This invention relates to a method of providing scoring information at a wrestling meet. More specifically, the invention relates to a method of team scoring that continually updates team scores throughout a wrestling meet.
In wrestling meets there are a plurality of weight classes wherein a wrestling team typically provides wrestlers for each weight class in the meet. Then the wrestlers in each weight class compete in their own separate tournament with wrestlers from other teams in their weight class. Depending on the size of the meet, a tournament may have a winners bracket and a losers bracket, or wrestle back brackets. These brackets determine the place of each wrestler. During these weight class tournaments individual wrestlers score points for their team for winning matches and gain bonus points depending on how they win their match. Specifically team bonus points are typically rewarded for pins, technical falls or major decisions. Other scoring systems sometimes include bonuses for matches won by default, disqualification or forfeit. For example, for a first round match if a wrestler wins by a pin he receives 3 team points for the win and an additional 2 bonus team points for the pin for a total of five team points. The loser of the match meanwhile will not be allotted any points.
At most high school tournaments the fans are not informed of a team's score until at least after the first round of each individual tournament is finished. Usually the score is announced over the PA system and sometimes a scoreboard is manually raised to show the fans the team scores. However, scores are not always constantly updated and occasionally PA announcers are difficult to understand.
As a result of team results not constantly being updated often times wrestlers and fans alike are left not realizing the significance of matches. For example only, an instance could occur in a 16 team event where with two weight classes left in competition as many as four, if not more, teams could be in contention for winning the overall team point total. However, because adequate team wrestling scoreboards are not available, there is no way for the individual wrestlers or their fans to realize the significance of the matches they are partaking in. Thus, the potential excitement of the crowd and extra edge of competitors is curbed. Additionally errors occur in scoring that are not caught until days after a meet, creating controversy as to the legitimacy of meet.
Thus, it is a principal object of the present invention to provide a method of providing team scoring information at a wrestling meet.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a method of providing scoring information that is able to constantly update.
These and other objects, features, or advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the specification and the claims.
A method of providing team scoring information at a wrestling meet. The method includes providing a scoreboard having a plurality of team names thereon and providing a team score associated with each team name. The method also involves inputting information related to wrestling match results thereon and updating the team score based upon the inputted information related to wrestling match results.
The scoreboard itself 10 has a display screen 14 that contains a plurality of team names 16. Adjacent each team name 16 on the display screen 14 is a team score 18 that is associated with the team name 16. The team name 16 may be arranged in any manner such as alphabetically or by ascending or descending manner in relation to the team score 18 accrued. Additionally, the display screen 14 has weight class identification 20 thereon to indicate the most recent weight class completed such that spectators know the state of the current scoring. Additionally, advertising areas 22 may be placed on either side of the display screen 14. Also the points earned for a particular match 23 are displayed adjacent the team 16. Thus, as match results are received at the scorer's table 12 information regarding the results are inputted into the controller 13 and the display on the scoreboard regarding team scores and the weight classes completed. The controller may also calculate and the scoreboard display potential points 21 still possible for each team.
In operation, using either embodiment as seen in
The method can further comprise arranging the team names either alphabetically or in ascending or descending order according to team score 18. Additionally, the method includes providing which weight classes have been completed in the meet with the scoring device, thus allowing a spectator to know the up to date team score totals. Also, the possible points 21 remaining for each team are calculated and displayed on the scoreboard 10. Therefore, when several teams are in contention for winning a team title with only a couple of weight classes left remaining in a wrestling meet, spectators are apprised of the situation. This ensures maximum fan participation and competitor awareness. Additionally, by constantly updating scores that all spectators can watch, errors in scoring are additionally minimized as fans and coaches can point out scoring mistakes. Thus, at the very least all the stated objectives have been met.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other various modifications could be made to the device without the parting from the spirit in scope of this invention. All such modifications and changes fall within the scope of the claims and are intended to be covered thereby.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
D167094 | Baumann | Jun 1952 | S |
2669389 | Mesi et al. | Feb 1954 | A |
3104484 | Wood | Sep 1963 | A |
D218344 | Myers | Aug 1970 | S |
3727213 | Kurtenbach | Apr 1973 | A |
3737889 | Sweeny | Jun 1973 | A |
D229076 | Kurtenbach | Nov 1973 | S |
3943505 | Berzin et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4045788 | Castelli et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4133289 | Beattie | Jan 1979 | A |
4164910 | Feiler | Aug 1979 | A |
4592546 | Fascenda et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
5531453 | Penston, III | Jul 1996 | A |
5620099 | Bickett et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5653634 | Hodges | Aug 1997 | A |
5894261 | Green | Apr 1999 | A |
6076021 | Houriet et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6135881 | Abbott et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6162129 | Nielsen | Dec 2000 | A |
6536041 | Knudson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
7117619 | Huber | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7248888 | Inselberg | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7303472 | Guagliardo | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7340765 | Feldmeier | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20020152245 | McCaskey et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020178049 | Bye | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030146574 | Duhamel | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040117831 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20060252525 | Walker et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080088421 | McMillan et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080072814 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |