Patent Application
20170067086
The present invention relates to a galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition as well as an efficient method of producing it.
Human breast milk is known to contain a number of different oligosaccharides which are ascribed some of the beneficial health effects of breast feeding infants (Kunz et al. (2000)). For example, some oligosaccharides, such as FOS, GOS or inulin, are so-called prebiotics, which means that they promote the beneficial bacteria of the gastrointestinal system and disfavour the harmful bacteria. Oligosaccharides are, due to their health promoting effects, frequently used in functional food products, such as infant formulas and clinical nutrition.
There are several approaches to the production of oligosaccharides. One approach is based on isolating oligosaccharides from naturally occurring sources. Fructose-oligosaccharide (FOS) and inulin are for example found naturally in Jerusalem artichoke, burdock, chicory, leeks, onions and asparagus and may be isolated from these crops. Preparation of inulin from chicory roots is e.g. described in Frank (2002). This approach to the production of oligosaccharides is limited by the availability of suitable crops and may be impossible to implement for more complex oligosaccharides.
Another approach is based on enzymatic synthesis in which enzymes catalyse the synthesis of the oligosaccharides. Yun (1996) describes the enzymatic production of fructo-oligosaccharides using enzymes having fructosyltransferase activity and using sucrose as substrate for the enzyme.
Yet an example of enzymatic synthesis is described in WO 01/90,317 A2 which discloses a method of producing galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) of the formula Gal-Gal-Glc using a special beta-galactosidase enzyme and lactose as substrate.
EP 2 138 586 A1 discloses process for the regio-selective manufacture of disaccharides or oligosaccharides by transglycosylation or hydrolysis of a carbohydrate donator molecule and a glycosyl acceptor molecule in the presence of a glycosidase in the presence of at least one dialkyl amide. However, EP 2 138 586 A1 does not disclose removal, during the incubation, of free leaving groups released from the glycosyl donor.
WO 2009/113,030 A2 describes a process for the production of pure lactose-based galactooligosaccharides using microbial whole cells in a reactor with cross flow hollow fiber micro filtration system. However, WO 2009/113,030 A2 does not contain any teaching regarding the production of hetero-galacto-oligosaccharides using a galactosyl acceptor which is not related to the donor.
WO 2012/010,597 A1 discloses a method of producing compositions containing galacto-oligosaccharides as well as galacto-oligosaccharide-containing compositions as such. However, WO 2012/010,597 A1 does not disclose the removal, during the incubation, of free leaving groups released from the galactosyl donor.
An object of the present invention is to provide improved methods of producing galacto-oligosaccharides, and particularly galacto-oligosaccharides having a different reducing end than the galactosyl donor used during the production.
The present inventors have found that, surprisingly, leaving groups released from the donor during synthesis of galacto-oligosaccharides act as competing galactosyl acceptors and reduces the yield of the above-mentioned galacto-oligosaccharides. This is particularly surprising as initial trials performed by the inventors have indicated that leaving groups, and particularly glucose, are poor galactosyl acceptors. The present inventors have furthermore discovered that the yield of the above-mentioned galacto-oligosaccharides (having a different reducing end than the galactosyl donor) may be increased by removing released leaving groups from the reaction mixture during the incubation of galactosyl donor, galactosyl acceptor and beta-galactosidase enzyme.
Reaction b) is an undesired side reaction which leads to so-called self-galactosylation of the donor, e.g. further galactosylated lactose if the donor is lactose. This by-product is difficult and expensive to remove from the oligosaccharide product. The present inventors have discovered that the level of self-galactosylation can be reduced significantly by using a first enzyme having a high transgalactosylation efficiency (a low T-value) in combination with a relatively low concentration of galactosyl donor.
Reaction c) of
Thus, an aspect of the invention relates to a method of producing a composition comprising one or more galacto-oligosaccharide(s), the method comprising the steps of:
a) providing a mixture comprising
wherein the molar ratio between the galactosyl acceptor and the galactosyl donor is at least 1:10, and wherein the mixture comprises at least 0.05 mol/L of the galactosyl acceptor,
b) providing a first enzyme, said first enzyme having beta-galactosidase activity, said first enzyme contacting the mixture, and
c) incubating the mixture and the first enzyme, thereby allowing the first enzyme to release the leaving group of the galactosyl donor and transfer the galactosyl group of the galactosyl donor to the galactosyl acceptor, thus forming the galacto-oligosaccharide, step c) furthermore comprising removing from the incubating mixture, i.e. during incubation, a leaving group released from the galactosyl donor, thereby obtaining the composition comprising the one or more galacto-oligosaccharide(s).
The term “removing a leaving group released from the galactosyl donor” should be understood as physical removal of free leaving groups from the incubating mixture and/or conversion of free leaving groups into one or more other chemical species which may still be present in the incubating mixture. It is preferred that such chemical species do not act as galactosyl acceptors, or at least that they are a less efficient galactosyl acceptor than the free leaving group.
This invention opens up for cheap and efficient production of complex galacto-oligosaccharide compositions in high yield. The present invention furthermore appears to reduce the galactosylation of free leaving groups released from of the galactosyl donor and well as the self-galactosylation of the galactosyl donor, which both result in undesired by-products which are expensive to remove from the composition.
Preferably, the first enzyme has transgalactosylating activity in addition to beta-galactosidase activity. It may also be preferred that the first enzyme has a T-value of at most 0.9.
In the context of the present invention the term “transgalactosylating activity” of a beta-galactosidase enzyme relates to the ability of the enzyme to transfer a galactosyl group from a donor molecule, e.g. a lactose molecule, to a non-water molecule, e.g. another lactose molecule.
The T-value is a measure of the transgalactosylating efficiency of a beta-galactosidase enzyme using lactose both as galactosyl donor and acceptor. The determination of the T-value of a beta-galactosidase enzyme is performed according to the assay and the formula described in Example 3. The T-value is calculated using the formula:
A lactase enzyme without any transgalactosylating activity will produce one mol galactose for each used mol lactose and would have a T-value of 1. A beta-galactosidase having an extremely high transgalactosylating activity would use nearly all the galactosyl groups from the lactose for transgalactosylating instead of generating galactose, and would consequently have a T-value near 0.
Yet an aspect of the invention relates to a composition comprising one or more galacto-oligosaccharide(s), which composition is obtainable by the method as described herein.
Additional objects and advantages of the invention are described below.
As mentioned, an aspect of the invention relates to a method of producing a composition comprising one or more galacto-oligosaccharide(s), the method comprising the steps of:
a) providing a mixture comprising
b) providing a first enzyme, said first enzyme having beta-galactosidase activity, said first enzymes contacting the mixture, and
c) incubating the mixture and the first enzyme, thereby allowing the first enzyme to release the leaving group of the galactosyl donor and transfer the galactosyl group of the galactosyl donor to the galactosyl acceptor, thus forming the galacto-oligosaccharide, step c) furthermore comprising removing from the incubating mixture, i.e. during incubation, a leaving group released from the galactosyl donor, thereby obtaining the composition comprising the one or more galacto-oligosaccharide(s).
In the context of the present invention, the term “glycosyl group” relates to a group obtained by removing one or two hydroxyl groups from a monosaccharide or a lower oligosaccharide, such as a di- or tri-saccharide, or from corresponding sugar-alcohols. The term is used herein to describe various building blocks of galactosyl donors, galactosyl acceptors and oligosaccharides.
The abbreviations of the most common saccharides and their corresponding glycosyl groups are shown below.
In the context of the present invention, the term “oligosaccharide” relates to a molecule comprising at least two glycosyl groups, and preferably at least three, which may be different or the same type. The at least two glycosyl groups are preferably bound via an O-glycosylic bond. An oligosaccharide may be a linear chain of glycosyl groups or it may have a branched structure. Oligosaccharides may e.g. be represented as a stoichiometric formula, e.g. (Gal)3Glc, or as general formulas, e.g. Gal-Gal-Gal-Glc, Gal-Gal-Glc-Gal, or Gal-(Gal-)Glc-Gal. The stoichiometric formulas provide information regarding which glycosyl groups an oligosaccharide, or a group of oligosaccharides, contains, but not the relative position of these, whereas the general formulas also contain general information regarding the relative positions of the glycosyl groups.
In the context of the present invention the term “homo-oligosaccharide” relates to an oligosaccharide containing only one type of glycosyl group. Examples of homo-oligosaccharides are Gal-Gal-Gal-Gal and Glc-Glc-Glc.
In the context of the present invention the term “hetero-oligosaccharide” relates to an oligosaccharide which contains different glycosyl groups, e.g. Gal-Gal-Glc, or Gal-Gal-Fuc.
In the context of the present invention, the prefix “galacto-” used together with the term “oligosaccharide” indicates that the oligosaccharide contains galactosyl groups as the repeating unit. The “homo-” or “hetero-” prefix may be used together with the “galacto-” prefix. Both Gal-Gal-Glc and Gal-Gal-Gal-Gal are galacto-oligosaccharides. Gal-Gal-Glc is a hetero-galacto-oligosaccharide and Gal-Gal-Gal-Gal is a homo-galacto-oligosaccharide.
