The present invention relates to a method of printing for producing large size printed products that exceed a maximum print size of a printer or a maximum available media size.
Wide format printing is known in the art. For example flatbed printers of the Océ Arizona product line are configured to print large size images on a wide variety of large substrates, e.g. larger than A3.
It is also known in the art that for printing large size images exceeding the maximum print size of the printer (or the maximum available media size), the image needs to be divided in a plurality of parts that are smaller than the maximum print size of the printer. Then the plurality of parts of the image is printed as a plurality of panels (or tiles) which are assembled after printing to form a complete product. The assembling of the complete product is also termed stitching.
It is a disadvantage of the prior art that the edges of the plurality of panels remain visible after assembly of the complete product. This effect is even more pronounced in case of 3D prints (i.e. printed products of a 3D image comprising color and height information), e.g. fine art reproductions where the printed product has additional important properties like topology (relief), gloss and transparency.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to overcome or at least mitigate said disadvantage and provide a method for producing large size printed products that exceed the maximum print size of a printer or the maximum available media size, wherein the printed product is produced as a plurality of panels and assembled (stitched) to form a complete product, and wherein the complete product has an improved appearance, in particular with respect to the visibility of the edges of the individual panels within the complete product comprising said plurality of panels.
This object can be obtained with a printing method comprising the steps of:
The above method can also be used to facilitate transportation and reduce transportation costs and/or to reducing the risk of damaging (fragile) printed products, even if the printed product could be produced in a single step.
It is further noted that a method according to the present invention is a method for optimal division of the digital image, meaning that the contours of the obtained plurality of partial images run across the digital image, while methods known in the prior art provide cutting lines along the contours of the digital image.
In an embodiment, the digital image comprises height information for each pixel and the algorithm for determining optimal division of the digital image into a plurality of parts is based on height information of the plurality of pixels.
In an embodiment, the digital image may comprise further information for each pixel, for example (but not limited to) gloss information and transparency information, and the algorithm for determining optimal division of the digital image into a plurality of parts is based on said further information, in particular on gloss and/or transparency information.
In an embodiment, the image processing step c) further comprises adding an excess of pixels to the plurality of partial images, such that the plurality of partial images exceed the defined plurality of accompanying contours, wherein cutting step f is performed after printing step c to remove a part of the substrate containing the excess of pixels from the partial image printed in step c.
It is an advantage of the present embodiment, that full bleed printing is not required.
It is another advantage of the present embodiment, that the digital image itself can be used in optical alignment with high accuracy during the cutting process, optionally by providing additional cutting marks to the digital image, thereby providing high accuracy cuts. Improved alignment between adjacent partial images printed on adjacent panels can thus be obtained.
In an embodiment, the cutting is performed at an angle of between 0.2° and 3°, preferably between 0.5° and 2°, relative to the normal vector of the printed surface, such that after cutting and assembling, the panels touch one another at the top edge side, i.e. the edges of the adjacent printed partial images touch one another. Substrate visibility in the final (assembled) print product is hence further reduced.
In an embodiment, the cutting step f is performed prior to the printing step c.
The method according to the present embodiment may be preferred in case the cutting step is detrimental for the printed material or in case the printed structure is too fragile for the cutting process.
In an embodiment, the algorithm for determining optimal division of the digital image into a plurality of parts provides a cutting trajectory through areas of the digital image with high surface roughness (of the final printed product).
In general surfaces having a surface roughness Ra of below 0.2 μm may have a glossy appearance. High surface roughness in the context of the present invention may therefore be construed as a surface having a Ra of above 0.2 μm, in particular Ra>>0.2 μm.
It is an advantage of the present embodiment, that glossy areas (i.e. smooth areas having a low surface roughness.) in the image are avoided in the cutting step, such that the transition between two adjacent panels is less visible.
In an embodiment, the algorithm for determining optimal division of the digital image into a plurality of parts provides a cutting trajectory through areas of the digital image with dark colors.
In the experience of the inventions, the dark colored areas show less pronounced transitions between the partial images. However, other factors such as the used cutting technique, substrate material and printing material may be of influence in determining the preferred color range for cutting.
In an embodiment, the algorithm for determining optimal division of the digital image into a plurality of parts comprises a step of avoiding the cutting trajectory to go through critical 3D shapes (such as overhanging parts or particularly known fragile (micro) structures).
In an embodiment, the algorithm for determining optimal division of the digital image into a plurality of parts comprises a step of smoothening the obtained trajectory in order to avoid sharp direction transitions in the trajectory.
In an embodiment, the algorithm for determining optimal division of the digital image into a plurality of parts comprises a step of taking into account requirements and/or restrictions of the used cutting technology. For example selection of criteria based on cutting technology induced artifacts or capabilities of the cutting technology, e.g. critical curvature of the cutting trajectory above which the risk of damage significantly increases.
