The present inventive concept relates to a method of performing diffusion weighted magnetic resonance measurements on a sample.
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) can be used to probe tissue microstructure and has both scientific and clinical applications. Diffusion encoding magnetic field gradients allow MR measurements to be sensitized for diffusion, which in turn can be used to infer information about tissue microstructure, anisotropy, shape and size of the constituent compartments, which may represent confinements/restrictions for diffusion of spin-bearing particles.
Recent developments in so-called b-tensor encoding have demonstrated that greater specificity to microstructural features can be recalled from imaging data. In particular b-tensor encoding allows for encoding schemes extending beyond linear/directional diffusion encoding (1D) traditionally used in e.g. diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), to multidimensional diffusion encoding including planar (2D) and ellipsoidal and spherical (3D) encoding. As disclosed for instance in “Measurement Tensors in Diffusion MRI: Generalizing the Concept of Diffusion Encoding” (Westin C-F. Szczepankiewicz F, Pasternak O, et al., Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2014; 17:209-216) such schemes can be described by diffusion encoding/weighting tensors with more than one non-zero eigenvalues and can, to various degrees, reduce or eliminate the confounding effect of orientation dispersion and provide sensitivity specific to compartment (diffusion tensor) anisotropy
As one example, the approach disclosed in “Microanisotropy imaging: quantification of microscopic diffusion anisotropy and orientational order parameter by diffusion MRI with magic-angle spinning of the q-vector”. (Lasič S, Szczepankiewicz F, Eriksson S, Nilsson M, Topgaard D, Front Phys 2014; 2:1-14), which maximizes the separation between the effects of compartment (diffusion tensor) anisotropy and orientation dispersion, combines directional (1D) and isotropic (3D) encoding to quantify microscopic fractional anisotropy (FA).
Current multidimensional diffusion encoding methods however typically assume there is no bulk motion of the sample during measurement. Bulk motion of the sample may result in signal drop out as well as signal and image artefacts. In some applications bulk motion of the sample cannot be avoided, such as when the object of interest is the tissue of a moving organ of a patient, for instance a heart. For this reason, dMRI-based analysis of microstructure of tissue of moving organs using current b-tensor encoding schemes is presently challenging.
An objective of the present inventive concept is to provide a method which allows precise diffusion weighted magnetic resonance measurements on a sample, even in presence of bulk motion of the sample. Further and alternative objectives may be understood from the following.
According to the inventive method for diffusion weighted magnetic resonance measurement, multidimensional diffusion encoding sequences may be adapted to present a reduced sensitivity to (i.e. compensation for) e.g. velocity (if m=1); or velocity and acceleration (if m=2). As will be further described below, the method allows for planar diffusion encoding (2D) as well as ellipsoidal and spherical diffusion encoding (3D).
The lower the value of the thresholds Tn, the greater the degree of motion compensation may be achieved. From the perspective of maximizing the degree of motion compensation it may be preferable that the gradient moment magnitudes along each direction assume a zero value, i.e. are “nulled”, at the end of the second encoding block (corresponding to Tn=0 for each order 0≤n≤m). However, it is contemplated that a less strict motion compensation in some instances may be acceptable, e.g. in view of other requirements on the magnetic field gradient g(t). That is, the actual threshold values may be selected depending on the details of each measurement, such that a desired degree of motion compensation is achieved.
As realized by the inventors, a greater number of oscillations of the magnetic field gradient g(t) allows nulling of higher order gradient moments. However, a greater number of oscillations increases the demands on the magnetic resonance scanner. Accordingly, providing motion compensation along each direction in a single encoding block may not be easily attainable, especially in combination with multidimensional diffusion encoding which on its own may be hardware demanding. The inventive method therefore provides two encoding blocks and requires the m-th order gradient moment magnitude to meet/fall below the threshold Tm along one of the directions (i.e. the y direction), but allows the m-th order gradient moment magnitude to exceed the threshold Tm along the other direction (i.e. the z direction). Thereby, motion compensated multidimensional diffusion encoding may be implemented on a broader range of magnetic resonance scanners.
When referred to herein, the magnetic field gradient g(t) refers to the effective magnetic field gradient unless indicated otherwise. Hence g(t) represents the gradient waveform vector accounting for the spin-dephasing direction after application of an arbitrary number of radio frequency (RF) pulses forming part of the diffusion encoding sequence, such as refocusing pulses.