In the context of the present invention, “X” represents a galactosyl acceptor as defined herein. “—X” represents the glycosyl group corresponding to the galactosyl acceptor, and particularly the glycosyl group bound to another group. “-” symbolises the bond. The glycosyl group is preferably bound via the 3-, 4-, 5- or 6-position of the glycosyl group, and preferably via an O-glycosylic bond. In the context of the present invention, “Gal-” represents a galactosyl group bound to another group, preferably via the 1-position of the galactosyl group, and preferably via an O-glycosylic bond.
In the context of the present invention, “—Gal-” represents a galactosyl group bound to two other groups. The left bond is preferably made via the 4- or 6-position of the galactosyl group, and preferably via an O-glycosylic bond. The right bond is preferably made via the 1-position of the galactosyl group, and preferably via an O-glycosylic bond.
Bonds between two galactosyl groups are typically 1-4 or 1-6 bonds, and normally O-glycosylic bonds. A bond between a galactosyl group and a nitrogen-containing acceptor may alternatively be an N-glycosylic bond.
Method of the present invention is preferably a method of producing a composition comprising one or more galacto-oligosaccharide(s) using a galactosyl donor and a galactosyl acceptor, which one or more galacto-oligosaccharide(s) have the galactosyl acceptor as its reducing end.
In the context of the present invention the terms “method” and “process” are used interchangeably.
Step a) involves the provision of the mixture in which the oligosaccharides are to be produced.
The mixture is preferably a liquid mixture and may e.g. be an aqueous solution containing the galactosyl acceptor and the galactosyl donor.
In some embodiments of the invention the molar ratio between the galactosyl acceptor and the galactosyl donor of the mixture of step a) is at least 1:5, preferably at least 1:1, and even more preferably at least 5:1. For example, the molar ratio between the galactosyl acceptor and the galactosyl donor of the mixture of step a) may be at least 10:1, such as at least 15:1.
The molar ratio between the galactosyl acceptor and the galactosyl donor of the mixture of step a) may e.g. be in the range of 1:10-100:1.
In some embodiments of the invention the molar ratio between the galactosyl acceptor and the galactosyl donor of the mixture of step a) is in the range of 1:10-50:1, preferably in the range of 1:5-30:1, and even more preferably in the range of 1:1-20:1. For example, the molar ratio between the galactosyl acceptor and the galactosyl donor of the mixture of step a) may e.g. be in the range of 2:1-40:1, preferably in the range of 4:1-30:1, and even more preferably in the range of 10:1-25:1.
As mentioned, the galactosyl donors contain a galactosyl group covalently bound to a leaving group. The galactosyl group is preferably a β-D-galactopyranosyl group. Furthermore, the galactosyl group is preferably bound to the leaving group via an O-glycosidic bond from the 1-position of the galactosyl group.
The leaving group of the galactosyl donor may for example be a glycosyl group and/or a sugar-alcohol group. It is particularly preferred that the leaving group of the galactosyl donor is a glucosyl group, i.e. a glucose residue.
If the leaving group is a glycosyl group of a mono- or disaccharide or a corresponding sugar-alcohol, the galactosyl group is preferably bound to the leaving group via an O-glycosidic bond from the 1-position of the galactosyl group, which bond attaches to the 4-position of a monosaccharide-type leaving group or to the 4′-position of a disaccharide-type leaving group.
In the context of the present invention, the phrase “Y and/or X” means “Y” or “X” or “Y and X”. Along the same line of logic, the phrase “X1, X2, . . . , Xi-1, and/or Xi” means “X1” or “X2” or “Xi-1” or “Xi” or any combination of the components: X1, X2, . . . Xi-1, and Xi.
In some embodiments of the invention the galactosyl donor has a molar weight of at most 1000 g/mol. For example, the galactosyl donor may have a molar weight of at most 500 g/mol. It may even be preferred that the galactosyl donor has a molar weight of at most 350 g/mol.
Disaccharides are a presently preferred type of galactosyl donor. Alternatively, or additionally, tri-saccharides may be used as galactosyl donors as well. Thus, it is envisioned that the mixture may contain a combination of different galactosyl donors.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention the galactosyl donor is lactose. Another example of a useful galactosyl donor is lactulose. Yet an example of a useful galactosyl donor is lactitol.
In the context of the present invention the term “lactose” relates to the disaccharide β-D-galactopyranosyl-(1→4)-D-glucose, which is also referred to as milk sugar, and which is the most predominant saccharide of bovine milk.
The galactosyl donor may be provided via any useful galactosyl donor source, both industrially refined sources, such as purified lactose, and/or natural sources, such as whey permeate, i.e. deproteinated whey prepared by ultrafiltration of whey.
The galactosyl acceptor may be any molecule capable of accepting a galactosyl group from the first enzyme and typically contains hydroxyl groups, and preferably alcoholic hydroxyl groups. The term “accepting” means that the galactosyl group of the donor should be covalently bound to the acceptor, e.g. via an O-glycosylic bond.
In some embodiments of the invention the galactosyl acceptor comprises one or more alcoholic hydroxyl group(s). For example, the galactosyl acceptor may be a polyol.
In the context of the present invention the term “polyol” relates to a molecule comprising at least two alcoholic hydroxyl groups.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention the galactosyl acceptor is not lactose. It may furthermore be preferred that the galactosyl acceptor is not glucose.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention the galactosyl acceptor is different from the galactosyl donor. It is particularly preferred to use a relatively cheap galactosyl donor, such as lactose, as galactosyl source, and a biologically interesting acceptor, such as fucose, as galactosyl acceptor.
In some embodiments of the invention the galactosyl acceptor is not lactose, galactose, or glucose.
In some embodiments of the invention the galactosyl acceptor is not glucose or oligosaccharides of the general formula Gal-(Gal)i-Glc, where i is a non-negative integer, i.e. for example 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4.
In some embodiments of the invention the galactosyl acceptor is not galactose or oligosaccharides of the general formula Gal-(Gal)i-Gal, where i is a non-negative integer.
Galactosyl acceptors having various molar weights may be used, but galactosyl acceptors having a molar weight of at least 100 g/mol are presently preferred.
In some embodiments of the invention the galactosyl acceptor has a molar weight of at most 1000 g/mol. For example, the galactosyl acceptor may have a molar weight of at most 500 g/mol. It may even be preferred that the galactosyl acceptor has a molar weight of at most 350 g/mol. The galactosyl acceptor may for example have a molar weight of at most 200 g/mol.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention the galactosyl acceptor is a saccharide. The galactosyl acceptor may for example be a mono-saccharide. Alternatively, the galactosyl acceptor may be a di-saccharide.
For example, the galactosyl acceptor may be a pentose. The galactosyl acceptor may e.g. be arabinose. Another example of a useful pentose is xylose. Yet an example of a useful pentose is ribose. The galactosyl acceptor may for example be a pentose selected from the group consisting of arabinose, xylose, and ribose.
Hexoses are another group of useful galactosyl acceptors. The galactosyl acceptor may e.g. be mannose. Another example of a useful hexose is galactose. Yet an example of a useful hexose is tagatose. A further example of a useful hexose is fructose. The galactosyl acceptor may for example be a hexose selected from the group consisting of mannose, galactose, tagatose, and fructose.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention the galactosyl acceptor is a deoxy-hexose. The galactosyl acceptor may for example be fucose, such as e.g. D-fucose, L-fucose, or a mixture thereof.
Alternatively, the galactosyl acceptor may be an oligosaccharide, such as e.g. a di-saccharide or a tri-saccharide. An example of a useful di-saccharide is maltose. Another example of a useful di-saccharide is lactulose.
Yet a useful group of galactosyl acceptors is saccharide derivatives.
In the context of the present invention the term “saccharide derivative” pertains to a saccharide containing one or more non-hydroxyl functional group(s). Examples of such functional groups are a carboxyl group, an amino group, an N-acetylamino group and/or a thiol group. Saccharides which contain an aldehyde group at the 1-position or a ketone group at the 2-position are not considered saccharide derivatives as such unless the saccharides comprise some of the non-hydroxyl functional groups mentioned above.
An example of a useful saccharide derivative is N-acetyl galactosamine. Another example of a useful saccharide derivative is sialic acid. Yet an example of a useful saccharide derivative is sialyl lactose. Thus, the galactosyl acceptor may be a saccharide derivative selected from the group consisting of N-acetyl galactosamine, sialic acid, and sialyl lactose.
Another group of useful galactosyl acceptors is sugar alcohols. Thus, in some embodiments of the invention the galactosyl acceptor is a sugar alcohol. Examples of useful sugar alcohols are sorbitol, xylitol, lactitol, and/or maltitol.
Contrary to the above-mentioned galactosyl acceptors, the present inventors have found that N-acetyl glucosamine and glucose are less efficient galactosyl acceptors. Thus, in some embodiments of the invention the galactosyl acceptor is not glucose or N-acetyl glucosamine.
The mixture may contain one or more further galactosyl acceptor(s) different from the first type of galactosyl acceptor. The different types of galactosyl acceptors of the mixture may e.g. be selected among the galactosyl acceptor types mentioned herein.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention the produced galactosylated acceptors act as a new type of galactosyl acceptor and can be galactosylated as well. In this way, galacto-oligosaccharides may be produced which have the stoichiometric formula Gali-1X, where i is a non-negative integer. Normally, the most predominant species are GalX, Gal2X, and Gal3X.
In other preferred embodiments of the invention the produced galactosylated acceptors act as a new type of galactosyl acceptor and can be galactosylated as well. In this way, galacto-oligosaccharides may be produced which have the general formula Gal-(Gal)i-X, where i is a non-negative integer. Normally, the most predominant species are Gal-X, Gal-Gal-X, and Gal-Gal-Gal-X.
In some embodiments of the invention the mixture of step a) comprises the galactosyl donor in a concentration of at most 0.7 mol/L, preferably at most 0.4 mol/L, and even more preferably at most 0.2 mol/L. The mixture may e.g. comprise the galactosyl donor in a concentration in the range of 0.001-0.7 mol/L, preferably in the range of 0.01-0.5 mol/L, and even more preferred in the range of 0.02-0.2 mol/L.
Alternatively, the mixture of step a) may comprise the galactosyl donor in a concentration of at most 0.3 mol/L, preferably at most 0.1 mol/L, and even more preferably at most 0.05 mol/L. The mixture may e.g. comprise the galactosyl donor in a concentration in the range of 0.001-0.2 mol/L, preferably in the range of 0.005-0.1 mol/L, and even more preferred in the range of 0.01-0.05 mol/L.
It should be noted that galactosylated galactosyl acceptor and galactosylated galactosyl donor may to a limited extent act as a galactosyl donor, but galactosylated galactosyl acceptor and galactosylated galactosyl donor are not considered a galactosyl donor in the context of the present invention and do not contribute to the concentrations or ratios of galactosyl donor mentioned herein.
The galactosyl acceptor may be used in a range of difference concentrations. It is, however, preferred to avoid saturating the mixture with the galactosyl acceptor since excess galactosyl acceptor normally has to be removed from the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition of the invention.
In some embodiments of the invention the mixture of step a) comprises the galactosyl acceptor in an amount of at least 0.05 mol/L, preferably at least 0.10 mol/L, and even more preferably at least 0.30 mol/L. Even higher concentrations of the galactosyl acceptor may be preferred, thus the mixture of step a) may e.g. comprise the galactosyl acceptor in an amount of at least 0.5 mol/L, preferably at least 0.7 mol/L, and even more preferably at least 1 mol/L.
The mixture may e.g. comprise the galactosyl acceptor in a concentration in the range of 0.05 mol/L—5 mol/L, preferably in the range of 0.1 mol/L—2 mol/L, and even more preferably in the range of 0.3 mol/L—1 mol/L.
However, in some embodiments a relatively low concentration of the galactosyl acceptor is preferred in which case the mixture may e.g. comprise the galactosyl acceptor in a concentration of at most 2 mol/L, preferably at most 0.5 mol/L, and even more preferably at most 0.2 mol/L. For example, the mixture may comprise the galactosyl acceptor in a concentration in the range of 0.05 mol/L-2 mol/L, preferably in the range of 0.06 mol/L-1 mol/L, and even more preferably in the range of 0.08 mol/L-0.8 mol/L.
In addition to galactosyl acceptor and galactosyl donor, the mixture may furthermore contain various additives for optimizing the conditions for the enzymatic reaction.
The mixture may for example contain one or more pH buffer(s) for adjusting the pH of the mixture to the pH optimum of the first enzyme. Alternatively, or in addition, the mixture may comprise water soluble salts containing one or more metal ions. Depending on the specific first enzyme, metal ions such as Ca2+, Zn2+, or Mg2+ may e.g. be used. Note, however, that some first enzymes are insensitive to the presence of metal ions in the mixture.
Conventional methods of synthesising oligosaccharides often employ water-activity-lowering agents, such as e.g. glycerol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, polyethyleneglycol (PEG). The present invention advantageously makes it possible to perform efficient synthesis of galacto-oligosaccharides without the use of such water-activity-lowering agents. Thus, in some preferred embodiments of the invention the mixture contains water-activity-lowering agent in an amount of at most 5% by weight relative to the weight of the mixture, preferably at most 1% by weight, and even more preferably at most 0.1% by weight. For example, the mixture may contain water-activity-lowering agent in an amount of at most 0.05% by weight relative to the weight of the mixture.
The mixture of step a) or the ingredients forming the mixture may have been heat treated before the reaction with first enzyme to avoid microbial growth during the reaction. The usual heat treatment processes, such as pasteurisation (e.g. 72 degrees C. for 15 seconds), high pasteurisation (e.g. 90 degrees C. for 15 seconds), or UHT treatment (e.g. 140 degrees C. for 4 seconds), may be used. Care should be taken when heat treating temperature labile enzymes.
Step b) involves the provision of a first enzyme, which preferably has beta-galactosidase activity. Preferably, the first enzyme has transgalactosylating activity in addition to beta-galactosidase activity. It may also be preferred that the first enzyme has a T-value of at most 0.9. It should be noted that the method may furthermore involve the use of additional enzymes, e.g. enzymes having a different enzymatic activity than beta-galactosidase activity or transgalactosylating activity.
In the context of the present invention the term “beta-galactosidase activity” relates to enzymatic catalysis of the hydrolysis of terminal non-reducing δ-D-galactose residues in δ-D-galactosides, such as lactose. The first enzyme used in the invention preferably belongs to the class EC 3.2.1.23.
It is preferred that the first enzyme has a T-value of at most 0.9. In some embodiments of the invention, the T-value of the first enzyme is at most 0.8, preferably at most 0.7, and even more preferably at most 0.6. For example, the T-value of the first enzyme may be at most 0.5. Preferably the T-value of the first enzyme may be at most 0.4. It may even be more preferred that the T-value of the first enzyme is at most 0.3.
Even lower T-values may be preferred, such as at most 0.2.
Useful first enzymes may e.g. be derived from a peptide encoded by the DNA sequence of SEQ ID NO. 1. An example of such a peptide from which useful first enzymes may e.g. be derived is the peptide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 2.
SEQ ID NO. 1 and SEQ ID NO. 2 can be found in the PCT application WO 01/90,317 A2, where they are referred to as SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 2. Additionally, further useful first enzymes may be also be found in WO 01/90,317 A2.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention the first enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 80% relative to the peptide of SEQ ID NO. 2. For example, the first enzyme may comprise an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 90% relative to the peptide of SEQ ID NO. 2, preferably at least 95%, and even more preferably at least 97.5%. In some instances the first enzyme may comprise an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to the peptide of SEQ ID NO. 2.
In the context of the present invention the term “sequence identity” relates to a quantitative measure of the degree of identity between two amino acid sequences of equal length or between two nucleic acid sequences of equal length. If the two sequences to be compared are not of equal length, they must be aligned to the best possible fit. The sequence identity can be calculated as
(Nref−Ndif)*100)/(Nref),
wherein Ndif is the total number of non-identical residues in the two sequences when aligned, and wherein Nref is the number of residues in one of the sequences. Hence, the DNA sequence AGTCAGTC will have a sequence identity of 75% with the sequence AATCAATC (Ndif=2 and Nref=8). A gap is counted as non-identity of the specific residue(s), i.e. the DNA sequence AGTGTC will have a sequence identity of 75% with the DNA sequence AGTCAGTC (Ndif=2 and Nref=8). Sequence identity can for example be calculated using appropriate BLAST-programs, such as the BLASTp-algorithm provided by National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), USA.
In other preferred embodiments of the invention the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme has a sequence identity of at least 80% relative to the peptide of SEQ ID NO. 2. For example, the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme may have a sequence identity of at least 90% relative to the peptide of SEQ ID NO. 2, preferably at least 95%, and even more preferably at least 97.5%. In some instances the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme may have a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to the peptide of SEQ ID NO. 2.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention the first enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 80% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Gly (950) of SEQ ID NO. 2. For example, the first enzyme may comprise an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 90% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Gly (950) of SEQ ID NO. 2, preferably at least 95%, and even more preferably at least 97.5%. In some instances the first enzyme may comprise an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Gly (950) of SEQ ID NO. 2.
In other preferred embodiments of the invention the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme has a sequence identity of at least 80% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Gly (950) of SEQ ID NO. 2. For example, the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme may have a sequence identity of at least 90% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Gly (950) of SEQ ID NO. 2, preferably at least 95%, and even more preferably at least 97.5%. In some instances the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme may have a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Gly (950) of SEQ ID NO. 2. Thus, the first enzyme may e.g. have the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Gly (950) of SEQ ID NO. 2.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention the first enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 80% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Glu (917) of SEQ ID NO. 2. For example, the first enzyme may comprise an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 90% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Glu (917) of SEQ ID NO. 2, preferably at least 95%, and even more preferably at least 97.5%. In some instances the first enzyme may comprise an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Glu (917) of SEQ ID NO. 2.