The substrate is not particularly limited to any kind. However, in an embodiment, the substrate is selected from the group consisting of vinyl, paper, PVC, PET, dibond, textile, foam, cardboard, wood, ceramics and metals.
In an embodiment, the algorithm for determining optimal division of the digital image into a plurality of parts provides contours of the plurality of partial images, wherein the contours of the plurality of partial images are determined with a constraint that the obtained plurality of panels can be assembled to form a mechanically stable printed product. For example a preferential form of the cutting trajectory may be introduced, e.g. a puzzle like structure.
In an embodiment, a 3D-image is adapted at the location of the determined cutting trajectory to reduce the visibility of the transversal area after cutting. For example the printed layers building the height of the image at the location of the cutting trajectory can be printed in the same color, in particular the same color as the top layer of the digital image at that location.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to a printed object, obtained with a method according to the present invention.
In an embodiment, the printed object is fine art reproduction.
In an embodiment, the printed object comprises a plurality of parts that are assembled after production of the plurality of parts to form the printed object.
In yet another aspect the present invention relates to a printer comprising a controller configured for performing a method according to the present invention.
In an embodiment, the controller comprises an algorithm for determining optimal division of the digital image into a plurality of parts based on the color information of the plurality of pixels of the digital image.
In an embodiment, the controller comprises an algorithm for determining optimal division of the digital image into a plurality of parts based on the height information of the plurality of pixels of the digital image.
In an embodiment, the digital image may comprise further information for each pixel, for example (but not limited to) gloss information and transparency information, the controller comprises an algorithm for determining optimal division of the digital image into a plurality of parts based on said further information, in particular on gloss and/or transparency information.
In an embodiment, the controller comprises an algorithm for determining optimal division of the digital image into a plurality of parts based on critical feature information of the digital image.
In an embodiment, the controller comprises a user interface for entering input data based on which the algorithm generates a trajectory for optimal division of the digital image.
In a further embodiment, the input data comprise at least one selected from the group consisting of: requirements and/or restrictions of the cutting technology; substrate type; ink type; maximum size of division parts of the product; number of division parts of the product; and user defined critical features in the digital image.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given herein below and accompanying schematical drawings which are given by way of illustration only and are not limitative of the invention, and wherein:
The presented invention relates to a method that aims at producing a cutting trajectory design that preserves critical features (optionally user defined) of printed matter, in particular relief printed matter. The cutting trajectory is formed by a set of points characterized by their coordinates in the digital (relief) image.
The cutting trajectory is then submitted to a cutting machine (e.g. CNC-cutter-milling machine; laser-beam cutter; water-beam cutter, etc) to produce a plurality of substrates (e.g. panels, tiles) comprising a corresponding plurality of parts of the digital (relief) image. The plurality of parts of the digital image can be printed prior or after cutting the substrate into the plurality of substrates. Afterwards, the plurality of substrates can be packaged, shipped and reassembled to form the complete (relief) printed product, e.g. a fine art reproduction.
The cutting trajectory used in a method according to the present invention is generated based on specific features such as (but not limited to) color, height, gloss and translucency of a digital image to be printed and in accordance with a method (from now on termed “cutting trajectory generation”) described below.
Trajectory generation starts with defining a cutting trajectory search area within the digital image to be printed. This area defines a region where the image or the (printed) substrate can be divided into two parts, based on the size of the print and the maximum size of the printing area and/or the available maximum substrate size.
The cutting trajectory is enclosed by the search area and crosses this search area (e.g. having a rectangular shape) in a first direction, for example a vertical direction (e.g. from the top to the bottom of the search area). The same procedure can be performed in a second direction substantially perpendicular to the first direction (e.g. from left to right), to produce tiles that can be easily handled.
The cutting trajectory generation of the present example comprises three main steps, which will be further described in the sections below (numbering of the steps corresponds to the numbering in
Besides the digital image input (shown in
Step 1: Setting the Critical Feature Criterion
The cutting trajectory generation starts with specifying a criterion which describes the areas of the digital image or the printed substrate that the cutting trajectory path should preferably not cross: the critical feature criterion. The critical feature criterion is based on knowledge of the risk of damaging the printed matter during cutting and prevents that the cutting trajectory runs through areas of the digital image or the printed substrate with a high risk of being damaged during cutting. This criterion may be dependent on image information, but also on the used cutting technique and/or used print substrates and/or used print materials. The criterion may be (partially) user defined, and may be (partially) automatically determined or a combination of both.
The digital image may comprise color and/or height (relief) and/or gloss and/or translucency information. Based on the print input, the user may specify critical features that must be preserved and hence preferably avoided by the cutting process. For example:
In the cutting trajectory generation used in a method according the present invention, the critical features criterion may be represented as a grey level image (critical features map), wherein the grey level indicates the importance of regions in the digital image containing critical features and the differences in grey levels in the critical features map indicates the relative importance critical features in the digital image. For example, regions containing highly critical features are considered to be highly important regions to avoid in the cutting process and such regions are indicated with high grey value (black). The other way around is also a possibility. This is a matter of convention.
