11 mode of resonator 410c to the external connector 472c, and electromagnetic probe 470d couples the ½HEE11 mode of resonator 410d to the external connector 472d. Alternatively, half-cut dielectric resonators 410c, 410d can be replaced with full cylinders operating in a single TEH mode, or other resonant mode, as discussed in greater detail below.
Reference is now made to
It is evident in plot 440 that better output isolation is achieved in the diplexer 400 as compared to the diplexer 300. In the lower passband (corresponding to transmission of the ½HEH11 mode to port 2), about −25 dB transmission to port 3 is seen in plot 430 as compared to only about −75 dB in plot 440. Similarly in the upper passband (corresponding to transmission of the ½HEH11 mode to port 3), about −15 dB transmission to port 2 is seen in plot 430 as compared to only about −50 dB in plot 440. The improved output mode isolation is due to the physical separation of the channels in different resonator cavities. Plots 430 and 440, it should be appreciated, also confirm that the dual-band is carried on separate resonant modes of the half-cut dielectric resonator 10.
It should be appreciated that a plurality of resonator diplexers can be combined to realize higher-order multiplexers. For example, a plurality of diplexers can be realized, according to the above-described embodiments, wherein the dual-band in each of the diplexers are defined for different centre frequencies to realize a multi-band defined by a plurality of centre frequencies. The input electromagnetic probe can then be coupled to each of the plurality of diplexers, in that way realizing a higher order multiplexer. A forked electromagnetic probe, for example, could be used to couple each of the diplexers to a common input. As before, in each of the plurality of diplexers, the input electromagnetic probe can be oriented to couple to both the ½HEH11 mode and ½HEE11 mode of a first resonator. In that way, each of the plurality of diplexers can carry a dual-band on the two resonant modes.
In the exemplary embodiments described herein thus far, constructed from the full cylindrical or half-cut dielectric resonator, spurious performance has not been discussed in any length. Spurious performance, it should be understood, relates to the frequency range of a dielectric resonator in which only the resonator operating mode(s) are present, and no unwanted higher or lower order resonance modes appear. Due to the relative orthogonality of the lower order resonant modes of the half-cut dielectric resonator, a simple modification to the basic half-cut offers significant improvements in spurious performance. Exemplary embodiments of modified half-cut dielectric resonators are discussed below.
Reference is now made to
As shown in
Reference is now made to
The number of through-way slots included in the slotted half-cut dielectric resonator and their relative orientations are also variable. For example, slotted half-cut dielectric resonator 710 shown
In some embodiments, surface slots may be used instead of through-way slots. For example, slotted half-cut dielectric resonator 810 shown in
Reference is now made to
Accordingly, the E field lines illustrated in
It will further be appreciated that the E field lines illustrated in
It can be seen that the dual-slotted resonator 710 (
It should be appreciated that through-way slots cut into the full cylindrical dielectric resonator 1 would remove radial symmetry in the structure, and thus would potentially render the full cylindrical resonator unsuitable for quad-mode operation. For example, a vertical through-way slot, similar to though-way slot 515, cut along the cylindrical axis of the full cylinder would fix a symmetry plane 25 in the structure. One component from each of the HEH11 and HEE11 modes would align with the symmetry plane, while the corresponding orthogonal mode components would terminate at the cut. Clearly it would be possible to cut through-way slots into the full cylinder, though doing so would render the full cylinder unsuitable for some applications (i.e. quad-mode operation), while leaving it potentially still suitable for other applications (i.e. dual-mode operation in the two remaining aligned modes).