In other preferred embodiments of the invention the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme has a sequence identity of at least 80% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Glu (917) of SEQ ID NO. 2. For example, the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme may have a sequence identity of at least 90% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Glu (917) of SEQ ID NO. 2, preferably at least 95%, and even more preferably at least 97.5%. In some instances the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme may have a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Glu (917) of SEQ ID NO. 2. Thus, the first enzyme may e.g. have the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Glu (917) of SEQ ID NO. 2.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention the first enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 80% relative to the amino acid sequence Met (1) to Ile (1174) of SEQ ID NO. 2. For example, the first enzyme may comprise an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 90% relative to the amino acid sequence Met (1) to Ile (1174) of SEQ ID NO. 2, preferably at least 95%, and even more preferably at least 97.5%. In some instances the first enzyme may comprise an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to the amino acid sequence Met (1) to Ile (1174) of SEQ ID NO. 2.
In other preferred embodiments of the invention the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme has a sequence identity of at least 80% relative to the amino acid sequence Met (1) to Ile (1174) of SEQ ID NO. 2. For example, the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme may have a sequence identity of at least 90% relative to the amino acid sequence Met (1) to Ile (1174) of SEQ ID NO. 2, preferably at least 95%, and even more preferably at least 97.5%. In some instances the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme may have a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to the amino acid sequence Met (1) to Ile (1174) of SEQ ID NO. 2.
In some presently preferred embodiments of the invention the first enzyme has the amino acid sequence Met (1) to Ile (1174) of SEQ ID NO. 2.
In some embodiments of the invention the first enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 80% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Ile (1174) of SEQ ID NO. 2. For example, the first enzyme may comprise an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 90% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Ile (1174) of SEQ ID NO. 2, preferably at least 95%, and even more preferably at least 97.5%. In some instances the first enzyme may comprise an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Ile (1174) of SEQ ID NO. 2.
In other embodiments of the invention the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme may have a sequence identity of at least 80% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Ile (1174) of SEQ ID NO. 2. For example, the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme may have a sequence identity of at least 90% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Ile (1174) of SEQ ID NO. 2, preferably at least 95%, and even more preferably at least 97.5%. In some instances the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme may have a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Ile (1174) of SEQ ID NO. 2. Thus, the first enzyme may e.g. have the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Ile (1174) of SEQ ID NO. 2.
In some presently preferred embodiments of the invention the first enzyme has the amino acid sequence Val (33) to Ile (1174) of SEQ ID NO. 2.
The first enzyme may for example comprise:
Alternatively, the first enzyme may e.g. consist of:
The first enzyme may for example comprise:
Alternatively, the first enzyme may e.g. consist of:
In some embodiments of the invention, the first enzyme may e.g. comprise an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to an amino acid sequence shown in Table 1. The first enzyme may for example comprise an amino acid sequence shown in Table 1. Alternatively, the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme may have a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to an amino acid sequence shown in Table 1. The first enzyme may for example have an amino acid sequence shown in Table 1.
In some embodiments of the invention, the enzyme may e.g. comprise an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to an amino acid sequence shown in Table 2. The enzyme may for example comprise an amino acid sequence shown in Table 2. Alternatively, the amino acid sequence of the enzyme may have a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to an amino acid sequence shown in Table 2. The enzyme may for example have an amino acid sequence shown in Table 2.
In some embodiments of the invention, the enzyme may e.g. comprise an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to an amino acid sequence shown in Table 3. The enzyme may for example comprise an amino acid sequence shown in Table 3. Alternatively, the amino acid sequence of the enzyme may have a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to an amino acid sequence shown in Table 3. The enzyme may for example have an amino acid sequence shown in Table 3.
In some embodiments of the invention, the enzyme may e.g. comprise an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to an amino acid sequence shown in Table 4. The enzyme may for example comprise an amino acid sequence shown in Table 4. Alternatively, the amino acid sequence of the enzyme may have a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to an amino acid sequence shown in Table 4. The enzyme may for example have an amino acid sequence shown in Table 4.
In some embodiments of the invention, the first enzyme may e.g. comprise an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to an amino acid sequence shown in Table 5. The first enzyme may for example comprise an amino acid sequence shown in Table 5. Alternatively, the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme may have a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to an amino acid sequence shown in Table 5. The first enzyme may for example have an amino acid sequence shown in Table 5.
In some embodiments of the invention, the first enzyme may e.g. comprise an amino acid sequence having a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to an amino acid sequence shown in Table 6. The first enzyme may for example comprise an amino acid sequence shown in Table 6. Alternatively, the amino acid sequence of the first enzyme may have a sequence identity of at least 99% relative to an amino acid sequence shown in Table 6. The first enzyme may for example have an amino acid sequence shown in Table 6.
Other examples of useful first enzymes having transgalactosylating activity can be found in WO 2011/120993 A1, which is incorporated herein by reference.
In some embodiments of the invention the first enzyme may contain one or more glycosylated amino acid(s). Alternatively, or in addition, the first enzyme may contain one or more phosphorylated amino acid(s). Alternatively, none of the amino acids of the first enzyme are glycosylated or phosphorylated.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention the first enzyme comprises at least two sub-units, each sub-unit consisting of a first enzyme as defined above.
The first enzyme preferably contacts the mixture and is thereby brought into contact with both the galactosyl acceptor and the galactosyl donor.
In some embodiments of the invention the mixture comprises the first enzyme and/or the second enzyme. The first enzyme and/or the second enzyme may e.g. be present in the mixture in dissolved form, e.g. as single enzyme molecules or as soluble aggregate of enzyme molecules.
In other embodiments of the invention the first enzyme and/or the second enzyme is/are separate from the mixture, but brought in contact with the galactosyl acceptor and the galactosyl donor by contacting the first enzyme and/or the second enzyme with the mixture. For example, first enzyme and/or second enzyme immobilised on a stationary solid phase may be used. Examples of useful stationary solid phases are e.g. a filter, a packed bed of first enzyme-containing particles, or similar structures.
Alternatively, the solid phase may e.g. be a free flowing, particulate solid phase, e.g. organic or inorganic beads, forming part of the mixture.
Details relating to the industrial use of enzymes including immobilisation techniques and suitable solid phase types can be found in Buchholz (2005), which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
The first enzyme is preferably used in a sufficient activity to obtain an acceptable yield of galacto-oligosaccharides. The optimal activity depends on the specific implementation of the process and can easily be determined by the person skilled in the art.
If a high turn-over of galactosyl donor and a high yield of galacto-oligosaccharide is required, it may be preferred to use the first enzyme in a relatively high activity. For example, the activity of the first enzyme may be such that the turn-over of the galactosyl donor is at least 0.02 mol/(L*h), preferably at least 0.2 mol/(L*h), and even more preferably at least 2 mol/(L*h).
The enzymatic reaction takes place during the incubation of step c). As soon as the mixture is exposed to the right conditions, which may be almost immediately when the galactosyl acceptor and the galactosyl donor are brought into contact with the first enzyme, the transgalactosylation usually starts, and in some embodiments of the invention steps b) and c) occur simultaneously.
The first enzyme is capable of releasing the leaving group of the galactosyl donor and transferring the galactosyl group of the galactosyl donor to the galactosyl acceptor. For example, if the galactosyl donor is lactose, glucose is released and the galactosyl group is transferred to the acceptor. The first enzyme acts as catalyst during the enzymatic reaction.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention the first enzyme furthermore transfers galactosyl groups to already galactosylated galactosyl acceptors, thereby generating galactosyl acceptors containing two, three or even more galactosyl groups.
The pH of the incubating mixture is preferably near the optimum pH of the first enzyme. In some embodiments of the invention the pH of the incubating mixture during step c) is in the range of pH 3-9. For example, the pH of the incubating mixture during step c) may be in the range of pH 4-8, such as in the range of pH 5-7.5.
Similar to the pH, the temperature of the incubating mixture is preferably adjusted to the optimum temperature of the used first enzyme. In some embodiments of the invention the temperature of the incubating mixture of step c) is in the range of 10-80 degrees C. The temperature of the incubating mixture may e.g. be in the range of 20-70 degrees C., preferably in the range of 25-60 degrees C., and even more preferably in the range of 30-50 degrees C.
In the context of the present invention, the term “optimum pH of the first enzyme” relates to the pH where the first enzyme has the highest transgalactosylating activity. Along the same lines, the term “optimum temperature of the first enzyme” relates to the temperature where the first enzyme has the highest transgalactosylating activity.
Step c) may furthermore involve stirring the incubating mixture.
The removal of free leaving groups takes place during the incubation of step c). The removal may for example start immediately when step c) starts or it may be postponed until a significant amount of free leaving groups start building up in the incubating mixture.
The free leaving groups may for example be removed from the incubating mixture by microorganisms present in the incubating mixture.
Thus, in some embodiments of the invention, the method furthermore comprises providing a microorganism which is capable of converting free leaving groups released from the galactosyl donor, and allowing said microorganism, during incubation, to remove a leaving group released from the galactosyl donor.
Useful microorganisms are preferably able to selectively remove the free leaving groups from the incubating mixture and e.g. metabolise or convert these into conversion products that interfere less with the synthesis of galacto-oligosaccharides than the leaving group.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention, the removal rate of the microorganism relative to the free leaving group is at least 10 times higher than its removal rate relative to the galactosyl acceptor.