The n-th order gradient moment along a direction l∈(y, z) is given by Mnl(t)=∫0tgl(t′)t′ndt′. This definition of the n-th order gradient moment applies also in the case of non-zero components gl(t) along three orthogonal directions l∈(x, y, z).
Accordingly, the n-th order gradient moment vector is given by Mn(t)=∫0tg(t′)t′ndt′.
The 0-th order gradient moment vector
where q(t) is the dephasing vector q(t)=γ∫0tg(t′)dt′ and γ is the gyromagnetic ratio.
The tensor representation b, or shorter the “b-tensor”, of the (effective) magnetic field gradient g(t) is given by b=γ2∫0τ
References to directions or axes, such as x, y and z, should be understood as mere labels and should not be interpreted as references to particular axes of gradient coil channels of the scanner, unless indicated otherwise.
The integer order m referred to above may be a predetermined value, selected depending on which orders of motion should be compensated for. In some embodiments, m may be equal to 1. This allows for velocity compensation. In some embodiments, m may be equal to 2. This allows for velocity and acceleration compensation. In some embodiments, m may be greater than 2. This allows for velocity and acceleration compensation as well as compensation for higher order motion.
Adapting g(t) to present m+1 zero crossings along a direction in each encoding block allows motion compensation up to order m along said direction. This will be shown more rigorously in the below. Increasing the number of zero crossings beyond m+1 (i.e. increasing the number of gradient oscillations) is possible however imposes higher demands on the scanner and reduces the efficiency of diffusion-weighting.
Providing gl(t) with m+1 zero crossings allows for a subdivision of gl(t) into m+2 sub-intervals in each encoding block, wherein gl(t)=0 at the start and end of each sub-interval.
As realized by the inventors, reversing the sign/polarity of the gradient component gz(t) during the second encoding block allows any residual m-th order gradient moment magnitude along the z direction to be reduced to become equal to or lower than the threshold Tm, i.e. such that |Mml(t)|≤Tm along the z direction. The sign of the gradient component may be changed or un-changed along the y direction.
According to some embodiments the magnetic field gradient g(t) comprises a silent block between the first and second encoding blocks during which g(t) is zero, and wherein the diffusion encoding sequence further comprises at least one radio frequency pulse applied to the sample during the silent block.
For instance, a 180° refocusing pulse may be applied during the silent block. The echo signals may in that case be acquired as spin echoes at echo time τE or as part of a diffusion-prepared pulse sequence.
As mentioned above, both 2D and 3D diffusion encoding sequences are possible. 2D encoding may be achieved using a b-tensor having exactly two non-zero eigenvalues. 3D encoding may be achieved using a b-tensor having exactly three non-zero eigenvalues.
g(t)gl(t)x, yzx|Mnx(t)|≤Tn0≤n≤mx|Mnx(t)|≤Tn0≤n≤m According to embodiments wherein the b-tensor has exactly three non-zero eigenvalues, the magnetic field gradient may present non-zero components along three orthogonal directions and, and wherein:
Accordingly, the thresholds Tn for each order 0≤n≤m are enforced along the two directions x, y during the first and second encoding blocks, but only for orders 0≤n≤m−1 along the direction z in the first encoding block. This approach allows an in principle arbitrary shape of the b-tensor (e.g. prolate, oblate, spherical) while allowing motion compensation up to order m.
The above-discussed advantages related to the number of zero crossings apply correspondingly to this case of 3D encoding.
τBtB1tB2gx(tB1+t′)=gx(tB2+t′)gy(tB1+t′)=−gy(tB2+t′) The first and second encoding blocks may be of a duration and begin at time and, respectively, and wherein
τBtB1tB2gx(tB1+t′)=gx(tB2+t′)gy(tB1+t′)=−gy(tB2+t′),
τBtB1tB2gx(tB1+t′)=gx(tB2+t′)gy(tB1+t′)=−gy(tB2+t′), and
gz(tB1+t′)=−gz(tB2+t′)0≤t′≤τB,
gz(tB1+t′)=−gz(tB2+t′)0≤t′≤τB for.
As discussed above, reversing the sign/polarity of the gradient component gz(t) during the second encoding block allows any residual m-th order gradient moment magnitude along the z direction to be reduced to become equal to or lower than the threshold Tm, i.e. such that |Mml(t)|≤Tm along the z direction. Meanwhile, reversing the sign only one of the other two directions allows 3D encoding to be obtained.
