Patent Grant
11697219
The present disclosure relates to nonlinear lines of weakness for rolled products, and more specifically, relates to the method for producing a nonlinear line of weakness for rolled products.
Many articles and packages include or can include a strip of material that has a line of weakness having one or more perforations to aid in tearing the article or package. For example, articles can include wax paper, aluminum foil, disposable bags, and sanitary tissue products, such as toilet tissue, facial tissue, and paper towels manufactured in the form of a web. Sanitary tissue products include lines of weakness to permit tearing off discrete sheets, for example, as is well known in the art. Such products are commonly used in households, businesses, restaurants, shops, and the like.
Typically, a line of weakness consists of a straight perforation across the width of the web. Creating perforations at high speeds and long widths is very challenging. Small vibrations in the equipment can result in non-perforated areas and/or inconsistent quality in the perforation and/or additional wear on the equipment. Further, tight tolerances between equipment must be maintained. Generally, there are three ways to perforate webs: die cutting, laser cutting, and flex blade cutting. Die cutting is a compression or crush cut in which a knife contacts a hardened anvil roll or a male roll interacts with a female roll to create one or more perforations. Die cutting usually is associated with high replacement costs and low speeds. Further die cutting does not allow for accuracy at long widths or mismatched speed operation. Similarly, laser cutting is a high-powered method to perforate webs. Laser cutting is usually used on thicker substrates and on cuts requiring a high degree of accuracy. Still further, flex blade cutting is a cut created by shearing the web. Flex blade cutting requires at least one blade to flex against a relatively stationary blade or anvil during operation to cut the web. Relative to the above cutting methods, flex blade cutting is generally lower cost, can be performed at higher speeds, and can be run at mismatched speeds. In addition to the above, water jet, steam, and spark aperture cutting methods can also be used to create lines of weakness. These methods have been found to be incompatible with the product being manufactured and/or inadequate for high speed, low cost production of perforated webs.
For example, using two rotating rolls to create a shaped line of weakness can be complex and expensive. The two rotating rolls must be matched to come together at exactly the right moment in time. Stated another way, the male roll must be synchronized with the female roll. Further, creating perforations with a rotating male roll and a rotating female roll can require a greater force be imparted to the web to create the line of weakness. Finally, the equipment to create such a line of weakness is large and must operate at lower speeds to maintain proper matching of the rolls.
It has been found that consumers desire products that are usable and have a distinguishing feature over other products. Manufacturers of various products, for example sanitary tissue products, desire that consumers of such products be able to readily distinguish their products from similar products produced by competitors. One way a manufacturer can distinguish its products from other products is to impart physical characteristics into the web that differ from other manufacturers' products. A shaped perforation is one distinguishing characteristic that can be added to the product. The shape of the line of weakness would not only provide a way for consumers to distinguish a manufacture's product, but also communicate to consumers a perception of luxury, elegance, and softness and/or strength.
Further, manufactures desire a shaped perforation that consumers of such products can easily and readily interact with. Often a straight perforation on a sanitary tissue product, for example, can rest directly on the adjacent layer making it difficult to see the end of the sheet. This can make it difficult for a user to locate, grasp, and/or dispense the product. A straight perforation can allow for only a single plane of the product on which a user can grasp for dispensing.
However, producing a web with a shaped perforation adds more complexity to the manufacturing process. As previously stated, tight tolerances and minimal to no vibration are required in manufacturing a line of weakness at the high speeds necessary for commercial viability. Thus, adding a shape to the anvil and/or the blade can increase the risk of introducing processing complexities and complications into commercial manufacturing operations for a perforated web.
Still further, as previously stated, consumers desire a product that they can easily and readily interact with. A shaped perforation adds a degree of complexity to the processing capability of manufactures to provide a product that tears at least as well as a currently marketed product having a straight line of weakness. Further, imparting a shaped line of weakness in the product can lead to unequal perforations and/or inconsistency in tearing.
Accordingly, there is a continuing unmet need for an improved perforating apparatus to manufacture a web with a shaped line of weakness.
Accordingly, there is a continuing unmet need for an improved method to manufacture a web with a shaped line of weakness.
Still further, there is a continuing unmet need for a sanitary tissue product having individual sheets separated by shaped lines of weakness, and which allows consumers to easily and readily interact with the product. More specifically, there is a continuing unmet need for a sanitary tissue product that allows the consumer to grasp the first, exposed sheet of the product readily and easily for dispensing and use.
The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this disclosure, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the disclosure itself will be better understood by reference to the following description of non-limiting embodiments of the disclosure taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Various non-limiting embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described to provide an overall understanding of the principles of the structure, function, manufacture, and use of a web comprising a shaped line of weakness. The features illustrated or described in connection with one non-limiting embodiment can be combined with the features of other non-limiting embodiments. Such modifications and variations are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure.
“Fibrous structure” as used herein means a structure that comprises one or more fibrous elements. In one example, a fibrous structure according to the present disclosure means an association of fibrous elements that together form a structure capable of performing a function. A nonlimiting example of a fibrous structure of the present disclosure is an absorbent paper product, which can be a sanitary tissue product such as a paper towel, bath tissue, or other rolled, absorbent paper product.
Non-limiting examples of processes for making fibrous structures include known wet-laid papermaking processes, air-laid papermaking processes, and wet, solution, and dry filament spinning processes, for example meltblowing and spunbonding spinning processes, that are typically referred to as nonwoven processes. Such processes can comprise the steps of preparing a fiber composition in the form of a suspension in a medium, either wet, more specifically aqueous medium, or dry, more specifically gaseous, i.e. with air as medium. The aqueous medium used for wet-laid processes is oftentimes referred to as fiber slurry. The fibrous suspension is then used to deposit a plurality of fibers onto a forming wire or belt such that an embryonic fibrous structure is formed, after which drying and/or bonding the fibers together results in a fibrous structure. Further processing the fibrous structure can be carried out such that a finished fibrous structure is formed. For example, in typical papermaking processes, the finished fibrous structure is the fibrous structure that is wound on the reel at the end of papermaking and can subsequently be converted into a finished product (e.g., a sanitary tissue product).