For example, the removal rate of the microorganism relative to the free leaving group may be at least 102 times higher than its removal rate relative to the galactosyl acceptor, preferably at least 103 times higher, and even more preferred at least 104 times higher than its removal rate relative to the galactosyl acceptor. The removal rate of the microorganism relative to the free leaving group may e.g. be at least 105 times higher than its removal rate relative to the galactosyl acceptor. It may even be preferred that the removal rate of the microorganism relative to the free leaving group is at least 106 times higher, and even more preferred at least 107 times higher than its removal rate relative to the galactosyl acceptor.
In the context of the present invention, the term “removal rate” pertains to the number of moles of free leaving group, donor, acceptor or mono-galactosylated acceptor that the microorganism is capable of removing from the incubating mixture per minute.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention, the removal rate of the microorganism relative to the free leaving group is at least 10 times higher than its removal rate relative to the galactosyl donor.
For example, the removal rate of the microorganism relative to the free leaving group may be at least 102 times higher than its removal rate relative to the galactosyl donor, preferably at least 103 times higher, and even more preferred at least 104 times higher than its removal rate relative to the galactosyl donor. The removal rate of the microorganism relative to the free leaving group may e.g. be at least 105 times higher than its removal rate relative to the galactosyl donor. It may even be preferred that the removal rate of the microorganism relative to the free leaving group is at least 106 times higher, and even more preferred at least 107 times higher than its removal rate relative to the galactosyl donor.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention, the removal rate of the microorganism relative to the free leaving group is at least 10 times higher than its removal rate relative to the mono-galactosylated galactosyl acceptor.
For example, the removal rate of the microorganism relative to the free leaving group may be at least 102 times higher than its removal rate relative to the mono-galactosylated galactosyl acceptor, preferably at least 103 times higher, and even more preferred at least 104 times higher than its removal rate relative to the mono-galactosylated galactosyl acceptor. The removal rate of the microorganism relative to the free leaving group may e.g. be at least 105 times higher than its removal rate relative to the mono-galactosylated galactosyl acceptor. It may even be preferred that the removal rate of the microorganism relative to the free leaving group is at least 106 times higher, and even more preferred at least 107 times higher than its removal rate relative to the mono-galactosylated galactosyl acceptor.
The microorganism is preferably a yeast or a bacterium.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an example of a useful yeast, and useful bacteria could for example be Lac Z-negative E. coli strains or other bacteria which can metabolise glucose but not lactose.
Alternatively, or additionally, free leaving groups may be removed from the incubating mixture by means of specific enzymes that convert the leaving groups into other chemical species.
Thus, in some preferred embodiments of the invention, the method furthermore comprises providing a second enzyme which is capable of converting free leaving groups released from the galactosyl donor and allowing said second enzyme, during incubation, to convert a leaving group released from the galactosyl donor.
The term “converting free leaving groups” pertains to the process of converting the free leaving groups into chemical species which preferably are poorer galactosyl acceptors than the free leaving groups as such. The conversion may involve degradation of the free leaving group into several smaller chemical species or it may simply involve a transformation of the free leaving group into a different chemical species.
The present invention may for example pertain to a method of producing a composition comprising one or more galacto-oligosaccharide(s), the method comprising the steps of:
a) providing a mixture comprising
wherein the molar ratio between the galactosyl acceptor and the galactosyl donor is at least 1:10, and wherein the mixture comprises at least 0.05 mol/L of the galactosyl acceptor,
b) providing a first enzyme and a second enzyme, said first enzyme having beta-galactosidase activity and a T-value of at most 0.9, said second enzyme being capable of converting free leaving groups released from the galactosyl donor, and said first and second enzymes contacting the mixture, and
c) allowing the first enzyme to release the leaving group of the galactosyl donor and transferring the galactosyl group of the galactosyl donor to the galactosyl acceptor, thus forming the galacto-oligosaccharide, and allowing the second enzyme to convert a leaving group released from the galactosyl donor, thereby obtaining the composition comprising the galacto-oligosaccharide.
The second enzyme may for example have hexose oxidase activity, i.e. belonging to the enzyme class EC 1.1.3.5 and having the ability to catalyze the oxidation of beta-D-glucose with O2 to form D-glucono-1,5-lactone and hydrogen peroxide.
It is even more preferred that the second enzyme has glucose oxidase activity, i.e. belonging to the enzyme class EC 1.1.3.4 and having the ability to catalyze the oxidation of beta-D-glucose with O2 to form D-glucono-1,5-lactone and hydrogen peroxide without significant oxidation of glucose-containing disaccharides such as lactose.
In an aqueous, acidic environment, D-glucono-1,5-lactone typically hydrolyses to form gluconic acid.
Alternatively, the second enzymes may have hexokinase activity (EC 2.7.1.1) or glucokinase activity (EC 2.7.1.2).
Other useful second enzymes may e.g. be found in handbooks which are available to the person skilled in the art.
It is preferred that the second enzyme is selective in its conversion of the free leaving groups and only to a limited extend, and preferably not at all, converts the galactosyl donor, the galactosyl acceptor and/or the galacto-oligosaccharides.
Thus, in some preferred embodiments of the invention, the specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group is at least 10 times higher than its specificity constant relative to the galactosyl acceptor.
For example, the specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group may be at least 102 times higher than its specificity constant relative to the galactosyl acceptor, preferably at least 103 times higher, and even more preferred at least 104 times higher than its specificity constant relative to the galactosyl acceptor. The specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group may e.g. be at least 105 times higher than its specificity constant relative to the galactosyl acceptor. It may even be preferred that the specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group is at least 106 times higher, and even more preferred at least 107 times higher than its specificity constant relative to the galactosyl acceptor.
The term “specificity constant” is determined as kcat/Km and incorporates the rate constants for all steps in the reaction. Because the specificity constant reflects both affinity and catalytic ability, it is useful for comparing different enzymes against each other, or the same enzyme with different substrates. The theoretical maximum for the specificity constant is called the diffusion limit and is about 108 to 109 (M−1 s−1). At this point every collision of the enzyme with its substrate will result in catalysis, and the rate of product formation is not limited by the reaction rate but by the diffusion rate. kcat and Km of the second enzyme is determined at 37 degrees using 50 mM Na3PO4 buffer adjusted to pH 6.5. The buffer furthermore contains the salts and co-factors which are required for optimal performance of the enzyme.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention, the specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group is at least 10 times higher than its specificity constant relative to the galactosyl donor.
For example, the specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group may be at least 102 times higher than its specificity constant relative to the galactosyl donor, preferably at least 103 times higher, and even more preferred at least 104 times higher than its specificity constant relative to the galactosyl donor. The specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group may e.g. be at least 105 times higher than its specificity constant relative to the galactosyl donor. It may even be preferred that the specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group is at least 106 times higher, and even more preferred at least 107 times higher than its specificity constant relative to the galactosyl donor.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention, the specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group is at least 10 times higher than its specificity constant relative to the mono-galactosylated galactosyl acceptor (Gal-X).
For example, the specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group may be at least 102 times higher than its specificity constant relative to the mono-galactosylated galactosyl acceptor, preferably at least 103 times higher, and even more preferred at least 104 times higher than its specificity constant relative to the mono-galactosylated galactosyl acceptor. The specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group may e.g. be at least 105 times higher than its specificity constant relative to the mono-galactosylated galactosyl acceptor. It may even be preferred that the specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group is at least 106 times higher, and even more preferred at least 107 times higher than its specificity constant relative to the mono-galactosylated galactosyl acceptor.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention, the specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group is:
For example, the specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group may be:
Preferably, the specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group is:
Alternatively, the specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group may be:
The specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group may be:
It is even more preferred that the specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group is:
The specificity constant of the second enzyme relative to the free leaving group may for example be:
It is particularly preferred that the second enzyme has glucose oxidase activity and the leaving group of the galactosyl donor is a glucosyl group in which case the free leaving group is glucose. If the second enzyme has glucose oxidase activity lactose is a preferred galactosyl donor.
Glucose oxidase requires O2 as oxidant and it may be necessary to add extra O2 (g) to the incubating mixture if the normal amount of dissolved O2 in water is insufficient. It is also possible to add co-factors such as FAD (flavin adenine dinucleotide) or NAD (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) to the incubating mixture if required.
As mentioned above, H2O2 is formed when glucose oxidase catalyses the oxidation of glucose to D-glucono-1,5-lactone, and high levels of H2O2 may be problematic for the process, e.g. due to undesired oxidation of the used enzymes. In some embodiments of the invention, the method furthermore involves providing a peroxidase or a catalase which contacts the incubating mixture and which catalyses the degradation of H2O2, e.g. to H2O and O2. Both glucose oxidases and catalases are well-known in the prior art and commercially available. An example of a useful glucose oxidase is Glyzyme BG (Novozymes, Denmark). An example of a useful catalase enzyme is Catazyme 25 L (Novozymes, Denmark). Another example is catalase enzyme from Micrococcus lysodeikticus (Sigma-Aldrich, Denmark).