A trajectory of a dephasing vector q(t)=γ∫0tg(t′)dt′ may be confined to two orthogonal planes during the magnetic field gradient g(t). Restricting the trajectory of the dephasing vector to two orthogonal planes may improve diffusion-weighting efficiency in the design of the magnetic field gradient g(t) to achieve the desired motion compensation.
As mentioned above, the present approach allows an in principle arbitrary shape of the b-tensor. It is envisaged that the motion compensation may be combined with isotropic diffusion encoding in the sample.
According to some embodiments the sample is arranged in a static magnetic field oriented along said direction, and wherein the magnetic field gradient is oriented with respect to static magnetic field such that
is zero, where:
As realized by the inventors, by applying the gradient vector g(t) with a rotation minimizing K, allows reducing the effects of concomitant fields to a negligible level. The magnetic field gradient g(t) may hence be referred to as “Maxwell compensated”, so to speak. Hence, signal attenuation due to concomitant field gradients, which otherwise could produce measurement artefacts, may be mitigated or avoided without use of position dependent correction gradients.
The method may further comprise processing, by a processing device, data representing the one or more echo signals acquired from the sample to generate an image of the sample, such as a dMRI image.
The first and second encoding blocks of the magnetic field gradient g(t) may each comprises trapezoidal pulses or sinusoidal pulses. More generally, each encoding block may comprise a combination of trapezoidal and sinusoidal pulses.
As noted above, each Tn may be a zero-threshold, i.e. equal to zero. In such a case, any statement herein of |Mny(t)|≤Tn may be construed as |Mny(t)| being zero or nulled. Conversely, any statement herein of |Mny(t)>Tn may be construed as |Mny(t)| being greater than zero, i.e. not nulled.
mT1mT2T0m According to embodiments wherein is equal to or greater than 1, may be 1.20E-5, more preferably 1.18E-5, or even or more preferably
mT1mT2T0m 1.17E-5 (with unit T·s2·m−1). According to embodiments wherein is equal to or greater than 2, may be 4.8E-7, more preferably 4.7E-7, even more preferably 4.6E-7 (with unit T·s3·m−1). may for any value of be 1.20E-2, more preferably 1.18E-2, even more preferably 1.17E-2 (with unit T·s·m−1). These threshold values may provide a usable degree of motion compensation for various applications, such as wherein the sample is a heart or other moving organ of a patient.
The above, as well as additional objects, features and advantages of the present inventive concept, will be better understood through the following illustrative and non-limiting detailed description of preferred embodiments of the present inventive concept, with reference to the appended drawings. In the drawings like reference numerals will be used for like elements unless stated otherwise.
In diffusion weighted magnetic resonance measurement techniques, such as dMRI, the microstructure of a sample, such as tissue, may be probed via the diffusion of spin-bearing particles in the sample, typically water molecules. The term “diffusion” implies a random or stochastic process of motion of the spin-bearing particles within the sample. Diffusion may include random molecular motion driven by thermal energy, chemical energy and/or concentration difference. Such diffusion is also known as self-diffusion. Diffusion may include dispersed or in-coherent or turbulent flow of molecules (i.e. flow with velocity dispersion) inside randomly oriented microstructures within the sample. Such diffusion is also known as “pseudo-diffusion”. Hence, the effects of in-coherent flow within the sample may also give rise to signal attenuation due to the diffusion encoding magnetic field gradient sequences used in the present method. In the presence of bulk motion of the sample, as may be the case when performing measurements on a moving organ, such as a heart, the bulk motion may mask or distort the signal attenuation due to the actual diffusion.
In the following, diffusion encoding schemes allowing motion compensation to an arbitrary degree and up to an order of one or greater, and multidimensional diffusion encoding with b-tensors of arbitrary shape will be disclosed. The discussion and examples which follow will refer to 3D diffusion encoding (i.e. using a b-tensor having three non-zero eigenvalues) however as would be appreciated by the skilled person, they may with appropriate adaption be applied also to 2D diffusion encoding (i.e. using a b-tensor having only two non-zero eigenvalues).
