Claims
- 1. An in-line method for producing a rolled steel product, including continuously casting a strand of steel, severing the cast strand transversely into a series of slabs, reheating the slabs to a substantially uniform pre-rolling temperature, and reversingly reduction-rolling the reheated steel slabs;characterized by: (a) applying to the cast steel an upstream quench prior to reheating so as to quench a surface layer of the cast steel to a selected depth so that the surface layer is transformed from an austentitic to a substantially non-austentitic microstructure; (b) shearing the leading edge of the rolled steel immediately after completion of rolling to crop the steel so as to provide a precise transverse vertical face on the leading edge of the rolled steel; and (c) applying to the cropped rolled steel a controlled temperature reduction so as to obtain a microstructure of the steel that includes a substantial portion of bainite or a substantial portion of martensite; and further characterized in that (d) the slabs are reheated to a suitable pre-rolling temperature above the temperature Tnr sufficient to transform the quenched surface layer to fine-grained austenite; and (e) the slabs are reduction rolled first in a temperature range above the temperature Tnr and then at a decreasing temperature between the temperatures Tnr and Ar3 to obtain first a controlled recrystallization of austenite and then a pancaking or flattening of the austenite grains.
- 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the controlled temperature reduction comprises cooling the rolled steel at a rate of about 12 C to 20 C per second and to a temperature of about 200 C. to about 350 C. below the temperature Ar3, thereby obtaining in the rolled steel a microstructure including a substantial portion of fine-grained bainite.
- 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the controlled temperature reduction comprises a downstream quench immediately followed by a martensite sustaining cooling, the quench being sufficient to obtain a microstructure including a substantial portion of fine-grained martensite, and the sustaining cooling being sufficient to substantially maintain and preferably to increase the portion of fine-grained martensite obtained in the rolled steel.
- 4. The method of claim 3, additionally including tempering the rolled steel following the sustaining cooling step.
- 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the controlled temperature reduction is effected at least in part by laminar flow cooling.
- 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the upstream quench is applied transversely differentially to compensate for the transverse surface temperature profile of the cast steel.
- 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the reduction rolling comprises(i) a selected number of flat-pass rolling passes above Tnr to achieve a selected flat-pass reduction of the thickness of the steel and recrystallization of the austentite in the steel being rolled, then (ii) a selected number of initial coiler passes performed while the steel is of coilable thickness and the temperature of the steel is above the Tnr, each said initial coiler pass comprising reducing the steel and then coiling the product in a heated environment at a temperature above the Ar3, then (iii) a selected number of final coiler passes performed while the temperature of the steel is above the Ar3, each said final coiler pass comprising reducing the steel and then coiling the product in a heated environment at a temperature above the Ar3.
- 8. The method defined in claim 7, wherein the reduction rolling prior to the final coiler passes reduces the thickness of the steel by a factor in the order of at least 1.5:1 and wherein the final coiler passes reduce the thickness of the steel by a factor in the order of at least 2:1 so that the overall combined reduction of the steel is at least about 3:1.
- 9. The method defined in claim 8, for optimizing the production of steel products in circumstances in which the rolling mill is limited at least in part by coiler furnace capacity and by the inability of the coiler furnaces to coil steel above a maximum coilable thickness;characterized by rolling a maximum-weight slab exceeding the coiler furnace capacity and severing the slab to obtain an end-product of a target weight and target dimensions, the target weight of the particular end-product of target dimensions being limited by the coiler furnace capacity; and further characterized by (a) flat-pass reduction rolling the maximum-weight slab from a pre-rolled thickness to produce an interim steel product of a severable thickness exceeding the maximum coilable thickness; then (b) transversely severing the interim steel product into two portions, viz a pre-determined target portion having a target weight selected to be within the coiler furnace capacity, and a residual surplus portion; (c) flat-pass rolling the target portion to further reduce the target portion from the severable thickness to a thickness not exceeding the maximum coilable thickness; (d) coiling the target portion in one of the coiler furnaces; (e) flat-pass rolling the surplus portion from the severable thickness to a desired end-product thickness; then (f) transferring the surplus portion downstream for further processing to obtain a surplus end-product.
- 10. The method as claimed in claim 9, additionally including, after completion of step (f),(g) flat-pass rolling the target portion to a plate of desired end-product thickness, then directing the target portion downstream for processing as plate end-product.
RELATED APPLICATIONS
This is a continuation-in-part application of (1) U.S. application Ser. No. 09/157,075, now abandoned which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/594,704, filed Jan. 31, 1996, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,810,951, and (2) U.S. application Ser. No. 08,870,470, filed Jun. 6, 1997 which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/481,614, filed Jun. 7, 1995, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,706,688 and (3) U.S. application Ser. No. 09/113,428. This application also claims priority from U.S. application Ser. No. 09/113,428 filed Jul. 10, 1998.
US Referenced Citations (80)
Foreign Referenced Citations (14)
Number |
Date |
Country |
26 30 877 |
Nov 1977 |
DE |
0 099 520 |
Feb 1984 |
EP |
0 123 406 |
Oct 1984 |
EP |
0 473 561 |
Mar 1992 |
EP |
0 177 187 |
Apr 1995 |
EP |
0 666 332 |
Aug 1995 |
EP |
2 001 673 |
Feb 1979 |
GB |
2 129 723 |
May 1984 |
GB |
2 134 022 |
Aug 1984 |
GB |
62-174323 |
Jul 1987 |
JP |
62-196325 |
Aug 1987 |
JP |
8601231 |
Feb 1986 |
WO |
9221454 |
Dec 1992 |
WO |
9513149 |
May 1995 |
WO |
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry |
The Association of Iron & Steel Engineers The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel, 10th Edition, 1985, Chapter 41, Section 8, pp. 782-785. |
Cohen and Hansen, On the Fundamentals of HSLA Steels, HSLA Steels Metallurgical Applications, Proceedings and Conference, Bejing, China, 1985, pp. 61-70. |
T. Ponchelet, R. Lammar, M. Mertens, G. Lessel, A. Frantz (ARBED) S. Wilmotte, J.F. Noville, M. Economopoulos (CRM); Fabrication de toles fortes HLE par trempe et autorevenu; Dec. 1995; pp. 867-874. |
Continuations (4)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
09/113428 |
Jul 1998 |
US |
Child |
09/157075 |
|
US |
Parent |
08/870470 |
Jun 1997 |
US |
Child |
09/113428 |
|
US |
Parent |
08/594704 |
Jan 1996 |
US |
Child |
08/870470 |
|
US |
Parent |
08/481614 |
Jun 1995 |
US |
Child |
08/594704 |
|
US |
Continuation in Parts (1)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
09/157075 |
Sep 1998 |
US |
Child |
09/350314 |
|
US |