“Fibrous element” as used herein means an elongate particulate having a length greatly exceeding its average diameter, i.e. a length to average diameter ratio of at least about 10. A fibrous element may be a filament or a fiber. In one example, the fibrous element is a single fibrous element rather than a yarn comprising a plurality of fibrous elements.
The fibrous elements of the present disclosure may be spun from polymer melt compositions via suitable spinning operations, such as meltblowing and/or spunbonding and/or they may be obtained from natural sources such as vegetative sources, for example trees.
The fibrous elements of the present disclosure may be monocomponent and/or multicomponent. For example, the fibrous elements may comprise bicomponent fibers and/or filaments. The bicomponent fibers and/or filaments may be in any form, such as side-by-side, core and sheath, islands-in-the-sea and the like.
“Filament” as used herein means an elongate particulate as described above that exhibits a length of greater than or equal to 5.08 cm (2 in.) and/or greater than or equal to 7.62 cm (3 in.) and/or greater than or equal to 10.16 cm (4 in.) and/or greater than or equal to 15.24 cm (6 in.).
Filaments are typically considered continuous or substantially continuous in nature. Filaments are relatively longer than fibers. Non-limiting examples of filaments include meltblown and/or spunbond filaments. Non-limiting examples of polymers that can be spun into filaments include natural polymers, such as starch, starch derivatives, cellulose, such as rayon and/or lyocell, and cellulose derivatives, hemicellulose, hemicellulose derivatives, and synthetic polymers including, but not limited to polyvinyl alcohol, thermoplastic polymer, such as polyesters, nylons, polyolefins such as polypropylene filaments, polyethylene filaments, and biodegradable thermoplastic fibers such as polylactic acid filaments, polyhydroxyalkanoate filaments, polyesteramide filaments and polycaprolactone filaments.
“Fiber” as used herein means an elongate particulate as described above that exhibits a length of less than 5.08 cm (2 in.) and/or less than 3.81 cm (1.5 in.) and/or less than 2.54 cm (1 in.). A fiber can be elongate physical structure having an apparent length greatly exceeding its apparent diameter (i.e., a length to diameter ratio of at least about 10.) Fibers having a non-circular cross-section and/or tubular shape are common; the “diameter” in this case can be considered to be the diameter of a circle having a cross-sectional area equal to the cross-sectional area of the fiber.
Fibers are typically considered discontinuous in nature. Non-limiting examples of fibers include pulp fibers, such as wood pulp fibers, and synthetic staple fibers such as polypropylene, polyethylene, polyester, copolymers thereof, rayon, glass fibers and polyvinyl alcohol fibers.
Staple fibers may be produced by spinning a filament tow and then cutting the tow into segments of less than 5.08 cm (2 in.) thus producing fibers.
In one example of the present disclosure, a fiber may be a naturally occurring fiber, which means it is obtained from a naturally occurring source, such as a vegetative source, for example a tree and/or other plant. Such fibers are typically used in papermaking and are oftentimes referred to as papermaking fibers. Papermaking fibers useful in the present disclosure include cellulosic fibers commonly known as wood pulp fibers. Applicable wood pulps include chemical pulps, such as Kraft, sulfite, and sulfate pulps, as well as mechanical pulps including, for example, groundwood, thermomechanical pulp and chemically modified thermomechanical pulp. Chemical pulps, however, may be preferred since they impart a superior tactile sense of softness to fibrous structures made therefrom. Pulps derived from both deciduous trees (hereinafter, also referred to as “hardwood”) and coniferous trees (hereinafter, also referred to as “softwood”) may be utilized. The hardwood and softwood fibers can be blended, or alternatively, can be deposited in layers to provide a stratified web. Also applicable to the present disclosure are fibers derived from recycled paper, which may contain any or all of the above categories of fibers as well as other non-fibrous polymers such as fillers, softening agents, wet and dry strength agents, and adhesives used to facilitate the original papermaking.
In addition to the various wood pulp fibers, other cellulosic fibers such as cotton linters, rayon, lyocell, and bagasse fibers can be used in the fibrous structures of the present disclosure.
“Sanitary tissue product” as used herein means one or more finished fibrous structures, that is useful as a wiping implement for post-urinary and post-bowel movement cleaning (e.g., toilet tissue, also referred to as bath tissue, and wet wipes), for otorhinolaryngological discharges (e.g., facial tissue), and multi-functional absorbent and cleaning and drying uses (e.g., paper towels, shop towels). The sanitary tissue products can be embossed or not embossed and creped or uncreped.
In one example, sanitary tissue products rolled about a fibrous core of the present disclosure can have a basis weight between about 10 g/m2 to about 160 g/m2 or from about 20 g/m2 to about 150 g/m2 or from about 35 g/m2 to about 120 g/m2 or from about 55 to 100 g/m2, specifically reciting all 0.1 g/m2 increments within the recited ranges. In addition, the sanitary tissue products can have a basis weight between about 40 g/m2 to about 140 g/m2 and/or from about 50 g/m2 to about 120 g/m2 and/or from about 55 g/m2 to about 105 g/m2 and/or from about 60 to 100 g/m2, specifically reciting all 0.1 g/m2 increments within the recited ranges. Other basis weights for other materials, such as wrapping paper and aluminum foil, are also within the scope of the present disclosure.
“Basis Weight” as used herein is the weight per unit area of a sample reported in lbs/3000 ft2 or g/m2. Basis weight can be measured by preparing one or more samples to create a total area (i.e., flat, in the material's non-cylindrical form) of at least 100 in2 (accurate to +/−0.1 in2) and weighing the sample(s) on a top loading calibrated balance with a resolution of 0.001 g or smaller. The balance is protected from air drafts and other disturbances using a draft shield. Weights are recorded when the readings on the balance become constant. The total weight (lbs or g) is calculated and the total area of the samples (ft2 or m2) is measured. The basis weight in units of lbs/3,000 ft2 is calculated by dividing the total weight (lbs) by the total area of the samples (ft2) and multiplying by 3000. The basis weight in units of g/m2 is calculated by dividing the total weight (g) by the total area of the samples (m2).