[g(t)]l=g(t), (1)
where l∈(x, y, z). The effective gradient wave form vector g(t) takes into account the spin-dephasing direction after application of any number of refocusing RF pulses of the encoding sequence. The effective gradient wave form vector g(t) is related to the laboratory gradient waveform vector through
[glab(t)]l=h(t)gl(t), (2)
where l∈(x, y, z) and the sign function h(t) assumes values of 1 or −1 for each encoding period separated by refocusing pulses or 90° pulse pairs, so that neighboring periods separated by a refocusing pulse have opposite signs. In the present disclosure, the terminologies “gradient waveform vector g(t)” and “magnetic field gradient g(t)” may be used as synonyms, and always referring to the effective form of the vector/gradient unless indicated otherwise.
The encoding sequence 1 begins at time t=0 with an RF excitation pulse and ends at the time of echo acquisition t=τE. Hence, τE may represents the total encoding time.
The magnetic field gradient g(t) of the encoding sequence 1 comprises a first encoding block 10 and a second encoding block 20. The diagonal pattern indicates “silent time” of the encoding sequence 1 during which the magnetic field gradient g(t) is zero, i.e. absence of any diffusion encoding magnetic gradient. Accordingly, as indicated by
The first encoding block 10 starts at time t=τB1, i.e. the first time the magnetic field gradient g(t) becomes non-zero after the excitation pulse. The duration of the first encoding block 10 is TB. The first encoding block 10 ends at time t=τB1+τB, i.e. the last time the magnetic field gradient g(t) becomes zero prior to the silent block. The second encoding block 20 starts at time t=τB2, i.e. the first time the magnetic field gradient g(t) becomes non-zero after the silent block. The separation in time between the start of the first encoding block 10 and the start of the second encoding block 20 is given by 8. The duration of the second encoding block 20 is τB. The second encoding block 20 ends at time t=τB2+τB, i.e. the last time the magnetic field gradient g(t) becomes zero prior to the end of the encoding sequence 1 t=τE.
One or more RF pulses may be applied to the sample during the silent block, for example a single 180° refocusing RF pulse or a train of two or more 90° RF pulses. In
Although
Based on the gradient waveform vector g(t), a time-dependent n-th gradient moment vector may be defined as
Mn(t)=∫0tg(t′)t′ndt′. (3)
The evolution of M0(t) is proportional to the q-trajectory and may be referred to as such. The diffusion encoding tensor is given by
b=γ2∫0τ
where ⊗ represents tensor product and γ is gyromagnetic ratio.
For the purpose of the following analysis, a relative block time t′ may be defined as the local time of each encoding block 10, 20, i.e. starting at t′=0 at the start of an encoding block and ending at t′=τB at the end of the encoding block.
Any encoding block may as shown in
Let a component of vector g(t) within each sub-interval Ii of an encoding block 10, 20 be given by Ci{tilde over (ƒ)}i(t∈Ii), where Ci are positive or negative real constants and {tilde over (ƒ)}i(t) are normalized waveforms, where |{tilde over (ƒ)}i(t)|≤1. The entire component of the effective gradient within a block is thus given by a piecewise function ƒ(t) defined for each sub-interval. A trivial condition for ƒ(t) to be continuous, is that {tilde over (ƒ)}i=0 at the beginning and end of each sub-interval. An increment of a component of the n-th gradient moment vector Mn(t) within the i-th sub-interval Ii is given by
ΔMni=CiΔ{tilde over (M)}ni, (5)
Δ{tilde over (M)}ni=∫t∈I
The total increment of a component of Mn(t) within an encoding block is zero when
Components of Mn(t), i.e. Mnl(t) l∈(x, y, z), are nulled at t=τE either when ΔMn=0 for each encoding block or when the sum of ΔMn from all encoding blocks is zero. Let's first consider conditions for ΔMn=0 in a single encoding block. We have v adjustable parameters to fulfill condition (7). We can now deduce what is the minimum required number of sub-intervals v to fulfill (7) for all moments up to n, i.e.