It should also be appreciated that the basic and slotted half-cut dielectric resonators can be used interchangeably in the exemplary dielectric filter and multiplexer realizations discussed herein. Accordingly, for a wider spurious free window, the dielectric resonator filter 200 (
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Electromagnetic probe 1070a couples both the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes of resonator 1010a to external connector 1072a, while electromagnetic probe 1070c couples both the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes of resonator 1010c to external connector 1072c. As mentioned, it can be seen that the dual-band filter 1000 differs from the dual-band filter 900 also in the location of the electromagnetic probes 1070a, 1070b relative to the half-cut dielectric resonators 1010a, 1010c. Electromagnetic probes 1070a, 1070c are located diagonally adjacent respective curved edges of the half-cut dielectric resonators 1010a, 1010b as opposed to diagonally adjacent respective straight edges. Placing the electromagnetic probes 1070a, 1070c.
When configured as shown in
It should be appreciated that the same result would not correspondingly hold for even order filters. In that case, the total number of phase reversals would be even and the total phase shift would be an even multiple of 180° phase shifts, corresponding to the even number of cavities in the filter. No inter-band transmission zero would occur because the two frequency bands will be in-phase and thus additive, not subtractive, at the output. Inter-band transmission zeros are still achievable in even order filters, however, as will be seen, by introducing an additional single phase reversal to provide an odd number of phase reversals overall.
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
With an even number of poles, the dual-band filter 1200 does not have an inter-band transmission zero. There is an overall even number of phase reversals for inter-band frequencies attributable to inter-cavity coupling, and thus the two modes are in-phase at the output. In contrast, the dual-band filter 1200′ (
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Resonator cavities 1250a-1250c enclosing resonators 1210a-1210c are configured to carry a dual-band. Electromagnetic probe couples external connector 1272a to both the ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes of resonator 1210a. Cross-shaped irises 1258a, 1258b couple to dual band to resonator 1210c intermediately through resonator 1210b. Vertical iris 1256 defined in one wall of resonator cavity 1250c guides the ½HEH11 mode into resonator cavity 1250d for coupling to the external connector 1272d. Similarly, horizontal iris 1254 defined in another wall of resonator cavity 1250c guides the ½HEE11 mode into resonator cavity 1250e for coupling to the external connector 1272e. Electromagnetic probes 1270d, 1270e are oriented to couple the TEH resonant modes of the full cylindrical resonators 1201d, 1201e, though it should be appreciated that they may be oriented otherwise to couple other resonant modes, if desired. For example, electromagnetic probes 1201d, 1201e could be located to couple either the HEH or HEE modes of resonators 1201d, 1201e.
It should also be appreciated that full cylindrical resonator 1201e is mounted to a side wall, rather than the floor, of resonator cavity 1250e using mounting support 1252e in order to couple the ½HEE11 mode of resonator 1210c to the TEH mode of resonator 1201e. In contrast, full cylindrical resonator 1201d is mounted to the floor of resonator cavity 1250d using mounting support 1252d in order to couple the ½HEH11 mode of resonator 1210c to the TEH mode of resonator 1201d. These relative orientations of resonators 1201d, 1201e are determined by the relative polarizations of the coupled modes. If a different mode of the resonators 1201d, 1201e were to be coupled (for example the HEH or HEE modes), different orientations of the resonators 1201d, 1201e could be used.
Reference is now made to
Method 2100 begins at step 2105, which comprises providing a block of a suitable high-permittivity dielectric material. In some embodiments, the dielectric constant of the material lies in the range 20<εr<100, though in other embodiments the dielectric constant may be higher or lower. The block of dielectric material should have a volume at least that of the dielectric resonator to be manufactured.
Step 2110 comprises forming the dielectric material into a cylinder of a selected diameter D and a selected length L. The selected values of D and L may depend on the filter application to which the resonator will be put. For example, if the final resonator will have a full cylindrical shape, D and L may be selected so that it will be suitable for operation in a quad-mode. In this case, D and L may be selected so that the dual HEH11 and HEE11 of the full cylindrical dielectric resonator all resonate at a common resonant frequency, and the method 2100 ends after step 2110.