“Density” as used herein is calculated as the quotient of the Basis Weight expressed in grams per square meter divided by the Caliper expressed in microns. The resulting Density is expressed as grams per cubic centimeter (g/cm3 or g/cc). Sanitary tissue products of the present disclosure can have a density of greater than about 0.05 g/cm3 and/or greater than 0.06 g/cm3 and/or greater than 0.07 g/cm3 and/or less than 0.10 g/cm3 and/or less than 0.09 g/cm3 and/or less than 0.08 g/cm3 and/or less than 0.60 g/cm3 and/or less than 0.30 g/cm3 and/or less than 0.20 g/cm3 and/or less than 0.15 g/cm3 and/or less than 0.10 g/cm3 and/or less than 0.07 g/cm3 and/or less than 0.05 g/cm3 and/or from about 0.01 g/cm3 to about 0.20 g/cm3 and/or from about 0.02 g/cm3 to about 0.15 g/cm3 and/or from about 0.02 g/cm3 to about 0.10 g/cm3.
“Ply” as used herein means an individual, integral fibrous structure.
“Plies” as used herein means two or more individual, integral fibrous structures disposed in a substantially contiguous, face-to-face relationship with one another, forming a multi-ply fibrous structure and/or multi-ply sanitary tissue product. It is also contemplated that an individual, integral fibrous structure can effectively form a multi-ply fibrous structure, for example, by being folded on itself.
“Rolled product(s)” as used herein include plastics, fibrous structures, paper, sanitary tissue products, paperboard, polymeric materials, aluminum foils, and/or films that are in the form of a web and can be wound about a core. For example, the sanitary tissue product can be convolutedly wound upon itself about a core or without a core to form a sanitary tissue product roll or can be in the form of discrete sheets, as is commonly known for toilet tissue and paper towels.
“Machine Direction,” MD, as used herein is the direction of manufacture for a perforated web. The machine direction can be the direction in which a web is fed through a perforating apparatus that can comprise a rotating cylinder and support, as discussed below in one embodiment. The machine direction can be the direction in which web travels as it passes through a blade and an anvil of a perforating apparatus.
“Cross Machine Direction,” CD as used herein is the direction substantially perpendicular to the machine direction. The cross machine direction can be substantially perpendicular to the direction in which a web is fed through a cylinder and lower support in one embodiment. The cross machine direction can be the direction substantially perpendicular to the direction in which web travels as it passes through a blade and an anvil.
The dimensions and values disclosed herein are not to be understood as being strictly limited to the exact numerical values recited. Instead, unless otherwise specified, each such dimension is intended to mean both the recited value and a functionally equivalent range surrounding that value. For example, a dimension disclosed as “40 mm” is intended to mean “about 40 mm.”
Referring to
The cylinder 12 can comprise an anvil. In one example embodiment, the anvil 12 can be disposed on the outer surface 30 of the cylinder 12. In another example embodiment, the anvil 16 can be disposed on an anvil insert 29 that can be removably attached to the cylinder 12. The anvil insert 29 can be magnetically attached to the outer surface 30 of the cylinder 12. In another embodiment, the anvil insert 29 can be chemically attached, such as by glue, or mechanically attached, such as by clamping, bolting, or otherwise joining to the outer surface 30 of the cylinder 12. Opposite the cylinder 12, the support 18 can comprise a blade 20. The blade 20 can be disposed on the support 18. By “disposed” is meant the blade can be attached, removably attached, clamped, bolted, or otherwise held by the support 18 in a stable operative position with respect to the cylinder 12.
In another example embodiment, the support 18 can comprise a blade holder 27. The blade 20 can be disposed on the blade holder 27 in such a manner as to maintain sufficient stability when in contacting engagement with the anvil 16. Further, a clamp 31, shown in
The cylinder 12 is movable such that the cylinder 12 can operatively engage with the support 18. Operative engagement means the support 18 can be arranged in relationship to the cylinder 12 such that the blade 20 can make contact with the anvil 16 as it rotates past the blade 20; the contact sufficient to make one or more perforations 22 in a web 14. In one embodiment, the contact between the anvil 16 and the blade 20 is a shearing action. Thus, in one embodiment, the perforating apparatus can be a shear-cutting device. The blade 20 can be disposed on the support 18 so as to cooperate in contacting relationship with the anvil 20 disposed on the cylinder 12 to impart a line of weakness 21 comprising one or more perforations 22 and one or more bond areas 23 in the web 14. The bond areas 23 are the portion of the web between two adjacent perforations. The inventors found a unique and surprising result from shaping the element disposed on the rotating cylinder 12. In one embodiment, the shaped element can comprise the anvil 16. The resulting perforation on the sheet takes on the same or a similar shape as the shaped rotating element, which, in one embodiment is a shaped anvil 16. The same result does not occur if the shape is not on the rotating roll.
As previously stated, the line of weakness 21 comprising perforations 22 and bond areas 23 can be the shape of the anvil 16. The characteristics of the one or more perforations 22 and bond areas 23 can be due, in part, to the interaction point 26. Referring to
As stated above, the anvil 16 and the blade 20 cooperate in contacting relationship. Generally, the anvil 16 can be a substantially hardened steel surface such that there is little to no deflection of the anvil 16 as it cooperates with the blade 20. By contrast, as the blade 20 cooperates with the anvil 16, the blade 20 can deflect against the anvil 16 creating a line of weakness 21 in the web 14. In one embodiment, the clamp 31 can be designed such that it allows the blade 20 to flex as it interacts with the anvil 16. More specifically, as shown in
Referring to
The cylinder 12 can be a solid or substantially hollow cylindrical shaped device having a hardened outer surface 30. The cylinder 12 can be formed of metal, such as steel, or some other material known to those skilled in the art to be suitable for use in forming perforations in a web. The outer surface 30 can be substantially smooth apart from or including the anvil 16. The cylinder has a length L, as shown in
The cylinder 12 can comprise at least one anvil 16 disposed on the outer surface 30, as illustrated in
A removably attached anvil 16 can aid in quickly changing out dull, worn, and/or damaged parts. Further, a removably attached anvil 16 can allow for easily changing from a straight perforation system to a shaped perforation system. In one example embodiment, the cylinder 12 can comprise an anvil 16 comprised of one or more anvil segments 17 positioned end-to-end along the length L of the cylinder 12, as shown in
In addition to one or more anvil segments 17 being disposed end to end to extend along the length L of the cylinder 12, one or more anvils 16 (each of which can comprise individual anvil segments 17 or a continuous single-piece anvil) can be spaced radially about the outer surface 30, as shown in
Successive lines of weakness 21 imparted to the web 14 can be spaced at a distance equal to about the circumference of the cylinder 12 divided by the number of anvils 16 spaced equidistant to one another. Stated another way, the spacing of lines of weakness 21 on the web 14 can be about equal to the spacing between each anvil 16 disposed on the outer surface 30 of the cylinder 12. For example, a cylinder 12 comprising nine rows of anvils 16 disposed radially about the outer surface 30 and a desired sheet length of about four inches, the cylinder 12 can have a diameter of about 11.5 inches and a circumference of about 36 inches. In an alternative example embodiment, the distance between one or more anvils 16 disposed about the outer surface 30 can be unequal and, thus, the line of weakness 21 on the web 14 can also spaced at unequal distances one from another, being about equal to the distance between adjacent anvils 16 disposed about the cylinder 12. One of ordinary skill in the art would understand that for the line of weakness 21 on the web 14 to be equal to the distance between the one or more anvils 16, the speed of the web 14 would substantially match the rotational speed of the cylinder 12 and the longitudinal cylinder axis 24 would be substantially perpendicular to the machine direction of the web 14. Likewise, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand that by over-speeding or under-speeding the web 14, the MD spacing between the lines of weakness 21 can be varied with respect to the spacing between anvils 16 on cylinder 12. In another embodiment, the cylinder 12 can be both over-sped and under-sped to produce variable sheet lengths in the web 14. Thus, the cylinder can be run at a constant over-speed, a constant under-speed or variable speeds, both over-speed and under-speed.
The anvil 16 can have any substantially continuous, non-linear shape (also referred to as a curvilinear shape), for example, a sinusoidal shape or saw-tooth shape, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
Referring to
The wavelength 34 and amplitude 32 can be selected to minimize or avoid chatter in the perforating apparatus 10. Chatter is the vibration imparted to the perforating apparatus 10 as the blade 20 cooperates in contacting relationship with the anvil 16 at operating speeds. Chatter can be avoided or reduced by minimizing the number of simultaneous interaction points 26 between the anvil 16 and the blade 20. The continuous line segment shape of the anvil 16 can allow for a reduction in the number of interaction points 26 between the anvil 16 and the blade 20. For example, in one embodiment, the anvil 16 can comprise a wave-form shape, as shown in
One of ordinary skill in the art would understand that the anvil 16 can be designed to impart a desired shape of a line of weakness 21 in the absorbent tissue product. In one embodiment, the anvil 16 can be designed such that the line of weakness 21 on a web 14, such as absorbent sheet product (also referred to as a sanitary tissue product), can have a wavelength 34 from about 10% of the sheet width to about 200% of the sheet width and an amplitude 32 of less than about 50% of the distance between adjacent lines of weakness 21. For example, in one embodiment, the absorbent sheet product can have a width of about 3.5 inches and the distance of the wavelength 34 can be about 50% of the sheet width, which is about 1.75 inches. Thus, the line of weakness 21 imparted to the absorbent sheet product can have at least one wavelength 34. For example, an absorbent sheet product having a distance between adjacent lines of weakness 21 of about 4 inches can comprise a line of weakness 21 having an amplitude 32 of about 2 inches.
Still further, chatter can be reduced by nesting one or more anvils 16 disposed on the outer surface 30 of the cylinder 12 (not shown). By nesting one or more anvils 16 the blade 20 can remain in constant contact with the anvil 16. Having the blade 20 in constant engagement with the anvil 16 can allow the cylinder 12 to remain balanced and stabilized and, thus, reduce chatter in the perforating apparatus 10. Additionally, other ways to reduce chatter include, for example, positioning the anvil 16 so that it is helixed about the cylinder 12. As illustrated in
In one example embodiment, each perforation 22 in the line of weakness 21 can be formed one at a time as the anvil 16 interacts with the straight blade 20 at a single location at a given moment in time. By helically mounting the anvil 16, the blade 20 operatively engages the anvil 16 at minimal interaction points 26. For example, the blade 20 can engage the helical anvil 16 such that the perforations 22 are created by a consecutive series of minimized interaction points 26 across the entire web 14 in a zipper-like manner. Further, helically mounting the anvil 16 can allow the anvil 16 to be in constant engagement with the blade 20. Stated another way, by helically mounting one or more anvils 16 about the outer surface 30 of by the cylinder 12 a portion or point of the anvil 16 can always be in contact with a portion or point of the blade 20, as illustrated in
However, helically mounting the anvil 16 about the cylinder 12 and running the web 14 at matched speed to the cylinder 12, can result in the line of weakness 21 being at an angle to the CD, as illustrated in
The perforating apparatus 10 can also be skewed with respect to the web 14 to correct for an angle in the line of weakness 21 with respect to the CD, as shown in
Where the web 14 is skewed with respect to the perforating apparatus 10, the web 14 may experience a force vector that drives the web 14 off of a desired path as the web 14 is exiting the perforating apparatus 10. In other words, the web 14 may travel at an angle out of the perforating apparatus 10 as opposed to following a desirable straight line path 15. Wrapping the web 14 about one or more idlers may reduce the web 14 likelihood to travel at an undesirable angle. In one nonlimiting example, an idler is placed upstream of the cylinder 12 and/or upstream of blade 20. In another nonlimiting example, an idler is placed downstream of the cylinder 12 and/or downstream of the blade 20. The idler may be wrapped with sandpaper, such as 60-grit sandpaper or 120-grit sandpaper. In another embodiment, the idler can be provided with a means to increase the coefficient of friction on its surface.
Further to the above, the characteristics of the line of weakness 21 on the web 14 can be changed by over-speeding or under-speeding the web 14 and/or the cylinder 12 comprising the shaped anvil 16. As illustrated in
One of ordinary skill in the art would understand that by over-speeding the cylinder 12 with respect to the web 14, the line of weakness 21 would again become distorted as compared to the shape of the anvil 16. For example, by over-speeding the cylinder 12 with respect to the web 14, the amplitude 32 of the line of weakness 21 will become shorter than the amplitude of the shaped anvil 16. Thus, the design of the shaped anvil 16 disposed on the cylinder 12 should be taken into consideration to produce the desired line of weakness 21 when over-speeding or under-speeding the web 14 or the cylinder 12.
Further, the web 14 can be perforated while under tension in the machine direction MD. The tension on the web 14 in the MD results in the web 14 becoming elongated in the MD and narrower in the cross machine direction CD. This phenomena of elongation in the MD and narrowing in the CD is referred to as neck-down. For a web 14 under tension in the MD and narrowed in the CD as it is passed through the perforating apparatus 10, the line of weakness 21 imparted to the web 14 on the final rolled absorbent product can be different than the profile of the shaped anvil 16 disposed on the rotating cylinder 12 and/or the shaped line of weakness 21 imparted to the web 14 just after passing through the perforating apparatus 10. Once the web 14 is wound onto a final rolled absorbent product and is no longer under the same tension as when perforated, the web 14 can return to its original, non-tensioned dimensions. More specifically, the web 14 in the MD can contract back and the web 14 in the CD can become wider. The shaped line of weakness 21 imparted to the web 14 undergoes a similar transformation once the tension in the web 14 is lessened or removed. In one example embodiment, a curvilinear line of weakness 21 on the final rolled absorbent product, which was perforated under tension and is now no longer under tension, can have an amplitude that is less than the amplitude imparted when the web 14 was under tension just after passing through the perforating apparatus 10, and an increased wavelength distance as compared to the distance of the wavelength of the web 14 under tension after just passing through the perforating apparatus 10. Thus, the shape of the anvil 16 disposed on the rotating cylinder 12 can be designed to account for the tension, if any, in the web 14 so as to produce the desired curvilinear shape in the line of weakness 21 of the final rolled absorbent product.
In yet another embodiment, the anvil 16 can be smooth-edged or notched, as shown in
As discussed above, the support 18, as shown in
One or more blades 20 can be disposed around the support surface 40, as shown in
Still referring to
In one embodiment, the blade 20 can be in a cantilevered position. The cantilevered position can allow for the blade 20 to flex at or near its distal end. More specifically, as the anvil 16 cooperates with the blade 20, the distal end of the perforating blade flexes against the anvil 16 to create the line of weakness 21 in the web 14. The blade 20 can be made of tungsten carbide or other suitable material and is commercially available from The Kinetic Company. The blade 20 can be coated with materials to enhance its strength and wear resistance (also referred to as machine life). For example, in one embodiment, the blade 20 can be subject to plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition to deposit a thin film of material on the surface of the blade 20. Materials that can be used to prolong the machine life of the blade 20 can include titanium oxide and ceramic coatings. Generally, the anvil 16 is a substantially hardened surface that does not flex or minimally flexes when in contacting engagement with the blade 20.
As previously disclosed, the support 18 can be in any orientation with respect to the cylinder 12 that allows the blade 20 and anvil 16 to cooperate in contacting relationship to impart one or more perforations 22 onto the web 14, as shown in
As illustrated in
Referring now to
Therefore, in one embodiment, a perforating apparatus 10 can be designed to make a line of weakness 21 comprising one or more perforations 22 having a substantially uniform perforation length PL. Alternatively, or in addition to uniform perforation lengths PL, the space between each perforation 22, the bond area 23 can have a non-perforation length NP, where the NP can be substantially uniform. As previously disclosed with respect to
Referring to
Each tooth length TL can be individually predetermined such that its projected contacting relationship onto the anvil 16 delimits a length of the anvil 16 substantially equal to a desired perforation length PL in the web 14. Each recessed portion length RL is individually predetermined such that its projected relationship with respect to the anvil 16 delimits a length of the anvil 16 substantially equal to a desired bond area having non-perforated length NP in the web 14. For example, each tooth length TL and recessed portion length RL can be designed such that the lines of weakness 21 in the web 14 comprises perforations 22 that are longer at the edge of the web 14 compared to the perforations toward the middle of the web 14, or bond areas 23 that are shorter near the edge compared to the bond areas toward the middle of the web 14.
Referring now to
Further to the above, in one embodiment, the perforating apparatus 10 can comprise a shaped anvil 16, disposed on the rotating cylinder 12, comprising a plurality of teeth 36 and one or more recessed portions 38, and a blade 20 having a substantially smooth edge, not shown. The perforating apparatus 10 imparts a line of weakness 21 onto the web 14. The line of weakness 21 will have perforations 22 and bond areas 23 that directly correspond to the teeth 36 and recessed portions 38 of the notched, shaped anvil 16. Stated another way, when the shaped anvil 16 is notched, having one or more recessed portions 38 and one or more teeth 36, the location of the recessed portions 38 will substantially correspond to the location of bond areas 23 on the line of weakness 21 and the location of the teeth 36 will substantially correspond to the location of the perforations 22 on the line of weakness 21. Thus, when the shaped anvil 16 is notched, the design of the recessed portions 38 and teeth 36 should be done in a manner to directly reflect the desired characteristics of the line of weakness 21.
