Method of producing a coating using a kinetic spray process with large particles and nozzles for the same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6623796
  • Patent Number
    6,623,796
  • Date Filed
    Friday, April 5, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 23, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A method of depositing large particles having an average nominal diameter of greater than 106 microns up to 250 microns onto substrates using a kinetic spray system is disclosed. The method utilizes a powder injector tube having a reduced inner diameter and a de Laval type nozzle having an elongated throat to exit end length. The method permits deposition of much larger particles than previously possible.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




The present invention is directed to a method for producing a coating using a kinetic spray system with much larger particles than previously used. The invention further includes a kinetic spray nozzle for use with the larger particles. The invention permits one to increase the particle size used in the system up to at least 250 microns, thereby increasing the range of useful particles and decreasing the processing difficulties associated with the smaller particles typically used.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




A new technique for producing coatings on a wide variety of substrate surfaces by kinetic spray, or cold gas dynamic spray, was recently reported in an article by T. H. Van Steenkiste et al., entitled “Kinetic Spray Coatings,” published in Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 111, pages 62-71, Jan. 10, 1999. The article discusses producing continuous layer coatings having low porosity, high adhesion, low oxide content and low thermal stress. The article describes coatings being produced by entraining metal powders in an accelerated air stream, through a converging-diverging de Laval type nozzle and projecting them against a target substrate. The particles are accelerated in the high velocity air stream by the drag effect. The air used can be any of a variety of gases including air or helium. It was found that the particles that formed the coating did not melt or thermally soften prior to impingement onto the substrate. It is theorized that the particles adhere to the substrate when their kinetic energy is converted to a sufficient level of thermal and mechanical deformation. Thus, it is believed that the particle velocity must be high enough to exceed the yield stress of the particle to permit it to adhere when it strikes the substrate. It was found that the deposition efficiency of a given particle mixture was increased as the inlet air temperature was increased. Increasing the inlet air temperature decreases its density and increases its velocity. The velocity varies approximately as the square root of the inlet air temperature. The actual mechanism of bonding of the particles to the substrate surface is not fully known at this time. It is believed that the particles must exceed a critical velocity prior to their being able to bond to the substrate. The critical velocity is dependent on the material of the particle. It is believed that the initial particles to adhere to a substrate have broken the oxide shell on the substrate material permitting subsequent metal to metal bond formation between plastically deformed particles and the substrate. Once an initial layer of particles has been formed on a substrate subsequent particles bind not only to the voids between previous particles bound to the substrate but also engage in particle to particle bonds. The bonding process is not due to melting of the particles in the air stream because the temperature of the air stream is always below the melting temperature of the particles and the temperature of the particles is always below that of the air stream.




This work improved upon earlier work by Alkimov et al. as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,302,414, issued Apr. 12, 1994. Alkimov et al. disclosed producing dense continuous layer coatings with powder particles having a particle size of from 1 to 50 microns using a supersonic spray.




The Van Steenkiste article reported on work conducted by the National Center for Manufacturing Sciences (NCMS) to improve on the earlier Alkimov process and apparatus. Van Steenkiste et al. demonstrated that Alkimov's apparatus and process could be modified to produce kinetic spray coatings using particle sizes of greater than 50 microns and up to about 106 microns.




This modified process and apparatus for producing such larger particle size kinetic spray continuous layer coatings are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,139,913, and 6,283,386. The process and apparatus provide for heating a high pressure air flow up to about 650° C. and combining this with a flow of particles. The heated air and particles are directed through a de Laval-type nozzle to produce a particle exit velocity of between about 300 m/s (meters per second) to about 1000 m/s. The thus accelerated particles are directed toward and impact upon a target substrate with sufficient kinetic energy to impinge the particles to the surface of the substrate. The temperatures and pressures used are sufficiently lower than that necessary to cause particle melting or thermal softening of the selected particle. Therefore, no phase transition occurs in the particles prior to impingement. It has been found that each type of particle material has a threshold critical velocity that must be exceeded before the material begins to adhere to the substrate. The disclosed method did not disclose the use of particles in excess of 106 microns.