ΔM0=0,ΔM1=0, . . . ΔMn=0. (8)
For the purpose of nulling moments, we can arbitrarily scale the entire waveform within an encoding block and thus set C1=1 in (7), which leads to condition
with v−1 adjustable parameters. The requirement (8) together with condition (9) can be formulated as a system of equations given by
ΔMC=0, (10)
ΔMvΔ{tilde over (M)}ijvC=(1, C2, C3, . . . , Cv)Tvv=n+2n=1v=3n=2v=4{tilde over (ƒ)}i=0n+1n=1n=2gl(t)g(t)n+1n+2Ci{tilde over (ƒ)}i(t)ΔMnlTn where is an by matrix with elements and C is a 1 by vector ΔMvΔ{tilde over (M)}ijvC=(1, C2, C3, . . . , Cv)Tvv=n+2n=1v=3n=2v=4{tilde over (ƒ)}i=0n+1n=1n=2gl(t)g(t)n+1n+2Ci{tilde over (ƒ)}i(t)ΔMnlTn with −1 free parameters. The critical case to solve for C is when. For velocity compensation, and thus. For velocity and acceleration compensation, and. With at the beginning and end of each sub-interval this may be expressed in terms of the number of zero crossings between the start and end of an encoding block, i.e. Hence, for velocity compensation, and thus the number of zero crossings becomes 2. For velocity and acceleration compensation, and the number of zero crossings becomes 3. In other words, designing a component of the gradient waveform vector to present zero crossings (or equivalently sub-intervals) allows for (with proper scaling of, as may be determined using equation (10)) achieving a along the direction with a magnitude/absolute value equal to or smaller than an arbitrarily small threshold.
Let's now consider the case of multiple encoding blocks such as encoding blocks 10, 20 with onset times at tB1, tB2, respectively. Let's first examine the case of blocks of equal duration TB. For any gradient vector component, to have all moments up to the n-th order nulled after the second block 20, we only need to fulfil condition (9) up to order n−1 in each of the encoding blocks 10, 20. For this we need to apply, in the second block 20, identical effective gradients but with opposite polarity compared to the first block 10. When the two blocks are not of equal duration, different scaling of the gradients in two blocks would be required. Assuming that moment increments of all degrees less then n are zero after the first block 10, inverting gradient polarity in the second block 20 inverts the sign of moment increment, and any residual moment after the first encoding block 10 can thus be cancelled by inverting gradient polarity in the second block 20. We can show that this is true for any effective gradient vector component gi(t), for which
gi(tB2+t′)=−gi(tB1+t′), (11)
where 0≤t′≤τB. The total gradient moment increment due to the first block is
The total gradient moment increment due to the second block is
Considering Eq. (11) in Eq. (13), we have
where δ=tB2−tB1. By expanding the second factor we get
where (mn) are binomial coefficients. If ΔMk,B1=0 for all k<n, we have
ΔMn,B2=−ΔMn,B1 (16)
and thus, the total moment Mn=ΔMn,B1+ΔMn,B2=0. If for example ΔMn,B1≠0, then Eq. (15) would lead to
ΔMn,B2=−ΔMn,B1−δnΔM0,B1, (17)
which would require effective gradients in two subsequent encoding blocks to not be related by a simple polarity inversion. Hence, the polarity switching of the gradient vector component gi(t) in the second encoding block 20 provides a simple and efficient way of minimizing up to an n-th order moment by a first and second encoding block 10, 20 each individually minimizing moments up until only n−1.
The effective gradient vector g(t), and thus also all moments Mn(t), can be arbitrarily rotated as g′(t)=Rg(t), where R is a unitary rotation matrix, to yield arbitrary rotation of tensor b. Note that multidimensional (tensorial) diffusion encoding generally typically involves incoherent gradient waveforms applied along multiple orthogonal directions, i.e. the ratio of gradients along orthogonal direction is not constant. Similarly, vector g(t), and thus also all moments Mn(t), can be arbitrarily scaled as g′(t)=Sg(t), where S is a diagonal matrix, to yield arbitrary shape (eigenvalue ratio) and size (trace) of b. A projection of g(t)′ along any direction u is given by [RSg(t)]·u, so if all Mn(τE)=0, also moment projections are zero, [RSg(t)]Mn(τE)·u=0.
The desired diffusion weighting gradients might acquire additional undesired components known as concomitant field gradients gC(t, r), which depend on position relative to the isocenter of the external magnetic field and the external magnetic field density B0. Assuming the external field at isocenter is aligned along the z-axis, concomitant field gradients can be approximated by
gC(t,r)≈GC(t)r, (18)
where
is the concomitant gradient matrix, which depends on the rotation of the gradients and thus also on rotation of the diffusion encoding tensor b. The amount of k-space shift is proportional to
To minimize or null the effects of concomitant fields, we require K to be minimized or K=0. This can be achieved for any b-tenor encoding waveforms, provided that the gradients are appropriately rotated relative to the main magnetic field vector B0.
A particular realization of b-tensor encoding with gradient moment nulling (up to arbitrary moment) can be realized when q-trajectory is constrained to be always parallel to one of two stationary orthogonal planes, characterized by normal vectors n1 and n2. Minimizing K or nulling K, so that K=0, can be achieved by applying an appropriate rotation of gradient waveforms.