An example embodiment of the web 14 produced by the present disclosure is shown in
As previously stated, each of the plurality of perforations has a perforation length and each of the bond areas has a non-perforation length. In one example embodiment at least two of the perforation lengths are substantially equal. In another example embodiment, at least two of the non-perforation lengths are substantially equal. In yet another example embodiment at least two of the non-perforation lengths are substantially unequal and at least two of the perforation lengths are substantially unequal. In still another example embodiment, the curvilinear line of weakness 21 can comprise at least one wavelength 34, and the one or more perforations 22 and bond areas 23 can be imparted to the web 14 such that the perforation lengths PL near the edge of the web 14 are longer than the perforation lengths PL near the middle of the web 14 and/or the non-perforation lengths NP are shorter near the edge of the web 14 and longer near the middle of the web 14. Similarly, the perforations 22 and bond area 23 can be imparted to the web 14 such that the perforation lengths PL are substantially the same at the crest and trough of the wavelength 34 and different between the crest and the trough of the wavelength 34. Further, the perforations 22 and bond area 23 can be imparted to the web 14 such that the non-perforation lengths PL are substantially the same length at the crest and trough of the wavelength 34 and a different length between the crest and the trough of the wavelength 34.
A curvilinear line of weakness 21 can allow manufacturers to create a product that consumers can more easily and readily interact with. For example, a notched blade 20 or notched anvil 16 can be designed such that a shaped line of weakness 21 can tear more easily than, or at least as easy as, a straight line of weakness 21. Generally, the ease with which an absorbent sheet product is torn at the line of weakness is directly associated with the tensile strength of the line of weakness. It is known that the lower the perforation tensile strength, the easier the absorbent sheet product will separate at the line of weakness. The following data, shown in Table 1 below, illustrates the difference in the perforation tensile strength required to tear a shaped, also referred to as curvilinear or nonlinear, line of weakness 21 as compared to that of a straight, also referred to as linear, line of weakness across a full sheet of absorbent tissue product.
The data shown in Table 1 was gathered using the Tensile Strength Test Method as outline below. Generally, the data shows that the peak tensile strength for a shaped line of weakness is less than the peak tensile strength for a straight line of weakness. The peak tensile strength is the maximum force reached along the line of weakness upon completely tearing the line of weakness. As evidenced by Table 1 below, generally, the peak tensile strength of a shaped line of weakness is from about 1% to about 40% less than the peak tensile strength of a straight line of weakness imparted to the web 14 under similar manufacturing conditions, such as blade tooth length and recessed portion length. Stated another way, a shaped line of weakness imparted by the apparatus and method of the present disclosure can have a peak tensile strength that is generally at least about one percent and/or at least about 5% and/or at least about 10% and/or at least about 20% less than the peak tensile strength of a straight line of weakness.
Similar to the above, Table 1 also illustrates that the failure TEA (total energy absorbed) is generally less for a shaped line of weakness as compared to a straight line of weakness. The failure TEA is the area under the curve between the point of initial tensioning of the sanitary tissue product to the point at which the shaped line of weakness has failed. The failure point of the shaped line of weakness is designated by the tension falling below 5% of the peak load. As evidenced in Table 1, generally, the failure TEA of the shaped line of weakness is from about 1% to about 50% and/or about from about 1% to about 30% and/or about 1% to about 20% less than the failure TEA of the straight line of weakness.
Further, a shaped line of weakness 21 on a sanitary tissue paper product, for example, allows consumers to more easily grasp and dispense the exposed sheet of the product due to the shaped line of weakness 21 creating a series of tabs or a visually identifiable edge. Still further, the shaped line of weakness 21 can allow consumers to readily distinguish a product from other manufacturer's products by having a visually distinctive perforation, such as one that complements an emboss or print pattern.
In another example embodiment, the cylinder 12 can comprise a shaped blade 20 and the support 18 can comprise a straight, linear anvil 16, not shown. Likewise, in another example embodiment, the cylinder 12 can comprise a shaped blade 20 and the support 18 can comprise a straight, linear blade. The above description applies to either of the recited configurations.
Tensile Strength Test Method
Elongation, Tensile Strength, TEA and Tangent Modulus are measured by or calculated from data generated by a constant rate of extension tensile tester with computer interface (a suitable instrument is the EJA Vantage from the Thwing-Albert Instrument Co. Wet Berlin, N.J.) using a load cell for which the forces measured are within 10% to 90% of the limit of the load cell. Both the movable (upper) and stationary (lower) pneumatic jaws are fitted with smooth stainless steel faced grips, with a design suitable for testing the full width of one sheet material. For example, the Thwing-Albert item #734K grips are suitable for testing a sheet having about a four inch width. An air pressure of about 60 psi is supplied to the jaws.
Unless otherwise specified, all tests described herein, including those described in the detailed description, are conducted on samples that have been conditioned in a conditioned room at a temperature of 73° F.±2° F. (23° C.±1° C.) and a relative humidity of 50% (±2%) for 2 hours prior to the test. All tests are conducted in such conditioned room(s). All plastic and paper board packaging materials must be carefully removed from the paper samples prior to testing. If the sample is in roll form, remove at least the leading five sheets by unwinding and tearing off via the closest line of weakness, and discard before testing the sample. Do not test sheet samples with defects such as perforation skips, wrinkles, tears, incomplete perforations, holes, etc.
