Method of optimizing the joints between layers in modelling or prototyping involving layer decomposition, and the parts obtained

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7734367
  • Patent Number
    7,734,367
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, February 6, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 8, 2010
    14 years ago
Abstract
In a method for optimizing the joints between layers along portions of the layers which are flush with the surface of a part obtained by computer-aided modeling or prototyping involving layer decomposition, the connecting profile of two successive layers is mathematically and numerically defined using an algorithm in which the surface of the joint at the end zone adjacent to the flush portions is always substantially normal to the plane tangential to the surface of the part along the flush portions.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method for optimizing the joints between layers along portions of the layers which are flush with the surface of a part obtained by computer-aided modeling or prototyping involving layer decomposition, as well as the elementary layers obtained by the method, and the parts resulting from their assembly.


Rapid prototyping methods are themselves known. For example, European Patent No. 0 585 502-B1 discloses a prototype part which is produced using software for decomposing the part to be produced into elementary layers. The layers are assembled together, and the final assembly is then externally reworked, in particular, to remove any roughnesses or imperfections resulting from assembly.



FIGS. 3 and 4 schematically show an assembly of layers which illustrate the problem encountered. In the illustrated assembly of two layers (1, 2), a portion of the joint (3) becomes externally flush, at (4). It will be understood that the zone (5) of the layer (1) comprises little material at this location, which, by machining and polishing, can result in the removal of material from the zone (5) of the joint (3), as is schematically shown in FIG. 4, at (6). This results in an imperfect part, with an irregular surface, which is unsatisfactory for certain applications.


Such conventional joints also have other disadvantages including poor strength, poor resistance to machining, poor resistance to mechanical stresses during use (in particular, compressive stresses, whether they be of mechanical or fluidic origin), poor resistance to all assembly operations (bonding, welding, cementing), and possible deformations during machining, during handling and during assembly.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the present invention, these disadvantages are remedied by providing a method for optimizing the joints between layers along portions of the layers which are flush with the surface of a part obtained by computer-aided modeling or prototyping involving layer decomposition. In this method, the connecting profile of two successive layers is mathematically and numerically defined using an algorithm in which the surface of the joint at the end zone adjacent to the flush portions is always substantially normal to the plane tangential to the surface along the flush portions.


A further understanding of the present invention is provided in the description of alternative embodiments given below, with reference to the following drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A is a CAD representation of a part that is complicated to produce, with several possible alternative situations.



FIG. 1B is a CAD representation of a layer obtained with the method of the present invention, illustrating the layer in three dimensions.



FIGS. 2A and 2B represent a layer obtained in accordance with the present invention, seen from above in FIG. 2A, and in section in FIG. 2B.



FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate the problems potentially encountered with the layers of the prior art.



FIGS. 5 and 6 schematically illustrate the operating principle of the method of the present invention.



FIGS. 7, 8A, 8B and 8C illustrate simple alternative embodiments.



FIG. 9 illustrates an application to overhung and/or undercut profiles.



FIG. 10 illustrates a layer of the assembly shown in FIG. 9 in detail.



FIG. 11 illustrates a layer of an undercut assembly shown in FIG. 9, showing two alternatives.



FIGS. 12A to 12F illustrate application of the method of the present invention to a wall.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring first to FIG. 5 of the drawings, the essential parameters of a joint obtained in accordance with the method of the present invention include an angle (α) between the tangent and the plane of a layer, a length (a) of a portion (7) of the joint (3′) (corresponding to portions of the joint (3) between the adjacent layers shown in FIG. 3) which forms a profile connecting the two adjacent layers, an offset (b) of the plane of the layer, and a normal ({right arrow over (n)}) at the junction point (4′). In accordance with the present invention, the joint portion (7) is normal to the tangential plane (T) over a length (a). Note that if (a) is constant, (b) is f(α), and if α=π/2, b=0.


The above-discussed problems associated with a joint of this type are solved as a result; however, the layers obtained through such a calculation will be of variable thickness. In addition, the profile of the layer can vary all along the periphery, and the line of the joint (portions of which are formed at an incline in FIG. 5) is not necessarily in one and the same plane. For angles (α) close to π/2, it will also be necessary to suitably position the layers relative to one another, as explained below.