The method may furthermore involve contacting the incubating mixture with a lactonase, and preferably a gluconolactonase (EC 3.1.1.17), i.e. an enzyme capable of hydrolysing D-glucono-1,5-lactone into gluconic acid or its corresponding base gluconate.
Thus, in some preferred embodiments of the invention, the incubating mixture is brought in contact with an enzyme having glucose oxidase activity, an enzyme having glucose oxidase activity catalase activity and an enzyme having gluconolactonase activity.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention, the method furthermore comprises providing a removal agent capable of removing at least some of the conversion product obtained by converting the leaving group with the second enzyme, and allowing the removal agent, during the incubation, to remove at least some of the conversion product.
In the context of the present invention the term “removal agent” pertains to a particulate or molecular agent capable of capturing conversion product and removing it from the incubating mixture, e.g. by precipitation.
The removal agent may for example comprise, or even consist of, a salt of a divalent or trivalent metal ion. Examples of useful metal ions are Ca2+, Fe2+, Al3+, or Zn2+.
In preferred embodiments of the invention, the removal agent comprises, or even consists of, CaCO3.
Negatively charged conversion products such as e.g. gluconate, the deprotonated form of gluconic acid, may be removed using anion exchange chromatography.
Thus, the removal agent may comprise, or even consist of, an anion exchange material.
In some embodiments of the invention the anion exchange material comprises a solid phase and one or more cationic group(s).
Preferably, at least some of the cationic groups are attached to the outer surface of the solid phase and/or to the surface of pores which are accessible through the surface of the solid phase.
In some embodiments of the invention the solid phase of the anion exchange material comprises one or more components selected from the group consisting of a plurality of particles, a filter, and a membrane.
The solid phase may for example comprise, or even consists of, polysaccharide. Cross-linked polysaccharides are particularly preferred. Examples of useful polysaccharides are cellulose, agarose, and/or dextran. Alternatively, the solid phase may comprise, or even consists of, a non-carbohydrate polymer. Examples of useful non-carbohydrate polymers are methacrylate, polystyrene, and/or styrene-divinylbenzene.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention the cationic groups comprise, or even consists of, amino groups. Tertiary amino groups are particularly preferred and result in quaternary ammonium groups under appropriate pH conditions. Quaternary ammonium groups provide strong anion exchange characteristics to the anion exchange material.
Alternatively, or additionally, the cationic groups may comprise one or more primary or secondary amino groups. A substantial amount of primary or secondary amino groups typically provides the anion exchange material with weak anion exchange characteristics.
More details regarding anion exchange chromatography and its industrial implementation can be found in Scopes, which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
When an anion exchange material is used for capturing the conversion product, the total binding capacity of the anion exchange material may e.g. be at least 30% (mol/mol) relative to the total amount of conversion product produced during the incubation. For example, the total binding capacity of the anion exchange material may be at least 50% (mol/mol) relative to the total amount of conversion product produced during the incubation. Alternatively, the total binding capacity of the anion exchange material may be at least 80% (mol/mol) relative to the total amount of conversion product produced during the incubation.
When employed, the removal agent is preferably present in an amount sufficient to precipitate or capture the theoretical amount of converted leaving group formed during the synthesis process.
Thus, the total binding capacity of the anion exchange material may e.g. be at least 100% (mol/mol) relative to the total amount of conversion product produced during the incubation. For example, the total binding capacity of the anion exchange material may be at least 150% (mol/mol) relative to the total amount of conversion product produced during the incubation. Alternatively, the total binding capacity of the anion exchange material may be at least 200% (mol/mol) relative to the total amount of conversion product produced during the incubation.
The total amount of conversion product produced during the incubation may for example be estimated from the planned process conditions and kinetic data relating to the used enzyme(s).
Alternatively, the expected amount of released leaving groups may be used as guidance for dosing the anion exchange material. Thus, the total binding capacity of the anion exchange material may e.g. be at least 30% (mol/mol) relative to the total amount of leaving groups released during the incubation. For example, the total binding capacity of the anion exchange material may be at least 50% (mol/mol) relative to the total amount of leaving groups released during the incubation. Alternatively, the total binding capacity of the anion exchange material may be at least 80% (mol/mol) relative to the total amount of leaving groups released during the incubation.
The total binding capacity of the anion exchange material may e.g. be at least 100% (mol/mol) relative to the total amount of leaving groups released during the incubation. For example, the total binding capacity of the anion exchange material may be at least 150% (mol/mol) relative to the total amount of leaving groups released during the incubation. Alternatively, the total binding capacity of the anion exchange material may be at least 200% (mol/mol) relative to the total amount of leaving groups released during the incubation.
The inventors have discovered that the present method surprisingly provides a high yield of galacto-oligosaccharides even though a relatively low concentration of the galactosyl donor is used. The relatively low concentration of galactosyl donor additionally reduces the degree of self-galactosylation of the donor, i.e. when the galactosyl group of a first galactosyl donor is transferred to a second galactosyl donor instead of to a galactosyl acceptor.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention, step c) comprises addition of further galactosyl donor to the mixture. This is particularly preferred when a relatively low concentration of the galactosyl donor is used. By adding more galactosyl donor one avoids the galactosyl donor being depleted in the mixture and the concentration of galactosyl donor may be controlled during the enzymatic reaction.
The addition of further galactosyl donor may involve discrete addition(s) of galactosyl donor, e.g. at least once during the enzymatic reaction. Alternatively, or additionally, the addition of further galactosyl donor may be a continuous addition during the enzymatic reaction. The further galactosyl donor is preferably of the same type as used in step a).
Step c) may for example involve measuring the concentration of galactosyl donor during incubation and adding extra galactosyl donor if the concentration is too low.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention, the concentration of galactosyl donor of the mixture during step c) is maintained at a concentration in the range of 0.01-1 mol/L, preferably in the range of 0.01-0.5 mol/L, and preferably in the range of 0.03-0.3 mol/L.
For example, the concentration of galactosyl donor of the mixture during step c) may be maintained at a concentration in the range of 0.02-0.1 mol/L.
Step c) may furthermore comprise addition of further galactosyl acceptor. This makes it possible to control the concentration of galactosyl acceptor of the mixture during step c) and e.g. to keep the galactosyl acceptor concentration substantially constant if this is desired.
In order to produce significant amounts of galacto-oligosaccharides, which contain two or three transferred galactosyl groups, the process should consume more galactosyl donor than galactosyl acceptor. Thereby more of the galactosyl acceptors will become galactosylated two or three times. Thus, in some preferred embodiments of the invention the molar ratio between the consumed galactosyl donor and the consumed galactosyl acceptor is at least 1:1, and preferably at least 5:1, and even more preferably at least 10:1.
Step c) typically ends by inactivating the enzymes e.g. by denaturing the first enzyme by heat treatment or by breaking the contact between the first enzyme and the carbohydrates of the incubated mixture. If the first enzyme an enzyme immobilised to a solid phase, the contact can e.g. be broken by separating the solid phase and the incubated mixture. If the first enzyme has been dissolved in the mixture, the first enzyme can be separated from the incubated mixture by ultrafiltration using a filter which retains the first enzyme but allows for the passage of oligo-saccharides.
Often it is required to enrich and/or purify the galacto-oligosaccharides of the composition and reduce the concentration of the galactosyl acceptor, the galactosyl donor and the released leaving group.
Thus, in some preferred embodiments of the invention the method furthermore comprises the step:
d) enriching the galacto-oligosaccharides of the composition of step c).
In the context of the present invention, the term “enriching the galacto-oligosaccharides” relates to increasing the relative amount of the galacto-oligosaccharides of the composition on a dry weight basis. This is typically done by removing some of the other solids of the composition, e.g. the lower saccharides, and optionally also the first enzyme, if required.
The enrichment of step d) may for example involve chromatographic separation and/or nanofiltration. Details regarding such processes are described in Walstra et al. (2006) which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
In some embodiments of the invention the enrichment involves that at least 50% (w/w on dry weight basis) of the molecules having a molar weight of at most 200 g/mol are removed from the composition of step c). For example, the enrichment may involve that at least 80% (w/w on dry weight basis) of the molecules having a molar weight of at most 200 g/mol are removed from the composition of step c).
In other embodiments of the invention the enrichment involves that at least 50% (w/w on dry weight basis) of the molecules having a molar weight of at most 350 g/mol are removed from the composition of step c). For example, the enrichment may involve that at least 80% (w/w on dry weight basis) of the molecules having a molar weight of at most 350 g/mol are removed from the composition of step c).
As an alternative, or in addition, to the enrichment it may be preferred that step d) comprises one or more processes which increase the concentration of the galacto-oligosaccharides in the composition. Examples of useful concentration steps are e.g. reverse osmosis, evaporation, and/or spray-drying.
Step d) may furthermore involve removing removal agent and/or converted leaving groups bound to the removal agent from the composition of step c). Such removal may e.g. be performed by filtration, sedimentation, or centrifugation.
The galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition provided by the method may for example be in the form of a dry powder or in the form of a syrup.
