Claims
- 1. A method for providing proper vertebral spacing comprising:inserting an implant between two vertebrae, the implant having a proximal seat with a hole formed therein and at least three branches extending distally from the seat, the branches and the seat forming a hollow cage, each branch having an inward side facing an interior of the cage and an outward side facing away from the cage, the inward side of each branch being tapered from a relatively thinner proximal end to a relatively thicker distal end, a notch being formed on the inward side near the distal end of each branch, and at least a portion of the outward side of each branch having a plurality of grooves formed therein; providing a spacer at a proximal end of a implant, the cross-sectional area of the spacer being substantially equal to a cross-sectional area bounded by the proximal ends of the branches near the seat, and a thickness of the spacer being substantially less than a length of the branches; moving the spacer in a distal direction along the tapered inward sides of the branches, expanding the branches outwardly; lodging the spacer in the notches formed on the inward side of the branches near the distal end of the implant to maintain the branches in an expanded state; inserting bone matter through the seat hole into the hollow interior of the implant; and placing a plug in the seat hole.
- 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of moving the spacer includes removably attaching a rod to the spacer and moving the rod in a distal direction to move the spacer distally along the tapered inward sides of the branches.
- 3. The method of claim 2 wherein the step of removably attaching the rod to the spacer includes providing corresponding threads on the rod and the spacer.
- 4. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of removing the inserted bone material and withdrawing the spacer to return the implant to the unexpanded state and removing the implant from between the vertebrae.
- 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the seat of the implant has at least two flat sides.
- 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the thickness of each branch is substantially constant over a portion of the branch near the proximal end of the branch such that the tapering on the inward side begins at a point that is spaced distally from the proximal end of the branch.
- 7. A method for providing proper vertebral spacing comprising:inserting an implant between two vertebrae, the implant having a proximal seat and at least three branches extending distally from the seat forming a hollow cage; expanding the branches outwardly by advancing a spacer within the hollow cage from a proximal end of the branches toward a distal end of the branches, a thickness of the spacer being sufficiently small to leave a substantial hollow space between the branches in the expanded state for receiving bone material.
- 8. The method of claim 7 further comprising the step of inserting bone matter through a hole in the seat of the implant and into the hollow space, and placing a plug in the seat hole.
- 9. The method of claim 8 wherein the seat of the implant has at least two flat sides.
- 10. The method of claim 8 wherein adjacent branches of the implant have slots between them in the unexpanded state and the slots become relatively wider in the expanded state.
- 11. The method of claim 8 wherein the thickness of each branch is substantially constant over a portion of the branch near the proximal end of the branch such that a tapering on the inward side begins at a point that is spaced distally from the proximal end of the branch.
Priority Claims (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
96 11452 |
Sep 1996 |
FR |
|
RELATED APPLICATION
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/117,469 filed on Jul. 28, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,129,763, which is a 371 of PCT application No. PCT/FR01617, filed on Sep. 12, 1997, which claims priority to French Patent Application No. 96/11452, filed on Sep. 13, 1996.
US Referenced Citations (56)
Foreign Referenced Citations (64)
Number |
Date |
Country |
WO 88-03781 |
Feb 1988 |
CH |
WO 932077 |
Oct 1993 |
CH |
WO 9616607 |
Jun 1996 |
CH |
24 60 431 |
Jun 1976 |
DE |
77 01 056 |
Jan 1977 |
DE |
25 42 263 |
Mar 1977 |
DE |
36 15 091 |
Nov 1987 |
DE |
43 23 956 |
Jul 1993 |
DE |
94 07 806 |
Nov 1994 |
DE |
44 16 605 |
Jun 1995 |
DE |
0 493 789 |
Jul 1992 |
EP |
0 595 782 |
May 1994 |
EP |
0 637 440 |
Feb 1995 |
EP |
0 664 994 |
Aug 1995 |
EP |
0 734 703 |
Oct 1996 |
EP |
94 00860 |
Jan 1994 |
FR |
2 719 763 |
Aug 1995 |
FR |
86 20937 |
Aug 1986 |
GB |
2 181 809 |
Apr 1987 |
GB |
2 294 399 |
Jan 1996 |
GB |
60-43984 |
Oct 1985 |
JP |
63-145650 |
Jun 1988 |
JP |
63-300758 |
Dec 1988 |
JP |
2-149271 |
Jun 1990 |
JP |
3-503133 |
Jul 1991 |
JP |
3-52742 |
Aug 1991 |
JP |
3-63898 |
Oct 1991 |
JP |
3-505416 |
Nov 1991 |
JP |
3-275055 |
Dec 1991 |
JP |
4-20342 |
Jan 1992 |
JP |
4-42940 |
Jul 1992 |
JP |
4-88929 |
Aug 1992 |
JP |
5-51304 |
Aug 1993 |
JP |
5-52218 |
Aug 1993 |
JP |
5-269160 |
Oct 1993 |
JP |
6-189991 |
Jul 1994 |
JP |
6-237944 |
Aug 1994 |
JP |
6-319759 |
Nov 1994 |
JP |
7-7612 |
Feb 1995 |
JP |
7-39557 |
Feb 1995 |
JP |
7-148189 |
Jun 1995 |
JP |
7-148190 |
Jun 1995 |
JP |
7-275267 |
Oct 1995 |
JP |
8-56971 |
Mar 1996 |
JP |
8-503876 |
Apr 1996 |
JP |
2551670 |
Aug 1996 |
JP |
8-215225 |
Aug 1996 |
JP |
8-266564 |
Oct 1996 |
JP |
8-266565 |
Oct 1996 |
JP |
8-294495 |
Nov 1996 |
JP |
8-511701 |
Dec 1996 |
JP |
2632850 |
Apr 1997 |
JP |
2669379 |
Jul 1997 |
JP |
9-506790 |
Jul 1997 |
JP |
10-33656 |
Feb 1998 |
JP |
10-501710 |
Feb 1998 |
JP |
10-99356 |
Apr 1998 |
JP |
2769926 |
Apr 1998 |
JP |
10-165412 |
Jun 1998 |
JP |
7-150144 |
Jul 1998 |
JP |
10-501710 |
Jul 1998 |
JP |
8-266563 |
Oct 1999 |
JP |
2008851 |
Mar 1994 |
RU |
9708205 |
Mar 1995 |
WO |
Continuations (1)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
09/117469 |
|
US |
Child |
09/587596 |
|
US |