Referring to FIG. 6, and with all other things being equal for the embodiment of FIG. 5, the following are carried out. The amount of material at the joint is controlled (the objective sought). The position of the layer (in X,Y) is controlled by a centering insert (8). The position of the layer (in Z) is controlled by a positioning profile (8′). This also results in control and reinforcement of the assembly and of its mechanical strength.


The positioning profile is calculated relative to the external contour of the layer, and the angle (α) is able to vary along this contour. The profile can be obtained by micromilling, by milling the profile, or with a form cutter. In the latter case, the form will be constant on the periphery. The interlock is “hyperstatic”, and it is possible to provide clearances for assisting with certain types of contact.


Various alternatives will now be briefly described. For example, in FIG. 7, the interlock cannot be taken apart due to the presence of an undercut (β) on the positioning profile (9). Assembly is possible due to the elasticity of the materials.


Referring to FIGS. 8A, 8B and 8C, it is also possible to produce an exterior joint as a function of the degree of sealing required. This can be done to make a joint resist, as shown in FIG. 8A, or to add material as a supplement, which results in an external bead by deformation, as shown in FIG. 8B followed by FIG. 8C.



FIGS. 9, 10 and 11 show examples of applications to overhangs and undercuts. The detailed views of the layers shown in FIGS. 10 and 11 show that decompositions are possible for overhangs and undercuts, following the foregoing joint principle. It is also possible to choose the side of the interlock (upper or lower layer), and even their combination in space.


Finally, FIGS. 12A to 12F show various applications of the foregoing method to walls including applications without interlock (FIG. 12A); applications with external interlock only, and flat internal surfaces (FIG. 12B); applications with external and internal interlock, and flat internal surfaces (FIG. 12C); applications with external and internal interlock in the same plane (FIG. 12D); applications with simple normal decomposition (FIG. 12E); and applications with an offset double interlock (FIG. 12F).


From the foregoing, it will be noted that the digitization of the profile makes it possible to obtain a mathematically defined connection and nesting profile, which is functionally programmed. There is no limit to the profiles that can be obtained. The profile can be warped, and the joint surfaces can be complex and calculated.


It will be understood that the primary innovation herein lies in the principle of interlocking, the shapes being fully programmed and dependent on the cross-sectional area in which the nesting takes place. This can include flat surfaces, and can also include warped surfaces, as shown in FIGS. 1B, 2A and 2B. By using a geometric algorithm, the shape of the nesting joints is obtained by systematic computer calculation. Consequently, the shape of the joint depends on the layering plane and, therefore, cannot be known in advance.


At the interlocks, it is possible to provide functional portions of the induced functions in the final part. As a nonlimiting example, this can include regulating channels (cooling, heating, etc.) and/or channels for bringing assembly products and/or channels for the circulation of fluids.


The method of the present invention is applicable to all currently known fields involving layered parts designed by rapid prototyping and tooling, and all possible extensions that may later be developed by those skilled in the art for the decomposition of existing parts or for the design of new parts.