A full finished product width sheet sample of a paper towel or bath tissue product is cut so that a perforation line passes across the sheet parallel to each cut in the width dimension. More specifically, take two adjacent sheets separated by a line of weakness (comprising one or more perforations), and cut a test sample to include at least a portion of the two tissue sheets. The cuts should be made across the width of the sheet generally parallel to the line of perforation and equally about the line of perforation. For example, the first cut is made at least two inches above the line of weakness comprising perforations and another cut is made on the other side of the line of weakness at least two inches from the line of weakness comprising perforations. At all times the sample should be handled in such a manner that perforations are not damaged or weakened. The prepared sample is placed in the grips so that no part of the line of weakness is touching or inside the clamped grip faces. Further, the line of weakness should be generally parallel to the grip. Stated another way, if an imaginary line were drawn across the width of the sheet connecting the two points at which the line of weakness crosses the edge of the sheet, the imaginary line should be generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the grips (i.e., perpendicular to the direction of elongation).
Program the tensile tester to perform an extension test, collecting force and extension data at an acquisition rate of 20 Hz as the crosshead raises at a rate of 4.00 in/min (10.16 cm/min) until the specimen breaks (i.e., when the test specimen is physically separated into two parts). The break sensitivity is set to 98%, i.e., the test is terminated when the measured force drops to ≤2% of the maximum peak force, after which the crosshead is returned to its original position.
Set the gage length to 2.0 inches. Zero the crosshead position and load cell. Insert the sheet sample into the upper and lower open grips such that at least 0.5 inches of sheet length is contained each grip. Verify sheet sample is properly aligned, as previously discussed, and then close lower and upper grips. The sheet sample should be under enough tension to eliminate any slack, but less than 5 g of force measured on the load cell. Start the tensile tester and data collection.
The location of failure (break) should be the line of weakness. Each sample sheet should break completely at the line of weakness. The peak force to tear the line of weakness is reported in grams. If the location of the failure (break) is not the line of weakness, disregard the data and repeat the test with another sheet sample. Note, the output result is for the entire sheet sample and therefore does not need to be normalized.
Adjusted Gage Length is calculated as the extension measured at 5 g of force (in) added to the original gage length (in).
Peak Tensile is calculated as the force at the maximum or peak force. The result is reported in units of g/in, to the nearest 1 g/in. Note the output results are for the entire sheet sample width and is not normalized.
Failure Total Energy Absorption (Fail_TEA) is calculated as the area under the force curve integrated from zero extension to the extension at the “failure” point (g*in), divided by the adjusted Gage Length (in). The failure point is defined here as the extension when the tension force falls to 5% of the maximum peak force. This is reported with units of g*in/in to the nearest 1 g*in/in. Again, note that the output results are for the entire sheet sample width.
Repeat the above mentioned steps for each sample sheet. Four sample sheets should be tested and the results from those four tests should be averaged to determine a reportable data point. The data generated in Table 1 above represents data points of an average of four measures generated from the above test method.
The dimensions and values disclosed herein are not to be understood as being strictly limited to the exact numerical values recited. Instead, unless otherwise specified, each such dimension is intended to mean both the recited value and a functionally equivalent range surrounding that value. For example, a dimension disclosed as “40 mm” is intended to mean “about 40 mm.”
Every document cited herein, including any cross referenced or related patent or application, is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety unless expressly excluded or otherwise limited. The citation of any document is not an admission that it is prior art with respect to this disclosure or that claimed herein or that it alone, or in any combination with any other reference or references, teaches, suggests, or discloses any such invention. Further, to the extent that any meaning or definition of a term in this document conflicts with any meaning or definition of the same term in a document incorporated by reference, the meaning or definition assigned to that term in this document shall govern.
While particular embodiments of the present disclosure have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of this disclosure.
This application is a continuation of, and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 to, U.S. Pat. No. 11,254,024, issued on Feb. 22, 2022, which claims the benefit, under 35 USC § 119(e), of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/834,114, filed on Jun. 12, 2013, the entire disclosures of which are fully incorporated by reference herein
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 405412 | Hicks | Jun 1889 | A |
| 714652 | Davis | Nov 1902 | A |
| 1383868 | Smith | Jul 1921 | A |
| 2007544 | Meisel | Jul 1935 | A |
| 2328109 | Thompson | Aug 1943 | A |
| 2588581 | Sieger | Mar 1952 | A |
| 2805715 | Abraham | Sep 1957 | A |
| 3190163 | Bradley | Jun 1965 | A |
| 3228274 | George | Jan 1966 | A |
| 3264921 | Daniel | Aug 1966 | A |
| 3321145 | Gorman | May 1967 | A |
| 3467250 | Elia et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
| 3583558 | Davis | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3716132 | Lewyckyj | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3733949 | Bradley | May 1973 | A |
| 3752304 | Alef | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3762542 | Grimes | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3769868 | Hornung | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3770172 | Nystrand et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3779123 | Chafee | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3931886 | Yamauchi | Jan 1976 | A |
| 4034637 | Ollery | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4044641 | Burt, Jr. et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4164329 | Higby | Aug 1979 | A |
| 4199090 | Reed | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4210688 | Sato | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4244251 | Iwao et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4457964 | Kaminstein | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4610189 | Lombardo | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4745835 | Schnitzer | May 1988 | A |
| 4747364 | Horowitz | May 1988 | A |
| 4759247 | Bell et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4884719 | Levine et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 5041317 | Greyvenstein | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5114771 | Ogg et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5117718 | Wittkopf | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5125302 | Biagiotti | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5205454 | Schutz et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5246110 | Greyvenstein | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5284304 | Biagiotti | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5344091 | Molison | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5445054 | Pryor | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5453311 | Svensson | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5562964 | Jones | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5613347 | Weder | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5616387 | Augst et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5704566 | Schutz | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5740657 | Weder | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5740658 | Weder | Apr 1998 | A |
| D393950 | Lockhart | May 1998 | S |
| 5755654 | Schulz | May 1998 | A |
| 5789050 | Kang | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5797305 | Harrod et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5806399 | Oechsner | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5853117 | Traise | Dec 1998 | A |
| 6010090 | Bushmaker | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6029921 | Johnson | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6092354 | Takahashi | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6139186 | Fraser | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6228454 | Johnson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6431491 | Biagiotti | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6447864 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6460727 | Irwin | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6464120 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6536624 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6565794 | Fraser | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6694535 | Gianesi | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6698323 | Formon | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6838040 | Mlinar et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6877689 | Butterworth | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| D589264 | Hanafusa | Mar 2009 | S |