One difficulty associated with all of these prior art kinetic spray systems arises from the small size of the particles that are used. The largest particles are 106 microns, and more typically the particles range from 10 to 50 microns. Because of their large surface to volume ratio these particles tend to have a higher level of oxide formation which is detrimental to the process. It is also difficult to handle these small particles in the feed systems, because they tend to clog the systems. Thus it would be very beneficial to develop a process that could use larger particles to reduce these problems.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In a first embodiment the present invention is a method of kinetic spray coating a substrate comprising the steps of: providing particles having an average nominal diameter equal to or less than 250 microns; entraining the particles into a flow of a gas, the gas at a temperature below a melt temperature of the particles; and directing the particles entrained in the flow of gas through a supersonic nozzle having a length from a throat to an exit end of from 200 to 400 millimeters thereby accelerating the particles to a velocity sufficient to result in adherence of the particles on a substrate positioned opposite the nozzle.




In a second embodiment the present invention is a method of kinetic spray coating a substrate comprising the steps of: providing particles having an average nominal diameter equal to or less than 250 microns; passing the particles through a powder injector tube having an inner diameter equal to or less than 0.90 millimeters and into a flow of a gas; entraining the particles into the flow of the gas, the gas at a temperature below a melt temperature of the particles; and directing the particles entrained in the flow of gas through a supersonic nozzle having a length from a throat to an exit end of from 200 to 400 millimeters thereby accelerating the particles to a velocity sufficient to result in adherence of the particles on a substrate positioned opposite the nozzle.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




In the drawings:





FIG. 1

is a generally schematic layout illustrating a kinetic spray system for performing the method of the present invention; and





FIG. 2

is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a kinetic spray nozzle used in the system.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




The present invention comprises an improvement to the kinetic spray process as generally described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,139,913, 6,283,386 and the article by Van Steenkiste, et al. entitled “Kinetic Spray Coatings” published in Surface and Coatings Technology Volume III, Pages 62-72, Jan. 10, 1999, all of which are herein incorporated by reference.




Referring first to

FIG. 1

, a kinetic spray system according to the present invention is generally shown at


10


. System


10


includes an enclosure


12


in which a support table


14


or other support means is located. A mounting panel


16


fixed to the table


14


supports a work holder


18


capable of movement in three dimensions and able to support a suitable workpiece formed of a substrate material to be coated. The enclosure


12


includes surrounding walls having at least one air inlet, not shown, and an air outlet


20


connected by a suitable exhaust conduit


22


to a dust collector, not shown. During coating operations, the dust collector continually draws air from the enclosure


12


and collects any dust or particles contained in the exhaust air for subsequent disposal.




The spray system


10


further includes an air compressor


24


capable of supplying air pressure up to 3.4 MPa (500 psi) to a high pressure air ballast tank


26


. The air ballast tank


26


is connected through a line


28


to both a high pressure powder feeder


30


and a separate air heater


32


. The air heater


32


supplies high pressure heated air, the main gas described below, to a kinetic spray nozzle


34


. The powder feeder


30


mixes particles of a spray powder with unheated high pressure air and supplies the mixture to a supplemental inlet line


48


of the nozzle


34


. A computer control


35


operates to control both the pressure of air supplied to the air heater


32


and the temperature of the heated main gas exiting the air heater


32


.





FIG. 2

is a cross-sectional view of the nozzle


34


and its connections to the air heater


32


and the supplemental inlet line


48


. A main air passage


36


connects the air heater


32


to the nozzle


34


. Passage


36


connects with a premix chamber


38


which directs air through a flow straightener


40


and into a mixing chamber


42


. Temperature and pressure of the air or other heated main gas are monitored by a gas inlet temperature thermocouple


44


in the passage


36


and a pressure sensor


46


connected to the mixing chamber


42


.




The mixture of unheated high pressure air and coating powder is fed through the supplemental inlet line


48


to a powder injector tube


50


comprising a straight pipe having a predetermined inner diameter. The tube


50


has a central axis


52


which is preferentially the same as the axis of the premix chamber


38


. The tube


50


extends through the premix chamber


38


and the flow straightener


40


into the mixing chamber


42


.




Mixing chamber


42


is in communication with the de Laval type nozzle


54


. The nozzle


54


has an entrance cone


56


that decreases in diameter to a throat


58


. Downstream of the throat is an exit end


60


. The largest diameter of the entrance cone


56


may range from 10 to 6 millimeters, with 7.5 millimeters being preferred. The entrance cone


56


narrows to the throat


58


. The throat


58


may have a diameter of from 3.5 to 1.5 millimeters, with from 3 to 2 millimeters being preferred. The portion of the nozzle


54


from downstream of the throat


58


to the exit end


60


may have a variety of shapes, but in a preferred embodiment it has a rectangular cross-sectional shape. At the exit end


60


the nozzle


54


preferably has a rectangular shape with a long dimension of from 8 to 14 millimeters by a short dimension of from 2 to 6 millimeters.




As disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,139,913 and 6,283,386 the powder injector tube


50


supplies a particle powder mixture to the system


10


under a pressure in excess of the pressure of the heated main gas from the passage


36


. The nozzle


54


produces an exit velocity of the entrained particles of from 300 meters per second to as high as 1200 meters per second. The entrained particles gain kinetic and thermal energy during their flow through this nozzle. It will be recognized by those of skill in the art that the temperature of the particles in the gas stream will vary depending on the particle size and the main gas temperature. The main gas temperature is defined as the temperature of heated high-pressure gas at the inlet to the nozzle


54


. Since these temperatures are substantially less than the melting point of the particles, even upon impact, there is no change in the solid phase of the original particles due to transfer of kinetic and thermal energy, and therefore no change in their original physical properties. The particles are always at a temperature below the main gas temperature. The particles exiting the nozzle


54


are directed toward a surface of a substrate to coat it.




Upon striking a substrate opposite the nozzle


54


the particles flatten into a nub-like structure with an aspect ratio of generally about 5 to 1. When the substrate is a metal and the particles are a metal the particles striking the substrate surface fracture the oxidation on the surface layer and subsequently form a direct metal-to-metal bond between the metal particle and the metal substrate. Upon impact the kinetic sprayed particles transfer substantially all of their kinetic and thermal energy to the substrate surface and stick if their yield stress has been exceeded. As discussed above, for a given particle to adhere to a substrate it is necessary that it reach or exceed its critical velocity which is defined as the velocity where at it will adhere to a substrate when it strikes the substrate after exiting the nozzle. This critical velocity is dependent on the material composition of the particle. In general, harder materials must achieve a higher critical velocity before they adhere to a given substrate. It is not known at this time exactly what is the nature of the particle to substrate bond; however, it is believed that a portion of the bond is due to the particles plastically deforming upon striking the substrate.




As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,139,913 the substrate material may be comprised of any of a wide variety of materials including a metal, an alloy, a semi-conductor, a ceramic, a plastic, and mixtures of these materials. All of these substrates can be coated by the process of the present invention. The particles used in the present invention may comprise any of the materials disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,139,913 and 6,283,386 in addition to other know particles. These particles generally comprise metals, alloys, ceramics, polymers, diamonds and mixtures of these.




As discussed above, present kinetic spray systems generally utilize particles of 106 microns or less. Larger particles do not adhere to the substrates in current systems. The present invention discloses a method for using much larger particles than previous systems. In fact, the present invention discloses use of particle in the range of up to 250 microns. This is accomplished by making two modifications to present kinetic spray systems.




First, the inner diameter of the powder injector tube


50


, which directs the powder into the de Laval nozzle


54


, is reduced to a size of from 0.90 millimeter to 0.40 millimeter. This is in contrast to a typical system wherein the powder injector tube generally has an inner diameter of approximately 2.45 millimeters or larger. This is believed to provide two important benefits that allow for spraying of larger particles. The smaller diameter reduces the amount of unheated air that is combined with the heated main gas in the mixing chamber


42


and thereby leads to a smaller reduction in the main gas temperature. The higher the main gas temperature the faster a given particle is accelerated over a given distance. In addition, the smaller the inner diameter of the injector tube


50


the less turbulence it introduces in the flow of the gas through the nozzle


54


. Turbulence is detrimental to acceleration of particles in the nozzle


54


. As a theoretical limit the size of the inner diameter of the injector tube


50


can be reduced down to the size of the particles one is injecting, however, in general it is preferably from 0.90 to 0.40 millimeters in diameter.




Second, the length of the nozzle


54


from the throat


58


to the exit end


60


is greatly increased. In a typical system the length of the nozzle


54


from the throat


58


to the exit end


60


is from 60 to 80 millimeters. In the present invention the length has been increased to from 200 to 400 millimeters. This increase in length in combination with the smaller injector tube


50


inner diameter allows one to spray particles up to 250 microns in diameter. The longer nozzle


54


allows one to keep the main gas temperature below the melting temperature of many useful materials and to use very large particles of these materials. In general, the present invention extends the size of usable powders to ones up to 250 microns in diameter. The longer length enables the main gas to accelerate the larger particles to velocities upon exit of from 300 to 1200 m/s.