A number of example effective gradient vector waveforms g(t), designed according to the above will now be discussed.
respectively. The gradient waveform comprises a number of trapezoidal pulses. More specifically, the X and Y components comprises four trapezoidal pulses in each encoding block whereas the Z component comprises three trapezoidal pulses. As may be seen, for axes X and Y, each one of m0, m1 and m2 become zero at the end of each encoding block (i.e. at t=0.5 and t=1). However, for axis Z only m0 and ml become zero at the end of the first encoding block while each one of m0, m1 and m2 become zero at the end of the second encoding block. The nulling of m2 at the end of the second encoding block is achieved by the polarity switching of the effective gradient component along the Z axis, visible in
and
respectively. As may be seen, for axes X and Y, each one of m0, m1 and m2 become zero at the end of each encoding block (i.e. at t=0.5 and t=1). However, for axis Z only m0 and m1 become zero at the end of the first encoding block while each one of m0, m1 and m2 become zero at the end of the second encoding block. The nulling of m2 at the end of the second encoding block is achieved by the polarity switching of the effective gradient component along the Z axis, visible in
Although the gradient amplitudes of the above example waveforms are adjusted to yield spherical b-tensors, it may from the above analysis be understood that the velocity and acceleration compensation may be obtained also for non-spherical b-tensors. Further, although the above examples relate to 3D encoding, velocity and acceleration compensation may also be achieved for 2D encoding, i.e. with a b-tensor comprising only two non-zero eigenvalues.
It should be further be noted that it may be preferred, but not necessary, to enforce the gradient moments to become zero. Rather, one may depending on the measurement requirements establish a threshold Tn for each motion order up to m≥1 which is to be compensated for, the threshold representing a maximum acceptable gradient moment magnitude at the end of the second encoding block |Mnl(t)|.
x|Mnx(t)|≤Tn0≤n≤m Accordingly, the condition at the end of the first encoding block may be defined as:
Indeed, the waveforms of the above examples meet these conditions assuming thresholds Tn set to 0 or substantially 0.
A similar set of conditions may be established for a 2D encoding scheme.
Magnetic gradients may be generated by a gradient coil 120 of the scanner 100. The gradient coil 120 may comprise a coil part for generating each respective component of the gradient glab(t). The orientation of the gradient glab(t) may be controlled through the relative orientation of the magnetic gradient components and the static main magnetic field B0 generated by a main magnet 110 of the scanner 100. The scanner 100 may comprise a controller 240 for controlling the operation of the scanner 100, in particular the magnet 110, the gradient coil 120, RF transmission and receiving systems 140, 160 and signal acquisition, etc. The controller 240 may be implemented on one or more processors of the scanner 100 wherein control data for generating the magnetic gradient and RF sequences of the encoding sequence may be implemented using software instructions which may be stored on a computer readable media (e.g. on a non-transitory computer readable storage medium) and be executed by the one or more processors. The software instructions may for example be stored in a program/control section of a memory of the controller 240, to which the one or more processors has access. It is however also possible to implement the functionality of the controller 240 in the form of dedicated circuitry such as in one or more integrated circuits, in one or more application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) or field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), to name a few examples.
As is per se is known in the art, the diffusion encoding magnetic gradients may be supplemented with non-diffusing encoding magnetic gradients (i.e. gradients applied for purposes other than diffusion encoding) such as crusher gradients, gradients for slice selection, imaging correction gradients etc.
The encoding sequence may be followed by a detection block, during the detection block the scanner 100 may be operated to acquire one or more echo signals from the sample S. More specifically, the echo signals may be diffusion attenuated echo signals resulting from the preceding diffusion encoding sequence. The detection block may be implemented using any conventional signal acquisition technique, echo planar imaging (EPI) being one example. The echo signals may be acquired by the RF receiving system 160 of the scanner 100. The acquired echo signals may be sampled and digitized and stored as measurement data in a memory 180 of the scanner 100. The measurement data may for instance be processed by a processing device 200 of the scanner 100. In a dMRI application the processing may for example comprise generating a digital image of the sample S, which for instance may be displayed on a monitor 220 connected to the scanner 100. It is also possible to process acquired echo signals remotely from the scanner 100. The scanner 100 may for instance be configured to communicate with a computer via a communication network such as a LAN/WLAN or via some other serial or parallel communication interface wherein the computer may process received measurement data as desired.