| 7707661 | Issachar | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7971514 | Alalu | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7988607 | Baggot et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8166857 | Powell et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8268429 | McNeil | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8277917 | Neto et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8283013 | Feldmann et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8287976 | Hupp | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8287977 | Mcneil et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8312797 | Hsu | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8353236 | De Marco et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8443725 | Mcneil et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8448816 | Gordon | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8468938 | Redd | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8535483 | Mellin et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8539867 | Powell et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8621966 | Germaine et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8757058 | Kien et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8763523 | Mcneil et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8763526 | Mcneil et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8802211 | Cattacin | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 9195861 | Bigari et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9259848 | Hupp et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9409372 | Hada et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9486932 | Baggot et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9539735 | Ferguson | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9592621 | Demarco et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9918595 | Olson et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9918596 | Olson et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9950892 | Slovut et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 10005197 | Kien et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10188242 | Olson et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10232524 | Slovut et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10293510 | Slovut et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10524622 | Olson et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10814513 | Kien et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
| 10857690 | Schwamberger et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10889459 | Slovut et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 10946545 | Kien et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 10947671 | Glass et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 10960566 | Slovut et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 11008709 | Glass et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
| 11008710 | Glass et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
| 20010000737 | Johnson et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
| 20020155246 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030000357 | Tanaka | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030033914 | Mutchnik et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030111169 | Baggot | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030132549 | Mlinar et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030172785 | Formon et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030218040 | Faulks et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030226431 | Motard | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040003699 | Welch | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040064911 | Klupfel et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040159693 | Adachi et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040182213 | Wagner | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040188556 | Jong | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040244556 | Neal | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050100715 | Bredahl et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050115372 | Cavlin | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050155478 | Zimmer | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20060011030 | Wagner et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20070000364 | Powell et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070014961 | Schneider et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070023135 | Giacometti | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070044613 | Cohn | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070209099 | Issachar | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080028902 | Baggot | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080280088 | Baum | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090212153 | Alalu | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235800 | Germaine et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100112264 | Barredo | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100167896 | Hada et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100199822 | De Marco et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100242698 | Hsu | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100243780 | Neto | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100264159 | Gordon | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100309544 | Nomura et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110192263 | De Marco et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110290920 | Kim et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110308363 | Kien et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110308366 | Redd | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110308370 | Hupp et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110308372 | Mcneil et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110308405 | Mcneil et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110308406 | Mcneil et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110308754 | Mcneil et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110311748 | Hupp | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110311749 | Mcneil et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110311750 | Mcneil et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110311751 | Feldmann et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120111166 | Yamada et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120174720 | Powell et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120198979 | Ohsawa | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120216663 | Carmichael | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120234145 | Kandemir | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120234152 | Carmichael | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120245011 | De Matteis | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130036884 | Schurch et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130049438 | Nootbaar et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130294808 | Douillard et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140174270 | Demarco et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140238210 | Baggot et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140344702 | Edge et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140346704 | Sartini et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140366695 | Kien et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140366702 | Kien et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140370224 | Kien et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150135925 | Abrahams | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150298340 | Baggot et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160144525 | Kenmotsu et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160271820 | Slovut et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160271823 | Slovut et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160271824 | Slovut et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160345761 | Olson et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160345786 | Olson et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170280946 | Weisang et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20180132674 | Olson et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180199766 | Olson et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180201464 | Slovut et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180264676 | Kien et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180361606 | Banowetz et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190077038 | Glass et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190077039 | Glass et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190078263 | Glass et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190078264 | Glass et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190078265 | Glass et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190078266 | Glass et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190078267 | Glass et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190125139 | Olson et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190152081 | Slovut et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190232517 | Slovut et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20200078976 | Schwamberger et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200085246 | Olson et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200094998 | Horz | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200214511 | Olson et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200290792 | Yasui | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20210060809 | Schwamberger et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210101772 | Slovut et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210146566 | Slovut et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
| 20210180258 | Glass et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210187776 | Slovut et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210197415 | Kien et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1090069 | Sep 1960 | DE |
| 1112881 | Aug 1961 | DE |
| 1291188 | Mar 1969 | DE |
| 1291188 | Mar 1969 | DE |
| 2706234 | Aug 1978 | DE |
| 10356037 | Jul 2005 | DE |
| 202005017013 | Jan 2006 | DE |
| 102005041180 | Mar 2007 | DE |
| 841649 | May 1998 | EP |
| 1010503 | Jun 2000 | EP |
| 1010503 | Jun 2000 | EP |
| 2161144 | Jul 1973 | FR |
| 2377471 | Aug 1978 | FR |
| 808244 | Jan 1959 | GB |
| 923029 | Apr 1963 | GB |
| 2488782 | Sep 2012 | GB |
| H0884685 | Apr 1996 | JP |
| 2005153997 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2005296588 | Oct 2005 | JP |
| 2007117366 | May 2007 | JP |
| 9002639 | Mar 1990 | WO |
| 9723398 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| 9825738 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO-9825738 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| 02100614 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| All Office Actions, U.S. Appl. No. 15/984,820, filed May 21, 2018. |
| All Office Actions, U.S. Appl. No. 14/301,384, filed Jun. 11, 2014. |
| All Office Actions, U.S. Appl. No. 14/301,415, filed Jun. 11, 2014. |
| All Office Actions, U.S. Appl. No. 14/301,392, filed Jun. 11, 2014. |
| All Office Actions, U.S. Appl. No. 17/182,312, filed Feb. 23, 2021. |
| PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for PCTAJS2014/041819 dated Sep. 23, 2014—5 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220332006 A1 | Oct 2022 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61834114 | Jun 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14301384 | Jun 2014 | US |
| Child | 17580686 | US |