EXAMPLE 1




In a first example the system


10


was use to spray copper particles having an average nominal diameter of 250 microns onto an aluminum substrate. The substrate was not sandblasted prior to attempts to coat it. Using a nozzle


54


having a length of 80 millimeters from throat


58


to exit end


60


, a throat


58


of 2 millimeters, and an injector tube


50


inner diameter of 0.89, the particles could not be adhered to the substrate. When the system


10


was changed to a nozzle


54


having a length of 300 millimeters from the 2 millimeter throat


58


to the exit end


60


the particles adhered very well to the substrate. The nozzle


54


had a rectangular cross-sectional area beyond the throat


58


and an exit size of 5 by 12.5 millimeters. In both experiments the main gas temperature was set at 1200° F. and its pressure was 300 psi. The powder feed parameters were: 70° F., 350 psi and 500 rpm on the feeder.




While the preferred embodiment of the present invention has been described so as to enable one skilled in the art to practice the present invention, it is to be understood that variations and modifications may be employed without departing from the concept and intent of the present invention as defined in the following claims. The preceding description is intended to be exemplary and should not be used to limit the scope of the invention. The scope of the invention should be determined only by reference to the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method of kinetic spray coating a substrate comprising the steps of:a) providing particles having an average nominal diameter of greater than 106 to 250 microns; b) entraining the particles into a flow of a gas, the gas at a temperature below a melt temperature of the particles; and c) directing the particles entrained in the flow of gas through a supersonic nozzle having a length from a throat to an exit end of from 200 to 400 millimeters, thereby accelerating the particles to a velocity sufficient to result in adherence of the particles on a substrate positioned opposite the nozzle.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein step a) comprises providing particles having an average nominal diameter of from 125 to 250 microns.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein step a) comprises providing particles comprising at least one of a metal, an alloy, a polymer, a ceramic, a diamond, or mixtures thereof.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein step b) further comprises setting the gas at a temperature of from 300 to 3000° F.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the gas is set at a temperature of from 300 to 1500° F.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising directing the particles entrained in the flow of gas through a supersonic nozzle having a throat diameter of from 3.5 to 1.5 millimeters.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising directing the particles entrained in the flow of gas through a supersonic nozzle having a throat diameter of from 3.0 to 2.0 millimeters.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein step c) comprises directing the particles entrained in the flow of gas through a supersonic nozzle having a length from the throat to the exit end of from 250 to 350 millimeters.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of directing the particles of step a) through an injector tube having an inner diameter of from 0.40 to 0.90 millimeters and then entraining the particles into the flow of gas in step b).
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein step c) further comprises positioning a substrate comprising at least one of a metal, an alloy, a ceramic, a plastic, or a mixture thereof opposite the nozzle.
  • 11. A method of kinetic spray coating a substrate comprising the steps of:a) providing particles having an average nominal diameter equal of greater than 106 to 250 microns; b) passing the particles through a powder injector tube having an inner diameter equal to or less than 0.90 millimeters and into a flow of a gas; c) entraining the particles into the flow of the gas, the gas at a temperature below a melt temperature of the particles; and d) directing the particles entrained in the flow of gas through a supersonic nozzle having a length from a throat to an exit end of from 200 to 400 millimeters thereby accelerating the particles to a velocity sufficient to result in adherence of the particles on a substrate positioned opposite the nozzle.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein step a) comprises providing particles having an average nominal diameter of from 125 to 250 microns.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, wherein step a) comprises providing particles comprising at least one of a metal, an alloy, a polymer, a ceramic, a diamond, or mixtures thereof.
  • 14. The method of claim 11, wherein step b) further comprises setting the gas at a temperature of from 300 to 3000° F.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the gas is set at a temperature of from 300 to 1500° F.
  • 16. The method of claim 11, further comprising directing the particles entrained in the flow of gas through a supersonic nozzle having a throat diameter of from 3.5 to 1.5 millimeters.
  • 17. The method of claim 11, further comprising directing the particles entrained in the flow of gas through a supersonic nozzle having a throat diameter of from 3.0 to 2.0 millimeters.
  • 18. The method of claim 11, wherein step d) comprises directing the particles entrained in the flow of gas through a supersonic nozzle having a length from the throat to the exit end of from 250 to 350 millimeters.
  • 19. The method of claim 11, wherein step b) comprises passing the particles of step a) through a powder injector tube having an inner diameter of from 0.40 to 0.90 millimeters.
  • 20. The method of claim 11, wherein step d) further comprises positioning a substrate comprising at least one of a metal, an alloy, a ceramic, a plastic, or a mixture thereof opposite the nozzle.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