As may be appreciated, an accurate characterization of the sample S, such as by generation of an dMRI image, may be based on echo signal data acquired during a plurality of subsequent measurements, for different strength of diffusion weighting and/or different relative orientations of the static magnetic field and diffusion encoding gradients glab(t), different shapes and/or dimensionalities of b-tensors etc.
In the above the inventive concept has mainly been described with reference to a limited number of examples. However, as is readily appreciated by a person skilled in the art, other examples than the ones disclosed above are equally possible within the scope of the inventive concept, as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1950507-2 | Apr 2019 | SE | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. National Stage patent application Ser. No. 17/594,685, filed Oct. 26, 2021, which is a National Stage of International Application No. PCT/SE2020/050414 filed Apr. 24, 2020, which claims the benefit of Swedish Application No. 1950507, filed Apr. 26, 2019, now Swedish Patent No. 543292, issued Nov. 17, 2020, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11747423 | Teh | Sep 2023 | B2 |
20100277169 | Feiweier | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20130187649 | Bhat et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20160291113 | Stemmer | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170234956 | Feiweier | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180348325 | Feiweier et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190004137 | Harris et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20200284865 | Szczepankiewicz et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2013025487 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2015119569 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2017116300 | Jul 2017 | WO |
2017132180 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2018088954 | May 2018 | WO |
2018088955 | May 2018 | WO |
2019050462 | Mar 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/SE2020/050414, mailed May 5, 2020, 12 pages. |
Westin et al., “Q-space trajectory imaging for multidimensional diffusion MRI of the human brain,” NeuroImage, vol. 135, Jul. 2016, pp. 345-362. |
Topgaard, “Multidimensional diffusion MRI,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 275, Feb. 2017, pp. 98-113. |
Lampinen et al., “Neurite density imaging versus imaging of microscopic anisotropy in diffusion Mri: A model comparison using spherical tensor encoding,” Neuroimage, vol. 147, Feb. 2017, pp. 517-531. |
Nilsson et al., “Imaging brain tumour microstructure,” Neurolmage, vol. 182, Nov. 2018, pp. 232-250. |
Szczepankiewicz et al., “Tensor-valued diffusion encoding for diffusional variance decomposition (DIVIDE): Technical feasibility in clinical MRI systems,” PlosOne, nr.3, vol. 14., Mar. 2019, pp. 1-20. |
Topgaard, “Diffusion tensor distribution imaging,” NMR in biomedicine, nr.5, vol. 32., Feb. 2019, pp. 1-12. |
Aliotta et al., “Convex optimized diffusion encoding (CODE) gradient waveforms for minimum for echo time and bulk motion-compensated diffusion-weighted MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, nr.2, vol. 77, Feb. 2017, pp. 717-729. |
Afzali et al., “Comparison of different tensor encoding combinations in microstructural parameter estimation,” 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, Apr. 2019, pp. 1471-1474. |
Gumus et al. “Prevention of Motion-Induced Signal Loss in Diffusion-Weighted Echo-Planar Imaging by Dynamic Restoration of Gradient Moments,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, nr.6, vol. 71, Jun. 2014, pp. 2006-2013. |
Moulin et al. “Effect of flow-encoding strength on intravoxel incoherent motion in the liver,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, nr.3, vol. 81, Sep. 2018, pp. 1521-1533. |
Szczepankiewicz, et al., “Maxwell-compensated design of asymmetric gradient waveforms for tensor-valued diffusion encoding,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 82, first published May 31, 2019, arXiv, 24 pages. |
Welsh et al., “Higher-Order Motion-Compensation for In Vivo Cardiac Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Rats,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, nr.9, vol. 34, Sep. 2015, pp. 1843-1853. |
Extended European Search Report mailed Dec. 21, 2022, issued in corresponding European U.S. Appl. No. 20/795,044, filed Apr. 24, 2020, 7 pages. |
N. Moutal et al., “Probing Surface-to-Volume Ratio of an Anisotropic Medium by Diffusion NMR with General Gradient Encoding,” in IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 38, No. 11, pp. 2507-2522, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2902957. |
S. Lasic et al., “Motion-compensated b-tensor encoding for in vivo cardiac diffusion-weighted imaging”, NMR in Biomedicine, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4213, Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240192298 A1 | Jun 2024 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17594685 | US | |
Child | 18353302 | US |