Claims
  • 1. A method for optimizing a joint between two successive layers of a part obtained by computer-aided modeling or prototyping involving layer decomposition, wherein the method comprises the steps of providing the joint with a connecting profile at end portions of the joint which are flush with surface portions of the part, and forming the connecting profile of the joint so that the connecting profile is always substantially normal to a plane tangential to the surface portions of the part at the end portions of the joint, and so that at least portions of the connecting profile form an angle relative to a plane defined by the joint, wherein the angle varies along the connecting profile of the joint.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 which further includes the step of mathematically and numerically defining the connecting profile of the joint of the two successive layers using an algorithm which places the connecting profile at the end portions of the joint which are flush with the surface portions of the part substantially normal to the plane tangential to the surface portions of the part at the end portions of the joint and so that the portions of the connecting profile form the angle relative to the plane defined by the joint.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the line of the connecting profile of the joint between the two successive layers varies along peripheral portions of the part.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 which further includes the step of forming an interlock on the joint between the two successive layers.
  • 5. The method of claim 4 which further includes the step of forming an undercut on a positioning profile associated with the joint, adjacent to the connecting profile, preventing separation of the two successive layers.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 which further includes the step of forming the joint with additional material located between the two successive layers.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the additional material forms a supplement portion on the joint.
  • 8. The method of claim 6 wherein the additional material forms a resist portion on the joint.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 which further includes the step of adapting the connecting profile to surface portions of the part having overhangs and undercuts.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 which further includes the step of controlling relative positioning of the two successive layers, including providing a centering insert between the two successive layers for controlling the positioning in (X,Y) and providing a positioning profile between the two successive layers for controlling the positioning in (Z).
  • 11. The method of claim 1 which further includes the step of forming a hyperstatic interlock on the joint.
  • 12. The method of claim 1wherein an included angle is formed between the plane tangential to the surface portions of the part and the plane defined by the joint, and wherein the included angle varies along the connecting profile of the joint.
  • 13. The method of claim 1 which further includes the step of forming the connecting profile at an incline to the plane defined by the joint.
  • 14. The method of claim 1 which further includes the step of providing the joint with an offset relative to the connecting profile at the end portions of the joint which are flush with the surface portions of the part.
  • 15. The method of claim 1 which further includes the step of forming at least portions of the connecting profile between the plane defined by the joint and the surface portions of the part at the angle relative to the plane defined by the joint.
  • 16. The method of claim 1wherein the surface portions of the part include contoured surface portions.
  • 17. A method for optimizing a joint between two successive, substantially parallel plates of a part obtained by computer-aided modeling or prototyping involving layer decomposition, wherein the method comprises the steps of providing the joint with a connecting profile at end portions of the joint which are flush with surface portions of the part, and forming the connecting profile of the joint so that the connecting profile is always substantially normal to a plane tangential to the surface portions of the part at the end portions of the joint, and so that at least portions of the connecting profile form an angle relative to a plane defined by the joint, wherein the angle varies along the connecting profile of the joint.
  • 18. The method of claim 17 which further includes the step of mathematically and numerically defining the connecting profile of the joint of the two successive plates using an algorithm which places the connecting profile at the end portions of the joint which are flush with the surface portions of the part substantially normal to the plane tangential to the surface portions of the part at the end portions of the joint and so that the portions of the connecting profile form the angle relative to the plane defined by the joint.
  • 19. The method of claim 17 wherein the line of the connecting profile of the joint between the two successive plates varies along peripheral portions of the part.
  • 20. The method of claim 17 which further includes the step of forming an interlock on the joint between the two successive plates.