The production of a dry powder typically requires one or more process steps, such as concentrating, evaporating, and/or spray-drying. Thus, in some preferred embodiments of the invention step d) furthermore involves concentrating, evaporating, and/or spray-drying the composition in liquid form to obtain the composition in powder form. It is particularly preferred to spray-dry the liquid composition of step d) to obtain a powdered composition. Step d) may for example comprise the enrichment step followed by concentration step, e.g. nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, or evaporation, followed by a spray-drying step. Alternatively, step d) may comprise the concentration step followed by an enrichment step, followed by a spray-drying step. Concentrating the galacto-oligosaccharides of the composition prior to the enrichment may make the subsequent enrichment process more cost-efficient.
Efficient spray-drying may require addition of one or more auxiliary agent(s), such as maltodextrin, milk protein, caseinate, whey protein concentrate, and/or skimmed-milk powder.
The present process may e.g. be implemented as a batch process. The present process may alternatively be implemented as a fed-batch process. The present process may alternatively be implemented as a continuous process.
The present process may furthermore involve recirculation of first enzyme and/or unused galactosyl acceptor back to the mixture. The recirculation may e.g. form part of step d). For example, step d) may involve separating galactosyl acceptor and/or the first enzyme from the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition and recirculating galactosyl acceptor and/or first enzyme to step a) or c). In the case of a batch process or a fed-batch process, the galactosyl acceptor and/or the first enzyme may be recirculated to the mixture of the next batch.
In the case of a continuous process, the galactosyl acceptor may be recirculated back to part of the process line corresponding to step a) or step c). The first enzyme may be recirculated back to part of the process line corresponding to step b) or step c).
It should be noted that the details and features related to steps a) and b) need not relate to the actual start of a production process but should at least occur sometime during the process. However, in some embodiments of the invention the concentration of the galactosyl donor is kept within the range described in step a) during the entire duration of step c).
If the method is implemented as a batch or feed batch process, step a) preferably pertains to the composition of the mixture when the synthesis starts. If the method is a continuous process, step a) preferably pertains to the composition of the mixture during the synthesis under steady-state operation.
It may be perceived as desirable that the level of galactosylated galactosyl donor is kept as low as possible, as galactosylated galactosyl donor may be perceived as an undesired impurity, which is tricky to separate from the galactosylated galactosyl acceptor. In some preferred embodiments of the invention, the incubating mixture of step c) contains at most 0.5 mol/L galactosylated galactosyl donor. The incubating mixture of step c) may for example contain at most 0.1 mol/L galactosylated galactosyl donor. Even more preferably the incubating mixture of step c) contains at most 0.01 mol/L galactosylated galactosyl donor, and preferably substantially no galactosylated galactosyl donor.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention where the donor is lactose, the total concentration of allo-lactose and galactosylated allo-lactose is kept as low as possible, as these compounds also are perceived as an undesired impurities, which is difficult to separate from the galactosylated galactosyl acceptor.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention, the incubating mixture of step c) contains a total amount of allo-lactose and galactosylated allo-lactose of at most 0.5 mol/L. The incubating mixture of step c) may for example contain a total amount of allo-lactose and galactosylated allo-lactose of at most 0.1 mol/L. Even more preferably the incubating mixture of step c) contains a total amount of allo-lactose and galactosylated allo-lactose of at most 0.01 mol/L, and preferably substantially no allo-lactose and galactosylated allo-lactose at all.
Yet an aspect of the invention relates to a composition comprising galacto-oligosaccharides, which composition is obtainable by the method as defined herein.
A further aspect of the invention is a galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition, e.g. the above-mentioned composition, said galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition comprising:
wherein X is a glycosyl group, which is not lactosyl or glucosyl.
The galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition described herein may for example be a food ingredient.
As described above, “X” or “—X” is preferably a glycosyl group of one of the galactosyl acceptors mentioned herein.
In some embodiments of the invention “X” or “—X” is a glycosyl group of a monosaccharide, which is not glucose. In other embodiments of the invention “—X” is a glycosyl group of a disaccharide, which is not lactose.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention “X” or “—X” is a fucosyl group. In other preferred embodiments of the invention “X” or “—X” is a galactosyl group.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition has a molar ratio between:
Gal3Glc
of at least 5:95. For example, the above-mentioned molar ratio may be at least 1:4, preferably at least 1:1, and even more preferably at least 2:1. It may even be preferred that the above-mentioned molar ratio is at least 5:1, preferably at least 10:1, and even more preferably at least 20:1.
In other preferred embodiments of the invention the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition has a molar ratio between:
of at least 5:95. For example, the above-mentioned molar ratio may be at least 1:4, preferably at least 1:1, and even more preferably at least 2:1. It may even be preferred that the above-mentioned molar ratio is at least 5:1, preferably at least 10:1, and even more preferably at least 20:1.
It is even possible that the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition does not contain any galacto-oligosaccharides of the formula Gal-Glc, Gal-Gal-Glc, and Gal-Gal-Gal-Glc at all.
In some embodiments of the invention the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition has a molar ratio between the first galacto-oligosaccharide, the second galacto-oligosaccharide, and the third galacto-oligosaccharide in the range of 50-99:1-45:0.5-25.
In other embodiments of the invention the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition has a molar ratio between the first galacto-oligosaccharide, the second galacto-oligosaccharide, and the third galacto-oligosaccharide in the range of 20-45:20-45:20-45.
In further embodiments of the invention the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition has a molar ratio between the first galacto-oligosaccharide, the second galacto-oligosaccharide, and the third galacto-oligosaccharide in the range of 0.5-25:1-45:50-98.
In some preferred embodiments of the invention the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition comprises a total amount of the first galacto-oligosaccharide, second galacto-oligosaccharide, and third galacto-oligosaccharide of at least 10% by weight relative to the total weight of the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition. For example, the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition may comprise a total amount of the first galacto-oligosaccharide, second galacto-oligosaccharide, and third galacto-oligosaccharide of at least 20% by weight relative to the total weight of the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition, preferably at least 30% by weight, even more preferably at least 40% relative to the total weight of the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition.
Even higher levels of the first, second, and third galacto-oligosaccharides may be preferred. Thus, in some preferred embodiments of the invention the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition comprises a total amount of the first galacto-oligosaccharide, second galacto-oligosaccharide, and third galacto-oligosaccharide of at least 50% by weight relative to the total weight of the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition. For example, the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition may comprise a total amount of the first galacto-oligosaccharide, second galacto-oligosaccharide, and third galacto-oligosaccharide of at least 60% by weight relative to the total weight of the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition, preferably least 70% by weight, even more preferably at least 80% relative to the total weight of the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition.
Yet an aspect of the invention relates to a food product comprising the galacto-oligosaccharide-containing composition described herein.
In some embodiments of the invention the food product is a functional food product such as infant formula or a product for clinical nutrition.
In other embodiments of the invention the food product is a baked product, e.g. comprising baked dough, such as bread or similar products.
In further embodiments of the invention the food product is a dairy product, e.g. a fresh dairy product such as milk, or a fermented dairy product such as yoghurt.
In still further embodiments of the invention the food product is a pet food product.
It should be noted that embodiments and features described in the context of one of the aspects of the present invention also apply to the other aspects of the invention.
The invention will now be described in further details in the following non-limiting examples.
A working volume of 750 mL fermentation medium was inoculated with a 2 mL starter-culture of Lysogeny broth (LB) medium with 100 mg/L ampicillin with an OD600 of 3.0 grown for 12 hours. The fermentation was performed in EC medium containing 2% (w/v) yeast extract, 2% (w/v) soy peptone, 1% (w/v) glucose and 100 mg/L ampicillin. The E. coli strain expressing OLGA347 β-galactosidase (having the sequence Val (33)-Ile (1174) of SEQ ID NO 2) was prepared as described earlier (Jørgensen et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,555,348 B2, Examples 1 and 2). The fermentor was from Applikon with glass dished bottom vessels with a total volume of 2 L and equipped with two Rushton impellers. During the fermentation, pH was maintained at pH 6.5 by appropriate addition of 2 M NaOH and 2 M H3PO4 and temperature was controlled at 37 degrees C. Oxygen was supplied by bubbling with air at a rate of 1-2 L/min, and pO2 was maintained at 30% by increasing the agitation rate. Growth was followed by off-line OD600 readings. The culture was harvested by centrifugation after approximately 10 h of growth at an OD600 value of 29.7. The 650 mL culture supernatant was stored at −20 degrees C. The periplasmic proteins were isolated from the cell pellet by osmotic shock by resuspending the cell pellet in 200 mL sucrose buffer (30 mM Tris-HCl, 40% sucrose, 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.5) and incubating for 10 min at room temperature. After centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded and the pellet resuspended in 200 mL of cold water. 83 μL of a saturated MgCl2 solution was added, and the supernatant containing the periplasmic proteins were collected by a centrifugation step. The periplasmic fraction was filter sterilized through a 0.2 μm Millipak 40 filter and stored at −20 degrees C.