Alternatively, the final resonator may have a half-cut cylindrical form and D and L may be selected so that it will be suitable for operation in a dual-mode. In that case, D and L may be selected so that both ½HEH11 and ½HEE11 modes of the half-cut dielectric resonator resonate at a common resonant frequency. Alternatively, the final resonator may have a half-cut cylindrical form and D and L may be selected so that the half-cut dielectric resonator will be suitable for operation in a dual-band. In that case, D and L may be selected so that the ½HEH11 mode resonates at first resonant frequency and the ½HEE11 mode resonates at a second frequency different from the first resonant frequency. In these two alternatives, the method 2100 proceeds to step 2115.
Step 2115 comprises cutting the full cylindrical dielectric resonator lengthwise along a central axis to produce a half-cut dielectric resonator. The half-cut dielectric resonator will be of the diameter D and length L selected in previous step 2110, which may make the resonator suitable for operation in either a dual-mode or a dual-band. If no through-way slots are to be cut, method 2100 ends after step 2115. Alternatively, method 2100 proceeds to step 2120, which comprises cutting one or more through-way slots in the basic half-cut dielectric resonator filter.
Steps 2105, 2110 and 2120 may be performed using any suitable technique for cutting dielectric material. In some embodiments, steps 2105, 2110 and 2120 are performed using watercutting, which provides a highly accurate and cost-effective solution. As a result, no special molding or firing is required. Different cutting techniques however may be used in other embodiments. It should be appreciated, moreover, that modifications to method 2100 are possible, and that other methods of manufacturing a half-cut dielectric resonator exist and are within the scope of the disclosure. For example, half-cut dielectric resonators, and even slotted half-cut dielectric resonators, can be directly molded from a suitable high-permittivity dielectric substrate. Cutting a full cylinder into a half-cut cylinder, however, has the advantage of being both highly accurate and cost-effective.
Reference is now made to
It is evident that the rectangular dielectric resonator 2201, like the full cylindrical dielectric resonator 1, has 90 degree radial symmetry. Thus, like the full cylindrical dielectric resonator 1, the rectangular dielectric resonator 2201 can be sized for operation in a quad mode, wherein each of the four modes resonates at a common resonant frequency. Further, the rectangular dielectric resonator 2201 can also be sized for operation in a dual band, wherein each of two dual modes resonate at separate frequencies, one dual mode resonating a first resonant frequency and the other dual mode resonant at a second resonant frequency different from the first resonant frequency. One dual degenerate mode in the rectangular dielectric resonator 2201 will circulate parallel to the square surfaces 2202 (similar to the HEH mode in the full cylinder), and another dual degenerate mode will circulate orthogonal to the square surfaces (similar to the HEE mode in the full cylinder). Thus, again the D/L ratio can be sized so that the circulating paths of the E fields in these two dual modes are equal, in which case the modes will resonate at the same frequency. Alternatively, the D/L ratio can be sized for operation in a dual-band.
It should be appreciated that the above-described embodiments of coupling schemes (input-output, intra-cavity, inter-cavity), as well as filter/multiplexer realizations, though expressly described with reference to the full and half-cut cylindrical dielectric resonators, equally can be realized using rectangular dielectric resonators. Thus, filters and multiplexers realized using rectangular resonators are within the scope of the invention as well. It should further be appreciated that through-way slots may also similarly be cut into the rectangular dielectric resonators.
Numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the exemplary embodiments described herein. However, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that the exemplary embodiments described herein may be practiced in some instances without certain of these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures and components have not been described in detail so as not to obscure other aspects of the embodiments described herein. It will also be appreciated that some features and/or functions of the described exemplary embodiments are amenable to modification without departing from the principles of operation of the described exemplary embodiments. As the description provided herein is merely illustrative of the invention, other variants and modifications may still be within the invention as defined in the claims appended hereto. This description is not to be considered in any way as limiting the scope of the exemplary embodiments described herein.
This application is related to and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 61/135,289, filed Jul. 21, 2008 and entitled “Method of operation and construction of dual mode filters, dual band filters, and diplexer/multiplexer devices using full or half cut dielectric resonators,” the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61135289 | Jul 2008 | US |