  • 21. The method of claim 20 which further includes the step of forming an undercut on a positioning profile associated with the joint, adjacent to the connecting profile, preventing separation of the two successive plates.
  • 22. The method of claim 17 which further includes the step of forming the joint with additional material located between the two successive plates.
  • 23. The method of claim 22 wherein the additional material forms a supplement portion on the joint.
  • 24. The method of claim 22 wherein the additional material forms a resist portion on the joint.
  • 25. The method of claim 17 which further includes the step of adapting the connecting profile to surface portions of the part having overhangs and undercuts.
  • 26. The method of claim 17 which further includes the step of controlling relative positioning of the two successive plates, including providing a centering insert between the two successive plates for controlling the positioning in (X,Y) and providing a positioning profile between the two successive plates for controlling the positioning in (Z).
  • 27. The method of claim 17 which further includes the step of forming a hyperstatic interlock on the joint.
  • 28. The method of claim 17 wherein an included angle is formed between the plane tangential to the surface portions of the part and the plane defined by the joint, and wherein the included angle varies along the connecting profile of the joint.
  • 29. The method of claim 17 which further includes the step of forming the connecting profile at an incline to the plane defined by the joint.
  • 30. The method of claim 17 which further includes the step of providing the joint with an offset relative to the connecting profile at the end portions of the joint which are flush with the surface portions of the part.
  • 31. The method of claim 17 which further includes the step of forming at least portions of the connecting profile between the plane defined by the joint and the surface portions of the part at the angle relative to the plane defined by the joint.
  • 32. The method of claim 17 wherein the surface portions of the part include contoured surface portions.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/FR03/00367 2/6/2003 WO 00 8/5/2005
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2004/079463 9/16/2004 WO A
US Referenced Citations (67)
Number Name Date Kind
2428658 Falk et al. Oct 1947 A
2477060 Hudak Jul 1949 A
2479191 Williams et al. Aug 1949 A
2615111 Paquette et al. Oct 1952 A
3039146 Engel Jun 1962 A
3369272 Martin, Jr. et al. Feb 1968 A
3612387 Rathbun Oct 1971 A
3790152 Parsons Feb 1974 A
3909582 Bowen Sep 1975 A
3932923 DiMatteo Jan 1976 A
4001069 DiMatteo Jan 1977 A
4250727 Baril et al. Feb 1981 A
4338068 Suh et al. Jul 1982 A
4586690 Härtel et al. May 1986 A
4601652 Ando et al. Jul 1986 A
4675825 DeMenthon Jun 1987 A
4752352 Feygin Jun 1988 A
4778557 Schirmer Oct 1988 A
4781555 Cook Nov 1988 A
5015312 Kinzie May 1991 A
5031483 Weaver Jul 1991 A
5354414 Feygin Oct 1994 A
5514232 Burns May 1996 A
5663883 Thomas et al. Sep 1997 A
5725891 Reid, Jr. Mar 1998 A
5765137 Lee Jun 1998 A
5775402 Sachs et al. Jul 1998 A
5776409 Almquist et al. Jul 1998 A
5793015 Walczyk Aug 1998 A
5812402 Makiuchi et al. Sep 1998 A
5847958 Shaikh et al. Dec 1998 A
5943240 Nakamura Aug 1999 A
6021358 Sachs Feb 2000 A
6110409 Allanic et al. Aug 2000 A
6136132 Kinzie Oct 2000 A
6164115 Higuchi et al. Dec 2000 A
6276656 Baresich Aug 2001 B1
6284182 McNally Sep 2001 B1
6324438 Cormier et al. Nov 2001 B1
6344160 Holtzberg Feb 2002 B1
6358029 Niimi Mar 2002 B1
6405095 Jang et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409902 Yang et al. Jun 2002 B1
6454924 Jedrzejewski et al. Sep 2002 B2
6544024 Yim Apr 2003 B1
6554882 Zhou et al. Apr 2003 B1
6617601 Wiklund Sep 2003 B1
6627030 Yang et al. Sep 2003 B2
6627835 Chung et al. Sep 2003 B1
6688871 Lee et al. Feb 2004 B1
6719554 Hobson Apr 2004 B2
6728591 Hussey et al. Apr 2004 B1
6745446 Barlier Jun 2004 B1
6756309 Chen et al. Jun 2004 B1
6921068 Barlier et al. Jul 2005 B2
6991021 Ramirez et al. Jan 2006 B2
7003864 Dirscherl Feb 2006 B2
20020125613 Cominsky Sep 2002 A1
20020149137 Jang et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020162940 Frul et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020165634 Skszek Nov 2002 A1
20030006001 Yang et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030122277 Padovani Jul 2003 A1
20030141609 Jia Jul 2003 A1
20040173930 Himmer et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040173951 Hobson Sep 2004 A1
20040217497 Engwall et al. Nov 2004 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (27)
Number Date Country
3711470 Oct 1988 DE
4041105 Jun 1992 DE
0585502 Mar 1994 EP
0606627 Jul 1994 EP
0655317 May 1995 EP
0655668 May 1995 EP
0738583 Oct 1996 EP
0763417 Mar 1997 EP
0811457 Dec 1997 EP
0620946 Jun 1999 EP
2233137 Jan 1975 FR
2625135 Jun 1989 FR
2673302 Aug 1992 FR
2750064 Dec 1997 FR
2789187 Aug 2000 FR
2789188 Aug 2000 FR
2808896 Nov 2001 FR
2809040 Nov 2001 FR
2834803 Jul 2003 FR
2834803 Feb 2004 FR
2845492 Apr 2004 FR
2011814 Jul 1979 GB
WO9112120 Aug 1991 WO
WO9508416 Mar 1995 WO
WO9900234 Jan 1999 WO
WO 9911832 Mar 1999 WO
WO0222341 Mar 2002 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060142884 A1 Jun 2006 US