This invention relates to the field of producing and displaying of video signals, such as for television.
As background reference can be made for example, to my U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,208,382 and 6,266,093, and to my copending U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/653,983 and 09/954,969, all assigned to the same assignee as the present application.
It is among the objects hereof to devise improved techniques and apparatus for producing and displaying video signals.
In a form of the present invention, a television system uses diagonal sampling as a way of providing progressive scan at 60 FPS at the same bit rate as interlaced scan at 30 FPS.
Diagonal sampling reduces the number of pixels in an image by a factor of two. This allows one to increase the frame rate from 30I to 60P at the same bit rate. The perceived sharpness is actually slightly higher with this scan than with the cardinally sampled interlaced scan. Diagonal sampling matches the performance of the visual system and scene statistics better. All other things being equal, the perceived resolution is lowered by 1.4 rather than the two-fold reduction in number of pixels. In addition to this factor, the perceived resolution is further improved by almost a factor of two by going from interlace to progressive scan. The progressive scan does not have the interlace artifacts. The color signals can be derived from the RGB signals and transmitted with every other pixel on every other line. In this way, two color signals can be transmitted with half the bit rate of luminance. The color signals are also diagonally sampled. The display can be, for example, a matrix addressed light valve with the same filter pattern as the camera sensor. Alternatively, a standard color CRT, or a digitally addressed display, or any other suitable display, can be used.
In order to maintain compatibility with interlaced transmissions, a technique of the general type first employed by A. P. Blumlein in England during the 1930's can be used. This was called “synchronous spot wobble.” If the spot on a CRT is wobbled vertically by half the line spacing the information from two lines can be displayed by presenting the information from one line when the spot is up and from the other line when the spot is down. This produces a diagonally sampled image. It doubles the number of lines without changing the horizontal resolution of the two lines put together. If the transmission uses this technique, two lines can be transmitted with one horizontal scan. A field line of an interlaced scan can become two frame lines diagonally sampled. In this way a frame can be displayed, for example, every 60th of a second. The display would have all of the advantages of progressive scan. If the display does not have the vertical wobble, the image would look like a normal interlaced image. For digitally addressed displays, the addressing can, for example, display every other pixel on one line followed by the intervening pixels from a line store on the next line.
In
If the signal is to be obtained from a progressively scanned camera at 60 FPS, the signals can be derived from a cardinally sampled image as illustrated in
For the display, a normal interlaced scan can be used. A small coil on the neck of the CRT can deflect the beam vertically by one frame line at half the clock rate, as illustrated in
If a digital LCD or any digital or addressable display is used for the display, it can be advanced in similar fashion to that described for the sensor if the pixels are diagonally sampled.
If a Bayer pattern display is used, as shown in
If the diagonal RGB pattern is used, as shown in
The present application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/314,209, filed Aug. 22, 2001 and said Provisional Application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2222934 | Blumlein | Nov 1940 | A |
4602289 | Sekine | Jul 1986 | A |
4605952 | Powers | Aug 1986 | A |
5280347 | Shiraishi et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5446493 | Endo et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5995152 | Labuda | Nov 1999 | A |
6249643 | Mimura | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6657755 | Campbell | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6876388 | Lee et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030052974 A1 | Mar 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60314209 | Aug 2001 | US |