U.S. Pat. No. 6,139,913, “Kinetic Spray Coating Method and Apparatus,” and U.S. Pat. No. 6,283,386 “Kinetic Spray Coating Apparatus” are incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (26)
Number Name Date Kind
3100724 Rocheville Aug 1963 A
3993411 Babcock et al. Nov 1976 A
4263335 Wagner et al. Apr 1981 A
4416421 Browning Nov 1983 A
4606495 Stewart, Jr. et al. Aug 1986 A
4891275 Knoll Jan 1990 A
4939022 Palanisamy Jul 1990 A
5187021 Vydra et al. Feb 1993 A
5271965 Browning Dec 1993 A
5302414 Alkhimov et al. Apr 1994 A
5308463 Hoffmann et al. May 1994 A
5340015 Hira et al. Aug 1994 A
5395679 Myers et al. Mar 1995 A
5424101 Atkins et al. Jun 1995 A
5464146 Zalvzec et al. Nov 1995 A
5476725 Papich et al. Dec 1995 A
5527627 Lautzenhiser et al. Jun 1996 A
5593740 Strumbon et al. Jan 1997 A
5648123 Kuhn et al. Jul 1997 A
5965193 Ning et al. Oct 1999 A
5975996 Settles Nov 1999 A
6033622 Maruyama Mar 2000 A
6074737 Jordan et al. Jun 2000 A
6129948 Plummet et al. Oct 2000 A
6139913 Van Steenkiste et al. Oct 2000 A
6283386 Van Steenkiste et al. Sep 2001 B1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (16)
Entry
Van Steenkiste, et al; Kinetic Spray Coatings; in Surface & Coatings Technology III; 1999; pp. 62-71.
Liu, et al; Recent Development in the Fabrication of Metal Matrix-Particulate Composites Using Powder Metallurgy Techniques; in Journal of Material Science 29; 1994; pp. 1999-2007; National University of Singapore, Japan.
Papyrin; The Cold Gas-Dynamic Spraying Method a New Method for Coatings Deposition Promises a New Generation of Technologies; Novosibirsk, Russia. No date.
McCune, al; Characterization of Copper and Steel Coatings Made by the Cold Gas-Dynamic Spray Method; National Thermal Spray Conference. No date.
Alkhimov, et al; A Method of “Cold” Gas-Dynamic Deposition; Sov. Phys. Kokl. 36( Dec. 12, 1990; pp. 1047-1049.
Dykuizen, et al; Impact of High Velocity Cold Spray Particles; in Journal of Thermal Spray Technology 8(4); 1999; pp. 559-564.
Swartz, et al; Thermal Resistance At Interfaces; Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 51, No. 26, Dec. 28, 1987; pp. 2201-2202.
Davis, et al; Thermal Conductivity of Metal-Matrix Composlites; J.Appl. Phys. 77 (10), May 15, 1995; pp. 4494-4960.
Stoner et al; Measurements of the Kapitza Conductance between Diamond and Several Metals; Physical Review Letters, vol. 68, No. 10; Mar. 9, 1992; pp. 1563-1566.
Stoner et al; Kapitza conductance and heat flow between solids at temperatures from 50 to 300K; Physical Review B, vol. 48, No. 22, Dec. 1, 1993-II; pp. 16374;16387.
Johnson et al; Diamond/Al metal matrix composites formed by the pressureless metal infiltration process; J. Mater,Res., vol. 8, No. 5, May 1993; pp. 11691173.
Rajan et al; Reinforcement coatings and interfaces in Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites; pp. 3491-3503. 1998.
LEC Manufacturing and Engineering Capabilities; Lanxide Electronic Components, Inc. No date.
Dykhuizen et al; Gas Dynamic of Cold Spray; Journal of Thermal Spray Technology; Jun. 1998; pp. 205-212.
McCune et al; An Exploration of the Cold Gas-Dynamic Spray Method For Several Materials Systems; No date.
Ibrahim et al; Particulate Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites—A Review; Journal of Matrials Science 26; pp. 1137-1156. No date.