The β-galactosidase activity of the 200 mL periplasmic fraction and the 650 mL culture supernatant was determined using o-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (OPNG) as a substrate according to protocol (J. Sambrook and D. W. Russell, Molecular Cloning—A laboratory manual, 3rd edition (2001), pp. 17.48-17.51).
The majority of the activity was found in the periplasmic fraction (525 units, corresponding to 98%).
A second beta-galactosidase (OLGA917) was prepared along the lines described in Example 1 but based on the expression of the amino acid sequence Val (33)—Glu (917) of SEQ ID NO. 2.
The T-value of a beta-galactosidase enzyme is determined according to the assay and formula given below.
Assay:
Prepare 3.3 mL enzyme solution consisting of the beta-galactosidase enzyme to be tested, 10 mM sodium citrate, 1 mM magnesium citrate, 1 mM calcium-citrate, Milli-Q water (Millipore, USA), and having a pH of 6.5. The enzyme solution should contain the beta-galactosidase enzyme in an amount sufficient to use 33% (w/w) of the added lactose in 1 hour under the present assay condition. The temperature of the enzyme solution should be 37 degrees C.
At time=T0 82.5 mg lactose monohydrate (for biochemistry, Merck Germany) is added to and mixed with the enzyme solution, and the mixture is subsequently incubated at 37 degrees C. for 4 hours. Precisely 1 hour after T0 a 100 μL sample is collected and is diluted 1:5 with Milli-Q water and inactivated by heating to 85° C. for 10 min. The inactivated mixture is kept at −20 degrees C. until the characterization.
Characterisation:
The determination of the amount (in mol) of produced galactose and the amount of used lactose (in mol) may be performed using any suitable analysis technique. For example, the diluted mixture may be analyzed by HPLC according to the method described by Richmond et al. (1982) and Simms et al. (1994). Other useful analysis techniques are described in El Razzi (2002).
Another example of a suitable analysis technique is ISO 5765-2:2002 (IDF 79-2: 2002) “Dried milk, dried ice-mixes and processed cheese—Determination of lactose content—Part 2: Enzymatic method utilizing the galactose moiety of the lactose”.
Calculation of the T-value:
The T-value is calculated according to the following formula using the data obtained from the characterization of the diluted mixture of the assay:
The above-mentioned assay was performed using the OLGA347 enzyme of Example 1.
The diluted mixture obtained from the assay was analyzed with respect to converted (i.e. used) lactose and generated galactose via analytical HPLC. The HPLC apparatus was from Waters and equipped with a differential refractometer (RI-detector) and a BioRad Aminex HPX-87C column (300×7.8 mm, 125-0055). Elution of saccharides was performed isocratically with 0.05 g/L CaAcetate, a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. and an injection volume of 20 μL.
The obtained data was appropriately baseline corrected by automated software, peaks were individually identified and integrated. Quantification was performed by using external standards of lactose monohydrate (for biochemistry, Merck, Germany), D-(+)-glucose monohydrate (for biochemistry, Merck Eurolab, France), and D-(+)-galactose (≧99%, Sigma-Aldrich, Italy).
The conversion of lactose and the formation of galactose to each time T was calculated from the quantified data. At time T=1 h 29% of the lactose in the collected 100 μL sample had been converted, which corresponds to 2.3 μmol lactose. At time T=1 0.5 μmol galactose had been formed in the collected 100 μL sample. The T-value can therefore be calculated to 0.5 μmol/2.3 μmol=0.2.
The diluted mixture obtained from the assay was also analyzed with respect to converted (i.e. used) lactose and generated galactose via the enzymatic method
ISO 5765-2. A Boehringer Mannheim Lactose/D-Galactose test-kit from R-Biopharm (Cat. No. 10 176 303 035) was used and the test performed according to protocol. The enzymatic method confirmed a T-value of the OLGA347-enzyme of 0.2.
The above-mentioned T-value assay was performed using the OLGA917 enzyme produced in Example 2 and the T-value was determined following the procedure explained above.
The T-value of the OLGA917 enzyme was determined to 0.3.
The above-mentioned assay was performed using the commercially available conventional lactase enzyme Lactozym Pure 2600 L (Novozymes, Denmark). The diluted mixture obtained from the assay was analyzed as described for the OLGA347 enzyme. Tri- and tetra-saccharides were not present in detectable amounts and equal amounts of glucose and galactose were seen. The corresponding T-value is 1.
The T-values of commercially available beta-galactosidase from Escherichia coli (Product number: G6008, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and Aspergillus oryzae (Product number: G5160, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) have also been determined, and both enzymes have a T-value of approx. 1.0.
L-(−)-Fucose and lactose monohydrate in amounts as found in Table 7 were dissolved in 100 mL MilliQ water. Each sample was maintained at a temperature of 37 degrees C. and pH is maintained at 6.5 by continuous addition of NaOH. Air was continuously pumped through the mixture at a rate of 100 L/min. Glucose Oxidase enzyme, GOX, DuPont, Denmark, was added to sample 2. Glucose Oxidase enzyme, Gluzyme, Novozymes, Denmark, was added to sample 3. Catalase enzyme, from Micrococcus lysodeikticus, Sigma-Aldrich, Denmark, was added to sample 2 and 3. OLGA917 enzyme of Example 2 was added to each sample. MilliQ water was added to a total process volume of 250 mL. This time was defined as T=0. Lactose monohydrate was added to the samples over a 5 hour period in 30 min. intervals.
Test samples from T=4 h and T=5 h were analysed by HPLC according to Example 7 and were found to contain significant amounts of galactosylated fucose.
L-(−)-Fucose and lactose monohydrate in amounts as found in Table 8 were dissolved in 100 mL MilliQ water. Each sample was maintained at a temperature of 37 degrees C. and the pH was maintained at 6.5 by continuous addition of NaOH. Air was continuously pumped through the mixture at a rate of 100 L/min. Anion exchange resin, Dowex 66, Sigma-Aldrich, USA was prepared and added to sample 3. Glucose Oxidase enzyme, GOX, DuPont, Denmark, was added to sample 2 and 3. Catalase enzyme, from Micrococcus lysodeikticus, Sigma-Aldrich, Denmark, was added to sample 2 and 3. OLGA917 enzyme of Example 2 was added to each sample. MilliQ water was added to a total process volume as found in Table 8. This time was defined as T=0.
Test samples from T=4 h and T=5 h were analysed by HPLC according to Example 7 and were also found to contain significant amounts of galactosylated fucose.
L-(−)-Fucose and lactose monohydrate in amounts as found in Table 9 were dissolved in 100 mL MilliQ water. Each sample was maintained at a temperature of 37 degrees C. and the pH was maintained at 6.5 by continuous addition of NaOH. Air was continuously pumped through the mixture at a rate of 100 L/min. Anion exchange resin, Dowex 66, Sigma-Aldrich, USA was prepared and added to each sample. Glucose Oxidase enzyme, GOX, Danisco/DuPont, Denmark, was added to sample 2. Glucose Oxidase enzyme, Gluzyme, Novozymes, Denmark, was added to sample 3. Catalase enzyme, from Micrococcus lysodeikticus, Sigma-Aldrich, Denmark, was added to sample 2 and 3. OLGA917 enzyme of Example 2 was added to each sample. MilliQ water was added to a total process volume of 250 mL. This time was defined as T=0. Lactose monohydrate was added to the samples over a 5 hour period in 30 min. intervals.
At times T=4 and 5 h 1500 μL test samples were taken and analysed by HPLC and Mass Spectroscopy according to Example 7. The samples were found to contain significant amounts of galactosylated fucose. The results of the Mass Spectroscopy analysis is illustrated in
Conclusion:
This example demonstrates that the ratio between the galactosylated acceptor (the intended product) and galactosylated donor/leaving groups (by-product) is increased significantly when the free leaving groups are removed during incubation.
Collected samples were diluted 1:10 with Milli-Q water and inactivated by heating to 85° C. for 15 min. The inactivated mixture was kept at −20 degrees C. until the characterization.
Samples were characterized by use of analytical HPLC. The samples were filtered using a 0.22 μm filter. The HPLC apparatus was from Waters and equipped with a differential refractometer (RI-detector) and a BioRad Aminex HPX-87C column (300×7.8 mm, 125-0055). Elution of saccharides was performed isocratically with 0.05 g/L CaAcetate, a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. and an injection volume of 20 μL.
Mass spectrometry analysis was performed with an Agilent 1200 API-ES LC/MSD Quadropole 6410 scanning masses between 100 and 1000 amu (gas temperature: 350° C., drying gas flow: 13.0 L/min, nebulizer pressure: 40 psig). The column used for LC separation is a HyperCarb 2.1×150 mm from Thermo Scientific, Denmark, running at 25 degrees Celcius. Elution was performed with 5 mM AcNH4 aqueous solution and acetonitrile.
Ion chromatograms were extracted based on the common ionization patterns from the electrospray interfase. The peaks in the extracted chromatograms were evaluated based on the mass spectra and subsequently integrated, thus providing integrated responses for various carbohydrate species of the test sample.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12152502.6 | Jan 2012 | EP | regional |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61590503 | Jan 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14374708 | Jul 2014 | US |
| Child | 15331743 | US |