Referring to the above examples, the critical features criterion may be determined by using the following features of the digital image:
Additionally, the cutting trajectory generation may comprise detection (automatic or manually) of isolated features having a critical shape, for example:
A map indicating the location of isolated features having a critical shape, 1d in
Individual criteria as discussed above may be dependent on the capabilities of the used cutting technology (e.g. mechanical cutting, laser-beam cutting, water-beam cutting, etc), used ink material and substrates.
Note that the presence of multiple features (for example, high elevated area and region with bright colors) may lead to multiple criteria for cutting trajectory generation. Those criteria may however be contradicting one another. For example, low elevated regions may be printed with high lightness. As low elevated regions might be chosen to be preferred for the cutting trajectory, the cut line may then also cross bright region.
In order to solve the above, a global criterion (i.e. an image map pixel wise indicating the desirability to avoid said pixel in a cutting trajectory, e.g. 0=OK to cut; 1=not OK to cut) may be defined taking into account multiple criteria (e.g. color map, height map, height map gradients, gloss map, etc) for generating a cutting trajectory. The global criterion may be expressed as a linear combination of multiple image criteria, taking into account the relative importance of a single image criterion by weight factors as expressed in equation 1. The image criteria are first normalized and then weighted:
GC=Σi=1nWi*ICCi (1)
wherein:
GC represents the global criterion;
ICi represents a normalized image criterion i (there are n criteria);
Wi is the applied weight factor for ICi, wherein Σi=1n Wi=1
The global criterion shown in
Step 2—Cutting Trajectory Initialization
In the present example, two ways to start a cutting trajectory generation are discussed: user defined and (semi-)automatic.
User Defined Cutting Trajectory Initialization:
In this approach, the user manually draws a cutting trajectory by approximately indicating one or more regions where the cutting trajectory should be located. At this stage high precision (which would be time consuming and prone to errors) is not required because in a next step of the cutting trajectory generation, refinement of the initially indicated cutting trajectory will be performed.
Automatic Cutting Trajectory Generation:
In this approach, based on one or more image criteria and/or the global criterion as discussed above an algorithm such as a minimum cost path search algorithm like the Dijkstra method may be used to determine an initial cutting trajectory. Such mathematical methods are known in the art and therefore not further discussed here.
As can be seen in
However, the initial cutting trajectory 2a may show abrupt and/or sharp direction changes, oscillations and may be too close from edges of critical features. That is the reason why, a refinement stage is proposed as Step 3.
Step 3—Cutting Trajectory Refinement:
Given an initial cutting trajectory, C0 2a in
Cutting trajectory refinement may be inspired by methods and/or algorithms known in the prior art, for example the so called active contour method (also called snake method or algorithm, see 4 in
The cutting trajectory iteratively converges towards a local minimum of an energy function, E, represented in equation 2:
E=E
curv
+E
stif
+E
crit (2)
wherein:
The partial differential equation can be minimized using approaches known from prior art. The coordinates of the starting point and end point of the cutting trajectory are the boundary conditions for solving the partial differential equation. Minimizing E ensures that the cutting trajectory C satisfies the two previously mentioned constraints, i.e. it is smooth and it crosses the search area at points where the critical features criterion is used as a guide towards the desired solution.
The minimization of Ecrit may involve the generation of a force field (based on a criterion map, e.g. the global criterion map, see 4 in
According to a method of the present invention a repulsive force field that is derived from the critical feature criterion (e.g. global criterion) may be computed. Basically a gradient in grey level of a pixel in the critical feature criterion with respect to its surrounding pixels is calculated and expressed as a single force vector of the pixel.
The force field may be designed to provide the desired properties to the final curve. For example, the user may want the curve to be as far as possible from the critical features. So a repulsive force vector flow centered on each feature can be built. As general principle the force field will guide the cutting trajectory through the search region where the force field is neutral, e.g. force is zero or force cancellation (force vectors of adjacent pixels at least partially cancel one another).The evolution of the cutting trajectory will be implemented by a snake algorithm parameterized by the, so determined, repulsive force field.
Repulsive force fields regarding critical features can be determined based on several criteria and also based on a combination of criteria. For example:
Mathematical methods for performing the steps described above are known in the art and not further discussed.
This method is particularly suitable for cutting trajectory generation in cases wherein (but not limited to):
Detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention, which can be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention in virtually any appropriately detailed structure. In particular, features presented and described in separate dependent claims may be applied in combination and any advantageous combination of such claims is herewith disclosed.
Further, the terms and phrases used herein are not intended to be limiting; but rather, to provide an understandable description of the invention. The terms “a” or “an”, as used herein, are defined as one or more than one.
The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
16159546.7 | Mar 2016 | EP | regional |